fbpx

August 22, 2014

Marx Brothers Make Merry in Tv Collection

The Shout! Factory release of “The Marx Brothers TV Collection,” an omnibus of the Brothers Marx’s post-film career TV appearances, is occasion enough to celebrate once more the irrepressible talents of Groucho, Chico and Harpo Marx.

I suppose there may be some readers who have never heard of the Marx Brothers, but I doubt it. In short, at the beginning of the 20th century, hailing from a German-Jewish family, Minnie Marx set her sons on a show-business career hoping to garner some of the success (and steady employment) of her brother, Al Shean, who performed as part of the comedy team Gallagher and Shean. The core of the brothers’ act was Groucho (born Julius), who sang and played guitar; Chico (Leonard), who was an accomplished pianist; and Harpo (Arthur), who couldn’t sing and so played a man who could not speak but could play harp, clarinet, piano and harmonica. Brothers Zeppo (Herbert) and Gummo (Milton) also made appearances as singers. The brothers got their start touring a vaudeville act, based on their personalities and talents, under Groucho’s creative direction, while Chico ran the business side. By the Roaring ’20s, they were stars on Broadway, with their stage comedies “The Cocoanuts” in 1925 and “Animal Crackers” in 1928.

In Hollywood, they started making movies of their Broadway shows as well as original films, including their highest-grossing work, “Horse Feathers” (1932), and their most critically revered film, “Duck Soup” (1933). While under contract with Paramount, their movies were largely extended pieces of vaudeville and improvisational free-for-alls. When their contract with Paramount expired, producer Irving Thalberg lured them to MGM and insisted they have more structured scripts with a beginning, a low point and a happy ending, including romance as prominently in the story line as comedy. Thalberg came up with the innovation of testing some of the brothers’ film comedy bits before live audiences. The result led to the Marx Brothers classics “A Night at the Opera” and “A Day at the Races,” movies Groucho adjudged to be their best. After Thalberg died suddenly during the production of “A Day at the Races,” their remaining MGM films were lesser works. By 1949, after 40 years in show business, the brothers retired.

Then along came television, allowing each of the brothers a new medium to conquer — Groucho, most notably as host of the game show “You Bet Your Life,” and, in Chico’s case, a way to pay for his gambling debts. (When Chico was once asked how much he had lost gambling, he answered: “Just ask Harpo how much he’s earned as an entertainer.”)
The three-DVD set, to be released Aug. 12, features segments, programs, guest appearances, commercials and even home movies. There are nuggets throughout, including Chico imitating Harpo, Harpo imitating Groucho, Groucho late in life donning his greasepaint mustache again to sing of Dr. Quackenbush.

Throughout, Harpo and Chico never seem to age, or rather they come to look like the characters they pretended to be as young men. Groucho ages physically, but his force of personality is so strong that he maintained his quick-witted persona even to his last appearance in 1976, a year before his death, at 86.

Who is there today to compare them to? We can look to “Saturday Night Live” for producing talent quick-witted enough to host shows, be it Jimmy Fallon, Seth Myers or Conan O’Brien. Jon Stewart is clearly descended from Groucho. Perhaps only Steve Martin has combined the brothers’ musicality and humor to find success in almost as many mediums, remaining relevant to successive generations. But really, when you watch the Marx Brothers, there is a special magic no one has yet come to equal.

The Marx Brothers hold a special place in my heart. When I was little, my grandmother first took me to see one of their films, and in high school I discovered them all over again. The Marx Brothers have nursed me when I’ve felt sick, or down, when my energy has flagged. One of the great pleasures of my life was introducing my daughter to their films.The Aero Theatre on Montana Avenue has had a tradition of beginning the New Year with a double feature of Marx Brothers films, and for several years my daughter and I attended, laughing together at the antics of Groucho, Harpo and Chico that never seemed to grow old.

If I try to put my finger on what made me, a child of immigrant Jewish refugees from Europe’s nightmare, so relate to the Marx Brothers, it would be that I saw characters full of pride and self-confidence, fueled by humor, who didn’t assimilate into the establishment so much as triumph over it. That was a life plan.

Groucho was a shyster, a conman, a flimflam artist, a fast-talking insult comic. He was always working an angle, and he said whatever he thought best worked for the situation — which I believed was how many of my relatives and my parents’ friends outwitted the Nazis to survive the Holocaust. Groucho was literate, in love with word play; his speech was littered with foreign words and expressions, sometimes of his own invention — talmudically annotated and punctuated with asides, inside jokes and observations to his audience. This, too, was familiar: When you grow up in a household where nine languages are spoken, none of them grammatically or intelligibly, you get a lot of constant commentary. He was the wise son, a wisenheimer, if you will.

Chico was the wicked son. He was a criminal, crafty if not bright, and the leader of a gang of two (usually joined by Harpo). He was something of a shtarker, an accented foreigner — in this way Chico reminded me of some of the “boys”— actually tough guys — who worked for my father in the Bricha — the underground transport system that helped Jews escape World War II Europe. Although Chico seemed to be of Italian descent — he wore a Tyrolean jacket and hat — that, too, was familiar to me: In fact there are some who claim my mother used to dress me the same way.

As for Harpo: Who doesn’t love Harpo? Harpo is the simple son. He plays the harp like an angel and acts like a mischievous child, even while chasing women (literally). He is all id and no ego. Finally, Gummo and Zeppo were the handsome good-hearted guys who got the girl. That, too, was an ambition of mine.

All of which is to say that the Marx Brothers were people we could imagine gathered around our seder table (or, more likely, at lunch at Los Angeles’ Hillcrest Country Club, where they regularly commandeered a center table, playing cards with George Burns and Milton Berle and letting Rabbi Magnin kibitz or sit in).

“The Marx Brothers TV Collection” contains some rarities and oddities, such as Groucho’s sole dramatic role as a father who disapproves of his daughter’s marriage to a very young Dennis Hopper; and Harpo’s sole dramatic non-Harpo role, as the silent witness to a murder. There are also some wonderful moments when each of the Marx Brothers reprise some of their vaudeville numbers. Groucho, who started out doing a German accent until the first world war made that un-commercial, sings a song about schnitzel and, in what is perhaps my favorite clip, he performs a version of Gallagher and Shean’s theme song, with Jackie Gleason’s brother in the Gallagher role.

What comes through from the home movies and the appearances is how utterly at ease the Marx Brothers were in the world of entertainment — they performed for so long and were so deft at it that they shone in whatever medium on whatever stage or screen you put them on.

There is still so much pleasure in watching the Marx Brothers perform individually or together, so much intelligence in how they deploy their talent, even casually, even in silly commercials, that just the mere glimmer of any of them sets the endorphins rushing, bringing back the totality of pleasure they have offered up, a world in which, as Groucho once put it, “Humor is reason gone mad.”

Marx Brothers Make Merry in Tv Collection Read More »

Vandals target Jewish school in Denmark

A Jewish school in Denmark’s capital city was vandalized this week — its windows broken and anti-Semitic graffiti spray-painted on the building.

Scrawled on the walls of the historic Caroline school in Copenhagen were the words “No peace in Gaza” and “No peace to you Zionist pigs,” AFP is reporting.

Headmaster Jan Hansen told the news agency that some parents kept their children home from school Friday, and that there were some children who “were sad and a bit afraid who we had to send home.”

The incident comes a few weeks after Hansen, citing security concerns,  asked pupils to refrain from wearing religious symbols near school grounds.

Europe has seen a rise of anti-Jewish sentiment and incidents since the start of the latest Israel-Gaza conflict.

Last week, hundreds of demonstrators — many wearing traditional Jewish head coverings and other religious symbols — took to the streets in a heavily Muslim neighborhood of Copenhagen to protest anti-Semitism. Organizers called the demonstration the “yarmulke protest.”

The Caroline school was founded in 1805 and bills itself as the world’s oldest still functioning school.

Vandals target Jewish school in Denmark Read More »

The Son of Hamas vs. The Sword of Islam

One day late in the 15th century, the brilliant Sephardic Bible commentator Don Isaac Abravanel sat in his study in Monopoli, Italy, writing a detailed commentary on the Book of Isaiah. Born in Portugal in 1437, Abravanel eventually moved to Spain in 1481, where in addition to being a respected Jewish scholar and diplomat, he served as treasurer to King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Christian Spain.

Having just experienced the brutal inquisition and subsequent expulsion of his people from Spain in 1492, Abravanel sat in his study and contemplated the meaning and message behind Isaiah's prophecies. He was especially intrigued by Isaiah 54:17 (a verse from this week’s Haftarah portion) that states: “No weapon that is forged against you shall prosper.” Is this “weapon” merely a metaphor for violence, asked Abravanel, or does it point to something more specific? Can it possibly be the weapon of the Babylonians, the Romans, or, perhaps — most logically for Abravanel — the Spanish/Catholic inquisitors from Abravanel's previous home?

Abravanel's answer surprisingly omits all of these famed persecutors of the Jews, and instead points toward “jihad” and “Islamic Fundamentalism.”

Contemplating its meaning, Abravanel comments: “There are religions today whose champions are not content to assert the supremacy of their faith by debate and argument, rather they put to death all who would repudiate their faith. The Ishmaelites (Muslims) fall into this category.”

While Abravanel's comments were his interpretation of what Isaiah’s prophecy meant during the period when he lived, his comments became somewhat of a prophecy on radical Islam's future. Five hundred years after he wrote his comments on Isaiah 54:17, Abravanel's perspective on radical Islam is unfortunately alive and well. A quick survey of Iran, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hizballah and ISIS, to name just a few, make Abravanel’s words seem like a fitting headline or editorial in a contemporary newspaper.

In the face of this ugly wave of radicalism and fundamentalism that is sweeping across the world, there stands one courageous person who is willing to act against it, and speak out against it. His name is Mosab Hassan Yousef, popularly known (by the title of his book) as the “Son of Hamas.” The oldest son and heir apparent to Hamas founding member and leader Sheikh Hassan Yousef, Mosab grew up with the radical Hamas ideology – in school, on the street, and at his dinner table. At the age of 17, he was arrested by Israel for illegal arms smuggling. While sitting in jail, he had a change of heart that would change the course of his life. He went from being a potential Hamas terrorist to an Israeli Shin Bet (Israel’s Secret Service) operative, becoming a double agent on behalf of Israel for ten years. Known by his code name “The Green Prince,” Mosab worked together with his Shin Bet “handler” Gonen Ben Yitzchak, and together they helped prevent dozens of planned suicide bombings and attacks against Israel.

Last night, I was privileged – together with my wife Peni, my daughter Shira and my son Ilan – to attend a private sneak preview screening of “The Green Prince,” the soon-to-be-released documentary that tells the intriguing, incredible and moving story of Mosab Hassan Yousef and Gonen Ben Yitzchak. Watching this film was a powerful experience, but none of us in the audience knew what special surprise awaited us. As the lights went on, the evening’s host announced, “Now, ladies and gentlemen, please give a warm welcome to our film’s two heroes, Mr. Mosab Hassan Yousef and Mr. Gonen Ben Yitzchak.” The surprised audience stood on their feet for a five minute standing ovation, as we greeted two of the most heroic people I have ever met in person. To learn of their story on film, and then see them together on stage, was inspirational, and filled our hearts with hope. Here were two men – one, a “Son of Hamas,” the other, an Israeli Secret Service agent – who shared a stage in camaraderie and friendship, bonded by ten years of intense undercover espionage work in the West Bank and Gaza. Their story seems like the stuff of thriller spy novels and espionage action films – but it’s all true, and I’m sure that they only revealed a tiny fraction of what they actually did. In fact, the film is less about their espionage activities alone, and more about how their espionage affected their lives, their relationship, and their perspective on what was happening in the Middle East.

I encourage you to look out for this film and see it as soon as it released. I also encourage you to read Mosab’s best-selling book “Son of Hamas.” There is much more to this incredible story than what I have written here, so make it a point to see the film and read the book.

When I met Mosab after the screening, I told him that as a spiritual leader whose task is to inspire others, I drew tremendous inspiration from his deep commitment to bring light into the world. I told him that not only was it a privilege to meet him personally, but I was especially grateful that my teenage children were in the presence of a genuine hero who risked his life to fight evil, save lives and try to make the world a better place to live. Talk about a role model. When I met Gonen, I told him he is a true reflection of his name, which means “protector.”

The Son of Hamas’ transformative decision to take on the Sword of Islam reminds us that there are still people who are willing to fight radicalism and stand up for democracy and human rights. In a world that seems so dark and hopeless, Mosab Hassan Yousef and Gonen Ben Yitzchak bring us light and give us hope.

The Son of Hamas vs. The Sword of Islam Read More »

Sen. Boxer forcefully defends Israel, refutes divide amongst Democratic voters

In a Friday press conference at Los Angeles City Hall, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Ca.), when asked about a July poll by Pew Research that showed low support for Israel amongst Democratic voters in its current war with Hamas, said she has not “seen that poll” and that the “American people have supported Israel all the way.”

Boxer, who sits on the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, held the Friday morning gathering as a chance for journalists to ask questions on a range of issues, including the Islamic State’s beheading of American journalist James Foley, Ukraine’s fight with Russian-backed separatists, and the local water drought.

When she was asked by a reporter if she was concerned about the falling support for Israel amongst voters who identify as Democrat, she responded, “I don’t know what poll you’re looking at,” and then blasted Hamas for provoking the war with its murder of three Israeli teenagers in June, subsequent rocket fire, and its extensive cross-border tunnel network.

The survey, released on July 28 by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, documented a stark divide in support for Israel in its current war with Hamas between Democratic and Republican voters. Amongst Democrats, 29 percent blamed Hamas while 26 percent blamed Israel. Amongst Republicans, 13 percent blamed Israel and 60 percent blamed the Gaza militant group, which is recognized by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization.

The war, which has paralyzed much of southern Israel and devastated the densely populated Gaza Strip, has resulted in 67 Israeli deaths according to the Israeli military and a reported 1,881 deaths according to the Hamas-run Palestinian Health Ministry and the United Nations.

Boxer, a vocal supporter of Israel, said, “I defy anyone to name a country [that] can exist if they have rockets being lobbed at them.”

“If we had rockets being lobbed at Los Angeles from Mexico or Washington State from Canada,” Boxer said, “It wouldn’t take us two minutes before we retaliate.”

On Aug. 18, a group of activists from the American Muslims for Palestine and the left-wing Jewish Voice for Peace staged a sit-in at Boxer’s downtown Los Angeles office, protesting her strong support of Israel.

Friday, she acknowledged the protestors’ concerns but added regarding domestic support for Israel, “I don’t think that the American people are confused.”

Sen. Boxer forcefully defends Israel, refutes divide amongst Democratic voters Read More »

Matthew Weiner on ‘Mad Men’ and male friendships

As the creator of “Mad Men,” AMC Networks' period TV drama and its brooding, dysfunctional ad man Don Draper, Matthew Weiner has had some experience in exploring the male psyche.

In his directorial feature film debut “Are You Here,” in theaters on Friday, Weiner wanted to tackle the reality of a male friendship through actors Owen Wilson and Zach Galifianakis, showing two grown men in a state of arrested development.

Weiner, 49, spoke to Reuters in his Los Angeles office, decked out with props from “Mad Men,” about concluding Don's journey, the Emmy awards and his future plans.

Reuters: What did you want to explore about the “bromance” through two childhood friends in “Are You Here”?

Matthew Weiner: They think they're in a stoner comedy together, and then all of a sudden you realize Owen's character has a substance abuse problem and Zach's character is mentally ill. As the reality starts to sink in, it's not like there's no jokes throughout it, but you get stripped away to what I hope is a more poignant and slightly emotional examination of what holds us together.

R: Why choose comedy staples Owen Wilson, Zach Galifianakis and Amy Poehler for this much darker take on life?

MW: You can't teach people to be funny, they either are or they aren't. And these are three deeply funny people to the bone, and the fact that they could use that and change the tone, you feel the poignancy because you feel them losing something.

R: With “Mad Men” wrapping up, are you looking at more movie projects?

MW: I'm not withdrawing from show business, but I am using this period, at least until the show goes off the air, to replenish and find out what's on my mind. I know I'm allowed that, but there's also the thing where you're like, 'Will everybody forget you? Will you be scrambling when you get back to work?' … You don't want to disappear.

R: How do you feel about “Mad Men” nominated for four Emmys next week, including best drama again?

MW: I am thrilled that we are included in this again. The fact that none of the actors on our show (have won), I have all of the chauvinism I can possibly have about the fact that these are, and I think will remain recognized, as some of the great performances of their era and this era in television.

They are nominated, it's not like they're being ignored and the show has been recognized, but every year there's a story about why Jon Hamm was beaten by someone else, or about Elisabeth Moss and why she wasn't nominated. You just don't want the lack of recognition to be a reflection on the quality.

R: Fans are already discussing how Don's journey will end next year. Does that put pressure on you?

MW: I am constantly interested in the audience, I want them to work a little bit because they get pleasure out of putting things together … but when it comes to the ending of the show, the audience has so many voices and it changes over time. I keep my solicitation of opinions to my wife, my incredible writing staff, the people I work with and the actors. They are the audience that I am interested in pleasing, and none of them have ever withheld honesty from me.

R: You showcased New York in “Mad Men,” but you grew up in Los Angeles. Would you explore L.A.'s history in future projects?

MW: I don't even know if I know yet what Los Angeles is necessarily. Los Angeles to me, the best version of it is “Chinatown.” I'm a little bit intimidated by the concept of it, it's hard, it doesn't reveal itself immediately, it has to be looked for, and maybe that's something to think about. Maybe you gave me an idea!

Editing by Eric Kelsey and G Crosse

Matthew Weiner on ‘Mad Men’ and male friendships Read More »

Well-known Turkish Jewish couple found murdered

A prominent Turkish Jewish couple were found murdered in their Istanbul home.

Police discovered the bodies of husband and wife, Jak Karako, 77, and Georgia Karako, 69, inside their apartment on Friday. They had been stabbed multiple times.

The Karakos were the former owners of Ören Bayan, one of Turkey’s most famous textile companies. According to media reports, the police are searching for the couple’s caretaker, whom they suspect of committing the crime.

According to the Daily Sabah newspaper, police entered the apartment after relatives were unable to contact the couple.

Well-known Turkish Jewish couple found murdered Read More »

Recovering Judaism And Living Kosher

By Rabbi Mark Borovitz

WHAT IS FITTING AND PROPER?

This question haunts me each day, each week, each month and each year. It is especially present today as I reviewed the Weekly Torah Portion and read about Kashrut.

Kashrut is usually associated with food and, in my search for recovering Judaism, I know that it means what is Kosher, fitting and proper, in all aspects of living. This is so hard at times when I have forces competing for my time. These include family, work, community, self, etc. To truly live fully, which is the ultimate in living fitting and proper, I have to be engaged in all of the above. Yet, it seems so difficult at times.

What is the Kosher way of relating to Israel? What is the Kosher path of relating to my daughters, my wife, my siblings, my mother? What is the Kosher amount of time and energy I put into my work, my studies, my students, my friends, etc.?

While there are no stock or pat answers to these questions, what I have come to realize is that asking them is paramount to finding the solutions. Engaging in questions and learning allows me to be constantly invigorated and nourished, as well as less frustrated with my limitations and the limitations of others.

Living a Kosher life is what I am always striving for. I don’t always get there, nobody does all the time, and each day that I am engaged in recovering Judaism, I find that I am more and more Kosher.

It is hard to live with questions of what is fitting and proper in each moment and each situation. It is hard to not give in to my/our need to be right, belief that we should control and/or just quit. I have given in to all of these ways and I have uncovered a deep truth. I have to be in the struggle of the question: What is Kosher in this moment/situation in order to have clarity, connection and love for myself and others?

What are your ways of living Kosher? What have you recovered/discovered in living a fitting and proper life?
 

Recovering Judaism And Living Kosher Read More »

Israeli PM deletes controversial ISIS tweet

The Israeli Prime Minister’s office has deleted a controversial tweet that used an image from a graphic beheading video released by ISIS.

After coming under widespread criticism, the prime minister’s took down the hours-old tweet, which included an image of the late journalist James Wright Foley. A campaign on social media has sought to dissuade Twitter users and media outlets from disseminating either the video or images from it out of respect for Foley’s family and to deny a propaganda coup to the jihadist group ISIS, which murdered Foley.

The deleted Israeli tweet, which has been posted on BuzzFeed, juxtaposed an image, labeled “ISIS,” of Foley with his black-clad executioner with blade in hand alongside a picture, labeled “Hamas,” of a body being dragged through a street behind a motorcycle. The tweet was labeled “Hamas is ISIS. ISIS is Hamas,” repeating a statement made on Wednesday by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

A few hours later, the tweet was deleted after the Prime Minster’s office received criticism for using the image, according to the Wall Street Journal. Shortly after midnight on Friday, it was replaced by a similar tweet, supplanting the image of Foley with the ISIS logo in white against a black background.

The prime minister’s office has stood by the sentiment expressed in the tweets. On Friday night, the office released a similar tweet, this time juxtaposing images of ISIS and Hamas performing public executions.

Israeli PM deletes controversial ISIS tweet Read More »

CBS to adapt British sitcom about Jewish family

CBS will adapt a British sitcom called “Friday Night Dinner” about a Jewish family.

The British show, created by Robert Popper, is about the Goodmans, a traditional Jewish family with two sons who come home each week for Friday night dinner.

According to entertainment publication Deadline Hollywood, it is unclear whether the family in the CBS adaptation –which Popper will write — will be Jewish. The show’s development is still in its early stages. Deadline reported that the show will have features similar to those of successful ABC sitcom “Modern Family.”

“Friday Night Dinner” premiered in 2011 and is in its third season. It was previously picked up for American adaptation by NBC for the 2011-2012 season, but the pilot did not become a series.

 

CBS to adapt British sitcom about Jewish family Read More »

David Gregory’s Jewish book plans

David Gregory was just recently sacked as the host of “Meet the Press” in the most public and humiliating fashion possible. And like so many before him, he will seek respite from the suffering of worldly scorn in the consolations of religion.

This is not to say that Gregory will be retreating to a cave in the desert — on the contrary, according to Politico Playbook, Washington’s online political gossip sheet, Gregory is available, through the Leading Authorities speakers bureau, “to speak to associations and companies” about “the political landscape, the White House, Congress, the 2014 elections, and what’s ahead for 2016.” (In other words, what he used to speak about on “Meet the Press” before he was fired.)

Rather, Politico Playbook brings us the news that Gregory is writing a book about “his Jewish faith.”

Gregory’s Jewish faith is an important part of his Beltway persona — he studies Torah with David Brooks, Jeffrey Goldberg and Martin Indyk; he attends DC’s Temple Micah alongside Democratic Leadership Committee founder Al From; and his life as a Jew was even profiled in The Daily Beast, where he confided that his faith helps him “to work with more compassion and empathy” and “gives me a sense of perspective.”

That sense of perspective will be useful as Gregory recovers from a rocky tenure on “Meet the Press,” which was characterized by plunging ratings, brutal reviews and a report that NBC had hired a “psychological consultant” to diagnose what ailed the show. (NBC argued that the consultant was a “brand consultant.”) Of course, one part of that perspective might be that Gregory helmed the show as ratings have faded for Sunday shows generally, and as they have become less culturally relevant amidst the decline of the major networks and the rise of alternative news sources (as well as persistent criticism that the Sunday shows are more hospitable to conservatives and Republicans than liberals and Democrats). Another might be that Gregory was dealt a losing hand by stepping in after the sudden death of Tim Russert, master of the hardball interview.

Gregory’s perspective may also be aided by the reported $4 million severance that NBC is said to be shelling out for canning him before the end of his contract.

His book on Judaism may perhaps draw quibbles from those who will argue that he is not technically Jewish, given that he was born to a Jewish father and a non-Jewish mother. Those same quibblers will also likely argue that his three children are likewise not Jewish, given that Gregory’s wife, Beth Wilkinson, is gentile. (He will probably not encounter any such quibblers at his shul, however, which is Reform.) Given what he has been through for the last six years on “Meet the Press,” any such quibbles would likely be the least of Gregory’s problems.

As for “Meet the Press,” it will not long lack for yiddishkeit, as Gregory’s replacement, Chuck Todd, is also a Reform Jew, the son of a Jewish mother and non-Jewish father . Interestingly, Todd previously succeeded Gregory as NBC’s White House correspondent when Gregory was promoted to the “Meet the Press” gig. Does this mean that in a few short years, Todd will also be penning a book on his Jewish faith?

Stay tuned.

David Gregory’s Jewish book plans Read More »