fbpx

March 25, 2016

The logic of sacrifice: Parashat Tzav (Leviticus 6:1-8:36)

Have you ever noticed that at the center of the Torah is a cookbook? 

Until we get to the Book of Leviticus, we read the epic story of the Jewish people. From creation to liberation to covenant, we follow the rise of a family that became a nation. Really great stuff. 

And suddenly, when we scroll down (yes, I know the pun), we find recipes for the various types of sacrifices offered in the ancient Tabernacle. Leviticus teaches us which parts of the animal to cook on the altar for which type of offering and how to share some of the cooked meat with the priests. 

We are told how much flour and oil to use. We are told what clothes to wear in the holy kitchen of the Tabernacle. In the center of our most epic story right at the foot of Mount Sinai, the Book of Leviticus is a manual for sacred cooking, bringing a whole new dimension to the old adage, “They tried to kill us, we won, let’s eat.” 

These sacrifices, the sacred recipes, which are found mainly in our Torah portion Tzav, are not just an ingredient list for a Sunday barbecue, however. They are the Torah’s way of teaching us about how to encounter God through prayer. 

Many of us modern Jews have a really hard time connecting to prayer as it is. Services tend to be long and lack a certain sense of spiritual drama. Many of us don’t know Hebrew, and even for those who do, it remains arcane and mystifying. So we try to find meaning in one another through social gatherings and events that mark the passage of time. 

But there is more to prayer than friendship, more inside of us than the celebration of ourselves. Here is where the logic of sacrifice truly matters, and why Leviticus is so important to the Torah and to us. 

In our common culture, the idea of sacrifice means giving up something important. The soldier who jumps on a grenade and gives up his life to save others is rightly lauded for his courage and conviction. We call his valor a sacrifice for his country. 

The Torah has a different but related understanding of sacrifice. Hebrew University professor Moshe Halbertal teaches that the Torah’s notion of sacrifice is not a giving up, but a giving to. Leviticus, our holy cookbook, is not about giving up something of ourselves in order to be Jewish or to get right with the universe. It’s about bringing a gift to God because there is something in our souls that feels the need to participate in something self-transcendent and to draw close to the primordial rhythm of the world. 

There are times when each of us makes a mistake in our relationships or business dealings, when we stray from being the person we always thought we were. We all experience that time when the world feels a little different, when it vibrates on a different level. That feeling of not being at home in our own skin calls for a response. In Parashat Tzav, those feelings are harmonized through the intimacy of giving the gift of sacrifice. 

The Book of Leviticus teaches that when you come to pray, to give the gift of sacrifice, you are not alone in your agony. You are not alone in your feelings of guilt. You are not alone when you are sinful. There is a partner to receive your gift. There is a place where you can go to get back into the spiritual rhythm. There is a path to drawing close to the Transcendent through the act of offering. The logic of sacrifice tells us that prayer actually matters, not because we can magically change our situation, but because we can connect to the world by becoming holier, better people. 

What if we were to construe our lives as an offering? Instead of organizing our lives around what we can get out of it, we can ask ourselves what we can give back. Instead of focusing only on what we need, we can focus on the needs of others. Instead of thinking of ourselves as receivers, thinking of ourselves as givers. Instead of celebrating our own achievements, we can lift up the lives of others. 

That’s the logic of sacrifice. We give up nothing in order to become holy, but when we give to something greater, we can connect with God, to be holier, and transcend the self and find a way back to goodness again. 

There is great spiritual energy and strength found in Leviticus. It is not merely a collection of arcane rituals. It is a manual of human connection at the moments we need it most. This section of the Torah ends by summarizing the lists of sacrifices. “This is the Teaching [literally “Torah”] of the transcendent offering, the meal offering, the sin offering, the guilt offering, the ordination offering, and the well-being offering” (Leviticus 7:37). 

I like to think of it this way: “This is the Torah that helps us transcend, sustains us, expiates our misgivings, draws us out of depression, charges us with purpose and focuses our lives on giving rather than taking.” It is not just a cookbook for the priestly cult; it’s a recipe for a flourishing life.


Rabbi Noah Farkas is a clergy member at Valley Beth Shalom in Encino, founder of Netiya and the author of “The Social Action Manual: Six Steps to Repairing the World” (Behrman House).

The logic of sacrifice: Parashat Tzav (Leviticus 6:1-8:36) Read More »

Wakeup call to US Jewry

The AIPAC conference opened few days ego is one of the most important conventions of the Jewish communities in the US. It has always been regarded as one of most focal events that Israeli leaders – especially the prime minister – regularly attended. There they would present Israel’s case and their views while expounding what has to be done in order to make sure that Israel continues to prosper. They would ask for the continued approval, support and cooperation of American Jewry.

But this year, for reasons unknown, Bibi Netanyahu did not bother to take part in the convention: he did not go to the US, he even cancelled (at the last moment) a pre-arranged meeting with President Obama.

It seems that Bibi is absolutely certain that no matter what he does, he has the support of American Jews; he takes it for granted because he is the Jewish state Prime Minister. He even completely ignores the effect of his behavior on the Jewish American community.

So I’d like to put a few questions to AIPAC leaders:

How did it come about that universities with a very large number of Jewish students became out-of-bounds for the representatives of the state of Israel?

How did it become easier to wave an ISIS flag in Berkeley than an Israeli flag?

Can it all be explained by antisemitism, which has always been around? Or could it be that the conduct of the Israeli government and its action are not in keeping with the Jewish values on which you brought up your children?

How could you let a prime minister offend your president? It was so clear that such move not only would not be useful – it would be downright detrimental.

Can you imagine that all members of the Israeli Knesset will be present when the prime minister of a foreign country comes to make a speech against our PM’s policies? Did you not see the insult of the symbol of your country which has always supported Israel and still supports it as a proper action which promotes Israel?

Why did you not stand up and say ‘No more’? What did AIPAC gain from this maneuver? What did Israel gain? We all lost, big-time.

How can you support a government which is disdainful of the way you chose, most of you, to practice your Jewish faith?

The danger now does not center on the decrease in public support for Israel in the US and the Jewish community. The danger is that your sons’ generation will cut themselves off not just from the state of Israel but from the Jewish values they grew on; because when you blindly support a policy which is the opposite of Jewish values, this is the inevitable result.

Whenever I talk to Jewish audiences around the world I notice their reluctance to ask difficult questions or voice doubts; when I encourage them to speak up they tell me that when they do so they are usually told by Israelis that they have no right to criticize, since “neither you nor your children have served in the IDF or lived on the border so don’t tell us what to do”.

It is then that I go back to the Declaration of Independence and say that the state of Israel’s right to exist stems only from that dream-come-true to realize the Jewish people historical right to live in a state of their own and stress that they have the duty to fight for the character of that Jewish home so that it is suits all the Jews who believe in Jewish values.

Now is the time for you to express your opinion because it is important and it counts no less than mine or that of other Jewish inhabitants of the state of Israel.

The danger looms over all of us. Without strong support of Jewish congregations around the world but especially in the United States, Israel is a state whose national security is deficient, while in any place in the world a Jewish congregation without a principled, strong Jewish state, will go back to be a persecuted congregation whose continued existence is uncertain.


Brig. Gen (Res) Asaf Agmon initiated and planned the rescue operations of Ethiopian Jews with the IAF Hercules planes during Operation Solomon. He has also been awarded the highest decoration of the IAF commander for extraordinary professionalism over enemy territoryn. Currently Agmon is leading the Nature Defense Force project, aiming to create a cultural revolution in the IDF  to safeguard the unique environment and nature of Israel. Agmon is also the founder of several hi-tech and technology companies and sits on the board of directors of the Ramat Gan College for Law and Business.

Wakeup call to US Jewry Read More »

After Trump at AIPAC, rejecting hate and standing up for our values

When I marked my calendar for the 2016 AIPAC Policy Conference, I didn’t expect that the agenda would include a text study on leadership and human dignity in the hallway of the Verizon Center. But that’s where I found myself on Monday night, with other members of the Reform Movement, while Donald Trump spoke to thousands of pro-Israel attendees inside the arena.

I have been a supporter of AIPAC for more than thirty years and always look forward to joining with thousands of Americans who prize the vital relationship between the United States and Israel at Policy Conference. The activists there transcend party lines and religious boundaries, and their message is clear: America and Israel are stronger and more secure when they work together to pursue our shared interests.

This year was utterly different. And utterly disappointing.

One of the highlights of every Policy Conference is the opportunity to hear from our elected leaders and presidential candidates. On Monday, I heard strong messages in support of Israel from all of the presidential candidates who addressed the conference.

Yet for many of us, this message of unity was also accompanied by deep anguish over Donald Trump’s appearance at the conference. I understand AIPAC’s strategy of engaging with all presidential candidates and its decision to invite Mr. Trump. At the same time, I refuse to accept his hateful comments against women, Mexicans, people with disabilities, Muslims and others. His campaign has thrived on fear and resentment. Such divisive rhetoric has no place in a pluralistic democracy as vibrant as ours.

As a religious movement, we do not endorse or oppose political candidates. Still, along with several other rabbis and lay leaders, I decided that I had to register my opposition and growing concern with the tone, rhetoric, and violence that have come to define Donald Trump’s campaign by not staying in the arena when he spoke.

I respect those who chose to stay in the room. Some were surely drawn by the spectacle.  Others stayed because they felt it necessary to hear and see Mr. Trump, whose rhetoric we may find intolerable, but nonetheless could lead our government.

Still, the response in the room to Mr. Trump was deeply discouraging. Some parts of Mr. Trump’s speech were so disparaging to President Obama that AIPAC had to issue an unprecedented apology the next day.

AIPAC does not represent the entire Jewish community. No one organization does. Yet, each year the media and political establishment scrutinize the reception that candidates receive at Policy Conference.

I fear the strong, positive message that was clearly sent by the nearly 18,000 people appreciatively clapping, laughing, and offering repeated standing ovations for Mr. Trump. That blasé attitude in the face of bigotry does not represent the American Jewish community. Despite the several thousand cheering in the arena, hundreds of thousands, if not millions of Jews across America reject the divisive and hurtful messages that have been central to Mr. Trump’s campaign. As a community, we know what it is to be targeted because of our faith and to be treated unfairly. We know what it is to experience a dearth of compassion.

As this presidential campaign continues, people of good will have a responsibility to resoundingly reject disrespect and xenophobia coming from any candidate. We must lift our voices in support of inclusion, equality and the dignity present within every individual. 

The Reform Movement has sent a letter to Mr. Trump asking for an urgent meeting, and I hope that our leaders will soon have the direct opportunity to make sure our concerns are clear. Mr. Trump has significant work to complete in repairing the damage done by his words – a brief apology or clarification will fall short.

When a candidate abandons our shared commitment to the spirit of pluralism that underpins our democracy and engages in hateful rhetoric, we must speak out. Though I am appalled by what I saw and heard at AIPAC, I have the utmost faith in our community’s ability to respond to the moral imperatives our tradition sets out, even in this fraught election season.

Rabbi Pesner is the Director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism.

After Trump at AIPAC, rejecting hate and standing up for our values Read More »

2016 Election Blog #15: New Poll Confirms Jewish Affinity for the Democratic Party

As each presidential campaign unfolds, there are always news stories and editorials suggesting that a “shift” is underway among Jewish voters. In today’s newest Gallup poll, once again Jewish Americans appear to remain solidly embedded within their traditional political base, the Democratic Party:

According to the Jewish Insider, the key findings confirm the following:

“The poll, conducted January 2 to March 21, showed that 72 percent of Jewish Americans have an unfavorable view of both Cruz and Trump.
24 percent see Trump as favorable, while only 20 percent have a favorable opinion of Cruz. Ohio Governor John Kasich is the only Republican presidential candidate who has a positive image among Jewish Americans (45/28 favorable/unfavorable).

Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is viewed most favorable (61/30), although Hillary Clinton’s net favorability rating is just a few points lower (60/35).

According to Gallup, 64% of American Jews identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party, while 29% identify with or lean toward the Republican Party.” [1] 

In a related development the number of Jews who identify with the Democratic Party however appears to be diminishing:

“The number of American Jews who identify as Democrats dropped by 10 percent over the past seven years, according to survey results released by Gallup.

Meanwhile, the number of Jews identifying as Republicans has increased slightly but remains little changed overall.

Sixty-one percent of American Jews identified as either Democrats or Democratic-leaning in 2014, down from 71% in 2008, while 29% counted themselves in the Republican camp, the survey released on Tuesday found.”[2]
 

In analyzing this decline, it would be appropriate to consider several factors. The President’s approval ratings amongst American Jews has been declining for some period of time, and this factor certainly has contributed to the decline in party affiliation.

Secondly, the rise in instances of terrorism both here and abroad has sparked a heighten concern around national security that may have drawn some Democrats to endorse various Republican candidates.

Generational and demographic factors certainly have altered over time the Jewish liberal orientation. More directly, the rise of American Orthodox Jewish voters as a growing constituency has helped to reshape the political landscape within the Jewish community.

[1] [2] Dr. Steven Windmueller is the Rabbi Alfred Gottschalk Emeritus Professor of Jewish Communal Service at the Jack H. Skirball campus of the Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, Los Angeles. His collection of writings can be found on his website: 2016 Election Blog #15: New Poll Confirms Jewish Affinity for the Democratic Party Read More »

Senior Brussels rabbi: Belgian authorities know nothing about security

Amid revelations of perceived failures in Belgium’s handling of terror threats, a prominent rabbi from Brussels said Belgian authorities “have no understanding of security issues.”

Rabbi Menachem Hadad of Brussels’  Shomre Hadas haredi Orthodox community made the remarks in an interview Thursday with Israel’s Army Radio about concerns that Belgium lacks the counterterrorism capabilities of other Western European countries grappling with home-grown jihadism of the kind on display on Tuesday, when a series of explosions in Brussels killed 32 people.

Hadad said that soldiers who were posted outside a synagogue and the city’s Chabad House following the slaying of four Jews in Brussels’ Jewish Museum of Belgium in 2014 told him that for months, they used to guard the area with no bullets in their rifles. “It was just a show. It’s not normal,” he said.

Hadad’s rebuke follows reports of omissions in how Belgian authorities handled security issues, including a failure to follow up on warnings by Turkey about one of the perpetrators of Tuesday’s attacks.

Belgium’s interior and justice ministers on Thursday offered to resign.

Belgium’s counterterrorism abilities are limited by a constitutional ban on ethnic profiling and other laws, including a ban on home searches between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m.

Following the attacks, Israel’s intelligence minister, Israel Katz, said at the Knesset that, “If Belgians continue eating chocolate and enjoying life and looking like great democrats and liberals, and not noticing that some of the Muslims there are planning terrorism, they won’t be able to fight them.”  His remark was widely criticized as undiplomatic and insensitive in Belgian media.

Senior Brussels rabbi: Belgian authorities know nothing about security Read More »

Can Belgium protect its Jews? A community has its doubts

The hundreds of rifle-toting police and soldiers who patrol Isaac Michaeli’s neighborhood have done little to improve his sense of safety.

“When the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing, the soldiers might as well be cardboard cutouts,” he said.

A jeweler in his 40s, Michaeli lives with his family in Antwerp’s Jewish quarter, a small neighborhood of 12,000 that is one of the largest haredi communities in Europe.

The troops have been assigned to protect the neighborhood, with its 98 Jewish institutions, since May 2014, after four people were killed in a terrorist shooting at Brussels’ Jewish Museum of Belgium. Since then, their presence has been beefed up at periods of elevated risk — including after Tuesday’s string of terrorist attacks that left at least 31 dead and 300 wounded in Brussels.

Belgian Jewish leaders have praised the patrols and the government allocation of $4.5 million for the community’s protection. But amid reports of repeated failures in Belgian authorities’ counterterrorist efforts, Michaeli’s dismissive attitude is shared by other Belgian Jews. Many feel that their government is less competent in defending civilians, Jews and otherwise, than its neighbors, including France.

On Thursday, Menachem Hadad, a Brussels rabbi, told Israel’s Army Radio, “Belgian authorities have no understanding of security issues — zero.” He said soldiers posted outside a synagogue and the city’s Chabad House told him that for months, they used to guard the area with no bullets in their rifles. “It was just a show. It’s not normal,” he said.

Responding to Hadad’s claim, a Belgian Defense Ministry spokesperson wrote in an email to JTA that the soldiers posted in Brussels “are adequately armed and trained,” adding the ministry is nonetheless looking into the claims about the synagogue and Chabad House.

In Antwerp this week, hundreds of soldiers and police patrolled the Jewish quarter, where children wore costumes for Purim. One of a handful of European cities where the Jewish holiday is celebrated on the street, Antwerp’s Purim event this year paled in comparison to previous ones. Revelers were prohibited from playing music, wearing masks and using toy guns to avoid alarming soldiers and offending a grieving nation.

“We celebrate but we are broken,” said Mordechai Zev Schwamenfeld, 57, a member of Antwerp’s prominent Belz Hassidic community. Holding a basket of sweets he was delivering to friends – a Purim custom — he noted that two Belz yeshiva students were lightly wounded in the Brussels attacks. “It affects everyone, we’re not in a bubble,” he said.

Jewish children in Antwerp, Belgium, dressed as soldiers on Purim, March 24, 2016. Photo by Cnaan Liphshiz

Following the attacks, Belgium’s interior and justice ministers offered to resign over the alleged failure to track one of the attackers, an Islamic State militant, Ibrahim El Bakraoui, expelled by Turkey last year. He blew himself up at Brussels airport on Tuesday. An accomplice suicide bomber struck a subway station less than an hour later. Authorities are hunting for more accomplices, who they fear might strike again, possibly at Jewish targets.

Turkey said it warned Brussels specifically about El Bakraoui. According to Haaretz, Israel told Belgium just weeks ago that an attack was planned at the airport. European Union security agencies recommended airport security measures that were not implemented, according to reports.

The attackers also struck at obvious targets when officials should have been on high alert, said critics. Just four days before the attacks, authorities in Brussels arrested Salah Abdeslam, an Islamist alleged to have participated in a series of terrorist attacks in Paris in November.

The arrest, too, led to charges of incompetence. After four months on the run, Abdeslam was found on March 18, hiding a couple thousand feet from his parents’ home. He escaped police several times, including in November, thanks to regulations prohibiting home searches between 11 p.m. and 5 a.m. Having confirmed his whereabouts after midnight, police found an empty apartment in the morning.

Albert Guigui, the chief rabbi of Belgium, said that despite these apparent lapses, “Belgian authorities are now doing all they can following the trauma at the museum.” The attack on the unguarded building in 2014 prompted authorities to significantly beef up security “in an unprecedented way,” Guigui said. But asked whether Belgian authorities have the desire and the ability to stop attacks, he said: “I don’t know, I’m not a security expert. I’d like to believe so.”

Guigui’s hedged response differs markedly from that of French Jewish leaders. The heads of CRIF, France’s Jewish umbrella group, have often proclaimed their “utter confidence” in authorities’ ability to combat terrorism and protect the community against jihadism.

“I wouldn’t say I have full confidence,” said Joel Rubinfeld, founder of the Belgian League Against Anti-Semitism and a former president of the CCOJB umbrella of French-speaking Belgian Jewish communities. But after a long period of half-measures, he said, authorities took “robust steps to secure Jewish sites in 2014. It’s a positive step for which we are grateful.”

Amid increases in anti-Semitic incidents and a worsening sense of personal safety, immigration to Israel from Belgium has increased dramatically over the past five years.

People gather to show solidarity with the victims of the Paris attacks in Tel Aviv’s Rabin Square, Nov. 14, 2015. Photo by Lior Mizrahi/Getty Images

Last year, 287 Jews immigrated to Israel from Belgium, which has a Jewish population of about 40,000. It was the highest figure recorded in a decade. From 2010-2105, an average of 234 Belgian Jews made aliyah annually — a 56-percent increase over the annual average of 133 new arrivals from Belgium in 2005-2009, according to Israeli government data.

France too has a jihadist problem that is driving record numbers of Jewish immigrants to Israel, but “It is also a superpower with a strong army and a determined leadership, which Belgium seems not to have,” said Alexander Zanzer, an Antwerp Jew who runs Belgium’s Royal Society of Jewish Welfare. “I don’t have the same confidence that many French Jews have in their authorities following the attacks in their country.”

While in France, “there is leadership capable of making decisions, in Belgium the [bureaucracy] runs itself,” he said. And while this may be the sign of a functioning democracy in times of peace, he said, “in case of emergency, strong leadership is a necessity.”

Zanzer recalled how for 20 months in 2012-2013, a political standoff prevented the formation of a government in Belgium — a binational federal state of 11 million people divided between the richer Flemish, Dutch-speaking, population and the French-speaking south. Like Michaeli, Zanzer said that what most gives him a sense of security are Antwerp Jewry’s own volunteer neighborhood patrols — a service that is far more robust in Antwerp than in Brussels.

Michael Freilich, the editor in chief of the Antwerp-based Joods Actueel monthly, said the violence and the security presence in the Jewish quarter are taking a psychological toll, though he commended the work of special police patrols. After the Brussels attacks, one of Freilich’s three sons had a mild anxiety attack at his Jewish school, which is under constant military protection.

In their spacious home in the heart of the Jewish quarter, Freilich and his wife, Nechama Freilich, said they are unsure of what they should tell the 8-year-old.

“You want to reassure them that things will be alright and we tell them we’re safer here than in Brussels, but you can’t tell them it won’t happen here. It might,” Michael Freilich said.

Can Belgium protect its Jews? A community has its doubts Read More »

New video of Hebron shooting suggests Israelis thought Palestinian had explosive vest

In a newly public video that documents the scene of Thursday’s controversial shooting of a Palestinian terrorist in Hebron, an Israeli can be heard warning that the Palestinian may be wearing an explosive vest.

Army Radio published the video on its website and Twitter feed on Friday. In it, paramedics are seen carrying the soldier wounded by the Palestinian terrorists when someone out of the camera frame, which the army purposely blurred, says, “He apparently has an explosive on him, pay attention! Nobody touches him until bomb disposal arrives.”

Four seconds later, one of the paramedics carrying the soldier — a man who 20 seconds earlier had said, “That terrorist is still alive, the dog. Don’t let him get up!” — cries in a panic, “He’s alive! Somebody do something!”

The video then abruptly ends.

A separate video published Thursday by the Israeli human rights group B’Tselem shows an Israeli soldier shot the supine Palestinian in the head while he lay unattended on the pavement.

The incident in Hebron took place shortly after the Palestinian terrorist and a fellow assailant stabbed an Israeli soldier in the area. The other assailant was immediately killed, while the wounded terrorist was felled. In the B’Tselem video, the wounded Palestinian can be seen lying on the pavement and slightly moving his head, which had blood around it. A minute or so into the video, a soldier shoots the prone Palestinian in the head.

The incident triggered an immediate inquiry by the Israeli military police, and the soldier was arrested and questioned in what is being considered a murder investigation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon were among those who condemned the soldier’s actions. Netanyahu said the incident “doesn’t represent the values of the Israel Defense Forces.”

On Friday, the United Nations’ special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, Nickolay Mladenov, said he strongly condemned the apparent “extrajudicial execution” of the Palestinian.

Under questioning, the soldier said he fired at the terrorist because he feared he would set off an explosive device. He said his unit has been briefed three weeks ago on a Hamas team planning to fire on troops and set off explosives. His lawyer said the video proves he acted in accordance with the rules of engagement for preventing immediate threats.

The Ma’an news agency identified the Palestinian terrorists killed in the incident as Abed al-Fattah Yusri al-Sharif and Ramzi Aziz al-Qasrawi, both 21-year-olds from Hebron.

 

Israel’s education minister, Naftali Bennett, told Army Radio, “Had the terrorist been wearing an explosive vest, the soldier would have been considered a national hero.”

New video of Hebron shooting suggests Israelis thought Palestinian had explosive vest Read More »

Islamic State finance chief, other leaders, likely killed

Islamic State's top finance officer and other senior leaders were likely killed this week in a major offensive targeting the militant group's financial operation, U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter said on Friday.

Carter said the United States believes it killed Haji Iman, a senior Islamic State leader in charge of the group's finances as well as some plots and external affairs.

“We are systematically eliminating ISIL's cabinet,” Carter told reporters at a briefing at the Pentagon, using an acronym to refer to the group.

Earlier media reports said Haji Iman, who also went by Abd ar-Rahman Mustafa al-Qaduli and other aliases, had been killed in a U.S. air strike in Syria, but Pentagon officials gave few details of the operation.

The operations came as U.S. officials said they were helping Iraqis prepare for a major operation in Mosul to take back territory from the militant group, which aims to establish a caliphate in Iraq and Syria.

U.S. Marine General Joseph Dunford, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the Pentagon expects increased capabilities will be provided to Iraqis in preparation for Mosul operations in the coming months.

Islamic State finance chief, other leaders, likely killed Read More »