fbpx

September 17, 2009

Los Angeles: den of iniquity and enlightenment

The new Charles Darwin biopic “Creation” has had a bit of trouble finding a U.S. distributor. The film’s producer chalks that up to religious lunacy in this article from The Telegraph. He does, however, tip his hat to the folks here in Los Angeles and that other cultural hub, New York, for not being religious bumpkins:

“It is unbelievable to us that this is still a really hot potato in America. There’s still a great belief that He made the world in six days. It’s quite difficult for we in the UK to imagine religion in America. We live in a country which is no longer so religious. But in the US, outside of New York and LA, religion rules.”

This guy’s obviously never been to Vegas.

(A real hat tip to EEE at GetReligion)

Los Angeles: den of iniquity and enlightenment Read More »

Facing Death, How Do You Live?

Mortality. The purpose of existence. How to live. These are all themes forced into our consciousness by the High Holy Days, with its liturgical focus onthe fleeting nature of existence, the imminence of death, the opportunity for renewal.

For people facing life-threatening illnesses, it doesn’t take a date on thecalendar to bring those ideas to the fore. The finiteness of life is a daily reality.

The Jewish Journal sat down with four beloved and respected rabbis to focus through the real-life lens of their personal battles with cancer on one of the central questions of the High Holy Days. How do you live, when death is so clearly in view?

Ed Feinstein

Rabbi Ed Feinstein worked through his first Rosh Hashanah as a congregational rabbi at Valley Beth Shalom in Encino knowing he had cancer growing in his colon.

Diagnosed in 1993, at 39 years old, he had a wife and three young children and was starting a new job.

“It changes the way you read all the prayers, it changes the way you hear the shofar, it changes the way you say Shanah Tovah [Happy New Year]. The themes of the holiday are life and death, and it all becomes much more visceral than before,” he said.

He endured surgery and a year of chemotherapy, and the cancer was gone. But just four years later, at one of his regular checkups, the doctor discovered a new tumor, this time in his liver — a fatal diagnosis for 80 percent of patients.

Now, 10 years later and cancer-free, Feinstein, 55, says he has spent a lot of time thinking about cancer, about mortality, about life.

“When the machzor asks the question, ‘Who will live and who will die?’ it occurred to me that the answer is ‘me.’ I will. Who by fire and who by water, who in his time and who before his time? Me. To every one of those things in the prayer, the answer to the question is ‘me.’ That prayer is talking about what it means to be finite, mortal human beings who try to live in the world with joy and with hope, knowing that death is a very real part of human experience and existence,” said Feinstein, rabbi at VBS, a Conservative congregation with 1,700 families.

But the frailty of existence does not depress him.

“If you really want to know what the whole tradition is about, it’s about choosing life. When I was a seminary student, I thought that was a strange mitzvah. Who wouldn’t choose life? But what I discovered — what cancer taught me — is that this is the hardest mitzvah in the book to keep…. The whole tradition is teaching us to have the courage to choose life, even when it’s really scary, even when it’s really dark outside and inside, even when you don’t know if you’re going to make it to your daughter’s bat mitzvah. Choose to get up, come into the world. Work. Love. Laugh, dream, and don’t give up.”

Feinstein acknowledges that while he said and believed those things before he had cancer, he didn’t understand them fully until death was looming.

“There is a line dissecting humanity. On one side, where most people live, is a world where you worry about who is going to win on ‘American Idol’ and ‘Dancing With the Stars,’ and you get upset with traffic jams and slow service in restaurants.

“Then, on the other side of the line, are all of us who know that life is short and finite and terribly, terribly fragile, and we’ve decided not to let those things upset us anymore. We deal with a whole different set of realities about what is important in life,” he said.

When Rabbi Feinstein sits in a traffic jam, he tells himself he’ll be late, but also that he’s alive and healthy and has a wonderful wife and children. He also no longer sits on countless committees that take up his time, and he admits to having no patience for what he views as trivialities — such as complaints about how many aliyahs the bar mitzvah family can get.

“‘You’re here, you’re healthy, your kid is celebrating, your parents are here. You have nothing to complain about.’ People become so irritated with all the details of the simcha, that they forget what a simcha is and what the alternative is,” he said. 

The enormity of his blessings constantly hit him — his kids made fun of him for how much he cried at their bar and bat mitzvahs. And he loves the way he is aging.

“When you’re on the other side of the line, growing old is something to be fought, it’s all about looking younger,” he said. “All I wanted, all I prayed for when I was sick, was for the opportunity to grow old.”

American culture, he said, likes to hide illness, tragedy and death, and call such instances a crisis, rather than acknowledge that at some point everyone will get hit. That willful blindness, he said, can only lead to despair when something does happen.

“The greatest sin is despair. It isn’t idolatry or blasphemy. It’s to give up on life and on hope and on tomorrow. The greatest sign of faith is the moral courage to live with hope, knowing that I don’t have an infinite number of tomorrows. I still want to embrace my kids, my friends, my world. I want to love. I want to live. I want to laugh. And I won’t let go.”

Anne Brener

Cancer wasn’t the first trauma Rabbi Anne Brener faced. Her mother committed suicide when Brener was 24, and her only sister died in a car accident just a few months later.

Brener, now 61, has dedicated her life to healing, personally and professionally, working for decades as a pioneer in the Jewish healing movement and writing a book on the subject, “Mourning and Mitzvah — A Guided Journal for Walking the Mourner’s Path Through Grief to Healing” (Jewish Lights, 1993 & 2001).

But even with all that experience, she was still surprised by how clearly she understood what she had to do when she was diagnosed with uterine leiomyosarcoma nearly four years ago.

She had to yield.

“I’ve heard so many people say ‘I had cancer but I didn’t let it slow me down.’ Well, why not? My life has hit me with something that makes me question what it means to be human; it’s given me the opportunity to confront my mortality,” she said. “What is it going to take for us to recognize that we are souls traveling through time?”

So she let the doctors deal with her body, while she cared for her soul.

Brener is a psychotherapist and spiritual counselor in private practice, as well as a faculty member at the Academy for Jewish Religion, California. She was also a rabbinical student at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute for Religion, in Los Angeles, at the time, but she adjusted her schedule to take time for herself to rest, exercise, meditate, pray, read, study and write (including columns for The Jewish Journal). She drew on the help and support of her daughter, friends and community, who heeded her signals for when to hold her close and when to leave her alone.

Chemotherapy didn’t make her too sick, she said, and so, as a result, she considers her bout with cancer a time of great healing and spiritual growth.

Moving to a place of depth shouldn’t require major trauma, Brener believes.

She cites one of her teachers, Berkeley therapist Stanley Kelleman, who taught that every person faces thousands of little daily deaths — making that tough phone call, taking that risk, surviving embarrassment. The trick, Brener said, is to recognize those moments and use them to build up muscle for the bigger shocks to come.

“We don’t give enough space to our experiences and challenges, whether they’re little challenges or big challenges. We don’t have enough rituals and we don’t take the time to go back to our previous experiences and ask ‘What have I learned?’” she said. “I think people don’t know that the trauma they experienced when their parents uprooted them when they were in junior high school, and they had to leave all their friends and move into a new town, can help them now when someone they love dies, or they get sick.”

Those who don’t take the time to understand how their mind and spirit process challenge, or to explore what they believe to be the most meaningful elements of their lives, will be blindsided when trauma inevitably hits, and might be leading a less meaningful existence than they could be.

In her classes, with clients and in her book, Brener points to the mourner’s path in the Holy Temple in ancient Jerusalem, set aside not only for those mourning the death of a close relative, but for those who have faced illness, financial loss or displacement — in other words, nearly everyone at some point. Those who were suffering found camaraderie, and the mourners path made mortality and loss a normal and visible part of daily life — a sharp contrast to the American Pollyanna gestalt.

“Today’s comforter is tomorrow’s mourner, and today’s mourner is tomorrow’s comforter,” Brener said. “But we live in a culture that doesn’t acknowledge that, where illness and death are aberrations,” she said.

Her cancer also taught her to live life fully immersed in the moment and to recognize the uncertainty and mystery inherent in every situation. Rather than allowing that uncertainty to make her fearful — though she knows that her cancer is likely to come back, though she knows what it is to walk on life’s narrow bridge described by Rebbe Nachman — she says it makes her open to how each new circumstance may unfold. She sees doors rather than walls, she said, referring to a question posed in Song of Songs.

“When I come upon a challenge, or come upon something some would say is tragic, I don’t assume anymore, because my life has taught me that everything is a possible door into something new and unimagined,” she said.

 

David Wolpe

When Rabbi David Wolpe was in chemotherapy three years ago, the most important thing he felt he could do, when he could lift himself off the couch, was get up in front of his congregation as often as possible while he was bald.

“The chance to stand in front of people and say not just that being bald isn’t the worst thing in the world, and that chemo isn’t the worst thing in the world — as awful as it can be — but that this doesn’t destroy my faith and doesn’t change the way I feel about Judaism and about God, that for me was very precious,” said Wolpe, who leads Sinai Temple, a 2,200-family Conservative congregation in Westwood.

Wolpe, 51, has unenviable cancer credentials. His wife was diagnosed with cancer when their daughter, Samara, was an infant. Surgery and treatment cured her, but left her unable to have more children. In 2003, Wolpe suffered a grand mal seizure from what he later found out was a benign brain tumor that had to be surgically removed. Then, in 2006, a swelling in his abdomen turned out to be non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.

Wolpe is currently in remission, but there is no cure.

“For me, the future is always in conditional tense,” he said. “People talk about the future with great confidence — about children, grandchildren, weddings, bar mitzvahs. Once you’re sick, you lose that.”

But what you gain, he said, is a sharper understanding of how to spend, and not to spend, your days.

“It’s easy to live as though you have forever,” he said, citing a line from Jean-Paul Sartre’s “The Wall,” “but it’s a terrible mistake, because you don’t. And people don’t realize that on a visceral level until they face their own death.”

Having cancer allowed Wolpe to understand, and to teach, the power of acknowledging blessings.

“I don’t believe that God guarantees you good health, and I don’t believe that getting sick takes away all the many, many blessings that I have,” Wolpe said. “I’ve had people come in and say ‘Why me?’ when something [bad] happens, but I’ve never had someone say ‘I was born in the richest country on Earth, and I’ve never been hungry; why me?’ or, ‘I have a beautiful child; why me?’ Despite the cancer, I feel enormously blessed. Everyone knows that lesson, and when you say it, they acknowledge it, but when you say it when things are going badly, it has more power.”

His faith in God has not been shaken by his struggle, he writes in his most recent book, “Why Faith Matters” (HaperCollins, 2008). Rather, it has renewed his conviction that faith pushes people to be better, to give more of themselves and bring more light into the world.

“The single greatest lesson that cancer reinforces is that the quality of your life is the quality of your connections: connections to other people, whom — as well as what — do you love,” he said. Family, friends, community — each take on new meaning. Relationships with things like nature, or, for Wolpe, books, reveal themselves to be key components of living life well.

“If you can figure that out before you get sick, that is a wonderful gift of emotional wisdom,” he said.

Yom Kippur tries to push worshippers to that place not only with prayers that focus on mortality, but by imposing requirements to imitate corpses — no eating or drinking, wearing white, like shrouds. Going to a funeral, Wolpe says, can also bring a person to look death in the eye.

“Sometimes, for a second, they have a glimpse that this will be their fate as well, and they wonder, OK, so with whatever time I have left, what do I want to do? It focuses and sharpens the mind, and it should pull you away from trivia.”

Cancer has taught him, he said, to embrace pain and to not fear death.

“The things that matter a lot can come with pain, and pain is not bad or destructive or to be feared,” Wolpe said. “In some ways, the more you insulate yourself from pain, the more things will hurt you, and the more things you’ll be constantly afraid of, whereas if you have a little less fear because you have a little more pain, you actually are freer to move about in the world.”

 

 

John Rosove

Forty-eight hours stand out in Rabbi John Rosove’s seven-month bout with cancer. On a Friday afternoon last February, the doctor who had performed Rosove’s biopsy called and told the rabbi of Temple Israel of Hollywood that he had advanced prostate cancer and that the prognosis was dire.

“I needed to be scraped off the floor. I thought I was done. I thought I wouldn’t see my kids grow up, and that I wouldn’t see grandchildren, that I wouldn’t have retirement. This was like a bolt out of hell,” said Rosove, 59.

Rosove’s brother, an oncologist, calmed him somewhat, but it wasn’t until that Sunday evening that Rosove spoke to a specialist who had viewed his pathology reports. The doctor told Rosove there was great reason to believe this cancer would not kill him. Two months later Rosove, who has led the 950-family Reform congregation for 21 years, underwent successful surgery that revealed that his cancer had not spread. He will complete eight weeks of radiation therapy two days after Yom Kippur.

Rosove vacillates between still wanting to exact physical revenge on that first doctor, and wanting to thank him.

“He robbed me of hope — I thought I had a couple years to live,” he said. “But I also confronted my mortality in a way I had never been forced to before, and I’ve been somewhat dealing with that fact ever since.”

Rosove said the brush with death has greatly affected his perspective.

“This episode didn’t change me dramatically, rather it enhanced what I already was. It deepened everything,” he said. “I’ve always been a grateful person, and I’m even more grateful now. I’ve always been aware that I don’t have control, ultimately, over anything, and I’m even more aware of that now. The only control we have is our attitude — and choosing life.”

He now takes more time for himself, reading and studying or doing things that make him happy, like spending time with his wife and kids, getting in a round of golf, playing with his dog, listening to music. He and his wife, now empty-nesters, have gone through the calendar, blocking out time to travel and spend time with the people important in their lives in the coming year. He hopes to go to Israel for an upcoming sabbatical.

And he has trimmed the things that used to suck his energy — problems in the synagogue that others can handle, giving too much of his attention to overly needy congregants.

His faith, he said, is strong, and he never blamed God. Rather, he has found more meaning in prayers and sees godliness in all the people who rallied around him — brilliant doctors, angelic nurses, a supportive community and a loving family.

Still, there were some very dark moments.

In the two months between diagnosis and surgery, Rosove says he was angry and deeply depressed.

“I was raw and anxious, and I felt like I couldn’t really take care of anyone else before the surgery,” he said. 

At first he confided in only a few colleagues and the top lay leaders at Temple Israel, feeling the need for privacy and knowing it would be destabilizing for the community to see its rabbi stricken.

Immediately following the surgery, he sent a letter to all congregants, telling them the news and the good prognosis.

He said he won’t be speaking over the High Holy Days directly about his struggle for life, but he knows the themes he has learned through his cancer will be present in his sermons — the need to live every moment with purpose, to understand that a lifetime is finite, that a soul needs nurturing as much as a body does.

Over the past several weeks, when Rosove has gone for his daily 7 a.m. dose of radiation, he has started the regimen with a Zen meditation that focuses him on being fully present in the moment.

He sees a similar message in the period starting at Rosh Hashanah and ending in Yom Kippur.

“We have 10 days of life, from birth to death to renewal, and all you can do is be where you are and not try to be anywhere else. We are so fragmented and we usually have anxiety and things that trouble us, whether it’s economic, or family relationships or whatever those things are that legitimately concern us. But we can’t be of help to anyone else if we’re fragmented. We have to be fully who we are and where we are,” he said. 

Where he is now is a place of gratitude and hope, he said. But he admits he doesn’t know whether he could have gotten here if his prognosis had not been as good.

“I look for inspiration everywhere. The positive role models for me are the people who wrestle with God and who struggle, but who stay positive,” Rosove said. “I have so many of those people around me, and that is one of the blessings of being in a community like this.”

Facing Death, How Do You Live? Read More »

A New Year’s Resolution: Choose Civility

Having shepherded hundreds of people through Jewish leadership workshops, I am asked frequently why we don’t have better, more competent Jewish leaders, lay and professional, in our institutions.

My answer: We don’t deserve them.

It’s often said that people get the leaders they deserve. Because we have made it so hard to lead, good people often don’t get involved. They reserve their precious time for institutional affiliations that will not become mired down in vitriolic arguments, uncivil debates, name-calling and negativity. As Jews, we’re not always good followers.

At a regional conference for Jewish communal professionals a few months ago, I asked a room of 200 people by a show of hands how many of them had experienced an egregiously hostile encounter with a layperson over the course of the past year. From where I was standing, it looked like everyone in the room had a hand raised.

So I changed the question: “Has anyone in this room not had an egregiously hostile encounter with a lay leader this past year?” One person raised a hand. I asked him to stand up so that we could all congratulate him.

It’s not only the lay-professional relationship that is suffering. Internal work cultures can also become acidic. Sadly, we’ve created atmospheres of incivility where it becomes very hard for leaders to lead. It’s not only their failure; it’s also ours. We’ve created a consumer-savvy culture where if we don’t like something we take it back, return it or exchange it. And it has spilled over into our interactions on other levels.

Listen to people in an institution complain: “If you don’t get rid of this teacher, I’m pulling my kid from this school.” Or, “I don’t like this program. I’m revoking my membership.”

Consumers do that. Stakeholders don’t.

When things go wrong and we see leaders as the sole owners of our Jewish institutions, they become an easy target. But if we all saw ourselves as owners, investors and stakeholders in institutions, problems no longer belong to someone else. They belong to us. We each become more personally accountable. And we become more civil in the process because we understand up close how hard it is to navigate politics thoughtfully.

It’s difficult to move people out of their comfort zone, but as one leadership guru says, resistance is information. People naturally push back when leaders push them.

People should push back if change is authentic and the environments we create are diverse and tolerant. The question is not one of quashing resistance; it’s how we push back that has become the problem. We don’t need to say everything that we think. We need to teach ourselves what not to say in order to challenge leaders without humiliating them. When they feel denigrated, we all lose.

The medieval Spanish poet Solomon Ibn Gabirol is attributed with the following aphorism: “In seeking wisdom, the first step is silence, the second, listening, the third, remembering, the fourth, practicing, the fifth, teaching others.”

If we were able to apply this five-step process, we could create a sea change in leadership and followship cultures. Silence and listening would force us to hear the pain of leaders who just want out. We need to hear others and hear ourselves when we’ve gotten out of line, when we need to apologize and when we just need to stop interrupting.

If we are able to remember and practice that which we know has worked historically, we could use more sane and civil methods of achieving our goals.

Lastly, Ibn Gabirol has asked us to become teachers. We all can be teachers of civility. When we are spoken to badly, we must create educable moments and let people know that we can’t hear them when we are addressed in a way that is beneath our dignity, no matter who we are or where they stand in an organizational culture.

We need to affirm that Jewish institutional life is about creating warm, nurturing and welcoming environments, and that we have a zero-tolerance policy for the use of any language that goes against the ethos of our Jewish values.

We lovingly own this enterprise called Jewish life. We can’t give it up or give it back or exchange it. We can, however, do a lot to dignify it.

Erica Brown is the director of adult education for the Partnership for Jewish Life and Learning, which serves as a catalyst for lifelong learning and identity-building experiences in the Greater Washington area.

A New Year’s Resolution: Choose Civility Read More »

Rosh Hashana: the Listening Holiday

Rosh Hashana is a Listening Holiday.
In contrast to the other holiday, which I would classify more as seeing holidays. 

Let me explain.  In the Biblical times, for the festivals of Sukkot, Shavuot, and Pesach, the Jewish people are commanded to go on a pilgrimage to the Temple in Jerusalem.  It is the pilgrimage to the Temple which forms the central act of observance.  And on their journey, the Jewish people are commanded on these three occasions to see the divine,—“reiyat panim.” To see God’s face.
And, if you think about the holidays, the rituals associated with Pescah, Shavout and Sukkot all involve seeing—the lulav and etrog on Sukkot are supposed to look a certain way.  The seder plate must appear at the center of the seder table on Pesach, and seeing the inside of the Torah is central to Shavuot.

In contrast, the fundamental principle of Rosh Hashanah is listening as manifested through the requirement to hear the shofar. The shofar—the central ritual of Rosh Hahsana. 

The truth is, it wasn’t always so clear that the primary obligation of the day is to hear the shofar. 
There’s an interesting disagreement about whether the blessing we say before blowing the shofar should be a blessing on blowing the shofar or a blessing on hearing the shofar.  Is the primary obligation to blow the shofar or to hear the shofar.  The blessing of course is :
“Blessed are You, Hashem,Our God, King of the world, who sanctified us through His commandments and commanded us to hear the sound of the Shofar”
ברוך אתה ה’אלהינו מלך העולם אשר קדשנו במצותיו וצונו לשמוע קול שופר
It is a blessing over the sound—the cries of tekiya, shevarim and truah.
The essence of the mitzvah of shofar is not the blowing in of itself, but it is about hearing the sound emanating from the shofar. 

And yet, the first day of Rosh Hashana coincides with Shabbat, and there is no shofar. On Shabbat, we don’t blow shofar lest we come to carry the shofar and desecrate Shabbat observance.  The holiness of Shabbat overrides the shofar blast.

So, if the central mitzvah of the day is shofar, if the entire day centers around listening, how can we possibly have a spiritually meaningful experience without the sounds of the shofar blasts?

I would like to suggest that Rosh Hashan is always, with or without the shofar, fundamentally a holiday about listening and hearing. 

On the first day, we read the story of Sara and of Channa, two women who were barren. God remembered them, he heard their cries, and rewarded them with children.  In the powerful unetaneh tokef prayer, we are told that god is found in kol d’mama dakah yishma—God’s presence is heard in a still, thin sound.  If we just open ourselves to hear, even in the stillness, we will hear gd’s presence reverberate.  And we declare in the malchiyut section of musaf:—Shema Yisrael Hashem Elokeinu Hashem Ehad.  Hear Oh Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One.  It is a plea to Israel to Listen. Not only to hear, but to listen.  We should hear, and listen to what others say. Hear and listen to our own inner voice. And hear and then listen for God’s voice. 

And so, when one does not have a shofar with which to hear, we must still find ways to listen. 

The Talmud (Rosh Hashana 27b) relates the following strange scenario:
“If one blows (Shofar) into a pit … if the sound of the Shofar is heard, the mitzvah has been fulfilled, but if the sound of the echo is heard, the mitzvah has not been fulfilled.
התוקע לתוך הבור, או לתוך הדות, או לתוך הפיטס, אם קול שופר שמע – יצא, ואם קול הברה שמע – לא יצא.
One who blows but does not hear the sound of Shofar does not fulfill his obligation;
hence, once who blows into a ditch and hears only an echo falls short of fulfilling the Mitzvah, as the echo is not considered the sound of the actual Shofar.
I would like to read this metaphorically.  Perhaps, what’s important here, is to hear the actual sounds of the shofar, to listen with complete intent.  Hearing remnants, parts or pieces of the sounds is considered insufficient listening.  The echo is distant, far off and distorts the actual sound.  And so too with that which surrounds us.  We must not hear the echoes of what others say to us, but rather, we are meant to hear and listen completely, with our entire body and soul.

There’s a children’s story written by Joan Fassler, a child psychologist, called “The Boy with a Problem.”  In it, Johnny has a problem.  Now the book never reveals his problem. But the problem grows bigger and bigger each day. Johnny goes to a doctor to discuss his problem, and the doctor gives him a little pill. But the problem does not go away. Then he tried to tell his teacher, who suggests n art project but the problem does not go away.  He tries to tell his mother, who says kids shouldn’t worry so much.  But the problem does not go away.  And each time rather than listen to him, they attempt to offer a solution that does not help.  Until one day, his friend, Peter, asks him what is wrong. And Johnny tells him the problem, and Peter listens. He listens all the way up the hill, and then all the way down the hill until Johnny suddenly doesn’t feel like he has a problem anymore. 

Peter teaches us the simple, yet crucial art of listening.  Imagine what it would be like to really listen. To listen to our inner voices. To listen to others. and to listen for the quiet still voice of god.   

So what are we supposed to be listening for on this Rosh Hashana?  I suggest that this first day of Rosh Hashana that is also Shabbat, at each point when the shofar is meant to sound, pause.  Give yourself the opportunity to just listen.  To listen to what those whom we love are saying. To listen to our own inner voices. And to listen for the voice of God.

Rosh Hashana: the Listening Holiday Read More »

Tony Blair talks with pope’s newspaper about converting

Remember when former British Prime Minister Tony Blair converted from following the Church of England to following the pope? Well, now he’s given a lengthy interview to the papal newspaper, Osservatore Romano, about his conversion to Catholicism and how faith in God inspires his life.

I don’t read Italian, but if you do here’s the original. Otherwise, here’s some analysis from the Jesuit magazine America:

It was his wife Cherie—“extremely active”, he says, in the Catholic student organizations at university, where they met—who was the driving force behind his decision to become a Catholic two years ago, a few months after resigning as prime minister. But the decision to be received by the Catholic Church, says Blair, was the fruit of a long process:

“My spiritual journey began when I began going to Mass with my wife. And when we decided to baptize our children in the Catholic faith. It’s a path which has taken 25 years, and maybe longer. Over time, emotionally, intellectually and rationally it became clear that the Catholic Church was the right home for me. But it happened after a very long period of time. When I left my political post, and no longer had all the tensions linked to being prime minister, it was something I wanted to do.”

But I was interested to see that he also cites a 2003 Mass celebrated by John Paul II for the Blair family in the Pope’s private chapel. “It remains even now a very vivid memory,” he says, “an event which touched me deeply. Of course, very probably I was very close at that point to converting, but it was undoubtedly an important stage in the process which ultimately confirmed my decison.”

More from America here.

Tony Blair talks with pope’s newspaper about converting Read More »

LETTERS: September 18-24, 2009

Wagner’s Legacy

Three cheers for Rabbi Harold Schulweis’ conscience and courage in his article in defying political correctness by refusing to insulate Richard Wagner’s music from his virulent anti-Semitism (“Let Wagner Be Heard?” Aug. 28). For you music lovers who would sanitize Wagner’s works from his expressed bigotry, let me ask: If Hitler were a renowned artist, or Charles Manson an accomplished sculptor, would you support and attend an art show promoting their works? Or, as an alternative, would you at least insist that the program notes include specific reference to their non-artistic “contributions” to society?

Murray Geller
Woodland Hills

Even if Rabbi Schulweis’ column was not totally accurate, LA Opera board member E. Randol Schoenberg misses the real point (Letters, Sept. 4). Schoenberg admits that Wagner’s anti-Semitism is “abhorrent.” The real question is why should any Jew attend a concert, opera or anything else composed by any anti-Semite — or, for that matter, support any organization that promotes works by such an anti-Semite?

Paul Jeser
Los Angeles

In response to E. Randol Schoenberg’s “Letter to the Editor,” Sept. 4, written in response to Rabbi Harold Schulweis’s opinion article, “Let Wagner Be Heard?” (Aug. 28), with reference to Schoenberg’s cover story, “Why Wagner’s Music Deserves a Second Chance,” Feb. 20 — It doesn’t really matter if Wagner personally knew Houston Stewart Chamberlain or not. Wagner was an anti-Semite who advocated genocide of the Jewish people. His widow Cosima echoed his views and befriended Chamberlain who married Wagner’s daughter and became a close ally to Adolf Hitler. If anything, this shows the direct line from Wagner to Hitler, and it shows that the Wagner family could have cleaned up its famous relative’s legacy but chose to taint that legacy for eternity instead. Wagner was, therefore, no “ordinary” anti-Semite as Schoenberg contends.

And who is E. Randol Schoenberg to rate Wagner’s genius as a composer anyway? Schoenberg may be the grandson of composer Arnold Schoenberg, but that doesn’t make him a musician, musicologist or expert on music. He is an attorney, and the arguments he made in his “Letter to the Editor” are those of an attorney.

To bring “Here Comes the Bride” from “Lohengrin” into the argument is preposterous. There are distinct ties between Wagner’s writings and his characterizations, librettos and music. He created Jewish caricatures like Beckmesser in “Die Meistersinger” and Alberich and Mime in the “Ring.” He incorporated his feelings of Aryanism and German nationalism into Hans Sachs’s final aria in “Die Meistersinger” when Sachs asks the German mastersingers to keep their art pure, free of foreigners, meaning Jews.

Wagner, the man, and Wagner, the composer, are one. He often said that he was creating a “total work of art.” The man and his music are linked together no matter how much Mr. Schoenberg wants to compartimentalize them. And we in a civilized society do not honor such troubled individuals with celebrations.

Schoenberg is so brainwashed by his lust for Wagner’s music that he has lost touch with reality. I think that Schoenberg needs to return to this earth and become a Jew again.

Carol Jean Delmar
Via email


Heath Care Reform

As always, my teacher and friend, Rabbi Elliot Dorff, was able to provide a sound, compassionate and wisdom-filled Jewish argument for a pressing social issue of our time (“Why We Must Support Universal Health Care,” Aug. 28). Through the use of sources, and with the gentle approach that has become a hallmark of his career, Rabbi Dorff gave me the moral backing and support for universal health care that I needed to preach in my own congregation. By not taking sides on the policy, but rather on the overall principle, Rabbi Dorff called on all of us to recognize the lack of humanity that currently exists in our broken health care system.

I plan to be leading a vigil for health care reform in our Pasadena community in October, and urge my rabbinic colleagues around Los Angeles and beyond to do the same.

Rabbi Joshua Levine Grater
Pasadena

Rabbi Dorff’s attempt at advancing a politically controversial agenda like Universal Healthcare (“Why We Must Support Universal Health Care,” Aug. 28) by tying it to Jewish tradition is despicable.

Admitting there is no mention of anything resembling Universal Healthcare in the Torah, Dorff then clouds the issue by referencing unrelated laws, like the redemption of captives. Dorff speaks of the Jewish rule listing priorities for whom we are responsible: ourselves first, followed by family, community, etc.  But Universal Healthcare removes the power from the individual to make important decisions for himself and gives it to bureaucrats, which is why so many Canadians and Europeans come to the U.S. for life-saving operations denied them by their own governments. He also doesn’t explain where on that list falls the twenty million citizens of Mexico, El Salvador, and elsewhere that the left includes in their number of forty million uninsured “Americans”.

Finally, he raises the issue of Judaism’s objection to preferential treatment of the individual over society. Yet, the politicians pushing Universal Healthcare will continue to retain their excellent health insurance.

Religion has nothing to do with this issue and Dorff should not use his position as a rabbi to promote his political agenda.

Daniel Iltis
Los Angeles

I wish to give a different perspective on the brilliant and well-written article by my colleague and friend, Rabbi Elliot N. Dorff. The United States of America was created upon the concept that the very foundation of human dignity is the ability to make choices about the things that affect our lives.

We all agree that the present state of affairs in health care delivery is simply not defensible. The debate is over the solution to the problem. We need to preserve a situation in which the patient can be an aggressive consumer with choices. We do not need a Canadian or British system in which the patient is a supplicant who is supposed to be humbly grateful for any miserable breadcrumbs thrown his/her way.

We are witnessing the largest grass-roots rebellion in American history. Citizens are telling politicians, “Hey, you work for us!” Our citizenry wants a government that protects its people not one that preys upon them.

Rabbi Louis J. Feldman
Van Nuys


Leadership Training

The Jewish Journal featured two stories reflecting on the unfortunate closing of the Professional Leaders Project (PLP) (“A Break in the Pipeline” and “Face of a Crisis,” Aug. 28). This is indeed a loss, not only for the L.A. Jewish community but for the broader Jewish communal eco-system, and it is a chilling reminder of the vulnerability of even well-supported Jewish start-ups.

While PLP had a unique vision, the depth of the L.A. Jewish community suggests that at least some of its programmatics might be continued by other organizations, including The Federation’s NextGen program, the Jewish Communal Professionals of Southern California’s mentorship program, Jumpstart’s support network for young and innovative Jewish entrepreneurs, and, of course, the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion’s (HUC-JIR) School of Jewish Communal Service, which specializes in the training of Jewish professional leaders.

It is particularly relevant that the new strategic plan of HUC-JIR’s School of Jewish Communal Service calls for the creation of a Center for Jewish Communal Leadership that explicitly responds to the impending “leadership deficit” noted by Shawn Landres. In cooperation with the above organizations and others, and mobilizing the resources of the executive management programs at USC, the School of Jewish Communal Service will be launching a number of new initiatives over the course of the coming years to upgrade the skill sets and leadership talents of Jewish professionals and lay leaders in the L.A. area. As we build the Center for Jewish Communal Leadership, we hope to work to insure that PLP important work continues even after the project officially closes its doors.

Richard A. Siegel
Los Angeles


Nazarian’s Philanthropy

Writer Danielle Berrin and The Jewish Journal editors missed a crucial opportunity to inform its readers about the charitable works of Sam Nazarian and his family’s foundation (“Drive, Daring and Family Legacy,” Sept. 4). While describing Nazarian as a hard worker born into wealth, your story left me and other readers with a one-dimensional portrayal of a vapid, money-hungry, deal-seeking, expensive-car-driving, jet-setting, 34-year-old bachelor, and I am wondering if that is actually the case or just the intent of The Jewish Journal’s story. Do you and Berrin think a story of wealth is what we are seeking as readers? I was far more interested and gratified to read Susie Kopecky’s article about a Jewish education program for special needs adults (“Judaism Through Arts for Adults With Special Needs,” Sept. 4). Why not use your precious space to inspire and motivate us to help others?

Ellen Brown
via e-mail


Iran Talks

What a coincidence! On the very day I read The Jewish Journal, which includes editor Eshman’s outrage about Vahidi being appointed defense minister for Iran (“Marking Outrage,” Sept. 11), the Obama administration announces it will talk to the Iranians. Thus, the administration has achieved a victory. The Mullahs will talk (yippee)! Heading the Iranian side will be undoubtedly Ahmadinejad and Vahidi.

My suggestion for the American side is Jimmy Carter (of course) and maybe one or two of your columnists and maybe that rabbi from Tikkun Magazine. It is time to wake up to the danger facing the Israelis from this amateur and naive bunch in Washington 80 percent of the Jewish people voted for.

Mark Steinberg
Los Angeles


Neve Gordon

The letter titled “Tolerance for Dissent?” (Sept. 4) is misguided on so many levels I hardly know where to begin to break it down.

Neve Gordon is not just a simple professor, as he wants us to believe, who has come to his homeland-bashing honestly and after much handwringing — so much so that his conscience just won’t let him refrain from speaking out against Israel’s atrocities. Neve Gordon, along with other heinous acts, is the same man who holed himself up in protest together with Yasser Arafat, the mass-murderer of so many Jews, during the siege of Ramallah. Not only should he be dismissed from Ben-Gurion University, he should be tried for treason. Israel’s Declaration of Independence and its inherent freedoms only go so far, as does America’s and any other democracy. No, professor David N. Myers and friends, this kind of subversion should never be tolerated, even in the most open of democracies. 

Myers, Gordon and other educators, including the other signers of this letter, need to be advocates for Israel. We desperately need them. Yes, there are injustices on both sides and even if you don’t agree that the Arab/Palestinian abhorrent behavior is over-the-top disproportionate in rhetoric and action, there are plenty people all over the world jumping all over us. We need you, as Jews and teachers, with access to young, impressionable minds, to advocate and campaign for your own people.

Allan Kandel
Los Angeles

Neve Gordon, Rabbi Leonard Beerman, professor David N. Myers and their academic colleagues are frustrated that “every Israeli government has continued to build settlements since 1967 in defiance of international law.” Question to them: Arab countries started aggressions against Israel in 1948, 1967 and 1972. Were they acting according to the international law?

Israel captured the territories in self-defense, in response to aggression by Egypt, Syria and Jordan. It also significant that U.N. Resolution 242 does not require complete Israel withdrawal from territories. The Oslo accords recognize Israel’s right to remain in territories, at least until a final settlement is reached. The notion that there is an illegal Israeli “occupation” is a myth. But why are you using this falsehood? I think, in spite of your education, you simply do not understand who is the aggressor and who is a victim.

Boris Blansky
West Hollywood

Regarding “Professor” Neve Gordon. I consider Gordon’s comments calling Israel an “apartheid” state not freedom of speech, but a lie. What next? A “Nazi” state? I think one appropriate answer to him would be to deduct all lost donations from his salary!

Cecilia Rosenthal
Santa Monica


Kill Wilhelm

Even 12-year-old Jewish girls have Holocaust revenge fantasies (“Kill Wilhelm,” Aug. 28), especially growing up in Austria with a mom who survived Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen. So now, at 58, driving with my family from Amsterdam through Germany and Poland, I was sure to have outgrown those childish impulses.

We were on our way to celebrate my mom’s 80th birthday in Krynica, a small mountain resort about two hours from Krakow, three hours from Auschwitz. The restaurant she picked was newly remodeled, very rustic and clean, in the middle of the forest. The food was delicious and fresh.

Someone in our group noticed a big wooden plaque in the entrance hall. The words were in Polish. My mom translated: “When a Jew enters, hold on to your pockets.”

We took the sign off the wall and told the waiters that we were all Jews and found it offensive. I don’t know if our broken Polish made any sense to them, but just to make sure, we drove by again a week later, on our way home. The sign was gone.

Dwora Fried
via e-mail


Two Cities

David N. Myers (“Jerusalem 2009: A Tale of Two Cities,” Aug. 14) may be a professor of Jewish history but he is biased; he is pro-Arab, thus will twist the truth and the facts on the ground about Israel’s position in Jerusalem so he can earn a point with the position he takes.

There is a lot more property in Jerusalem the Arabs stole from Jews and it must be returned to its legal owners; one case at the time.

Jerusalem is not “A Tale of Two Cities.” From 1949 to 1967 Jordan illegally occupied part of the city and created the grounds for Israel’s Jerusalem and the ‘other’ city under Jordan’s occupation. Since 1967, it is one city, the capital of the State of Israel.

The Semitic root of the name Jerusalem, or Yerushaláyim means peace, harmony or completeness. The city’s history goes back to the 4th millennium BCE, making it one of the oldest cities in the world. Jerusalem is the holiest city in Judaism and the spiritual center of the Jewish people.

The expression, “Judaize” Jerusalem, an expression the Arabs use, is most insolent and borders on Anti-Semitism. More so, where does Myers dig the unfounded claim that Israel is making efforts to rid Jerusalem of its Arab residents?

Jerusalem does not need to be “Judaized.” Jews built the city as their capital and since its inception Jerusalem has been and is part of the Jewish Nation’s history. Throughout history Jews lived in the city. Jews like Myers. Arabs and their ilk who want to deny the Jews’ claim or right to Jerusalem parrot the Arabs’ malicious expression, “Judaizing” Jerusalem.

What is annoying the most is that a paper named the “Jewish Journal” constantly publishes anti Israel articles.

Without Jerusalem there is no Israel! There is no Jewish people!

Nurit Greenger
Los Angeles


Boycott Israel

Just read your article about boycotting the Arabs (“Boycott Israel” Nope: Boycott the Arabs,” Aug. 20).

How about not boycotting anyone along group lines? The would be a move towards no longer thinking of people in terms of a dichotomy – but rather in terms of who they are: humans.

There are good Jews and bad Jews. Good Arabs and Bad Arabs. Good….and bad… and so it goes on. It is the thinking in terms of groups that perpetuates this endless conflict that will never end until people refuse to think in such terms.

People were horrified by the recent hero’s welcome afforded the bomber who returned to Libya recently. Does one put this down to genes? I.e. the Libyans have bad genes that cause them to think in such a way? No it boiled down to nothing other than group think – and anti-Western at that. Anti-Arab thought breeds anti-Western thought and vice-versa. The hero’s welcome was because of a hatred for the West and the way it has “group-treated” the Arab world.

Your suggestion means simply more polarization. Boycott bad people. Not groups.

David Watermeyer
Seoul


Corrections

Due to an error at our printers, a portion of “Portrait of a Fashion Diva as Human Being,” by Naomi Pfefferman, did not appear in the Sept. 11 print issue. The full article appears at jewishjournal.com.

In “Economy Forces Tough Dues Decisions for Congregants, Synagogues” (Sept. 4), the membership of Beth Jacob was incorrectly stated. Beth Jacob has approximately 750 member families.

THE JEWISH JOURNAL welcomes letters from all readers. Letters should be no more than 200 words and must include a valid name, address and phone number. Letters sent via e-mail must not contain attachments. Pseudonyms and initials will not be used, but names will be withheld on request. We reserve the right to edit all letters. Mail: The Jewish Journal, Letters, 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1510, Los Angeles, CA 90010; e-mail: {encode=”letters@jewishjournal.com” title=”letters@jewishjournal.com”}; or fax: (213) 368-1684.

 

LETTERS: September 18-24, 2009 Read More »

Give J a Chance

The people trying to discredit J Street, the new left-leaning pro-Israel lobbying group, are using many of the same tactics Barack Obama’s opponents used to try to derail his presidential campaign. I have one question for them: How’d that work out?

J Street got a big boost this week as the subject of a top story in The New York Times Sunday Magazine, the country’s largest Jewish weekly. J Street’s founding director, Jeremy Ben-Ami, landed his full-on portrait inside the magazine.

Two days before, he appeared, in three dimensions, in my office for our first-ever meeting. Ben-Ami has impeccable Zionist yichus — his grandparents were among the first settlers of what would become Tel Aviv, and his father, Yitzhak Ben-Ami, was an activist for the militant pre-state Irgun movement. But Ben-Ami himself, a deputy domestic-policy adviser during Bill Clinton’s first term, is as youthful and wonky as a well-written “West Wing” character. So it helps his and J Street’s street cred that he’s making the rounds with Colette Avital, a longtime, no-nonsense Israeli pol with the right accent, who once served as her country’s consul general in New York.

J Street sees itself as a corrective to what it considers the monolithic, right-leaning voice of AIPAC. In his conversation with me, Ben-Ami was careful to praise AIPAC as an effective lobbying group on Israel’s behalf. But too often, he said, it has marched in lockstep with intransigent Israeli governments, or actually undermined good-faith efforts to move forward the Arab-Israeli peace process.

So Ben-Ami founded J Street in 2008, sensing that there exists a mass of Americans, both Jews and non-Jews, who support Israel but oppose its occupation of the West Bank, and who believe the U.S. government could and should do more to facilitate peace between Israel and its enemies.

“The majority of Israelis believe this,” Avital said, quoting a series of polls commissioned by J Street and others. “Some American Jews want to be more holy than the pope.”

Although dwarfed by AIPAC’s $70 million annual budget and massive membership role, J Street has clearly managed to stand out. Within a year, its budget has doubled, to $3 million, and its lobbying staff has doubled to six. Last June, the White House invited Ben-Ami — along with leaders of long-establish Jewish organizations, including AIPAC — for a talk with President Barack Obama. In addition, Ben-Ami — who has a reputation for being smart and strategic — has begun acquiring like-minded organizations to create a single progressive pro-Zionist voice in the United States. To that end, J Street took over the grass-roots organization Brit Tzedek v’Shalom last month. And at an L.A. breakfast just prior to our meeting, he and Avital met with 90 Angelenos from a welter of left-leaning Jewish groups. If J Street can sidestep the worst of the Jewish organization turf wars, which have given us as many defense organizations as there are Starbucks, imagine the impact.

And that impact is clearly frightening more hard-line groups. Every day my e-mail inbox fills with more dire warnings about J Street.

I have received at least a dozen forwarded e-mails of Caroline Glick’s Jerusalem Post column denouncing J Street’s “full-throated support for all of the Obama administration’s anti-Israel policies.” New e-mails arrived this week alleging Palestinian contributors to J Street; describing how J Street cooks its polls, undermines Israeli security by being “soft” on Iran and has secret sources of anti-Israel funding.

I’ve looked into all these claims, and, to be generous, all of them are at least debatable, if not just fallacious. If they sound familiar it’s because they repeat the same hackneyed memes that similar groups used to try to stop Obama: he’s anti-Israel, a foreign agent, a secret Muslim and soft on Iran.

In our discussion, however, Ben-Ami was not blind to Obama’s missteps. He made clear he thinks Obama’s Cairo speech wrongly dated the birth of Israel to the Holocaust, and that Obama placed too much emphasis on Israel’s settlement freeze without placing an equivalent demand on the Arabs. And while Obama may have thought he was speaking to Jews by visiting Buchenwald, what the president really needs to do, Ben-Ami and Avital said, is visit Israel and speak directly to Israelis.

In the meantime, Ben-Ami has deftly lined up for J Street all the elements that worked for Obama: He has compiled an e-mail list of more than 100,000 names, formed a network of young grass-roots activists and a broad, if not deep, donor group. Now the organization is launching J Street U, a series of campus-based events to give pro-Israel, left-leaning students the intellectual tools to defend Israel on campuses and move the J Street agenda forward.

There are two ways the right- and center-leaning Jewish community can approach J Street: it can attack this new initiative and try to crush it, or it can embrace it and hope it thrives. The latter choice is wiser. The most effective answer to the liberal loonies like the ones who put forth the anti-Tel Aviv petition at last week’s Toronto Film Festival is an educated, pro-Israel left. Shoving Bush-era slogans down the throats of the Obama generation is not the best way to reach them.

But the responsibility cuts both ways. For J Street to be most effective, it can’t paint AIPAC in the same cartoonish colors that the anti-Israel crowd does. The two groups could even join forces when possible. But at a time when Israel finds itself increasingly attacked and isolated by the left, Israel needs J Street.

I realize writing about lobbyists and lefties makes for a less-than-inspiring High Holy Days column — but the message beneath it all is this: We are one People with one homeland. Let 5770 be a year that brings both closer to peace.

Shanah Tovah.

Give J a Chance Read More »

The Truth About Kids And Dogs

Leashes for children.  How convenient, right?  Moms are too busy shopping at the mall or chatting on their cell phones to worry about where their child is at all times, so why not just put a leash on him?  It just makes sense, because when moms are in the middle of that important phone call about the latest nail colors, they shouldn’t be interrupted.  They can simply tug on the leash and pull their child back towards them.  Even a quick run into Coffee Bean to score that chai latte is possible.  Simply tie your child to a table outside.  (Don’t forget to leave a bowl of water if it’s hot).

Absurd, right?  Just because something is convenient, that doesn’t make it justified.  Communication?  Discipline?  Hand-holding?  Keeping an eye on your child the whole time?  Are all these things overrated?

I think we’ve crossed the line between dogs and children.  We now have dog parks where owners can unleash their dogs.  Some might argue that we have parks where children are unleashed as well, so I’ll give them that much.  Then there’s the doggy stroller dilemma.  Does one carry their teacup Chihuahua in a sequined duffel bag or push them in a doggy stroller?  And why is this always at the mall? Doesn’t putting a dog in a stroller emasculate them, for one?  Could you see a rottweiler or pit bull in a doggy stroller?  And what is the purpose anyway?  They need to nap?  They haven’t learned to walk yet?  Aren’t these the reasons strollers were invented in the first place…for babies, the human kind?  But I’m getting off topic a little here…back to leashes for kids.

I’m not a big fan of leashes, if you couldn’t tell.  And the fact that the leash, a.k.a. harness, is attached to Elmo or a teddy bear on the child’s back doesn’t make it any more acceptable.  What next, a muzzle?

I was at the mall the other day, where leashes seem to be the norm, and noticed a mom on her cell phone holding a leash attached to what appeared to be a child.  (I couldn’t really tell, because this leash extended so far out, it was hard to see whom it was attached to.)  Mom was conveniently shatting (shopping and chatting) and tugging at the leash every so often until it would hurl the toddler back to her.  Like a yo-yo.  At this point I could tell it was a child, when she was flung back to her mother.  I decided to wait for mom to finish the call and asked her why she decided to leash her child.  Her first response was, “My friends suggested it.”  Oh, O.K., so that explains a lot.  I pushed further.  “I just don’t have time to keep track of her.  And this way she won’t run away.”  So, the message she is giving her daughter is: You will not run away from me, because you can’t.  If this is her philosophy, I’d hate to see the type of leash she has on her husband.

The Truth About Kids And Dogs Read More »

Federation finds next leader in Jewish entertainment

If you look back at the stories I’ve written about Stanley Gold’s mission to reform the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, you’ll frequently see a recurring voice of support. That would be Jay Sanderson, a big-tent Jewish evangelist, who in February had this to say about the pace of progress:

“Everybody benefited from the status quo—except for the community,” said Jay Sanderson, CEO of JTN Productions and a former Federation board member. “Most Jewish organizations in this community are completely overstaffed. They are enormous for what they do. There are tired organizations that don’t have a lot of vision and are spending a tremendous amount of money doing the same old, same old.”

“I like what Stanley Gold’s intention is. It just hasn’t gone far enough in The Federation yet, and hasn’t gone far enough in the community,” Sanderson continued. “That isn’t because of Stanley. The pushback is just ridiculous. Many institutions are functioning like they did in the ’50s. There is not a lot of vision in the community, and most of these organizations spend more money on staff and raising money then they do on what their mission is.”

It should be no surprise then that, after a nationwide search to replace outgoing-President John Fishel, the search committee and Gold settled on … Jay Sanderson.

I’m not really sure why he wanted the job. He had a pretty good thing going at JTN, and an ability to get Federation and Jewish Community Foundation funding that seemed to allude so many others. But I’m not surprised the Federation wanted him over a former Los Angeles Councilman and a federation system veteran from Minneapolis: Sanderson built for his Jewish television production company a board full of Hollywood heavy hitters, and the Federation has long wanted deeper roots in Tinsel Town.

Gold, whose two-year term as board chairman ends Dec. 31, was able to recruit former Paramount chief Sherry Lansing. Now it will be Sanderson’s job to get Hollywood to give more significantly to the annual campaign and support Federation programs.

Here’s more from Jewish Journal editor-in-chief Rob Eshman:

“I’m extremely excited and feel deeply privileged,” Sanderson said in an interview Tuesday morning at the home of Stanley Gold, The Federation’s board chair. “I’m surprised. It’s such a big, important job I wasn’t sure I was going to be the person that they chose, especially given the quality of the other candidates.”

In the final week of a three-month process, the selection committee had narrowed an initial field of some 20 candidates down to four: Sanderson, former City Councilman Jack Weiss, former William Morris COO Irv Weintraub and Joshua Fogelson, executive director of the Minneapolis Jewish Federation.

Gold and Richard Sandler, The Federation’s incoming chair, informed Sanderson of the decision on Tuesday at around 9 a.m.

“All of our candidates were very, very qualified, and in that regard it’s a good decision to have to make, because we have good people,” said Sandler, an attorney who works closely with Michael Milken and the Milken Family Foundation. “Jay has the knowledge of the community, he has the skill set, and he has certainly accomplished a tremendous amount as head of JTN.”

Sanderson has been professionally active in the Jewish community for two decades, primarily in Jewish media. Since 1989, he has led JTN, during which time, among other accomplishments, he created and served as executive producer of the PBS series, “The Jewish Americans,” and the upcoming PBS documentary on modern genocide, “Worse Than War.”

(skip)

“My No. 1 goal is to really return to being central in the community, and in doing that we have to reach out to the whole community,” Sanderson said. “It has to be a convener and a collaborator. There are thousands and thousands of Jews who want to be involved in Jewish life who need to be engaged in The Federation.

“The community is so diverse, and there are so many more organizations than there have been in the past, we have to assert ourselves in terms of outreach,” he said.

Sanderson was also one of the three power players behind Newsweek’s top-rabbi list. He gets roasted after the jump:

Federation finds next leader in Jewish entertainment Read More »