fbpx

May 16, 2021

When Hitler Stole the Pink Rabbit

The first reaction when confronted by a movie titled “When Hitler Stole the Pink Rabbit” is to anticipate a biting satire on the Nazi regime or, alternately, that the producer had one drink too many during an all-night skull session.

Actually, the title refers to a story without a single swastika or murderous storm trooper in sight. It is told from the perspective of a bright young girl, whose family decides to leave its native Berlin the moment Hitler assumes power as Germany’s chancellor, but long before anyone could even imagine a Holocaust.

Nine-year old Anna and her older brother Max are the children of a well-known Berlin theater critic and writer, named Arthur Kemper, who has frequently criticized Hitler and his Nazi bullies.   “The swastika is a symbol of stupidity,” he tells his children.

That alone would be enough to fear for the family’s safety, not to mention that the parents are Jews, though thoroughly assimilated.

A short time earlier, Anna’s Uncle Julius had gifted his niece with a large stuffed pink rabbit, which becomes her inseparable companion, but which has to be left behind when the family hastily packed its suitcases for a “vacation” in Switzerland.

Later, the rabbit is confiscated by Nazi officials, along with everything else left behind by the Kemper family.

Initially, Anna and Max look at the family’s new refugee status as a grand adventure, aside from having to learn new languages, from Swiss German, then French as the family moves to Paris, and finally English, a devilish hard language to pronounce correctly, as the Kempers settle for good in England.

At this point of the movie I was struck by a strong sense of déjà vu, recalling my parents’ lifestyle in Berlin, as, also assimilated Jews, we gathered around the Christmas tree with the gentile governess and cook, and the sense of adventure as our Lufthansa plane took off for London in May 1939, before we took ship to New York.

The movie is graced by an excellent cast, foremost Riva Krymalowski as Anna, whose perspective of life as a child refugee anchors the film’s plot and perspective. Her mother grew up in Russia, her father in East Germany and her Jewish grandparents survived the Holocaust.

“From the beginning, Riva had a deep understanding of the era dominating the movie,” said Caroline Link, the film’s director.

Furthermore, when you live in Germany nowadays, “you are constantly confronted by the refugee situation,” Link added. “When you talk to a class, you quickly realize that it includes many refugees, but now they are mainly from Iraq and Syria…Some Jewish students feel threatened by their Muslim classmates and the anti-Semitism of their native countries.”

The foundation of the film is a 1971 semi-biographical novel by the late Judith Kerr and when director Link first read it in school, she was struck by the “lightness” of the story.

Within the context of familiarizing today’s generation of young Germans – and others – with the history of the Nazi regime, Link considers the story’s lightness a major plus.

“It is natural that the Nazi past of our country has a great fascination for the artists, writers and filmmakers in Germany, and for me it was a challenge,” she said. “It is important that we don’t always show the same stereotypes and the same old clichés…It is important to find new perspectives in looking back at that era.

“That’s particularly important for young people, who are growing up now and really have no memory and connection to the past to convey an awareness of how quickly the political situation of a country and system can change.

“In discussing things we now take for granted, like freedom of speech and tolerance, it is very important to use the right language to reach the young people. If you repeat the same old patterns, then you lose the young people and any impact on their memory.

“I face a similar situation when I talk to young people in Israel,” Link added. “They tell me “We are sick and tired of what we read about Germany. We want to see the new Germany and we want to travel to Berlin. Berlin is hip.”

Though both parents and children in “Pink Rabbit” do their best to view their enforced travel as an adventure, the film clearly shows that the life of a refugee – even though well educated and adaptable –is a rough one.

While Anna and Max have to adjust to classes taught in a strange language and find new friends, the father faces rejection as he tries to resume his journalistic career.

Talking to the editor of a leading Swiss newspaper, the father is cautioned not to include any criticism of the Hitler regime. “We don’t want to offend the Germans,” the editor explains.

Without income, money is a constant problem. Anna proudly turns over 10 francs, a reward from her teacher for having written the outstanding paper in her class. To which the family’s cranky landlady snidely remarks, “You Jews always have to be the best.”

During another financial crisis, Anna resourcefully fishes out the coins flipped by tourists into a picturesque Paris fountain.

The final stop on the family’s journey is London, where, in an upbeat postscript, young Max grows up to become the first foreign-born immigrant to be appointed to the British High Court.

“When Hitler Stole Pink Rabbit” opens May 21 at the two Laemmle theaters, the Royal in West Los Angeles and the Town Center in Encino, and may open in additional Laemmle venues. The film can also be viewed on the Laemmle virtual cinema platform by accessing www.watch.laemmle.com.

When Hitler Stole the Pink Rabbit Read More »

The Rituals of War: Reflections on Israel and Gaza

Maybe it’s because my wife is a therapist. Or maybe it’s because my favorite religious literature is the writings of Hasidic masters. Both psychology and Hasidic thought aim to understand how our inner thoughts and impulses drive our perceptions of the world. Both recognize that the human soul carries within it many unknowns that create unconscious habits. Without awareness of those instinctual patterns, we tend to repeat ourselves.

Over this past week of warfare between Israel and Hamas, I’ve see how quickly we have all fallen into our standard ritualized responses.

Before elaborating, it’s worth reminding ourselves of how much is at stake. The death toll in Gaza and Israel ticks upwards. Children die. Fear and anger permeate society. Civil unrest and the rule of the mob mark the streets of Israel. Pain rules the day.

While a few brave souls move toward the pain, most of us distance ourselves from it. Pain hurts. It is uncomfortable. We try to avoid it at all cost, even when it can be helpful to our personal or national growth.

There are, of course, many sorts of pain. The horrors of war are first and foremost what occupies us, as they should. But in Israel and the Middle East, everything takes on symbolic meaning. As harsh as it is to state, the sanctity of life is not always the most important factor. Our attachment to our symbolic values helps us fend off pain and allows us a sense of control in what is otherwise a situation of chaos and upheaval. Because it is difficult to sit in a place of pain and loss, we ritualize our values in what is too often a mindless pattern.

What this looks like is easily seen. Whenever violence flares up in Israel, the Palestinians accuse Israel of bearing sole responsibility for the current state of carnage, as do other enemies of the Jewish state.

Within the Jewish world, both in Israel and America, a different set of rituals plays out. One segment of our community will instinctively describe a situation in which Israel is the victim of terror and must defend herself and her citizens. Another equally sizable portion of the community does the very opposite, reducing a complex history to a few talking points. If Israel only did X, Y or Z, or refrained from doing A, B, or C, none of this would have happened. A smaller coterie will attempt to frame the conflict in a complex analysis that seeks to incorporate more information.

Each of these groups is certain that they understand how we got here. Each claims that it knows the real causes, and not responding based on their stance is immoral.

But how do we know this? What sort of analysis has anyone done within a week of the current situation? I’d argue that mostly we have fallen back on ritualized patterns and habits. Some of us are psychologically served when we blame the Palestinians. It absolves us of responsibility. Some of us gain moral benefit when we blame Israel for what happened. We also get to wash our hands of moral responsibility by our high-sounding utterances. Others retreat to moral equivalencies. Yes, Hamas attacked, but it was in response to Israel’s attempts at home evictions (curtailed by Israel’s Supreme Court). By creating moral equivalencies, we feel we are being even-handed, and this also is a form of psychic cleansing.

We all tend to gravitate to one of these tactics, and most of the time, we aren’t even aware that we are running through a script, an unconscious ritual of war.

Most of the time, we aren’t even aware that we are running through a script, an unconscious ritual of war.

Do you remember when Ariel Sharon visited the Temple Mount, which purportedly sparked the Second Intifada? All of the above dynamics played out. For quite a while, the segment of the Jewish world that likes to blame itself found it convenient to hang all guilt on Sharon’s admittedly unwise visit. It took a long time before the Mitchell Report made it clear that the Second Intifada had long been in the planning stages and was merely waiting for the proper pretext. The rituals of introspection and self-blame that we Jews do so well (think of teshuvah and Yom Kippur) occurred in a vacuum of knowledge. Once we knew, few who blamed Sharon for inciting the violence publicly recanted. The ritual is too valuable to relinquish in the face of some inconvenient truths.

Can’t we all, just for a moment, sit in the pain and devastation? Can’t we weep at the loss of life and the terrors of violence? Can’t we wail because we are here again? Isn’t there a way in which admitting the pain into our hearts and minds can actually have a greater political impact than these reflexive rituals? If that sounds too quietist, let’s remember the absolute shock of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The pain of witnessing entire cities vaporized in an instant was so searing that as a consequence, humanity has successfully refrained from nuclear war. Allowing ourselves not to deflect or defend ourselves from that overwhelming grief changed the entire world. In its aftermath, we were able to create international structures meant to reduce the possibility of further nuclear war. If you want to understand Iran and our attempts to curtail her acquisition of nuclear weapons, there’s a clear line leading us back.

Finally, I want to state that I stand unequivocally with Israel. Just as saying Black Lives Matter doesn’t mean other lives don’t, my belief in the right to a Jewish homeland and Israel’s right to defend itself doesn’t mean Palestinians don’t deserve a state of their own. I stand with Israel because half of my people live there. I stand with Israel because she represents perhaps the greatest miracle in Jewish history. I stand with Israel because my friends live there. I stand with Israel because she has constantly been besieged throughout her short existence, and still she has thrived beyond anyone’s wildest imaginings. I stand with Israel because it is where we entered the stage of human history, and it is where we make history today. I stand with Israel not because it is perfect and doesn’t make its share of blunders, but because it is the historic and eternal home of the Jewish people. Ain li eretz acheret.

May Israel know peace, and may we all.


David Kosak is the senior rabbi of Congregation Neveh Shalom in Portland, Oregon.

The Rituals of War: Reflections on Israel and Gaza Read More »

Israel’s Wartime Secret? Its Human Iron Dome

I was watching the Israeli news the other night (who can sleep in such times?) when a notice appeared on the screen: Hamas launched rockets into Tel Aviv, and sirens were blaring everywhere. It was around 1 am in Israel. The reporter, running for cover, entered a local pub and joined a few young Israelis for safety. While there, she asked one of them why he wasn’t home. I will take any precautionary measure, he said, but will not allow Hamas to change my life.

“How about going to sleep, at least, and getting some rest? the reporter asked. Who can sleep at such times, the young man replied, when there is so much to do. I, and my friends, have teamed up to work on renovating shelters all over Israel. This is something we don’t just do during war times, but now it is very much needed.

Meanwhile, in the nearby city of Ramat-Gan, a couple who owns a clothing store lamented the destruction of their family business, which had been just renovated. “It will take time to get back to business,” they said, “but return to business we shall. The store will go back to normal because nothing will break us. Am Yisrael Chai.”

A pediatrician, whose clinic was also met with Hamas missiles, told the local news that the only things left standing were the small drawings the children made, hanging on the wall. “We are just thankful this happened on Saturday, when no one was here,” she said, “and we will get back to work as quickly as possible.”

Israelis’ determination in times of war is augmented by a profound sense of solidarity. A flower shop owner was touched to see lines of Israelis who came to her bombarded little shop to buy flowers for Shavuot. “My grandson posted on Facebook and invited Israelis to buy flowers from the ruined shop, and people started coming from all over Israel. We started tearing up. We simply could not believe our eyes. I want to thank Am Yisrael for their support, sympathy and love.”

Israelis’ determination in times of war is augmented by a profound sense of solidarity.

Israel is going through some horrible and dangerous days. Millions of Israelis are tuned to the sirens alerting them to the dangers of rockets from Gaza. Hamas terrorists have fired, so far, nearly 3,000 rockets indiscriminately into civilian centers in Israel, with the sole purpose of killing, injuring, and maiming as many people as possible. One can only imagine the extent of damage and casualties had Israelis been exposed and unprotected.

Attacks against Israel have evolved over time. After large-scale wars came the era of suicide bombers aimed at innocent coffee drinkers, shoppers and passengers on buses. When all those failed, the Boycott, Divestment movement did its best to bring the Jewish state to its knees. But Israel’s immense energy of creativity, ingenuity, and contributions to the world was too vital. Thus, they failed again, despite ongoing efforts to this very day.

Now came the age of tunnels, rockets and missiles. The first rocket launched by Hamas was in April 2001, over 20 years ago. For more than two decades, and through several military operations by Israel, Hamas has fired more than 20,000 rockets into Israel.

Thank G-d for Iron Dome.

The development of Iron Dome, Israel’s mobile all-weather air defense system, began in 2006. It was initiated by then Israeli Minister of Defense Amir Peretz — who did so against the dissenting view of Israel’s Defense Establishment. Peretz lives in the southern town of Sderot, which suffered immensely over the years from Hamas’ rocket terror. Israelis owe him a tremendous debt of gratitude. The United States, under then-President Barack Obama, joined the effort and provided funding for continuous development and improvement of the Iron Dome.

In addition to the ingenuity of the Iron Dome, the human factor has been key to Israel’s resiliency and survival. Hassan Nasrallah, the infamous leader of the Lebanese Shiite terrorist organization Hezbollah — another Iranian proxy — once famously characterized Israeli society as weaker than a spiderweb. Based on that assumption, he went to war with Israel in 2006 and learned a hard lesson. Israelis’ resolve is immeasurable. He hasn’t attacked Israel since.

In addition to the ingenuity of the Iron Dome, the human factor has been key to Israel’s resiliency and survival.

The Iron Dome is a blessing, and many Israelis owe it their lives. But Israel’s real power source — her “secret weapon” — is its people. It is their ingenuity, creativity and determination to win against all odds, regardless of the condemnations it receives from a hypocritical world that often holds it to an unfair double standard.

This human factor is the ultimate deterrence against enemies. It is what makes dreams come true and what made Israel what it is today: a beacon of light, hope and progress, not just for Israelis but for the world — even a world that has yet to appreciate it.


Shahar Azani is a former Israeli diplomat and Senior Vice President at JBS.

Israel’s Wartime Secret? Its Human Iron Dome Read More »

How Could Rabbinical Students Ignore Israel’s Right to Defend Itself?

I was aghast to read a letter signed by close to 100 rabbinical students– future leaders of the Jewish community who will serve in pulpits, on college campuses and within Jewish organizations– which shamefully ignores Israel’s right, let alone duty, to defend her citizens.

As a rabbi who sat in those houses of study both in Néw York and in Jerusalem, it pains me greatly to see the lack of support and understanding of Israel from these students. I would like to address their points directly.

You claim that our tears must be directed to injustices. But where are your tears for the millions of Israeli civilians—Jews, Muslims and Christians—who have been huddled in bomb shelters for the past week because a terrorist group has rained nearly 3,000 rockets on them?

Where are your tears for the millions of Israeli civilians—Jews, Muslims and Christians—who have been huddled in bomb shelters for the past week because a terrorist group has rained nearly 3,000 rockets on them?

Where are your tears for the residents of Kibbutz Aza, Netivot and Sderot who have been terrorized by those same rockets ever since Israel evacuated Gaza more than 15 years ago? Visit their communities where for years balloons have floated over the border for children to run after, soon to find out the string was attached to an explosive to inflict harm.

Instead, you seem embarrassed that Israel has been forced to have an army strong enough to defend its inhabitants. Here is the simple truth, quoting Rabbi David Wolpe, that you blatantly ignored: “If Hamas stopped raining rockets on Israel, it would be over. If Israel stopped defending and retaliating, it would be slaughter.”

You ask that when we teach, we should teach about the “human beings who didn’t ask for new neighbors.” For this I ask you to return to your classrooms and review the dates of 586 BCE and 70 CE, when the Jewish Temples of Jerusalem were destroyed. Rather than being a “new neighbor,” the Jewish presence in Israel is ancient. Please also review your modern Israeli history, with momentous dates of 1929, 1948, 1967, 1973, 1982, 2007, 2009, 2014 and 2021, when our presence as an ancient neighbor was not just a nuisance but a necessary evil to uproot.

And please review the multiple offers of peace which were not only rejected without counteroffers but were met with more death and destruction, bus bombings, stabbings and other violence against the Jewish people.

You ask that when we vote, not to vote for leaders who fund violence. Please review once again that it was the bi-partisanship from both sides of the aisle that funded the modern military miracle of the Iron Dome, which has saved thousands of lives.

You ask how we as Jews who were involved with racial reckoning in our communities this past year are not using our voices now to implicate Israel with racist violence. Racist? From the one country in the Middle East that has embraced more than 100 different nationalities and where Muslims have the most amount of freedom, rights and educational opportunities in the region? Where Israeli Arabs sit on the Supreme Court and in the government and run hospitals?

Before you jump to the “racist” slur, talk to the Black pastor of Faithful Central Bible Church, a leader in the black community, who was aghast at the thousands of bombs raining on Israeli civilians and who wrote this to me: “I am shocked and saddened. My community prays with you.”

We at Sinai Temple stood with his community last June during the racial protests, and he is with us now. He has spoken from our pulpit on MLK Shabbat year after year, and he has spoken about the importance of defending Israel, in my synagogue and in his church. I urge you to speak to pastors and other faith leaders outside of your community who understand the dangers facing Israel. Learn from their support of Israel, a support that is hardly “blind.”

Finally, you conclude: “We need to look at the realities we have been denying, allow ourselves to feel the hurt, and build from there.”

I completely agree—-let us begin together with the reality that the State of Israel has not just the right, but the responsibility to defend its citizens. Let us also not deny the reality that the biggest enemies of the Palestinian people have been their corrupt, Jew-hating leaders, who use Israel as a scapegoat for their failures, endanger the lives of their own people, and, in Gaza, build rockets and tunnels rather than schools.

My aunt and uncle made Aliyah in 1967. They were studying abroad in Jerusalem when the Six Day War broke out. They witnessed the Torah scrolls reaching the Kotel for the first time in 2000 years and decided they would never leave.

And today, on that Shavuot anniversary, we read of rabbinical students not willing to make that same commitment to the miraculous Jewish state. We live in the United States of America, a free country with a wide marketplace of ideas. When I returned from a recent trip to Israel, where we met Israelis and Palestinians, I penned a column entitled, “It’s Complicated.” I came back with more questions than answers. I have never pretended that Israel is a perfect country. Just like the United States, it has plenty of flaws and serious and complicated problems and challenges.

But “complicated” does not mean we cannot support Israel and her right to defend itself. If anything, it means we must support that very basic human right.

Shivim panim latorah– there are seventy faces and different interpretations of the Torah. But there is only one Israel. Especially while its people are huddling in bomb shelters, we ought not abandon her. 


Rabbi Erez Sherman is a rabbi at Sinai Temple in Los Angeles and was ordained from the Jewish Theological Seminary of America in 2009

How Could Rabbinical Students Ignore Israel’s Right to Defend Itself? Read More »

Discussing the Gaza Dilemma with Military Expert Michael Herzog

Israel’s policy toward Gaza is fraught with dilemmas, says Brig. General (Res.) Michael Herzog. Its policy is based on containment and its current goal is to communicate a clear message that Hamas miscalculated when it opened fire on Israeli cities. Whether the Biden administration is going to give Israel the time to deliver such a message, only time will tell.

In today’s podcast, Herzog argues that, up until now, no one presented a viable and practical plan that could alter the situation in Gaza. The Palestinian Authority is too weak to control Gaza, Israel does not wish to control it, and a chaos without any control would not be better than Hamas rule. Under such conditions, Israel has little choice but to try and deter Hamas from launching attacks on Israel, by making sure that such attacks result in Hamas losing more than it is gaining. International pressure makes such a goal a complicated one to achieve.

Herzog is a former IDF senior officer. He rose through the military ranks to become head of the IDF’s strategic planning division, then moved to hold senior positions in the office of Israel’s Minister of Defense, under four ministers and was the Chief of Staff to Minister Ehud Barak. He is currently a fellow at the Washington Institute and the Jewish People Policy Institute.

Full conversation below.

Follow Shmuel Rosner on Twitter.

Discussing the Gaza Dilemma with Military Expert Michael Herzog Read More »

If Biden Stops Israel Too Soon, Hamas Will Know it Can Get Away With Murder

I was too critical of the Biden administration. Last week, I suggested that the administration is failing a test by Hamas, and isn’t giving Israel enough leeway as it attempts to rein in the terror organization and deter it from future attacks. That was premature. Biden, to his credit, did not rush to act. After speaking with Netanyahu, he instructed his diplomats to postpone a Security Council meeting, and thus gave Israel more time to act.

He should get credit for it, because Biden – like all politicians – does not operate in a vacuum. He is President of the United States but also the leader of the Democratic Party. And his party is split over Israel. He “doesn’t seem to have gotten the memo”, wrote Alex Ward in Vox. What memo? The one concerning “greater willingness to criticize Israel and speak up in defense of the rights of Palestinians”. And if you, the reader, also didn’t get the memo, you can get it here, in an op-ed in The New York Times by Biden’s former rival and current ally Bernie Sanders. “Let’s be clear. No one is arguing that Israel, or any government, does not have the right to self-defense or to protect its people”, writes Sanders. But then he makes this exact argument: “In this moment of crisis, the United States should be urging an immediate cease-fire,” Sanders writes, not realizing (or maybe realizing and not caring) that a cease-fire would hand a victory to Hamas, and that a Hamas victory is the way to deny Israel the ability to defend itself.

Christian Whiton, writing in The National Interest, makes a similar point in an article that doesn’t give Biden much credit but does get the larger picture much better than Sanders does. “Biden officials have implied moral equivalence between the Israelis and Palestinians by only vaguely saying Israel has a right to defend itself and urging de-escalation rather than victory over the Islamist aggressors”, he writes. Again, that might be too harsh. With due respect to “officials,” when it comes to making policy on matters as sensitive as this one, the Oval Office is usually the only place that counts. Thus far, Biden has not demanded a de-escalation. The position the US will present at the meeting of the Security Council will give us a hint as to what the administration hopes to achieve in the region in the coming days.

As I wrote a few days ago, this is a test. Hamas is testing Biden – a test whose result will have huge impact on Hamas policies in the next four years. If the organization gets the impression that it can get away with murder, more violence is to be expected. If Hamas realizes that the international community (or at least the United States) will not be its savior if it chooses aggression, its leaders might decide to be more cautious. Note that two of the three main clashes between Israel and Hamas took place when President Obama was in power. Was he the reason for the escalation? Blaming Obama wouldn’t be fair. Was he a contributing factor? That’s more plausible. When the enemy knows that Israel could not unleash its full resources against the aggressor, this surely impacts its calculus as to whether war is advisable at a certain time.

Hamas is testing Biden – a test whose result will have huge impact on Hamas policies in the next four years. If the organization gets the impression that it can get away with murder, more violence is to be expected.

The violent inflammation caught Israel by surprise. It also caught the U.S. by surprise. The Biden administration had to develop its response to a crisis in haste, based on general principles, on experience and on sentiments. Biden and his team do not have much faith in Netanyahu. But they do have faith in some of his generals and his Defense Secretary, Benny Gantz. An American official hinted a few days ago that he was convinced by Israel’s security establishment that the eruption is not a political ploy by Netanyahu. Now, Israel’s security chiefs – the people the Americans trust – tell their counterparts that they still need more time. But diplomatic and political considerations trump military preferences not only in Israel – they also influence American policy makers, such as Biden. His military advisors agree with their Israeli colleagues. His diplomatic advisors emphasize the impatience of the international community and the Arab world. His political advisors warn that supporting Israel could cost him support within his own party. Biden is in a bind. As Israel and Hamas must face their greater dilemmas, he has to face his own, smaller dilemma, while the world, and especially Hamas, is watching.


Shmuel Rosner is an Israeli columnist, editor, and researcher. He is the editor of the research and data-journalism website themadad.com and is the political editor of the Jewish Journal.

If Biden Stops Israel Too Soon, Hamas Will Know it Can Get Away With Murder Read More »

Thank you to those who #StandWithIsrael

Los Angeles #StandWithIsrael Rally May 12, 2021 Photo by Jill Cutler

Israel is under attack.

Since May 10, 2021, Hamas and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (both recognized by the U.S. and EU as terrorist organizations) have launched over 3000 rockets at Israel’s civilian population centers. Millions of Israelis have had to run for shelter, and over 1500 Israeli civilians have been wounded. 10 Israelis have been murdered by Hamas, including 21 year old combat soldier Staff Sgt. Omer Tabib of the Nahal Brigade, and an adorable 6 year old boy named Ido, who loved Ninja Turtles. May their memories be for a blessing.

While the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) clearly must act to eliminate the sources of those attacks and protect our brothers and sisters, we sadly hear some voices calling for Israel to ‘exercise restraint.’ There is no justification for the indiscriminate rocket attack on innocent civilians. As any other sovereign state, Israel has the right and duty to defend its citizens.

Over the past several days, Pro Israel rallies have been held from coast-to-coast across the United States. The clear and unifying message of those rallies is that we #StandWithIsrael.

Roz Rothstein, co-founder and CEO StandWithUs, one of the co-sponsors of the pro-Israel rallies, stated, “People of the Middle East and around the world can contrast the success of the Abraham Accords and the warm relations now enjoyed between Gulf Arab States and Israel with the failures of Hamas and Palestinian Authority leaders to accept the Jewish State, normalize relations with it and make any credible moves towards peace. Instead, Hamas is attempting to escalate conflict, to perpetrate terror attacks and massacre Israelis. All leaders and people of goodwill should condemn Hamas and radical leaders who are an obstacle for a better future for all people in the region.” 

To learn more about the extraordinary work that StandWithUs is doing to support Israel and the Jewish people, please click here.

 

Our work is just beginning. We must diligently continue to advocate on behalf of Israel. It is imperative that our elected representatives and leaders continue to speak out publicly and condemn the attacks by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and support Israel’s right to defend itself.

IAC, which also co-sponsored the Pro Israel Coast to Coast rallies, stated: “We pray for the safety of Israel and of our friends and family serving in the IDF. And we thank you all once again for taking part in this important process of civic engagement with our public officials in support of our beloved Israel and her security.”

Thank you America for choosing to #StandWithIsrael.

Los Angeles #StandWithIsrael Rally May 12, 2021 Photo by Jill Cutler

StandWithUs Condemns Hamas for Attacks on Israeli Civilians

(Los Angeles – May 11, 2021) – Hamas has been inciting and organizing violent protests in Jerusalem for the last several weeks, the newest development in their ongoing terror campaign that has included setting fire to swathes of Israeli land, shooting 19-year old Israeli teenager Yehuda Guetta, to death and perpetrating several recent terror attacks. One senior Hamas leader, Fathi Hammad, was televised on May 7 inciting to murder, saying, “People of Jerusalem, we want you to cut off the heads of the Jews with knives. With your hand, cut their artery from here.”

Sadly, this is not new. For a century, long before the establishment of Israel, extremists from the Nazi collaborator, Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, have been promoting conspiracy theories about “the Jews” threatening to destroy the Al-Aqsa mosque. This weaponized rhetoric of “Al Aqsa is in danger” lie has been used repeatedly by Palestinian and Arab leaders to incite violence against Israelis and Jews in general. Inevitably people have died as a result. The truth is, of course, that only since Israel has overseen Jerusalem is there equal and free access to people of all backgrounds to pray at their respective holy sites.

Hamas, its allies and supporters – the Islamic Republic of Iran, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah – explicitly call for the destruction of the State of Israel and the subjugation of all its Jewish citizens. Those who support this agenda are partners in hate and are adversaries of peace.

Hamas’s heavy-fisted misrule of Gaza is a travesty of justice. Named by Forbes Magazine as the third richest terror group in the world, Hamas does not use its resources to build a peaceful future for their people by investing in civilian infrastructure. Instead Hamas has spent billions of dollars turning the Gaza Strip into a militarized armed camp. Hamas has built a network of sophisticated tunnels under Gaza and cross-border attack tunnels designed to send terror squads to kidnap and attack Israeli civilians. Hamas uses its millions on weapons factories and to purchase missiles from Iran, anti-tank weapons, assault rifles, mortars, grenades, anti-personnel mines and much more.

Many public officials, Democrats and Republicans alike, are standing up for Israel during this challenging time. We are grateful to all of them for their support. Please click here, via the #StandWithIsrael Israeli-American Coalition for Action list, to thank them for choosing to #StandWithIsrael.

We invite you to join us in thanking:
(Listed in alphabetical order)

Texas Governor Greg Abbott (R)
     “Texas will always stand with our friends in Israel. We pray that God will keep them safe and bring an end to this horrific violence.”

US Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (FL-R)
     “Israel has every right to defend itself, and I stand with #Israel. I am saddened by loss of life due to the cowardly acts of terrorists funded by the terrorist state of Iran.”
 
South Carolina State Rep. Beth Bernstein (D) – lead sponsor of South Carolina House Resolution H.4398, signed by almost all members of the South Carolina House:
     “Recognizing Israel’s Right to use Decisive Force in Defending Itself Against Attacks and to Reaffirm South Carolina’s Strong Support for Israel”

US Rep. Ted Deutch (FL-D)
     “Moral clarity. That’s what this moment calls for. Hamas is a terrorist organization. It uses children as shields & has fired 1,750+ rockets targeting civilians. America stands with our ally Israel & against the Hamas terrorists.”

US Rep. Neal Dunn (FL-R)
     “Israel is right to defend itself. Hamas is a terrorist org that is motivated by destruction & hate. Israel can’t stand by & watch their civilians be killed, nor should they be expected to.”

US Rep Lois Frankel (FL-D)
     “Israel has a right to defend itself. Hamas must end its attack.”

US Rep. Josh Gottheimer (NY-D)
     “Our commitment to Israel’s security and to its right to defend itself from terrorists is iron-clad… There should be no false equivalences or excuses made by anyone”

Maryland Governor Larry Hogan (R)
     “The State of Maryland stands with Israel as Hamas terrorists attack innocent civilians. We pray for all the victims of the bloodshed and that it will soon come to an end.”

TX State Senator Bryan Hughes (R)
     “We must stand with Israel.”

Sen. Mark Kelly (AZ-D)
     “Israel being our biggest partner in the Middle East and the only true democracy, we’ve got to make sure Israel has what it needs to defend itself.”

Texas State Rep. Phil King (R):
     “Texas supports Israel’s right to act decisively in self-defense to protect its citizens and end aggressions by the Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist organizations.”

US Rep Elaine Luria (VA-D)
     “Jews returned to their ancestral home… and today in their rightful homeland, they are attacked from within… Who would turn a cheek, when their mere right to exist is questioned? … Now is the time to stand with Israel.”

Iowa Governor Kim Reynolds (R)
     “Today I proclaimed May 13th, 2021 Peace in Israel Day. I encourage all Iowans to pray for peace and show our solidarity with the people of Israel during this difficult time for their nation.”

Letter by 44 US Senators: Marco Rubio, James Risch, James Inhofe, Pat Toomey, Todd Young, Tom Cotton, Charles Grassley, Thom Tillis, James Lankford, Steve Daines, John Barrasso, Ron Johnson, Rick Scott, Josh Hawley, M. Michael Rounds, Dan Sullivan, Cindy Hyde-Smith, Make Crapo, Roger Marshall, M.D., Marsha Blackburn, Mitt Romney, Mike Braun, Deb Fischer, Joni K. Ernst, Cynthia Lummis, Ben Sasse, John Thune, Tim Scott, Roger F. Wicker, John Boozman, Kevin Cramer, Bill Hagerty, Ted Cruz, John Hoeven, John Kennedy, Shelley Moore Capito, Michael S. Lee, Richard Burr, Bill Cassidy, M.D., Susan M. Collins, Tommy Tuberville, John Cornyn, Lisa Murkowski, Rob Portman,
     “Over the past couple days, Palestinian terrorists in Gaza, who are funded by Iran, have launched a series of rocket attacks into Israel. They are targeting Israeli civilians and cities, including Israel’s capital Jerusalem. … In light of these recent attacks by Hamas against Israel, the United States should take all steps necessary to hold Tehran accountable and under no circumstances, provide sanctions relief to Iran. This is especially important as Iran is supporting terrorist activity against the United States’ closest ally in the region, Israel.”
 
US Rep. Brad Sherman (CA-D)
     “Hamas has caused many Palestinian deaths, since one quarter of its rockets aimed at Israel actually explode in Gaza, and because Hamas locates its military operations in civilian neighborhoods, using human shields.”

US Rep. Norma Torres (CA-D)
     “I strongly condemn the rocket attacks by Hamas on Israel’s civilian population. There is no justification for terror attacks on civilians.”

Los Angeles #StandWithIsrael Rally May 12, 2021 Photo by Jill Cutler

 

Thank you to those who #StandWithIsrael Read More »