fbpx

Pro-Israel Group Receives Apology from IRS for Unfair Scrutiny

[additional-authors]
February 1, 2018
Photo from Flickr/Cliff

A pro-Israel organization received a formal apology from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on Feb. 1 for facing unfair scrutiny from the agency.

The Department of Justice announced that a settlement has been reached between the organization, Z Street, and the IRS after Z street filed a lawsuit against the agency in 2010 for viewpoint discrimination. Z Street claimed that the IRS was slow-walking the organization’s application for tax exempt status simply because Z Street is a pro-Israel advocacy group that was publicly at odds with the Obama administration’s treatment of Israel.

The apology from the IRS is part of the settlement.

“It is improper for the IRS to single out groups for different treatment based on their names or ideological positions,” said Attorney General Jeff Sessions. “Any entitlement to tax exemption should be based on the activities of the organization and whether they fulfill requirements of the law, not the policy positions adopted by members or the name chosen to reflect those views.”

“There is no excuse for this conduct. Hundreds of organizations were affected by these actions, and they deserve an apology from the IRS. We hope that today’s settlement makes clear that this abuse of power will not be tolerated.”

Z Street was designated by the agency as part of the “Occupied Territory Advocacy” subset of the IRS’s “progressive” category; any groups under that subset would be flagged by the agency as needing higher scrutiny.

The IRS claimed they scrutinized Z Street under the auspices “that Z Street might be engaged in the funding of terrorism because ‘there is a higher risk of terrorism in Israel,’” according to Hot Air.

However, as Hot Air points out, none of the publicly available IRS documents on Z Street mentioned anything about terrorism and Z Street was the only organization to be put in that “Occupied Territory Advocacy” subset.

Additionally, the IRS tried to argue in court viewpoint discrimination lawsuits didn’t apply to them, a claim thrown out by the judge.

According to the DOJ, Z Street’s settlement will be among the last between the IRS and organizations that allege the agency subjected them to higher scrutiny over their tax-exempt status applications due to their political viewpoint. Lois Lerner, the former director of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Unit, admitted that the IRS unfairly targeted conservative organizations. However, Lerner never took responsibility for those actions repeatedly plead the Fifth when Congress grilled her on the matter.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

Stuffed with Spice and Simcha

The custom of eating stuffed vegetables on Simchat Torah is to symbolize the scrolls of the Torah filled with the wisdom of the holy text.

Crisis of Truth

An uproar over an article showing discrimination against Jewish and Israeli writers dramatizes how ideology and politics prevail over truth.

Two Elections, One People

On October 27, Israelis will elect the 26th Knesset. A week later, on November 3, Americans will vote in pivotal midterm elections.

The Return to Biblicalness

Shattering as it’s been, there’s something to be said for this abrupt return to biblicalness. By this awkward word I don’t mean belief in religion, necessarily, but appreciation for values that have fallen into disfavor in our supposedly enlightened age.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.