fbpx

January 15, 2017

Graphic essay: What the Civil Rights Movement can teach us about surviving Trump


The election felt like an apocalyptic nightmare. Yet writer and illustrator Chris Noxon, a member of my synagogue community, managed to find some powerful inspiration on a recent trip and write it as a graphic essay.

Chris' work is particularly well done and powerful. Given the most recent slander yesterday of one of America's great heroes, Congressman John Lewis, by President-Elect Trump, it takes on even greater significance given what I fear we're about to experience in Trump's presidency, however long it lasts.

Scroll through it and be inspired on this weekend commemorating the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

https://www.google.com/amp/fusion.net/story/379938/comic-trump-election-protest-civil-rights-movement-memphis/amp/?client=safari

Graphic essay: What the Civil Rights Movement can teach us about surviving Trump Read More »

Sunday Reads: Plan B for Israel & Palestine, Will allies trust Trump?, Love in the book of Ruth

US

Adam Schatz writes about how ” target=”_blank”>might start keeping America in the dark due to Trump’s possible ties to Moscow:

One concern arising from Trump’s cozy relationship with Moscow is that American allies in possession of intelligence related to the actions of Russia or its associates—notably the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism, Iran—will withhold their findings. The fear is that American allies will perceive the administration to be compromised by Russia and that any intelligence they share with the Trump administration will be exposed to Moscow-linked agents.

Israel

Stuart Eizenstat and Dennis Ross present their ” target=”_blank”>serious life-quality improvements in the past decade:

Between 2005 and 2011, inflation-adjusted Arab net family income increased by 7.4 percent. As a result, the share of Arab families that were “very satisfied” with their economic conditions rose from 40 percent in 2004-2005 to 60 percent in 2010-2011.  Indeed, recent surveys show Arab families have virtually the same level of satisfaction with their lives as Jewish families.

Middle East

Amos Yadlin and Avner Golov believe that Trump should try to ” target=”_blank”>Russia and Turkey’s “marriage of convenience”:

For now at least, two repressive populist leaders, Erdogan and Putin, have struck up a marriage of convenience. Erdogan is hard at work pushing through a constitutional change that will officially make him, not unlike Putin, the sole decision-maker. They share an ingrained animosity toward the West, have no interest in interfering in each other’s internal affairs, and are unencumbered by domestic opposition, granting them a remarkable degree of flexibility. Can it last?

Jewish Journal

Alan Rubenstein examines the sophisticated ” target=”_blank”>Jewish Democrats need to fight for their party:

Jewish Democrats, in particular, have a job to do in their party, just as #NeverTrump Republicans had a job to do in theirs. For the danger to American Jewish voters is now manifesting itself in both parties—and Jewish Democrats need to face up to that fact right now, or else there won’t be a party in this country that refuses a prominent place to bigots. If Jewish Democrats think their party will be a welcoming place for them, (never mind electable at the national level), with a former associate of the Nation of Islam as its chairman, they’re meshuggah.

Sunday Reads: Plan B for Israel & Palestine, Will allies trust Trump?, Love in the book of Ruth Read More »

Rafsanjani was nothing more than a brutal criminal

This past week following the death of Iranian Ayatollah Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani on January 8th, I was utterly shocked and amazed at the response from the media and the U.S. State Department to this news out of Iran. Many news media outlets in Europe or the United States have identified him as a “moderate”, a “reformist” and one ridiculous CNN opinion piece even referred to him as a “man of peace”. These descriptions of the brutal Rafsanjani were not only completely false but downright ridiculous given the blood-thirsty unmerciful reign of terror he carried out in Iran and outside of Iran during the last 37 years. What was even more surprising to me was the fact that the Obama State Department sent an official letter of condolence to Rafsanjani’s family in Iran! Honoring a despicable man who was directly responsible as one of the founders of the largest state-sponsor of radical Islamic terrorism and a man that was directly responsible of killing hundreds of thousands of Iranians as well as thousands of others outside the country is simply insanity! Those in the Western media who have called Rafsanjani a “moderate” or a “man of peace” are either completely delusional or totally blind to the true facts of history surrounding this evil man.

Iranian Americans like myself who are fluent in Farsi and are well aware of the long bloody history of Rafsanjani’s brutal reign of power in Iran know the truth about this man. As a close confidant—  and perhaps the number two man to the Iranian regime’s founder the Ayatollah Khomeini, Rafsanjani was one of the early regime henchmen that helped set up and solidify the power base of the entire repressive regime in Iran. He and other clerics in Iran set the new regime up based on the repressive principles of radical Shiite Islamic law. Wielding incredible power, Rafsanjani cracked down hard on any political opposition to the Iranian regime in the 1980s by arresting, imprisoning and even executing opposition members. In fact, news out of Iran last year pointed to Rafsanjani’s directly involvement with ordering the 1988 execution of nearly 30,000 political prisoners in Iran. He served as president of the Iranian regime for a number of years, speaker of the Iranian regime’s parliament–  all positions in which he used his power to crush journalists, artists, women, religious minorities, labor union leaders and “other enemies of the Iranian state”. Perhaps one of his lesser known roles was that of commander-in-chief of the Iranian regime’s military during the Iran-Iraq war. He was believed to be responsible for developing the tactic in which Iranian children were forced to run through mine fields during the war in order to clear them for soldiers launching attacks against Iraqi forces. More importantly, Rafsanjani was head of an Islamic body that helped appoint Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as Iran’s new “supreme leader” after the death of Khomeini in 1989. Rafsanjani essentially put into power the most influential man in Iran today that has been calling for and advancing efforts for Israel’s and America’s annihilation on a daily basis!

But Rafsanjani’s evil was not only limited to Iran. As one of the key leaders of the regime, he directed funds and orders to the Iranian terror proxy, Hezbollah to carry out countless terrorist strikes against opponents of the Iranian regime worldwide. For example, an Argentine court in 2006 found Rafsanjani was directly responsible for ordering Hezbollah to carry out the 1994 bombing of a Buenos Aires Jewish community center that killed 85 people and wounded more than 300 individuals. Additionally, in 1993 a German court determined that Rafsanjani was directly responsible for ordering the Iranian regime’s agents in Germany to assassinate three Iranian-Kurdish opposition leaders who were gun down while eating at a Greek restaurant in Berlin.

Moreover it’s hard for anyone to believe an unapologetic anti-Semite and Israel hater like Rafsanjani could ever be considered a “moderate” based on his very bold and clear comments made over the years. On December 14, 2001 at Tehran University during the annual Al-Quds Day protest against Israel, Rafsanjani said in a speech “if one day, the Islamic world is also equipped with weapons like those that Israel possesses now, then the imperialists’ strategy will reach a standstill because the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality”. In addition Rafsanjani in an October 2007 televised speech on Iranian state-run television said that Hitler’s treatment of the Jewish people in Europe was due in part to their being “a pain in the neck”. He also said in the speech that the Jews caused problems for European governments because they “had a lot of property” and “controlled an empire of propaganda”. Lastly Rafsanjani said that the Nazis were successful in saving Europe from the evil of Zionism. (This is a link to video footage of Rafsanjani’s broadcasted speech with subtitles provided by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI): MEMRI TV

In the end it is a sad say in America when the U.S. State Department tries to cozy up to the evil leaders of the Iranian regime with this insane condolence letter for Rafsanjani despite his long record of anti-Semitism, despite his calls for genocide against Israel and despite his thousands of crimes against in the people of Iran. Likewise it is shameful when so many Western media outlets call an evil criminal like Rafsanjani a “moderate” when the facts are clear about his direct role in imprisoning, torturing and executing hundreds of thousands of political opponents in Iran and also directing international terrorist attacks against his opponents. How could anyone in their right mind claim that Rafsanjani was a “moderate” or a “man of peace” when his records of crimes against humanity are too long to list? This man was nothing more than a brutal criminal who escaped justice after all of the crimes he committed against innocent Iranians and others. One must not rejoice at the news of Rafsanjani’s death, but acknowledge that he was an evil leader of the Iranian regime who does not deserve praise for advancing terrorism and committing heinous crimes against humanity.

Rafsanjani was nothing more than a brutal criminal Read More »

A dream too far: Lessons from Selma

There is something tragic about the civils rights movement—the very fact that it was needed in the first place. Why did it have to be such a big deal to give Blacks the right to vote? By today’s standards, it seems downright absurd to deny Blacks, or anyone else for that matter, this fundamental right.

It was that simple notion of voting that lingered anxiously in my mind this past Shabbat as I walked for hours through the streets of Selma, Alabama. I was on a Martin Luther King weekend solidarity mission organized by my friend Rabbi Shmuel Herzfeld, who runs the modern Orthodox Ohev Shalom synagogue in Washington, D.C. A few months ago, at his Shabbat table, Herzfeld invited me join his community for the three-day journey to honor the civil rights movement. Having a teenage daughter who loves any idea that includes the words “social” and “justice,” I signed up for the adventure.

Among the many things we did—including praying in a 117-year-old synagogue in Selma, visiting the home where Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel spent the night before marching with King, and crossing the Edmund Pettus bridge that kicked off that famous five-day march from Selma to Montgomery in 1965—I think what stuck with me the most was that long afternoon walking with my daughter through the decaying town of Selma.

Two ideas clashed during our walk—hope versus despair. In a museum, I would see words of hope from heroic quotes such as this one, from President Lyndon Johnson in 1965:

“The vote is the most powerful instrument ever devised by man for breaking down injustice and destroying the terrible walls which imprison men because they are different from other men.”

This is the part of Selma that reminds you of how oppressive things used to be during the days of segregation, when Blacks could not even pull up at an ice cream counter or register to vote.

But as we walked through streets with abandoned buildings and broken down homes, with one storefront after another peddling “pay day loans” and a boarded-up building with an old “Rite-Aid” sign, I couldn’t help thinking about the limits of Johnson’s “most powerful instrument ever devised by man.”

What good is the powerful freedom to vote if you’re living in a place that feels like an enormous prison with a Walmart?

What good is the right to pick your political leaders if those leaders keep betraying you?

President Johnson saw this coming in his 1965 speech, which is why he challenged Black leadership to move beyond the success of the civil rights movement:

“This act is not only a victory for Negro leadership. This act is a great challenge to that leadership. It is a challenge that cannot be met simply by protest and demonstrations.”

When you see the sad state of Selma today, it’s hard not to conclude that this town of 20,000 mostly Black residents is in need of strong leadership– at the local, state and federal levels.

One of the few remaining Jews in Selma shared some candid thoughts with me about how Selma is often used by political leaders at all levels for “photo-opportunities”— to burnish their street cred for fighting for Black rights.

Fighting for “rights,” though, doesn’t seem to be the dream of the day in Selma. They have every right to walk into a movie theater, but the theater burned down years ago and was never replaced. They have every right to vote for the candidate of their choice, but their lives are as miserable as ever.

No, the dream I saw as I walked through Selma on Shabbat was the dream to make a decent living and put those “pay-day loans” hustlers out of business. 

We saw a ray of hope at our Shabbat dinner Friday night. His name is Darrio Melton, the young new Black mayor of Selma. If he takes his job as seriously as he takes his city, there is hope. “Selma is the birthplace of American democracy,” he told us, meaning that until Blacks got their civil rights, America could not claim to be a real democracy. 

In speaking with us, both publicly and in private, it was clear that Melton would love nothing more than to attract more visitors to his little town. Maybe that’s why his key campaign promise was to address the city’s current crime problem. He understands that no city can succeed and attract jobs and businesses until it makes it safe to do so. 

Melton has benefitted from the Black right to vote. If he fails to deliver on his promises, he will diminish the power of this basic right. But if he does deliver, he will honor the “most powerful instrument ever devised by man” and the many who were forced to fight for something they should never have had to fight for.

A dream too far: Lessons from Selma Read More »