fbpx

April 19, 2016

8 Articles Worth Reading

If you are like me, you are overwhelmed by the commentary and news on the US Presidential election, Jewish affairs in the United States, and events taking place in Israel. I read a great deal – and as a “service” to you, I offer the following 8 highlights of items I have read in the last week.

The first two are by Deborah Lipstadt and Tom Hayden respectively. They explain why they are supporting Hillary Clinton. I have known both for 35 and 25 years, respectively, and though I’m not surprised by Deborah's position, I am by Tom's – he explains why, though he respects Bernie, he must support Hillary.

The next piece (#3), by Uri Avnery, a 90+ veteran left-wing Israeli journalist and a guru to those of us who want his clear-headed thinking, explains why he likes the right-wing President of Israel Ruby Rivlin (my 2nd cousin once removed), and specifically, why he thinks there are possibilities in Ruby's confederation idea embracing both a Jewish state and an Arab state.

Item #4 is  about the Women of the Wall and a novel action planned for April 24, supported by my cousin Susan Bay Nimoy in memory of Leonard, that will help keep the pressure on the government to stick to its agreement to create an egalitarian prayer space at the Southern Wall of the Kotel.

The remainder of the articles include a NY Times report on Joe Biden's speech yesterday at the J Street National Leadership Conference in Washington, D.C. , as well as two pieces by left-wing American and Israeli journalists (Peter Beinart and Chemi Shalev) on the controversy surrounding Simone Zimmerman, an outstanding young pro-Israel activist who was hired and then fired within two days by the Sanders Presidential campaign.

Happy reading!

John

1) Why I’m for Hillary (and Not for Him), by Deborah Lipstadt, The Forward, April 17 http://forward.com/opinion/politics/338754/why-im-for-hillary-and-not-for-him/#ixzz46BcpYin1

2) I Used to Support Bernie, but Then I Changed My Mind – Tom Hayden, The Nation, April 12, 2016

“I have a variety of concerns about both candidates’ campaigns. But I intend to vote for Hillary Clinton in the California primary for one fundamental reason.” http://www.thenation.com/article/i-used-to-support-bernie-but-then-i-changed-my-mind/

3) Squaring the Circle, by Uri Avnery, April 15, 2016 – Jewish Business News – “I like the President of the State of Israel, Reuven (“Rubi”) Rivlin. I like him very much…he is a very humane person. He is kind and unassuming. His family has been rooted in Palestine for many generations. He sees himself as the president of all Israelis, including the Arab citizens…This week, President Rivlin published a peace plan…based on a federation of two ‘entities’ – a Zionist-Jewish entity and an Arab-Palestinian one…In present-day Israel, ideas are frozen…a (con)federation can …allow both peoples to be free in their own states, with their own identities, national flags and anthems, governments and soccer teams, while at the same time saving the unity of the country and solving their joint problems in unity and close cooperation…”

http://jewishbusinessnews.com/2016/04/15/uri-avnery-squaring-the-circle/

4) Israel Public Radio Rejects Women of the Wall Ad, April 13, 2016 – Israel public radio rejected a Women of the Wall ad that included a woman chanting parts of the priestly blessing for being “controversial.” Read more here. http://forward.com/video/338622/israel-public-radio-rejects-women-of-the-wall-ad/#ixzz46D8Kqfvt

5) US feels 'overwhelming frustration' with Israeli government: Biden, The New York Times, April 19 – U.S. Vice President Joe Biden on Monday acknowledged ‘overwhelming frustration’ with the Israeli government and said the systemic expansion of Jewish settlements was moving Israel toward a dangerous ‘one-state reality’ and in the wrong direction.”

http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2016/04/19/world/middleeast/19reuters-usa-israel-biden.html?_r=2

6) As Dems Push Boundaries of Israel Debate, J Street Exults, and Worries, Forward, Nathan Guttman, April 19 – “J Street was born just as Barack Obama took over the White House and has since positioned itself as a group willing to give the administration, as well as members of Congress and candidates, the backing they need in order to take positions on Israel that may be unpopular among the more established American Israel Public Affairs Committee. J Street, through its political action committee, endorsed candidates for the House and Senate willing to voice liberal views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and recently pushed back forcefully against AIPAC’s massive drive to defeat President Obama’s nuclear deal with Iran. Now, the administration is returning the favor with a series of public gestures meant to send a clear signal to supporters of the lobby, and to AIPAC. President Obama invited a group of J Street student leaders to a meeting in the Oval Office on April 15. Then he sent Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry to deliver remarks at the group’s April 18 gala dinner. AIPAC, by contrast, got a detailed, and at times critical, speech by Biden, but no other senior administration officials.”

http://forward.com/news/national/338902/as-dems-push-boundaries-of-israel-debate-j-street-exults-and-worries/#ixzz46GsEEdd2

7) If You Lose Simone Zimmerman, You Lose the Best of Jewish Millennials, Peter Beinart, Haaretz, April 18 – “Simone Zimmerman cares about Israel. She cares about the Jewish people. She even cares about American Jewish organizations. And she believes there should be a space in those organizations for moral opposition to Israeli policies, the kind of moral opposition once offered by communal leaders like Nahum Goldmann, Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg and Rabbi Arthur Schindler. Treat people like her as the enemy and you make enemies of the best of the younger American Jewish generation. Exile those progressive young American Jews who genuinely care about the American Jewish community and watch who follows in their wake. I’m not worried about Simone Zimmerman. She’ll do fine. I’m worried about a community that punishes its children for challenging its lies.”

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.715096

8) Sorry: As Presidential Contender, Sanders Was Right to Dismiss Simone Zimmerman, Chemi Shalev, Haaretz, April 18 – “Sometimes one suspects that mainstream Jewish leaders would prefer to see the many thousands of J Street supporters and other critics of the occupation get sucked in by BDS and turn into anti-Zionists. That would justify their pigheaded refusal to look at the Jewish community in the mirror and would leave the occupation-denying, Israel-is-always-right crowd of yesteryear in their splendid isolation. Nor does Zimmerman’s dismissal detract from the validity of her views on the occupation, on Netanyahu and on the Gaza war. These are shared by many thousands around the world, including, I assume, the vast majority of Sanders’ own supporters. Running for president, however, involves compromise, a concept that sometimes seems alien to many of Sanders’ and Zimmerman’s fans. To quote a famous Israeli slogan, they would rather be right than smart, but that’s not the way one wins the presidency.”

http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/u-s-election-2016/1.715158

8 Articles Worth Reading Read More »

Ronit Elkabetz, actress and filmmaker, dies at 51

Ronit Elkabetz, one of the great luminaries of the Israeli film industry, died Tuesday morning after a private battle with cancer. She was 51.

The actress and filmmaker was known equally for her striking dark looks and immense emotional vulnerability onscreen. Her life ended just as her career flourished at an all-time high: In 2014, Elkabetz’s film “Gett: The Trail of Viviane Amsalem,” which she co-wrote and co-directed alongside her brother Shlomi Elkabetz, was awarded the Israeli Ophir Award for best film, the Jewish State’s equivalent of the Academy Award. “Gett” went on to serve as Israel’s 2014 entry for Best Foreign Language Film at the Academy Awards, and also earned a nomination for Best Foreign Language Film at the 2015 Golden Globes.

Read more at Variety

Ronit Elkabetz, actress and filmmaker, dies at 51 Read More »

Jewish-Israeli man convicted in revenge murder of Palestinian teen

A Jewish-Israeli man was convicted of the revenge murder of a Palestinian teen who he and two teenage accomplices burned to death in the Jerusalem forest.

Yosef Ben-David, 31, of Jerusalem was found guilty Tuesday in the Jerusalem District Court of the kidnapping and murder of Muhammad Abu Khdeir in July 2014. He is scheduled to be sentenced next month.

The court in February determined that Ben-David was mentally fit to be sentenced, rejecting his insanity plea that he should not be held responsible for his actions at the time of the kidnapping and murder because of a history of mental illness. The plea noted that Ben-David was under medication for his condition.

“The court has found that at the time he committed the offense, the accused was not psychotic, fully understood the facts, was responsible for his actions, had no difficulty in understanding reality and had the capacity to prevent the crime,” the Justice Ministry said in a statement released Tuesday after the conviction.

The teen’s father, Hussein, called again on Tuesday for Ben-David’s house to be razed under the same policy that calls for the destruction of the homes of Palestinian terrorists.

“We need justice from the court. Their house should be destroyed, as is done to the Arabs,” Hussein Abu-Khdeir said. “I expect that he will remain in prison for life and that he will not receive a pardon.”

The names of Ben-David’s accomplices, who were both 16 at the time of the killing, have not been released publicly. The accomplices were sentenced earlier this month: one to life in prison, the other to 21 years.

The three kidnapped Khdeir, then beat and burned him alive in the forest, soon after the bodies of three Jewish teens kidnapped and murdered by the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas were found in the West Bank.

Jewish-Israeli man convicted in revenge murder of Palestinian teen Read More »

Jerusalem gay pride parade attacker convicted of murder

The Charedi Orthodox man who stabbed six marchers at the Jerusalem gay pride parade, leaving a 16-year-old girl dead, was convicted of murder.

Yishai Schlissel, 40, was convicted on Tuesday in Jerusalem District Court for murdering Shira Banki, 16, who was marching in the July 2015 parade in support of her gay and lesbian friends. He also was convicted on six counts of attempted murder for the stabbing injuries caused to other marchers, and of aggravated assault.

Schlissel had been released from prison several weeks before the parade after serving 10 years for a similar attack at the Jerusalem gay pride parade in 2005. In the days leading up to the 2015 parade, he expressed his opposition to the parade in interviews and in ads in Charedi-Orthodox synagogues in Jerusalem and Kiryat Sefer.

Police initially turned Schlissel away at an entrance point to the parade, but he found a way in later in the route.

“The ease with which the plaintiff successfully infiltrated the parade is beyond comprehension. The writing was on the wall,” Judge Nava Ben-Or said in her ruling.

“Shira was a young, innocent, and a good-hearted person. She had hopes and dreams. The plaintiff, in his dark and cruel act, ended her life,” the judge also said.

Schlissel had eschewed legal counsel, saying the court does not recognize Jewish law, and he did not cooperate with the investigation. He was found fit to stand trial after two psychological assessments and was represented by a public defender. The prosecutor is expected to ask for a life sentence.

In February, the Jerusalem Municipality announced that it would rededicate Zion Square in downtown Jerusalem in memory of Shira. The square located on Jaffa Road adjacent to the popular Ben Yehuda pedestrian mall will be renamed Tolerance Square after it undergoes renovation.

Jerusalem gay pride parade attacker convicted of murder Read More »

Bernie Sanders and Israel’s ‘disproportionate’ use of force

There’s been much agitation recently over Bernie Sanders’ accusation that Israel used disproportionate force in Gaza during the 2014 summer war with Hamas.

In an April 1 meeting with the New York Daily News, Sanders cited Israel’s killing of more than 10,000 civilians, an inflated figure, during that conflict as evidence of Israel’s use of disproportionate force. When an interviewer looked it up and found that the United Nations estimate was 1,462 killed, the Independent senator from Vermont and Democratic presidential candidate immediately accepted the revised figure but held to his view that Israel’s actions were disproportionate.

Sanders reiterated the assertion of disproportionality during last week’s debate with rival Hillary Clinton, saying that the war wounded some 10,000 civilians. His unusually critical position on Israel has generated a great deal of commentary, both supportive and critical, especially given his Jewish background.

On Monday, JTA sent some questions to the Sanders campaign to try to drill down a bit more why the candidate believes Israel’s response was disproportionate, what he thinks the United States should have done to ensure a “more proportionate” response and whether he believes the U.S. is using disproportionate force in its own wars against terrorists in places like Afghanistan, Yemen and Syria.

The Sanders campaign declined to address JTA’s questions, instead directing us to a page on the campaign website outlining Sanders’ Mideast policies.

Here are the questions we sent the Sanders campaign:

1. Sen. Sanders has said he believes Israel’s use of force in Gaza in the 2014 conflict was disproportionate. Is that conclusion based on the militant-to-civilian Palestinian death ratio, the lopsided Israeli-to-Palestinian ratio of civilian deaths, or something else?

Israel contends that Palestinian civilian deaths largely were the result of Hamas intentionally conducting its military operations from within civilian areas – rocket launchings from residential neighborhoods, the use of a hospital as a military baseattacks from schools. Israel also contends that its own low Israeli civilian death toll was the result of its sophisticated defense systems, including its Iron Dome missile-defense system and the precautions Israeli civilians took.

Would the senator feel differently about proportionality if more Israeli civilians had been killed? Does the senator believe Israel should have held its fire in responding to rocket attacks from civilian areas? What sorts of steps does the senator believe Israel should have taken (but did not) in minimizing civilian casualties?

2. Should the United States take (or have taken during the 2014 conflict) steps to pressure Israel to use more proportionate force toward the Palestinians? Should the United States withhold some military aid to Israel to get the Israelis to shift policy toward the Palestinians? Should the United States withhold its veto in the U.N. Security Council as a means of pressuring Israel to shift its Palestinian policies? Would you, as president, consider withholding Israeli military aid or the Security Council veto?

3. Sen. Sanders has spoken several times about the disproportionality of Israel’s response in the 2014 Gaza conflict. What is his view on the proportionality on the use of American force in Afghanistan, Syria, Yemenand elsewhere? Does he believe Israel or the United States has a worse record on civilian deaths killed in military strikes?

 

Bernie Sanders and Israel’s ‘disproportionate’ use of force Read More »

BDS: Disneyland of hate

What truly puzzles the Israeli public is “Israel Apartheid Week,” being staged on several U.S. college campuses these last few weeks. A spin-off of the anti-Israel BDS   movement, its “commercial” success can best be explained as a “Disneyland of Hate.” Activists are not fighting a real struggle for their own rights or anyone else’s. Rather, this is a pretend civil rights struggle for a mediated image of a subjugated victim of an evil oppressor in faraway Occupied Land.

The story is so rife with metaphors that it has become a radical paradise: Indigenous people lived in the beautiful land of Jesus, herding sheep and growing olive trees. All of a sudden enter a bunch of crooked-nosed, conniving, colonialist Jews, armed to the teeth and backed by vast financial resources, who cheat and kill the poor victims, rob them of their land, raze their villages, and drive them away to camps. Then they build a huge wall to keep them in perpetual captivity.  The colonialists use their sinister, cutting-edge technologies to ravage their victims, extending their tentacles globally to influence politicians, the media and the public.  

This is an activist Disneyland; it's practically Star-Wars’ Evil Empire meets the Matrix. Other conflicts could be a hundred times bloodier, more oppressive, more local, but this small story is so photogenic that it hijacks them all.

For a very cheap ticket and very little risk, the activists get to be radical “Jedi” and “Neo.” At the same time, they arrogate the legitimacy to hate a distinct group of people, à la the Ku Klux Klan. Sporting a keffiyeh instead of a white sheet, they pass as bleeding-heart liberals.

In this “matrix” of their minds, continuously fed by “occupation porn” (imported from elsewhere, if necessary), they perform their futile activist-kung-fu together. It is only in the darkness of this theme park theater that Islamic jihadists, unquestioning liberal students, pseudo-academics and hippies without a cause can be found, huddled together in a hypnotic trip, appalling to any decent person with some historic perspective.

The Matrix, a post-modern, cyber-punk sci-fi trilogy, pays homage to French philosopher Jean Baudrillard by showing one of his key works, Simulacra and Simulation, for a split second. Upon seeing the film, he dismissed the gesture, and noted that the film distorts his ideas and misrepresents them.

Baudrillard actually criticizes the potential of image-generated violence, such as BDS. He describes our image-filled, post-modern existence as an endless procession of simulacra, images and representations that no longer represent anything but the story itself. With Disneyland as an example, we enter hyper-reality, with rides, monsters and characters – which barely refer to anything real.

With BDS, a movement that does not represent anything or anyone, we have a simulacrum of a civil rights movement. Hordes of “park operators” – journalists, academics, NGOs, and politicians – are buying into the simplistic and catchy Disneyland of victimhood/hate, feeding their clientele vivid imagery and narrative symbolic of oppression: white-colonialist-Nazi-apartheid vs. disenfranchised-weak-black-native, safely joining a lucrative enterprise of radical amusement.

At the same time, pro-Israel advocates keep running around those activists, trying to wake them up: “It's complicated! See? Donald isn't a real duck! The train leads nowhere, the alligators are plastic!” not realizing that Disneyland's visitors and operators are not interested in the truth. They want to stay in their reality-free “safe zones,” fantasize their activist identities, and go about their detached, indiscriminate destructive chants.

The only ones left to rot are, of course, the ordinary Palestinians and Israelis, who at best, see the prospect of constructive efforts toward a viable peace settlement fade. With no realistic engagement and no constructive guarantees for accountability and security for both sides, this Disneyland of hate will likely bring about more destruction than peace and prosperity. As Baudrillard put it: the real world crumbles with misuse.

Igal Ram is the director of Firewall Israel project at Reut Institute. Eliana Rudee is a fellow with the news and public policy group Haym Salomon Center.

BDS: Disneyland of hate Read More »

Ben & Jerry’s ice cream tycoons arrested at Washington rally

The co-founders of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream were arrested Monday during a protest outside the Capitol building in Washington, D.C.

Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield were protesting against corporate political spending at a rally that is part of the “Democracy Spring” demonstrations that have been taking place in Washington for the past week organized by Democracy Awakening.

They were charged with “unlawful demonstration activity” and later released, according to The Associated Press

Over 1,200 people have been arrested during the week’s protests, according to reports.

Ben & Jerry’s proudly tweeted the news.

In a statement posted on the company’s website, the company explained “Why Ben & Jerry Just Got Arrested.”

“It all comes down to a simple idea that we believe in whole-heartedly: if you care about something, you have to be willing to risk it all — your reputation, your values, your business — for the greater good,” the statement said.

“We all have a role to play in the fight for justice. Join us this year as we spread the word and take action. Democracy belongs in the hands of all Americans, not in the pockets of a few billionaires. And no citizen who wants to vote should ever be kept from the polls. Democracy Awakening inspired hope and created excitement that all participants will carry back home with them to their own communities,” the statement concluded.

Later on Monday, Cohen and Greenfield scooped ice cream to students on the campus of George Washington University and spoke to the students about campaign finance overhaul, The New York Times reported.

“Money in politics is really the root cause of most of the evils that confront us,” Cohen said, according to the Times. “We literally have the best Congress that money can buy.”

Ben & Jerry’s is based in Vermont and both men are supporters of Bernie Sanders, the state’s Independent senator, and his candidacy for the Democratic nomination for president.

Ben & Jerry’s ice cream tycoons arrested at Washington rally Read More »

7 things to know about the Jews of New York for today’s primary

Here’s what you need to know about the Jews of New York as the state votes in today's presidential primary.

About 1 in 10 New Yorkers is Jewish

New York state has about 1.75 million Jews, comprising approximately 9 percent of its total population of 20 million. Nearly all the Jews live in or around New York City, with 1.1 million in the five boroughs — 561,000 in Brooklyn, 240,000 in Manhattan, 198,000 in Queens, 54,000 in the Bronx and 32,000 on Staten Island, according to a landmark 2011 population study by UJA-Federation of New York. That’s more Jews than in any other city in the world, including in Israel. Another 450,000 live in suburban Westchester and Long Island’s Nassau and Suffolk counties, according to the study, and at least 130,000 Jews live in nearby Rockland and Orange counties, according to locals’ estimates and census data. Approximately one of every three non-Hispanic whites living in New York City is Jewish.

The Orthodox are growing – fast

Of the New York metro area’s 1.55 million Jews, 493,000 identify as Orthodox (that’s 32 percent), 396,000 are denominationally or religious unaffiliated (26 percent), 303,000 are Reform (20 percent) and 280,000 are Conservative (19 percent), according to the 2011 study. While the proportion of Orthodox households among Jewish households in the New York area is surging, from 13 percent in 1991 to 20 percent in 2011, the shares of Conservative and Reform households are falling – for Conservative, from 34 percent in 1991 to 19 percent in 2011, and for Reform from 36 percent in 1991 to 23 percent in 2011. Astoundingly, 61 percent of all Jewish children in the New York metro area are being raised in Orthodox households. Reflecting the growth of the Orthodox, who have an average of 4.1 children, the New York metro area has about 500,000 Jews under age 25.

New York Jews are less Democratic than Jews nationally

In almost every presidential election for the past few cycles, about 70-80 percent of the nation’s Jewish votehas gone to the Democratic candidate, and 20-30 percent to the Republican. Barack Obama won in 2012 with 69 percent of the national Jewish vote after taking 78 percent in ’08. George W. Bush won 24 percent of the Jewish vote in ’04, a rise from his 19 percent four years earlier. Nationally, 70 percent of Jews identify as Democratic or Democratic-leaning, and 22 percent as Republican or Republican-leaning.

In metropolitan New York, however, only 55 percent of Jews say they lean Democratic and 31 percent lean Republican. That’s largely because of New York’s large Orthodox population, which is more Republican than the rest of the Jewish community. Nationally, about 58 percent of haredi Orthodox and 56 percent of modern Orthodox Jews identify as Republican, compared to 27 percent of Conservative Jews and 17 percent of Reform Jews, according to the Pew Research Center’s 2013 survey of U.S. Jews.

New York Jews tend to be registered Democrats, even those who favor Republicans

The vast majority of New York City’s Jews — like all New Yorkers — are registered Democrats. That’s because in this heavily Democratic city, which hasn’t seen a competitive presidential primary election since 1988, many local elections are competitive only in the Democratic primary. With the Democratic primary winner almost guaranteed victory in the general election, registering as a Republican doesn’t really give one a chance at a meaningful vote.

This is generally true for elections for City Council (of 51 members, only three are Republicans), State Assembly (of 65 New York City districts, only one is Republican) and State Senate (of 25 New York City districts, only two are represented by Republicans). Registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by about 9 to 1 in Brooklyn, 7 to 1 in Manhattan, 6 to 1 in Queens and 13 to 1 in the Bronx. Staten Island is the exception, with only about 30 percent more Democrats than Republicans. But with just 6 percent of city residents (3 percent of the city’s Jews), this oft-forgotten borough matters little.

So even though a Republican candidate in a general election might do better among New York Jews in November than among Jews nationally, because of the high number of Orthodox Jews here (who tend to vote Republican), during the primary many of those Orthodox votes will be cast for a Democrat. Even in the city’s second-most Republican congressional district, the 10th, which includes the Hasidic stronghold of Borough Park in Brooklyn, there are 5.5 registered Democrats for every registered Republican (227,505 active registered Democrats compared to 41,640 Republicans).

Which Democrat will win among Jews?

Wall Street Journal/NBC/Marist College poll of 2,679 New York adults April 10-13 found Hillary Clinton at 65 percent and Bernie Sanders at 32 percent among likely Jewish voters. Jews comprised about 16 percent of the Democrats in that poll, and about 16 percent of all New York Democrats are Jews.

Overall, Clinton leads Sanders by about 26 points in the city and 24 points in the suburbs; they’re running roughly even upstate. Clinton enjoys a large lead among Democrats over 45, while Sanders enjoys an advantage among those under 45, first-time voters and those who describe themselves as liberal, according to the Marist poll. Overall, Clinton is favored to win the state by about 15 points, recent polls suggest.

Rabbi Menachem Genack, the CEO of the Orthodox Union’s kosher division and a well-known Orthodox proponent of Clinton, predicts that much of the Hasidic community will vote for the former secretary of state. He noted that as New York’s U.S. senator for eight years, Clinton has relationships in the community and is familiar with communal concerns.

“She was helpful to us as senator. All 14 Jewish city councilmen endorsed her. She’ll get a real commanding win in those districts with Hasidic Jews,” Genack said. “It’s about ‘hakaras hatov’” – recognizing the good she’s done for the community.

Which Republican will win the Jewish vote?

Each of the Republican candidates has spent time in recent days courting the Orthodox Jewish vote, which could play an outsize role in districts with few Republicans. Ted Cruz baked matzah with Chabad, John Kasich visited a Jewish bookstore, school and matzah factory in Borough Park (and talked about matzah’s tie to Jesus’ blood) and synagogue, and Trump invited a group of Orthodox Jewish reporters to his office. The politics blog FiveThirtyEight noted that an Optimus poll of New York Republican voters shows Trump’s lead in districts with large Orthodox populations as significantly smaller than his lead among Republicans in places like Staten Island, which are more reflective of the rest of the country. In JTA interviews with about a dozen or so Orthodox voters over the last couple of weeks, Cruz appeared to be Trump’s biggest competition.

“I vote for my values, and Cruz is my guy – definitely,” Frida Schapiro, a 68-year-old mother of 10 in Crown Heights, told JTA. “He’s as close to Torah values as I can see.”

Though New York’s Hasidic communities often are thought of as a bloc vote, insiders say that’s a myth that may be true only in more tightly controlled communities outside the city, like the all-Skverer Hasidic shtetl of New Square, in Rockland County.

“It’s not like there’s a magic button and the rebbe nods his head and 100,000 votes fall into place. It’s more nuanced that that,” said Hasidic political consultant Ezra Friedlander, who took Kasich on his Jewish Brooklyn tour. “People do have their own opinions. But there’s a certain consensus when voters see a candidate engaged and their surrogates reach out to the community.”

New York’s Jewish community is the most diverse in the world outside of Israel

While many politicians may think of Brooklyn Hasidim when they think New York Jews, the state’s Jewish population is incredibly diverse. Jews in New York are Hasidic, secular, atheist, hipster, gay, straight, transgender, Syrian, Bukharan, Russian, Israeli, rich, homeless, middle-class, poor, urban, suburban, rural, doctors, lawyers, teachers, policemen, construction workers, yeshiva students, drug addicts, in-married, out-married, unmarried, Republican, Democrat, libertarian, socialist and a million other things. One thing is certain: They are not to be ignored.

7 things to know about the Jews of New York for today’s primary Read More »

A week of Israeli-Palestinian cacophony

Headline count, midweek:

A bus explodes in Jerusalem, wounding dozens of innocent travelers.

A tunnel leading from Gaza into Israel exposed. The Prime Minister makes this an occasion for PR.

Demonstration “in support of our troops” – but really, in support of a misbehaved soldier that shot a subdued attacker in Hebron – is held in Tel Aviv.

Vice President Joe Biden, speaking at a J Street conference, expresses “overwhelming frustration” with Israel’s government.

So on the eve of Pesach, the triangle of terrorism, politics and policy is making headlines again. The tired – oh, so tired – old debate about the proper response to Palestinian violence: should Israel be more aggressive, or look more thoroughly for political arrangements?

And of course, as Vice President Biden was trying to suggest in his speech, these two are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Biden both condemned terrorism (“there is never justification for terrorism”) and Israel’s policies of expanding settlements (“the steady and systematic expansion of settlements, the legalisation of outposts, land seizures – they’re moving us, and more importantly they’re moving Israel, in the wrong direction”). But in real life, aggressive fighting and the search for political solutions are, in many cases, mutually exclusive, or at least very tricky to manage in parallel. The relative hesitation of the Binyamin Netanyahu government – its reluctance to be more aggressive, on the one hand, and its similar reluctance to buy a prescribed political process with the Palestinians – are the result of how tricky they are to maneuver.

Take, for example, the issue of the tunnels from Gaza. A few days ago, such an attack tunnel was discovered by the IDF, using new technologies. The discovery was described, somewhat bombastically, as a historic development – a breakthrough that could put Hamas tunnels out of business. Only time will tell if that’s really the case, but in the meantime the discovery of yet another tunnel, two years after the end of the last Gaza operation, immediately prompted two kinds of responses.

The first kind, by people like Minister Naftali Bennet, who made the tunnels the highlight of their criticism of government hesitation both during the 2014 operation and later, was as expected as it was well rehearsed: Bennet wants Israel to “internalize” the threat of the tunnels and respond accordingly. Hamas wants to attack Israel through tunnels and “It is Israel’s duty to restore a sense of security to citizens of the South, and prevent this from happening – at any price,” the Minister said.

The second response is also as expected as it is well rehearsed: offer Palestinians in Gaza more hope. And if not Gaza, at least in the West Bank. And if not Hamas, at least the Palestinian Authority. Give them something to work with as they attempt – and they do – to prevent attacks such as the one on the bus on Monday.

Can an Israeli government do that? In theory it can: fight terrorists with one hand, offer the olive branch in the other. In practice – this is much more complicated. When buses explode, the blood boils and the Israeli government cannot convince the public to be more conciliatory. When tunnels are discovered, the government is exposed to criticism from the right (or, in Bennet’s case, from within) for its lack of aggressiveness. If it becomes less aggressive, this can hurt it, politically speaking. If it becomes more aggressive, the Palestinian leaders become more edgy and less willing to have a calm discussion.

Well, the Bidens say, why do you have to keep building settlements? A good question, for which one answer would be: the government does not have much choice if it wants to survive. It needs its rightwing partners, and the partners have political demands. Well, the Bidens say, have a different coalition, maybe with Stav Shafir, the new political rock star. That is easier said than done, as Biden himself acknowledged unintentionally as he was congratulating Shafir by saying “may your views begin to once again become the majority opinion in the Knesset.” Or in other words: your views are currently not the majority opinion – and thus what you preach for is unfeasible.

One wonders if Biden’s remark should not be considered offensive to Israelis. Can you imagine an Israeli leader standing beside a member of the American opposition and congratulating him by uttering similar words – “may your views begin to once again become the majority opinion?” Netanyahu was criticized for much more nuanced messages. He was also criticized for less than “overwhelming frustration,” even though he is no less frustrated with the Obama administration than the Obama administration is frustrated with him.

It is a tight rope that the PM is walking this week. The aftershock of the incident in Hebron – the shameful incident in which an Israeli soldier shot a Palestinian attacker for no apparent reason – refuses to subside. Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon has to contend with political criticism because of his unapologetic and fierce condemnation of the soldier’s action. Netanyahu, more politically astute – and less morally admirable – is trying to please those Israelis who feel that the actions of the freelancing soldier are detrimental to Israel’s character and image while not alienating the many other Israelis who feel that IDF soldiers are being criticized enough from the outside to have the backing of their government even as they err in judgment.

If all this feels like cacophony that leads to no specific conclusion – it is because that’s exactly the case.

The bus bomb – so intelligence sources say – is not yet a sign of a new stage in (what is not yet) the third Intifada. It is an amateurish act of terrorism that succeeded – once in a while they do. And of course, that is no consolation to the many wounded Israelis who have years of recuperation to contend with.

The tunnels from Gaza are a means of attacking Israel. If the IDF found a solution for them, it is only a matter of time before Hamas invents something else. In the fight against the ingenuity of terrorism there is no dull moment, just a constant competition for superiority and achievement.

Support for the troops demonstrations are silly. They attest to the sense of isolation Israelis feel. Guarding the troops not against an actual enemy in battle, but rather against those who want to make sure that isolation and frustration do not lead to the fissure of morality (and, with it, of Israeli society).

And as for Biden: The Obama administration can do little to contribute in the Israeli-Palestinian arena at this point in time. If it chooses a bold act – such as passing some good-for-nothing-resolution at the UN – this will be a result not of sober policy making, but rather of a need to air its frustration in ways other than Vice Presidential speeches. That is to say: adding to the cacophony rather than putting on much needed ear plugs for the remainder of the year.

 

A week of Israeli-Palestinian cacophony Read More »

Obama to host late Passover seder this year

President Barack Obama will host a Passover seder this year, but not on either of the nights it is required according to Jewish custom.

A spokeswoman told JTA that Obama will host the seder next week following his return from travel overseas.

Obama will be in Saudi Arabia on the first and second nights of Passover, Friday and Saturday, attending a regional cooperation summit.

Obama joined a seder organized by campaign staffers in Pennsylvania during the hard-fought 2008 primary season, when he first ran for president. Since then, he has made it a custom to hold one in the White House, and include among his guests Jewish staffers and backers.

Obama to host late Passover seder this year Read More »