fbpx

SEC sues Stanley Chais and four others

[additional-authors]
June 22, 2009

Stanley Chais, the 83-year-old Beverly Hills investor manager, keeps getting bad news. Last month he was sued by the court-appointed trustee liquidating Bernard Madoff’s bogus investment company; the trustee, Irving Picard, claimed Chais “knew or should have known that they were reaping the benefits of manipulated purported returns, false documents and fictitious profits.”

Today the Securities and Exchange Commission followed suit with a its own civil lawsuit (PDF) claiming Chais and four others willfully participated in the biggest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history:

In a complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, the Securities and Exchange Commission claimed that Cohmad Securities Corporation; its chairman, Maurice J. Cohn; his daughter and the firm’s chief operating officer, Marcia Beth Cohn; and a broker at the firm, Robert M. Jaffe; actively marketing Madoff investments while “knowingly or recklessly disregarding facts indicating that Madoff was operating a fraud.”

In a separate civil complaint in the same court, the regulators filed similar charges against Mr. Chais, an investment adviser and prominent philanthropist who oversaw three funds that invested all of their assets with Mr. Madoff. When the Ponzi scheme collapsed, the Chais investors’ accounts were valued at nearly $1 billion.

The S.E.C. complaint against Mr. Chais echoed a complaint filed by Irving H. Picard, the trustee pursuing assets for Mr. Madoff’s victims. Within moments of the announcement of the regulatory cases, Mr. Picard also sued Cohmad, mirroring claims made in Monday’s S.E.C. complaint.

Read the rest here.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

A Night of Gratitude Honoring Dennis Prager

Latest Articles

Torah Portion: Chayei Sarah

The Torah offers a comforting view of a life beyond this life. We aren’t told what it will be exactly — yes, it’s abstract and vague — but we are told it’s waiting for us as it was for Abraham.

Hatred Opened the Door. A Missed Victory Held It Open.

For me, the disaster isn’t that Democrats won or Republicans lost. It’s that politicians who demonize Israel, deny Jewish self-determination and explain away antisemitism are finding an increasingly receptive electorate in the world’s most important democracy.

The Jewish Dilemma

The central issue is not whether Jewish voters should support Democrats or Republicans. It is whether either party can demonstrate that Jewish security, Jewish identity and Jewish self-determination are compatible with its broader political agenda.

An Abdul El-Sayed Victory Would Be a Defeat for Democrats

An El-Sayed victory would send a dangerous message to Democrats across the country that inflammatory rhetoric, tolerance of antisemitism and alliances with extremists are not political liabilities but a viable path to national office.

Anatomy of an Apartheid State

Can Israel afford to have a Muslim politician who is agnostic about terror serve in the cabinet and attend security briefings?

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.