fbpx

May 31, 2016

Court awards employee $31,000 for abuse by Netanyahu’s wife

A former employee of the Israeli Prime Minister’s Residence was awarded some $31,000 by a Jerusalem labor court for mistreatment at the hands of the prime minister’s wife.

It was the second time this year the Jerusalem District Labor Court had ruled against Sara Netanyahu in an employment abuse case.

On Tuesday, the court found in favor of Guy Eliyahu, who had sued the Prime Minister’s Office for wrongful dismissal and abusive treatment, the Times of Israel reported. In testimony last fall, Eliyahu said Netanyahu called him to the residence in the middle of the night to heat a bowl of soup and, on another occasion, to wish her good night.

Judge Dita Proginin called the latter demand “an unreasonable and humiliating request that didn’t take into consideration the rights of the worker to be treated with respect and the right to work reasonable hours.”

In March, Proginin ruled in favor of another former employee of the Prime Minister’s Residence, Menny Naftali, who also claimed abuse by Netanyahu. Naftali was awarded some $43,735 in damages.

In the Eliyahu case, Proginin said Netanyahu created an “atmosphere of fear” at the residence and subjected Eliyahu to “damaging employment” that included “reprimands, shouting, humiliations, and excessive and unreasonable demands” as well as a work schedule “that doesn’t align with the law.”

Netanyahu’s lawyer, Yossi Cohen, in turn accused Proginin of “the real abusive treatment,” claiming the judge “blatantly ignored the testimony of Mrs. Netanyahu.” Following the Naftali ruling in March, Netanyahu tried unsuccessfully to have Proginin dismissed from the Eliyahu case.

The court’s ruling was the second blow in a bad week for the prime minister’s wife. On Sunday, Israeli police concluded a probe into fraud and misuse of public funds that may lead to an indictment of Netanyahu on criminal charges.

A police spokesperson said there had been established “an infrastructure of evidence” that police say may support prosecution and possibly a conviction.

The probe was initiated last year amid claims that Sara Netanyahu expensed services provided to her family for their private use, falsely claiming it was for the residence, which is not owned by the Netanyahus and whose maintenance is paid for by the state.

She has denied any wrongdoing throughout the investigation, in which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is not a suspect.

Court awards employee $31,000 for abuse by Netanyahu’s wife Read More »

Why Trump is Velcro, not Teflon (and how that helps him in the age of reality TV)

If there were a Pulitzer Prize for getting the best quote from a random person at a political event, it would have to go to Yamiche Alcindor, the New York Times reporter on the Bernie Sanders beat.

The winning quote comes from Victor Vizcarra, 45, of Los Angeles. At a Sanders rally in Anaheim last week, he ue happiness. Sure, some people may champion standards other than entertainment value, like: Is it important? Does it make me a better person? Does it make us a better society? But those people can’t get arrested unless they first can command attention.

A surefire way to occupy our attention is to tell us a story. Stories require conflict; without conflict, there’s no change, no drama, no plot. Trump is a walking attention magnet. He’s the never-ending story, the prince of plot, the king of conflict, the drama queen of TV and Twitter. A Trump presidency guarantees change. “Even if it’s like a Nazi-type change,” in Vizcarra’s words, it will never, ever be boring.

No wonder attacks on Trump aren’t working. Voting for president feels like making a casting choice for a reality show. The people in those shows may not be called actors, but they’ve been chosen to fit the genre’s types. They’re as formulaic as the characters in kabuki, commedia dell’arte and Punch and Judy shows. The players are fixed. There’s always a bad boy. That’s the part Trump is auditioning for.

Call him a bully, a liar, a xenophobe, a narcissist, a racist, a misogynist, an ignoramus, a big baby. He’s all those things. But those aren’t liabilities for the character he wants to play; they’re qualifications. The more you say it, the more equity you add to his brand. He’s not Teflon; he’s Velcro. What sticks to him just makes him a stronger candidate for the bad-boy role.

Hillary Clinton has a presidential temperament. Her script promises stability. If the choice in November is between “ ‘The Apprentice’ Goes to Washington” and “The Progressive Who Gets Things Done Show,” which one will the audience vote to watch?

Trump says, Let me entertain you. Vizcarra says, “A dark side of me wants to see what happens if Trump is in.” He’s not alone. But what happens in a reality show only has “stakes”; what happens in reality actually has consequences. Clinton’s challenge is to persuade America’s Vizcarras that their lives, not just their amusement, depend on the difference.

 Marty Kaplan is the Norman Lear professor of entertainment, media and society at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. Reach him at martyk@jewishjournal.com.

Why Trump is Velcro, not Teflon (and how that helps him in the age of reality TV) Read More »

Eric Trump says Iran deal convinced Donald Trump to run for president

The Iranian nuclear deal was one of the main factors that influenced Donald Trump’s decision to run for president in 2016, his son, Eric Trump, said on Sunday.

“I think, honestly, the Iran nuclear deal was one of the things that made him jump into the race,” Eric Trump told John Catsimatidis on the “Cats Roundtable” radio program on AM 970 in New York. “I think that was a game-changer for him.”

“That is when he finally said, ‘Kids, I am going to do it. I am going to give this a real shot,’” he added.

In his campaign kickoff speech at Trump Tower on June 16, 2015, Trump slammed President Barack Obama for rushing to sign a nuclear deal with Iran. “If he makes that deal, Israel maybe won’t exist very long,” Trump proclaimed. “We have to protect Israel.” Last month, during a campaign rally in Wisconsin, Trump said the Iranians abused Sec. of State John Kerry ‘mentally” and “like a child” during the nuclear negotiations. “They took advantage of him like he was a baby.”

“My number one priority is to dismantle the disastrous deal with Iran,” Trump assured the Jewish community during his address at AIPAC’s policy conference in March.

Eric Trump says Iran deal convinced Donald Trump to run for president Read More »

Liberal Jews plan a summer of opposing Donald Trump

Boycott Trump? Mock Trump? Trump, the musical?

Jewish liberals are ready to sow a summer of Donald Trump discontent in ways that aim both to bludgeon and entertain.

Bend the Arc, an advocacy group, is convening its first national conference here next week aimed in part at finding a strategy to keep the billionaire real estate magnate, who has secured the Republican nomination, from becoming president.

“We have been actively working and campaigning to make sure that Trump is defeated since early fall,” said Stosh Cotler, the CEO of the group, which was formed from the 2011 merger of the New York-based Jewish Funds for Justice and the West Coast-based Progressive Jewish Alliance. “That work will be continued at the conference.

“We’re hoping that this platform of 500 Jews will be an opportunity to get more folks involved in defeating Trump and the movement his candidacy has catalyzed.”

Mik Moore, the social media agitator behind the 2008 pro-Obama effort known as “The Great Schlep,” is planning a narrative series that would lampoon Trump.

Cotler said she would announce plans for a mass action that would involve Jews across the country. She did not provide more details, but pointed to the campaign to have major corporations boycott the Republican convention as a template.

That campaign, joining Bend the Arc with Color of Change, a black advocacy group, and Credo Action, a network of progressive activists, claims responsibility for Coca-Cola’s decision to markedly reduce its participation at this year’s convention, and has targeted others, including Google, Facebook and Apple. (Coca-Cola neither confirms nor denies activists’ pressure led the company to reduce its contributions to the convention, saying only that it is nonpartisan.)

Also speaking at the conference are representatives of Latino, African-American and Muslim advocacy groups, as well as politicians including Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the U.S. House of Representatives minority leader.

Other Bend the Arc actions targeting Trump include launching an online petition last November disguised as a mock “registry” of Jews — a pointed parody of his call for a registry of American Muslims — and a web adthat quoted Trump’s description of incoming Mexicans as “rapists and murderers” set against images of Nazi-era Jews who sought refuge in the United States.

“The ugly anti-immigrant rhetoric of today sounds painfully familiar to American Jews,” the ad said.

Moore’s Jewish Council for Education and Research was behind “The Great Schlep,” which drew on the talents of comedian Sarah Silverman to get young Jewish voters to persuade their grandparents in Florida to vote for Barack Obama. Silverman and actor Samuel Jackson were featured in videos in the 2012 campaign that had a similar message, albeit delivered in more profane terms.

This time around, Moore said the breadth of Trump’s challenge to liberal values demands not just a single video but a narrative series along the lines of “Halal in the Family,” a 2015 web series he helped develop featuring comedian Aasif Mandvi that promoted tolerance for Muslims.

“We’ve been thinking about how to use humor to take on Trump and to explain what his politics means,” Moore said.

“We’ve developing a bigger project, bigger than the ‘Schlep’ or ‘Wake the F— Up’,” he said, referring to Jackson’s 2012 video. “We want to do some storytelling this cycle and create characters people better connect to — better than a single one-off video.”

Moore said it was too early to reveal what shape the Trump series would take.

Jewish groups are grappling with how to confront Trump. His “America First” rhetoric has resonated with white supremacist groups, whose support Trump has been reluctant to forcefully disavow, and some of his proposals, including mass deportation of undocumented immigrants, monitoring mosques and registering Muslims, run afoul of the mainstream groups’ civil rights agenda. But directly targeting a nominee risks casting a tax-exempt group as partisan.

A number of groups, notably the Anti-Defamation League, have not hesitated to name Trump. The ADL told the Forward last week that its criticism of Trump is consistent with its longstanding practice of calling out by name politicians who cross red lines.

Other groups, including the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, the umbrella public policy group, have chosen to decry the rhetoric while not naming the candidate.

Bend the Arc has an affiliated political action committee through which it channels much – but not all – of its anti-Trump activism. Cotler said the PAC hopes to raise $500,000 this season, which will be used, Bend the Arc spokesman Elliot Levy told JTA, “to promote the election of leaders who champion Bend the Arc’s issues and can move our country in the right direction.”

Cotler said Trump’s candidacy is enough of an affront to Jewish values of tolerance and inclusion that it should supersede anxieties about appearing partisan. Bend the Arc is able to carry out its anti-Trump advocacy through its 501(c)(4) group, Bend the Arc Jewish Action, which under IRS rules may devote a portion of its activities to politics.

“The Jewish community that Bend the Arc believes in is one that values democracy, inclusion and equity that understands that when any other community is singled out and banned, this goes so deeply against our core values,” she said. “This is a values-based election; this is not a partisan issue.”

Liberal Jews plan a summer of opposing Donald Trump Read More »

Ya’alon reaches out to donors in preparation for potential run against Netanyahu

Former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe “Bogie” Ya’alon has begun the first phase of launching a potential run for prime minister as head of a new political party, or by forming an alliance with former disgruntled colleagues, by reaching out to potential donors in a letter sent in English and independently obtained by Jewish Insider.

“I entered politics out of a sense of commitment to the State of Israel and its security and for this reason I am not considering quitting the public or political arena,” wrote Ya’alon, who resigned from the Netanyahu government earlier this month. “I regard this period as a ‘time-out’ after which I intend to return and run for Israel’s national leadership.”

In a move that shocked the political world and his colleagues in the Likud Party, Ya’alon resigned from the cabinet and the Knesset after negotiations with Yisrael Beiteinu advanced and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered his long-time rival Avigdor Lieberman the defense portfolio.

Ya’alon explained the surprising move by refusing to “sacrifice the needs of our nation or the security of our citizens in favor of political or personal agendas.”

He added, “Of late I have found myself in disagreement with the prime minister and with certain ministers and members of the Knesset over a number of fundamental issues both morally and professionally. I am saddened to witness the fact that a small and extreme minority are taking over sectors of the Likud party and influencing parts of Israel’s complex society. It is unfortunate that some of Israel’s most senior politicians have chosen the path of separation and incitement instead of reducing the flames of conflict.”

Ya’alon concluded his letter by thanking his donors for their support over the years, adding, “I sincerely hope that we will keep in touch, and hope that you will always feel free to continue to remain in contact with me in the future.”

The content of the letter was first reported by “>showed that if elections to the Knesset were held now, a new party headed by Ya’alon, former Interior Minister Gideon Sa’ar and by Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon, would win 25 seats. That would put the new party ahead of Netanyahu’s Likud, which would fall to 21 seats from its current 30.

Ya’alon raised 1,167,503.48 shekels from 201 contributors for the Likud primaries since 2008. Top U.S. donors include the Falic family, Ken Bialkin, Ken Abramowitz, Adam Milstein, Melvin Salberg, Lawrence Feigen, Eric Mandel, the Asher family, David Kronfeld, among others.

Read the full letter below:

Dear Friend ,

I hope this letter finds you in good health.

About a week ago, I informed the Prime Minister that I wished to tender my resignation as a member of the Government and of the Knesset.

I entered politics out of a sense of commitment to the State of Israel and its security and for this reason I am not considering quitting the public or political arena. I regard this period as a “time-out” after which I intend to return and run for Israel’s national leadership.

In the past in whichever capacity I served whether in uniform or in the Cabinet as a Minister I have always had Israel’s best interests in mind particularly pertaining to her security. I have always refused to sacrifice the needs of our nation or the security of our citizens in favor of political or personal agendas.

I worked closely with the Prime Minister in a most professional and practical manner for a lengthy period time .This mutual co-operation was most effective while leading “Operation Protective Edge” and for this I thank him . Of late I have found myself in disagreement with the Prime Minister and with certain ministers and members of the Knesset over a number of fundamental issues both morally and professionally.

I am saddened to witness the fact that a small and extreme minority are taking over sectors of the Likud party and influencing parts of Israel’s complex society.

It is unfortunate that some of Israel’s most senior politicians have chosen the path of separation and incitement instead of reducing the flames of conflict. A strong leadership should be driven by a sense of moral standards and this path should be pursued even in the face of opposition. When leadership is driven by electoral considerations and swayed by public opinion this is an avenue I can no longer traverse with a clear conscience.

I do not regret the moral and professional stand that I took and am unwilling to alter my opinions . I realize the personal cost – ending my position as Minister of Defense.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your friendship and support over the years and sincerely hope that we will keep in touch.

I have always considered the naturally strong bond between Israel and World Jewry of prime importance. It is vital to the State of Israel and I am personally very grateful for all you have done and are continuing to do to strengthen that bond.

In conclusion – on a more personal note may I express my appreciation for your friendship and hope that you will always feel free to continue to remain in contact with me in the future.

With best regards

Moshe (Bogie) Ya’alon

 

Ya’alon reaches out to donors in preparation for potential run against Netanyahu Read More »

Democratic platform will reflect ‘longstanding’ support for Israel

In response to “>changes to the platform’s wording about Israel, a policy that shows more sympathy for the Palestinian side of the conflict. According to a report by the “>deliveredat the Saban Forum in Washington, DC, in December 2015. “Only a two-state solution can provide Palestinian’s independence, sovereignty and dignity and provide Israelis the secure and recognized borders of a democratic Jewish state,” Clinton said. “Israelis deserve security, recognition and a normal life free from terror and Palestinian’s should be able to govern themselves in their own state in peace and dignity.”

“The Democratic platform has always, always shown incredibly strong and longstanding support for Israel,” Sherman stressed. “Secretary Clinton has been very forthright about what she believes about her support for Israel’s security and the unbreakable bond between the U.S. and Israel. And, as she said in the Saban speech, she has laid out the importance of the two-state solution because the two-state solution ensures that Israelis have secure and recognized borders in a Democratic Jewish state – which is critical and fundamental – and it can provide Palestinians independence, sovereignty and dignity.”

Democratic platform will reflect ‘longstanding’ support for Israel Read More »

Some issues complicate the narrative of wide Israel-Diaspora gaps

A few days ago, Gallup published an analysis on the views of religious groups in America on 5 “key issues” – abortion, doctor-assisted suicide, the cloning of animals, gay-lesbian relations, and having a baby outside marriage.

If you are not totally ignorant of American Jewish social trends you will not be surprised to learn that the Jews have the most liberal views of all religious groups on all of these issues, and that they have views quite similar to the most liberal Americans – those with “no religion”.

As Gallup puts it: “Jews and those with no religious preferences have virtually identical views on the morality of abortion, doctor-assisted suicide, gay-lesbian relations and cloning animals. Jews are somewhat less likely than nonreligious Americans to believe having a baby outside of marriage is moral, 68% to 80%.” Take a look:

 

No religion

Jewish

Catholic

Protestant

Mormon

% saying each is “morally acceptable”

%

%

%

%

%

Abortion

73

76

38

33

18

Doctor-assisted suicide

77

73

47

43

30

Cloning animals

50

50

33

28

33

Gay-lesbian relations

83

85

62

41

28

Having a baby outside of marriage

80

68

59

47

25

 

This is an opportunity to point out something that is often ignored in the never-ending talk about Israel-Diaspora relations – and about the contradicting trends among US Jews and Israeli Jews. Supposedly, as Jews in America become more liberal, the Jews of Israel are becoming more conservative. And indeed, by some measures that is the case: Jews in Israel tend to be more tribal, while American Jews are becoming more “universalist” in their outlook. The recent report by the Pew Research Center highlighted the gaps between the two largest Jewish communities: “Most Israeli Jews describe their ideology as in the center (55%) or on the right (37%) within the Israeli political spectrum. Just 8% of Israeli Jews say they lean left. American Jews, meanwhile, generally describe their ideology as liberal (49%) or moderate (29%) on the American political spectrum, while about one-in-five (19%) say they are politically conservative.”

Yet this narrative of wide gaps is disrupted when one considers the views of Jewish Americans and Jewish Israelis on social issues such as the ones included in the Gallup analysis.

Take, for example, gay marriage. Are Israelis more conservative on this issue than Jewish Americans? They probably are. But taking all things into account – their circumstances and the region they live in, the fact that Israel has a relatively traditional society, that Israel includes a larger segment of Orthodox Jews – the differences are as hardly as wide as you might suspect. Equality for gays and lesbians, including the ability to wed, is supported by a majority of Jews in Israel. A survey in 2013 found that “89 percent of secular people say they are in favor of full equality, as did 72 percent of traditional respondents and 46 percent of those who defined themselves as religious and Arabs.”

Support of equality for gays is consistent among Israeli Jews, and toleration of discrimination or bigotry against the gay community is low. In a recent JPPI survey we asked Jewish Israelis to say if they agree that “homosexuals should not be Members of Knesset,” and eighty percent of them disagreed. The only group that agreed with such a notion was that of ultra-Orthodox Jews (they are about 10% of the Jewish population).

Or take abortion as an example: unlike the case of gay marriage, in which there is a clear gap between public opinion (supportive) and official policies (no gay marriage – although court decisions have made gay couples equal in the material sense), abortion policies in Israel are highly lax. Israelis are not enthusiastic about the idea of abortion, but see it as necessary. They also have a tendency to disapprove of any government policies that could affect what they see as highly personal matters. Considering Israel’s affection – some might say obsession – for children, its non-restrictive policies concerning abortion are even more remarkable.

In 2013, an international Pew survey found that while in America 17% say that abortion is “morally acceptable” (that is Americans, not Jewish Americans), in Israel that number is 25%. In America 29% said that “having Sex between unmarried adults is morally acceptable”. In Israel it was 36%. So Israel is definitely more liberal on these issues than America. It is probably a little less liberal on these issues than Jewish America – but not concerning all issues, and not by as wide a margin as some observers of Israel-Diaspora relations believe.

Some issues complicate the narrative of wide Israel-Diaspora gaps Read More »