fbpx

January 18, 2017

Plato’s advice for the Trump years: Find God

Even more alarming than the rise of an intemperate real estate tycoon/reality TV star to our nation’s highest office has been the blunt realization that our democracy is fragile.

“Even democracy ruins itself by excess,” Will Durant writes in his book “The Story of Philosophy,” in the chapter summarizing Plato.

“Its basic principle is the equal right of all to hold office and determine public policy … at first glance, a delightful arrangement; [but] it becomes disastrous because the people are not properly equipped by education to select the best rulers and the wisest courses.”

Ring a bell?

Over the past several months, at least half the country probably has felt like we’ve been locked in a theater, forced to watch a political horror film. In this terrifying plot line, our established form of social organization — our hero, Democracy — has been threatened and undermined by a number of dark forces that seek its destruction, including, but not limited to, its future leader — The President.

If you doubt this, allow me to offer a few examples:

The first shock to the system came when a man, described by Atlantic magazine as “a demagogue, a xenophobe, a sexist, a know-nothing, and a liar” ran a successful campaign for president by pandering to white nationalists, inciting violence against his political opponent, praising authoritarian leaders, scapegoating minorities and immigrants, and maligning the country’s free press — a democratic institution if there ever were one — as the “crooked, dishonest media.” (How ironic that the progenitor of the decade’s biggest fake news story — that President Barack Obama was not born in the United States — is now inveighing against the dangers of fake news.) 

Next came the revelation that although this man triumphed in the broken system of the Electoral College, he lost the popular vote by one of the widest margins in American history. But it didn’t matter; he got the votes he needed where he needed them, and the rest will literally be history. 

“As to the people,” Plato writes, “they have no understanding, and only repeat what their rulers are pleased to tell them.” 

“To get a doctrine accepted or rejected,” Durant writes, paraphrasing Plato, “it is only necessary to have it praised or ridiculed in a popular play.” 

Between his ratings-winning reality TV antics and his vastly entertaining tweets (the only play I imagine Trump is capable of writing), we have seen him sell his policies, insult his critics and rile his base. He has made clear he speaks only to the PEOPLE. But as Durant reminds us, “Mob rule is a rough sea for the ship of state to ride; every wind of oratory stirs up the waters and deflects the course.” The outcome of this governing style is tyranny or autocracy, Plato teaches, because the masses so crave attention and affirmation, “that at last,” Durant writes, “the wiliest and most unscrupulous flatterer, calling himself the ‘protector of the people,’ rises to supreme power.” 

Thus the crumbling of democracy begins.

After winning the election, President-elect Donald Trump suggested the future direction of our country by assembling a government bent on certain destructions. So far, he has appointed a number of leaders who advocate dismantling the public school system, the Environmental Protection Agency and the government itself. His chief strategist and senior counselor, Steve Bannon, has described his vision for the future in the most dystopian terms: “I want to bring everything crashing down,” Bannon said in 2013. “And destroy all of today’s establishment.”

It follows then, that the country’s first (albeit deeply flawed) effort at socialized health care would come under threat, with the new president and his Congress promising to repeal legislation that will leave 18 million Americans uninsured. 

There also is Trump’s lack of reverence for the cumulative achievements that enabled his own, and for the sacrifices those before him made to Make America Great. Yes, Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) insulted Trump by calling him “illegitimate,” probably not different from how Plato might describe him. But to not acknowledge Lewis’ contribution to the civil rights movement is irresponsible and dangerous. If the head of the country doesn’t acknowledge the sacrifices of its leaders, it not only discourages future sacrifice but dispirits the body politic that admires those leaders. Democracies raise their heroes; a government by the people means crediting all of those who help build it. Placing personal insult above the communal good is the self-serving work of an autocrat and undemocratic.

For the next four years, as at least some of the ideals, principles and foundations of our democracy unravel, many of us will live with the constant thrum of fear. Democracy requires the belief that a nation’s interests are in common; if the citizenry is vehemently divided, the upshot is civil war. 

What we need now is something that inspires hope, commitment and sacrifice; which offers comfort to the afflicted and courage to the faint of heart; the only thing that can humble kings reveling in their power and glory; the thing Plato considered an absolute prerequisite for every strong nation: We need God.


Danielle Berrin is a senior writer and columnist at the Jewish Journal.

Plato’s advice for the Trump years: Find God Read More »

Haley: Trump admin. committed to longstanding U.S. policy on settlements

This story originally appeared on jewishinsider.com.

Nikki Haley, President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for U.S. Ambassador to the UN, said on Wednesday that she is committed to longstanding U.S. policy on the issue of settlement expansion.

“I do understand how they think that could hinder peace,” Haley said during her confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee when pressed on the issue by Senator Tom Udall (D-NM). 

“But my question is are you committed to the bipartisan policy on settlements?” Udall pressed the South Carolina Governor. 

“Yes, I am,” Haley responded.

Asked by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA) if the incoming Trump Administration is also committed to the longstanding policy on the issue of settlements, Haley said, “I have not heard anything different.”

Haley also stated she supports the two-state solution. But she was quick to point out that the recent UN resolution (UNSC 2334), which assailed Israel for its continued settlement construction, was “very harmful to achieving a two-state solution.”

“We need to let the two bodies resolves this themselves,” she asserted. “That is what has always taken place, and I think it’s dangerous when the UN starts to tell two different bodies what should and shouldn’t happen.”

Last week, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee passed a resolution condemning the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334. Udall introduced an amendment “reaffirming that it is also the policy of the United States to discourage settlement building.” Kaine and Cory Booker ((D-NJ) were among seven Democrats who supported the revision. Nonetheless, the amendment failed to pass as the other members of the committee including three Democrats — Robert Menendez (NJ), Ben Cardin (MD) & Christopher Coons (DE) — joined the remaining eleven Republican members on the committee to oppose the provision.

Aaron Magid contributed to this report 

Haley: Trump admin. committed to longstanding U.S. policy on settlements Read More »

A Moment in Time: A Prayer for our Country

Dear all,

The following was written by members of Temple Akiba.  It is based on liturgy in every siddur (prayer-book), as there have always been prayers for the welfare of the leadership of our country.  As we prepare for the next chapter in our nation's life, may these words embrace the souls of all.

 

Dear God,

May our leaders value the sanctity of all who dwell on earth. And may they embrace the voices of those who have come here from all corners of the earth. 
Our nation's strength emanates from diverse opinions
and free-flowing ideas. 

Provide wisdom to our leaders and their advisors.
Encourage them to listen to the people
so that our future laws are equitable,
and help them to honor the time-bound established laws of our land.

Inspire them to advance the dignity of all people in this country and around the world.

Guide our leaders to establish and maintain equitable laws, based on mutual respect , human rights,
and environmental considerations.

Oseh shalom bimromav …
Just as there is harmony among the stars,
may we work at this
a moment in time
to have balance here on earth as well.

A Moment in Time: A Prayer for our Country Read More »

Israelis to teach choreography, media arts at UCLA

UCLA students will have the opportunity this spring to study with two leading Israeli artists who combine science with the movement of bodies. 

Choreographer Shahar Biniamini and media artist Daniel Landau are among 14 top Israeli artists coming to major U.S. universities during the current academic year, as part of the Schusterman Visiting Israeli Artists Program.

Biniamini has danced with Batsheva — The Young Ensemble and Batsheva Dance Company during the past decade. Since leaving it in 2013, he continues to teach and produce the Batsheva repertoire around the world. 

Biniamini is a teacher of the movement language Gaga, improvised dance developed by Batsheva’s artistic director Ohad Naharin that sometimes appears spastic, grotesque or even silly as a way to unlock thoughts and emotions. 

Biniamini, 28, says he first became interested in dance when he was 17 years old, after seeing the Naharin-choreographed piece “Shalosh.”

“I remember the sensation I had. Not necessarily that I wanted to be a dancer, but I wanted to be part of that thing that I saw,” Biniamini said in an interview over tea at Melrose Umbrella Co.  “It came out of nowhere, and my life changed completely.”

The other visiting Israeli artist, Landau, studied music composition and new media at the Royal Conservatory in the Netherlands. His artistic installations examine the relationship between the body and technology, and he’ll work with students in the UCLA Department of Media Arts using virtual reality.

The Visiting Israeli Artists program is an initiative of the Israel Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based academic institute. The program was founded in 2008 to bring modern Israeli artists and cultural leaders to North America for residencies at cultural organizations and academic centers. Since the program began, there have been 68 residencies featuring 78 artists at colleges and universities. 

“There are universities that we’re interested in bringing artists to, and sometimes that university wants to bring a specific artist or an artist in a certain field. And other times I meet an artist that has the talent and the teaching experience,” said Marge Goldwater, director of arts and cultural programs at the Israel Institute. “Sometimes I describe myself as a matchmaker.”

Soon after leaving Batsheva, Biniamini co-founded a research group, Tnuda, to explore the connection between science and movement. Composed of dancers, choreographers and scientists, it is based at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, a town south of Tel Aviv. He founded the group with Weizmann professor Atan Gross, who studies apoptosis, or programmed cell death.  

“[Gross] sees a link between the process of dance, with bodies transferring information from one body to another, and it gives him inspiration for new directions in research on why cells commit suicide for the benefit of the whole unit,” Biniamini said.

As an independent dancer and artist, Biniamini choreographs new pieces for theaters and companies. In one piece, “Flat,” created for Frontier Danceland in Singapore, he covered one dancer with blue dots. In another,  “Yama,” he covered Japanese dancers with red dots. 

“When I work with dancers, I like to see the body. I like to see the muscles, to see the body exposed,” he said. The idea was “to create a kind of uniform without disturbing the body.”

After working with UCLA students on an original choreographed piece this spring, he plans to work with GöteborgsOperans Danskompani in Gothenburg, Sweden; followed by a collaboration with Gauthier Dance, an ensemble in Stuttgart, Germany; and a workshop in Italy’s Tuscany region.

Biniamini has also produced videos, installations and sculptures that have been presented in theaters, museums and galleries around the world. 

“It’s always a running joke between us when we talk on the phone,” Goldwater said. “I say, ‘What continent am I talking to you on?’ ”

While in Los Angeles, Biniamini will also choreograph a new piece with former Batsheva dancer and artistic director Danielle Agami and her L.A.-based ensemble, Ate9 Dance Company.

Biniamini says his goal is to found a collective of choreographers and dancers and to continue bringing innovative dance to people all over the globe.

“It’s healthy, and it can save the world,” he said.

Landau, in addition to his artistic work, led the media studies department at Beit Berl Academic College near Tel Aviv from 2012 to 2016. At 43, he is a doctoral candidate at the Aalto Institute in Finland and a senior research fellow at the Interdisciplinary Centre in Herzliya. At UCLA, Landau will work alongside Eddo Stern, a world-renowned game designer and director of the UCLA Game Lab.  

Landau’s work has been featured at international venues, museums and festivals. He is the founder of “Oh-man, Oh-machine,” an art, science and technology platform that has included a conference, a laboratory and 36-hour-long “durational workshops” in which researchers, meeting in an
airplane hangar, talk about and experience the relationship between bodies and technology.

While in California, Landau will conduct a public lecture and performance at UCLA, Caltech and Stanford called “Time-Body Study,” which he describes as a “virtual reality experiment.”

“A person from the audience is invited on stage, and not only is he placed somewhere else, as virtual reality does, he is being re-embodied,” Landau said. “He finds himself in a body of a 7-year-old, a 40-year-old and an 80-year-old.”

The project, he said, is meant to show how virtual reality may change our relationship with our own bodies and how our “physical identity can be shifted into something else.”

Another of Landau’s areas of interest is post-humanism, which he describes as “an amazing philosophical framework to reconfigure this relationship between nature, humans and computers.”

One output of that interest is a short film about Henrietta Lacks, the African-American woman whose cancerous cell lines have been used by researchers for decades to develop cures for various diseases.

Another of Landau’s projects is called “One Dimensional Man,” a theatrical piece that combines projections of faces onto masks with dancers performing alongside them.

There is a political component to his work as well. Landau contends that the goal to become a more connected society has resulted in a surveillance state, with major corporations controlling the flow of information online. The “power networks” at play in social and political structures remains a major theme of his work since returning to Israel in 2006, after studying and making art in The Hague, Netherlands, for a decade. 

Living abroad for that long, Landau said, allowed him “to see different horizons which you just can’t from within Israeli society.”

Israelis to teach choreography, media arts at UCLA Read More »

Monsters in the Elevator

I discovered the game “Monsters in the Elevator” when a friend shared it on his Facebook feed. According to its page on Indiegogo, it was created by a guy who teaches about games, with help from his daughter, and is a finalist in a Hasbro Gaming Lab contest.

There are a number of things I like about this game. First, it’s great that the inventor involved his daughter in the development of the game. Beyond just play testing it, apparently she contributed to both the game play and the art, and even created the Advanced Play mode.

Second, it involves cute monsters. Who doesn’t like cute monsters? Also, it’s quick to learn and doesn’t take forever to play (5 to 20 minutes, according to the Indiegogo page).

But there are two things in particular that I like about this game, and which distinguish it from other games.

First, it involves math. Every monster in the game has an assigned weight, and they all want to use the elevator. If the combined weight of all the monsters in the elevator is too high, the elevator crashes and the game is over. So, it’s important to be able to add up the weight of the monsters already in the elevator, and to consider the weight of any monsters you’re thinking of adding, before you make a move. With schools in the United States lagging behind in STEM subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), any game that makes math fun sounds like a good idea to me.

More than that, it’s a cooperative game. Instead of being just another game in which one player wins and all the other players lose, in this game either the weight of the monsters in the elevator is too much, causing it to crash and thereby everyone loses, or they players are able to manage the combined weight of the monsters in the elevator successfully, keeping it low enough that the elevator is able to make it to the top floor, and everyone wins.

Not only does the game make math fun as it builds on math skills, it also eschews the model of “I win when you all lose” in favor of encouraging players to work together toward a common goal. This is a value we ought to be encouraging in kids, and is one that will serve them well in many walks of life.

The game is already more than fully funded, so this is not a plea to donate. I don’t know the folks who made the game, and I’m not associated with Hasbro in any way. But if you know any kids who would benefit from a game that encourages math skills and teaches them to work together for the good of all, you may want to sign up as a backer and get a copy of the game for the very reasonable price of $10.

—————-
“Like” the Religious and Reform Facebook page to see additional photos and behind-the-scenes comments, and follow me on Twitter.

Monsters in the Elevator Read More »

Mr. Trump – Withdraw your nomination of David Friedman as US Ambassador to Israel

Note: The following is a letter being signed by rabbis and cantors across the United States. It is co-sponsored by J Street and T'ruah – Rabbis for Human Rights. I am a signatory. I do so as an individual and do not represent my synagogue or any other organization. In addition to J Street and T'ruah, the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism has expressed concerns about this nomination.

 

We are writing today as rabbis and cantors asking President Trump to withdraw the nomination of David Friedman to be the United States Ambassador to the state of Israel. Failing that, we implore the US Senate not to confirm him.”

In this letter, we will address concerns around his denigration of American Jews who believe differently from him and his policy positions that we believe run contrary to the interests of the United States and Israel.

The Rabbis of the Talmud are adamant that we are to speak to and about other people — particularly those with whom we disagree — with love and respect. We are taught that shaming a person is tantamount to shedding their blood (Baba Metzia 58b).

Yet Mr. Friedman seems to have no qualms about insulting people with whom he disagrees.

Mr. Friedman has repeatedly compared members of the Jewish community whose views on Israel differ from his own to “kapos,” who were Jews who collaborated with the Nazis during the Holocaust. He called members of J Street, a pro-Israel organization that wants to see peace between Israelis and Palestinians, “worse than kapos.” He has even questioned whether its more than 180,000 supporters are really Jews — as if he has the right to decide such a weighty matter.

This is the very antithesis of the diplomatic behavior Americans expect from their ambassadors.

An ambassador is charged with representing our entire nation. It is historically perverse and wildly insulting to characterize Jewish advocates for peace, including many of the signers of this letter, as no better than Nazi collaborators plotting to destroy the Jewish people.

If Mr. Friedman cannot responsibly understand history, he cannot responsibly shape the future.

The situation in and around Israel is volatile. Mr. Friedman’s inflammatory comments about Jews, Palestinians and Muslims and the peace process itself are precisely the type of comments that can ignite further conflict and drive deeper wedges between parties.

While we believe the above should be enough to disqualify Mr. Friedman, we have grave policy concerns as well. Mr. Friedman vocally supports the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, which American presidents since Johnson have seen as an obstacle to peace.

Moreover, Mr. Friedman opposes the two-state solution, which has been a policy cornerstone for Republican and Democratic administrations for the past quarter century. We are very concerned that rather than try to represent the US as an advocate for peace, Mr. Friedman will seek to mold American policy in line with his extreme ideology.

We yearn for an Israel that is secure, democratic and the national homeland of the Jewish people. Mr. Friedman’s pro-settler positions and opposition to the two-state solution are in conflict with our views and the majority of American Jews who see settlement expansion as an obstacle to peace and who strongly support a two-state solution. Mr. Friedman's favored policies would weaken Israel's security, democracy, and status as the national homeland of the Jewish people.

Mr. Friedman’s apparent inability to speak respectfully about and to people with whom he disagrees and his advocacy of extreme policies which threaten the future of Israel and run contrary to American interests are both sufficient reasons to disqualify Mr. Friedman's nomination. He is the wrong choice to serve as our nation’s Ambassador to Israel.

Mr. Trump – Withdraw your nomination of David Friedman as US Ambassador to Israel Read More »

The Aliyah exchange, part 2: On the effect of the Israeli rabbinate’s discrimination

Jessica Fishman moved to Israel after graduating from Indiana University with a degree in Journalism and Business. She spent her first few years in the country serving in the Israel Defense Forces, learning the Hebrew language, and getting acclimated to the country. Fishman was the author of the popular Aliyah Survival Blog and the story of her struggles with the Israeli rabbinate has been featured in leading Israeli and Jewish media.

This exchange will focus on Fishman’s upcoming memoir, Chutzpah and High Heels: The Search for Love and Identity in the Holy Land. Part one can be found here.

***

Dear Jessica,

In part one you used words like “my grieving” and “my difficult and negative experience” in reference to your dealings with the Israeli authorities and the rabbinate, who denied you the right to get married and your status as a Jew after you made aliyah and served in the military. Your anger at Israel's problematic and inconsistent attitude toward religion and state is definitely understandable.

But many people whose religious status or choice of partner aren't “kosher” according to the rabbinate choose to simply formalize their marriage abroad, a practice that the state recognizes. Many of them have big wedding services in Israel and continue living their lives without any regard for the rabbinate and how it views them. No one questions their Judaism on a daily basis, and they are just like the rest of us for all intents and purposes.

Why was your episode with the rabbinate such a defining moment in your 10-year stay in Israel? Why is this a big problem rather than a simple bureaucratic annoyance?

Yours,

Shmuel

***

Hello Shmuel,

Thank you again for this opportunity.

This is an interesting question that you put forth and one that many people have asked me. However, I always find it hard to answer. The reason I find it hard to answer is not because I don’t have a well-formed and rational response, but because I am always surprised by the premise and perceived legitimacy of this question.

First, I’d like to point out that the Rabbinate controls some of the most personal and important life moments of the Jewish lifecycle in Israel – birth, marriage, and death. This means that all Israeli Jews are denied the freedom of choice for very intimate decisions. It also means that hundreds of thousands of Israelis who do not meet the strict ultra-Orthodox definition of “who is a Jew” are excluded from enjoying basic human rights and dignity.

Next I would like to address the assumption that this discrimination stops at the chuppah and as such is not a daily hindrance. History has shown us that government-sanctioned and institutionalized discrimination sets not only a tone, but also establishes an imposed collective ethical standard. The United States has also had its fair share of discrimination in the institution of marriage. If we look back to our not-so-distant American history, interracial marriage used to be illegal. When this was the law of the land, the population itself strongly and even violently opposed these types of marriages. Today, as the laws have changed, the overwhelming majority of American society accepts and supports these relationships, marriages, and families. It has, rightfully, become unacceptable to oppose such marriages. The recent civil-rights struggle for same-sex marriage, starting at the state level and culminating with the recent landmark Supreme Court decision, Obergefell v Hodges, in which the Court found that marriage is a fundamental right and guaranteed to same-sex couples, showed us how quickly the government can change people’s hearts and minds. When a government marginalizes a class of people in marriage, then society as a whole is legitimized in discriminating against them. This condoning of discrimination occurs in both public and private spheres, including, but not limited to, the workplace, in education, when seeking healthcare, and serving in the military. It is not just discrimination by institutions, but also by individuals. In the United States, it might be using a racial or homophobic slur; in Israel it might be an ultra-Orthodox boy taunting a woman in Jerusalem by calling her a shiksa or a secular friend saying that Reform or Conservative Judaism is not really Judaism.

The last misconception that I want to touch upon is the assertion that simply going abroad to formalize your marriage and then having a ceremony or party in Israel to celebrate is an acceptable solution. There are two problems with this approach. While I am in a financial position that I could do this, many cannot afford to travel abroad. Therefore this type of marriage is only attainable for those who can afford it; but they still have been relegated to being second-class citizens. While those who cannot afford it are simply unable to marry. Is this really aligned with our Jewish values that those who don’t have the financial means to travel are denied the right to marry? I hope everyone’s answer to this question is a resounding no. The second dispute that I have with this is the general assumption that it is in any form acceptable that people like me, who bear the full duties and responsibilities of a citizen of Israel, would actually have more rights in a country in which we are not citizens than in the one that we swore to protect and defend with our lives while serving in its army. There is no reason that anybody should have to feel so marginalized in their own country.

So, in my opinion the question should not be why I took it so hard. The real question should be, why isn’t everyone else finding this situation unacceptable in a Jewish and democratic society? Where is the outrage? Is it because secular Israelis have given up and given into the control of the Rabbinate, while American Jews feel as if they need to unfailingly support Israel without any nuances? The most important lesson that I learned while going through my experience, and I think is becoming a very prevalent sentiment following the recent presidential election in the U.S., is that there is a difference between nationalism and patriotism. The former is blind support of your country. The latter is when you love you country so much that you know it is necessary to stand up, speak out, and constructively criticize the government when it is leading the country in the wrong direction. It is only hard introspection that can lead to positive change, and thus allow a country live up to its potential. True Zionism also includes dissent.  

The Aliyah exchange, part 2: On the effect of the Israeli rabbinate’s discrimination Read More »

Boys in need of a ‘Big Brother’ face long waits

Three years ago, when her son, David, was 14, Alla Doner signed him up with Jewish Big Brothers Big Sisters of Los Angeles (JBBBSLA). Diagnosed with autism, David had withdrawn from the world. He had lost faith in humanity, his mother says, due to intense bullying he faced from his peers in middle school.

 “David stopped believing in people. He didn’t want to communicate, which was why it was important to us to find somebody who will be there for David — but not as a therapist,” Doner said.

JBBBSLA has paired children in need with mentors for more than 100 years. It was the right place for David, but it took a year before the organization found an appropriate mentor for him. It was then that David was matched with Douglas Shapiro, a man in his 60s, who became his “big brother.”

 “It was a year that David could’ve benefited, and he didn’t,” Doner said, adding that she is nevertheless appreciative of the organization.

The family’s situation illustrates a problem currently facing JBBBSLA, a one-to-one mentoring organization that pairs mentors, known as “Bigs,” with children, known as “Littles.” The organization is short on male volunteers, especially those qualified to work with special needs boys.

Currently, 40 children — 33 of them boys — are on the waitlist, according to JBBBSLA Director of Program Services Megan Koehler. The organization currently serves 200 children.

Disparities are not unusual. In the volunteer world, more women are interested in helping than men. And because most families prefer someone of the same gender as their child’s mentor, having to wait for a mentor is not uncommon, with more boys than girls in need. 

“Most single-parent headed households are headed by women,” said Koehler, a licensed clinical social worker. “If you have a mother with a daughter and a son, she is more likely looking for a same-sex role model for her son and is able to be there for the daughter.”

According to The New York Times, the first Big Brother chapter, founded in Cincinnati, was “predominately Jewish.” Its founder, Irvin F. Westheimer, a whiskey salesman and investment broker of German-Jewish descent who died in 1980 at the age of 101, described himself, as quoted in the Times, as an “American of the Jewish faith” who became interested in the plight of fatherless boys after seeing a boy and his dog rummaging through a dumpster in search of food outside of his office one Saturday morning. 

JBBBSLA, which celebrated its 100th anniversary in 2015, is an affiliate of Big Brothers Big Sisters of America. Currently serving 200 children, JBBBSLA is one of three Big Brothers Big Sisters organizations in the Los Angeles area — and not the only one facing a waitlist problem. 

Catholic Big Brothers Big Sisters (CBBBS) in Los Angeles, which currently is serving 400 children, has nearly another 400 on its waitlist, 80 percent of whom are boys, said Rosario Di Prima, vice president of programs at CBBBS, a partner organization of JBBBSLA. While the Catholic organization is open to people of all faiths, JBBBSLA is Jews-only. 

The third group, Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Los Angeles, currently serves approximately 1,700 children, with another 300 to 400 waiting, said Patti Johnson, the group’s director of marketing, adding, “The biggest waitlist challenges are definitely boys; between 70 to 80-percent of kids on the waitlist are boys.”

JBBBSLA serves children ages 6 to 18. The program is free, and the organization puts on activities at Camp Bob Waldorf on the Max Straus Campus in Glendale. Mentors are responsible for paying the costs of other activities.

Mentors and their mentees meet a minimum of two or three times a month for two to three hours each time. 

All JBBBSLA mentors are Jewish, and the organization serves Jewish kids of all levels of religious observance. Orthodox boys are often difficult to pair up because they have less available time to meet, Koehler said. The organization has done outreach in the Pico-Robertson area, an Orthodox neighborhood, by placing signs in the area’s restaurants, advertising the need for volunteers. 

Meanwhile, siblings of special needs children who cannot get the attention they need from their parents due to the demands of their sibling’s disability make up a sizable portion of children served. Doner’s daughter, Emma, 12, became a JBBBSLA mentee five years ago, when the waiting time was only about two months. She recently was matched up with a new mentor — the average duration of a mentor-mentee relationship is one year — and the wait this time was nine months.

Currently, the average waits for girls and boys are three and six months, respectively.

Doner originally is from Ukraine. She immigrated to Israel in 1990, when Ukraine was still part of the Soviet Union, and settled in northern Israel, near Lebanon. Fed up with the frequent fighting, she left for the United States in 1997. 

David was born in Los Angeles and diagnosed with autism at age 3. 

During middle school, he faced his greatest challenges, with students calling him derogatory names and tying him up, Doner said, crying as she recalled these incidents. The teachers were of little help, his mother said, and he was pulled out of school. 

 “David felt betrayed by everybody,” she said.

The family decided to find a mentor for David, somebody cool and hip — somebody who could help David come out of his shell.

And today, he is verbal. 

“He’s weird-verbal, but he’s verbal,” Doner said. “If you want to talk to him about music, bands, he’s an encyclopedia. If you want to ask him, ‘What do you think about politics?’ he will say something like ‘Trump sucks.’ ”

Shapiro, 69, a resident of Tarzana and a reimbursement manager at a homebuilding finance company, expressed disappointment that there are not more volunteers who are interested in devoting their time to becoming mentors at JBBBSLA. 

“It’s  a sad state of affairs. There’s a lot of need and a lot of people just don’t want to do it,” Shapiro said. “It’s a sad thing.”

The divorced father of two, whose daughter motivated him to sign up, said working with David has brought him joy because he is making a difference in somebody else’s life.

“Some days are challenging but there are a lot of days that are enjoyable,” Shapiro said. “I can relate to him and do things with him that he canrelate to, too.”

David and Douglas go bowling, play soccer, have long chats over hot chocolate. Doner referred to Douglas as the “most incredible older gentleman.”

Given how successful the relationship has been, the wait, she said, was worth it.

“For our family, JBBBS[LA] — it’s not baby-sitting services. It’s lifelong friendship, mentoring and support,” Doner said. “Yes, it took David over a year to find the right match, but it was worth the wait.”

Boys in need of a ‘Big Brother’ face long waits Read More »

Obama, in final press conference, discusses UNSC Resolution 2334

President Barack Obama on Wednesday during his final press conference, delivered a lengthy response when a reporter asked him about the recent U.N. Security Council Resolution 2334, which describes Israeli settlements as illegal. The United States abstained from the Dec. 23 vote, thereby enabling the resolution to pass. Here are the outgoing president’s remarks in full:

“I continue to be significantly worried about the Palestinian issue. And I am worried about it both because I think the status quo is unsustainable, that it is dangerous for Israel, that it is bad for Palestinians, bad for the region, bad for America’s national security.

“And I came into this office wanting to do everything I could to encourage serious peace talks between Israelis and Palestinians, and we invested a lot of energy, a lot of time, a lot of effort, the first year, the second year, all the way until last year. Ultimately, what has always been clear, is we cannot force parties to arrive at peace. What we can do is facilitate, provide a platform, encourage, but we can’t force them to do it.

“But in light of shifts in Israeli politics and Palestinian politics, a rightward drift in Israeli politics, a weakening of [Palestinian Authority] President [Mahmoud] Abbas’ ability to move and take risks on behalf of peace in the Palestinian territories, in light of all the dangers that have emerged in the regions and the understandable fears Israelis may have — chaos and the rise of groups like ISIL and the deterioration of Syria — in light of all those things, what we at least wanted to do, understanding the two parties would not arrive at a final status agreement, is preserve the possibility of a two-state solution because we don’t see an alternative to it.

“I’ve said directly to [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu], I’ve said it inside of Israel and I’ve said it to Palestinians as well: I don’t see how this issue gets resolved in a way that maintains Israel as both Jewish and a democracy because if you do not have two states, then in some form or fashion, extending an occupation, functionally you end up having one state in which millions of people are disenfranchised and operate as second-class occupants — residents — you can’t even call them ‘citizens,’ necessarily.

“So the goal of the [Security Council] resolution is to simply say settlements — the growth of settlements — are creating a reality on the ground that increasingly will make a two-state solution impossible. And we’ve believed, consistent with the position taken previously by U.S. administrations for decades now, it was important for us to send a signal — a wake-up call — that this moment may be passing, and Israeli voters and Palestinians need to understand this moment may be passing and hopefully that then creates a debate inside both Israeli and Palestinian communities.

“It won’t result immediately in peace but will at least lead to a more sober assessment of what the alternatives are.”

Obama, in final press conference, discusses UNSC Resolution 2334 Read More »

Trump, racism, sexism — and hope

The Trump inauguration approaches just as many people are emerging from their post-election funk. Many of us seem poised to enter a new depression as “the Donald” actually becomes our commander in chief, tweets and all.

It is no challenge to find statements, tweets, actions and appointments of the president-elect that could justify retreat to a fetal position in a dark room. The future does look bleak for those who are concerned about the disadvantaged, access to affordable health care, childhood vaccinations and a respect for science — to say nothing about the makeup of the Supreme Court. Most of the new administration’s policy prescriptions are troubling.

To compound the general anxiety, there is emerging research that suggests that a critical portion of Trump’s electoral success can be ascribed more to racism and sexism than the economic dislocation and fear that has been the staple of most media analyses over the past two months.

Three political scientists (Brian Schaffner, Matthew MacWilliams and Tatishe Nteta) authored a paper published earlier this month that found “racism and sexism were much more important [than economic dissatisfaction]” in explaining the yawning gap in support between Hillary Clinton and Trump among whites without a college degree.

Their statistical analysis indicates that “sexism and racism were strongly associated with presidential vote choice in 2016” and, most importantly, those views were likely the main driver of the huge gap between support for Clinton and Trump among non-college-educated white voters.

Of course, they warn that “it would be misguided to seek an understanding of Trump’s success through any single lens.”

For one who has spent the past four decades in the civil rights field convinced that America was making inexorable progress toward a “more perfect union,” this is not heartwarming news. The notion that crass appeals to our baser instincts could bear electoral fruit and vault someone into the presidency is depressing.

Despite what has occurred, the good news still outweighs the bad. The presence of bigotry in the electoral motivations of some does not negate the progress that has been made among the many.

In a recent post-election interview, Harvard’s Steven Pinker (author of “The Better Angels of Our Nature,” among others) warns about getting too concerned with the headlines of the day and the media’s “given wisdom.” The fact is that well-established trends and attitudes transcend the vagaries of one election.

He discourses on the major societal trends that prevail, no matter what happened on Nov. 8:

“More generally, the worldwide, decades-long current toward racial tolerance is too strong to be undone by one man … more importantly for the future … younger cohorts are less prejudiced than older ones. As my own cohort of baby boomers (who helped elect Trump) dies off and is replaced by millennials (who rejected him in droves), the world will become more tolerant”(emphasis added).

In his farewell address last week, President Obama perceptively made the same point:

“And that’s why I leave this stage tonight even more optimistic about this country than when we started. Because I know our work has not only helped so many Americans, it has inspired so many Americans — especially so many young people out there — to believe that you can make a difference, to hitch your wagon to something bigger than yourselves.

“Let me tell you, this generation coming up — unselfish, altruistic, creative, patriotic — I’ve seen you in every corner of the country. You believe in a fair, and just, and inclusive America… You are willing to carry this hard work of democracy forward. You’ll soon outnumber all of us, and I believe as a result the future is in good hands” (emphasis added).

Pinker’s analysis goes beyond rising tolerance to an assessment of several other metrics of progress “… in just about every way. Extreme poverty, child mortality, illiteracy, and global inequality are at historic lows; vaccinations, basic education, including girls, and democracy are at all-time highs (emphasis added).

“War deaths have risen since 2011 because of the Syrian civil war, but are a fraction of the levels of the 1950s through the early 1990s, when mega-death wars and genocides raged all over the world. … Homicide rates in the world are falling, and the rate in the United States is lower than at any time between 1966 and 2009. Outside of war zones, terrorist deaths are far lower than they were in the heyday of the Weathermen, IRA, and Red Brigades” (emphasis added).

If one wants to see the dark clouds on the horizon, there are plenty; the next four years may be very rocky — the nightly news will stream awful stories and troubling facts. Yet, the barrage of bad news is rarely contextualized and set in its historic context. By most measures, we and the world are doing better than we ever have, if not as well as we might.

How far off of this trajectory we can be driven is today’s critical question. Will our institutions be resilient enough to withstand the onslaught and will the attitudes of young people remain as positive and forward-looking as they are today? We will see and we can hope.


DAVID A. LEHRER, is the president of Community Advocates, Inc., a Los Angeles-based human relations organization chaired by former Mayor Richard Riordan. For 27 years, he served locally with the Anti-Defamation League as counsel and regional director.

Trump, racism, sexism — and hope Read More »