fbpx

NBC News Retracts Story Questioning Biden Appointee’s AIPAC Donations

[additional-authors]
January 28, 2021
Anne Neuberger and Garrett Graff speak onstage at the WIRED25 Summit 2019 – Day 1 at Commonwealth Club on November 08, 2019 in San Francisco, California. (Photo by Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for WIRED)

On the evening of January 27, NBC News retracted a story that questioned a Biden administration appointee’s donations to AIPAC.

The story, which was first reported by Mother Jones, centers on Anne Neuberger, who President Biden appointed to the Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology position earlier in the month. Neuberger’s family foundation — the Anne and Yehuda Neuberger Foundation — donated $559,000 to AIPAC from 2012–18. The report quotes several anonymous officials and experts, as well as a Washington University law professor, arguing that the donations raise questions about Neuberger’s “impartiality” when it comes to matters involving Israel.

NBC News ran a similar story, featuring a quote from the National Security Council stating that “Neuberger will abide by the Executive Order on Ethics Commitments By Executive Branch Personnel.”

Jewish groups denounced the story.

“This article and its baseless claims against Anne Neuberger are incendiary,” Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt tweeted. “They have no bearing on her field of expertise or her new responsibilities. The donations of her family foundation to AIPAC don’t preclude her from public service.”

He alleged in a subsequent tweet that the story promulgated the dual loyalty “that Jewish-Americans are more faithful to a foreign power. It’s a tired antisemitic trope that should have been retired long ago, not recycled on a day when we mourn [6 million Jews].”

The American Jewish Committee (AJC) similarly tweeted, “.@AIPAC is an American organization that supports an alliance critical to American [national] security—as do a majority of Americans. Questioning the loyalty of a public servant for supporting it is not just offensive, it reeks of bigotry. @MotherJones owes Anne Neuberger an apology.”

 

The Conference of Presidents also tweeted, “We call on @MotherJones to withdraw its attack on Deputy National Security Adviser Anne Neuberger for her family’s support for @AIPAC. She has served the American people with distinction. This attack on her character smacks of age-old antisemitic canards.”

 

AIPAC itself called out NBC News, tweeting that the news outlet should “retract this offensive story. Charges of dual loyalty are anti-Semitic and insult millions of Americans—Jewish & non-Jewish—who stand by our ally Israel. We will not be deterred from exercising our rights as citizens to advocate for a strong US-Israel relationship.”

 

Emily Horne, a spokesperson for the White House National Security Council (NSC), also tweeted that they “are appalled by recent spurious accusations against our staff. We welcome oversight and scrutiny, but there is no justification for false and ad hominem attacks based on ethnic, racial, or religious identity.”

She added: “The women and men of the NSC are patriotic, dedicated, and serve their country with distinction. Being forced to endure public smear campaigns should not be part of working on behalf of the American people.”

In an editor’s note on the article, NBC wrote that after various readers raised concerns about it, they decided to retract it because “it fell short of our reporting standards. In order to warrant publication, it needed on-the-record quotes from critics, rather than anonymous ones. The article should have also included more views from those who believe that donations to AIPAC do not represent a conflict.” NBC has kept the story in their archives for the sake of transparency.

Mother Jones, on the other hand, is continuing to stand by their reporting. An editor’s note at the bottom of the story states that they gave Neuberger two days to respond and that their story “cited both named and unnamed sources.”

David Corn, the author of the Mother Jones story, denied that the piece invokes the dual loyalty trope, tweeting in response to the AJC that his article and the NBC News article simply “reported that national security and government ethics experts consider these donations problematic.”

In other tweets, Corn cited a passage from former President Barack Obama’s 2020 book “A Promised Land” stating that “AIPAC is aligned with the Israeli right and on policy disputes has sided with Israel when it ‘took actions that were contrary to US policy.’” Another tweet of his stated, “We’re not judging her based on the AIPAC contributions. The piece notes she is highly regarded. But it also quotes top intel officials saying it’s problematic for a sr. intel official to give big $$$ to a lobby closely ties to a for. govt.”

 

Noah Pollak, who heads the foreign policy advocacy organization Democratic Alliance Initiative, countered: “You or I can find ‘experts’ to say anything we want, so pegging a piece like this to some mythical consensus of ‘experts’ is both stupid and dishonest. As is your overall lame attempt to link donating money to AIPAC to cyberespionage on the US.”

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

A Night of Gratitude Honoring Dennis Prager

Latest Articles

Rosner’s Domain: Weeks of Known Unknowns

So here we are, stuck with just a few bad options to consider. And that’s just the political superposition of undetermined future – alongside it there’s also the possible – probable? – war with Iran.

After the Last Out, Collect a Different Kind of Card

At a time when Jewish education is competing for attention in a world dominated by screens, sports, short-form videos and endless streams of content, these easily collectable cards offer a different kind of engagement.

6 Jewish Takeaways from the Midterm Elections

There is little chance that the combination of a weakened Trump and an emboldened Democratic Congress produces similar levels of support for aggressive action against Iran and its proxies, and other policies that a wide spectrum of Israelis see as crucial to their security.

Israel Drives Them Crazy

In the diaspora and in Israel, we cannot turn back the clock and undo the harm that was done to us. But we can shape our own future. Israel is strong and resolute. So must we be.

Torah Portion: Chayei Sarah

The Torah offers a comforting view of a life beyond this life. We aren’t told what it will be exactly — yes, it’s abstract and vague — but we are told it’s waiting for us as it was for Abraham.

Hatred Opened the Door. A Missed Victory Held It Open.

For me, the disaster isn’t that Democrats won or Republicans lost. It’s that politicians who demonize Israel, deny Jewish self-determination and explain away antisemitism are finding an increasingly receptive electorate in the world’s most important democracy.

The Jewish Dilemma

The central issue is not whether Jewish voters should support Democrats or Republicans. It is whether either party can demonstrate that Jewish security, Jewish identity and Jewish self-determination are compatible with its broader political agenda.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.