fbpx

November 18, 2016

Walking mountains, shabbat and the Buddha

It is well known that the institution of Shabbat is one of the best inventions God ever came up with. It no doubt qualifies Him to receive the Nobel Prize for innovative thinking, and the venerable judges in Sweden should sincerely consider bestowing this honor on the Lord of the Universe. Now that most of the world has adopted the concept of a weekly day of rest, the time has come to act. The idea is nearly 6,000 years old; a Nobel Prize is long overdue. 

That we all need a weekly rest is common knowledge. What is much less known is that the Jewish tradition believes such rest should not only consist of refraining from strenuous labor, but also from any kind of work that presents human beings as having dominion over the world. One day a week we are asked to return the world and all its potential to God and, instead of being creators, acknowledge that we are also creatures in God’s eyes – not much different from a flower, a leaf, or a small bird. By refraining from cooking, writing, creating electricity, driving cars, flying airplanes, and other such activities, we learn that the world has already been created and will no doubt survive without us. As Abraham Joshua Heschel pointed out, “The world has our hands, but our soul belongs to Someone Else.” (Abraham Joshua Heschel, The Sabbath (Farrar Straus Giroux, July 2005), p. 13)

Shabbat is a day when we stop worshipping technology, money, and power. Instead, we focus on our internal lives and our families – learning Torah, singing songs, and creating an inner palace of tranquility. Shabbat is holiness in time, when we allow for personal conversations with friends, reading a book, playing games with our children, and ungluing ourselves from the cell phone, iPad and computer. Shabbat means living in full liberty, which is paradoxically achieved by heeding prohibitions. We free ourselves from all sorts of activities that often disturb our internal balance. What can be greater than abandoning the cell phone and suddenly discovering that we have a spouse and children? We find an island of stillness in a turbulent sea of worldliness.   

Yet there is one law that, while rarely applicable in Israel and large Jewish communities around the world, really sums up the whole message of this remarkable day: the prohibition against carrying any object in the public domain, besides our clothing and jewelry. Today, many cities are surrounded by an eruv (*), so as to permit people to carry some of their items for reasons of convenience. But it is really this prohibition against carrying that captures the essence of the Shabbat rest, and it is a pity that its message has been nearly forgotten. What is the secret behind this law?

The Buddha (c. 560-480 BCE) and Master Furong Daokai (12th century, China), both great Eastern philosophers, really hit the nail on the head when they made the following remarkable observation: “The green mountains are always walking…If you doubt mountains’ walking, you do not know your own walking.” (See: Sutra on the Establishment of Mindfulness, or Satipatthana Sutta. I thank Prof. Yehudah Gellman of Yerushalayim for bringing this to my attention.) 

What did they mean?

There are two reasons for walking – one is to reach a destination, and the other is for the sake of strolling (le-tayel in Hebrew; spazieren in German). When someone walks to something, their goal is outside themselves: they have to be at a business meeting, or need to bring a package to a specific place. But when people take a stroll, the walking itself is the goal. It is not a means but das ding an sich, the thing itself. Every step is its purpose. At such a moment, people are connected with their very being. They are walking with themselves in peace and in complete harmony. They carry only themselves. 

Green mountains walk in the sense that they, in an existential way, stroll with themselves. They need not do anything but be mountains. Nothing outside themselves disturbs them in being mountains. They need not go anywhere; therefore they just stroll.

People must know how to carry themselves. They should know that their inner being is the goal of their life. It is their internal life that needs to spiritually and morally grow. Their happiness depends not on outside circumstances but on their attitude toward those conditions. The rare and simple pleasure of being themselves will compensate for all their misery. If they meet their family or friends, they will not want to own them as objects but rather relate to them in a mode in which they stroll with them, accompanying them while spiritually growing. They realize that being is becoming.

No longer is the goal of life about obtaining an object, or being somewhere for the sake of proving oneself, achieving external goals, or making money. They refuse to be the slaves of their own inventions, whether it is their car, computer, or cell phone. What one acquires on Shabbat is a way of life that brings the joy of tranquility or, as Spinoza calls it—sub specie aeternitatis – a perspective of eternity. 

When we are told not to carry in the public domain on Shabbat, we are essentially being asked not to see our life goals in the public sphere, where life is about getting somewhere. While for livelihood one no doubt needs to go places, that activity remains a weekday endeavor; a means to something, but never das ding an sich

On Shabbat we turn our outer mode into a being mode, and for one day a week we become people who by just carrying ourselves, and nothing else, are able to deal with a world that has little knowledge of the soul’s needs. On Shabbat, we stroll even when we go to synagogue. Only then will we realize how great we are and that nobody can make us inferior without our own consent. 

In a world where we refuse to take notice of what is beyond our sight, where we turn mysteries into dogmas and facts, ideas into a multitude of words and routine, we Jews are asked to surpass ourselves by being ourselves; we are summoned to discover another world. 

Refraining from carrying is an act of protest against the shallowness of our world. And while today we are permitted to carry outside our homes if an eruv is in place, we should never forget the great symbolic meaning inherent in the prohibition against carrying on Shabbat, which can advance us – both spiritually and morally – further than anything else. 

Our society stands on the precipice, and one false step can plunge us into the abyss. We have, for the most part, become a civilization of notoriously unhappy people – lonely, anxious, depressed, destructive, and dependent – people who are glad to kill time that they are trying so hard to save. 

Shabbat is a day of truce in the midst of the human battle with the world. It teaches us that even pulling out a blade of grass is a breach of harmony, as is lighting a match. And while we need to carry objects on weekdays, so as to physically survive, one day in the week we are taught that what really counts is our ability to carry our own selves. Shabbat teaches us that the survival of the human race depends on a radical change of the human heart. 

The time has come for all of humankind to observe Shabbat – whether on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday. The Lord of the Universe has told us to do so, and we Jews owe it to our fellow human beings. 

Walking mountains, shabbat and the Buddha Read More »

We never give up hope

As this week’s portion begins, Abraham is visited by three men. Our rabbis tell us these were messengers of God sent to heal him from his circumcision, to prophesy that the barren Sarah would give birth to a son in a year, and to proceed to Sodom and Gomorrah to implement the final destruction of those epicenters of evil.

As the visitors tell Abraham that he and Sarah will have their long-awaited son when he reaches age 100 and she 90, the question is raised: Having reached this age when Sarah’s body no longer experiences the monthly way of women, and with her husband as old as he is, is she really going to have a baby now?

The baby, Isaac, is born a year later. He inherits the family destiny and grows up to be the second of our three patriarchs.

Life is about many hopes and many lost hopes. We are blessed that we can face challenges and disaster and still hope. People face disease. Some cannot make ends meet financially. Good jobs are hard to come by, and sometimes the best of jobs are lost. People in midlife sometimes unexpectedly find themselves single and want so much to marry, to find an honest and true life partner, but each lead turns up empty — and no one seems to care (because, typically, no one else does).

So we hope tomorrow will be better. A change of fortune or circumstances is just around the corner — my next job application and interview, the new doctor and the new medicine, the new social introduction and date. We burst with so much new hope. And then, again, we are brought back to terra firma, disappointed, another lead that failed to pan out.

At some point, every so often, nagging doubts tug at our hearts: “Are we kidding ourselves?  Maybe it never is going to get better. I never will find a decent job. I am going to die alone.”  These moments are experienced, in one fashion or another, by all of us. “Having reached this age … am I really going to have a baby now?”

If there is one overriding theme in Jewish history and peoplehood, perhaps our greatest secret to survival and success, it is that we never give up. We never lose hope. For Sarah and Abraham, the challenge was whether they ever would have a son. By the end of the parsha, with that boy now grown to age 37, the new concern became whether they would lose that son all too soon.

In different forms and shapes, that concern touches many parents, and I am approached all too often by parents from around the country: “Rabbi, our child has departed from the path of Torah.  We have tried everything, and we just don’t know what else to do.”

Here is what I share: As long as your child is alive, there is hope. People do sometimes depart from our path, and some come back. I have seen it often. Perhaps your child will connect with a spouse whose own commitment to Judaism will point the way back. As long as there is life, there is hope.  

Whether it is a Jewish nation standing at the Sea of Reeds with a massive Egyptian army approaching, or a terrified Jewish population in Judea’s capital facing the prospect of a massacre the next day by Sennacherib’s massed armies, we never give up. How are we going to get through the waters? We don’t know. What will we do tomorrow when the Assyrians attack Jerusalem? We don’t know. 

We just pray three times a day. We do our best. And we never give up.  

As our Torah portion ends this week, Isaac asks his father, as they walk toward Mount Moriah, ostensibly to offer an animal sacrifice to God: “I see the fire and wood, but where is the animal for the sacrifice?” (Genesis 22:7). Abraham, who thinks he is commanded to offer his son as the sacrifice, responds that he does not know: “God will make the animal seen.” In other words, “I have no answer. I don’t know. But I never stop hoping and believing that, when the time is propitious according to His plan, He will show us the solution.”  

When the time comes, there is the ram, stuck in the bulrushes, there is the parting of the Reed Sea. Sometimes it is a miracle of biblical proportions, sometimes a surprise callback for a job interview, an unexpected check in the mail, or finally, a person to marry and enjoy for the rest of one’s life as a best friend.

We never give up hope.


Rabbi Dov Fischer, adjunct professor of law at Loyola Law School and at UC Irvine School of Law, is a columnist for several online magazines and is rabbi of Young Israel of Orange County. His writings appear at rabbidov.com.

We never give up hope Read More »

7 Haiku for Parsha Vayeira Where Someone Becomes a Condiment

I
When the Holy One
says a baby is coming
you better not laugh.

II
How many righteous
people will save a city?
Who has this power?

III
Angels make angry
locals go blind. It’s not called
Sodom for nothing.

IV
Go ahead. If you
want to be a condiment
disobey the One.

V
The story of two
brothers. One cherished, and one
sent to the desert.

VI
A deal is made for
three generations of peace.
We can learn from that.

VII
Give your son to Me
on the mountain. Abraham
does right or wrong here?

7 Haiku for Parsha Vayeira Where Someone Becomes a Condiment Read More »

Liberal wailing over the Western Wall

Liberal Jews (mostly American or American-born) have been escalating their protests against Israel’s unequal treatment of non-Orthodox worship at Judaism’s holiest site, the Western Wall in Jerusalem. They want the architecture of the Kotel (the site’s Hebrew name) to greatly expand a marginal section where heterodox, egalitarian worship has been permitted. Israel’s more traditional sector has fiercely defended the holiness of the site from those who want both styles of worship equally validated.

But other than monthly worship services doubling as political demonstrations, liberal Jews don’t pray much at the Kotel. The designated Robinson’s Arch area has only attracted a trickle of non-Orthodox Jews, and the typical Kotel tourist has encountered the site with all its historic traditions – as is appropriate. But the protesters are now essentially demanding the Kotel they rarely attend resemble their own synagogues they rarely attend.

And that’s not fair.

The conflict is a flashpoint between Americans affiliated with the liberal Reform and Conservative movements and Israelis who – while mostly secular – tend to cede religious matters to the Orthodox. The non-Orthodox religious presence in Israel – as elsewhere outside North America – is slight. When non-observant Jews in the other continents pray or celebrate a lifecycle event, they generally choose Orthodox rites. (That’s my own approach.) In 2016, the heterodox movements are an overwhelmingly American phenomenon.

Thousands of Orthodox worshippers flood the site for prayer services three times a day, every day. At certain holidays, the crush of Orthodox Jews can top 10,000. Yet the sporadic Reform and Conservative participants, many of them tourists, want one-third of the refurbished Wall area to follow their rules. Perhaps if they started attending at a third or even a tenth the Orthodox rate, there would be something to talk about.

A thought experiment:

Many small Jewish communities in North America have but one congregation. Let’s say ten Orthodox families move to Butte, Montana and began attending Congregation B’nai Israel (Reform), or arrive in Waterlook Iowa and join Sons of Jacob (Conservative). What else could they do, with no other choice of house of worship?

Soon, they demand changes. Fire the woman rabbi and hire a man, they said. Construct a mechitza (divider) to separate worshippers by gender. All future minyanim (prayer quorums) should count only men.

The minority of observant Jews in those congregations would be showing real chutzpah to expect the larger congregation to adapt. Unless the Orthodox membership began to dominate numerically, change would be inappropriate.

The sole fact Reform and Conservative Jews exist, praying rarely (if at all) at both the Kotel and their own synagogues, does not give them a claim on a site that has never operated with their customs. If they want a say in its governance, let them show up – and not once a month or on tourist missions.

But the Kotel is our heritage, too, non-Orthodox Jews retort. Well, guess what? Orthodox Jewish prayer (also known as Jewish prayer) is another part of your heritage. And Reform and Conservative Judaism don’t forbid participation in services that strictly follow Jewish law.

At heart, the Kotel controversy is about Jewish identity. Liberal Jews want Israel – and Orthodox Jews everywhere – to declare them equally Jewish. Regarding personal status, that’s true – the majority of Reform and Conservative Jews (the ones with Jewish mothers) are 100 percent Jewish. But regarding practices that diverge from normative Jewish law, not every custom a set of Jews observes is a Jewish custom. The Jewish people have a set of obligations known as halacha (Jewish law) not subject to tinkering by those who don’t respect it.

Many of the same American Jews who trumpet Israel’s democracy when discussing the Middle East conflict quickly turn anti-democratic when discussing Kotel governance. Sometimes, they even threaten to stop supporting Israel altogether if the country doesn’t kowtow to their tantrum over a site they rarely visit.

Worshippers at the Kotel deserve the loudest voice in determining the site’s future, with Israeli citizens also contributing to the discussion. American Jews don’t even belong at the table, although the moment they commit to living in Israel they deserve equal input.

The timing of this latest push couldn’t be worse for Israel, which is fighting a resolution by a United Nations agency whitewashing the Jewish historical claim to the Western Wall. Israel would be foolish if, while highlighting millennia of prayers at the Kotel that follow Jewish tradition, it introduces prayers at the Kotel that don’t follow Jewish tradition.

As Israel defends the Kotel’s very Jewishness, liberal Jews who demand space at the Wall to, well, not pray seem petty and selfish. Their demands should be rejected.


David Benkof is Senior Political Analyst at the Daily Caller, where this essay first appeared. Follow him on Twitter (@DavidBenkof) or E-mail him at DavidBenkof@gmail.com.

Liberal wailing over the Western Wall Read More »

Poem: The Wadi

Just as the souls
departed my body
while I lay by you,
it bleeds, staccato,
on the desert:
Almost stream, almost
tributary, almost union.
Now when I kneel
where you were,
I trace the ribs
of deceased wavelets.
I taste the flow of sand,
water-broken stones,
the swollen litanies of two
seasons apart,
your dry nectar
of plenty.


From “Dry Nectars of Plenty” (Headwaters Press, 2002), which co-won BigCitLit.com’s Chapbook contest. Baruch November founded an organization to cultivate the arts called Jewish Advocacy for Culture & Knowledge, and teaches creative writing and literature at Touro College in New York.

Poem: The Wadi Read More »

The road of Israeli health tech to the U.S. market

Los Angeles is estimated to be home to roughly triple or even quadruple the number of Israelis as the Bay Area. When it comes to technology start-ups, however, there is barely even a comparison.  

The Bay Area, according to the non-profit Israeli Executives and Founders Forum (IEFF), is home to over 125 Israeli tech start-ups, as well as roughly half-dozen Israeli investment vehicles, incubators, and accelerators.  By the estimate of Yair Grindlinger, an entrepreneur who has led several Israeli companies that relocated to the Bay Area as they grew, IEFF may only be counting a third to a quarter of the actual total, meaning more like 400-500 Israeli tech start-ups in Northern California.

Los Angeles?  Well, there’s no comparable organization to IEFF, but my research for this article suggested that you would be hard-pressed to identify more than a handful of Israeli start-ups who have relocated here.  

Why have Israeli tech companies flocked to the Bay Area and more or less avoided Los Angeles?  The obvious answer is funding:  of the roughly $4 billion spent annually in trade between California and Israel, the overwhelming majority has been sourced from Silicon Valley and San Francisco-based investors into Israeli technology.  

This should surprise no one, given that the Bay Area predominates in tech investment nationally – not just levels of tech funding, but in terms of track records, focus, and access to talent.  In the world of healthcare technology investing where I work, by contrast, Los Angeles trails not only the Bay Area, but also New York, Chicago, and Boston.

If that’s the case, why am I – a L.A.-based healthcare lawyer and investor – coming to Israel to plug L.A. as a destination for digital health startups?  I suspect it’s the same reason that American Friends of Tel Aviv University organize their annual entertainment and health technology IDEAS conference in Los Angeles.  And that the Israel Conference, now in its eighth year, chooses L.A. as the venue to showcase Israeli technology.  It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that L.A. has enormous untapped potential to invest in and support Israeli technology.

It’s not just about the substantial population of Israelis already here or a large L.A. Jewish community friendly towards Israeli tech and interested in impact investment.  Even beyond Israeli technology, Los Angeles has significant undeveloped potential to be a hub of technology and, closer to my world, for bioscience and digital health. Government and industry groups in Southern California keep scratching their heads in dismay at the fact that, despite its many advantages – good weather, a well-educated talent pool, ample local investment capital, an enormous local marketplace to pilot and test ideas, and a concentration of major academic research centers like UCLA and USC, L.A. continues to be a “leaky bucket” in health tech – losing entrepreneurs to other parts of the country – rather than a destination.

Many of us are betting that something is about to give.  Local government seems increasingly interested in supporting economic development in and around greater Los Angeles to encourage a more business-friendly climate for innovation and entrepreneurship.  (Similar efforts have shown promise in San Diego as well.)

Together with a group of healthcare business leaders, I recently launched a new investment vehicle, the Adaptive Healthcare Fund, with the belief that funding is part of the equation in moving the needle and catalyzing early-stage healthcare innovation in Los Angeles.  While we are looking to support local Southern California innovation and entrepreneurs, we’re also betting that a key part of the recipe for success will involve persuading Israeli entrepreneurs (and potentially entrepreneurs in other significant, non-U.S. health technology hubs, like India) to come to L.A. I’m in Israel this week to meet with start-ups, venture capitalists, and Israeli service providers, precisely to see whether we can work to bring the promising Israeli health tech start-ups to L.A.  Their growth will almost certain require a base of operations somewhere in the U.S., so why not consider L.A. as an alternative?

Smart investment capital is only part of the equation.  From the perspective of entrepreneurs, the complaint is that, notwithstanding the beautiful weather, Los Angeles is expensive and has a thinner talent pool of programmers.  

But that’s changing.  In the past several years, Google and other Bay Area tech giants have invested in building a large presence in L.A. As pricey as L.A. is, the inflation and crowding in Silicon Valley and San Francisco have actually made L.A. more attractive.  L.A.’s Silicon Beach tech scene may be a drop in the bucket compared to the Bay Area but, in fairness, it took four decades and the birth of giants like Google, Apple, and Facebook for Northern California to earn its reputation as the tech innovation hub. Los Angeles is at a much earlier phase, but is showing promise. The key is developing investor interest in nurturing and sustaining that growth.

Will Los Angeles become next hub for Israeli digital healthcare innovation and other Israeli tech start-ups?  Stay tuned.  The flight to L.A. may be a few hours longer than New York or Boston, but I wouldn’t bet against the appeal of Southern California.  As my wife Dorit promised me when she pitched me on moving here fifteen years ago, “You have to love L.A.  If you don’t, just wait a week and it will reinvent itself.”


Harry Nelson is a healthcare regulatory attorney in Los Angeles and the co-chair of the investment committee Adaptive Healthcare, a healthcare investment fund.  He advises clients on healthcare and life sciences regulatory compliance and business strategy.

The road of Israeli health tech to the U.S. market Read More »

Hebrew Word of the Week: shafel/shafal

A word may develop two opposite, or quite different, meanings, as the English word “nice,” which once meant “stupid, ignorant,” but which currently means “pleasant, agreeable, polite.” Similarly, in Hebrew, shafel has developed a variety of meanings, from a physical “low” to the abstract “base, mean, despicable.”

Some biblical nuances: nivzim ushfalim “nasty and despicable” (Malachi 2:9); shafal “low standing; person of little value” (Psalms 138:6); shfal-ruaH “humble” (Proverbs 29:23); shfal anashim “(God may set as a ruler) the humblest (perhaps sometimes the most despicable?) of men” (Daniel 4:14). 

Modern uses: shiflut “meanness”; shefel kalkali “economic depression”; shefel ba-‘asaqim “business downturn”; shefel ha-madregah “the lowest rung, the worst situation”; hishpil “to humiliate; insult, put to shame”; hashpalah “putting to shame, humbling”*; mashpil “humiliating, insulting.”

Arabic cognates are safil, sufli “hooligan, hoodlum”; in Yiddish, shofel “worth little, common.”

*As (God) is able to humble (hashpalah) those who behave arrogantly” (Daniel 4:34).


Yona Sabar is a professor of Hebrew and Aramaic in the department of Near Eastern Languages & Cultures at UCLA.

Hebrew Word of the Week: shafel/shafal Read More »

Moving and Shaking: LAMOTH fundraiser, Hummus Festival, Israel-Asia Community Summit and more

About 600 supporters of the Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust (LAMOTH) attended its annual fundraiser Nov. 6 at the Beverly Wilshire hotel, which honored deceased Holocaust survivor Jona Goldrich and film producer Gary Foster for his film “Denial.”

Historian Deborah Lipstadt — the Dorot Professor of Modern Jewish History and Holocaust Studies at Emory University, and author of the book “History on Trial: My Day in Court With a Holocaust Denier,” upon which “Denial” is based — was the guest of honor and presented Foster with his award.

“When I learned that David Irving, the leading Holocaust denier, was suing me for libel, my first reaction was to laugh,” Lipstadt said. “This was a guy who claimed more people died in Sen. Ted Kennedy’s car at Chappaquiddick than in the Holocaust. But the burden of proof was on me to prove the truth of what I [wrote], and we did that. The man was left destroyed, and much of the foundation of hardcore Holocaust denial was destroyed too.”

In accepting his award, Foster said he was inspired to make a film about Holocaust denial after hearing Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, then president of Iran, publicly deny the Holocaust. Foster began researching the topic and happened upon Lipstadt and her book, “History on Trial,” pretty much by accident. Once he discovered Lipstadt, he said, he knew he had to turn her story into a movie.

Lipstadt said she was skeptical: “I told him, ‘I’m ready to sign [the film contract] but you’ve got to understand this story is about truth. This movie has got to be accurate.’ ”

From left: Israeli American Council Los Angeles co-chair Tamir Cohen, Beverly Hills Vice Mayor Nancy Krasne, Beverly Hills Recreation and Parks Commissioner Frances Bilak and Maya Kadosh, consul for public diplomacy, culture, media and public affairs at the Consulate General of Israel in Los Angeles served as judges at the Hummus Festival. Courtesy of the Consulate General of Israel in Los Angeles

Despite sporadic rainfall, nearly 300 individuals crowded the Beverly Hills Farmers’ Market on Oct. 30 for the inaugural Hummus Festival. The goal was to not only indulge in the popular Middle Eastern dipping sauce but to partake in Israeli food, music and the arts.

The event sponsors included the Consulate General of Israel in Los Angeles, City of Beverly Hills and the Israeli-American Council (IAC).

“This festival is a part of the historic partnership agreement signed last year between the Israeli government and the city of Beverly Hills to increase the cultural exchanges between Israel and the city, as well as offer locals exposure to rich Israeli food, Israeli music, the arts, film and music,” said Maya Kadosh, Israeli Consul for Public Diplomacy, Culture, Media and Public Affairs.

Kadosh and four local culinary experts were on hand to recognize the best-tasting hummus produced from among nearly a dozen local restaurants, food manufacturers and food trucks. It was a tie for first place between Rose Kemp and Rachid Rouhi.

“We thought Beverly Hills would be a natural fit for this event because of the large Jewish population and Israeli population in the city, and when you bring in food and culture to a place like the Farmers’ Market, it is a win-win situation for everyone,” said Dikla Kadosh, senior director for the IAC’s community center and events.

Young children at the festival took part in an Israeli dance competition and families enjoyed a band as well as DJ playing popular Israeli music. Also on hand for the event were local Israeli artists, jewelry makers, clothing vendors and even a booth offering visitors a virtual reality tour of Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, using the latest in high-tech Israeli electronic goggles.  

— Karmel Melamed, Contributing Writer


ryant@jewishjournal.com.

Moving and Shaking: LAMOTH fundraiser, Hummus Festival, Israel-Asia Community Summit and more Read More »

Wanderlust Series: What do Women think about Exotic Travels?

I enjoyed the Wanderlust Series by Hayo Magazine at One Roof Women in Culver City. The speakers shared their hopes, dreams, travels and experiences. I filmed ” rel=”noopener noreferrer nofollow” target=”_blank”>Hayo Magazine, will return again soon for another event.

Do you want to share your travel story? My Gratitude Travel Writing Award is now open and closed on Thanksgiving Day. ” target=”_blank”>What do Women think about Exotic Travels?

Traveling is the most rewarding action we can take in order to develop our own personalities. Traveling solo is an experience that you should have at least once in your lifetime, however, it can be as exciting as it can be terrifying. Women are exposed to different levels of precautions and many times the fear of traveling alone prevents them from going on solo adventures. This Wanderlust event is focused on courageous women that have dared to get out of their comfort zone to go on solo trips, debunk social stereotypes, open their minds to new adventures and build careers and businesses out of it.
 
The Wanderlust Series is created by ” rel=”noopener noreferrer nofollow” target=”_blank”>One Roof Women, a community for nurturing and inspiring women that are making in happen, Wanderlust is coming to Los Angeles with a stellar group of speakers. Kellee Edwards, Aida Mollenkamp, Shauna Nep and Heather Lilleston come from very different backgrounds and interests that will make this an interesting and rich conversation. Men: please join us as well. You should be as much part of the conversation as any other woman!

The Speakers

Kellee Edwards is a pilot, travel writer, scuba diver, vlogger at ” rel=”noopener noreferrer nofollow” target=”_blank”>Salt & Wind. She studied at the Cornell Hotel School and Le Cordon Bleu Paris before joining CHOW Magazine where she worked as Food Editor. From there she moved into television, hosting Ask Aida on the Food Network, Foodcrafters on the Cooking Channel, and In The Pantry on Yahoo! She published the book Key To The Kitchen and hosts the TasteMade series, Off Menu, where she travels in search of the best food a city has to offer.

Shauna Nep is currently the Senior Philanthropic Advisor at ” rel=”noopener noreferrer nofollow” target=”_blank”>Yoga for Bad People, a yoga-based company focused on leading retreats around the world and through that she has had the opportunity to experience and integrate other cultures into her practice.

Joanna Riquett is the founder and Editor In Chief of ” target=”_blank”>One Roof Women 8850 Washington Boulevard, Culver City, CA 90232

“>Hayo Magazine

More from Wanderlust Series: What do Women think about Exotic Travels? Read More »

Jewish artists’ intertwined roots, identity on display

“You have his nose,” said a man I’ve never met before, pointing to a photo of Theodor Herzl displayed on the wall. 

There he was: Herzl, with his dark eyes, his ridged forehead and, according to the man next to me, my nose. 

Herzl, the father of modern Zionism, an Austro-Hungarian Jew who conceived the notion of a Jewish state while living in the Diaspora — and just one of many panels making up “The German Roots of Zionism” exhibition now on display at Hillel at UCLA. 

A major point of this exhibition was to reflect on the relationship between German Jewish identity and contemporary American life, so maybe — just maybe — my schnoz was one more poetic link, connecting me to Zionism’s utopian roots. 

The exhibition was one of three being celebrated on Oct. 27 when 100 intellectuals gathered for the Triple Art Opening, held at the Dortort Center for Creativity in the Arts at UCLA Hillel. Organized in conjunction with one another by Perla Karney, UCLA Hillel’s artistic director, they will be on display until Dec. 9. 

“The German Roots of Zionism,” located on the second floor of Hillel at UCLA, was intended to give context to the two other exhibitions: “WINGS” by Harriet Zeitlin (located, not by accident, on the staircase leading up to the third floor) and “Seek My Face” by Joshua Meyer (on view in the Spiegel and Dortort galleries, located on the third floor). According to Karney, both Zeitlin and Meyer are products of the German Jewish identity.

These three separate yet intertwined exhibits chronicle the evolution of Jewish identity, starting with its Zionist roots, ascending up the staircase with “WINGS” and eventually landing on the contemporary works of Meyer. Although Meyer and Zeitlin are, stylistically speaking, polar opposites, there’s a sense of closeness and intimacy with both of their approaches.

Zeitlin is a scavenger of sorts, recycling found objects and transforming them into art. It’s especially apparent when ascending the staircase at UCLA Hillel, where her artwork lines the walls, that one man’s trash is this woman’s treasure. Her installation “WINGS” is a series of whimsical portraits that use appropriated objects such as clogs and shoehorns on the canvas. A shoehorn becomes the head of a bird mid-flight; a quilt becomes the wingspan. Her colors are vibrant and bold, stylistically resonant of Japanese cranes.

Although she doesn’t consider her art Jewish, per se, Zeitlin, a Jewish-American of Ashkenazi ancestry, told the Journal about her installation, “This is my reaction to nature. Nature is God and God is nature.”

As Zeitlin’s work is airy and whimsical, Meyer’s work is brooding and grounded. Meyer’s oil-on-canvases aren’t crisp like a photo; rather, they are more like a photo zoomed in too many times. The result is pixelation, with viscous slabs of paint. The difficulty to discern details in his portraits makes the title of the show, “Seek My Face” (after a line extracted from Psalm 27), very relevant. It’s worth mentioning that Meyer only paints people he knows personally, so these portraits are meditations on his own personal relationships.

Artist Ruth Weisberg, former dean of fine arts at the University of Southern California, spoke on Meyer’s behalf (since the Boston-based artist was unable to make the opening). An established artist herself, she told the Journal, “Even though our work might not resemble each other’s that much, we’re passionately interested in the history of art, we have similar enthusiasm for particular artists, and we are also both very involved Jewishly.” She said that what makes their art Jewish is that “we have a strong sense of that identity, the history, and how that’s affected us. Yes, we are Jewish artists in the very large, ample definition.” 

Rabbi Aaron Lerner, who is early in his tenure as Hillel’s rabbi, made sure to mention during the opening’s public program that the room where Meyer’s work is displayed is filled with 200 to 250 UCLA students on a typical Shabbat. In fact, all gallery areas at UCLA Hillel are public spaces. 

These works being a part of such a thriving community, rather than being limited to a gallery room, proves their relevance. They are part of the conversation, the social landscape. They decorate the walls, in rooms where we dwell, pulsing with conversation.

Jewish artists’ intertwined roots, identity on display Read More »