fbpx

December 28, 2016

Double Exposure

This time it felt like the lowering of the coffin was taking place in a slow-motion film. When it finally bottomed, the descent seemed deeper than usual too. I have officiated at perhaps over one hundred funerals, so you would think I would know the norms. But this one was for my own father. Intellectually I knew the steepness must be the same. And others present assured me the coffin was going down at the typical speed. As the funeral went on I was in two places at once: as death professional and as mourner. Would this make my mourning easier or more complex, or both? A few weeks ago, my husband Steve and I co-officiated for my 95-year-old father at this simple gathering that barely topped a minyan. I chose to chant the el male rachamim, the prayer of mercy, which came so soon I whispered to Steve, “I do this already?” It felt like we had skipped part of the service. Well, good, I thought. My professional role was not crowding out all the effects of grieving: an agonizingly slow lowering, a harrowing depth, and distorted time. As I chanted, I felt like I was doing a once-in-a-lifetime mitzvah. How many mourners have the opportunity to ritually sing of God’s “sheltering presence” and “finding refuge in the shadow of the Eternal’s wings” as part of their send-off for a loved one?

During the shiva, mulling over the idea of returning to work soon after was nauseating at first. Being a hospice chaplain is not exactly a good distraction from funerals and grieving. But there is the comfort of colleagues, and we certainly have been more on the same page than colleagues of other professions could have been. Also I do not have to bear the stupid or insensitive remarks I have had to endure elsewhere, such as, “It’ll be easier for you. Old people are so hard to take care of anyway.” Yep. A distant relative actually said that to me as the body was being shipped across state lines to its final destination. As for taking care of patients and their families, at first I told myself that other people’s problems were a break from the constant rewind tapes of my own. Maybe I could not concentrate as well as usual, but it sufficed. After the blur of the first day or so, I then pondered how my thoughts and feelings were running more parallel to those of the people I was serving than ever before. I felt more united with families, thinking, “I’ve just been through what you are going through. I’m with you. I can relate.” So the upside of going back to work is that I have not had to pretend and put on a happy face. Most of all, I feel more deeply the power of the mitzvah of visiting the sick and accompanying the bereaved. I am honoring my father’s legacy by striving to do compassionate acts in the context of a now tighter bond between myself and those I serve.

  

          ______________

GAMLIEL INSTITUTE COURSES

        Winter 2016:

NOT TOO LATE – THERE IS STILL TIME – REGISTRATION IS OPEN: THE COURSE BEGAN THIS WEEK!

Gamliel Institute Course 1, Chevrah Kadisha History, Origins, & Evolution (HOE) as planned will be offered over twelve weeks on Tuesday evenings. The schedule is from December 6th, 2016 to February 21st, 2017, online. There are still a few slots open in the entering class!  

CLASSES

Class times will all be 5-6:30 pm PST/6-7:30 pm MST/7-8:30 CST/8-9:30 pm EST. [If you are in any other time zone, please determine the appropriate time, given local time and any Time Zone adjustments that may be necessary.]

Please note: the class meetings will be online, and will take place on Tuesday evenings (unless a Jewish holiday requires a change of date for a class session).  

DESCRIPTION

The focus of this course is on the history and development of the modern Chevrah Kadisha, the origins of current practices, and how the practices and organizations have changed to reflect the surrounding culture, conditions, and expectations. The course takes us through the various text sources (biblical, talmudic, rabbinic, and on) to seek the original basis of the Chevrah Kadisha, harking to Prague in the 1600’s, through the importation of the Chevrah Kadisha to America, and all the way to recent days. It is impossible to really understand how we came to the current point without a sense of the history.

SIGN UP NOW TO TAKE THIS COURSE!

Please register, note it on your calendar, and plan to attend the online sessions.

There is no prerequisite for this course; you are welcome to take it with no prior knowledge or experience, though interest in the topic is important.

The registration fee is $500.00 per person, but NOTE that there are registration discounts available for three or more persons from the same organization, and for clergy and students. There are also some scholarship funds available on a ‘need’ basis. Contact us (information below) with any questions.

You can “>jewish-funerals.org/gamreg. A full description of all of the courses is found there.

For more information, visit the “>Kavod v’Nichum website or on the

Please contact us for information or assistance. info@jewish-funerals.org or j.blair@jewish-funerals.org, or call 410-733-3700, or 925-272-8563.

 

        LOOKING FORWARD:

UPCOMING COURSE

Gamliel Institute will be offering course 4, Nechama [Comfort], online, evenings in the Spring on Tuesdays (and three Thursdays – the day of the week will change in those weeks with Jewish holidays during this course). The date of classes will be from March 28 to June 13 2017. Please note: due to holidays, classes will meet on Thursdays on April 13th, April 20th, and June 1st. There will be an orientation session on Monday, March 27th, 2017.  

COURSE PREVIEW

If you are not sure if the Nechama course is for you, plan to attend the Free one-time online PREVIEW of Nechama session planned for the Monday evening March 6th, 2017 at 8-9:30 pm EST. The instructors will offer highlights from the material that the course covers, and let you know what the course includes.

You can “>jewish-funerals.org/gamreg. A full description of all of the courses is found there.

For more information, visit the “>Kavod v’Nichum website or on the info@jewish-funerals.org or j.blair@jewish-funerals.org, or call 410-733-3700, or 925-272-8563.

__________________

TASTE OF GAMLIEL

From Here to Eternity: Jewish Views on Sickness and Dying.

In 2017, Kavod v'Nichum and the Gamliel Institute are again sponsoring a five part “Taste of Gamliel” webinar. This year's topic is From Here to Eternity: Jewish Views on Sickness and Dying. Last year's Taste of Gamliel topic was Jewish beliefs about the Afterlife. 

Each 90 minute session is presented by a different scholar. Taste of Gamliel gives participants a “Taste” of the Gamliel Institute's web-based series of courses. The Gamliel Institute is the leadership training arm of Kavod v'Nichum. The Institute, offers five on-line courses, each 12 weeks in length, that deal with the various aspects of Jewish ritual around sickness, death, funerals, burial and mourning. Participants come from all over the United States and Canada.

Webinars are on January 22, February 19, March 19, April 23, and May 21. Learn from the comfort of your home or office.

The Taste sessions are done in a webinar format, where the teacher and students can see each other’s live video feeds. The sessions are moderated, we mute participants, ask them to raise their virtual hands with questions, and call on and unmute participants when appropriate. We've been teaching using this model for seven years (more than 250 session). We use Zoom, a particularly friendly tool.

Webinar sessions are free, with a suggested minimum donation of $36 for all five sessions. Online sessions are 60-90 minutes. Sessions begin at 5 PM PST; 8 PM EST.

Those registered will be sent the information on how to connect to the sessions. The link to ” target=”_blank”>http://jewish-funerals.givezooks.com/events/taste-of-gamliel-2017

Information and technology assistance is available after you register. 

You can view a recording of the sessions after each session.

More info – Call us at 410-733-3700   

Attend as many of these presentations as are of interest to you. Each session is between 60 and 90 minutes in duration. As always, there will be time for questions and discussions at the end of each program. 

The entire series is free, but we ask that you make a minimum donation of $36 for the five sessions. 

Click the  Suggestions for future topics are welcome. 

__________________

KAVOD v’NICHUM CONFERENCE

Looking ahead, hold June 18-20, 2017 for the 15th annual Kavod v’Nchum Chevrah Kadisha and Cemetery Conference, scheduled for San Rafael, CA.

____________________

DONATIONS:

Donations are always needed and most welcome. Donations support the work of Kavod v’Nichum and the Gamliel Institute, helping us provide scholarships to students, refurbish and update course materials, expand our teaching, support programs such as Taste of Gamliel, provide and add to online resources, encourage and support communities in establishing, training, and improving their Chevrah Kadisha, and assist with many other programs and activities.

You can donate online at You can also become a member (Individual or Group) of Kavod v’Nichum to help support our work. Click  

___________

MORE INFORMATION

If you would like to receive the Kavod v’Nichum Newsletter by email, or be added to the Kavod v’Nichum Chevrah Kadisha & Jewish Cemetery email discussion list, please be in touch and let us know at info@jewish-funerals.org.

You can also be sent an email link to the Expired And Inspired blog each week by sending a message requesting to be added to the distribution list to j.blair@jewish-funerals.org.

Be sure to check out the Kavod V’Nichum website at “>Gamliel.Institute website.

 

RECEIVE NOTICES WHEN THIS BLOG IS UPDATED!

Sign up on our Facebook Group page: just search for and LIKE “>@chevra_kadisha.

To find a list of other blogs and resources we think you, our reader, may find of interest, click on “About” on the right side of the page.There is a link at the end of that section to read more about us.

Past blog entries can be searched online at the L.A. Jewish Journal. Point your browser to ____________________

SUBMISSIONS ALWAYS WELCOME

If you have an idea for an entry you would like to submit to this blog, please be in touch. Email J.blair@jewish-funerals.org. We are always interested in original materials that would be of interest to our readers, relating to the broad topics surrounding the continuum of Jewish preparation, planning, rituals, rites, customs, practices, activities, and celebrations approaching the end of life, at the time of death, during the funeral, in the grief and mourning process, and in comforting those dying and those mourning, as well as the actions and work of those who address those needs, including those serving in Bikkur Cholim, Caring Committees, the Chevrah Kadisha, Shomrim, funeral providers, funeral homes and mortuaries, and operators and maintainers of cemeteries.

 

              _____________________

Double Exposure Read More »

The Mamaleh exchange, part 3: On a couple of all-time great Jewish mothers

” target=”_blank”>Mamaleh Knows Best: What Jewish Mothers Do to Raise Successful, Creative, Empathetic, Independent Children. Parts 1 and 2 can be found ” target=”_blank”>here.

***

Dear Marjorie,

Seeing that Jewish mothering – and mothering in general – is such a thankless job sometimes, I would like to use the last instalment of this exchange to ask you to shed light on 2-3 truly exceptional Jewish mothers who exemplify some of the parenting lessons you write about. As “the person who wrote the book” about Jewish mothers, I must ask you who some of your personal all-time greats are.

Thanks once again for the book and for taking the time to do this exchange.

Yours 

Shmuel

***

Dear Shmuel,

I love this question!

One thing I discovered while writing the book was that a lot of prominent Jewish women leaders, writers, artists and intellectuals were childless. As were, of course, a lot of leaders of the early feminist movement in the UK and US; it’s hard to throw yourself fully into a career when you’re also responsible for managing a household and raising children. So I want to begin with a shout-out to the amazing Jewish mothers whose names are lost to history. Fame is not the only measure of success.

That said, one once-famous Jewish mother in my book who fascinates me is Annie Londonderry (aka Annie Cohen Kopchovsky). Like my own grandmother, she was born in Riga, Latvia and emigrated to Boston as a child. By the time she was 17, both her parents were dead, and she and her brother raised their younger siblings. In 1888, at 18, she married a peddler and quickly began having children of her own. She helped support them by selling newspaper ad space. As legend had it, she overheard a bet one day between two rich men about whether a woman was capable of riding a bicycle around the world. She’d never even been on a bicycle, and her kids were only 5, 3 and 2, but she decided she was just the lady for the job.

She found herself a sponsor — Londonderry Lithia Spring Water of New Hampshire — and rebranded  herself Annie Londonderry. (Less Jewish, more jaunty!) She made it from Boston to NYC in only eight days, but it took her two months to get to Chicago. When she finally arrived, she ditched her skirt for still-scandalous bloomers, and swapped her unwieldy 42-pound ladies’ bicycle for a much lighter men’s version. She courted newspapers everywhere she went, sold souvenirs, gave bicycling clinics for women. She “turned herself into a mobile billboard,” wrote her great-great-grand-nephew Peter Zheutlin: “Sometimes she was practically covered from head to toe with ribbons, banners, and streamers stitched or attached to her clothing.” The inventor of sports marketing and athletic branding was a Jewish girl!

Kopchevsky did make it around the world, but did so mostly by boat, theatrically taking short land rides on her bike. She became a media darling, a spokeswoman for a bicycle company, and a writer whose account of her journey ran on the front page of the New York World newspaper in 1895. She parlayed that into a job with the World, doing a column called The New Woman. “I am a journalist and ‘a new woman,’” she wrote, “if that term means that I believe I can do anything that any man can do.”

She hit the lecture circuit, spinning tales of her adventures in India (tiger hunting with German royalty! mistaken for a demon!), Japan (fell through a frozen river! took a bullet! did a stint in prison!), and Siberia (“observed the workings of the Russian system of treating political prisoners” — scary!). As you might imagine, she held audiences spellbound. “She has a degree of self-assurance somewhat unusual to her sex,” the San Francisco Chronicle reported. Zheutlin, her biographer and relative, found that she’d embroidered her own adventures just a smidge.

Now, you could argue that Kopchovsky was a crappy role model. She abandoned her family to undertake this quest. She embellished her stories to gain the 19th century equivalent of clicks, eyeballs and page views. But then again, she left Boston a poor woman and came home rich enough to buy her family a house in the (then upscale) Bronx. She was clever enough to tap into the zeitgeist, with its interest in around-the-world travel and questions about whether women were inherently weaker than men. To me, she’s a great exemplar of the fact that there are many ways to be a Jewish mother. Kopchovsky took on her biking challenge to support her family, but she also did it for the adventure. She embodies the notion that mothers are entitled to value our own dreams and independence.

I’m also super-obsessed with Glückel of Hameln, mentioned in my last missive to you. This late-17th/early 18th-century diarist was widowed in her early 40s, with a passel of children. She took up journaling to “stifle and banish the melancholic thoughts which came to me during many sleepless nights.” (Who among us cannot relate?) She not only took over but also expanded her late husband’s import-export business – her diaries were full of glee about wheeling and dealing on the markets. But she also devoted a lot of her thoughts to moral lessons she hoped to impart to her kids, the moral importance of education and ethical business dealings, gossip about her community and worries about her kids’ futures. (Seventeenth Century Merchants: They’re Just Like Us!) It’s clear from her diaries that she viewed her kids as individuals, with different strengths and weaknesses. 

Glückel and Annie were both abundantly imperfect, which is an important lesson too. It’s not only fine, but desirable, to be a good-enough mother (to use a phrase coined by goyish psychiatrist Donald Winnicott) instead of a perfect mother. Not perpetually hovering and rescuing your children helps them learn independence, creativity and resilience… qualities that have served the Jewish people well throughout our history.

The Mamaleh exchange, part 3: On a couple of all-time great Jewish mothers Read More »

The UN Venue is all wrong – but it isn’t anti-Israel

I offer five important documents and statement that I believe every member of the Jewish community ought to read, as well as statements from the State of Israel and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the American Jewish Committee, the ADL, etc. relative to UN Security Council Resolution 2334.

Three of the following come from liberal and progressive pro-Israel American Zionist Organizations. The other two include the full text of UNSC Resolution 2334 and a review of the history of US abstentions and vetoes in the UN on resolutions critical of Israeli policies and of the State of Israel.

[1] Full Text of UN Security Council Condemnation of Israel, Resolution … http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/full-text-of-un-security-council-condemnation-of-israel-resolution-2334/2016/12/24/

[2] ARZA’s statement on UNSC Resolution 2334
http://www.arza.org/blog/post/arza-response-to-un-security-council-resolution-2334

The Association of Reform Zionists of America is the Zionist organization of America’s 1.5 million Reform Jews. (Note: I serve as ARZA national chair)

[3] T'ruah Statement on UN Security Council Resolution – truah.org/…/805-t-ruah-statement-on-un-security-council-resolution.html

T’ruah – The Rabbinic Call for Human Rights includes American rabbis from across the religious streams.

[4] J Street Welcomes US Abstention on UNSC Resolution – J Street: The … jstreet.org/press-releases/j-street-welcomes-us-abstention-unsc-resolution/

J Street is a pro-Israel pro-peace political and educational organization in Washington, D.C. and is the largest pro-Israel PAC in America. It has a large and growing university contingent called J Street U which is recognized by the Jewish Federations of America and the State of Israel as one of the most effective voices on college campuses against the Boycott, Divestiture, and Sanctions Movement (BDS).

[5] “Abstaining from history – Here’s all the UN Resolutions on Israel the United States Abstained on” – by Seth J. Frantzman
https://sethfrantzman.com/2016/12/24/abstaining-from-history-heres-all-the-un-resolutions-on-israel-the-us-abstained-on/

The UN Venue is all wrong – but it isn’t anti-Israel Read More »

Insights from the Road: Business Insider and Lisa Niver

Thank you ” target=”_blank”>second article!

A woman who went backpacking for 11 months explains how to pack light

lisa backpackLisa Niver of We Said Go Travel. ” rel=”nofollow”>We Said Go Travel, a travel website that hosts 1,600 travel writers in 75 countries,  

“Be prepared for everything to break or get ruined,” she said. “I broke a computer, a hard drive, and several cameras. Being on the road is really hard on electronics.”

lisa climb Read the original article on “>Facebook. Copyright 2016. Follow INSIDER on Read the ” target=”_blank”>Business Insider.

See it on  

Insights from the Road: Business Insider and Lisa Niver Read More »

John Kerry lays out 6 principles for Mideast peace, rips Israel’s ‘pernicious’ settlement policy

Secretary of State John Kerry laid out six principles that the United States believes must govern the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict while rebuking Israel’s “pernicious policy of settlement construction.”

In lengthy remarks from the State Department in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday, Kerry said peace must provide for secure and recognized borders based on the 1967 lines, with mutually agreed land swaps and a contiguous state for the Palestinians.

Other principles included the fulfillment of U.N. General Assembly Resolution 181, which called for two state for two peoples; a fair and “realistic” solution to the Palestinian refugee problem that did not “affect the fundamental character of Israel”; shared capitals in Jerusalem that ensured free access to holy sites and no redivision of the city; Israeli security guarantees along with an end to the occupation; and a final end to the conflict and all outstanding claims along with the establishment of normalized relations.

“The two-state solution is the only way to achieve a just and lasting peace between Israel and the Palestinians,” Kerry said. “It is the only way to ensure Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state living in peace and security with its neighbors. It is the only way to ensure a future of freedom and dignity for the Palestinian people, and it is an important way of advancing United States interests in the region.”

Kerry’s speech came with just weeks left in the Obama administration and in the wake of a controversial U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Israeli settlements that the United States declined to veto, prompting unusually harsh criticism from Israeli officials. The speech included a firm defense of the U.S. abstention, which Kerry described as motivated by mounting American concern that the two-state solution was growing ever more imperiled by Israeli settlement activity.

“Despite our best efforts over the years, the two-state solution is now in serious jeopardy,” Kerry said. “The truth is that trends on the ground — violence, terrorism, incitement, settlement expansion and the seemingly endless occupation — are combining to destroy hopes for peace on both sides and increasingly cementing an irreversible one-state reality that most people do not actually want.”

Speaking directly to Israeli criticism of the U.S. abstention, Kerry said, “It is not this resolution that is isolating Israel, it is the pernicious policy of settlement construction that is making peace impossible.”

Kerry dwelled at length on Israeli settlement policy in the West Bank, charging leaders of the settlement movement with “purposefully accelerating” trends that will make a two-state solution impossible. Kerry noted that the Israeli settler population has grown by 270,000 since Obama took office in 2009 and he lamented the reversal of trends toward greater Palestinian control initiated with the 1993 Oslo Accords.

“The Israeli prime minister publicly supports a two-state solution, but his current coalition is the most right-wing in Israel’s history, with an agenda driven by the most extreme elements,” Kerry said. “Policies of this government, which the prime minister just described as more committed to settlements than any in Israel’s history, are leading in the opposite direction. They’re leading to one state.”

Kerry also had harsh words for the Palestinians, condemning their incitement to violence and glorification of terrorists, and he slammed the attempt to isolate and delegitimize Israel in the United Nations and elsewhere.

“The murders of innocents are still glorified on Fatah websites,” Kerry said, referring to the political faction headed by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. “Despite statements by President Abbas, too often they send a different message by failing to condemn specific attacks and by naming public squares, streets and schools after terrorists.”

But Kerry reserved the bulk of criticism for Israeli settlements, portraying them as obstacles to peace and counter to Israeli interests, even as he acknowledged that they are neither the sole nor the prime reason the conflict endures. Kerry also lashed out at recent Israeli legislation aimed at legalizing settler outposts built deep in the West Bank.

In the face of intense criticism from Israeli leaders and some pro-Israel voices in the United States, Kerry also emphasized the abiding American support for Israeli security going back decades and reiterated Obama’s pro-Israel bona fides, noting the unprecedented American military assistance for Israel and the administration’s opposition to attempts to isolate Israel in international forums.

“This administration has been Israel’s greatest friend and supporter,” Kerry said. “No American administration has done more for Israel’s security than Barack Obama’s.”

John Kerry lays out 6 principles for Mideast peace, rips Israel’s ‘pernicious’ settlement policy Read More »

Netanyahu ‘deeply disappointed’ in Kerry’s speech, rejects UN vote

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected a policy speech by Secretary of State John Kerry, saying the emphasis by the United Nations and the Obama administration on settlement construction downplayed the role of Palestinian repudiation of Israel’s legitimacy as an obstacle to peace.

“How can you make peace with someone who rejects your very existence?” Netanyahu said in a speech Wednesday barely an hour after Kerry spoke in Washington, D.C. “This conflict is not about houses in Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria, Gaza or anywhere else. This conflict has always been about Israel’s very right to exist.”

Kerry in his lengthy remarks at the State Department defended the U.S. abstention on a U.N. Security Council resolution Friday that condemned Israeli settlement construction.

He also defended the Obama administration’s support for Israel and laid out six principles to guide future Israel-Palestinian peace talks. The principles included two states with secure recognized borders, and a fair and “realistic” solution to the Palestinian refugee problem that did not “affect the fundamental character of Israel.”

“It is not this resolution that is isolating Israel,” Kerry said, referring to the Security Council vote. “It is the pernicious policy of settlement construction that is making peace impossible.”

Netanyahu said Israelis were “deeply disappointed” in Kerry’s speech and said the focus on settlements is misplaced, as Israel is the only stable democracy in a chaotic region.

“The whole Middle East is going up in flames, full states are collapsing, terror is spreading,” he said. “And for an hour, the secretary of state is attacking the only democracy in the Middle East, that guards stability in the Middle East.”

Netanyahu reiterated his stance that the only way to reach Israeli-Palestinian peace is through direct negotiations between the Palestinian Authority and Israel. He also reiterated the accusation that the United States engineered the passage of the Security Council resolution, despite repeated denials from Washington, and called on the Obama administration to block any further attempts to condemn Israel at the U.N.

“We have it on absolute, incontestable evidence that the United States organized, advanced and brought this resolution to the United Nations Security Council,” Netanyahu said. “I think the United States, if it’s true to its word, should now come out and say, ‘We will not allow any more resolutions in the Security Council on Israel, period.'”

President-elect Donald Trump opposed the Security Council resolution, and Netanyahu said Wednesday that “Israel looks forward to working with President-elect Donald Trump and with the American Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, to mitigate the damage this resolution has done, and ultimately to repeal it.”

Netanyahu ‘deeply disappointed’ in Kerry’s speech, rejects UN vote Read More »

A Moment in Time: Whose Shoes are you Filling?

Dear all,

There is a Jewish story about a guy named Zusia. Zusia was a good guy, a real mench. His entire life, he aspired to be as giving as Abraham, as visionary as Moses, and as wise as Solomon.

One day, Zusia dreamed that he met God. God said, “I have one question for you, Zusia.”

Zusia said, “I know what it is. You want to know why I could not be more like Abraham.”

“No,” God responded. That's not it.

Zusia continued, “Then You must want to know why I was not more like Moses?”

“No,” God answered again.

Zusia finally said, “Then You must be wondering: why I was not more like Solomon?”

“No,” God said…. “I want to know only this: Why were you not more like Zusia?”


Friends, so often we spend our days aspiring to be like others.

And there are times when someone might even say to us, “You have big shoes to fill.”

But here's the key to life: The only shoes you have to fill are your own. Now, this does not mean we shouldn't try to grow and make ourselves better. But it does mean we shouldn't pretend to be someone we are not. Just be yourself.

Today – as we enter the secular new year, we keep ourselves in check once again. This is our moment in time to become the best person we can be. So go out, fill your shoes, and walk into tomorrow!

With love and Shalom,


Rabbi Zach Shapiro

A Moment in Time: Whose Shoes are you Filling? Read More »

Kerry questions how much longer U.S. can support Israel under status quo

This story originally appeared on jewishinsider.com.

A

fter years of built-up personal frustration, Secretary of State John Kerry issued a lengthy critique of Israeli and Palestinian leaders during a speech at the State Department on Dec. 28, a mere 23 days before leaving office. 

Assailing the current status quo, America’s top diplomat emphasized, “If the choice is one state, Israel can either be Jewish or democratic, it cannot be both and it will not ever live in peace.” 

In the speech, Kerry criticized Palestinian actions as well. “The murderers of innocents are still glorified on Fatah websites, including showing attackers next to Palestinian leaders following attacks,” Kerry noted.

Kerry has invested hundreds of hours mediating between the parties and responded somewhat defensively to criticism from Israeli leaders and members of Congress in recent days during the 70-minute address. 

“They fail to recognize that this friend, the United States of America, that has done more to support Israel than any other country, this friend that has blocked countless efforts to delegitimize Israel, cannot be true to our own values — or even the stated democratic values of Israel — and we cannot properly defend and protect Israel if we allow a viable two-state solution to be destroyed before our own eyes,” he said.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a response carried live by CNN, blasted Kerry’s speech as a “big disappointment” while calling the focus on settlements as “obsessive.” “Israelis do not need to be lectured about the importance of peace by world leaders,” Netanyahu declared. 

Netanyahu accused the outgoing secretary of state of paying “lip service to the unremitting campaign of terrorism that has been waged by the Palestinians against the Jewish state for nearly a century.”

From Ramallah, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas reiterated past comments that he would be ready to begin negotiations if Israel were to freeze settlement construction and referenced United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334, adopted Dec. 23, condemning Israeli settlements.

“The speech was replete with paternalistic, arrogant lecturing,” Abraham Foxman, former national director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), told Jewish Insider. “The threats to peace and the implementation of a two-state solution are not Israeli settlements, but the non-recognition of Israel as a Jewish state, Palestinian incitement and violence.”

Incoming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) also criticized Kerry for focusing on the settlements while ignoring the fact that Hamas continued launching rockets into Israel after Israel forced settlers to withdraw from all settlements in the Gaza Strip. 

Others recommended Israelis take a hard look at the substance of the secretary of state’s remarks.

“It’s an important speech for those who support the two-state solution and do not want to see Israel’s Jewish and democratic nature being undermined,” Dan Arbell, former deputy chief of Israel’s embassy in Washington, D.C., told Jewish Insider. 

Hussein Ibish, a senior scholar at the Arab Gulf Institute in Washington, said, “I think it’s probably the most sympathetic (speech) to the Palestinian cause given by a major American official.” However, Ibish found the timing of the speech problematic. The address “could have been really meaningful if it had been given two or three years ago and backed up with actual policies with real consequences. But at this point, with a couple of weeks left, it’s almost pointless.”

President-elect Donald Trump indicated last week that he will indeed look to make up for the damage done by the outgoing administration over the weekend. “We cannot continue to let Israel be treated with such total disdain and disrespect. They used to have a great friend in the U.S., but not anymore,” Trump tweeted hours before Kerry’s speech. “Stay strong Israel, January 20th is fast approaching!”

Kerry questions how much longer U.S. can support Israel under status quo Read More »