fbpx

April 19, 2016

Who is Simone Zimmerman?

In recent days, the name of a young Jewish woman has furiously buzzed around national media outlets. Simone Zimmerman was briefly appointed national Jewish outreach coordinator for the Bernie Sanders campaign before being suspended on April 14, just two days later. This rapid decision came after a right-wing blogger discovered that in March 2015, she had posted on Facebook a profanity-laced comment that was highly critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu; later on that day in March, she edited the post and removed the profanity. For this offense, she was widely vilified, with some politicians branding her as a dangerous anti-Israel supporter of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. Even Anti-Defamation League National Director Emeritus Abe Foxman felt compelled to step in to urge the Sanders campaign to fire her. 

The demonic image that has gained currency in the last few days bears no relationship to the Simone Zimmerman whom I know well. The question then is: Who is Simone Zimmerman?

Simone Zimmerman is a 25-year-old native of Los Angeles, daughter in a family with deep roots in the Jewish community of the San Fernando Valley. She was a member of Temple Aliyah, went to Camp Ramah and attended Jewish schools through high school. As such, she was the beneficiary of the best Jewish education that our community has to offer. In some regards, it succeeded, inculcating in her a deep and abiding connection to Judaism and Israel. And yet, in another seminal regard, this education woefully failed her. Like so many other young Jews, she was raised on the story of Israel’s unsurpassed virtue with precious little mention of the native Palestinian population or of the nearly 50-year occupation of the West Bank. (Sadly, it is similar to the Israel education that my children received, including my 15-year-old daughter, who is now on a semester-long program in Israel.) 

Who is Simone Zimmerman?

She was a deeply committed Jewish student who made her way to study at UC Berkeley in 2009, intent on joining in pro-Israel advocacy work. It was during her second semester on campus, when she got involved in the struggle against a divestment resolution directed against Israel, that she first came to hear reports of the difficult conditions in which Palestinians live under the occupation. This process of self-discovery impelled Zimmerman to move away from her early involvement in AIPAC to become a campus leader, and eventually national president, of J Street U, the campus arm of J Street. Rather than being welcomed for her stance in support of both a Jewish state and a state of Palestine, Zimmerman and her J Street U colleagues were shunned and branded by the American-Jewish establishment as disloyal and anti-Israel. But Zimmerman is a strong-willed person, and so, undeterred, she became an articulate and passionate opponent of the occupation, believing that it undoes the ethical fiber of Israel. At the same time, she opposed various BDS resolutions on the Berkeley campus, offering alternatives that condemned the occupation and called for recognition of a two-state solution. 

Who is Simone Zimmerman?

Like so many young Jewish people, she left college feeling she had nowhere to turn Jewishly. AIPAC held to a mythic and unrealistic view of Israel, the BDS cause was not her cup of tea, and simply sitting on her hands was not an option. So when the most recent Gaza war began in 2014, Zimmerman and a group of friends in New York formed a group to protest the scale of destruction and loss of life. Availing themselves of the Jewish ritual language with which they are intimately familiar, they began to recite the Mourner’s Kaddish for all victims of the violence in the Gaza conflict, both Israelis and the vastly larger number of Palestinians killed by the Israeli military. That small group, known as IfNotNow (from Rabbi Hillel’s famous line in “Pirke Avot”), has since developed into a growing movement of young Jews who seek to disrupt the somnolence of American Jews. The animating question that IfNotNow asks is very different from the question that current leaders of the American-Jewish establishment ask. The older generation, among which I include myself, returns again and again to the question: How can we preserve Zionism and the State of Israel as it currently exists? The younger generation, which is no less passionate and engaged, calls to mind progressive groups that took rise in the 1970s such as Breira and Peace Now. But the young Jews of today seek to exercise steely discipline in contending with one question: How do we bring an end to the occupation, which is not only a moral and political disaster, but an ongoing crisis for American Jewry? Rather than compound the difficulty of the task by considering a range of long-term political solutions, IfNotNow’s sole focus is to upset the status quo of opinion and deed in order to bring an end to the occupation, full stop.

Who is Simone Zimmerman?

She is the future of American Jewry. She should not have used the intemperate language or expletives she did in condemning Netanyahu. That was a mistake. But she is not willing to do what many American Jews do: Remain silently complicit as Israel’s occupation continues to trample on the rights of Palestinians and push the Jewish state closer to the brink of destruction. Marshaling all of her passion and intelligence, she is guiding and agitating her generation toward a position of moral leadership. No wonder the establishment attacks her. They see the same cracks in the old edifice that she does, but lash out in the hope of forestalling any further damage to their position. But soon, if not now, Zimmerman’s time will come.


David N. Myers is the Sady and Ludwig Kahn Professor of Jewish History at UCLA.

Who is Simone Zimmerman? Read More »

Passover and the freedom to laugh

Freedom is much on the mind of Jews around the world right now: Passover, the holiday which celebrates freedom itself, begins at sundown this evening. Freedom has many forms. There is freedom from slavery, exploitation, hunger, poverty. And freedom from willful ignorance of the world around us and from being unable to improve our lives, and the lives of others, and the life of our planet. Often overlooked, though, is freedom from lack of a sense of humor. Humor — a grace note in life – bestows levity, pleasure and a healthy perspective on the dreariness that can creep up on us.

Dreariness is inevitable, and we all have different ways of responding to it. Let’s consider two literary figures’ stance toward the drear. If Edgar Allen Poe, for example, was a stranger to dreariness, he wouldn’t have begun The Raven with: “Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered weak and weary.” Poe’s problem was that he couldn’t extract himself from those dreary midnights, and hence died soon after he was found disoriented on the streets of Baltimore, possibly drunk, certainly disoriented and definitly scorned by the literary establishment of his day. On the other hand, William Makepeace Thackeray opined that “life without laughing is a dreary blank.” Back to dreariness, but this time accompanied by a push to depart from the lackluster-ness of life, and how better than with a grin, a guffaw, or a titter.

We don’t know if Moses laughed: he was probably too busy warning Pharaoh he’d suffer another plague if he didn’t release his slaves. And 40 years wandering in the desert wasn’t the sort of trek that would put anyone in a good mood. Moses’ massive accomplishment – liberating possibly as many as two million Hebrews from bondage – was sufficient to stoop his posture, furrow his brow and silence whatever small reservoir of humor he may have (improbably) possessed.

Freedom’s responsibilities and obligations often bury the pleasures that accompany it. Freedom is a wondrous state. Reflecting on it can be an act of full, unalloyed appreciation. Which is why many haggodot (the books used at seders that tell the Passover story) dutifully state, “Anyone who discusses the Exodus from Egypt at length is praiseworthy.” They are, indeed. These (and many other) discussions can be dense and pointed or light and exultant. True freedom – not the preachy, guilt-inducing kind, but the buoyant, elevating kind – comes with the opportunity to look at life from many sides. By loosening us from our moorings and our preconceptions, humor endows our life with variety, surprise and delight. So much, in fact, that while we never quite know what’s around the corner, we greet it with a smile and either embrace it as it is or welcome the opportunity to make it better. Indeed, this is precisely the gift of humor: the harmonious balance between what is, what was and what we hope will be. Poor Poe never had it, and overworked Moses maybe never missed it. We, the heirs of liberation, have the freedom to settle on our stance toward life. Let’s try to do it with some mirth. Otherwise, the joke is on us.

Arthur J. Magida’s last book is “The Nazi Séance: The True Story of the Jewish Psychic in Hitler’s Circle.” He is writer-in-residence at the University of Baltimore.

Passover and the freedom to laugh Read More »

Russian protesters demand ban on Chabad movement

Demonstrators protesting the allocation of land to the Jewish community in the Russian city of Perm demanded the outlawing of the Chabad movement.

More than 100 people attended the rally near the area that municipal authorities in Perm, which is located 870 miles east of Moscow, designated for transfer without charge to the local Jewish community that is headed by a Chabad rabbi. They sang a song titled “Holy War,” a patriotic tune widely identified with Russia’s fight against Nazi Germany.

Unrest around the Jewish community of Perm has been brewing for years amid accusations made in 2013 that the local Jewish community made unauthorized use of a local theater. Unidentified individuals that year tried to set fire to the local synagogue.

On Saturday, the protesters showed up with signs reading “Chabad out” and “liberate us Russians from Chabad.” One protester held a placard that read “Chabad settlement is over the line: 1547,” an apparent reference to  the decision that year by Ivan the Terrible, a grand prince of Moscow, to ban Jews from entering or living in his kingdom because they “bring about great evil.”

But participants insisted they are protesting against Chabad specifically and not against Jews in general, the Russian news site Ura reported.

Boruch Gorin, a senior Chabad figure and aide to one of Russia’s two chief rabbis, Berel Lazar, said the 2013 campaign against Chabad in Perm was a thin disguise for anti-Semitism.

“The attempt to present Chabad as one thing and the Jewish community as another is false,” Gorin told JTA.

In Russia, Chabad is the largest Jewish movement with a presence in over 100 cities. Under Vladimir Putin, land has been allocated free of charge to Christian, Jewish and Muslim faith and community organizations, often as restitution of property stolen in Soviet times.

Separately, Putin on Tuesday said that “Russian Jewish organizations are making a substantial contribution in the cause of domestic political stability in Russia, for which we are very grateful” during a meeting in Moscow with Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress.

On Friday, Lazar urged Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev to stamp out anti-Semitism in government, which was a reaction to the April 10 statement on Jews by Vladislav Vikhorev, a candidate for Putin’s United Russia who is running for state lawmaker in the Legislative Assembly of Chelyabinsk Oblast, a federal region located nearly 1,000 miles from Moscow. Lazar credited Putin’s government with doing more than any of its predecessors to curb anti-Semitism.

During a debate in the city of Chelyabinsk, Vikhorev said that Jews in the 1990s were behind a “Jewish revolution that put Russian sovereignty itself on the brink of extinction,” which he said was “a well-planned, well-designed program of destruction of national culture, national education, national production and the national financial system,” according to the news website Apostroph.

Russian protesters demand ban on Chabad movement Read More »

In Europe, the far right doesn’t quite know what to make of Trump

Donald Trump’s xenophobic views are neither new nor particularly shocking in Europe, where fears of jihadism and the challenges of illegal immigration are blowing winds into the sails of a rising far right.

Although the Republican presidential hopeful’s statements on immigrants, Mexicans and Muslims are often quite moderate in comparison to the rhetoric of some popular European nationalists, Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric and anti-establishment image have earned him a certain following in European far-right circles.

“I hope Donald Trump will be the next US President,” Geert Wilders, a far-right Dutch politician whose party has for months been leading in the polls, wrote on Twitter in December. “Good for America, good for Europe. We need brave leaders.”

“I think Donald Trump is a very dangerous man,” Pieter Grun, a Wilders voter, said earlier this month at a rally here against Muslim immigration into the Netherlands.

Trump “gets it right on Islam but is so irrational that he could lead us into a nuclear war,” said Grun, who was holding up a sign reading “RapeFugees stay away, not welcome.” “I don’t want his little fingers on the trigger.”

Grun’s doubts about Trump are shared by some of the leaders of the European far right. Sweden Democrats leader Jimmie Akesson told Breitbart of Trump: “He’s great at making speeches, but as a politician and a world leader? No, I don’t think that’s a very good idea.”

Nigel Farage, the leader of Britain’s UKIP far-right party, distanced himself from Trump following the candidate’s controversial call in December for a “total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

“With this comment he’s gone too far,” Farage said, adding it would be “punishing a lot of very good people because of the actions of a few.”

Marine Le Pen, leader of France’s National Front party, had a similar message.

“Seriously, have you ever heard me say something like that?” she demanded when questioned about Trump’s statement on shutting out Muslims. “I defend all the French people in France, regardless of their origin or religion.”

Her niece, lawmaker Marion Maréchal-Le Pen – a vocal supporter of National Front’s bid to have France leave the European Union — said she found Trump’s preference for American isolationism “an interesting foreign policy.” But she called his proposed ban “stupid and completely unfeasible” during a radio interview last month.

In his stump speeches, Trump talks about building a border wall with Mexico, tells of American citizens murdered by undocumented immigrants and blames an “influx of foreign workers” for holding down the wages and contributing to high unemployment among “poor and working-class Americans.”

Trump’s anti-immigrant rhetoric resonates with more radical far-right figures, including Le Pen’s father, Jean-Marie, founder of the National Front. Jean-Marie Le Pen said in February that if he were an American, he would vote for Trump.

Ilias Panagiotaros, a lawmaker for Greece’s neo-Nazi Golden Dawn party, was so charmed with Trump he uploaded to YouTube last month a video of himself discussing Trump’s virtues. He praised Trump’s response to critics after Trump retweeted a quote by Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler’s Italian ally.

When called out by reporters for passing along the quote — “It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep” — Trump replied, “But what difference does it make whether it’s Mussolini or somebody else? It’s certainly a very interesting quote.”

Trump has another fan in Maurice Roos of The Hague, another participant in the anti-Islam rally organized earlier this month in the Dutch administrative capital by the local branch of PEGIDA — a protest movement that began in Germany in 2014 “against the Islamization of the West,” words that are part of its German-language acronym.

Trump’s inexperience in government, Roos said, “only works in his favor. Our educated, eloquent politicians have brought us to the point of bankruptcy and brought in more than a million Muslims into Europe at a time of rising Islamist terrorism. It’s time for a different school of thought.”

Tatjana Schimanski, a German senior member of PEGIDA, also spoke positively about Trump.

“He’s definitely not an intellectual on the caliber we’re used to expect from leaders in Europe,” she said, “but he’s a success story. He’s kind of a one-man PEGIDA.”

Schimanski said the politician she respects the most is Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who was educated in Oxford and has written his master’s thesis on the Polish Solidarity movement. Orban earned headlines earlier this year for attempting to block a European Union plan to force member states to shelter refugees and, tellingly, erected a fence along Hungary‘s southern border to keep them out.

The duality on Trump in far-right circles stems from the “American way in which he delivers his messages rather than from any real shock with what he’s actually saying,” said Wim Kortenoeven, a former lawmaker for Wilders’ Party for Freedom and currently a political consultant specializing in defense issues and the Middle East.

Both Wilders – who suggested the Netherlands leave the United Nations — and Trump are “into making unfeasible and radical statements to pander to voters,” Kortenoeven said. Yet Wilders and other European rightist leaders are “more ideological than Trump, with his self-aggrandizing and flaunting of his wealth,” he said, adding: “This comes off as alien, a little gauche and blunt” on a continent where philosophers are mainstream cultural icons who are invited on prime-time television talk shows.

“Like many Europeans, I fear the spread of militant Islam more than anything,” Kortenoeven said. “But I don’t think shouting empty slogans that are as inapplicable as they are stupid will help us in any way, so I don’t support Trump.”

But Kortenoeven, who used to work for Holland’s main Jewish pro-Israel group, distrusts Trump also because of Israel, he said.

“As a real-estate man, Trump, who has zero understanding of the Middle East and foreign relations, sees Israel as a real-estate problem — to sell off the minute it suits him,” Kortenoeven said.

In Europe, the far right doesn’t quite know what to make of Trump Read More »

Convoy of U.S. ambassador to U.N., Samantha Power, hits and kills boy in Cameroon

A vehicle in the motorcade of the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations struck and killed a young boy in Cameroon on Monday during a visit to the Lake Chad region where countries have been targeted by the Boko Haram group.

Samantha Power, who is visiting Cameroon, Nigeria and Chad, said the boy was hit by a vehicle in a motorcade carrying U.S., U.N. and Cameroonian officials. Medics in the convoy treated him but he died of his injuries.

“I joined the (Cameroonian) governor of the area … the leading U.N. official who manages the humanitarian and development response and Ambassador Hoza, and we visited with the boy's family to offer our profound condolences,” she said in a speech.

Power also described meeting refugees and called for financial support from the international community to aid the development of areas battered by Boko Haram.

Cameroon, Nigeria and Chad are contributing forces to fight the group. Power has been scheduled to visit the region's Multinational Joint Task Force, which is staffed with troops from the three nations as well as Niger and Benin.

The United States has sent troops and drones and offered to send a special operations mission to the fight against Boko Haram, which has pledged allegiance to the Islamic State and is believed to have killed 15,000 people.

Convoy of U.S. ambassador to U.N., Samantha Power, hits and kills boy in Cameroon Read More »

Sweden’s deputy PM says she misspoke in calling 9/11 attacks ‘accidents’

Sweden’s deputy prime minister walked back her labeling of the 9/11 attacks as “accidents” in her defense of a politician who resigned over his anti-Israel rhetoric.

Asa Romson, who is also agriculture minister, on Tuesday told the Aftonbladet daily newspaper that she misspoke a day earlier during an interview with the SVT broadcaster about the 2001 attacks in New York and Washington by the al-Qaida terrorist group. The attacks killed more than 3,000 people.

“Obviously, the attack on New York on Sept. 11, 2001 was one of the biggest attacks and acts of terror and atrocities against the peaceful and democratic world that we have seen in modern times. I don’t dispute that,” Romson told Aftonbladet. “The accident is that we got a very harsh debate on integration and on societal development with different religions side by side and subsequent discrimination.”

Romson earlier was defending the work of Mehmet Kaplan, Sweden’s Turkish-born former housing minister, with Muslim youths in the early 2000s. Kaplan, a member of Romson’s Green Party, resigned Monday following the surfacing of a video from 2009 in which he is seen saying at a rally against racism that there are similarities between the persecution of Jews by Nazi Germany during the 1930s and the everyday lives of Palestinians.

Last year, Romson apologized for comparing the deaths of migrants from the Middle East en route to Europe to the industrialized extermination of Jews at the Nazi death camp Auschwitz in southern Poland.

“We are in Europe turning the Mediterranean into the new Auschwitz,” she said during a televised debate. She walked back that comment, which she described as “ill-conceived,” after politicians and Jewish community leaders accused her of abusing the memory of Holocaust victims.

Sweden’s deputy PM says she misspoke in calling 9/11 attacks ‘accidents’ Read More »

Singapore’s prime minister makes historic visit to Israel

Making the first visit to Israel by a prime minister of Singapore, Lee Hsien Loong and his Israeli counterpart Benjamin Netanyahu discussed increasing bilateral cooperation in several areas.

The two prime ministers met privately on Tuesday morning in Netanyahu’s Jerusalem office and then held an expanded meeting with other government ministers. The meetings focused on increasing cooperation on security and trade, among other economic matters, according to a statement from the Prime Minister’s Office.

Singapore and Israel established diplomatic relations in 1969, several years after Singapore’s founding.

“We have built dynamic, prosperous economies, despite our small size and our limited natural resources,” Netanyahu said in welcoming Loong. “The economic success of Singapore, I think, inspires the entire world. The transformation of Israel to a technological powerhouse on the global scene, I think, evokes a similar admiration. Innovation and entrepreneurship have allowed us both to punch well above our weight.

“We both understand that strong economies with a very powerful incentive for enterprise are the foundations of strong countries, and our cooperation with each other has made each of us even stronger.”

Loong responded by saying that many firms in Singapore are interested in doing business with and investing in Israel, noting that some have already done so.

“Our universities and research sectors have also strong collaborations, and there are many exchanges between our institutes. But really it all started with a defense relationship,” he said. “We are very grateful to Israel that when independence was thrust upon us in August 1965, and when Singapore’s security and survival were in doubt, you helped us, the IDF helped us to build up the Singapore Armed Forces when other countries turned us down.”

Loong invited Netanyahu to make an official visit to Singapore.

On Monday, Israel and Singapore signed a memorandum of understanding authorizing cooperation between the two countries, Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement.

Singapore’s prime minister makes historic visit to Israel Read More »

Security ramped up in Jerusalem in aftermath of bombing

Security has been increased throughout Jerusalem in the wake of the bus bombing on Monday that injured 21 people.

“Extra police units and border police are patrolling public areas,” Israel Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld told the Times of Israel.

Rosenfeld cited bus stations and the light rail tram system in the city but did not specify how many reinforcements.

According to The Jerusalem Post, the municipality said the bombing will not alter plans for the tens of thousands of Jewish visitors expected to visit the Old City for Passover, which begins Friday night.

Meanwhile, one victim in critical condition may be the bomber, according to Israeli media reports. The person lost multiple limbs in the explosion, The Jerusalem Post reported Tuesday.

The reports have been neither confirmed nor denied by Israel Police and the Shin Bet security service, which are investigating the incident.

Two other victims remain in serious condition.

Rosenfeld confirmed to the Times of Israel that police officers would question the wounded and did not rule out the possibility of potential suspects among them.

“The investigation is looking to see how the explosive device was placed on the bus,” he said.

Remains of a bomb were discovered at the site of the bombing, according to the Post.

Police have placed a gag order on new details of the ongoing investigation.

The public bus was traveling in southern Jerusalem on Monday afternoon when it exploded, engulfing the nearly empty vehicle in flames. The flames scorched an adjacent bus, as well as a nearby car. The victims had burns on their upper bodies, as well as wounds from nails and ball bearings packed into the explosive device.

The attack follows a six-month wave of Palestinian stabbing and shooting attacks in Jerusalem, the West Bank and across Israel. The rate of those attacks had declined to normal levels, though Israeli officials remained concerned about a flare-up in violence surrounding upcoming religious holidays, including Passover.

Security ramped up in Jerusalem in aftermath of bombing Read More »

Tel Aviv rally for soldier accused of manslaughter draws 2,000

A Tel Aviv rally for the Israeli soldier charged with manslaughter after shooting dead a disarmed Palestinian stabber drew approximately 2,000 people on Tuesday night, according to police estimates.

The number of demonstrators at the rally in Rabin Square was considerably lower than the tens of thousands anticipated by organizers and police, according to the Times of Israel. The demonstration was to call for the release of Elor Azaria, who was indicted Monday for shooting Abdel Fattah al-Sharif last month in the tense West Bank city of Hebron, several media outlets reported.

The charge against Azaria, 19, of Ramle, marked the first time in over 10 years that an Israeli soldier has been charged with manslaughter for a killing that took place during field operations, according to Haaretz.

The case has generated considerable controversy, with some Israelis outraged that Azaria violated rules of engagement by shooting someone who was supine and unarmed, while others are outraged that he is being disciplined, particularly because Azaria has said he feared al-Sharif might be about to detonate an explosive.

In Rabin Square, demonstrators chanted “He’s a hero” and “Release the soldier,” according to Haaretz. One group of protesters held up a flag that read “We are all Kahane,” the Times of Israel reported, referring to Meir Kahane, the assassinated far-right American-born activist and Knesset member whose political party was outlawed in Israel for being racist.

Another sign said “Neutralizing terrorists — that’s the obligation of soldiers. Charges against them — that’s the crime.” A mass-produced sign that appears in a photo on the Haaretz website says “Loving the IDF. Freeing Elor.”

Several participants reportedly attacked a television reporter, who was quickly removed from the crowd by police, according to the Times of Israel. Early in the rally, police forced an activist with the B’Tselem human rights group to leave, saying they were “protecting his life and maintaining the peace.”

B’tselem, which is known for its advocacy on behalf of Palestinians in the West Bank, filmed and released the video showing Azaria shooting al-Sharif.

Azaria’s parents both addressed the rally from the stage.

His mother, Oshra, who earlier this week published an open letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pleading for her son’s release, said of her son, according to Haaretz, “I raised you on the values of morality and patriotism. From a young age you wanted to be combat soldier and give back to your country. I pray that we will be able to have Passover seder together.”

In anticipation of the protest, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told media, “I am convinced that the examination of the event in Hebron will be done responsibly and rationally. Our soldiers are not murderers. They operate against murderers and I hope that the way will be found to find a balance between the act and the overall context of the event. In the meantime, I suggest we all lower the flames.”

Israeli rapper Subliminal and singer Moshik Afia were expected to perform at the protest.

Opposition leader Isaac Herzog of the Zionist Union party described the rally as a “protest by the far right” and called on the soldier’s family “not to turn this difficult and complicated incident into a campaign against the IDF.”

According to Ynet, many demonstrators showed up wrapped in Israeli flags and some chanted racist slogans.

Tzipi Livni, a Knesset member from Zionist Union, criticized the rally.

“We live in a country where we don’t hang people in the city squares and we don’t acquit them in the city squares,” she said. “Justice will prevail in the courtroom.”

Tel Aviv rally for soldier accused of manslaughter draws 2,000 Read More »

What Simone Zimmerman represents about millennial Jewry

On April 12, Simone Zimmerman, a Los Angeles Jewish day school graduate and UC Berkeley alumna, was named head of Jewish outreach for Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign, a dream job for a young, politically active, liberal American Jew. Then, on April 14, Zimmerman was suspended by the campaign. 

Zimmerman’s downfall, her #IStandWithSimone supporters have argued on social media and in online opinion pieces, was not ultimately the fault of the Sanders campaign, but, rather, brought on by the Jewish-American establishment. They see the establishment as intolerant of millennial Jews who view Israel differently than what they were taught by their parents, teachers, rabbis and even their summer-camp counselors. 

The Sanders campaign offered no official reason for the suspension, but it followed the revelation of a screenshot of a profanity-laden Facebook post by Zimmerman from March 2015 (which she later edited) in which she said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “sanctioned the murder of over 2,000” Palestinians in the 2014 Gaza war. Zimmerman had also penned an op-ed published by JTA in May 2013 that criticized Hillel International for refusing to sponsor speakers or partner with organizations that support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

Zimmerman’s posts were first revealed by Noah Pollak, a conservative Jewish journalist at the Washington Free Beacon, and they came in the wake of a Sanders’ comment to the New York Daily News, in which he mistakenly called the number of civilian fatalities in the most recent Gaza war 10,000, instead of the accepted number, which is fewer than 2,000, an error he later corrected.

Pollak’s piece and others like it led to a torrent of criticism against Sanders from mainstream Jewish leaders, including from Anti-Defamation National Director Emeritus Abe Foxman, who told Jewish Insider, “Bernie Sanders needs to fire Simone Zimmerman.” 

After the suspension, a counter-response erupted, led most prominently by Peter Beinart writing for Haaretz, along with bloggers at +972 Magazine and Mondoweiss, organizations such as Jews for Racial & Economic Justice and the Foundation for Middle East Peace, as well as many young American Jews taking to Twitter and Facebook.

What those 48 hours revealed — aside from being an embarrassment and distraction for the Sanders campaign — is a divide between mainstream Jewish America and a growing number of millennial Jews raised within those institutions. These young Jews now reject key elements of the narrative they were taught about Israel and are actively trying to change how American Jewry talks about and teaches the Israel-Palestinian conflict. These young activists consider America’s mainstream Jewish community as complicit in what they see as Israel’s immoral occupation of the West Bank.

From New Jew and Ramah to Berkeley and J Street U

Zimmerman’s adolescence in Los Angeles included summers at Camp Ramah, participation in the Conservative movement’s United Synagogue Youth, trips to Israel and study at what was then known as New Jewish Community High School (now deToledo High School), where her mother, Elana, serves on the board, according to the school’s website.

Zimmerman did not respond to requests for an interview, but in an interview in May 2015 in the American Jewish Peace Archive (AJPA), Zimmerman said her views on Israel changed while she was an undergraduate at UC Berkeley. 

During her freshman year, Zimmerman joined the campus Israel Action Committee, a pro-Israel student group, but became disillusioned during a 2010 student government debate over a bill pushed by the BDS movement that won approval. When she attended AIPAC’s policy conference that year in Washington, D.C., she told AJPA, pro-Israel Berkeley students were told they should seek more power in student government and reverse the BDS vote. Eventually, Berkeley’s student body president vetoed the BDS bill, which led to two more heated student government meetings.

At those meetings, Zimmerman told AJPA, she was “floored by the stories” told by divestment advocates — one speaker told of relatives in the Gaza Strip who heard bombs falling during Israel’s 2008 war against Hamas; another said he had been beaten up at an Israeli checkpoint in the West Bank. Zimmerman said she brought her questions to Hillel, but found people there “were really scared to talk about the actual hard questions.” She was also moved by a much-discussed article in the New York Review of Books by Beinart, titled “The Failure of the American Jewish Establishment,” in which he criticized AIPAC and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, among others, for abandoning the “liberal values they profess to admire” by ignoring Israel’s presence in the West Bank and the Palestinians’ plight.

In Israel during the summer of 2010, Zimmerman said she “witnessed for the first time Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinians.” And during her sophomore year at Berkeley, she met an organizer for J Street U, the campus arm of J Street, a “pro-Israel, pro-peace” lobby. She launched at Berkeley one of J Street U’s earliest campus chapters, and rose to become the organization’s national president in 2012-13. During her senior year, even as she and J Street U opposed another BDS bill put before Berkeley’s student government, Zimmerman tried and failed to negotiate an alternative bill calling for a two-state solution. During that effort, she said she found that pro-Israel advocates on campus wanted to “prevent any sort of public criticism and condemnation of Israel” when it came to its West Bank presence. 

After graduating, Zimmerman moved to New York. Soon after, in the summer of 2014, Israel responded to months of rocket attacks from Hamas with a seven-week targeted bombing campaign against Hamas terrorists and weapons caches, including a ground invasion to destroy cross-border terror tunnels. According to the U.N. Human Rights Council, the war killed 1,464 Palestinian civilians, and about 800 Hamas fighters. On the Israeli side, six civilians and 66 soldiers died. The imbalance in the number of casualties fueled accusations against Israel of “disproportionate” use of force, even as Hamas openly targeted Israeli population centers and was revealed to operate and stockpile weapons in Palestinian civilian neighborhoods. 

The 2014 Gaza War also became a catalyst for progressive American Jews like Zimmerman who were angered, among other complaints, by what they saw as the American-Jewish establishment’s indifference toward the suffering of Gaza’s civilians. Zimmerman and a handful of other young Jews formed a group in the summer of 2014, during the war, called IfNotNow, holding vigils outside of the Conference of Presidents’ headquarters in Manhattan, reciting Kaddish as they read the names of Palestinians and Israelis killed.

IfNotNow vigils during the war spread to nearly a dozen other cities and, in addition to demanding an end to the war, the expanding group called on mainstream Jewish institutions to end “support for the occupation,” and to promote a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that includes “freedom and dignity for all.”

IfNotNow 

Today, IfNotNow has three full-time staffers, and operates in New York City; Washington, D.C.; Boston; Philadelphia; the San Francisco Bay Area; and Chicago. It is currently planning to conduct a training session in Los Angeles in late May, and has also held vigils and other actions in St. Louis; Providence, R.I.; Pittsburgh; and Detroit. Most recently it held “liberation seders” in five cities, including Washington, D.C., where on April 19 members protested in front of Hillel International’s headquarters, blocking its front entrance. The pre-Passover protests were part of IfNotNow’s first “National Week of Action.”

Yonah Lieberman, 25, one of the group’s leaders based in Brooklyn, N.Y., said 250 people have gone through IfNotNow’s two-day training sessions during the past four months.

He said the group trains its members in IfNotNow’s narrative, its structure (unified but decentralized) and the “momentum theory of organizing,” a strategy combining tactics from community organizers, mass mobilizers and civil resistance movements.

The group’s website decries an “out-of-touch” Jewish establishment, saying it doesn’t represent American Jewry when it comes to Israel. But IfNotNow also says it does not seek to destroy the establishment, but rather to transform it.

“We are not trying to destroy the community. We are not trying to destroy the establishment,” Lieberman said. “There are a lot of really great things that the Jewish mainstream establishment does for the community. All those great things are overshadowed by the very public support for the occupation.”

Like Zimmerman, Lieberman is the product of a mainstream Jewish upbringing. He grew up in Washington, D.C., attended the pluralistic Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School (graduating one year after this reporter), went to Habonim Dror Camp Moshava in northern Maryland — a kibbutz-style Zionist summer camp — and spent three months of his high school years on an exchange program in Israel at the Alexander Muss High School in Hod HaSharon. He said that in high school, he felt there were “inconsistencies” between the Jewish values he was taught and Israeli treatment of Palestinians, but it wasn’t until he became a student at the University of Michigan that he found the language to describe it.

“The word ‘occupation’ didn’t enter my lexicon until college, maybe freshman or sophomore year,” Lieberman said. “In college, it was a pretty classic story of learning about the realities of the occupation and learning about the way that our community was supporting the occupation.”

Lieberman created J Street U’s University of Michigan chapter and joined the group’s national board during his senior year. He says J Street is still his “political home,” while he calls IfNotNow his “movement home.” 

“There’s an entire generation that’s rising up right now, that’s trying to speak with the values we’ve been taught by our community, and there’s an out-of-touch establishment that’s trying to silence people like Simone,” Lieberman said. “We don’t want to be part of a community where the only way to be part of the community is to either shut up and toe the party line on Israel, or to leave the mainstream community and form your own small community. We don’t want that to be Judaism.”

Ethan Miller, another IfNotNow leader based in Washington, D.C., echoed Lieberman’s goals of improvement, not destruction, and of “proudly standing up for the values we were taught, the Jewish values of tikkun olam and the equality of human value.”

“What really unites us is our desire for being Jewish, and being Jewish shouldn’t necessitate support of the occupation,” said Miller, who grew up attending Hebrew school and Congregation Tikvat Israel, a Conservative synagogue in Maryland.

As an example of the “one-sided” discussion, he cited the sharp negative reaction to Sanders’ interview with the New York Daily News.

“Recently we saw a debate about how many people were killed in the last war,” Miller said, “but nobody in the established Jewish community stopped to question — what about the fact that people died in the first place?”

Beinart worked with Zimmerman on his now-defunct Daily Beast blog Open Zion. He points out that millennial Jews like Zimmerman are not checking out or disengaged from Israel or Judaism. Rather, “the world that Simone comes from … is disproportionately made up of people from more traditional backgrounds, because they are the ones that care.”

A vision for peace? 

Asked whether IfNotNow is committed to preserving Israel as a Jewish state, Lieberman said the group’s focus is on the American Jewish community, not the political debate of one state versus two states, or pro-BDS versus anti-BDS. Impacting their own community, Lieberman said, is “what we, as American Jews, have power over.”

“I think that Zionism is this big loaded word, and it’s been used by the establishment and by the mainstream to kind of create red lines about what you can and cannot say or who can and cannot be part of the community,” Lieberman said. 

Not all of the group’s individual members agree on all issues — Miller, for example, said he sees a Jewish state as part of any solution. Yet the members of IfNotNow are united in their focus on convincing the American Jewish establishment that “the occupation is not necessary for Jews to be safe,” as Lieberman put it. They also want their voices included in the larger conversation.

“We want a Judaism where the mainstream institutions will allow anyone, no matter what their beliefs about the occupation, to be part of the community and take leadership within the community,” he said.

IfNotNow’s choice not to debate the political solution is, according to UCLA Jewish history professor David N. Myers, a significant difference between young Jewish progressives and those in their parents’ generation. Myers, whose daughter is a close friend of Zimmerman’s, hosted a parlor meeting two months ago for IfNotNow, introducing them to veteran local liberal philanthropists. 

“The older generation in this meeting really wanted to know, ‘What’s your take on Israel and a two-state solution?’ ” Myers said. “And it really became clear to me, while that is the question of my generation, the 50-somethings and ups … that’s not the question that IfNotNow asks. They ask, ‘How have we tolerated the occupation?’ ”

Rabbi Noah Farkas of Valley Beth Shalom has known Zimmerman since her senior year at New Jewish Community High School; he said he spoke with her the day after her suspension from the Sanders campaign.

“I think Simone does represent a significant and, in some ways, growing population of younger Jews who felt like maybe they were in the dark a little bit,” Farkas said. Young American Jews go on pro-Israel Birthright or March of the Living trips, and find themselves unprepared for the anti-Israel “vitriol that happens on college campuses,” Farkas said.

“They learn things and experience Israel in a different way, experience a very well-organized and very well-funded BDS movement that is specifically taking a strategic tack to make them feel bad about their Jewish education and their Jewish heritage.” 

Farkas stressed the difference between Jews like Zimmerman and those who “place squarely” the blame for the situation in Israel and the West Bank on the Israelis. “That’s not coming from a place of love,” he said. 

He also criticized mainstream Jewish figures who “[moved] to an ad hominem personal attack” against Zimmerman. “When you use words like ‘ugly’ or ‘self-hating’ or ‘anti-Semite,’ it doesn’t benefit anyone,” Farkas said.

Farkas sees Simone Zimmerman and others like her in American Jewry not as a threat to the establishment but as evidence that, despite differences, the existing institutions have succeeded in inculcating a love and concern for Israel in the next generation.

“Sometimes when you love something so deeply, you also want it to be better than it is,” Farkas said. “It would be un-nuanced to say it’s just the anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian narrative that is driving our kids away. We do have some responsibility in that conversation.”

What Simone Zimmerman represents about millennial Jewry Read More »