fbpx

Behind the Scenes

Every Jew in Los Angeles cheered when Holocaust denier David Irving lost his libel suit against author and historian Deborah Lipstadt this year. But the actual proceedings against the former UCLA professor remained shrouded in mystery (cameras aren\'t allowed inside British courts).
[additional-authors]
October 26, 2000

Every Jew in Los Angeles cheered when Holocaust denier David Irving lost his libel suit against author and historian Deborah Lipstadt this year. But the actual proceedings against the former UCLA professor remained shrouded in mystery (cameras aren’t allowed inside British courts).

Now a “NOVA” episode, to air Oct. 31, 8 p.m. on KCET, provides a peek inside the trial. British director Leslie Woodhead used actual trial transcripts to dramatize key exchanges and to recreate them verbatim with actors. Interwoven are interviews with historians and archival footage of the Shoah.

The highlights depict how Lipstadt’s attorney, Richard Rampton, forced the denier to admit some of his theories were wrong. When Irving insists the early gassing trucks were experimental, Rampton whisks out a document proving 97,000 Jews were killed by just three vans in five weeks. “That is a very substantial achievement, if you work it out with a pocket calculator,” Irving retorts.

“Clever SS,” Rampton replies.

When the denier insists tons of corpses couldn’t have been burned at Auschwitz, given the dearth of coke supplies, Rampton produces a patent proving the crematoria ran mostly on human fat emissions.

Nevertheless, Irving quibbles at every turn: At one point, he testily complains the facts and figures may be of interest to Holocaust scholars, but not to a Hitler historian like himself. “If you appreciate the difference,” he tells Rampton.

The wig-coifed barrister coolly fires back, “I do not think there is a difference.”

“NOVA” senior producer Melanie Wallace, who helped adapt the film, originally made for Britain’s Channel Four, for PBS, concedes the subject is outside the science show’s usual realm. “But the deniers use pseudo-science to make their claims,” she says. “And we wanted to use science to debunk them.”

Lipstadt, who’s now writing a book on her experience, told a “NOVA” science writer that Irving can’t milk the trial for publicity. “No one is going to seriously review his books in the future. His reputation has been totally stripped bare. He was hoisted on his own petard,” she said.

But Irving isn’t contrite. “He says the judge didn’t get it. [That] we bought off the judge,” Lipstadt said. “Before, he engaged in Holocaust denial. Now, he also engages in verdict denial.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

Return of the Jewish Outsider

The window of political inclusion — opened slowly over decades — was never fixed in place. And if current trends continue, it may not stay open much longer. 

Bibi’s Legacy in the Balance

Netanyahu has made no secret that he wants his ultimate legacy to be the leader who finally made Israel safe. The necessary steps for that to happen all depend on a resolution to the Gaza war.

Depravity in Glastonbury

After October 7, the most ardent supporters of Hamas were found on college campuses, in the audience at concerts and performing on musical stages.

More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.