fbpx

July 25, 2016

Jewish Dems launch super PAC to counter RJC campaign

Jewish Democrats are set to launch a super PAC to fight the Republican Jewish Coalition’s multi-million dollar campaign among Jewish voters in battleground states across the nation, Jewish Insider has learned.

In remarks to Pennsylvania Democrats at a Monday morning delegation breakfast in Philadelphia, Marc Stanley, the immediate past chair of the National Jewish Democratic Council (NJDC), announced the formation of a super PAC named ‘Jews for Progress’ aimed to fight back against the RJC’s campaign.

“Sheldon Adelson and the Republican Jewish Coalition, and their allies, have pledged to spend $25 million to fight a war in eight swing states,” said Stanley. “You are going to see horrible signs like, ‘We can’t trust Hillary; she sold out American and Israel.’ It’s the only thing they can talk about. So Jews, we’ve got a super PAC called ‘Jews for Progress.’ We are going to fight that $25 million.”

“I am here just to tell you that help is on the way,” he said.

Jewish Dems launch super PAC to counter RJC campaign Read More »

Kaine hailed as strong supporter of Israel

Hillary Clinton’s selection of Virginia Senator Tim Kaine as her vice presidential candidate was hailed by Jewish leaders as a “smart” and “responsible” choice, given recent global events and the challenges facing the U.S. and abroad. 

Kaine, a member of the Senate’s Foreign Relations and Armed Services committees, has always maintained a warm and approachable relationship with the Greater Washington Jewish community, Ron Halber, JCRC of Greater Washington’s Executive Director, told Jewish Insider on Sunday. 

“He was close to the Jewish community when he was mayor of Richmond; he was closes to the statewide Jewish community once he became lieutenant governor, and he was very popular with the Jewish community when he became governor and continued as senator,” said Halber. 

“On the issues, Senator Kaine is very much aligned with Jewish values,” Greg Rosenbaum, chairman of the National Jewish Democratic Council, said in a statement. “He has fought for equal rights for everyone, has worked hard to reduce economic inequality, champions health coverage for all, supports comprehensive immigration reform and seeks to rein in senseless gun violence, all positions that certainly match up with those of NJDC,” 

Kaine’s appointment was also viewed through the lens of the U.S-Israel relationship. Kaine is a fervent supporter of the Iran nuclear deal, and in March 2015 he was one of the few Democrats who boycotted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s controversial speech. In an “>maintained that while Netanyahu did not see eye-to-eye with the administration on the nuclear deal, current and former Israeli security and intelligence officials agree that the military corporation between the two countries has been “stellar” and “now you’re seeing a whole group of Israeli security officials who are willing to publicly say now that the Iranian nuclear deal has given them some breathing room and inspections that will give them some security that Iran won’t develop a nuclear weapon, at least for the first fifteen years.” Kaine further stressed, “There has [only] been one significant disagreement between the president and the prime minister of Israel over the Iran nuclear program.”

The Republican Jewish Coalition, in a statement released after Clinton announced the selection of Kaine on Twitter, said it’s further proof Clinton cannot be trusted to keep our country safe.” “Whether it’s his vote for the Iran deal, which paves the way to a nuclear-armed Iran, or his proud support of the progressive anti-Israel J Street agenda which earned him their enthusiastic endorsement, Senator Kaine has shown how out of touch he is on the dangers facing our country,” said RJC Executive Director Matt Brooks.

In an interview, Halber challenged the critics of Kaine’s pro-Israel stance. “If you go by that standard, you might as well disqualify half of the Congress as unsympathetic to Israel,” he said. “That’s a barometer that is simply not fair, and, frankly, it’s wrong.”

Kaine, Halber said, would actually “adhere much closer to what Democrats before Obama have done, which is less daylight between the administrations.”

“I think he would follow the example of President Bill Clinton and George W. Bush and others, which is that the less daylight that is shown in public — I think he would go back; he would see that the Obama administration – by having more daylight between Israel and the U.S. – may have made it more difficult and harmed the relationship in some ways,” he stressed. “If Hillary Clinton and Kaine get elected, I think you would see them going back to a more traditional arguing behind the scenes. Kaine has visited Netanyahu’s office several times, and I think, if Hillary Clinton wins, you will have two people in office who already have established a solid relationship with the prime minister and the State of Israel.” 

Rosenbaum, while touting his support for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship, pointed to the fact that American Jews are a minority, and, therefore, should focus less on issues like the candidate’s support for Israel and more on his firm commitment to the principles of governance. “While his religious background causes him to oppose abortion personally, he has consistently said that his personal views, especially his religious views, should not be the basis of public policy,” said Rosenbaum. “American Jews should focus on this principle. Jews are a minority religious group in every nation other than Israel. Our history teaches us that when we are a minority and majority religions become intertwined with state governance, the outcome is never good for Jews.”

Kaine hailed as strong supporter of Israel Read More »

Email leak forces DNC chair to step down

Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz on Sunday resisted calls to immediately step down as chairwoman and give up her role in presiding over the party’s convention this week after leaked emails proved the DNC was in tank for Hillary Clinton during the Democratic presidential primary.

Earlier Sunday, CNN reported Wasserman Schultz would not speak or preside at the convention after a cache of more than 19,000 emails leaked on Friday by WikiLeaks revealed DNC officials explored ways to undermine Sanders’ insurgent presidential campaign, including raising questions about whether Sanders, who is Jewish, was really an atheist.

Appearing on CNN’s State of the Union Sunday morning, Sanders said the release of the DNC emails underscores the position he’s held for months that Wasserman Schultz needs to go. “I don’t think she is qualified to be the chair of the DNC, not only for these awful emails, which revealed the prejudice of the DNC, but also because we need a party that reaches out to working people and young people, and I don’t think her leadership style is doing that,” Sanders told Jake Tapper.

But despite the pressure mounted on her to step down. Wasserman Schultz insisted that she would go ahead and address delegates at the convention kicking off on Monday. “The best way for me to accomplish those goals is to step down as Party Chair at the end of this convention,” the DNC chairwoman said in a statement on Sunday. “As Party Chair, this week I will open and close the Convention and I will address our delegates about the stakes involved in this election not only for Democrats, but for all Americans.”

In a statement following the announcement, Hillary Clinton praised Wasserman Schultz for taking the fight to the Republicans, totally ignoring the email controversy. 

“I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country, and will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally, in Florida, and in other key states, Clinton said. “I look forward to campaigning with Debbie in Florida and helping her in her re-election bid–because as President, I will need fighters like Debbie in Congress who are ready on day one to get to work for the American people.”

CNN reported that co-chair Donna Brazile will take over as interim head of the DNC.

Jewish Democratic leaders expressed their gratitude to Wasserman Schultz for her using her influential role as leader of the DNC for the benefit of the Jewish community. 

Greg Rosenbaum, Chair of the NJDC Board of Directors, said in a statement: “Before I became involved with NJDC in any capacity, Debbie told me how she had, early on in her career, been a staffer for the organization. She spoke with such enthusiasm about the organization that I decided, then and there, to volunteer my time and support for NJDC. Some time after that, on the day that she was elected party chair, she sought me out at a reception in her honor to ask if I would get involved with Jewish American Heritage Month. The legislation authorizing JAHM had been the first bill she sponsored when she joined the House and she thought JAHM could use some business experience on its board. Out of a lot of well-qualified people to take on that role, she chose me. For my involvement in both NJDC and JAHM, among the most rewarding times of my life, I will forever be in Debbie’s debt. Though this chapter of her public life may be closing, I have no doubt that Debbie will continue to have a very influential role in the American Jewish community.”

Marc Stanley, immediate past chair of NJDC, added, “I am personally sad that she is resigning, but am very grateful for her service and looking forward to honoring her for her years of service Monday ,when we pay tribute to the history of Jewish women in the Democratic Party from Bella Abzug to Debbie Wasserman Schultz and again Thursday, when we honor all current and former Jewish members of Congress and give special recognition to Debbie for all of her years with the party. ”

Read the DNC statement in full below:

Statement From DNC Chair On Presiding Convention and Concluding Tenure

Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz issued the following statement:

“I have been privileged to serve as the DNC Chair for five and a half years helping to re-elect President Obama and Vice President Biden, strengthening our State Party Partnership in all 50 states, leading a vigorous primary election this past year while preparing for the general election and representing millions of Democrats across the country. I couldn’t be more excited that Democrats are nominating our first woman presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton, a friend I have always believed in and know will be a great President.

“We arrived here in Philadelphia with the most inclusive and progressive platform the party has ever proposed and a unified recommendation from the Rules Committee on our path forward as Democrats. I am proud of my role in leading these efforts.

“My first priority has always been serving the people of the 23rd district of Florida and I look forward to continuing to do that as their member of Congress for years to come. As the mother of my three amazing children and the Representative of Florida’s 23rd congressional district, I know that electing Hillary Clinton as our next president is critical for America’s future. I look forward to serving as a surrogate for her campaign in Florida and across the country to ensure her victory.

“Going forward, the best way for me to accomplish those goals is to step down as Party Chair at the end of this convention. As Party Chair, this week I will open and close the Convention and I will address our delegates about the stakes involved in this election not only for Democrats, but for all Americans. We have planned a great and unified Convention this week and I hope and expect that the DNC team that has worked so hard to get us to this point will have the strong support of all Democrats in making sure this is the best convention we have ever had.

“I’ve been proud to serve as the first woman nominated by a sitting president as Chair of the Democratic National Committee and I am confident that the strong team in place will lead our party effectively through this election to elect Hillary Clinton as our 45th president.”

During her historic five and a half year tenure, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz:

– Reinvested in the State Party Partnerships that were the hallmark of the 50 State Strategy begun by one of her predecessors.
– Successfully paid off the 2012 election debt entirely.
– Increased investments in the state parties by 50% over the previous baseline, while investing in national infrastructure like our voter file, communications, digital and research support for state parties that’s making a difference nationwide.
– Has been a fierce advocate and tireless fighter for progressive ideals and the safety and security of hardworking American families.
– The DNC has stood up the coordinated campaigns our Party needs to win up and down the ballot in November.
– The Party has recruited, trained, and mobilized top talent in everything from research, to communications, to social media and voter targeting. That means that in addition to the data and analytics advantage our Party has leveraged in the last two presidential elections, we now have a field and outreach edge in battleground states.
– Advanced the most progressive platform in Party history, bringing the broad spectrum of our party together and integrating the best ideas of our campaigns.
Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz has served her constituents in South Florida for nearly 25 years after having been the youngest woman elected to the Florida state legislature – at 26 – and the first Jewish woman elected to the U.S. Congress from the state of Florida.

She’s used her voice and her vote to support a $15 minimum wage, was a champion for the Affordable Care Act, and is the lead sponsor in Congress to fully fund the Zika virus crisis which is a major health concern in her home state of Florida and across the country.

Email leak forces DNC chair to step down Read More »

This Lithuanian concentration camp is now a wedding venue

In this drab city 55 miles west of Vilnius, there are few heritage sites as mysterious and lovely looking as the Seventh Fort.

This 18-acre red-brick bunker complex, which dates to 1882, features massive underground passages that connect its halls and chambers. Above ground, the hilltop fortress is carpeted with lush grass and flowers whose yellow blooms attract bees and songbirds along with families who come here to frolic in the brief Baltic summer.

It’s also a popular venue for graduation parties and wedding receptions, complete with buffets and barbecues, as well as summer camps for children who enjoy the elaborate treasure hunts around the premises.

Most of the visitors are unaware that they are playing, dining and celebrating at a former concentration camp.

In 1941, thousands of Jews were imprisoned, starved and finally massacred by Lithuanian Nazi collaborators at the Seventh Fort in what was then the largest mass killing in the country’s history. The complex is believed to be the first concentration camp located on territory that Nazi Germany conquered following its eastward invasion.

Even by the unfortunate commemorative standards in Eastern Europe — where many Jewish cemeteries and Holocaust sites have been damaged or neglected — the Seventh Fort is unusual for its erasure of the recent past. It was privatized in 2009 and is now owned by the Military Heritage Center — a nongovernmental association run by a 37-year-old Lithuanian informatics specialist, Vladimir Orlov — which charges admission fees of approximately $4 to some parts of the compound and organizes parties at the venue.

Critics say this reality is a byproduct of the Lithuanian state’s alleged failures in confronting the country’s dark history during the genocide.

“It just says a lot of bad things about my country,” said Ruta Vanagaite, a Lithuanian novelist who drew international attention to the site in a book she co-authored last year with Efraim Zuroff, the Israel director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. The apparent amnesia surrounding the fort, she added, is also indicative of “the attitude to the people who were killed.”

The remains of 5,000 murdered Jews are buried at the fort in mass graves that are marked by a few poles and rocks. Relatives sometimes light candles in memory of the dead.

The Military Heritage Center’s website tells of the area’s Holocaust-era significance and offers, for a fee, tours of the former killing site alongside a general tour about the fort’s military history. It also has a military history museum but does not have a permanent exhibit about the Holocaust.

A boy playing soccer at the entrance to the former concentration camp known as the Seventh Fort in Kaunas, Lithuania, July 12, 2016. Photo by Cnaan Liphshiz

The Seventh Fort is one of several controversial issues featured in Vanagaite’s best-selling book “Our People,” which is currently being translated from Lithuanian to English. A groundbreaking treatise on Lithuanians’ complicity in the Holocaust, the book flies in the face of the government-promoted narrative that speaks of Lithuanians merely as victims of the Russian occupation that replaced the German one.

This sentiment is prevalent across Eastern Europe but is particularly strong in Lithuania, the only country in the world that formally considers Russia’s domination of its territory a genocide. The perception of victimhood, according to Zuroff, for decades has precluded an open debate on the prominent role of thousands of Lithuanian collaborators — some of them honored as patriotic heroes for their anti-communist credentials — in the murder of 95 percent of the country’s Jews.

Jonny Daniels, founder of From the Depths, a Holocaust commemoration group in Poland, said he was “shocked and disgusted” during his visit to the Seventh Fort earlier this month. The site is below “any level of decency and respect,” he said, adding that Lithuania’s government “should hold their heads in shame and be condemned internationally that such an important and holy site be privatized.”

In Poland, Daniels said, “one could be prosecuted for much less.”

The criticism notwithstanding, Lithuania recently made gestures that drew praise from local and international Jewish groups. Last month, the country’s parliament passed naturalization laws that facilitate the acquisition of Lithuanian nationality for descendants of Litvak Jews. The city of Vilnius, which opened a Yiddish institute in 2001, is planning to build $10 million Jewish museum and is carrying an archaeological excavation of its former great synagogue.

But Lithuania also has faced harsh criticism for honoring collaborators, including Jonas Noreika, who is believed to have helped murder Jews, and Juozas Ambrazevicius-Brazaitis, the leader of a local pro-Nazi government. The latter was reburied in Lithuania in a state funeral in 2012, while the former is commemorated with a memorial plaque on a park near the home of Vilnius’ mayor.

Lithuania has laws against displaying Nazi and communist symbols, but it is one of a handful EU countries where one can display a swastika with impunity as per a 2010 court ruling that defines a Baltic variant of the symbol as an ancient part of Lithuanian tradition predating its use by the Nazis. Nonetheless, “classic” swastikas, identical to the ones featured on Nazi Germany’s flag, are sometimes featured in ultranationalist marches that are held annually across Lithuania.

In a country where many again feel threatened by an expansionist Russia, the veneration of such figures as Noreika and Ambrazevicius-Brazaitis “goes hand in hand with cases of disrespect toward the victims” at the Seventh Fort, Zuroff said.

“There’s also an element of concealment — if it’s not commemorated, then it didn’t happen,” he added.

Orlov, the operator of the fort, insisted events are not held on the area where the Holocaust victims are buried, which he said accounts for 2 percent of the entire compound.

“Every place you see in Lithuania has some tragic story. This place is no different,” he told a JTA reporter who inquired about costs for a wedding reception.

Assuring his interlocutor a reception would not be a problem, Orlov promised to send a quote indicating cost. The email was never received — though perhaps it was snared in the interviewer’s spam filter.

 

Orlov said the financial reports of his organization were “confidential information,” but added it had a growing income of approximately $35,000 annually. All revenues go toward maintenance and educational work on the Seventh Fort, he said, and to paying a staff of 11 an average monthly salary of $11o — about a third of the minimum wage in Lithuania.

Jonny Daniels, founder of the Poland-based Holocaust commemoration group From the Depths, at the entrance to the Seventh Fort in Kaunas, Lithuania, July 12, 2016. Photo by Cnaan Liphshiz

In their book, Vanagaite and Zuroff revealed that in 2012, Orlov discovered human remains in the area he had purchased. When authorities did not answer his request for resolving issues that arose with his discovery, he had the remains of thousands of Holocaust victims exhumed and placed in trash bags.

“In the pit we discovered a layer of lime, through which what looked like sticks were sticking up. They were the bones of the people shot,” the book quoted Orlov as saying. “After pumping the water out of the ditch and sticking a hand down there, I felt an endless number of bones. Their depth might be several meters.”

He went to the police, the Cultural Heritage Protection Department and the Jewish community to report his discovery, according to the book. But failing to achieve any result, the book said, Orlov “packed the bones into three garbage bags and left them in a storage space.” Following reports on the situation by the local media, the Kaunas city administration had the bones reburied in 2014 where they had been discovered.

Despite these problems, Lithuanian society is for the first time on the path to dealing with its Holocaust record, Zuroff said.

The book he wrote with Vanagaite triggered the first major public debate in mass media on the subject, leading to initiatives to revoke state honors for collaborators and a pledge by state historians to “try to publish” this year a list of about 1,000 known Holocaust perpetrators.

This Lithuanian concentration camp is now a wedding venue Read More »

Ex-Georgia congresswoman: Israel responsible for Nice and Munich terror attacks

A former Georgia congresswoman claimed that Israel was responsible for the recent terror attacks in France and Germany.

Cynthia McKinney posted on Twitter Saturday night: “Same Israeli photographer captures Nice and Munich tragedies. How likely is that? Remember the Dancing Israelis? …”

The tweet includes a link to a video about the photographer’s coincidence on the Veterans’ Today site.

Dancing Israelis refers to a conspiracy theory that five Israeli men were detained by police in New Jersey on 9/11  after being caught celebrating the attack on the World Trade Center.

The photographer in question, Richard Gutjahr, is not Israeli, but is married to an Israeli, Einat Wilf, a former Knesset member for the Labor party. Wilf served in the prestigious Israeli army’s intelligence unit 8200.

McKinney was the Green Party presidential nominee in 2008.

Gutjahr tweeted photos from the sites of both attacks, though he later said the Munich photos accidentally were deleted from his camera.

In Nice, 84 people were killed July 14 by a rampaging truck driven by a French-Tunisian man. On Friday, a lone gunman, 18, shot up a Munich mall, killing nine.

Ex-Georgia congresswoman: Israel responsible for Nice and Munich terror attacks Read More »

Convicted spy Pollard urges reversal of U.S. parole conditions

Jonathan Pollard, a former U.S. Navy U.S intelligence officer convicted of spying for Israel, asked a judge on Friday to overturn restrictive probation conditions imposed when he was released in November after serving 30 years in prison.

Eliot Lauer, Pollard's lawyer, argued in federal court in Manhattan that the U.S. Parole Commission had imposed arbitrary requirements that he wear an electronic tracking device and submit his work computer to monitoring.

Those conditions were based partly on the grounds that Pollard could still disclose government secrets, which Lauer called inconceivable as his client would need to remember classified information from more than 30 years ago.

“The information is ridiculously stale, and it's the type of information that no human being could reasonably recall,” Lauer told U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest.

By leaving the computer restriction in place, Lauer said Pollard was being prevented from taking an investment firm job.

But a prosecutor pointed to a letter by U.S. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper stating that documents compromised by Pollard remain classified at the levels of “top secret” and “secret.”

“They do pose a current harm to national security if they are disclosed further,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Rebecca Sol Tinio told the court.

She also said the commission rightly concluded Pollard was a flight risk given he had repeatedly expressed the wish to move to Israel, where his wife lives. Pollard was granted Israeli citizenship in prison and Israel had long pushed for his release. As part of his parole, Pollard must remain in the United States for five years.

Forrest said she planned to rule within four weeks.

Pollard, 61, pleaded guilty in 1986 to conspiracy to commit espionage in connection with his providing Israeli contacts hundreds of classified documents he had obtained as a Naval intelligence specialist in exchange for thousands of dollars.

He was sentenced in 1987 to life in prison. After serving 30 years, which included time in custody following his 1985 arrest, Pollard was released on parole on Nov. 20 from a federal prison in North Carolina and now lives in New York. 

Friday's proceedings were the second time Pollard challenged his parole conditions in court.

In December, Forrest ordered the U.S. Parole Commission to provide further justification for the tracking device and computer monitoring. The commission in March upheld the conditions while providing further reasoning.

Convicted spy Pollard urges reversal of U.S. parole conditions Read More »

GHOSTBUSTERS *Movie Review*

The GHOSTBUSTERS trailer on YouTube is the most disliked video ever on the site.  However, I wanted to reserve judgement about the movie since it comes with impressive credentials: Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Leslie Jones, Kate McKinnon and Chris Hemsworth are all great comedians and actors.  The director behind GHOSTBUSTERS, Paul Feig, was the creative mind behind BRIDESMAIDS.  In short, these people know comedy.

Unfortunately, while they may know comedy they didn’t quite hit the mark this time around.  It could have been the high expectations going into this update/remake, or it could be that magic just doesn’t always strike in the same place.  Regardless, GHOSTBUSTERS missed the mark.

Tone was the biggest issue for GHOSTBUSTERS and if it had been ironed out then a lot of the other issues would have been addressed.  While it was clearly a comedy, it also asked viewers to respect the main characters as impressively credentialed scientists and the way those two aspects of the movie were handled made them incongruous with each other.

Kristen Wiig plays Dr. Erin Gilbert, a ditzy klutz, which was hard to reconcile with the her impressive background as a doctor of science at Columbia University. Kate McKinnon’s Dr. Jillian Holtzman was the most confusing since she alternated coming across as intelligent and completely strange.  I realize that in real life people can easily embody more than one of these qualities. But, in a movie like this which doesn’t seek to flesh out well-rounded characters it felt like they were trying to go in too many directions at once.

I was disappointed by Melissa McCarthy’s Dr. Abby Yates as well. While I’m not generally a fan of Melissa McCarthy’s brand of physical comedy—which, incidentally, didn’t flow as strongly through GHOSTBUSTERS as I’d expected–I respect her acting ability since she commits wholeheartedly to all of her characters. This time around, though, I got the impression that she didn’t believe in what she was doing anymore than I did. Strangely, the only time I really bought her role was during a part that’s in the trailer when she’s possessed by a ghost.

There were two things I loved in particular. First was the music and how the original GHOSTBUSTERS theme song progressed from the original one to a more modern version as the movie went on The second thing I really liked were the effects, the ones at the very beginning in particular.

For more details about GHOSTBUSTERS, including a more in-depth analysis about the music and effects, as well as an exclusive interview with original GHOSTBUSTER Ernie Hudson, take a look below:

—>Looking for the direct link to the video?  Click here.

GHOSTBUSTERS *Movie Review* Read More »

Philadelphia Diary: Is an Orthodox political rebellion coming?

There weren’t many Jews last week in Cleveland’s GOP convention. But there were some, and a notably large proportion of them were Orthodox Jews. Not all of them, of course – but a lot. There will be more Jews, a lot more, this week in Philadelphia for the Democratic convention. Possibly even more Orthodox Jews, because of the overall larger number of Jews – but I still assume the relative percentage of Orthodox Jews will be smaller (I will start counting black hats and Kippahs once the proceedings begin).

Of course, all of this should not come as huge surprise. We’ve known for quite a while now that the Orthodox tend to be more Republican than the non-Orthodox majority of American Jewry, as the Portrait of American Orthodox Jews by Pew concluded. “Other U.S. Jews lean heavily toward the Democratic Party, but the opposite is true of the Orthodox. As of mid-2013, 57% of Orthodox Jews identified with the Republican Party or said they leaned toward the GOP,” the report said. President Obama did not perform well in Jewish Orthodox neighborhoods in New York. His “worst precincts,” according to a New York Times report, “were in Orthodox Jewish areas like Ocean Parkway and Williamsburg in Brooklyn and Kew Gardens Hills in Queens. In a few precincts in Borough Park, Brooklyn, Mr. Romney won more than 90 percent of the vote.”

So why mention this again in the context of the conventions? Because I believe there is another dynamic underway within the Jewish community ­– no less interesting than the Orthodox becoming Republican. It is a dynamic that in some ways resembles a parallel dynamic we see in Israel, one whose consequences can be far-reaching: the dynamic of an Orthodox community that is no longer willing to accept its numerical minority status as a reason to adhere to a non-Orthodox majority view on crucial political questions. The Orthodox community in Israel asserts itself politically in many ways – much more than it did in the past. And I see signs that the Orthodox community is on the way to imitating this dynamic. The conventions of the two parties give us an opportunity to see how this happens in practice.

It begins with the sentiment, which many Orthodox Jews share, that it is time for the Orthodox community – just 10% of the total Jewish population of the US – to have a stronger voice than it does within the larger community. Why would they feel deserving of such a voice? Because of their higher level of commitment to Judaism (if you do not think they are more committed, take a quick look at the Pew data – it is hard to dispute such a notion); because of their larger families and better performance in retaining them within the Jewish camp; and because of their inner-feeling that they are the “future” while other Jews are less so.

Orthodox Jews in Israel tend to have similar feelings as they strive to have a stronger voice and more influence on Israel’s policies. They believe that the “past” is the secular Labor-tilting groups, and that the “future” is the religious hawkish-tilting groups. Orthodox Israelis have more children than other Israelis. They have a higher level of engagement and are more committed to Judaism. And they are ahead of the American Orthodox community when it comes to translating the community’s energy and commitment to political influence over the policies of the Jewish State.

In America the Jewish establishment is still a leftward-tilting, progressively-tilting, establishment. Peter Beinart may think otherwise – he famously concluded that the Jewish establishment fails to keep up with the times and with the views of the majority of Jewish Americans. But many Orthodox Jews don’t really count the majority of Jews – and surely don’t consider the views of (the somewhat Orthodox) Beinart seriously.

They only count the majority of Jews who truly care. They count the majority of Jews whose passion about Judaism – and Israel – is real. They care to find a path to make these views heard more when the “Jewish view” is considered.

As they count these Jews – I say “they” and, of course, mean “some Orthodox leaders with whom I spoke in the last couple of weeks” –  they count them this way: Orthodox Jews care in higher percentages, and the level of care for each of them is higher. So, all in all, they might be the caring-majority, or at least a much more significant caring-minority than the establishment is ready to recognize.

What do they want? Some of them want a more prominent seat at the table, but even they are willing to admit that Orthodox activists and leaders are already visible in many Jewish organizations and establishments. They often have a nominal seat. So the seat is not the real issue – the issue is how much influence they have on the policies and viewpoints  of organizations. To what extent their views are taken into account when the Jewish leadership is making decisions on behalf of the community as a whole.

Notable case in point: Israel. Recent example: the reluctance on the part of the main Jewish organizations to support a change in the GOP platform that drops the “two state solution” from its agenda.

Orthodox Jewish Americans were very active in working to change the GOP platform. That’s why I decided to start making calls and ask questions about Orthodox political activism. What I was told was not surprising; Orthodox Jewish Americans, generally speaking, are not supportive of the two state solution. They do not see the settlements as a problem. They think that the Israeli government is sincere in wanting peace. Many of them will have no problem – and would actually cheer – an American administration that moves away from the two-state status quo.

Orthodox leaders with whom I spoke feel that the two state solution is, as one of them bluntly said, “the only religion of some of these [non-Orthodox] Jews.” When I told him this was not a fair portrait, he said “yes, but you know what I mean.”

And I do know what he means, because he told me: at his synagogue, some of the congregants are upset whenever Jewish organizations express their support for a Palestinian State. At his synagogue some of the congregants were highly upset when Jewish organizations spoke against the Iran deal but acted meekly to stop it. At his synagogue – he said – “people might be unrealistic to believe that the Jewish community can do more to stop the Iran deal. But why aren’t we expressing gratitude when the GOP decides to no longer tell Israel what to do and lets Israel decide by itself what to do is beyond me.” He mentioned the reports that AIPAC lobbied to keep the two state solution on the platform, and the fact that the ADL was “disappointed” with the language that was ultimately adopted. These policies he did not understand, nor was he willing to let them pass as the voice of the community.

Three out of four leaders with whom I spoke told me that things “need to change.” And since they do not expect them to change without a fight, they say that there might be a need for a fight. I asked all of them: Are you not worried about alienating other Jews and pushing them away from a position of support for Israel? One of them, obviously impatient with this question, told me I better read my own columns before I ask such questions. It took me two seconds to realize he was referring to my column from two weeks ago: Can you be Jewish and Liberal? The evidence says: not so easy.

Philadelphia Diary: Is an Orthodox political rebellion coming? Read More »