fbpx

October 16, 2017

Gov. Brown signs law imposing harsher sentences on violent use of social media

Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed a law on Wednesday that slaps harsher sentences on those who use social media as part of a violent crime.

The law, dubbed as “Jordan’s Law” in response to a teenager being violently attacked in 2016, would allow judges to weigh the use of a video recording that had “the intent to encourage or facilitate the offense as a factor in aggravation in sentencing that defendant,” according to the text of the law.

In other words, uploading a video of a violent attack to social media with the intent of aiding and abetting the crime is an added factor when it comes to sentencing.

Assemblyman Matt Dababneh (D-Woodland Hills) said in a statement, “The number of social media motivated attacks, which has included hundreds of vicious assaults on children, the elderly, and the disabled, has risen sharply each year since the mid-2000s. We need to ensure that our criminal code keeps pace with technology, and AB 1542, by maximizing the sentence for those who conspire with attackers to videotape a violent crime, will serve as a strong message to our youth that California will not tolerate this sick desire for internet notoriety.”

In December, 14-year-old Jordan Peisner was sucker punched outside of a Wendy’s in West Hills by a 15-year-old boy who was reportedly paid by a girl to do so. Another girl recorded a video of the attack and uploaded it to Snapchat, which was the alleged motivation behind the attack. The boy received what Jordan’s father, Ed Peisner, thought was a light punishment while the girls have yet to face any sort of legal punishment.

Jordan suffered a fractured skull and brain bleeding from the sucker punch and has since suffered from “seizures, headaches and hearing loss,” according to CBS Los Angeles.

Ed Peisner told the Journal that the law was a step in the right direction.

“I’m hoping that this will serve as a pause button,” said Peisner. “Before you grab that phone and you’re about to do something that could get you in trouble, stop for a minute. Wait. Think about it. So it’s adding some accountability.”

Peisner added that social media has “no rules” and thought that schools should teach proper social media etiquette.

“We need to now adapt the way we think and what we do at schools and at home and apply it towards the digital world because they live in the digital world now,” said Peisner, “and we need some guidance there.”

Peisner said he hoped that Jordan’s Law would go national, thus fulfilling the goal of “changing the future… one child at a time.”

 

Gov. Brown signs law imposing harsher sentences on violent use of social media Read More »

American Israeli Medical Association Event Provides Current Status of Israeli Medicine, Startups

The American Israeli Medical Association (AIMA) held its 10th annual BioMedTech summit on Sunday, focusing on the current state of Israeli medicine and startups and what the medical field will look like in 2030.

The event kicked off with Eitan Weiss, the deputy consul general of Israel in Los Angeles, briefly stating that it was “vital and important” that the United States and Israel maintain good ties in the field of medicine and told those in the field to “keep up the good work.” Later on, Ben Drillings, the director of AIMA, provided some statistics about the Israeli medical field, most notably that Israeli biomedical companies received $4.8 billion in investment in 2016, an 11% increase from the year prior.

Additionally, Drillings noted that there were a total of 568 Israeli biomed companies and 1,350 active life science companies, half of which focused research and development. Israel also has the highest PhDs per capita worldwide.

Dr. Zeev Feldman, chairman of the Israel Medical Association (IMA) World Fellowship, followed Drillings with a presentation predicting the state of Israeli health care and medicine in 2030. Feldman highlighted predictions from a Futurology podcast that 80% of all doctor’s visits would be replaced by automated tests and that 90% of restaurants would use 3-D printers for food, and then proceeded to give a rundown of what Israeli medicine and health care would look like.

Feldman predicted that fragmentation and specialization would continue in the field, as he believes that new specialties will be established and existing ones would be expanded. He also expected technological advancements in the industry to continue, although he pointed out that it’s difficult to obtain the funding for such technology. Feldman predicted that by 2030, most surgeries would rely on wireless energy, people can obtain “hyper-individual medicines” and pharmaceuticals will be nonexistent.

However, Feldman noted that Israel will soon face a shortage in the health care industry as a result of “retirements.” He also provided statistics showing that Israel is fourth worldwide in life expectancy and spends 7.4% of its GDP on health care, which he said was “extremely low.”

Orthopedic surgeon Tzaki Siev-Ner of the IMA World Fellowship followed Feldman by discussing how the Israeli army provides medical aid to those in dire need of it in other countries.

“It is our moral mission to help and support other countries,” said Siev-Ner.

For example, when Haiti experienced a devastating earthquake in 2010 the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) sent field hospital staff members to Haiti in 72 hours, where they treated over 4,000 patients and performed 215 operations in a span of two weeks.

Siev-Ner also pointed out that in 2013, Israel provided care to seven Syrians at the border harmed by the civil war that has ravaged the country since 2011. Israel even ensured that the medical documentation they provided to the Syrians they treated had zero indication that they were treated by Israelis.

The orthopedic surgeon noted that in the moral dilemma on whether to provide medical care to the enemy, “We always remember that the physicians are the neutral attorney of the poor.”

The final keynote speaker was Jon Medved, the CEO of OurCrowd. Medved focused on the thriving startup culture in Israel, stating that it was “second only to Silicon Valley” in that regard. He also pointed out that $5 billion has been invested in Israeli startups and Israeli venture investment has soared by 150% since 2013.

“Israel is one of the top four countries in the world with companies trading in New York,” said Medved, noting that Israel was only behind the U.S., Canada and China. “It’s absurd! Eight million people and we’re doing this? It doesn’t make any sense.”

Medved also stated that “the whole world is being disrupted by innovation,” which is forcing multinational corporations to go to Israel to become more innovative.

OurCrowd, Medved’s company, helps raise money for startups, and some of those companies included ReWalk Robotics, which provides the technology necessary to help paraplegics walk and stand and MedAware, a company that cracks down on prescription errors by utilizing Big Data.

 

 

 

 

American Israeli Medical Association Event Provides Current Status of Israeli Medicine, Startups Read More »

Episode 60 – Let’s Talk Bibi

It can be safely said that Benjamin Netanyahu is one of the most controversial figures in Israeli politics. He’s seen by many as the savior of the Jewish people while many others consider him the antithesis to everything democratic and Israeli. He’s worshiped, he’s cursed. He’s praised and he’s ridiculed. One thing is for sure, no one is indifferent to Bibi.

It’s only fitting that such a leader would be embroiled in corruption charges for most of his political career. Most recently, the cases nicknamed cases 1000 through 4000 have intermittently surfaced in the headlines here in Israel and around the world. Cigars and champagne, German submarines, secret deals for favorable coverage, conflicts of interest, conflicts of interest, conflicts of interest.

However, Netanyahu is also held up as one of the great leaders of our time. He’s hailed for taking a hardline against some of Israel’s staunchest critics and most hostile enemies. His international diplomacy is unrivaled in the Israeli political sphere. His free market capitalism and the policies he set in motion during his tenure as Finance Minister are credited by many with restoring Israel’s economy after the Second Intifada.

So it’s about time: we need to talk about Bibi.

Lahav Harkov is the Senior Knesset Reporter and Analyst for The Jerusalem Post. She’s often invited to lecture on Israeli Government and Politics in Israel and abroad. The BBC, France 24, Sky News and many others have sought her insights about breaking news. She’s published articles in CommentaryThe New York PostTablet and Makor Rishon, just to name a few. And she was recently recognized by the JTA as the 5th-most influential person on “Jewish Twitter.”

Lahav Harkov joins us today to help tackle the man that is Bibi… not literally.

Lahav’s Twitter and FB

(Photo credit: the Kremlin)

RSS Subscribe

Episode 60 – Let’s Talk Bibi Read More »

MARSHALL *Movie Review*

“Marshall” has all the makings of a fantastic biopic: a venerable subject matter, impressive actors, and an Oscar-nominated director in Reginald Hudlin (“Django Unchained”).  While this film is undoubtedly an Oscar-contender, it turns out that it’s not so much a biopic after all. Despite former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall’s remarkable record winning 29 of 32 cases before the Supreme Court as a private attorney, he doesn’t even argue the central case in this film.

Why would Hudlin appear turn away from the story of civil rights leader Marshall in favor of white, Jewish attorney Sam Friedman?  It seems this isn’t the well-known story of Marshall-the-attorney, but one that explores a lesser-known side of him.  Here, Thurgood Marshall (Chadwick Boseman) shines as a brilliant recruiter and motivator.

In “Marshall“, Thurgood travels to Connecticut on behalf of the NAACP to defend Joseph Spell (Sterling K Brown) on a rape charge.  As he’s not a licensed attorney in the state, Marshall needs one to appear in court on his behalf, presenting a motion allowing him to argue there.  Sam Friedman (Josh Gad) reluctantly agrees, insisting that he’s through with the case afterwards.  The judge won’t allow Friedman to step down and forbids Marshall from speaking, effectively muzzling him in favor of an attorney who has never even tried a criminal case.

The surprise ruling means Marshall must motivate Friedman to defend their client, while teaching him the intricacies of criminal law.  Friedman becomes part of a movement he never intended to champion.  In fact, the film’s post script says he spent the rest of his life working as a civil rights advocate following this experience.

The real-life Friedman undoubtedly saw the parallels between what he faced as a Jewish attorney and the plight of his African-American client, a point that’s emphasized through repeated scenes in which both suffer from racism and stereotypes.  The director ensures this connection is clear, with Marshall telling Friedman he’s “one of us”.

For more about “Marshall”, including some interesting stylistic choices, take a look below:

–>Keep in touch with the author on Twitter and Instagram @realZoeHewitt.  Looking for the direct link to the video?  Click here.

All film photos are courtesy of Open Road Films.

MARSHALL *Movie Review* Read More »

The American Jewish Historical Society caved under pressure. Good or Bad?

Consider the two following headlines:

Caving To Pressure, Jewish Group Cancels Play By Critic Of Israel

Two anti-Israel programs canceled at CJH and AJHS

The first headline is from the left-leaning Jewish Forward. The second headline is from the right-leaning Arutz Sheva. Both headlines are accurate. The issue here is not one of accuracy — it is one of viewpoint. The American Jewish Historical Society has canceled a play that is probably anti-Israel, and it canceled a panel sponsored by a group that is also anti-Israel. The American Jewish Historical Society caved under pressure. The question is: does one mourn such an occurrence, or does one celebrate it? Does one see this occurrence as a defeat (for freedom) or as a victory (for Jewish sanity)?

These events were not canceled in a vacuum — another reason for consternation or glee. They were canceled amid harsh criticism from right-wing groups over the appointment of a new executive director for the Center for Jewish History. David Myers is seen by these groups as unfit for the job because of his involvement with groups such as the New Israel Fund and because of his past criticisms of Israel.

The appointment of Myers prompted a debate between two factions with strong views and little tolerance for the worldview of the other side. Myers was smeared by his opponents as if he were the worst possible choice for any job — as if he were the worst enemy of the Jewish people. Myers was defended by his supporters as if his appointment were the ultimate test of the Jewish people — do or die. A simple question was often lost in the debate: Are Myers’ views on Israel relevant to the position he will be holding? Lost in this debate was another simple question: Would Myers, as head of such an organization, accept the need for him to refrain from activities and statements that would make him and his institution impossibly controversial? (His answers to both of these questions seems reasonably reassuring.)

The two canceled events came at the worst time for Myers and his organization, and the board of directors was wise to cancel them. Yes, it was caving under pressure. But caving under pressure is not always bad. The pressure came for a reason, and this reason is that many Jews — admittedly, myself included — are uncomfortable with mainstream Jewish institutions becoming a fashionable hub for anti-Israel propaganda. In fact, I see no reason for the Center for Jewish History to be a hub for any propaganda, except for propaganda whose aim is preserving the traditions and vitality of the Jewish people.

Freedom of expression is not the question here. The Center for Jewish History is under no obligation to be the home for plays and panels of the canceled type. It is under obligation to be — or at least to try to be — a place with which as many Jews as possible feel comfortable. And yes, this means a little less edginess, a little less controversy. It means putting more effort at becoming a place for Jews to unite, and not yet another place for them to bicker over Israel or other issues.

Can consensus be fashionable? Maybe the Center for Jewish History can conduct itself in a way that makes it fashionable. Maybe David Myers can conduct himself in a way that makes it fashionable. That would be a great contribution to the Jewish people.

 

 

The American Jewish Historical Society caved under pressure. Good or Bad? Read More »