fbpx

August 19, 2014

Islamic State says another U.S. journalist’s fate depends on Obama

Islamic State militants claimed in a video on Tuesday to be holding U.S. journalist Steven Sotloff and said his life depended on U.S. President Barack Obama's next move.

“The life of this American citizen, Obama, depends on your next decision,” said a masked man in the video posted on social media sites, speaking English with a British accent as he held a prisoner the video named as Steven Sotloff.

The video could not immediately be verified.

Islamic State says another U.S. journalist’s fate depends on Obama Read More »

Six days of quiet in Israel: A brief look back

Now back in Los Angeles, I'm more convinced than ever that my shuttle journalism peacekeeping mission to Israel was a great success. Let it be noted for the record that:

a) The rocket fire ended just before I arrived on Aug. 12 and resumed shortly after I departed on Aug. 19, and

b) It cannot be proven that my stories evoking sympathy for Israelis in the western Negev were not the prime reason for the lack of fighting while I was there. Maybe, just maybe, my emotion-wrought journalism reached the depths of the hearts of the fighters in the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas's “military wing.” 

As part of my peacekeeping trip, I spent the night of Aug. 13 at Kibbutz Nir Am, which is next to Sderot and about 3,000 feet from the Gaza border. Some friends of mine from Los Angeles invited me. They were on a solidarity mission with their rabbi, Avraham Zajac, who runs the Chabad SOLA synagogue in Los Angeles. That evening, we kibbutzed it up, grilling some chicken, enjoying pickles and hummus, and sipping on some nice cease-fire scotch, courtesy of Johnny Walker. That night, in fact, was the one point where I feared my peacekeeping efforts may fail. As a 72-hour cease fire came to an end, Hamas launched a few Qassam rockets into Israel. The trail of those rockets was visible in the horizon as we drove into the kibbutz. As we sat around the picnic table that night, we could also hear the distant booms of Israeli airstrikes. It was not to last, though, for too long, as a five-day cease fire agreement was quickly reached.

Earlier that day, my two buddies, their two buddies and Rabbi Zajac greeted Israeli troops who were stationed at their desert staging areas outside Gaza, spent time with an Ethopian-born Israeli woman whose husband was killed in Gaza three weeks ago, visited injured troops in hospitals and spent around $5,000 at stores in southern Israel to help with the local economy's dramatic loss of business. Here are the stories I wrote from Israel and below are some photos from the brief journey:

Aug. 12: ” target=”_blank”>Fired by Netanyahu, rival aims to give voice to Likud's hawks

Aug. 15: ” target=”_blank”>For Israelis in western Negev, each day is 'Russian Roulette'

PHOTOS: Aug. 12

Hours away from landing in Israel, two young American Jews making aliyah look downright excited

Israeli President Reuven Rivlin and Jewish Agency chairman Natan Sharansky greet hundreds of new immigrants

Aug. 14

Left to right: Yuval Zimmerman, Eric Zimmerman, Rabbi Abraham Zajac, Eran Weiss, Omri Cohen and Basi Zajac (front)

Parents in Sderot relax as their children safely play inside a JNF-built indoor recreation center

Even in the middle of a cease-fire, store owners in Sderot closed early due to a lack of business

Six days of quiet in Israel: A brief look back Read More »

Hamas threatens to aim further attacks at Israel’s airport

The armed wing of the Hamas Islamist militant group that dominates Gaza threatened on Wednesday to aim more rocket fire at Israel's Ben-Gurion Airport near Tel Aviv and cautioned international airlines to avoid it.

Citing Israel's air strikes in Gaza that have killed three people after rockets were fired at Israel in breach of a truce, a Hamas commander said in a statement the group “has decided to respond to the Israeli aggression,” by making the airport a “target of attack” for the day.

Hamas said earlier it had fired a rocket at the airport, at a time when dozens of rockets were shot at southern Israel and the Tel Aviv area. There were no reported casualties in those strikes.

Reporting by Nidal al-Mughrabi; Editing by Chris Reese

Hamas threatens to aim further attacks at Israel’s airport Read More »

Missiles over Jerusalem experienced by Rabbi Abraham Cooper

24 hours ago, almost everyone in Cairo, Jerusalem and Ramallah thought they had a deal for a long-time truce in Gaza. Just before midnight on Aug. 20, Rabbi Abraham Cooper, the Wiesenthal Center’s associate dean, experienced up close and personal what a promise from Hamas means. He, along with his wife and Ehud Yaari – Israel TV’s leading expert on Arab affairs – had just pulled up to an apartment house in Jerusalem where the Coopers are staying. Suddenly the alarm rang out across the city. Rabbi Cooper joined the others in jumping out of the car and hugged a low wall for about four minutes. Just as the sirens went silent a massive boom could be heard, the Iron Dome intercepted a rocket headed towards a neighborhood somewhere in Jerusalem or adjacent Beit Shemesh.

“Nine years Israelis have had to put up with this? No country can survive when an entire section of its population center has its daily routines upended. While they don’t want to do it, it appears only IDF action, not empty words of a terror group, can definitively knockout Hamas’ military/terror capabilities. Then maybe the people of Gaza can rebuild their civilian infrastructure under complete transparency and outside control and Israelis in the south can get back their lives.

This is very personal as my niece is in the Beit Shemesh area with her three day old infant girl and my daughter – just a few blocks from here is in her ninth month – expecting her sixth child.”

– Rabbi Abraham Cooper

Rabbi Abraham Cooper is the associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

Missiles over Jerusalem experienced by Rabbi Abraham Cooper Read More »

Palestinians call report of thwarted Hamas plot ‘doubtful’

This story originally appeared on themedialine.org.

Palestinian officials reacting to Israeli media reports of a thwarted Hamas plot to ignite a third Intifada (Palestinian uprising) as cover for a take-over of the West Bank and the overthrow of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas say they are “doubtful” that the story is accurate.

The Israeli account says the Shin Bet domestic security agency made almost 100 arrests during the past several months, 93 of whom were Hamas operatives creating more than 40 of what they termed “terror cells” in towns and villages throughout the West Bank. The plot included the staging of mass attacks on Jewish targets including Jerusalem’s Temple Mount, Haram Al-Sharif to Muslims, in order to trigger an Intifada (like the period between 2000 and 2005 typified by bus bombings and unbridled violence) during which Hamas would oust the Fatah-aligned Palestinian Authority (PA) and its president.

Brigadier General Adnan Damiri, spokesman for the Palestinian security services, told The Media Line that, “There are no other sources to back up these claims and we are doubtful.”  He asked, “If these arrests were made back in May, why are we hearing about it only now?” 

Despite their skepticism, PA officials say they are taking the matter “very seriously.”

“The President is following up very closely on this and has asked the relevant security departments within the PA to check the accuracy of the details in the Shabak (Shin Bet) report,” he said.

A Palestinian official close to President Abbas speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly confirmed to The Media Line that “For sure the President is taking this seriously. Leadership agreed last night that ‘it needs more investigation,’ including a fact check on the numbers” quoted in the story.

The Shin Bet claims it confiscated at least $600,000 in cash from the Hamas members who were alleged to be planning operations against Israel.  The agency also claims it seized 24 weapons, among them M-16 automatic rifles, handguns, rocket launchers and large amount of ammunition.  

“We are checking on the names (mentioned in the report) and the facts,” Damiri said, adding that “all appropriate personnel” from the PA had been called up to work on these accusations. He said he had not been informed whether anyone from the Palestinian security echelon had contacted their Israeli counterparts to coordinate investigations; and Damiri did not say whether the Israelis had shared their findings with PA officials prior to releasing details to the media. Damiri did say that “It’s clear the Palestinian-Israeli security cooperation is going downwards.”

Spokesmen for the Israeli government and Israel Defense Forces respectively declined to comment for this article.

Wasef Uraiqat, a Palestinian military analyst and retired major general told The Media Line that the incident underscores the lack of security coordination and casts the Palestinian security apparatus in a negative light. Echoing Damiri, Uraiqat remarked that “Israel says there is security coordination. If this is the case, why didn’t they tell Abbas or the PA security back in May?”

He charged that the report weakens the PA security infrastructure because it begs the question how the security forces missed something like this. “The PA does not have an army and the security forces are working under occupation,” defends Uraiqat.  He goes on to suggest that Israel has a hidden agenda, “to divert attention away from Gaza, a place where Israel does not want to have its troops on the ground.” He argued that, “The Israeli army lost the deterrent force in Gaza and they want to regain it in the West Bank,” he said, adding that this, “changes the rules of the game.”

Uraiqat predicts that the Israeli army will operate in West Bank cities as it did in Hebron in June when it arrested hundreds of men following the kidnapping of three Israeli teens and the subsequent revenge killing of Palestinian teenager Mohammad Abu Khdeir by a Jewish gang.

At the time, the Palestinian leadership came under heavy criticism from citizens calling for an end to the PA — Israeli security cooperation because they viewed it as collaboration.  Abbas-loyal security agencies were helping Israel look for the three missing teenagers who ultimately turned up dead. Although never proven, Israel still insists that Hamas was behind the kidnap/murders.

Uraiqat also says this is not an easy matter for Abbas because the release of this report could be seen “as an attempt to divide the Palestinian negotiators representing various factions in Cairo. This can be a new scene. In Israel’s 2002 invasion of the West Bank, it was Israel versus Palestine. What Israel is trying to do is create is ‘Palestine versus Palestine.’”

In response, President Abbas told the official Palestinian news agency WAFA that the report poses a serious threat to the future of the Palestinian unity government.  Damiri agrees. “This report is a hit on the national unity government, namely the unity which exists between Fatah, Hamas and all Palestinian factions,” he said.

The report was released as negotiators are presumed to be in the final stages of negotiations for a long-term ceasefire between Israel and Hamas following a month of fierce fighting that left some 2,000 Palestinians dead and 10,000 wounded some of them critically.

Damiri says he thinks that this report is a way to influence the President to pressure Palestinian negotiators in Cairo to make concessions.    “This report could be an attempt to throw a spoke in the wheels of the indirect talks between Israelis and Palestinians,” he said, adding that this is “negative” for the attempts to secure a truce.

“Israel is looking for excuses to engage in a battle with us. They started in the West Bank, in cities like Hebron and Ramallah, then they waged war on Gaza and have now returned to the West Bank,” Damiri said.

Palestinians call report of thwarted Hamas plot ‘doubtful’ Read More »

the kids who write

Sunday I had the good fortune of watching my eldest daughter participate in WRITOPIA LAB’s summer culmination at Barnes and Noble in Santa Monica. She stood at a lectern reading the first chapter of her novel as though this was her Sunday norm.

I sat there with pride of course, but mostly in serious gratitude for this Steve Lewis and his amazing cast of published authors who spent their afternoons helping kids like mine share their thoughts.

And their thoughts were profound. There were the sweet younger students who wrote about platypus worlds and candy communities, and a couple of gentle poets brewing, but the bulk of the students hovered in their early teen years and seemed to have a similar set of questions on their minds:

What is this thing called life all about? How do we give it meaning? And How do we find our way when we feel as alone as we do sometimes?

The themes were presented in some very viable movie versions too- a “hunger games meets divergent” sorta thing was definitely offered at times, as was some stellar lines, none of them my old brain can recall at the moment of course.

In the aftermath of Robin Williams’ death, I can only offer a reiteration of what I have been hearing- that we need to lift the veil on sadness, make it okay to talk about feelings such as loneliness or the deep pain that is isolation. I kept hearing these beautiful children who were giving voice to some painful, albeit fictional, situations, BUT getting such positive feedback, and I couldn’t help but wonder if this couldn’t help even just a bit?

Now, I have been around the block enough to know that its not just the quick fix that a little applause can bring to fill the inner well. In fact, it is sometimes the addiction to the external validations that bring a person to their knees in depression. But maybe if we can offer our young people the ability to feel good about their shadow sides more, about their unanswered questions, then maybe… ?

Maybe we too could learn to stop ourselves when we need to, and take a moment or two, or three or more, to applaud our shadows, and our bruised questions. And take heart to find connection with others.

Practice, practice, and all will come…. In our bodies and our minds.

Michelle

PLS NOTE OUR NEW ISH FALL SCHEDULE!

MONDAYS     9-10 am

TUESDAY      NO CLASS

WEDNESDAY  10:30-11:30 am

THURSDAY     8:30-9:30 AM           6:00 pm-7:00 pm

the kids who write Read More »

Egypt urges U.S. restraint over Missouri unrest

Egypt on Tuesday urged U.S. authorities to exercise restraint in dealing with racially charged demonstrations in Ferguson, Missouri – echoing language Washington used to caution Egypt as it cracked down on Islamist protesters last year.

U.S. foes Iran and Syria also lambasted the United States, but while they are frequent critics of Washington, it is unusual for Egypt to criticize such a major donor. It was not immediately clear why Egypt would issue such a statement.

Ties between Washington and Cairo were strained after Egyptian security forces killed hundreds of Muslim Brotherhood supporters following the army's ousting of freely elected President Mohamed Mursi in July 2013.

The Egyptian Foreign Ministry's statement on the unrest in Ferguson read similarly to one issued by U.S. President Barack Obama's administration in July 2013, when the White House “urged security forces to exercise maximum restraint and caution” in dealing with demonstrations by Mursi supporters.

The ministry added it was “closely following the escalation of protests” in Ferguson, unleashed by the fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager by a white policeman on Aug. 9.

Human Rights Watch said in a report last week Egyptian security forces systematically used excessive force against Islamist protesters after Mursi was ousted. Egypt said the report was “characterized by negativity and bias”.

In a second day of Twitter messages about the disturbances in Ferguson, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei criticized the United States as “egotistical and unreliable”.

He also sought to link the unrest to Washington's support of Israel, sworn foe of Tehran.

“Brutal treatment of black people isn’t indeed the only anti-human rights act by U.S. govt; look at US’s green light to #Israel’s crimes,” he wrote on Monday, adding Washington was the world's “biggest violator” of human rights.

Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister for European and American Affairs Takht Ravanchi on Monday accused Washington of “racist behavior and oppression”, the Fars News Agency said.

In Syria, another U.S. adversary, a bulletin from state news agency SANA accused police in Ferguson of “racist and oppressive practices”.

Pro-government media in Turkey, where the authorities came under U.S. criticism for a heavy-handed clampdown on weeks of protests around Istanbul's Gezi Park last year, also took a swipe.

“You were sounding off when Gezi was happening … You crook with double standards,” wrote Ahmet Sagirli, a columnist in the Turkiye newspaper.

Reporting by Maggie Fick in Cairo, Oliver Holmes in Beirut, Michelle Moghtader in Dubai, Selin Bucak in Istanbul; Editing by Alison Williams

Egypt urges U.S. restraint over Missouri unrest Read More »

Anti-Israel protesters target synagogue in Geneva

Anti-Israel protesters demonstrated outside Geneva’s main synagogue.

A Swiss watchdog group said the weekend protests in front of the Beth Yaakov, or Grande, Synagogue were the first public displays of hostility in Switzerland toward Israel since the conflict with Gaza began in early July.

A veiled woman carried a sign reading “Every synagogue is an Israeli embassy” and waved a Palestinian flag on Saturday morning, according to the Intercommunity Coordination Against Anti-Semitism and Defamation watchdog organization, or CICAD. The same protester returned that night accompanied by three men, the group said.

A second woman wearing a Palestinian flag around her neck tried unsuccessfully to enter the synagogue, according to the watchdog. The protesters told police that they have a right to protest and threatened to return the following Saturday.

“With this first public demonstration of hostility towards the Jewish community in Geneva since the beginning of the conflict in Gaza, an unacceptable step was taken,” CICAD said. “Synagogues should not become the new places of expression of hatred against Israel.”

CICAD called on local politicians, including those who support the Palestinian cause, to denounce this kind of action against the Jewish community and for authorities to take action to protect the Jewish community.

Anti-Israel protesters target synagogue in Geneva Read More »

5 comments on the Mahmoud-Morel wedding and Israel’s intermarriage problems

Israel is suddenly in intermarriage frenzy. The reason? No more than anecdotal: a Jewish woman decided to marry an Arab (Muslim) man. They had their wedding earlier this week. A big event for them, a non-event for the public. That is, except for the fact that a radical right-wing group, named Lehava, insisted on arranging a demonstration close by. A controversy-seeking media, possibly bored by now with Gaza and in need of fresh material, turned this fringe demonstration into a national spectacle. The ugly scenes of bearded Jewish men shouting “Muhammad is dead”, coupled with the haste of politicians that saw an opportunity to score some points, occupied Israel for 24 hours. Pundits were asked to analyze. Rabbis were summoned to talk shows. Leaders were urged to “respond”. Assimilation, for a short moment, replaced “the tunnels” as the big threat to Israel's survival.

Here are 5 comments on this controversy (which isn't expected to last for very long):

1.

Israeli Jews are under no serious threat of assimilation for a simple reason: they have no one to marry but their own breed. In most cases and to most Jews, Israeli Arabs are no option. The differences in culture, and even more so the tension between the two populations make such marriages quite rare. And besides, when Jews are the majority, I'd expect the Arab minority to worry about assimilation – not the Jews. Other types of Jewish-non-Jewish marriages exist: Jews marry immigrants from the former Soviet Union that aren't recognized as Jews by the rabbinate. Those who judge such unions by Orthodox halachic criteria have a problem with them. But when you look at them in a more relaxed way – say, by thinking about the culture of these newly created homes – it is hard to see them as real “assimilation”. These homes, if they feel welcome by most Israelis, will be Jewish homes.

2.

That Israel doesn't have a real problem with intermarriage doesn't mean it doesn't have a problem with its attitude towards intermarriage. The attitude problem comes in two main formats:

One – Lack of interest in formulating a reasonable approach to why it is important to have Jewish marriages. That is, Israelis are not bothered by this problem and hence don't think about it and hence tend to have only weak resistance to it. As I demonstrated not long ago based on numbers, quite a few Israelis “would gladly intermarry” had they had the opportunity.

Two – A sense of hysteria. While many Israelis are tranquil about the possibility of intermarriage, many others are overexcited about it without reason. This was demonstrated during the short-lived recent wedding controversy when words such as “holocaust” “disaster” “calamity” and the likes were frequently used. Take a look at this example: “'Intermarriage in Israel is simply a catastrophe,' venerated Zionist rabbi, Rabbi Chaim Druckman”. Except it is not. Not even close.

3.

I must say that the responses from many Israeli political leaders to the wedding controversy were surprisingly measured and reasonable. They tended to A. denounce the ugly demonstration, B. unapologetically declare their opposition to intermarriage.

Take a look at the response of Yair Lapid – the leader of secular Yesh Atid, and a man considered by haredi Israelis as staunch enemy: “If my son would come to me tomorrow and say ‘Dad, I want you to meet not Rina but Rona and she’s [Christian] Orthodox, or Catholic and I’m marrying her and the children won’t be Jewish,’ would this bother me? It would really bother me”.  

I heard the interview with Lapid on the radio. Following it, there was another interview with former Labor leader, MK Shelly Yachimovitz. Her response to Lapid's comments: I agree with every word. The views of these two secular leaders didn't seem far from the view expressed by Orthodox-Zionist leader Naftali Bennet.

4.

Truth must be told: It is harder for many Israelis to swallow the bitter pill of intermarriage between a Jew and a Muslim Arab than it is to accept intermarriage with a Christian Norwegian Kibitz volunteer. So yes, there is a kernel of racism to some of the responses to the recent wedding. It is not really surprising – people usually tend to be less favorable to unions with people whom they suspect. But that's no excuse. The issue of the tense relations between Israeli Jews and Arabs needs to be addressed as urgently and as vigorously as possible (but don't expect it to be solved anytime soon).

5.

Try to remember that Israel is a curious little country. We tend to be very conservative on some things – or to have such an image (an image which this wedding controversy might strengthen). But we are also one of the most liberal countries on earth on other matters. Consider this: just last week, with very little fanfare, Israel extended it “law of return” privileges to gay couples. So when you are told that Israel is becoming a “theocracy” or is “ruled by the rabbis” or other such nonsense, don't think about a small group making big noise about one couple – think about official Israel changing its policy in a way that will have an actual impact on new immigrants.

5 comments on the Mahmoud-Morel wedding and Israel’s intermarriage problems Read More »

My Role Model’s Gone

If you are reading this blog, it is because of Leonard Fein. 

Leonard, known to everyone as Leibel, died this past week at the age of eighty. He was a writer, sociologist, educator, founder (with Elie Wiesel) and editor of Moment magazine, a social activist who founded MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger and who gave his later years to a fevered fight for American literacy, a pundit – and one might say, the consummate Jewish public intellectual. He made me want to be a Jewish writer  – someone who would put the written word (not to mention the spoken word) at the very center of my rabbinical calling, and at the very seat of my soul.

Leibel was not the first editor to publish my work. That was Professor Eugene Borowitz, who recently turned ninety. He published my remonstrations about how the Left had turned against Israel in the wake of the Yom Kippur War. That was in Sh'ma, and it was (gulp) 1974, when I was a young college student. (Good news and bad news. The good news: I recently re-read that piece, and it is still relevant. The bad news: I recently re-read that piece, and it is still relevant).

But it was Leibel who published my first full-length essays in Moment magazine. Back in the 1970s and 1980s, I cherished, loved, devoured, and waited around the mailbox for each issue of Moment. Each issue was a masterpiece, featuring work from the best and the brightest Jews in the world. Leibel had named Moment magazine after a now-tragically defunct Jewish journal that had existed, pre-Shoah, in Warsaw.

I wrote about the film “Chariots of Fire” (along with my dear friend, Robert Levine, who died far too young), and then, some years later, “Shylock in Drag?”, a realization-in-print that JAP jokes were simply a form of kosher misogyny and thinly veiled anti-Semitism to boot; if the only American princesses that we laugh at are Jewish, we got a problem. Leibel published my work, and in so doing, he encouraged me to write more and to further develop my voice. 

I became a Fein-phile. I would hear him speak wherever and whenever I could. I would welcome him to lecture at my congregation. We would see each other at conferences and have long conversations about the important issues of the day. Last time I saw him was two years ago at his home in Boston. He was already somewhat ailing, but he was perfectly capable of telling me, in no uncertain terms, that my evaluation of a recent work by Walt and Mearsheimer was ill-founded. He thought that they had a good point. I didn’t.  Oh, well. When you were with Leibel, you didn’t mind being “wrong.” The conversations were always so much fun that it didn’t matter.

Leibel was a vanishing breed of Jewish liberal. I loved his liberalism because I shared most of it, and because it was of an older, perhaps more venerable variety – the Old Left. He loved to tell the story of his father, who was a great Jewish educator, who went to Philadelphia just to go to Independence Hall, and just to see the Liberty Bell – and to be more precise, just to see the crack in the Liberty Bell. He taught his son that his job was to try to mend that crack – which was precisely what he went on to do.

But the Jewish stuff — that was why I loved him. Leibel Fein was the first person to puncture a hole in the whole Jewish survival bit, and to ask the crucial question (which I once turned into a “party game” at a synagogue board meeting): Complete the following sentence – “The Jewish people should survive so that _____________.”

Leibel cut away all of the verbal and ideological “fat” that surrounded the possible answers. None of those answers, or at least the most common and typical answers, were good enough – certainly not each one in and of itself. To remember the Shoah? The state of Israel? Jewish culture? Pure nostalgia?

No. Leibel taught that those answers, or those answers alone, were not enough. No, you could not build a religion around merely remembering the Shoah; it was too morbid. No, you could not build a religion around merely the State of Israel; it let other Jews do your Jewish stuff for you. (Note: Leibel was not terribly interested in vicarious Judaism. Neither dead Jews nor Jews on the other side of the world could carry the burden of Jewish identity).

Leibel resolutely believed that it was not Jewish interests that needed protecting; it was Jewish values. And what were those values? The marriage of universalism and particularism; a commitment to Jewish literacy, competence and meaning; asking questions that pointed to the beginning of a spiritual search; and the (now ubiquitous) notion of tikkun olam. Read his vastly underappreciated Where Are We? The Inner Life of American Jews and marvel at how damn well he put it all together. When it came to knocking nouns against verbs and getting them to sing, there was no one like Leibel. To be in his presence and to learn from him: who else but Leibel could pull out an old tape of the original version of “If I Were A Rich Man” and show that it had contained a reference to giving tzedakah — and then bemoan the teetering fate of that Jewish value? 

And, lest you walk away with the impression that Leibel was a tough, intellectually and morally demanding Jewish curmudgeon (which he could be), you needed to see his soft, vulnerable side. Which is precisely what we all saw when he losthis beloved daughter, Nomi, and put his sorrow into a memoir –Against the Dying of the Light: A Father’s Journey Through Loss. “>http://bjpa.org/Publications/results.cfm?Authored=Leonard-Fein&AuthorID=412 You might not agree with everything that he said, but he said it so well. 

Paul Simon once sang: “Who'll be my role model, now that my role model's gone?”

That's how I feel right now. We needed Leibel Fein, and we still do. 

The only question is: In a world where Jewish public intellectuals are in short supply, who will take his place?

My Role Model’s Gone Read More »