fbpx

Behind the Scenes

Every Jew in Los Angeles cheered when Holocaust denier David Irving lost his libel suit against author and historian Deborah Lipstadt this year. But the actual proceedings against the former UCLA professor remained shrouded in mystery (cameras aren\'t allowed inside British courts).
[additional-authors]
October 26, 2000

Every Jew in Los Angeles cheered when Holocaust denier David Irving lost his libel suit against author and historian Deborah Lipstadt this year. But the actual proceedings against the former UCLA professor remained shrouded in mystery (cameras aren’t allowed inside British courts).

Now a “NOVA” episode, to air Oct. 31, 8 p.m. on KCET, provides a peek inside the trial. British director Leslie Woodhead used actual trial transcripts to dramatize key exchanges and to recreate them verbatim with actors. Interwoven are interviews with historians and archival footage of the Shoah.

The highlights depict how Lipstadt’s attorney, Richard Rampton, forced the denier to admit some of his theories were wrong. When Irving insists the early gassing trucks were experimental, Rampton whisks out a document proving 97,000 Jews were killed by just three vans in five weeks. “That is a very substantial achievement, if you work it out with a pocket calculator,” Irving retorts.

“Clever SS,” Rampton replies.

When the denier insists tons of corpses couldn’t have been burned at Auschwitz, given the dearth of coke supplies, Rampton produces a patent proving the crematoria ran mostly on human fat emissions.

Nevertheless, Irving quibbles at every turn: At one point, he testily complains the facts and figures may be of interest to Holocaust scholars, but not to a Hitler historian like himself. “If you appreciate the difference,” he tells Rampton.

The wig-coifed barrister coolly fires back, “I do not think there is a difference.”

“NOVA” senior producer Melanie Wallace, who helped adapt the film, originally made for Britain’s Channel Four, for PBS, concedes the subject is outside the science show’s usual realm. “But the deniers use pseudo-science to make their claims,” she says. “And we wanted to use science to debunk them.”

Lipstadt, who’s now writing a book on her experience, told a “NOVA” science writer that Irving can’t milk the trial for publicity. “No one is going to seriously review his books in the future. His reputation has been totally stripped bare. He was hoisted on his own petard,” she said.

But Irving isn’t contrite. “He says the judge didn’t get it. [That] we bought off the judge,” Lipstadt said. “Before, he engaged in Holocaust denial. Now, he also engages in verdict denial.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

A Bisl Yom Kippur~ Plenty of Regrets

Yom Kippur is admitting our plentiful regrets and summoning and building our inner determination and drive to be better people, regrets, and all.

Expanding the Soul

There is a struggle within us between constriction and expansion, between despair and vitality. Good humor can be a powerful ally against the constriction that suffering creates.

Making Torah More Accessible

The 402-page book is organized around 36 life lessons related to the Book of Genesis, with thoughtful study questions and dozens of responses from respected sources in Jewish thought.

Avi Nesher Fights the Boycott with a Human Story

Making Israeli films is not easy. Budgets are generally small by American standards, and international financing has become increasingly difficult to secure amid the cultural boycott of Israeli cinema.

Knowing Our History

In this time of introspection and rising adversity, let us resolve as American Jews to write our new chapter by better understanding our history.

My Choice for Essay of the Year

The collective assault against Israel has been so broad and deep it’s been hard finding anyone in the mainstream media who will dare go after the Hamas murderers whose biggest victims are the Palestinians.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.