fbpx

March 9, 2010

Letters to the Editor: “Inglourious Basterds,” UC Irvine, Purim Cover, Dennis Prager

Revenge Fantasy

Re: “Ultimate Revenge: Jews Get the Last Word as Tarantino’s ‘Inglourious Basterds’  Rewrites History” (March 5): A great article about a great film. I saw it the moment it came out, I bought the DVD the moment it came out, and, frankly, I’ve already seen the film way too many times. I have become captivated by it, and I am glad that you have chosen to do such an in-depth piece on it—especially with Academy voting at its close. I would like “Inglourious Basterds” to win the award for best picture, among other things, because I think it is absolutely ingenious and inspired filmmaking. Indeed, as its Oscar campaign boasts, “It’s the movie that reminds me why I love movies.” For the price of a mere movie ticket, I can now feel what till now I could only imagine (or is it wish)? It’s the best (and, ironically, the most worthwhile) 2 1/2 hours I’ve spent in a theater in a long time.

Joel R. Maliniak
Via e-mail

I identified with the theme of Danielle Berrin’s “Ultimate Revenge” (March 5). In particular, I have always fantasized about extracting revenge for the murder of my grandfather at the hands of the Nazis.

My grandfather was an American officer during the invasion of Normandy. Once, on the battlefield, he was requested to accept the surrender of a German [who] was waving the white flag. It was a false surrender and my grandfather was shot in the face and killed. Needless to say, my grandfather’s unit no longer accepted surrenders of any kind, and Nazis who they came across were summarily executed.

Last year, I took my video camera with me to Normandy for the D-Day commemorations. I was surprised to see the German cemetery full of visitors. I drove in to find German war veterans and their families laying wreaths at the graves of the Nazi fallen. As I approached one of the German veterans, he took off his glasses as I videotaped him, as if saying, look into my eyes, I am not a monster. I spoke with him and told him what had befallen my grandfather. He did not seem surprised at all and he even had the nerve to shrug his shoulders and dismiss me. As you can imagine, my blood was boiling inside, but the war is over, and to attack this man would have been a crime.

Watching the film “Inglourious Basterds,” I must admit relishing the image of the degraded Nazi—after all, they killed my grandfather and altered the course of our family destiny. I think a little virtual vengeance is in order.

Abraham Raphael
Agoura Hills


Jews as Anti-Semites?

I wish to compliment Tom Tugend on his recent piece in The Jewish Journal, “Realism or Anti-Semitism?” (Jan. 29). In my experience, I have found that the most virulent of anti-Semites can be found among us Jews. That is certainly true in academia. Take, for example, the writings of Noam Chomsky, or the pro-Palestinian sentiment of a myriad of Jewish professors at Columbia University, if not the university itself. Or how about the fact that the local teachers union, UTLA (of which I am a member) was set to sponsor Palestinian activists to rail against Israel in a public rally until Jewish teachers rose up against Jewish UTLA president A.J. Duffy and his decision to allow it to go on?

Speaking of Israel, and with the above comments in mind, since I believe that the line between being anti-Israel and being anti-Semitic (the first a bad attempt at disguising the second) is very pronounced and not blurred at all, it should come as no surprise that in an industry begun and maintained largely by Jews, anti-Semitism in its product becomes a no-brainer. How else would it be possible for the PLO in the film “Munich” to be portrayed as regular people with regular emotions? Again, kudos to Mr. Tugend.

Marc Yablonka
Burbank


Creation by Design … or Not

In response to Dennis Prager’s article “Jews and the Afterlife” (Feb. 26), one wonders if our universe was created by chance, or is there originality in creation, i.e. is there a creator who formed our world, such as a God?

If our world was created by chance, being part of that system, everything that happens in our life is obviously by random. We were born by chance, and there is no further existence for us in the future (whatever that is in a world of chance).

On the other hand, if there is a creator, or a God, then one wonders why everything, including atoms, ends up in death. What’s the purpose of creating something that doesn’t last? In such a scenario, one can assume that we are only a segment of a larger plan that we don’t fully understand. Therefore, living in our third-dimensional universe is only part and parcel of our total existence, which probably began in a lower dimension and continuous into the higher ones toward infinity. There is no death.

Danny Bental
Tarzana


Politics, but Not as Usual

What a disrespectful picture of Sen. Lieberman on the cover of your Feb. 26 issue. He does not deserve that treatment. You gave Obama a full-cover, decent photo several weeks ago. Sen. Lieberman is far more deserving of that respect than Obama.

Marilyn Segel
Torrance


Anti-Semitic Rhetoric at UC Irvine

Re: “The Reality at University of California, Irvine” (Feb. 26), I was struck by Chemerinsky’s concern for UCI’s reputation for tolerance in reaction to complaints of anti-Semitism: “Any accusations, even false ones, that are repeated enough begin to be believed.” What about the repeated effect on sensitive Jewish students feeling the lash of “anti-Jewish” statements on a continual basis — especially on behalf of annihilation-oriented countries?

And shouldn’t UCI take an aggressive and moral stand by vigorously pressing for prosecuting conspiring criminal trespassers of free speech? Furthermore, UCI should condemn behavior that serves the annihilative goal of terrorist-supporting regimes, whose agenda emanates from World War II.

Charles S. Berdiansky
Los Angeles

Erwin Chemerinsky’s article brought to mind “Monty Python’s Life of Brian.” He wrote that those who claim that UCI “is inhospitable to Jews … ignore the many efforts by the university’s administration … including the beautiful new facilities for the campus Hillel.” This is like the scene in the movie where the Judean Liberation Front was urgently discussing the inhospitality of Rome to the Jews until one member interjects, “Well, the Romans did build us the aqueduct.”

Kenny Laitin
Los Angeles

Letters to the Editor: “Inglourious Basterds,” UC Irvine, Purim Cover, Dennis Prager Read More »

From ruin to reconstruction, the Hurva Synagogue is completed – again

After four years of construction, the Jewish Quarter’s landmark Hurva Synagogue – built by Polish Jews in 1701, destroyed by Arab creditors two decades later, rebuilt in 1864 by followers of the Vilna Gaon, and dynamited in 1948 by Jordan’s Arab Legion – is being re-dedicated this Sunday and Monday (March 15-16, 2010). All the rest is commentary.

During a media tour this week, a beaming Nissim Arazi, who since 2003 has served as the CEO of the Company for the Reconstruction and Development of the Jewish Quarter in the Old City of Jerusalem Ltd. (the JQDC), showed off the venerable if controversial NIS 43 million project which has been his dream for nearly a decade.

Arazi follows a distinguished list of public servants, starting in 1969 with then Prime Minister Levi Eshkol, who have served as either chairman or director of the government agency charged with rebuilding the Old City’s Jewish Quarter. That historic job had largely been completed when Arazi stepped onto the scene. But the new CEO resisted calls for the JQDC to be disbanded as redundant, instead pressing ahead with the Hurva project and protecting his fiefdom. (In Jerusalem, Nov. 2, 2007)

As the Hurva’s construction crane was being taken down, Arazi launched into the synagogue’s convoluted story, hailing the many figures responsible for the rebuilding. In 1999, he explained, a public committee was formed by then Minister of Housing, Rabbi Yitzhak Levi and headed by Rabbi Simha Hacohen Kook with the intention of recreating the building whose famous dome once dominated the skyline of the Jewish Quarter.

Levi and Rabbi Kook ultimately prevailed, ending a protracted architectural argument about whether to build a new and modern synagogue or to symbolically copy a building which had been the center of cultural and spiritual life in Israel and the Jewish Quarter in the second half of the 19th Century and first half of the 20th. Ultimately, architect Nahum Meltzer’s plan was adopted to faithfully reconstruct the quadrangular synagogue with its central dome designed by Ottoman court builder Assad Effendi, incorporating the extent ruins and making adjustments for today’s building code.

Among those Arazi thanked were: Dov Kalmanovitch, then chairman of JQDC’s board; Yinon Ahiman, the company’s CEO; Minister of Housing Natan Sharansky and his successors Ministers Effy Etham, Tzipi Livni and Ze’ev Boim; MKs Yitzhak Herzog and Meir Shitrith; Jerusalem’s two previous mayors Ehud Olmert and Uri Lopliansky; and deputy mayor Rabbi Yehoshua Pollack.

Before construction could begin, Arazi noted, the Israel Antiquities Authority conducted a thorough survey of the site. That dig, directed by archaeologists Hillel Geva and Oren Gutfeld, exposed findings dating back to the First Temple period and three plastered ritual baths from the time of Herod. The most significant discovery was an intact Byzantine arch standing along the remnant of a stone-paved street leading off from the Cardo. The arch – 3.7-meters wide, 1.3-meters thick and five-meters high – is preserved in the basement of the Hurva.

The archaeologists also found a small weapons “slick” from the riots of 1936, seemingly forgotten by the outgunned defenders of the Jewish Quarter during the 1948 War of Independence.

Moving indoors and dodging construction workers and porters delivering the pews, Arazi discussed the furnishings, stained glass windows and wall paintings. (At the time of the tour the chandeliers, Torah ark cover and other furnishings had yet to be installed.) The two-storey high Torah ark is a faithful copy of the original that was carved in Ukraine, he explained. In another layer of symbolism, Arazi noted that Ukrainian oligarch Vadim Rabinovich was one of the key donors of the new synagogue.

Selecting an interior design was problematic since the Hurva had undergone various renovations over the decades, Arazi noted. According to B&W and color photos unearthed by Israel Antiquities Authority restoration expert Faina Milstein, there were three stages in the decoration and painting of the prayer hall, each “correcting” the previous – from 1864 until the 1920s, from the 20’s to the early 1940s, and from 1940-41 until the synagogue’s destruction in May 1948.

Meltzer prevailed over Arazi and his steering committee to select a minimalist approach sensitive to Assad Effendi’s original design – thus visually emphasizing the Holy Ark and pulpit, as well as the remaining non-plastered masonry walls still standing after the building was blown up. Pointing to the relatively small women’s gallery upstairs, Arazi noted that stepped platforms were added in the new building where none had originally existed so as to maximize worshippers’ view.

Under the barrel dome Arazi opted, based on the spirit of the past paintings, to depict holy cities and sites in Israel. Jerusalem is symbolized by the Tower of David; Bethlehem by Rachel’s Tomb; Tiberias by a view of the Sea of Galilee; and Hebron by the Cave of the Patriarchs. Above the main door is a painting depicting Psalm 137:1 “By the waters of Babylon there we sat down and wept when we remembered Zion.” Artist Yael Kilmenik’s designs, none of which include human figures, allude to the romantic style of Bezalel founder Boris Schatz.

Turning to discuss the operation of the rebuilt Hurva, Arazi was on shakier ground. Though built by the JQDC in accordance with the decision of the Israeli government, the synagogue will be jointly operated by the Company and the Western Wall Heritage Foundation now headed by Rabbi Shmuel Rabinovich.

That decision reflects the process whereby the Jewish Quarter – intended for both secular and Zionist Orthodox Jerusalemites – has over the decades become predominantly ultra-Orthodox. Indeed three years ago, when the concrete was still being poured for the Hurva, Rehovot’s chief rabbi Simcha Hacohen Kook was already appointed as a rabbi for the synagogue. Kook, who is considered close to the ultra-Orthodox non-Hassidic leader Rabbi Yosef Elyashiv, was chosen by a panel of rabbis, with the blessing of Sephardic Chief Rabbi Shlomo Amar.

Arazi, who said he was surprised by the rabbi’s appointment, refused to attend Rabbi Kook’s investiture ceremony.

Arazi himself may be forced to limiting his involvement at the Hurva to praying there. He will be replaced soon, along with five out of the eight JQDC board members. By statutory law, the new board members are to be chosen by the Housing Minister – and Ariel Atias is a Shas party stalwart.

Notwithstanding the growing influence of the hareidim, Arazi promised the Hurva will be operated for the general public, including Jewish Quarter residents, Israeli visitors and foreign tourists. But with only 200 seats in the vast building, it remains to be seen who the congregants will be.

During the opening week, the JQDS will conduct tours during the day and will show a son et lumiere presentation during evening hours – for free.

•    •    •

The Hurva, literally “The Ruin” symbolizes the fortunes of Jerusalem’s yishuv over the last three centuries. In 1700, Rabbi Yehuda he-Hassid (Segal), a preacher who may have secretly believed in the false messiah Shabtai Zvi, led an en masse aliya of between 300 and 1,000 of his followers (sources vary on the number) from Siedlce, Poland to the Holy City. It was the largest immigration of Jews to the Land of Israel in centuries.

The group bought the courtyard next to the Ramban Synagogue – which itself stood on the ruins of the Crusader church of St. Martin. The Ramban synagogue, named for the Spanish sage Moshe ben Nachman who founded the house of worship in 1267, had been closed by the Ottomans in 1589 due to Muslim incitement. Here the rabbi and his Ashkenazi followers began building a large synagogue to accommodate the increased Jewish population of the city.

The project foundered on internal dissent, debt and the sudden death of the charismatic rabbi. In 1720 Arab creditors burned the unfinished structure together with the 40 Torah scrolls it contained. Whence the ruined site became known as Hurvat Rav Yehudah ha-Hasid — the Ruin of Rabbi Judah the Pious, or simply “the Hurva”.

From ruin to reconstruction, the Hurva Synagogue is completed – again Read More »

Picks and Clicks for March 13 – 19, 2010

SAT | MARCH 13

(ART)
Artist Rachel Schmeidler critiques the public’s celebrity obsession in her exhibition “Hollywood Most Wanted + Co.” Mug shots of figures like Lindsay Lohan and Kobe Bryant get a pop-art makeover, calling attention to the glamorous set’s flaws. Sat. through April 28. Free. ArcLight Hollywood Cinemas, 6360 W. Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles. (323) 464-1478. hollywoodmostwanted.com.

(LECTURE)
UCLA professor Yona Sabar speaks on “Aramaic, Armenians and the Jews: A Long History” for the Westwood Village Synagogue’s “Lunch and Learn” series. Lunch is served. Sat. noon. $10 (students), $18 (adults), $54 (families). Westwood Village Synagogue, 1148 Westwood Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 824-9987. www.villageshul.org.

(FILM)
Norman Finkelstein, author of “The Holocaust Industry,” is an academic who informs and infuriates. Directors David Ridgen and Nicolas Rossier look at the life of and controversy surrounding the political science professor in “American Radical: The Trials of Norman Finkelstein,” which opens this weekend for a one-week engagement. Sat. $8 (seniors, children under 12), $11 (general). Laemmle’s Music Hall 3, 9036 Wilshire Blvd., Beverly Hills. (310) 478-3836. laemmle.com.

(MUSIC)
Two chamber symphonies perform pieces from genre-pushing composers whose lives were upset by the Nazis, including Pavel Haas, Erich Korngold, Franz Schreker and Arnold Schoenberg, in Jacaranda’s “Indoor Outposts.” Sat. 8 p.m. $15 (students-advance), $35 (general-advance), $20 (students-door), $40 (general-door). First Presbyterian Santa Monica, 1220 Second St., Santa Monica. (213) 483-0216. jacarandamusic.org.

SUN | MARCH 14

(FILM)
Lev Eisha, a community of religiously engaged women, screens “Making Trouble,” a documentary about funny Jewish women, followed by a panel with comediennes and writers at its annual fundraiser, Laugh With Lev. Sun. 1:30-4:30 p.m. $36 (members), $45 (general). Congregation Beth Israel, 8056 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 575-0985. leveisha.org.

TUE | MARCH 16

(LECTURE)
Dickinson College theology professor Ted Merwin explores the deli’s part in Jewish identity with “Homeland for the Jewish Soul: The Jewish Deli in America,” a look at the deli’s depiction in film, vaudeville and television. Sponsored by UCLA’s Center for Jewish Studies. Tue. 7:30-9 p.m. Free. UCLA Faculty Center, 480 Charles Young Drive East, Los Angeles. (310) 267-5327. cjs.ucla.edu.

WED | MARCH 17

(PANEL)
Erwin Chemerinsky, UC Irvine School of Law’s founding dean, joins other panelists and KPCC talk show host Larry Mantle for a live discussion, “Combating Terror in the Skies — Balancing Privacy and Security,” as part of “AirTalk on the Road.” Wed. 7-8:30 p.m. Free. National Center for the Preservation of Democracy, 111 N. Central Ave., downtown. (213) 623-6003, ext. 10. cai-la.org.

(THEATER)
Follow Robert F. Kennedy through his political victories and defeats during the civil rights movement in Murray Horwitz and Jonathan Estrin’s “RFK: The Journey to Justice”. L.A. Theatre Works records the performance for its syndicated radio series. Wed.-Fri. 8 p.m., Sat. 2:30 p.m., Sun. 4 p.m. $20-$48. Skirball Cultural Center, 2701 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 827-0889. latw.org.

THU | MARCH 18

(ART)
Architect Frank Gehry, whose projects include the Walt Disney Concert Hall, talks about his life, body of work and influences with Barbara Isenberg, author of “Conversations With Frank Gehry.” The event, which celebrates the symbiotic relationship between architecture and music, will open with a performance by cellist Lynn Harrell. All proceeds benefit the Santa Monica High School orchestras. Thu. 7 p.m. $10 (students, seniors), $20 (general). Santa Monica High School Barnum Hall, 600 Olympic Blvd., Santa Monica. (310) 395-6204 ext. 407. samohiorchestras.org.

FRI | MARCH 19

MUSIC
Oscar-nominated actress Mare Winningham indulges her inner Jewish cowgirl during Temple Aliyah’s “A Down Home Shabbat: A Celebration of Jewish Bluegrass.” Winningham, who has recorded three folk-influenced albums, joins Rabbi Stewart Vogel, Grammy-nominated chazzan Mike Stein and other performers for this country-themed Shabbat. Fri. 8:15 p.m. Free. Temple Aliyah, 6025 Valley Circle Blvd., Woodland Hills. (818) 346-3545. templealiyah.org.

Picks and Clicks for March 13 – 19, 2010 Read More »

Palestinians: East Jerusalem build plan ends Mideast peace talks

Israel’s decision to approve new East Jerusalem houses effectively prevents any peace negotiations from taking place, the Palestinian Authority said on Tuesday, following an Interior Ministry statement released earlier authorizing 1,600 new housing units.

Earlier Tuesday, the Interior Ministry approved the building of 1,600 new housing units in Ramat Shlomo, with a ministry official saying the plan will expand the ultra-Orthodox East Jerusalem neighborhood to the east and to the south.

The statement, released by the Interior Ministry’s Jerusalem district planning committee, headed by Ruth Yosef, said that at least 30 percent of the units will be allocated to young couples.

Read the full story at HAARETZ.com.

Palestinians: East Jerusalem build plan ends Mideast peace talks Read More »

Purim reflection: Farmer’s market and the Temple Emanuel carnival

I was lost in a maze of crepe stands, nut vendors, smoothie bars and actual bars at the farmer’s market at the Grove. I’d been stood up by a girl, a 40-year old voiceover actress actually, who I was supposed to meet to see a band of klezmer, punk gypsies that were supposed to be playing in the middle of the Sunday morning craziness but were nowhere to be found (I found out later that I wasn’t stood up at all but had gone to the wrong farmer’s market—oops), but I met these people, the Kaufmans, who were munching on crepes. They let me put my coffee down on their table while I fished around for a pen and pad in my Jansport backpack, and then the Mrs. of the marital equation, Sherry Kaufman, a makeup artist, educated yours truly about the origins of the farmer’s market I’d mistakenly gone to. Life was pretty good.

I asked Mrs. Kaufman if she reads the Jewish Journal.

“It’s Purim today. Did you know that?” I asked.

Part deux: Not For Those Who Don’t Know Matt

I left the market of the farmers, drove to my dad’s apartment and picked up my sister’s dog…

…and went to the Purim carnival at Temple Emanuel, where I met up with my friend Matt and his girlfriend near the dunk tank. All around us, kid-sized Spidermans, clowns, baseball players and hippies ran around the closed off street, which was off of Burton Way, and sprayed each other with silly string—it was late in the day, the ride were being shut down—the moon bounce had already been deflated to a giant blob—and so the kids had to find a way to amuse themselves. Silly string is as good as anything. I asked Matt, who was never the strongest Jewish studies student in high school, to explain the Purim story. He actually did a pretty decent job. The video is below and it’s over three-minutes long, which doesn’t seem bad to me, but Matt’s my friend. For those who don’t know Matt, the video could probably be shorter.

 

Purim reflection: Farmer’s market and the Temple Emanuel carnival Read More »

U.S. anti-Semitism envoy wants to bring non-Jews into the fight

President Obama’s special envoy on anti-Semitism wants to recruit non-Jews to make her case.

Hannah Rosenthal outlined her goals in her new role during a recent address in Dallas to the annual plenum of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the public policy umbrella she once led as president.

To combat anti-Semitism, the Jewish people need more non-Jews on their side, said Rosenthal, who spoke at a panel on anti-Semitism alongside Abraham Foxman, the Anti-Defamation League’s national director.

Everyone expects Foxman to be on the case, she said, “but if we have the messenger be someone who’s not Jewish, who’s willing to be a spokesperson condemning anti-Semitism, it comes with much more power.”

To that end, Rosenthal said she will incorporate the annual anti-Semitism report into the State Department’s annual human rights report instead of the separate breakout authored by her predecessor, Gregg Rickman. That brings the issue to a larger audience.

“If I want to infuse this into every annual report, the people on the ground better know what anti-Semitism is,” Rosenthal said.

Additionally, she will introduce a daylong module into training at the Foreign Training Institute; modules at the prep school for diplomats usually last only a few hours.

Rickman favorably views his successor’s attempts to bring non-Jews into the fight, but cautioned that Rosenthal needs to be wary of how she views criticism of Israel.

“If she fails to see how anti-Israelism can be parlayed into anti-Semitism,” then her efforts to train and work with diplomats will be in vain, he said.

Rosenthal said she would maintain existing practices, including using Jewish nongovernmental organizations like the ADL and pressing U.S. diplomats to report on anti-Semitic acts around the globe.

Rosenthal also committed to utilizing the United States’ role as a superpower through quiet diplomacy. She pointed to the recent referendum passed in Switzerland that would prohibit minarets from being built on new mosques. Buried in the same referendum was a call for the end of Jewish cemeteries.

“Very quietly, we dealt with the Christian Democratic People’s Party and in fact they apologized and that policy is not happening,” she said. “You didn’t read about it and that policy was taken care of.”

Rosenthal, who was sworn in last November, was a controversial choice by Obama. Jewish insiders questioned her lack of diplomatic experience. At the time she readily acknowledged that after a career of advocacy, she wasn’t about to switch to anodyne niceties overnight.

She has made waves with criticism of Israel’s ambassador to Washington, Michael Oren, for refusing to deal with J Street, a liberal pro-Israel group that Rosenthal helped to found.

That drew a rebuke from Alan Solow, the chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, who said her remarks “could threaten to limit her effectiveness in the area for which she is actually responsible.” The Obama administration stood by Rosenthal.

The position Rosenthal holds was created in 2004 by legislation sponsored by U.S. Reps. Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) and Chris Smith (R-N.J.) and Sen. George Voinovich (R-Ohio).

Lantos, a Holocaust survivor, saw a need for Western democracies to speak out on the rise of anti-Semitism globally. Rickman was its first appointee.

U.S. anti-Semitism envoy wants to bring non-Jews into the fight Read More »

Salam Fayyad: The Palestinian with a plan for statehood

Pundits and politicians have taken recently to comparing Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad to Israel’s founding father, David Ben-Gurion.

No less a figure than President Shimon Peres, one of Ben-Gurion’s foremost disciples, is the latest Israeli leader to offer the accolade.

The reason is simple: Like Ben-Gurion, Fayyad is building institutions of statehood.

In the 1920s, the Jews of Palestine under the single-minded Ben-Gurion established institutions for what they called the state-in-the-making: the Haganah with the idea of a single armed force; the Histadrut Trade Union, with a department for workers’ rights, a sick fund, a bank and the Solel Boneh construction company; and the Jewish Agency dealing with immigration, schools and hospitals.

Now Fayyad is doing something similar.

Last August he announced what has come to be known as the “Fayyad Plan” under the heading: “Palestine—Ending the Occupation, Establishing the State.” The idea is to build a de facto Palestinian state by mid-2011, with functioning government and municipal offices, police forces, a central bank, stock market, schools, hospitals, community centers, etc. Fayyad’s watchword is transparency, and his aim is institutions that are corruption-free and provide an array of modern government services.

Then, in mid-2011, with all the trappings of statehood in place, he intends to make his political move: Invite Israel to recognize the well-functioning Palestinian state and withdraw from territories it still occupies, or be forced to do so by the pressure of international opinion.

In February, at the 10th Herzliya Conference, an annual forum on Israel’s national security attended by top decision-makers and academics, Fayyad, the lone Palestinian, gave an articulate off-the-cuff address, leaving little doubt as to what he has in mind.

“This is not about declaring a state. It is about getting ready for one,” he explained. “The program we have embarked upon was not supposed to be in lieu of a political process. It was supposed to reinforce it.”

“The political process track,” Fayyad added later, “is absolutely necessary because that is what is going to bring an end to the occupation.”

Fayyad went on to speak about creating a critical mass of positive change on the ground that by mid-2011 would persuade the world that the Palestinians were ready for statehood, and that it was time for the Israeli occupation to be rolled back.

“If by then we succeed, as I hope we will,” he declared, “it’s not going to be too difficult for people looking at it from any corner of the world to conclude that indeed the Palestinians do have something that looks like a well-functioning state in just about every facet of activity, and the only anomalous thing at the time would be that occupation which everyone agrees should end.” 

Fayyad has been working closely on the economic and institutional elements of his plan with Tony Blair, the former British prime minister and the international Quartet’s special representative to the Middle East, and on the law enforcement aspects with U.S. Gen. Keith Dayton.

The results on the ground have been impressive.

Palestinian security forces trained by Dayton’s troops have been deployed in West Bank cities, creating new levels of law and order and enabling Israel to remove dozens of roadblocks and checkpoints. The aim from the outset was to secure a major principle of modern statehood: a single armed force, subordinate to the elected government, with no rival militias roaming the streets. For all intents and purposes, this is the case already in the West Bank today.

At the Herzliya Conference, Fayyad suggested that Israel could help further augment this facet of his state-building by handing over more West Bank territory to Palestinian security control.

The law and order and the opening up of the West Bank to free movement of people and goods has led to a dramatic change in the economic climate, which also augurs well for Fayyad’s state-building project. The upturn in trade, tourism and consumer spending was reflected in economic growth of 7 percent last year, one of the highest figures anywhere in the world. Fayyad also is working on Palestinian budgetary independence. More than half of this year’s Palestinian Authority budget of approximately $3 billion will be raised in taxes.

There have been significant institutional achievements as well: A functioning stock market is operating in Nablus, Fayyad has been building government and municipal offices, and the nucleus of a central bank is in place.

Over the past two years, Fayyad has completed more than 1,000 communal projects, investing more than $100 million in schools, clinics, libraries and community centers. He is starting work now on a new phase to improve existing infrastructures: roads, electricity, water and sewage. Most of the money has come from the United States, the European Union and the oil-rich Gulf States.

The American-educated Fayyad, 58, was born in the village of Dir Rasun near the West Bank city of Tulkarm. After earning his doctorate in economics at the University of Texas in 1986, he conducted research at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis before joining the World Bank in Washington, where he worked from 1987 to 1995. Then, in the wake of the Oslo agreements, he was appointed International Monetary Fund representative in the Palestinian territories from 1995 to 2001.

The following year, desperate for a modicum of transparency in funding for the Palestinians, the United States and other donor nations forced his appointment on Yasser Arafat as the Palestinian leader’s technocrat finance minister. Fayyad, a small but very determined and self-confident man, bravely took on the corruption rife in Palestinian affairs, sacking thousands of superfluous bureaucrats and closing down social institutions serving as fronts for terrorist activities. 

Unlike most of his generation of Palestinians leaders, Fayyad never joined the Palestinian resistance, never took part in terror and never spent a single day in an Israeli prison. This accounts for the fact that despite his internationally acclaimed success, he has only a small domestic political base. He never joined the West Bank’s ruling Fatah party, and when he ran in the 2006 elections, the Third Way party he founded, dedicated to fighting corruption, won only two seats.

A recent survey by leading Palestinian pollster Khalil Shikaki showed that although 40 percent of Palestinians rated the Fayyad government’s performance as good or very good, only 13 percent supported him as prime minister.

Fayyad was appointed prime minister by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in June 2007 after the Hamas takeover of Gaza, and was reappointed last March. Fayyad also has been serving a second term as finance minister since March 2007.

Israelis on the right side of the political spectrum, who oppose Fayyad’s state-building project, argue that he is not as dedicated to nonviolence as he claims. They point to his presence at ceremonies honoring Palestinian terrorists and his active participation in a ceremonial burning of Israeli products manufactured in the West Bank.

Fayyad has his critics on the Palestinian side, too, who accuse his police of being nothing more than subcontractors for the Israeli occupation. Rather than bringing the occupation to an end, the critics argue, Fayyad’s scrupulous maintenance of law and order is prolonging it.

At Fayyad’s address to the Herzliya Conference, among the interested spectators was Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak. As the leader of the Labor Party, Barak is Ben-Gurion’s heir and, like Fayyad, is a strong advocate of the two-state solution.

For people like Barak, who see this as the key to a secure Jewish-majority state at peace with its neighbors, Fayyad could well be the man of the hour. And he also could prove the toughest opponent of those Israelis who see in an independent Palestine a recipe for disaster.

Salam Fayyad: The Palestinian with a plan for statehood Read More »

Ben Stiller’s Jewish Bluish Oscar moment

Julie Gruenbaum Fax finds the Hebrew in Na’vi with this fun spin on Ben Stiller’s Oscar “Avatar” spoof. And by the way, this was probably the Sascha Baron Cohen toned-down, Jewed-up replacement skit. James Cameron couldn’t possibly be offended; unless he knows Hebrew.

From Bloggish:

Somewhere between the hisses and tongue clicks, Ben Stiller threw some Hebrew into his Avatar spoof at last night’s academy awards when he presented the award for Best Makeup. Decked out in Na’vi blue-face and cat eyes, complete with tail and braids, Stiller seemed to offer a Seder preview.

“Pesach,” he hissed, then trilled and elongated his rrrs in “borei perrrrrri” before busting out with “hagafen.”

“Pesach” is Hebrew for Passover, and “borei peri hagafen” blesses the fruit of the vine in the blessing over wine.

Stiller followed his Na’vi tirade by saying, “that means, ‘this seemed like a better idea in rehearsal.’ It was between this and the Nazi uniform, but the show seemed a little Hitler heavy,” he said, referring to the nominations for WW II fantasy movie “Inglourious Basterds.”

Maybe Stiller, who is Jewish and often plays Jews, was channeling a prophetic impulse in his Na’vi rant? (Get it? Na’vi is Hebrew for prophet?)

Ben Stiller’s Jewish Bluish Oscar moment Read More »

Do the Navi speak Hebrew?

I missed the Oscars last night because I was rounding out my Sunday of studying in the library. But listening to a discussion of the awards show on NPR this morning, I was pretty sure I heard a blue, big-eared version of Ben Stiller sprinkle some Hebrew into the Na’vi language. Bloggish confirms it. Check a bluish, Jewish Stiller in the above video.

“That means, this seemed like a better idea in rehearsal.”

I wonder if Ron Artest thought the same thing after the Lakers dropped their third straight yesterday.

Do the Navi speak Hebrew? Read More »