fbpx

August 29, 2021

7 Decades and 3 Wars Later, This 96-year-old Jewish Journalist is Still Writing

(JTA) — When Tom Tugend was 13 years old, he received news not uncommon for a teenager: His family was moving. His father, a respected physician, had taken a new job.

During the taxi ride to the airport, Tugend looked out at his beloved hometown. All around him were trees and poles covered with massive swastika banners.

The date was April 20, 1939, and Berlin was celebrating Adolf Hitler’s 50th birthday.

“Gee, I mean, they may not like the Jews, but it’s very nice of them to give us such a nice sendoff,” Tugend recalled with a laugh this month from his home here.

Now 96, Tugend is still offering shrewd takes on current events as a seasoned journalist who has written for countless Jewish publications — including The Jerusalem Post, the Jewish Chronicle, the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles and the Jewish Telegraphic Agency — over a seven-decade career in Jewish journalism.

Tugend, whose reporting career began in the U.S. Army, has contributed to JTA as a West Coast correspondent since at least 1989, and still writes about Israeli film, Jewish theater in Los Angeles and other stories related to the entertainment industry and Hollywood.

“You still get a certain kick in seeing your byline,” Tugend said. Plus, he added, there’s the benefit of free tickets to premieres –– a cheap date for him and Rachel, his wife of 64 years.

For an award-winning journalist, Tugend has quite a story of his own.

“There’s not going to be a war”

Tugend was born in 1925, eight years before Hitler came to power in Germany. He grew up in a Jewish community and devoted much of his attention to his love of soccer.

“Unless you lived up to the stereotype of the hook nose and horns growing out of your forehead, you weren’t bothered,” he said.

Tugend’s father, Gustav Tugendreich, was more alarmed by the rapidly changing outlook for Jews in Germany.

Tugendreich was an influential pediatrician who has been touted as the “father of public infant welfare” in Germany, according to the International Journal of Epidemiology. In 1911, Tugendreich turned down the directorship of an infant mortality center because the role would have required him to renounce Judaism.

Once Hitler came to power, Tugendreich was no longer permitted to treat non-Jewish patients.

“It killed him, not physically, but spiritually, emotionally,” Tugend said.

Tugendreich left for America before the rest of the family, securing a lectureship at Bryn Mawr College in suburban Philadelphia through a loophole in America’s immigration quota system. He wrote letters to his family in Berlin, urging them to take the next boat possible to get out of Europe.

“We all said, ‘Well isn’t that good old Dad, he’s always worried about nothing,’” Tugend said.

Even after Kristallnacht, during which the store of Tugend’s neighbor was smashed, Hitler convinced the German people that there would be no war. In retrospect, Tugend says he and his fellow countrymen were suffering from Stockholm syndrome, wherein victims develop a psychological bond with their captors.

Tom Tugend and a women pose for a photograph in April 1946.

Tom Tugend in April 1946. (Courtesy of Tom Tugend)

Fortunately, the Tugends listened to their father. They left Berlin four months before war broke out.

Upon his arrival in America, Tugend attended a Jewish summer camp and met other children who had seen newsreels and believed war was imminent in Germany.

“I said no, there’s not going to be a war,” he recounted. “I come from there, I know the situation. I can tell you there’s not going to be any war because that’s what all the German papers said.”

Even when he returned home to headlines of Germany’s invasion of Poland on Sept. 1, 1939, he was in disbelief.

“I said there must be some mistake,” Tugend recalled. “It can’t be.”

He added, “Obviously if I’d stayed there, we wouldn’t be having this conversation.”

A decade of war

The Jewish experience in Europe during the Nazi era is well documented. But what makes Tugend’s story unusual is that for him, acclimation to America was harder than life in Germany.

“I don’t generally talk about it because it goes so counter, it sounds almost disloyal that you say I had a more difficult time initially in the United States than I had in Germany,” Tugend said.

The prejudice was immediate. In eighth grade, Tugend’s class read Shakespeare’s “The Merchant of Venice,” which famously includes Shylock, a Jewish moneylender, as a main character. One of Tugend’s classmates, whom he had considered a friend, raised his hand and asked the teacher, “Wouldn’t you rather buy from an American than a Jew?”

The comment distressed Tugend.

“Here my whole dream was to become a 100% American, and this guy’s saying I can’t be a Jew and an American,” he said.

At 18, Tugend registered for the military draft. Still in high school, he was restless and wanted to get away from home. He was deployed in March 1944.

During his basic training in Florida, Tugend again encountered hostility toward Jews. There was a stereotype that Jews were cowards and draft dodgers, he said. Some of his fellow cadets had never met a Jewish person, and one was genuinely surprised that a Jew could even be in the Army — and that he didn’t have horns.

“I found out, even when the war started, that I was treated better if they thought I was a German than if they thought I was a Jew,” Tugend said. “It’s hard for people now to gauge the extent of antisemitism there was in America.”

At the time of his enlistment, the U.S. Army had just suffered heavy losses. So despite a high score on the Army’s IQ test, Tugend was assigned to the infantry, not intelligence.

“If Einstein had gone in the Army at that time, they would have put him in the infantry,” Tugend joked.

Once his training was complete, Tugend was shipped off to Marseille, where his unit endured a frigid winter in the Vosges Mountains, “freezing our nuts off in foxholes” while helping the 1st French Army fight SS units, he said.

Shortly before the war ended, Tugend’s superiors discovered that he spoke fluent German, and he was sent to southern Germany. There was a theory that some diehard Nazis had remained in each village to organize the resistance to the Allied occupiers. Tugend’s task was to find them.

“Suddenly you couldn’t find a single Nazi,” he said.

Tugend said the assignment came with a jarring power dynamic: Those he interrogated were suddenly deferential to the 19-year-old Jewish soldier at their door.

“I had been a refugee a few years before,” Tugend said. “They kicked me out, they were the masters. And suddenly they couldn’t be nice enough, and couldn’t do enough for us.

“And of course, each one, some of his best friends were Jews,” he added sarcastically.

Tugend returned to the U.S. in March 1946, though not for a long stay. Two years later, still restless, he went to fight in his second war: Israel’s War of Independence.

“Since a Jewish state is established only every 2,000 years, I was afraid I might not be around the next time,” he said.

Tugend served as a squad leader in an Anglo-Saxon (English speaking) anti-tank unit. But there was a problem: The unit didn’t have any anti-tank guns. At least at first.

During a major engagement in the Negev, Tugend’s unit had surrounded an Egyptian troop commanded by the future president of Egypt, Gamal Abdel Nasser. Czechoslovakia had just sent the Israeli army a shipment of anti-tank guns that were left over from World War II — a  welcome delivery for the strapped unit.

There was one catch: The guns had originally been made for Germany, so the barrels were emblazoned with large swastikas.

“If you want an example of complete irony, what is better than a bunch of Jew boys from the Diaspora shooting at the Egyptians with a swastika?” Tugend recalled with a chuckle.

After the war, with Israel established, Tugend returned to California and completed his journalism degree. His education would come in handy almost immediately when a different conflict erupted — in Korea.

Tugend was drafted again in 1950. He feared another combat assignment, but with his journalism degree in hand, Tugend was sent instead to the Presidio of San Francisco, a military base where he spent a year editing a newspaper for the Letterman Army Medical Center.

As he dryly put it, “the only thing more important than killing commies was to put out a newspaper.”

The newspaperman

And then, as Tugend says, he ran out of wars. His stint at the Army paper introduced him to the San Francisco Chronicle, where he would go on to work as a copy boy, obituary writer and court reporter. He also worked on the night desk at the Los Angeles Times.

Tugend said he’d always wanted to be a writer, but thought he didn’t have it in him to be a “serious” writer, like a novelist.

“If I write an 800-word article, I feel like I’ve written ‘War and Peace,’” he quipped, referencing the 600,000-word novel.

Instead, Tugend worked in journalism and communications roles. After the Korean War, he wrote pilot manuals at Boeing, and later enjoyed a 30-year stint at the University of California, Los Angeles, where he worked as a science writer, among other roles.

Beginning in 1964, Tugend also worked part-time for Jewish newspapers, first in Los Angeles and then around the globe. When he retired from UCLA in 1989, Jewish journalism became his primary focus.

Tugend is not religiously observant, but he said he has always felt an attachment to his Judaism.

“I realized when Hitler came to power that whatever happened to the Jews would affect me,” he said.

Lisa Hostein, the longtime former JTA editor in chief and current executive editor of Hadassah Magazine, remembers meeting Tugend on a Jewish press trip to Argentina in 1986.

Hostein has worked with and edited countless reporters, especially in Jewish journalism. She told JTA that Tugend stands out for his professionalism and attention to detail. On foreign trips, she recalled, Tugend would always know what questions to ask high-level officials, and he made sure to get every title and name correct.

“He was always the consummate professional and gentleman,” she said.

Journalism also turned into a family affair. Tugend’s daughter, Alina, is a freelance writer who covers education for The New York Times and other national publications. She said she shares her father’s temperament and his love of speaking with and listening to others.

“I don’t think I consciously thought, ‘Oh, he’s a journalist, that’s what I want to do,’” Alina Tugend, 61, told JTA, recalling that her father frequently brought notes from his day scrawled on yellow paper to the dinner table to share with the family. “It was more being surrounded by people.”

Tugend is a Lifetime Achievement Award recipient from the American Jewish Press Association, and has been honored as well by the Greater Los Angeles Press Club and the Society of Professional Journalists.

So what’s his favorite story that he’s written?

The first that comes to mind is a 2016 piece he wrote for the Jewish Journal about himself. Tugend recounts his story and reflects on his life of service.

“It’s OK if we bullshit each other,” Tugend said, “but maybe we shouldn’t bullshit ourselves.”

Tom Tugend on the cover of The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, May 2016.

Tom Tugend on the cover of The Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, May 2016. (Courtesy of Tom Tugend)

He’s not being facetious. As a veteran, Tugend says he brings an important perspective to journalism. While war is inherently dramatic, Tugend has noticed a tendency in the American media to glorify patriotism. Who better to provide honest reporting about war than those who have lived through it?

“The most overused four-letter word is ‘hero,’” Tugend said before offering a few other similarly overused four-letter words not fit for publication.

Heroism is a topic about which Tugend feels rather passionate. Moral courage, he says, is a very rare characteristic, especially in the context of the Holocaust. His real heroes are those across Europe who saved lives by hiding and protecting Jews.

“Those to me are my only genuine heroes –– those who stood up at the risk of their lives to shield somebody with whom they had no connection,” Tugend said. “You knew that if you were caught, you were dead and probably your family would be killed, and nevertheless to do it because you felt as a human being you had to do it.”

7 Decades and 3 Wars Later, This 96-year-old Jewish Journalist is Still Writing Read More »

Ed Asner, Emmy-award Winning Actor, 91

Ed Asner,  the only actor to have won an Emmy for playing the same character on two different TV series, died Sunday morning (Aug. 29) at his home in Tarzana at the age of 91.

The cause of his death was not specified.

Although he appeared in over 200 movies and TV shows, Asner will be best remembered as the blustering but warm-hearted newsman in the TV comedy “The Mary Tyler Moore Show” and its successor drama, “Lou Grant.” In the latter, he played the tough city editor of the fictitious Los Angeles Tribune.

Edward David Asner was born in Kansas City, Mo., in 1929, the youngest of five children of Orthodox immigrants. His father, Morris David Asner, was a junkyard owner and his mother Lizzi (Seliger) was a native of Russia.

“We were Midwestern Orthodoxy,” Asner recalled. ‘My mother didn’t wear a  sheitel and my father drove to shul. I was raised to believe that giving back to your community is the good and right way above all, and that were needed to uphold the faith, and if we upheld it, we would be doing right.”

Drafted into the U.S. Army in 1951, Asner served in France and was discharged in 1953.  He married Nancy Sykes in 1959. They had three children: twins Matthew and Liza, and Kate. They divorced in 1988, a year after fathered had a son, Charles, with Carol Jean Vogelman. Ten years later, he married Cindy Gilmore, a producer. They separated in 2007 and formally divorced in 2015.

Asner almost became a newsman in real life. He studied journalism at the University of Chicago until a professor told him that there was little money to be made in that profession. He quickly switched to drama.

He started out in smaller roles, supporting John Wayne and Robert Mitchum in 1967’s “El Dorado” and Elvis Presley in 1969’s “Change of Habit.” On TV, he made guest appearances on “Route 66,” “The Untouchables,” “The Mod Squad,” and “Alfred Hitchcock Presents.”

His audition for the role that made him famous did not go well. “Mary Tyler Moore Show” co-creator James Brooks told Variety that a few minutes after he auditioned,  “Asner came bustling back into the room and earnestly asked to do it again. ‘I can do it so much better than that.’”  Brooks also called Asner “a beautiful actor…He was an able team player. He was just as deeply a good guy as everybody sensed he was.”

From 1981 to 1985, Asner served as president of the Screen Actors Guild. In 1982 hedonated $25,000 for medical aid to the guerillas in, who were fighting the U.S.-backed right wing military government in El Salvador.

For this action, Asner was widely criticized. His response: “I have an obligation to speak out for the cause of justice and to protest human misery and will continue to do so.”

A month later CBS cancelled “Lou Grant,” claiming the show was losing its punch.

Current SAG-AFTRA president Gabrielle Carteris praised Asner’s activism. “There have been few actors of Ed Asner’s prominence who risked their status to fight for social causes the way Ed did. He fought passionately for his fellow actors, both before, during and after his SAG presidency. But his concern did not stop with performers. He fought for victims of poverty, violence, war, and legal and social injustice, both in the United States and around the globe.”

Asner also took a role weighed in on the debate over the future of Israel, telling the Journal in 2005  “I think, just as we are learning in Iraq now, that the greatest power on earth can’t necessarily command peace.”

“Imposing a peace is not as precious as winning by compromise and peaceful, cooperative talks….”I’m amazed by Israel’s militaristic achievements and accomplishments, and yet I think I gloried more at the Jewish image of the Children of the Book. I can only hope that when a peace is finally arrived at in the Middle East, Israel can beat some of those swords into plowshares and return to being the great light of the world the Jews have always been.”

Asner won seven Emmy Awards: Three times as supporting actor in a comedy for “The Mary Tyler Moore Show,” twice as lead actor in a drama for “Lou Grant,” and once each for his roles in “Rich Man, Poor Man” and “Roots.”

His comic turn in Will Farrell’s “Elf” and voicing the irascible Carl Friedricksen in Pixar’s 2009’s hit “Up” introduced Asner to a new generation.

Asner is survived by his four children, twins Matthew and Liza, daughter Kate and son Charles.

In the announcement of Edward Asner’s death, his official Twitter account included a note from his children.

“We are sorry to say that our beloved patriarch passed away this morning peacefully. Words cannot express the sadness we feel. With a kiss on your head—Good night, dad. We love you.”

Ed Asner, Emmy-award Winning Actor, 91 Read More »

America: After the Taliban, Get Ready for Iran

Far be it from me to extract a silver lining from a gold mine of regional instability, but if the evacuation of Afghanistan is a preview of the impending revival of the Iran deal, let’s save us all the embarrassment and roll out the Persian rugs for the Ayatollahs now. Given America’s botched exit from Afghanistan and ensuing terror attacks that took the lives of 13 U.S. troops, and the Biden administration’s surreal trust in the Taliban, it will be impossible for Iranians to keep a straight face in any direct negotiations.

Last time, as a condition of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA, the formal name for the Iran deal), we unfroze $150 billion in Iranian assets and rewarded them with a $1.8 billion cash payment. This time don’t be surprised if they sell us the Brooklyn Bridge.

It’s not farfetched. The foreign policy team that supervised America’s end of days in Kabul are the same people who, while in the Obama administration, assured us that the Ayatollahs could be trusted not to spin centrifuges for enriched weapons-grade uranium. The deal contemplated surveillance cameras to inspect Iran’s nuclear facilities in case they cheated.

The foreign policy team that supervised America’s end of days in Kabul are the same people who, while in the Obama administration, assured us that the Ayatollahs could be trusted not to spin centrifuges for enriched weapons-grade uranium.

We were told that oil-sloshed Iran, improbably, intended its stockpiles of nuclear energy for civilian, peaceful purposes only. Who in their right mind would doubt that? When an extremist, Islamist nation repeatedly threatens Israel’s erasure from the map, they don’t mean literally, like with Wite-Out, but the real deal, eliminating the country itself, with warheads!

It’s time we start listening more seriously to those who take steps toward, and make threats of, another nation’s annihilation. Iran is a great object lesson, but are we prepared to read their intentions more honestly?

Yes, President Trump decertified the Iran deal, but the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran stockpiled 273 kilograms of enriched uranium—16 times what was permitted under the JCPOA. Moreover, three undeclared enrichment sites were discovered that received no monitoring at all. As for inspections, surveillance cameras were found to be either broken or restricted, with the precise data unknown, especially in Natanz, which is conveniently underground.

Worse still, the agreement never addressed Iran’s formidable ballistic missile program or promiscuous patronage of terrorists everywhere.

The faces behind the Iran deal should be familiar to anyone watching the unfolding debacle in Afghanistan. Secretary of State Antony Blinken was the National Security Advisor to then Vice-President Biden and a principle architect of the Iran nuclear talks. President Biden’s National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, was a senior advisor to Barack Obama on the Iran deal. In 2015, the lead negotiator was Robert Malley, who President Biden recently appointed as his U.S. Special Envoy on Iran. In 2008, the British Times reported that Malley had some troubling contacts with Hamas.

All of them received promotions in the new Biden administration, and all three are invested in establishing friendlier diplomatic relations with Iran—even if it means lifting the numerous sanctions that have crippled Iran’s economy.

President Biden told Israeli Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett, that his approach to Iran will be through diplomacy first, but if diplomacy doesn’t work, he’ll consider “other options.” After Afghanistan, who will take his warnings seriously?

The Biden braintrust, as the debacle in Afghanistan amply demonstrates, will trust anybody. They hold themselves out to be experts in Middle Eastern affairs. For the sake of America’s future, we’d all rest easier knowing that Biden has a deeper bench than just these three.

Remember President Obama’s placating foreign policy in the Middle East? Soon after taking office, he traveled to Cairo to apologize to the Arab world, then neglected to visit Jerusalem. He drew a red line on Syria that was immediately wiped away, which allowed President Assad to gas his own people in a civil war that would claim over half a million lives. The United States led from behind while France took the lead in Libya. A civil war erupted in Yemen without America seeming to notice. Hezbollah operated freely in Lebanon without any objection.

Obama first toured Israel as a candidate for the presidency in 2008. He famously commented that he would do everything in his power to protect his own daughters should they face such existential threats. When it came to Israeli parents, however, he and his foreign policy team insisted in 2014 that Israel use restraint in defending against rocket bombardments from Gaza.

The misreading of this region was endless. Who can forget that Obama dismissively referred to ISIS as the “JV team.” That would be the same terrorist outfit that just recently engineered the two bombings and a shootout in Kabul, with more planned attacks underway.

Iran held its elections and a new hardliner was installed as president. But even a softie could have his way with America. The events as of late reveal not a ferocious but a feckless America, unwilling to stand up for itself and its allies.

Our foreign policy priorities appear to be nonexistent. Domestically, the nation is seriously debating whether to defund its police. America’s global enemies can reasonably conclude that it has lost its will to fight, that its descent into moral relativism makes no distinction between good and bad guys.

America’s global enemies can reasonably conclude that it has lost its will to fight, that its descent into moral relativism makes no distinction between good and bad guys.

Social workers deployed to answer the call of crime victims in Chicago’s South Side can also be sent to reason with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, ISIS-K, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard.

We are left to wonder: When Biden’s foreign policy gurus survey a map of the Middle East, what do they see? Abandoning Afghanistan and stranding Americans and Afghan allies apparently raised no concerns. Forfeiting a strategic airport and gifting weapons to the Taliban was, apparently, a nice way to welcome terrorists to the community of nations.

Our objective in Afghanistan two decades ago went unfinished. We now find ourselves saluting our enemy and begging them to grant us safe passage to airports we once controlled.

Democratic administrations have long had a fondness for Ivy Leaguers who mastered the Ancient Greeks yet have little understanding of the world and the unsavory characters who inhabit it. All too happy to cut deals with terrorists who chant, “Death to America.” Almost immediately they conclude: “What a wonderful group of guys. Do they summer in Palm Springs?”

The 1979 Islamic Revolution in Iran coincided with the taking of 53 American hostages for 444 days. The lone rescue attempt resulted in helicopters stuck in the desert sand.

Nowadays our heads are stuck in the sand, too.

One final question: When it comes to negotiating with Muslim extremists, do we even have a varsity team?

America: After the Taliban, Get Ready for Iran Read More »