fbpx

January 22, 2017

Rabbi Sharon Brous speaks at Women’s March D.C.

The nation we love is in crisis, and it is not only a political crisis. It is a moral crisis. A SOUL crisis.

But we know how to navigate troubled terrain.

Thousands of years ago, the Hebrew people were brutally enslaved in Egypt. The story of their redemption from bondage has planted in our collective consciousness the deepest human truth: that though we suffer, the trajectory of history moves from slavery to freedom, darkness to light, narrowness to expansiveness.

We all remember Moses standing before Pharaoh proclaiming, “Let my people go.” But the quiet heroes of that liberation movement were two women, Shifra and Puah, midwives ordered by Pharaoh to take the lives of the firstborn male Hebrew children.

What Pharaoh did not know was that Shifra and Puah feared no man, they feared only the Holy One. So they risked their lives to resist the Empire and defy the evil decree.

Many believe Shifra and Puah were Hebrew women, rising up against an existential threat to their people. But others claim they were Egyptian, which made their decision to protect the Hebrews even more heroic. They entered the fray for their sisters because they understood they were a part of what Dr. King would later call an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny.

Like Egypt, our country dwells today in narrow straits.

But we are not powerless. Those midwives armed us with a blueprint for spiritual resistance: the marriage of radical empathy and moral action.

Sometimes—maybe once in a generation—a spirit of resistance is awakened at the intersection of love, faith and holy outrage. In those moments, we are reminded what we’re fighting for, what our armed forces are willing to die for, what this country was built for and what our flag flies for: liberty and justice, for all.

This is one of those sacred moments. Today, around the country, we, the people, stand together in protest, proclaiming our fidelity to love over hate, progress over regress, and inclusion over exclusion.

Today, spiritual resistance is Black, Latino and white folks fighting—together—the systemic racism that is the legacy of slavery and Jim Crow, and working—together—to welcome immigrants and refugees to our country with dignity and compassion, for we, too, were strangers.

It is Jews and Muslims, Christians, Catholics, Sikhs—people of all faiths and none—standing together to reject a Muslim registry, to reject all forms of Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, and any other discrimination against a religious minority.

Spiritual resistance is white women and women of color, gay, trans and heterosexual women and MEN of all stripes rejecting the political machinations that would turn us against each other, instead affirming our fundamental interconnectedness.

Because you see, our soul crisis is rooted in a cynical politics that pits vulnerable populations against each other. But spiritual resistance reawakens us to our shared humanity. One nation, indivisible.

Our children will one day ask us: where were you when our country was thrust into a lion’s den of demagoguery and division? We will say: I stood with love. I stood with hope. I stood with sisters and brothers of all religions and races and genders and sexualities to insist that we will emerge from the darkness and bask in the brilliance of an America that honors the infinite worth of all of God’s children.

This is an America that believes that all people deserve to live free from demonization, disenfranchisement, and denigration, that white supremacy and misogyny have no place in our diverse nation, that all people deserve affordable health care and a living wage, that our economic anxiety need not turn us against one another, but can, instead, help us understand one another.

This is an America that is sustained—not threatened—by its diversity.

This is an America fueled by hope, the greatest act of defiance against a politics of pessimism and culture of despair.

Our nation was built on lofty ideals of justice and equality—ideals that our founders themselves failed to realize, but which nevertheless perpetually lift our gaze toward the promise of a better America.

The only way we’ll realize those ideals and heal from our soul-sickness is TOGETHER. As the great civil rights leader Fannie Lou Hamer said: “You don’t have to like everybody, but you have to love everybody.” Lift up the hand of someone to your left and to your right. We are the vast and varied manifestations of hope and love and spiritual defiance that will hold our nation to its greatest aspirations. We are the agents of change.

Together, we will stand against the moral bankruptcy that threatens our democracy.

Together, we will reclaim truth and lift our voices for justice and mercy.

Together, we will become midwives of a new era in America.

Shabbat shalom—may this holy day bring peace to all of us, and peace to our beloved country.


Sharon Brous is founder and senior rabbi at IKAR Los Angeles.

Rabbi Sharon Brous speaks at Women’s March D.C. Read More »

Sunday Reads: Trump’s controversial inaugural address, The winners and losers of 2016

US

Michael Gerson writes about Trump’s combative inaugural address, which he calls “the death of Reaganism”:

Trump’s inaugural was instructive in this way: America has chosen a man for whom traditions and norms mean nothing (less than nothing when he finds them constraining). He used the center stage of American public life to belittle nearly everyone seated around him. They have “reaped the rewards of government,” prospered at the expense of the people, celebrated while families struggled, and are “all talk and no action.”

Walter Russell Mead compiles an interesting list of the winners and losers of 2016, and he begins it with Andrew Jackson:

The biggest winner of 2016 has been dead for 171 years. Old Hickory’s legacy of American populism is one of the most powerful forces in national politics. When properly harnessed, it wins wars by facing down America’s enemies with unrelenting ruthlessness. Jacksonian populists are threat-motivated at home too, and in 2016 they Donald Trump to victory on the back of anger about immigration, economic competition with Mexico and China, and Islamism. The establishments of both major political parties were caught completely off-guard.

Israel

Yair Rosenberg praises outgoing US Ambassador Dan Shapiro, who had quite a difficult job:

Throughout all this, Shapiro was perhaps the only person who retained the trust of both President Obama and Prime Minister Netanyahu, an international diplomatic feat in its own right. Even as Israel and the United States butted heads, sometimes explosively, Shapiro managed to safeguard the relationship, put out fires, and keep lines of communication open.

Amos Yadlin believes that Trump is an opportunity for Israel to influence US policy on Iran:

With the arrival of the new administration, Israel has been given a second chance to influence the US policy towards the Iranian nuclear program: an opportunity for joint action against Iran and advancing a parallel agreement, an Israeli-American one, aimed at changing the strategic reality without violating the agreement.

Middle East

According to Mustafa Saadoun, Egypt is considering joining Iran in the axis of resistance in the Middle East:

If Egypt joins the Axis of Resistance, whose stances in the Middle East are well known, it will make the axis stronger, as Egypt will be joining another key Arab state in the alliance — Iraq.

Iran’s influence on Egypt and Iraq will strengthen Iran's position facing Saudi Arabia, which has lost Egypt as an important ally in the region. This might stir new conflicts in some Arab states, specifically Egypt, which is likely to be the new stage of terrorist operations.

David Pollok points out that the US has a real opportunity to improve the situation in Syria next week:

In the week after his inauguration, President Trump will have an unusual opportunity to put his new diplomatic designs to the test in, of all places, Astana, the remote capital of Kazakhstan. If this sounds like a Borat joke, it isn't. Astana is where Russia is convening a deadly serious new round of Syrian peace talks, to which it ostentatiously invited the incoming administration.

Jewish World

Irwin Cotler writes about Raoul Wallenberg, hero of humanity, 42 years after his mysterious disappearance:

Wallenberg was a beacon of light during the darkest days of the Holocaust, and his example remains so today. Prior to his arrival in Budapest in July 1944, some 430,000 Hungarian Jews had been deported to Auschwitz in the space of 10 weeks – the fastest, cruelest and most efficient mass murder of the Nazi genocide. Yet Wallenberg rescued some 100,000 Jews in six months in Hungary in 1944, demonstrating that one person with the courage to care, and the commitment to act, can confront evil and transform history.

J.J. Goldberg found some quiet, elegant Jewish dissent in Chuck Schumer and Marvin Hier’s words at the inaugural:

At times, looking for the Jewish angle in a major public event can feel small, parochial and petty. Not this time. The contrast between the two Jews on the podium, Senator Chuck Schumer and Rabbi Marvin Hier, and everyone else who spoke was quite striking.

Sunday Reads: Trump’s controversial inaugural address, The winners and losers of 2016 Read More »

Plasco Building disaster rekindles painful memories for L.A.’s Iranian Jews

For many Iranian American Jews, the fire and collapse of the historic Plasco Building in Tehran a few days ago was a tragedy for the community on so many levels.  The heartbreak comes not only from the loss of 75 innocent lives who tried to fight the fire or were trapped in the building, but the building’s demise rekindled the painful memories of the unjust execution of Habib Elghanayan, the Jewish community leader who originally built the structure. The Plasco Building was one of the remaining symbols of the Jewish community’s height of success in Iran during their modern “golden age”.  Not to acknowledge the Elghanayan family’s role in this building’s creation and not to acknowledge the tragedy that befell Habib Elghanayan at the hands of the Iranian regime is also a travesty.

Media news outlets worldwide have not extensively acknowledged the very important role of the Elghanayan family in the Plasco Building’s creation or only briefly mentioned Habib Elghanayan’s name in passing. Elghanayan and his brothers were perhaps among the most affluent and successful Jewish businessmen in Iran prior to the 1979 Iranian revolution. They not only imported an array of goods from the West into the Iranian market and expanded infrastructure, but they brought new technologies to Iran that helped the country manufacture its own goods and as a resulted helped employ thousands of Iranians in their businesses. With their success, the Elghanayan family was equally generous in giving back to countless needy causes in Iran, both Jewish and non-Jewish.

In recent days I’ve interviewed a number of Los Angeles area Iranian Jews who had both fond and painful memories of the Plasco building. They offered a unique history and perspective on the building and on the execution of its developer Habib Elghanayan. The Plasco building completed in 1962 and standing at 17 stories was iconic because it was the first privately built “high rise” of the modern era created in Iran. It was also the first modern “mall” of that early era in Iran filled with floors that were home to many new stores for various unique goods and services. The Plasco building was not only elegant and modern in design and structure for its time, but it was a huge departure from the ancient slum-like “bazaars” of Iran’s past where people typically went to buy their goods. At a time when Iran was beginning to modernize, the building was not only a symbol of the country’s positive transformation, but it was also a powerful symbol of immense achievement of Iranian Jews. It was likewise a symbol of great pride for Iranian Jews who just four decades prior had been forced by the Qajar kings of Iran to live in poverty and in run-down ghettos. Frank Nikbakht, an Iranian Jewish activist living in Los Angeles, recently said to me “Jews were proud of course, that a Jewish person had built this iconic building, but many elders in the community were apprehensive about its implications and the much expected backlash by Muslims, envious of Jewish accomplishments”. The Jewish community leaders in Iran’s worry about the Plasco building’s backlash was real because according to Shahrzad Elghanayan (Habib’s granddaughter), Iranian Shiite cleric Mahmoud Taleghani objected to the idea that a Jew had built the tallest building of its time in Iran. No doubt Taleghani, Khomeini and other Shiite clerics were furious at the Pahlavi kings who had created an environment of co-existence and tolerance among Muslims and non-Muslims in Iran. The late Shah of Iran and his father had  essentially set aside the old Islamic Shariah laws which were designed to impose or ensure superiority of Muslims over Jews or other “infidels”. The Plasco Building built and owned by a Jew was a direct slap in the face to that radical Islamic dogma at that time because the notion of a Jewish building being taller in size than Muslim owned buildings was a totally unacceptable notion for the fanatic Iranian religious clerics! In fact, Nikbakht also shared an incident of anti-Semitism he encountered as a child relating to the Plasco Building while he was in close proximity to it with his parents on one outing…

“One evening, perhaps in 1964, as we were leaving the smelly fish market on Istanbul Avenue, my father had to drag us through a huge mass of jubilant people, towards a few taxis stopped in the middle of the street, a distance away. I could see between the bodies of tall adults that there was a great fire across the street. Some people were dancing and snapping their fingers as they chanted in an Iranian street rhythm; ‘Elghanian is burning!’ Even as a child, I couldn’t believe how anyone could be happy about a building on fire! We finally reached a taxi and my father pushed us inside, trying to get us out of there as soon as possible, but there was no driver inside. The driver was standing next to the taxi, watching the fire as my father tried to get him inside and have him drive us away. ‘What’s the hurry?’ The driver asked, let us watch the building of the dirty Jews burn’, using the highly derogatory term for Jews of “Johood”. At that moment, my father motioned us to be silent, as we witnessed our first true episode of deadly hatred of Tehran’s average citizens, towards ourselves, our first lesson about anti-Semitism. It turned out however, that the building on fire was the smaller building next to the Elghanian building, housing the old Tehran Cinema”.

 

(Inside the iconic Plasco Building prior to the January 18th fire that destroyed it).

In my humble opinion the heart and soul of the Plasco Building died when its original developer Habib Elghanayan was executed in 1979 by the Iranian regime for no reason than to strike fear in the hearts of Iran’s Jews and to help spark their mass exodus out of the country. On May 9, 1979, Elghanayan was executed by a firing squad of the Iranian revolutionary guard after being accused of trumped up charges of spying for Israel and America. Elghanayan was first given a 20 minute sham trial in front of the Iranian revolution court and TV cameras, but never given an attorney, nor any chance to defend himself from the baseless charges. When Elghanayan was executed, the news spread like wild fire among Iran’s 80,000 strong Jewish community and sparked the first massive wave of Jews fleeing the country. On that disastrous day, the lives of Iran’s Jews were forever transformed for the worse. It was then that they realized when their beloved community leader could be so easily executed with no real evidence, then they too were no longer safe in a country where they had lived for nearly 3,000 years.

 

(Iranian Jewish leader Habib Elghanayan)

In 2009, on the 30th anniversary of his execution, I had the unique opportunity to interview Elghanayan family members, Iranian Jewish leaders and Iranian Muslims who all knew Habib Elghanayan closely to recall their memories of his imprisonment and execution. One of the most revealing interviews I had was with Sion Elghanayan, Habib Elghanayan’s brother who told me that Habib had left Iran during the initial chaos of the revolution but then returned back to Iran because of his patriotism for Iran and commitment to Iran’s Jews as their leader. “We all begged him not to go back to Iran— including then Israeli Prime Minister Begin because we all knew the new regime would execute him if he returned,” said Sion Elghanayan. “He said, I have done nothing wrong for them to execute me. I’ve created jobs and businesses to help the country grow and helped many Iranians of all faiths. Why should they kill me?”. Unfortunately the regime’s thugs arrested Habib Elghanayan and after a sham trial he was executed. Likewise, Sion shared the fact that his family had made plans to bribe prison officials to help Habib escape the prison and country but that Habib refused to go along with the plans. “He told us he would not go along with the plan to escape because if he did, the Iranian regime would take revenge by executing Jews in Iran. In this way he sacrificed his life for the community”.

Another revealing interview came from an Iranian Muslim businessman by the name of Nasser Oliae who was a long time Elghanayan friend and had nothing but praise for him. “One day they must create a giant statute of Habib Elghanayan in the middle of Tehran for all of the great things he did for that country! He brought the plastics manufacturing industry to Iran, he hired thousands of people, he gave generously to thousands of Iranians of all religions who were needy. He was a man who truly loved Iran and wanted to see the country’s success” said Oliae.

Habib Elghanayan was an innocent Jew who was executed for no reason by the evil Iranian regime and that regime still today has not apologized to Iranian Jewry for this great crime they committed! For this reason it is very difficult for Iranian Jews living outside of Iran to forget Habib Elghanayan and his remarkable life’s achievements not only for the nation of Iran, but for his own Jewish community.

On a side note, Elghanayan family members recently informed me that the Plasco Building was sold by them in 1975 to Hojabr Yazdani, an affluent Iranian Baha’i businessman. Following the revolution, the Iranian regime’s official “non-profit” organization named “Bonyad-e Mostaz-afaan” confiscated the Plasco Building from Yazdani in 1979 and has been operating it since then. The “Bonyad-e Mostaz-afaan” which translates to the “organization for the oppressed people” was a front group established by the Iranian regime’s ayatollahs after the 1979 revolution to expropriate the assets of any person whom they believed were “infidels” in order to allegedly “re-distribute” it to the poor or needy in Iran. Unfortunately for Iran’s poor, the “Bonyad-e Mostaz-afaan” has in the last 38 years never given a penny to them but instead the money and assets this group has confiscated over the years from Jews, Muslims, Christians, Bahais have all gone into the pockets of the ruling Iranian ayatollahs. All of the Elghanayan family assets and properties were also confiscated by the “Bonyad-e Mostaz-afaan” as well. What is truly unfortunate about the recent Plasco Building fire was the fact that since it was owned by the Iranian regime, no one will be brought to justice for the failure to upkeep the building and prevent the fire hazards that brought it down! We will never know what caused the fire or explosion that destroyed this iconic building in Tehran and sadly the ayatollahs who profited from the building for the last 38 years will never be held accountable for their fire code violations that caused the loss of so many innocent lives in this disaster.

In the end, the Plasco Building fire disaster not only caused the death of many individuals but it was a loss of one of the remaining symbols of Jewish contributions to Iran during the 20th century. The building was also a symbol of the bygone era of modernity and new development that an Iranian Jew by the name of Habib Elghanayan and his brothers had brought to Iran. Today we cannot forget the calamity that befell Habib Elghanayan at the hands of the current Iranian regime, nor can we forget the tremendous contributions thousands of Iranian Jews made to the betterment of the nation of Iran during the 20th century.

(Habib Elghanayan’s grave in Tehran’s Jewish cemetary today)

Plasco Building disaster rekindles painful memories for L.A.’s Iranian Jews Read More »

The women who could not march

When I saw images of more than 1 million women marching across America on Saturday with signs like “Strong men respect women,” “Strong women scare weak men” and “American horror story White House,” I was proud to live in a country where the freedom to protest and dissent is so vibrant.

But I couldn’t help wondering whether Kajal Khdir was watching the same images.

Kajal, as reported by Amnesty International (AI), was accused of adultery by her husband’s family and held hostage by six family members in Iraqi Kurdistan. She was “tortured and mutilated; family members cut off part of her nose and told her she would be killed after the birth of her child. After fleeing to Syria, two of her abusers were arrested. However, they were both released within twenty-four hours because authorities determined they had acted to safeguard the honor of the family. No charges were ever brought against them.”

I also wondered about Bhanwari Devi, who was raped by five men of a higher caste in India. As AI reports, “The gender-specific sexual abuse that she suffered was compounded by discrimination based on her social status. In the acquittal of her attackers two years later, the court noted that the incident could not possibly have happened because upper caste men would not rape a woman of a lower caste.”

When I saw American women march in unison against the new administration, I also wondered about Hannah Koroma from Sierra Leone, who was genitally mutilated against her will at the age of ten as a rite of passage. As reported by AI, “the ritual was performed with a blunt penknife and Hanna Koroma was denied any anesthetic or antibiotics during or after the procedure. When the operation left her hemorrhaged and anemic, her community attributed her pain to witchcraft.”

These are hardly isolated incidents. In many parts of the world, gratuitous violence against women is an ongoing epidemic. As AI reports, “Because of persistent discrimination against women and women’s virtual invisibility, these human rights violations continue with no clear sign of abatement.”

Let’s put aside the obvious point that it would be absurd to compare human rights in America with human rights in the Third World. Notwithstanding that it’s still far from certain whether the new Trump administration will, in fact, be able to implement new laws that will curtail human rights in our country, let’s grant that the women and others who marched yesterday, which included many friends, had genuine reasons to be outraged at the new administration.

My point is this: If progressives are so into global solidarity, what about other women and minorities around the world who have been suffering long before Donald Trump ever showed up? What about all the Kajal Khdirs, Bhanwari Devis and Hannah Koromas of the world whose voices for so long have been screaming with silence? Where are the signs to defend their rights?

One of the beefs against the new administration is this tribal notion of putting “America First,” which President Trump expressed quite clearly in his inaugural address. This is an insular worldview that violates the great liberal principle of solidarity between all peoples. The best rebuttal to Trump’s tribal view, then, would be to organize demonstrations that say, “Humanity First.”

I have no problem with women and minorities marching in America and fighting for their rights. I love that freedom. I just wish that, one day, they will also march in Washington and at the United Nations and hold up signs for Kajal, Bhanwari and Hannah.

Why? Because we can and they can’t.

The women who could not march Read More »

Report: Los Angeles measles outbreak centers on Orthodox Jewish community

A measles outbreak in Los Angeles County, California, is centered on the Orthodox Jewish community, according to reports.

Some 20 people have been infected in the outbreak, with 18 in LA County, 15 of whom, according to the LA County Department of Public Health “either knew one another or had a clear social connection, ” the Los Angeles Times reported over the weekend.

None of the 18 people could show proof of vaccination, according to the health department’s interim health officer Dr. Jeffrey Gunzenhauser. Most of those infected were in their 20s but the infected also included young children and older adults, according to the newspaper.

The outbreak comes six months after California passed a strict vaccine law, making vaccines mandatory beginning in first grade.

Rabbi Hershy Z. Ten, president of the Los Angeles Bikur Cholim organization, said in a column written for Jewish Home LA that at the end of December he had received a call from Dr. Franklin Pratt, medical director for the Los Angeles Department of Public Health Immunization Program, “who advised that just days prior, a measles outbreak was identified in the Los Angeles Orthodox Jewish community linked through epidemiology, social interaction, and geography.  He asked that Bikur Cholim urgently readdress and write about this issue in order to reach as many Jewish communities as quickly as possible.”

Gunzenhauser said county health workers interviewed each infected person to find out everywhere they went during the four days before and after they developed the rash associated with measles.

The county workers ultimately identified more than 2,000 people who may have come into contact with a measles patient, and discovered that about 10 percent  of them had not been vaccinated.

“Regardless of what or when any regulations were implemented or any parents’ personal belief, no child should be allowed to remain at school or enter a play-group, whether at a home or synagogue, without proof that they’ve been immunized,” Ten wrote.

In 2015, a wave of pertussis, or “whooping cough,” appeared in the haredi Orthodox communities of Williamsburg and Borough Park, Brooklyn.

Report: Los Angeles measles outbreak centers on Orthodox Jewish community Read More »

Trump: Phone call with Netanyahu ‘very nice’

U.S. President Donald Trump said a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was “very nice.”

The leaders spoke early Sunday afternoon eastern standard time.

Trump made his comment on the phone call later Sunday afternoon, when asked by reporters following a White House swearing-in ceremony for some Trump administration advisers.

A statement released from the Prime Minister’s Office described the interaction as a “very warm conversation,” and said the leaders discussed “the nuclear deal with Iran, the peace process with the Palestinians and other issues.”

Netanyahu said earlier in the day when asked what subjects the leaders would talk about: “There are many issues between us including the Israeli-Palestinian issue, the situation in Syria and the Iranian threat.”

“The Prime Minister expressed his desire to work closely with President Trump to forge a common vision to advance peace in the region, with no daylight between the United States and Israel,” the statement said.

Trump invited Netanyahu to come to Washington in February to meet with him, according to the statement.

Prior to the phone conversation, Netanyahu reportedly told his Security Cabinet that he would lift restrictions on building in eastern Jerusalem, and that he would soon announce West Bank settlement bloc expansion, the Times of Israel reported.

Also on Sunday, Israeli government ministers postponed a vote on annexing the large West Banks settlement of Maaleh Adumim, after agreeing to wait to decide on the issue until after Netanyahu and Trump meet.

The Ministerial Committee for Legislation on Sunday agreed to wait to vote on the proposed bill, which would subject the settlement to Israeli law, thereby annexing it.

The international community and the Palestinians argue that making Maaleh Adumim an official part of Israel will prevent the formation of a Palestinian state since it would prevent territorial contiguity.

Netanyahu on Friday called on Education Minister Naftali Bennett, head of the right-wing Jewish Home Party, to postpone discussion on the bill, saying Trump’s advisors had asked him to hold off, and  asked that there be no unilateral steps taken by Israel prior to a Trump-Netanyahu meeting.

Trump: Phone call with Netanyahu ‘very nice’ Read More »

White House: Trump administration in ‘beginning stages’ of discussing embassy move

The Trump administration is in the “beginning stages” of discussing whether to move the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

“We are at the very beginning stages of even discussing this subject,” White House press secretary Sean Spicer said on Sunday in a statement, according to Reuters.

The statement came hours before President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu were scheduled to have a phone conversation.

Spicer said in a briefing call with reporters at the end of last week that an announcement on the embassy move would be “coming soon.”

Trump told an Israeli reporter on Tuesday in Washington that he will move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. Israel Hayom reporter Boaz Bismuth reported that during a conversation with Trump, he asked the president elect if he remembered telling him in a previous interview that he would move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem and recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

He reported that Trump replied: “Of course I remember what I told you about Jerusalem. Of course I didn’t forget. And you know I’m not a person who breaks promises.”

Kellyanne Conway, a top Trump adviser, told conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt during a show in December that moving the embassy was a “big priority” for Trump.

“It is something that our friend in Israel, a great friend in the Middle East, would appreciate and something that a lot of Jewish Americans have expressed their preference for,” Conway said. “It is a great move. It is an easy move to do based on how much he talked about that in the debates and in the sound bites.”

The nominee for U.S. Ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, has reportedly said in private conversations that he will “work and live in Jerusalem,” Ynet reported. The official ambassador’s residence is located in Herzliya. Friedman owns an apartment in the Talbiyeh neighborhood of Jerusalem, which he reportedly visits several times a year.

Friedman is expected to arrive in Israel at the end of February and take up his job as ambassador. He has not yet been confirmed by the Senate.

Congress recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital in 1995, and at that time passed a law mandating the move that included a presidential waiver that lapses every six months, that allows the president to delay the move for national security reasons.

White House: Trump administration in ‘beginning stages’ of discussing embassy move Read More »

Are You America?

The last time I wrote something for the Jewish Journal was the day after the election. I’ve had plenty to say, but felt that with all of the noise cluttering my life and inbox, it was best to take a rest.It’s a new year full of dreams, challenges and so…I’m Back and, I am anxious as all heck about what our new President’s term in office might bring.

Mr. Trump represents a world view that is worlds apart from mine. Nonetheless, he is now my president and the leader of the most powerful country in the world.

For nearly four years, I have committed with all my sweat, heart and soul to create the multi faith and cultural Pico Union Project. Never before have I felt our mission ‘to love your neighbors as you wish to be loved’ to be more important. While millions of Americans are excited about the new president, our neighbors in the Pico Union are frightened that the new administration policies might tear their families apart.

America must be built on justice and equality for all of America. We cannot afford to be complacent, point fingers or demonize one other. America is what we make it, the blue states and red states, the rich and poor, day laborers and factory workers, LGBTQ, conservatives, progressives, Asians, Latinos, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians and Jews.

“In a time when some call evil “power” and some see hatred as “honor”, it was important for me to remember that I too get to say what I see; I too get to define this “America” that we are living”  – Jason Chu

With all this running through my head I decided to go back to my musical roots and together with contributions from some incredible artists and musicians create our video statement I am America. (click to watch) The message crafted alongside my collegues Stuart K Robinson and Jason Chu was simple, I am America – and so are you. Each one of us defines America by our respect for others, our kindness towards others, and our work to ensure liberty, justice, and equality for all. 

“I am America is especially pivotal in today’s political climate. As a black man, the surest path for me to avoid being marginalized is by agreeing to recognize every point of view as an equal part of America.”        – Stuart K Robinson

What makes America great is the premise that no one can define America for you – we must each do the work to support our journey towards a more perfect union. May God bless America, all those in pain and in need of healing – and while I am feeling the love, may God please bless our new president, my gut tells me he'll need it.

Are You America? Read More »

My new patriotism

Donald Trump has given America at least one gift to date. He has induced in many a powerful dose of patriotism.  I too have been swept up by it.

This new patriotism is not the version that Trump had in mind when he signed, in one of his first acts on January 20, a proclamation calling for a national day of patriotism (even though we have had, for the past fifteen years, a national Patriot Day—in commemoration of September 11).  Trump’s brand of patriotism, like his populism, is xeonophobic, paranoid, and exclusionary, and it is the kind that has always made me uncomfortable.   It is embedded in a lugubrious view of America that calls to mind the lawlessness, fear, and chaos of “Blade Runner.”  It also encourages an authoritarian streak that disregards some of the vaunted pillars of our democratic system—first and foremost, freedom of the press, which Trump and his associates attack on a daily basis.   And let us not be blithe or dismissive.  That attack is an early warning sign of the erosion of democracy.  

It is deeply disturbing to see supporters and enablers of this undemocratic agenda within our own community.  They buy into Trump’s vision of America at its worst, motivated by the unproven thesis that he will be good for Israel, while ignoring the dangers in our immediate environs, including a new bout of antisemitism.  

But there is an alternative vision of America, which Trump, through his own disregard, brings into sharp focus. At its best, America symbolizes freedom, hope, and optimism.  We are readily reminded of this when we turn to the cornerstone of American democracy, the United States Constitution—of which I bought ten pocket-sized copies last week to give to my family and friends.  The Preamble to the Constitution lays out clearly this country’s exalted mission: “to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity.”  

My own awakened patriotism is rooted in these ideals—and in defense of the accompanying rights laid out in the First Amendment: freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly.  It is this patriotism that accompanied my friend Victor Parra and me as we walked from Silver Lake to Pershing Square on Saturday, joining hundreds of thousands of others at the extraordinary and inspiring Women’s March (and millions more across the country and around the world).  Not only did I feel like we were sanctifying the Sabbath by praying with our feet, as Abraham Joshua Heschel famously described it.  I also felt like we were realizing the ideal of “We, the People”–and bringing to life the great American experiment in democracy, both of which are rooted, as were the origins of this country, in protest against injustice.  

We cannot and will not forget the many misdeeds of this country, including and especially slavery.  Nor can we ignore the unconscionably wide gap between rich and poor issuing from a distinctly American form of capitalism.  That said, American is more—much more—than its worst flaws.  Alexis de Tocqueville understood this well when he came to observe this country in 1831: “America is great because she is good,” he wrote, “and if America ever ceases to be good, she will cease to be great.”  Tocqueville grasped the fundamental goodness at the heart of the American ideal.  It is this vision of America, not Donald Trump’s darkly dystopian vision, that anchors my patriotism.  And it is this patriotism for which we must all now fight. 


David N. Myers is the Sady and Ludwig Kahn Professor of Jewish History at UCLA.

My new patriotism Read More »

Among Jerusalem embassy backers, varying views on when and how

This post originally appeared on jewishinsider.com.

Immediately following President Donald Trump’s inauguration on Friday, chatter has surfaced in Washington and Jerusalem regarding the future of the U.S. Embassy in Israel. White House Spokesman Sean Spicer issued a statement on Sunday saying, “We are at the very beginning stages of even discussing this subject.”

Among those who support the idea of moving the Embassy to Jerusalem, some are urging decisive, immediate action. The U.S. Embassy should be relocated “as soon as possible,” Mike Doran, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute told Jewish Insider. “There will be some gnashing of teeth and rending of clothes and then it will be forgotten, but the longer we drag it out the more it becomes an issue,” he added.

Referring to the 1995 Congressional bill calling for the transfer of the Embassy, Professor Eugene Kontorovich, a law professor at Northwestern University and Senior Fellow at the Kohelet Policy Forum told Jewish Insider, “The law has said that the Embassy should be relocated to Jerusalem since 1995. So, 22 years too late is the latest it should be. I see absolutely no reason for delay.”

However, Daniel Gordis, Senior Vice President at Shalem College, advocates for a more “gradual” approach. “If it happens in a month, or six months or a year, I don’t think makes much substantive difference,” he explained to Jewish Insider.

Since 1995, U.S. Presidents have signed a waiver citing National Security every six months delaying the relocation of the Embassy to Jerusalem. Former President Barak Obama last approved a waiver in December 2016. If Trump were to merely not sign such a waiver, which expires June 1, then by law the Embassy would be required to move to Jerusalem. The Orthodox Union’s Executive Director for Public Policy Nathan Diament noted that this would be an appropriate symbolic time since June 2017 is “just in time for the 50th anniversary of the reunification of Jerusalem.”

The Palestinians have vehemently protested the Embassy’s transfer. The move could “destroy the peace process” and send the region to a “path of chaos, lawlessness and extremism,” Chief Palestinian Negotiator Saeb Erekat warned in December.

How should the Embassy be moved? Kontorovich notes that “there is a large modern diplomatic facility in the Armon Hanatziv neighborhood of Jerusalem. Repurposing that for an Embassy would be both expedient and convenient.” Doran believes that the move can be done quickly given the U.S. Consulate already exists in Jerusalem. “Just change the sign on the consulate from consulate to Embassy,” he said.

Some argue that the Trump Administration should adopt a more minimalist approach to the transfer. “If the U.S. has a huge ribbon cutting ceremony with Bibi and Trump getting on the podium and making all sorts of pronouncements, I think it puts Saudi Arabia and the U.A.E. in a very uncomfortable position because they can’t not respond to something like that,” Gordis explained.

Instead, Gordis advocates for a policy where the next U.S. Ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, would initially work out of the Consulate in Jerusalem and slowly move Embassy staff to Israel’s declared capital. “Over the course of time, you can create a reality on the ground. By the time it is declared, everybody has gotten used to it,” he contended.

At the same time, Kontorovich thinks that the notion of an aggressive response by Arab gulf states has been exaggerated. “The Palestinian issue is not as burning for them as it used to be and they are otherwise engaged against Iran. If Trump combines greater toughness on Iran with a move for the Embassy that is a big net win for the Arab states,” he said.

Involving the Palestinian leadership is a critical way in reducing tensions during the Embassy transfer, Gordis cautioned. He proposes discreet conversations with President Mahmoud Abbas offering the PA ruler with certain financial offers or building permits, if the Fatah leader doesn’t “fan the flames.” However, Palestinians would lose out on these concessions if Abbas incites violence, he suggested.

Refuting the objections of many in the Arab world towards the Embassy move, Doran emphasized, “It’s ridiculous that there is this much opposition to it. In no conceivable, realistic solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, has anyone ever suggested that West Jerusalem will not be the capital of Israel. So what’s the big deal?”

Member of Knesset (Likud) Sharren Haskel– who attended the Washington inauguration — told Jewish Insider that the Trump Administration transfer of the Embassy “would be greatly appreciated.” She emphasized that the move would “send a strong message to the rest of the world.. that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel and Jerusalem will always stay the capital of Israel.”

In response to some suggesting imminent violence if the Embassy were transferred, Professor Kontorovich cited the 1998 attacks on the US Embassy in Kenya and Tanzania, which killed 224 people. After the strike, Congress substantially increased its funding for security of diplomatic compounds across the globe. Noting the potential similarity with Jerusalem, he said, “It would be a contradiction of American leadership and role in the world to have a heckler’s veto by terrorists on where US diplomatic facilities can be located.”

Among Jerusalem embassy backers, varying views on when and how Read More »