fbpx

November 8, 2021

It’s Time for Jewish Democrats to Ditch the Hard Left

The recent gubernatorial election in Virginia, with its upset win by a Republican upstart against a pillar of the Democratic establishment, is being discussed as a harbinger of election cycles to come. 

Don’t bet on it.

Yes, Virginians sent a message to the Democratic Party: Obsequious groveling to please progressives comes with a huge cost. Continue to empower them, let them set your agenda and fashion your policies, and you will lose more elections. And there’s a message for Jewish voters, too: It’s time to vote your own parochial interests, ditch the hard left and insist that elected officials speak as Jews and for Jews. 

Democrats could start by taking back their party from the Squad. The four female Representatives didn’t adopt a military name for nothing. The intention was always to start wars, take hostages, and Occupy Wall Street—not the progressive movement, but an actual occupation. And they have been banking on the obtuse acquiescence of party leaders all along. 

What we learned in Virginia, and in other local races where seats were flipped or where blue-state Democrats barely escaped losses, is that the culture war, social policies, spending habits, invisible borders and, perhaps most of all, America-bashing educational curriculum of progressives is completely incompatible with how most Americans feel about their country.

What we learned in Virginia, and in other local races where seats were flipped or where blue-state Democrats barely escaped losses, is that the culture war, social policies, spending habits, invisible borders and, perhaps most of all, America-bashing educational curriculum of progressives is completely incompatible with how most Americans feel about their country.

And isn’t that the point: Democratic Socialists are wielding disproportionate power in Joe Biden’s presidency? Candidate Biden presented himself as a sure-handed moderate and national unifier. Yet, from the very first days of his administration, he signaled a leftward lurch from the center. “Green New Deal,” “Build Back Better,” “Systemic Racism,” “White Supremacy”—all penetrated the national discourse, and none relied on the vocabulary of a political moderate. 

Progressives were rewarded for helping secure Biden’s victory. Black Lives Matter blanketed the Democratic Party. And the president, perhaps owing to his advanced age, demonstrated that he possessed neither the muscle nor mettle to hold progressives back. Some predicted such a turn of events, but the desire to see Donald Trump leave the White House overcame any fear of what may have been waiting in the wings of the West Wing.    

Imagine if Rev. Jesse Jackson had hijacked the Democratic Party of Bill Clinton, possessing outsized influence in setting the economic and cultural agenda of the United States during the Clinton presidency.

That’s what’s happening now. This recent election is either a serious backlash or a mere blip—an aberration owing to the eruption at the Loudoun County School Board meeting. Suddenly, across the country, parents began to question the racial determinism of what their children are being taught in school—a curriculum predicated on deprogramming children of a race-neutral, equal opportunity, merit-based, liberal-minded view of America. 

Have we had enough of the nonsense? Do we not realize that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is seated in Congress only because she resides in a diversity-rich district of millennials, Twitter-users, woke-warriors, climate-worriers, statue-topplers and law and order skeptics? A perfect electoral storm brought her to Washington, but it was in no way a bellwether of larger American attitudes. 

Immediately after the election, Democratic leaders reassured the party that the economic overhaul will continue. And it would coincide with the larger culture war played out in our politics and schools. Democrats believe they are better educated than Republicans. Perhaps. But it doesn’t make them smarter. Among Democrats, there is a long history of slavish loyalties, tired tropes and repetitions made out of habit.

For instance, Jews are known for their commitment to education. And yet the leaders of the grass roots movement to undo the teachings of Critical Race Theory do not appear to be especially represented by Jews. Is that because they all agree that America is a racist nation?

Exit polls in Virginia indicate only a modest increase in Jewish voters abandoning the Democratic Party. Since the days of FDR, the Party can always depend on, if not altogether take for granted, Jewish support. Not rising inflation, supply chain failures, southern border laxity, a forsaken Afghanistan, rising anti-Jewish bigotry, or the impending revival of the Iran Deal, will apparently change the composition of the Jewish vote.

If Democrats aren’t selling it, then a majority of Jewish Americans aren’t buying it. After all, it’s not like Republicans—even Jewish ones—aren’t trying to make a sale.

Perhaps all the talk about white privilege has convinced Jews that they are not entitled to ask for anything. They must step aside in shame. Check their privilege and keep their mouths shut. No longer are they a distinct group of Americans with concerns vital and unique to their community. The “inclusiveness” of this moment, tellingly, does not include Jews. 

And matters are made worse when Jewish elected officials are too timid to sound the alarm on behalf of their people. Jews beaten on the streets of New York, Los Angeles and Miami after Israel’s last Gaza war. Jewish students intimidated and silenced on college campuses. The ceaseless blood libeling of Israel. Calls to defund America’s support for the Iron Dome. BDS talk that escalated from whispers to a Ben & Jerry’s ice cream boycott in the West Bank.

Why isn’t there a Jewish Squad—a group of governmental leaders unafraid to stand in solidarity with their tribe, unified against antisemitism in its various modern guises.

Where’s the Jewish leadership on these issues? Why isn’t there a Jewish Squad—a group of governmental leaders unafraid to stand in solidarity with their tribe, unified against antisemitism in its various modern guises.

Jewish officials never fail to join a Black Lives Matter protest. But would they cross the street to embrace a beleaguered, bullied Jew?

What to call a Jewish counterpart to the Squad? The Chosen Squadron. Bagel Brigade. G.I. Jews. It only matters that some auxiliary force exists, comprised of Jewish leaders willing to openly defend Jews. The grim obstacle to any such enlistment, however, is that antisemitism is not, for the time being, a progressive priority. Until that changes, they will want little part in protecting Jews.

Recently, five members of Congress called upon cable television providers to offer more Jewish-themed programming. The idea is to expose Americans to a distinct minority that is not merely “white-adjacent.” The prejudice against Jews happens to predate all other bigotries. Even today, despite all their success and presumed privileges, they are the targets of more hate crimes, by wide margins, than any other group.

And the five legislators behind this initiative to combat antisemitism? Only two are Jewish. And none of them have the last names: Schumer, Nadler, Feinstein, Schiff, Raskin, Cardin, Ossoff, Rosen, Blumenthal and Sanders.


Thane Rosenbaum is a novelist, essayist, law professor and Distinguished University Professor at Touro College, where he directs the Forum on Life, Culture & Society. He is the legal analyst for CBS News Radio. His most recent book is titled “Saving Free Speech … From Itself.”

It’s Time for Jewish Democrats to Ditch the Hard Left Read More »

What to Do With a Child Like Esav

Esav is a problem child from the very beginning. The Bible carefully catalogues the failings of his early years. He is a hunter, a violent job that contrasts sharply with a family preference for shepherding, and in an act of extreme impulsiveness, he sells the sacred privilege of the first born for a bowl of lentils. His choice of wives are inappropriate, marrying coarse women from the local Canaanites, and in his fury, he vows to murder his brother.

It is clear that Esav was fated to be a failure. The Midrash says that even in utero, Esav would jump every time his mother passed a pagan temple, as if he was ready to go in and worship. Esav is born with a ruddy complexion, and his body is covered in a coat of hair. Rashi says the redness indicates a propensity for murder. The commentary of Rabbi Moise Tedeschi, the Hoil Moshe, speculates that the word Esav means prehistoric man, which indicates that those around baby Esav thought his hairy, red appearance made him look like a small caveman. Other negative comments in the Midrash interpret Esav’s name as a reference to animal food (esev) and futility (shav). Esav is flawed from birth.

This description of Esav is extremely problematic. How can a person be born bad? Free will is a fundamental Jewish belief; Maimonides calls it “the very pillar of the Torah and the commandments”. In his Letter on Astrology, Maimonides argues that if man had no free will, the commandments would be pointless; people would end up doing whatever they were predestined to do anyway, with or without commands. Free will seems to be a given in Judaism, and like Maimonides, many Jewish thinkers are free will absolutists, believing that everything is a matter of choice.

From this vantage point, every child has exceptional opportunity; as Maimonides puts it, “every man is capable of being as righteous as Moshe our teacher or as wicked as Yeravam”. Remarkable turnarounds are always possible. Rabbi Naftali Tzvi Berlin, the Netziv, would tell a story about himself that emphasizes how easily potential can be overlooked. He said that when he was a child in school, he was lazy and didn’t pay attention. When he was eleven, he overheard his father saying to his mother that he’d spoken to young Naftali Tzvi’s Rebbe, and together they concluded he would never become a Torah scholar; because of this, his father arranged for him to apprentice with the local shoemaker after his Bar Mitzvah. Young Naftali Tzvi ran to his father and begged for another chance; and overnight, he became an excellent student.  

There are many people with inborn shortcomings; how do we help them find the right point where they can grow and flourish? How do we find a meaningful place for them in our schools and communities?

As a young child, the Netziv turned his life around. When we read our parsha, we must consider the very same question about Esav: could he have transformed himself? Is changing behavior just about cracking down, and strengthening one’s will? Free will is not quite that simple. Many Jewish thinkers take a different view than Maimonides; some, like Rav Zadok Hakohen of Lublin, fully accept determinism, the view that there is no free will. Rav Zadok is concerned that freewill contradicts God’s omnipotence; and while he is an outlier in Jewish thought, his deterministic point of view would not be out of place in contemporary philosophy. Advances in neuroscience and genetics have led many to argue that the brain, and the choices it makes, are subject to the laws of nature, instead of the person’s own will. And undoubtedly there is so much of life that isn’t under our control; the Mishnah reminds us that “against your will were you born.. and against your will you will die”. We know that much of what occurs in our lives is predetermined.

Many Jewish texts grapple with the fine line between free will and determinism. The Talmud tells about an inventive response to determinism from the mother of a prominent Rabbi. It says that “an astrologer told Rav Naḥman bar Yitzhak’s mother: Your son will be a thief. (In response), she never allowed him to uncover his head. She said to her son: “Cover your head so that the fear of Heaven will be upon you, and pray for Divine mercy”. He did not know why she said this to him. One day he was sitting and studying beneath a palm tree that did not belong to him, and the cloak fell off of his head. He lifted his eyes and saw the palm tree. He was so overcome by impulse that he climbed up and detached a bunch of dates with his teeth.” This passage, which serves as one of the halakhic sources for wearing a kippah, is a powerful response to the questions of determinism. Perhaps Rav Nachman’s future was foretold; but his mother found a way to outwit his fate. Your will may be too weak to overcome your horoscope; but then again there are always creativite responses to evade a direct collision with fate.

Even with creativity and determination, there remain times when we are simply unable to change, when free will falls short. Rav Eliyahu Dessler explains that free will is not universal. Some of our good habits are so deeply ingrained, that we cannot imagine acting otherwise; and there are bad habits that we don’t even perceive as bad, that we are unable to change. But on the battlefield between what in our lives is predetermined for good and for bad sits one point where the battle takes place; this spot is the “point of free will”. It is at that spot where the battle for change occurs.

Rav Dessler’s idea of “the point of free will” is profound and nuanced. It affirms the centrality of free will, and the importance of personal initiative and responsibility; yet it also offers greater understanding of those who are morally unlucky, whose bad behavior may be a product of their genetics and upbringing.

This idea is particularly significant in the realm of education. A particular student’s temperament is critical to how they are educated; the challenge is to find that point where the student can choose to learn and grow. To treat the classroom as an assembly line is a mistake, and will only frustrate the students whose capabilities differ from others. 

Esav may have been a victim of this misunderstanding. Perhaps his parents misjudged his temperament, and assumed that he could readily overcome inborn defects and deficits. Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch writes in an essay that “had Isaac and Rebecca studied Esav’s nature and character early enough, and asked themselves, how can even an Esav, how can all the strength and energy, agility and courage that lies slumbering in this child be won over to be used in the service of God … then Jacob and Esav, with their totally different natures could still have remained twin­ brothers in spirit and life; quite early in life Esav’s “sword” and Jacob’s “spirit” could have worked hand in hand…”

Rabbi Hirsch is arguing for us to understand Esav, to educate him for who he is. We certainly  need to be concerned that maybe he consigns Esav to vocational school too quickly; and of course, when a teacher assumes a student cannot learn, it becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. But those possible mistakes should not prevent us from grappling with the challenge Esav confronts us with. There are many people with inborn shortcomings; how do we help them find the right point where they can grow and flourish? How do we find a meaningful place for them in our schools and communities? These people carry the burden of struggles far larger than anyone can imagine. May God grant us the wisdom and creativity to help them find their way.


Rabbi Chaim Steinmetz is the Senior Rabbi of Congregation Kehilath Jeshurun in New York.

What to Do With a Child Like Esav Read More »

Ten Lessons from Five Decades

I know that no one is supposed to admit their own age, but next week in New York City I’m celebrating my 55th birthday, God willing. To give it more substance, next Tuesday, at the same party, I’m launching my book “Kosher Hate” in a dialogue with New York Times Columnist Bret Stephens.

The famous American writer and author of “Fear of Flying,” Erica Jong, wrote a “midlife memoir” called “Fear of Fifty.” As you’d expect it talks about how we Americans have an insane fear of aging. Youth is glorified. Age is treated as a miserable illness. 

Perhaps we should consider the alternative.

To age is to live. Not to age is to be purged of the greatest blessing of all, life. And to age is to gain wisdom.

To age is to live. Not to age is to be purged of the greatest blessing of all, life. And to age is to gain wisdom.

And what I have learned in my half-century and five years on this earth, all of which has gone by in such a flicker? These are the ten most important things that I’ve gleaned as I cross into the middle of my fifth decade.

The first is that sins of omission are much greater than sins of commission. There can be no doubt that I regret the bad things I’ve done. But far worse are the good things that I have not done. Relationships, for example, are sometimes undone by a sin in the relationship. But much more often relationships die of the sin of neglect. I have seen many husbands and wives bounce back from mistakes. But I have seen far more people slowly lose their vitality and passion for life because they lack purpose.

I’ve also learned that real character comes not from the quantity of cash in our bank accounts but from the quality of our relationships. Sounds simple, I know. But it’s a truism we trample on every single day. Our society uses money as a commodity by which to purchase self-esteem. The net result is that men and women spend their lives focused on accumulating. But the biggest problem in the world today, and the one first identified in the Bible, is loneliness. All the money and status in the world will not make you feel appreciated for who you are. You overcome loneliness only when you’re in a relationship where you are loved and appreciated unconditionally.

The third thing I’ve learned is to confer dignity on all whom you meet. Try and make others feel important. It’s easier said than done, but so amazingly rewarding. God gave each of us an infinite supply of dignity that we can sprinkle on others, like confetti thrown on a bride and groom at their wedding. By simply being attentive to people, valuing their opinion, expressing gratitude, we make others feel like they matter. Most of what we do in life is an attempt to make ourselves feel significant. So if you crave it so much, grant that same gift to others as well. Give compliments. They’re free. So why be stingy? Make it sincere. Everyone has something to praise. Find it and offer it.

Next, is never to fear. That doesn’t mean we should live carelessly. But there is a difference between living in fear and living with caution. While fear is sometimes a hysterical response to an imagined threat, caution is simply a calculated reaction to a real danger. But get rid of the fear.

Also, learn to forgive. This lesson is arguably the hardest of all. We all feel wronged by others and forgiving is the most unnatural act of all.

Also, learn to forgive. This lesson is arguably the hardest of all. We all feel wronged by others and forgiving is the most unnatural act of all. Why overlook the harm done to us by people, especially if they haven’t yet taken responsibility for what they’ve done? Because nursing grudges makes us old before our time, even if we’re far younger than fifty-five.

The sixth lesson is for parents. As a parent your job is to make your children always feel valued. It’s not to get them into Harvard. It’s not to inspire them to launch an internet startup. Stop thinking that your objective as a parent is to make your child a “success.” I have seen so many children, successful on paper, who are still empty on the inside because they were never made to feel like they were loved unconditionally. The job of a parent is to validate their children not through their doing but through their being. I love you because you are. There is nothing you can do that will ever make me love you more, and there is nothing you can do that will ever make me love you less.

At 55, I’ve validated a choice I made long ago: to live for the Jewish people. The message is live for your nation, live for your country, live for your people. Live for a cause larger than yourself.

At 55, I’ve validated a choice I made long ago: to live for the Jewish people. The message is live for your nation, live for your country, live for your people. Live for a cause larger than yourself. Only when we connect with something eternal is our being lent a sense of the infinite. I mention the Jewish people not only because I’m Jewish but also because my people have been imperiled throughout their existence. Israel’s very survival is threatened even today by genocidal enemies that surround it. By fighting to defend Israel we connect with millennia of our compatriots who have preceded us and who have made the Jewish people one of the most influential in history. The same is true of fighting for America and all that it represents: freedom, liberty, human rights, and a commitment to the infinite and equal value of every person.

Lesson number eight: Read history and know what has preceded you. Sounds unexpected. But I can tell you that my love of history has placed my existence, my daily trials and my constant challenges in perspective. It lends me a sense of what human beings can ultimately contribute.

Honor your parents and cherish your spouse—another really difficult one. The people who give us the most love in life are often the ones who can give us the most pain. It’s almost inevitable in the parent-child relationship and the husband-wife partnership that love and pain will exist concurrently. But nothing tests our ability to appreciate and lend gratitude more than truly loving and respecting our parents and the partner with whom we share our lives. And nothing guarantees God’s blessing more than cherishing and showing living gratitude to our soul-mate.

Finally, the greatest lesson of all: I’ve learned that we must love God and serve him. This may come to you in different ways, either through formal religion or something more lived. But bring God into your life. Know that every day is a miracle. Stop sweating the small stuff and accept that there is a larger plan. Find your place in that plan. And throughout life never lose your sense of awe, majesty and wonder.


Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, whom the Washington Post calls “the most famous Rabbi in America,” has just completed Kosher Hate, which will be launched on November 16. Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.

Ten Lessons from Five Decades Read More »

Marjorie Taylor Greene Says There’s “Common Ground” With Nation of Islam Against COVID-19 Vaccine

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) issued a Twitter thread on November 8 saying “we have common ground” with the Nation of Islam (NOI) against the COVID-19 vaccines.

Greene wrote that she recently visited The District of Columbia (DC) Jail in Washington, D.C. and noticed that the jail was distributing NOI newspapers. She noted that the newspaper warned of “white hate” and “white rage” but also that the paper promotes the use of Ivermectin to treat COVID-19. The drug has been in the news of late because figures like podcaster Joe Rogan and NFL star quarterback Aaron Rodgers have used the drug while dealing with the virus. 

“The Nation of Islam sees the use and benefit of Ivermectin and is very angry that our media, Democrats, and Dr Fauci have attacked the drug and refuse to save people’s lives by not promoting it and shunning the use of it,” Greene tweeted. “We have common ground there.”

In a subsequent tweet, she noted that the NOI newspaper “is also strongly against the #COVID19 vaccines” and “very against children being given the #COVID19 vaccines. More common ground. Children should NOT be taking covid vaccines, as all data shows they are hardly at risk.”

She concluded her thread by stating: “I’m strongly opposed to radical Islam. But I do believe in freedom of religion guaranteed to us by our Constitution. Learning how opposed the Nation of Islam is to the #COVID19 vaccines, & already knowing how many Christians oppose the vaccines, we MUST ensure that Religious Exemptions are allowed for Vaccine Mandates. All vaccine mandates must end & children shouldn’t be vaxxed.”

Jemele Hill, who writes for The Atlantic, tweeted: “[Greene] aligning herself with the Nation of Islam is not the content I expected to see today, but here we are.” Greene replied to Hill by tweeting: “Clearly you can’t read Jemele, as I don’t align myself with Islam. Why aren’t you asking why the DC Jail has Nation of Islam papers all in the jail? Why don’t you care that they are against the jab & don’t want kids vaxxed? Those issues aren’t your cleared talking points?”

The Anti-Defamation League criticized Greene in a couple of tweets. “In her ongoing anti-vax disinformation campaign, @mtgreenee promotes the anti-vax & antisemitic Nation of Islam, including a student minister who said the pandemic was punishment for the ‘sins’ of Jews. This is ludicrous and must be condemned.”

They added: “Nation of Islam ideology regularly incorporates bigoted and discriminatory beliefs, aimed at Jews, Jews of color, mixed families and the LGBTQ+ community. No member of Congress should be touting ‘common ground’ with this organization.”

Marjorie Taylor Greene Says There’s “Common Ground” With Nation of Islam Against COVID-19 Vaccine Read More »

Unilever Defended Business in Iran, Syria, Cuba to SEC, Report Says

Past letters to the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) show that Unilever, the parent company of Ben & Jerry’s, defended its decision to do business in countries like Cuba, Iran and Syria.

The Daily Caller reported that in a 2020 letter to the SEC, Unilever acknowledged conducting business with a hotel affiliated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which the Trump administration designated as a terror group in 2019; the administration argued at the time “that the IRGC actively participates in, finances, and promotes terrorism as a tool of statecraft. The IRGC is the Iranian government’s primary means of directing and implementing its global terrorist campaign.” Unilever also acknowledge paying taxes and fees to the Iranian government in the letter.

Additionally, in separate letters to the SEC in 2006 and 2010, Unilever stated that the business it was conducting in Iran, Syria and Sudan was not with any state-run companies; in Cuba, they conducted business with a government-run manufacturing company. Unilever argued that their business in these countries was beneficial to poorer residents.

Marc Greendorfer, founder of the Zachor Legal Institute, told The Daily Caller that it was hypocritical for Unilever to allow Ben & Jerry’s to cease operating in the “Occupied Palestinian Territory” while continuing to do business in “countries with the worst human rights abuses,” after having “defended doing so to United States regulators on the basis that the operations are not material to their operations.” “Surely, the revenues from selling ice cream to Jews in their historic homeland are even less material to Unilever’s operations than, say, the revenues from doing business in Syria, Iran or Cuba, yet it looks like Unilever continues to do business in those countries as they boycott Jews.” He added that the SEC should mandate Unilever “to provide investors with full disclosure on the financial impact of engaging in boycotts so investors can make a reasoned decision as to whether the actions are material to their decision whether to buy, hold or sell their Unilever shares.”

Unilever did not respond to the Journal’s request for comment.

Arizona, New York, New Jersey and Florida are among the states that have announced that they will be divesting from Unilever after concluding that Ben & Jerry’s Israel move violates their anti-Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) laws. StandWithUs Co-Founder and CEO Roz Rothstein argued in a letter on behalf of StandWithUs and the Israeli American Coalition (IAC) for Action that Unilever does have the power to overrule Ben & Jerry’s and should do so.

“Ben and Jerry’s must explain—to you and to the investing public—how its social mission requires such a boycott when it signed a contract showing that doing business in Israel was consistent with its social mission,” Rothstein wrote. “Clearly, it is Ben and Jerry’s that is in breach, and it is within Unilever’s rights to reverse the Board.”

Unilever Defended Business in Iran, Syria, Cuba to SEC, Report Says Read More »