fbpx

March 2, 2025

Jewish Hollywood’s Jewish Problem

The 97th annual Academy Awards took place on Sunday night. A bit of mystery was added to all the pageantry. Long before statues were handed out, the anticipation was eclipsed by the glamorous parade of designer finery—not the tuxes, dresses and gowns, but one added accessory: a Red Hand pin worn specially for the red carpet.

With an auditorium filled with so many wardrobe aficionados, a discretely worn, harmless-looking pin made both a political and fashion statement at the same time.

What political statement, specifically? For both Palestinians and Israelis, the pin represents the bloody hands of a terrorist who in 2000, in the West Bank, carved up two IDF soldiers and then gleefully displayed his handiwork from an open window to a cheering horde. Eventually imprisoned, but not before explaining: “We were in a craze to see blood. . .. I saw that my hands were drenched with blood, . . . so I went over to the window, and I waved my hands at the people . . ..”

Eleven years later, he, along with October 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar, was set free in a hostage-prisoner exchange.

Gracing the red carpet while wearing a Red Hand pin is a celebration of savagery. Noble intentions could never be demonstrated with such a ghoulish symbol. The people who actually live and die in the region know better—even if you don’t.

Guy Pearce somehow got the message. Nominated for Best Supporting Actor, he wore a white dove-shaped pin embossed with, “Free Palestine.” He had his facts wrong (Gaza was free), but at least he wasn’t rejoicing in Jewish blood.

Who would wish to wear such a red badge of dishonor on Tinseltown’s biggest night, anyway?

On the same day that three of the four members of the Bibas family were laid to rest in Israel, a group calling itself Artists4Ceasefire entreated Hollywood’s elite to wear Red Hand pins at the Academy Awards.

Artists4Ceasefire? Currently there is a ceasefire; and there was a ceasefire on October 6, 2023. Minor details, along with the terrorist strike on October 7, itself.

Artists4Ceasefire purports to have 550 members. Some, sporting their Red Hand pins, came dressed to kill at last year’s Academy Awards: Billie Eilish, Finneas O’Connell, Ramy Youssef, Ava DuVernay, Nicola Coughlan, Ayo Edebiri and Mark Ruffalo. As many as 400 signed a letter to President Biden, ostensibly to express their human rights bona fides, but ultimately throwing their support behind Hamas and against the notion that Jewish lives should matter.

Some of those signers included Jennifer Lopez, Richard Gere, Susan Sarandon, Gigi and Bella Hadid, Bradley Cooper, Pedro Pascal, Angelina Jolie, Leana Headey, John Cusack, Viggo Mortenson, Kirsten Dunst, Kristen Stewart, Selena Gomez, Dua Lipa, Alfonso Cuaron, Cate Blanchett, Channing Tatum, Oscar Isaac, Brian Cox, Ben Affleck and Rachel McAdams.

Several Jews could not resist adding their names: Drake, Jon Stewart, Joaquim Phoenix, Ilana Glazer, Mandy Patinkin and Andrew Garfield.

A smaller group of signatories called for an arms embargo against Israel. They included Ariana Grande, Mahershala Ali, Cynthia Nixon, Stewart, Glazer and, of course, Ruffalo.

Ruffalo is the reigning Hollywood antisemite-in-chief. (Cusack and Mortensen kick themselves every day for losing the title. Expect both to mount a coup to regain the crown.)

The good news is that a pro-Jewish Hollywood activist group has materialized. Niftily named “the Brigade,” it consists of 700 filmmakers, producers, agents, managers, publicists, executives, actors and actresses. The group responded to Artists4Ceasefire’s call to wear Red Hand pins at the Oscars with a statement that read, “That pin is no symbol of peace. It is the emblem of Jewish bloodshed.”

Why should such an obvious statement ever need to be made—in Los Angeles, of all places? It is, after all, a company town conceived by Jewish immigrants who entered the silent film business early and soon outgrew the sound stages of Astoria, Queens. They hightailed it for Hollywood with the promise of cheap land—and to avoid lawsuits from Thomas Edison, who invented the first movie camera. The mountains and deserts of Los Angeles became the backlot for a burgeoning American cultural export—a shtetl for cinephiles.

Nearly all of the original studio chiefs in Hollywood were Jews. Many had changed their names to hide their Jewishness. What’s more, they specialized in the Saturday matinee fare of cowboy westerns, even though none of them knew how to ride a horse.

They wanted the film industry to replicate the model of melting-pot assimilation—the world they came from and excelled at.

But it came with the price of whitewashing their own identities. When the Academy Museum of Motion Pictures opened in 2021, with a mandate of maximum inclusivity, the original founders of the film industry, inexplicably, found themselves left out of the permanent installation.

Jewish Hollywood always had a Jewish problem—the secret handshake of not calling attention to itself. Self-reference was believed to be bad for business. In the 1930s, Germany was Hollywood’s second largest market. For that reason alone, movies that might offend Adolf Hitler were simply not made.

Jewish Hollywood always had a Jewish problem—the secret handshake of not calling attention to itself. Self-reference was believed to be bad for business. In the 1930s, Germany was Hollywood’s second largest market. For that reason alone, movies that might offend Adolf Hitler were simply not made.

Charlie Chaplin, a philosemite of the first order, stood alone in taking on the great dictator with his first talkie, “The Great Dictator” (1940). All those powerful Jewish men were outshone by the Little Tramp.

The Academy Awards have been politicized against Israel before. Back in 1978, Vanessa Redgrave received the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress and promptly excoriated Israel as “Zionist hoodlums.” Many shouted her down.

At last year’s ceremony, Jonathan Glazer accepted the Oscar for “The Zone of Interest” by refuting his Jewishness and denouncing Israel for exploiting the Holocaust to mistreat Palestinians. This time, many in the audience applauded.

Which raises the question: Who, exactly, is among this Brigade willing to buck the politically correct Santa Ana winds and defy the sartorial Red Hand pins of antisemites? Are any of them superstar celebrities? The bold-face names that comprise Artists4Ceasefire are well known. But are Steven Spielberg and Barbra Streisand among the Brigade?

I seriously doubt it.

When Adrien Brody, who is Jewish, accepted his Oscar and Golden Globe for Best Actor for “The Brutalist,” in which he portrayed a Holocaust survivor, he somehow managed to avoid mentioning the Holocaust, or that his character was even Jewish. (At the Oscars, in an incoherently self-indulgent speech, he blurted out antisemitism and racism as a generalized afterthought.)

For an industry still powered by Jews and obsessed with the making of superhero movies, the Oscar for Jewish Cowardice continues to have far too many nominees.


Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro University, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is the legal analyst for CBS News Radio. His most recent book is titled “Saving Free Speech … From Itself,” and his forthcoming book is titled, “Beyond Proportionality: Israel’s Just War in Gaza.

Jewish Hollywood’s Jewish Problem Read More »

Why Am I Thinking of Harvey Weinstein Tonight?

We have a tendency to notice only what’s in front of us. But as I was seeing images of celebrities on the red carpet entering the Academy Awards tonight, it was something I did not see that struck me.

I didn’t see the glowing figure of Harvey Weinstein, the former Hollywood maestro who’s now in a New York jail serving a long sentence for sexual crimes.

Is he watching tonight from the jail TV, I wondered? What must be going through his mind?

There was a time when Oscar night was like Weinstein’s private party. I read somewhere that his films won over 80 Oscars. Everyone knew Harvey was obsessed with that statue. Even in years he didn’t win, it was always his night.

It’s no longer his night. On the red carpet and on the airwaves, he’s nowhere to be seen. No one thinks of him. Of course, given his crimes, no one is missing his presence.

But I think of other people we can’t see who’ve had a huge impact on our lives. It’s not easy to think of them because their images don’t show up on our social media feeds, or on any of the digital screens that own our eyes. Unless we look for them, they’re invisible. It could be a friend or family member who’s no longer with us or lives far away, or even a pundit whose columns we no longer see.

I don’t see Christopher Hitchens’ name anymore on my news feed, but I often wonder what he would say about today’s political madness.

We tend to see only what’s in front of us, but it’s the images we don’t see and the people we don’t think about that can really haunt us and give us pause.

Even the image of a disgraced Hollywood big shot who’s now watching his Big Night alone from a place far away.

Why Am I Thinking of Harvey Weinstein Tonight? Read More »

Jews Must Invest in Jew-Lovers, Not Jew-Haters

Jew-haters are inversely connected to Jew-lovers. The haters hate us no matter what we do. They hate us, in other words, just because we’re Jews.

Jew-lovers also love us because we’re Jews, but in their case, it’s because of what we do. Their view of Jews has been shaped by the good deeds of Jews.

How do we make sense of these opposite impulses?

Let’s start with the haters. The ancient notion that Jew-haters will always find a convenient excuse to hate Jews is nothing new. For millennia, we’ve been humanity’s favorite, most malleable scapegoat.

As my friend Yossi Klein Halevi has written, “What antisemitism does is turn the Jews into the symbol of whatever it is that a given civilization defines as its most loathsome qualities. And so, under Christianity — before the Holocaust and Vatican II — the Jew was the Christ-killer. Under Communism, the Jew was the capitalist. Under Nazism, the Jew was the race polluter.

“Now we live in a different civilization, where the most loathsome qualities are racism, colonialism, apartheid. And lo and behold, the greatest offender in the world today… is the Jewish state.”

These truths are hard to swallow. It’s painful to hear that Jewish actions make no difference to those determined to hate Jews — that all they need to know to hate us is simply that we’re Jews.

And yet, for some reason, as a community we still focus so much of our resources on these unconditional Jew-haters. We assume that since hate is the “problem,” that is what we must “fix.” But unconditional Jew-hatred is not a problem — it’s a condition. We can throw $500 million to fix the problem, but as we keep seeing to our dismay, the condition only gets worse.

Why does it get worse? Because we’re investing in a poisonous and fruitless market. We assume that we must mobilize to fight the poison of hate, but all too often that only encourages the poison to spread. We assume that to win a war, we must turn into tough warriors.

But even warriors know when it’s time to pivot. Warriors would not ignore, for instance, the reality that our expensive war on antisemitism has consistently failed to make a dent.

They might even conclude that it’s time to pivot to something bigger and more inspiring, something like pro-Semitism.

Just as the war against antisemitism suggests falsely that “the world hates Jews,” elevating pro-Semitism suggests the very opposite. It reminds people that there are a lot more Jew-lovers than Jew-haters, and for good reason. Despite all the bad news we hear about Jews, Pew research still shows that more Americans hold favorable views of Jews than of any other religious group.

This doesn’t mean we should ignore the fight against hate; it means we shouldn’t let it define us. It means we should play to our strength—our actions. It means we should proudly build on the long Jewish tradition of contributing to America and the American dream.

I was at a private dinner the other night sitting across from two Jewish cultural giants. The conversation (of course) revolved around antisemitism. Impulsively, I interrupted. I talked about being raised in a Muslim country (Morocco) where Jews were just grateful to stay out of trouble and practice their tradition.

Now I live in a country where Jews are heroes. In every possible field—from comedy to science to academia to literature to entertainment to social justice to medicine to art to pretty much everything—Jews have contributed more than their share. And the two heroes who sat across from me were the living embodiment of that tradition.

“We are the LAST group anyone should hate,” I said, almost naively. “I never want to lose that innocent thought.”

And yet, it often seems as if Jew-haters have eroded that innocence and forced us to fight on their terms.

If I had a magic wand for our community, I would allocate our resources in two areas: one group focused on legal and physical protection of Jews, and other groups focused on building pro-Semitism. The first group would work with law enforcement to protect Jews and use the legal system to go after hate crimes.  The other groups would make more noise by instilling pro-Semitism among Jews and non-Jews with an uplifting agenda that benefits all of America.

We don’t need to show off; we just need to show and do. Show Jews in action doing new and great things. Teach courses and make films about the Jewish contributions to America. Instead of another Holocaust museum, open a museum of Jewish comedy. Share Jewish wisdom with the masses. Become champions not just of Israel but of America.

In short, we have an opportunity to launch a new golden age where Jews become known again for creating and contributing rather than just fighting hate. Building love and being creative is more compelling than fighting hate. It’s who we are. It’s our natural position. And we have more than enough innovation and resources with our community and our allies to make this a winning direction.

Those who hate Jews for no reason are a bad investment. Those who love Jews for the right reasons is where our future is. That is where we should open our hearts and invest our energies, both for us and for America.

Jews Must Invest in Jew-Lovers, Not Jew-Haters Read More »