fbpx

August 18, 2014

Stop pretending nothing happens in August

The headlines these days all seem to demand exclamation marks. Iraq is teetering on the brink! Russian troops are massing on the Ukranian border! Gaza lies in ruins! World’s worst Ebola epidemic afflicts Africa!  

Oh, and it is also National Goat Cheese Month.  Welcome to another quiet and peaceful August.

Yeah, right. One of the puzzles of summer is why so many of us persist in pretending that August is a month when nothing happens, when we can step back, tune out, take a break, and recharge. Europeans even think they are entitled to take the entire month off.

Perhaps there’s something about late summer, a couple months gone since school let out in June, that makes us forget our history. This year, August is full of reminders. We’re commemorating the 40th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s resignation and the 100th anniversary of the outbreak of World War I.

Bellicose August also brought the Gulf of Tonkin incident that triggered our involvement in Vietnam, Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1990, the failed coup attempt against Mikhail Gorbachev in 1991, the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact in 1939 that enabled Hitler to invade Poland on September 1, and the atomic bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima in 1945 and ensuing Japanese surrender. Hurricane Katrina also occurred in August, but let’s leave Mother Nature out of it.

There’s a melancholic quality to August, a month nearly synonymous with “waning days of summer.”  Less acknowledged in our cultural vernacular is the extent to which the “waning” feeling is as much about the end of another year as it is about the end of summer.  

Sure, we sing “Auld Lang Syne,” kiss under the mistletoe, and wish each other a “Happy New Year” when December turns to January. But who among us doesn’t feel that the real reset moment each year, the new beginning, comes in September, the day after Labor Day? The fall is when we start school and football season and the U.S. government fiscal year, and when we get serious, if we ever do, about our work.

August, then, is about the waning not only of summer, but also of each passing year, and lost possibilities. It is about the waning of life, even.  There is a grasping, desperate quality to many of the historical events that took place in August—hence the resonance of the title of Barbara Tuchman’s historical bestseller about the outset of World War I, The Guns of August.  It’s quite fashionable to study the sequence of events that led to the so-called “Great War,” which in retrospect appear like dominoes falling as if on a predetermined course.  The rest of the war is far less fashionable to read about, as it proves too muddled a narrative.  Best to focus on the August beginning, and how it ended all that came before.

Mischief conspires with melancholia in August, the notion that mice can play while the cat’s vacationing.  It’s not clear whether Saddam Hussein thought he would get away with taking over Kuwait if he did so while the American president was summering in Maine, or whether that president’s son, when he was in office a decade later, would have taken warnings of an airborne Al Qaeda plot more seriously had he been briefed about them at some time and place other than August at his Texas ranch. 

August and the waning days of summer (and of the year, I insist) is when we let our guards down, creating an opening for those with an agenda, be it the invasion of Poland or Kuwait, or the shorting of the pound (George Soros famously bet against the British currency in August 1992, and won big).  So keep your eye on colleagues who seem especially busy and eager to stick around the office this month. Who knows what they’re up to?

Financial markets are notoriously slow in August, the month of lowest trading volumes, when bankers follow their clients to the beach. But “slow” can be a deceptive term in business as in life, given that lower volume and less liquidity in a market can make it more volatile, and more susceptible to speculation.  If you buy or sell 1,000 shares of a company, you are far more likely to influence that stock price on a day when only 5,000 shares trade hands than on a day when 100,000 shares trade hands. 

That same dynamic applies to anyone seeking to influence the outcome of any event: your influence increases the fewer people are engaged.  Which is what makes this such a dodgy month, and the current news headlines so ominous.

And now, I’m off to the beach for a week.  It’s August, after all.

Andres Martinez is editorial director of Zocalo Public Square, for which he writes the Trade Winds column.

Stop pretending nothing happens in August Read More »

Autopsy shows Ferguson police shot Michael Brown 6 times

An unarmed black teenager whose killing by a white police officer has set off a week of protests and rioting in Ferguson, Missouri, was struck by at least six bullets, a lawyer for the deceased's family said on Monday.

The path of one bullet indicates 18-year-old Michael Brown may have been lowering his head in surrender when the fatal shot hit, said Daryl Parks, the family's lawyer.

Many details surrounding the shooting remain unclear, and federal and local officials have yet to release their own autopsy report.

Parks said the autopsy results clearly showed that the police officer who killed Brown should be arrested. He presented the results at a press conference showing that one bullet hit Brown in the “very top of his head” and another that struck his head exited near his eye.

“His head was in a downward position,” Parks said. “Given those kind of facts, this officer should have been arrested.”

The Brown family and protesters from around the United States have called for the officer's arrest for days. But police have said only that 28-year-old Officer Darren Wilson was put on paid administrative leave after the Aug. 9 shooting.

St. Louis County Police spokesman Brian Schellman did not respond to a query about why the officer had not been arrested. The department is running a parallel investigation to one by the U.S. Department of Justice, which is evaluating the shooting for civil rights violations.

The lack of an arrest, and the Ferguson police department's reluctance to release details of the shooting have brought thousands of protesters to the streets of the St. Louis suburb of Ferguson, whose population of about 21,000 is largely black.

Some rioting and looting has accompanied the protests. Missouri Governor Jay Nixon deployed National Guard troops to Ferguson on Monday to try to restore calm.

On Saturday Nixon declared a state of emergency there and set a curfew calling for the streets to be cleared from midnight until 5 a.m. (0500 to 1000 GMT).

Schools in the area were ordered closed on Monday because of the chaos in and around the town.

President Barack Obama is scheduled to meet with Attorney General Eric Holder on Monday afternoon to discuss the Ferguson situation, his office said.

The Brown family has called for peaceful demonstrations and an end to violence, and the police forces on the ground have been widely criticized for using excessive force on protesters.

Brown's mother, Lesley McSpadden, spoke out Monday in a televised interview with ABC's “Good Morning America” program. She said peace could be restored “with justice… arresting this man and making him accountable for his action.”

UNANSWERED QUESTIONS

The private autopsy provides some answers, but not all, the family's lawyers said. They said Brown's body did not show any signs that he had struggled with the officer and that there was no gunshot residue on the body, indicating Brown was probably at least a few feet away from the gun when he was shot.

The lawyers said they did not yet have access to clothing that might show gunshot residue, X-rays taken when the county did the first autopsy on Brown's body, or toxicology results, which the county has thus far not released.

Police have given few details of the police officer's version of events. The officer remains in hiding, and police say he has been threatened.

What police have said so far is that Brown and a friend were walking down the middle of a road that runs between a handful of apartment buildings shortly after noon when Wilson asked the two to move off the narrow road and onto a sidewalk. Police said Wilson reported that Brown reached into his patrol car and struggled for his service gun when Wilson fired the initial shot.

Brown's friend Dorian Johnson, 22, said Wilson had reached out through his car window to grab at Brown and that the teenager was trying to get away when he was shot. Brown held up his hands in a sign of surrender, but Wilson got out of his patrol car and shot him several more times, they said.

Another witness, Piaget Crenshaw, told CNN that she also had seen the officer acting as though he was trying to pull Brown into the car through the window. Brown broke free and started running, she said.

“He got away,” Crenshaw said. “It just seemed to have upset the officer. He got out and just started chasing the boy.”

Brown at one point turned around to face the officer, and “when he turned toward the cop is when he… let off the most shots,” she said.

Crenshaw's cellphone and video of the aftermath of the shooting were taken by police as evidence, she told Reuters.

An online petition is calling for the firing of Ferguson Police Chief Tom Jackson, who refused to identify Wilson as the officer involved until five days after the incident.

Jackson also raised the ire of the Brown family and its supporters for releasing police reports showing that the teen was a suspect in the theft of cigars from a neighborhood convenience mart. The family called this a “smear” campaign.

Jackson later said the officer did not know Brown was a robbery suspect when he shot Brown and that the incident was tied only to Wilson's request that he move out of the street.

Additional reporting by Carey Gillam in Kansas City, Eric Beech in Washington; Writing by Carey Gillam; Editing by Mark Heinrich and Lisa Von Ahn

Autopsy shows Ferguson police shot Michael Brown 6 times Read More »

WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING IN THE MIDDLE EAST Part IV: The Mentality of Extreme Islamic Terror

This very short read is from a MD at Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem, Israel. His name is Dr. Arieh Eldad. Dr. Eldad is now a member of the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset. We chose to quote his story because despite being so shocking it is so typical and indicative of the mentality of the terrorists who wage a total uncompromising war against Israel. Here's the story:

“It is really hard for western society to understand the thinking of extreme Muslims. It is counter to civilized understanding.

I was instrumental in establishing the Israeli National Skin Bank, which is the largest in the world. The National Skin Bank stores skin for every day needs as well as for war time or mass casualty situations. The skin bank is hosted at the Hadassah Ein Kerem University hospital in Jerusalem where I was the Chairman of plastic surgery. This is how I was asked to supply skin for an (Muslim) Arab woman from Gaza, who was hospitalized in Soroka Hospital in the town Beersheba, Israel, after her family burned her. Usually, such atrocities happen among (Muslim) Arab families when the women are suspected of having an affair.

We supplied all the needed Homograft for her treatment. She was successfully treated by my friend and colleague, Prof. Lior Rosenberg and discharged to return to Gaza. She was invited for regular follow-up visits to the outpatient clinic in Beersheba.

One day she was caught at a border crossing wearing a suicide belt. Her mission was to explode herself in the outpatient clinic of the hospital where they saved her life. It seems that her family promised her that if she did that, they would forgive her. This is only one example of the war between Jews and Muslims in the Land of Israel. It is not a territorial conflict. This is a civilizational conflict, or rather a war between civilization and barbarism. Bibi (Netanyahu) [Prime-Minister of Israel] gets it, Obama does not.”

So much for Dr. Eldad's story. You be the judge.

WHAT IS REALLY HAPPENING IN THE MIDDLE EAST Part IV: The Mentality of Extreme Islamic Terror Read More »

What grade would you give the United Nations?

The Tower of Babel was destroyed forever and any similar body acting as a global centralized authority will inevitably burn to ashes as well. However, ignoring the necessary collective efforts of our evolving complex global world is not an option.

The world is immersed in conflict right now (Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Libya, South Sudan, Ukraine, Gaza, etc.). One would suspect that the globally appointed leader (the United Nations) would be able to make some progress addressing this intractable crises as they continue to spread, become more entrenched, and overlap in more complicated ways.

Perhaps the blame should not all be directed to the UN body itself. Many blame the fact that the fifteen members of the UN Security Council includes permanent member nations committing gross human rights violators like China and Russia. Similarly, others point to uncooperative member states: Richard Holbrooke, a former US ambassador at the UN, explained “Blaming the United Nations when things go wrong is like blaming Madison Square Garden when the Knicks play badly.” U.N. Secretery-General Ban Ki Moon has suggested that nations are not cooperating during this fragile time with unprecedented levels of tense global conflict. Ban said that world leaders “have to sit down together with an open heart to negotiate in the interests of their people. The crises we’re experiencing cannot be solved by one person..I can bring world leaders to the river but I cannot force them to drink the water.”

The UN has undeniably had successes: They have helped fund anti-poverty programs, been a convener and vital hub for international conversation, offered significant aid after natural disasters, and helped secure innocent civilians in wartime. The UN does not have the power to simply stop warfare, it can play a role in trying to cool aggression.

The UN has certainly outperformed its immediate predecessor, the League of Nations. The League was established as part of the Treaty of Versailles after World War I, and was largely the result of the efforts of President Woodrow Wilson. Its stated purpose was to prevent future wars by having nations negotiate before conflict could commence. However, as President Wilson acknowledged, even in the event of a unanimous vote to employ sanctions against another nation that practiced territorial aggression, the vote was merely advisorial, not mandatory. Ironically, the United States Senate never became a member of the League, (the Senate rejected the Versailles Treaty).

Even without the United States, the League appeared to work at first, with minor disputes resolved during the 1920s. However, with the rise of nationalist fascism and aggression, the League quickly degenerated. Germany and Japan left the League in 1933, and the League proved powerless to establish sanctions against either, or during Italy’s invasion of Abyssinia. Then, in 1939, the League expelled the Soviet Union, a final irrelevant act, after which the League literally faded until after World War II, when there was a consensus that a new organization was desperately needed.

The United Nations had the benefits and liabilities of its members. The five Permanent Members of the Security Council, whose “no” vote was effectively a veto that would defeat any resolution, comprised a disparate lot of allies, from the leading colonial powers (United Kingdom, France) to the leading democratic, if still segregated, nation (United States), to the leading communist nation, then led by its most paranoid leader, Josef Stalin (Soviet Union), and finally, the weak and corrupt Nationalist China (until being replaced by the People’s Republic of China in 1971).

With such a group, it is a wonder that the UN has accomplished anything. Remarkably, one of it early successes was helping to form the state of Israel. On November 29, 1947, the United Nations General Assembly approved Resolution 181, which called for the creation of “Independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem” out of the (British-controlled) Palestine Mandate. In order to pass the resolution with a 33-13 (with 10 abstentions) vote, none of the Permanent Members of the Security Council vetoed the resolution. Thus, in a rare move, the United States and the Soviet Union (along with France) voted in favor of the resolution, while the United Kingdom and China abstained. Although the Arabs in Palestine and the surrounding nations opposed the resolution and Israel had to defend its existence, the UN Resolution helped legitimize the new state.

Over time, of course, the composition of the UN has changed, reflecting the newly freed colonies and the Third World Movement, the end of the Cold War, and the post-Cold War realities of a continually fluid and dangerous political environment. While Russia (including its former Soviet state) has cast the most vetoes (119), the United States is firmly in place with 83; all of these have been cast since 1970, and about half have been to defeat UN resolutions critical of Israel.

While there is currently much distasteful rhetoric at the UN, we should also remember that the United Nations works directly or indirectly with many organizations doing arguably useful work. These include the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the World Health Organization (WHO), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). In addition, the UN currently has nearly 100,000 peacekeeping forces in sixteen countries mostly in N. Africa, Haiti, and the Middle East. That we do not hear much of this may indicate that at least some of the UN peacekeeping function has been successful.

The UN has an uneven history. It may be impossible to have people look beyond their nationalism to work for the good of the world, but the UN has at least shown more progress than the League of Nations, and its affiliated organizations have made a solid contribution, even if the General Assembly disappoints us so very often.

As a Jew and citizen of America and the world, the conversation about the UN naturally leaves a bad taste in my mouth since the organization has been used to unfarily bully Israel and strengthen dangerous terrorist organizations, when it should be used more forcefully to condemn terror, combat anti-democratic activity, and support peace. On the other hand, there are many other global issues where we must embrace the crucial role the UN plays (or can potentially play). The UN must not merely be a vehicle to further our own self-interest. Rather, the agency will thrive when all parties see that the welfare of the world and the well-being of all humanity is our shared priority. This, of course, requires immense wisdom, humility, sacrifice, and conviction from all involved.

Imagine a world where we were left with no arbiter to govern nation-states. Even with all the troubling events occurring in the world, without the collective resources of the various sovereign nations, it is highly likely that there would be more conflict and at higher sustained periods. We must hold the UN accountable where it goes astray and celebrate its successes where they’re deserved. We cannot disengage but must proceed with caution. Striving to bring moral light to the world was never supposed to be easy.

 

Rabbi Dr. Shmuly Yanklowitz is the Executive Director of the Valley Beit Midrash, the Founder & President of Uri L’Tzedek, the Founder and CEO of The Shamayim V’Aretz Institute and the author of five books on Jewish ethics.  Newsweek named Rav Shmuly one of the top 50 rabbis in America.”

What grade would you give the United Nations? Read More »

No sign of Gaza talks breakthrough as cease-fire nears end

Talks in Cairo on ending the Gaza war showed no signs of a breakthrough on Monday, with Israel and the Palestinians entrenched in their demands hours before the expiry of a five-day cease-fire.

The truce is due to run out at 5.00 p.m. EDT. A Palestinian source quoted by Egypt's state news agency MENA said Egyptian mediators were making “a big effort to reach an agreement in the coming hours”.

Both sides said gaps remained in reaching a long-term deal that would keep the peace between Israel and militant groups in the Gaza Strip, dominated by Hamas Islamists, and allow reconstruction aid to flow in after five weeks of fighting.

Israeli Justice Minister Tzipi Livni addressed the prospect of renewed hostilities, while signaling that Israel would continue to hold its fire as long as Palestinians did the same.

“If they shoot at us, we will respond,” Livni, a member of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's security cabinet, told Israel Radio.

The Palestinian Health Ministry put the Gaza death toll at 2,016 and said most were civilians in the small, densely populated coastal territory. Sixty-four Israeli soldiers and three civilians in Israel have been killed.

Late on Sunday, a Palestinian official said Israel's position in the talks, as presented to them by Egyptian mediators, was a “retreat from what had already been achieved and discussions had returned to square one”.

The official, who was not named, told MENA that Israel had toughened its stance and had presented “impossible” demands, particularly on security issues. He said the Palestinians would review the situation and offer their response on Monday.

“We are determined to achieve the demands of our people and foremost is ending the aggression and launching the rebuilding process and lifting the Israeli-imposed blockade of the Gaza Strip,” MENA quoted the official as saying.

SECURITY

Netanyahu said on Sunday that any deal on the territory's future had to meet Israel's security needs. He warned Hamas it faced “harsh strikes” if it resumed its attacks.

Hamas also seeks the construction of a Gaza sea port and the reopening of an airport destroyed in previous conflicts, as part of any enduring halt to violence. Livni said such issues should be dealt with at a later stage.

Israel, which launched its offensive on July 8 after a surge in Hamas rocket fire across the border, has shown scant interest in making sweeping concessions, and has called for the disarming of militant groups in the enclave of 1.8 million people.

Hamas has said that laying down its weapons is not an option.

In Jerusalem, the Shin Bet internal security agency said it had arrested 93 Hamas activists in the West Bank over the past three months who had planned to carry out “serious attacks” in Israel, aiming to destabilize the region and eventually topple the Western-backed Palestinian Authority.

The Shin Bet allegations of a planned coup, in a statement that said Israeli authorities had confiscated 30 guns, seven rocket launchers and $170,000 from the group, were met with scepticism by Israeli media commentators.

“Would they have been able to do this? I don't know,” Roni Daniel, the well-connected military affairs correspondent for Israel's Channel Two television, said on-air.

Barak Ravid, the Haaretz newspaper's diplomatic affairs reporter, tweeted: “Israeli Shin Bet claims Hamas tried to take over the West Bank with 6 pistols, 7 RPG launchers and 20 M16 guns. Yeah right.”

The Gaza offensive has had broad public support in Israel, where militants' rockets, many of them intercepted by the Iron Dome anti-missile system, have disrupted everyday life but caused little damage and few casualties. By contrast, Israeli bombardment of Gaza has wrought widespread destruction.

The United Nations said 425,000 people in the Gaza Strip have been displaced by the conflict.

Israel and Hamas have not met face-to-face in Cairo, where the talks are being held in a branch of the intelligence agency, with Egyptian mediators shuttling between the parties in separate rooms. Israel regards Hamas, which advocates its destruction, as a terrorist group.

In Gaza, Pierre Krähenbühl, head of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, said he hoped cease-fire talks would lead to substantial change on the ground.

“There has to be a message of hope for the people of Gaza, there has to be a message for something different, there has to be a message of freedom for the people, freedom to move, freedom to trade,” Krähenbühl told reporters.

Additional reporting by Maggie Fick in Cairo; Writing by Jeffrey Heller in Jerusalem; editing by Ralph Boulton

No sign of Gaza talks breakthrough as cease-fire nears end Read More »

Talking Truth to…

I've been home from participating in Operation Protective Edge for about a week. I am in uniform no more, though I still wear my dog tags in solidarity with my brothers in arms, who,like all citizens of Israel, await the outcome of cease fire talks in Cairo. Because we never wanted this war. It was forced upon us by Hamas. The  current cease fire is set to expire Monday at Midnight Israel time. Hamas has repeatedly rejected and/or  violated each past cease fire, so no one knows what will happen with this one.

I admit to being a bit cranky. 

I don't think it's PTSD, though I've been to too many funerals, had a few too many close calls with rockets and mortars, had people with whom I'd celebrated the night before be killed the next day, seen chunks of the skull of a sixteen year old blown off by shrapnel from a mortar round I successfully dodged , only through luck and the grace of a loving G-d, who, I choose to believe, still has some  use for me on the planet.  

The song ” Fire and Rain ” is playing on the local oldies station and I think to myself , ” Oh James,you Sweet Hippie Child, you haven't seen anything,” 

You haven't been in a shelter during a rocket attack trying to comfort a little girl with nothing but the BS of an adult trying to comfort a child in a rocket attack, who knows better. You haven't seen people race for cover knowing they have only seven seconds before risking being blown apart. You haven't met people who've had to lock themselves in a so called safe room, while only a few hundred meters away a dozen terrorists , armed with anti tank missiles that could incinerate their home, machine guns, grenades, thousands of rounds of ammunition and hand cuffs, with which to take them prisoner and drag them through terrorist tunnels, into underground cells, are on the prowl, and they, this sweet family in a locked room, know that they are their targets. They will live or die in the next hour, depending upon  the skill and bravery of eighteen and nineteen year old boys and girls, who are willing to lay down their lives, not to promulgate any occupation, nor subjugate another people, but to protect their homes and families, and on this particular day, some of those kids will do just that. They will lay down their lives to protect this family and others like them. The terrorists ' secret ” Divine Victory Plan” to kill, maim and take hostage, Israeli men women and children will be foiled  and there will be new funerals of nineteen year olds who've given their lives to save the lives of that family huddled together behind a locked door in their home. And you think you've seen Fire and Rain, James? 

Since I'm back I've become appalled by the lack of journalistic integrity I've seen in some coverage, and the sheer ignorance in the coverage of others.

I like listening to NPR on week ends . They have a comedy game show called ” Wait, Wait Don't Tell Me. ” I'm driving from a friend's house and searching for it on the radio and an NPR news cast comes on. It's about Gaza , so reflexively, like all Israelis, I turn the sound up. Are we at war? Are rockets falling again? The  reporter comes on. She has well modulated, upper crust British Public School pronunciation, as she describes the plight of Palestinian Fisherman in Gaza who now have a five hundred meter limit placed on their fishing activities by the Israeli navy in the wake of the recent war. She describes it as if it is some cold hearted, at the very least , collective punishment of innocent Gazan Fisherman.

I mean how cruel can these Zionist oppressors of the the down trodden Gazan fishermen be?!.  

We're talking fishermen here!

Peter was a Fisherman. Jesus preached on the shores  of  the Sea of Galilee…to Fishermen! Just like these poor Palestinian Fishermen whom the Israelis cruelly limit to fishing only five hundred meters from shore!

Nazis!

I can almost see a new site to match “Jesus at the Checkpoint”, which tries to say if Jesus of Nazereth were alive today he would be a poor Palestinian, harassed by Roman- like, Jewish, Nazi soldiers at checkpoints in the West Bank. Jesus would be , were he alive today,  separated from his neighbors by ” The Apartheid Wall”! 

Never mind that the checkpoints were a response to, and preventative measure against, the suicide bombers who claimed a thousand Israeli lives, who blew up women and children in pizza parlors and Passover Seders.

As for the so called ” Apartheid Wall” it is a security fence, only three percent of which is a thirty foot high wall. And why is there even three percent which is a thirty foot high wall.? Because for years Palestinian terrorists from Kalkiliya and Tul Karem would shoot at cars on the Trans Israel highway and kill Israelis. And by the way, since the barrier has been there , it's stopped  almost a hundred percent of the suicide attacks. Period.

It's not Apartheid you bozo! It's self preservation! 

Twenty percent of Israel's population are Arabs, many of whom define themselves as Palestinian. They sit on our Supreme Court, which recently sent a former Israeli president and a former Israeli Prime Minister to Jail. They study and teach in our universities, serve in our military, are doctors and nurses in our hospitals, and enjoy the protection of the least corrupt , most liberal judiciary in the entire Middle East. Indeed no Arab country affords them the rights they have as citizens of Israel. Does that sound like Apartheid to you? I'll tell you what sounds like Apartheid. It is the fact that virtually every Palestinian leader has said that not one Jew will remain in a Palestinian state once it is created. In other words Judenrein. Jew Free. Hitler's wet dream

But I digress. 

Pardon the rant. I said I was cranky. Back to the poor Gazan fishermen who can't fish beyond a five hundred meter limit imposed by the Israeli navy during the current war. What this Brit twit of an Oxbridge reporter fails to mention is that Hamas terrorists attempted to stage a water born terrorist attack on Zikkim beach near the Israeli city of Ashkelon. Happily, they were engaged and killed by some more 19 year old Israeli kids willing to lay down their lives to protect the Israeli civilian farmers at Kibbutz Zikkim, where the terrorists were headed. THAT'S why there's a five hundred meter  restriction! Because Hamas terrorists , posing as poor Gazan fisherman, indeed, tried to carry out a terrorist attack against our civilians.Gazan  fisherman are paying the price for Hamas terrorist attacks on Israeli civilians. But the Oxbridge modulated tones never mention that. They just sadly intone her name,and solemnly bare witness to yet another  Israeli act of  tyranny.  

Gimme a break!

Do your homework you twit. Keep your prejudice , if you like, in the melodrama you wrote in your head before you ever even got there, but provide at least a little bit of context. Whattaya say?

All of which brings me to Jon Voigt.

Mr. Voigt recently penned an open letter to Javier Bardem and his equally talented wife, Penelope Cruz, for signing an open letter condemning Israel as a war criminal without once mentioning the name , let alone the deeds of Hamas. Mr. Voigt took them to task and recounted Israel's history in a workman like fashion, hoping to educate them, and his readers regarding the facts leading up to the current conflict.  

Mr. Voigt has thus, recently been taken to task himself, by two members of Academia who have chosen to identify with the down trodden, put upon , maligned and much misunderstood freedom fighters of Hamas. 

They have done so by taking their stand  against the capitalist, pig, oppressors of the Palestinian masses, namely the dreaded Zionists. 

They flaunt their academic credentials  to poor Mr. Voigt, a mere actor, and present the true facts and myths surrounding Israel, even going so far as to cite like minded Jewish and Israeli academics, in order to enlighten the aforementioned, and hoplessly naive Mr. Voigt.  They, after all, have written and edited books specializing on ( their grammar , not mine) the history and contemporary realities of Israel, Zionism and Palestine. The conclusion which the professors have drawn is that the United States and Israel are to blame ” for the suffering Israel has inflicted on the Palestinian people” And to ice that academic cake, and bolster their argument to  irrefutable heights, which, no mere actor could ever hope to scale, they quote that leading expert on all things Middle Eastern, none other than John Leibowitz! Oh…what's the matter ? You never heard of John Leibowitz?

That's because this particular proud Jewish comic, unlike guys named  Seinfeld, Sandler, and Stiller, felt he couldn't make it merely on his talent. I mean, who ever heard of a Jewish Comedian?!. So he anglicized himself into becoming  a homey of the Oxbridge Patron Saint of Palestinian Fisherman, and thus, was born again as, Jon Stewart.

I like Jon Stewart.

I think  Jon Stewart's a funny guy.

I think he's so funny in fact, he could even have made it even if his name was Leibowitz. 

But I'd no more depend on his analysis of the current conflict in the Middle East, than I would consult with Dr. Pepper about a medical condition. Dr. Pepper's a heck of a soft drink. But by Doctors, he's no doctor..

So this is not an open letter to these two bozos of new left chic Academia. But it is a refutation of the same talking points raised by their fellow travelers seeking to de legitimize Israel's very right to exist as the sovereign nation state of the Jewish people. First of all what you have to understand is,  the very notion of a sovereign Jewish state, within any borders, is anathema to this crowd. They live in an enlightened, post nationalistic mindset, where the only people in the Middle East,  entitled to be nationalists , in fact, are those who wish to establish, not a nation, but a Caliphate.

Regarding the birth of Israel in 1948,  Mr. Voigt rightly sites it having come about as a result of Israel's acceptance of the 1947 UN plan to partition Palestine into two states, one Jewish and one Arab. The Arab League and the Palestinians, represented by their revered leader Haj Amin Al Husseini, rejected the partition plan and the establishment of ANY  Jewish State within ANY borders, and as Mr. Voigt pointed out,  Israel was subsequently ” attacked by five surrounding Arab countries committed to driving them into the sea” 

The professors counter that poor Mr. Voigt has been taken in by a Zionist myth. ” This is a distortion of the actual history, which saw Zionism arrive on the soil of a Palestine that was already in the midst of its own modernization” The Zionists , they state, deployed ” The conquest of labor” and then ” the conquest of the land” to increasingly powerful effect once the British conquered Palestine in 1917″ 

I have heard this particular talking point  from various radical left  Professors who have almost inexplicably cast their lot with misogynistic, gay hating, democracy hating, female genital mutilating, child bride abusing, murderous thug terrorists! I am a child of the left. I attended my first civil rights march at the age of ten. My first presidential campaign was for Jack Kennedy and my second was for Bobby. You can still find my blog supporting Barack Obama's first election on the Huffington Post. To have people who proclaim that they are for the universal rights of man, for equality of the sexes, for peace and justice, side with Hamas terrorists and claim their superiority over a Western democracy like Israel, makes me want to puke at the very perversity of the notion. 

As the saying goes, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.

So what exactly was this ” soil of a Palestine.. already in the midst of its own modernization” when Zionisim arrived? Well let's quote someone who was there, on that very soil a mere fifteen years before Zionism arrived. Mark Twain toured the Holy land in 1867. Zionism arrived in 1882. What was the soil that Twain, no slouch of a social observer he, saw and described in his book , ” Innocents Abroad”?

In describing the Valley of Jezreel, he states ” There is not a solitary village throughout it's whole extent – not thirty miles in either direction. There are two or three clusters of Bedouin tents, but not a single permanent habitation. One may ride ten miles, hereabouts, and not see ten human beings”. 

I mention the Valley of Jezreel in particular, because that's where I was partially raised, went to high school, from whence I went into the army, where I was married, where I taught high school and farmed and wrote and where my first born son, of blessed memory, was born. ” I know the Valley of Jezreel as well as I know any place on earth. It is the bread basket of Israel, home to some of the most successful and stunning agriculture on earth. It is alive and bustling with farming villages, schools , colleges, high tech industry, and agriculture R&D that is the envy of the world. It abounds in forests , each tree of which was bought and paid for by Jews around the world, as was the land itself, which was stolen from not one Palestinian, because it was worthless and desolate and sold at inflated prices to the Jews who were so insane they paid handsomely for barren soil, which they turned into paradise through….” The conquest of Labor”!

There was a time when leftists actually praised labor!. But this was Jewish labor. Jews working with their hands in back breaking labor and I am old enough to have actually known that founding generation, and their love of that land which was as bare and desolate as when Twain first visited , they made bloom through ” the conquest of labor”. Unlike these pious Academic poseurs, they engaged in back breaking work to plant forests and create thriving agricultural villages. They were idealistic young students who displaced no one in their ” conquest of the land” which any enlightened progressive today, should realize was carried out by the oldest and most effective ecological society in the world, The Jewish National Fund, which saw to it that Israel was the only nation on earth to enter the twenty-first century with more trees than it had in the century before. And you creeps dare to distort that into some kind of crime!?

Here's is Twain's description of the Galilee before the arrival of Zionism, ” These un peopled deserts, these rusty mounds of bareness, that never, never, never do shake the glare from their harsh outlines…; that melancholy ruin of Capernaum, this stupid village of Tiberias, slumbering under six funereal palms…A desolation here that not even imagination can grace with the pomp of life and action”. That was the Galilee then. Visit it today and be amazed at ” the pomp of life and action” all of which was brought in through the conquest of labor of the Zionist Jews literally reclaiming the land from the desert it had become.

Regarding Israel's acceptance of the 1947 UN partition plan and the Arab/ Palestinian rejection of same, the professors state, ”  ” The Zionist leadership ” accepted” the terms of the 1947 Partition Plan. In reality, they had little intention of actually fulfilling them, and over the next year , through inter communal conflict and then all out war, three quarters of a million Palestinians were permanently forced from their homes”.

Again the intellectual dishonesty by supposed academics is simply staggering..

Here are the facts:

There never was a state of Palestine. Never. Not once in history. Prior to WWI , what is called Palestine , which comprised Israel of today, Gaza, Judea and Samaria and all of Jordan, comprised a sleepy backwater province of the Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans sided with the Germans, In WWI,  and for those who don't remember, they lost the war. The League of Nations, fore runner of the UN, broke up the old Ottoman empire and at the San Remo Conference of 1921, passed a resolution ” In favor of the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people..” The resolution went on to state ” Whereas recognition has thereby been given to the historical connexion of the Jewish people with Palestine, and to the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country…” the resolution went on to appoint Britain to have a mandate over Palestine  which” shall be responsible for placing the country under such political, administrative and economic conditions  as will secure the establishment of the Jewish national home,..The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control and Government of any foreign power” 

That last point is particularly important because Britain, in contravention of its  duties as a mandatory power, lopped off the bulk of the territory and created out of whole cloth, with 70% of what was to have been the Jewish National home , a Palestinian Arab country, and called it Transjordan, which today is known simply as Jordan. But under international law it was to have been part of ” The Jewish National Home”!

In 1936 following Arab massacres of ancient Jewish communities in Hebron and Safed, The British appointed the Peel Commission, which offered to partition the 30% of remaining land into two states; one Jewish and one Arab. TWO THIRDS of the state would have gone to the Palestinian Arabs and one third to the Jews. . The Palestinian Jews  accepted the plan and the Arabs, who called themselves Arabs, and not Palestinians, again led by Haj Amin Al Husseini rejected it. The Jews accepted this tiny enclave for one reason. It was 1937 and they knew what was about to happen to the Jews of Germany and Europe. When Hitler wanted to rid Europe of its Jews, not one country in the world would take them in and they literally went up in the smoke and ash of the crematoria of Hitler's death camps. Had Israel been born, even in it's Lilliputian form in 1937, six million Jews and all their descendants would have been alive today. 

But,  say the esteemed academic supporters and enablers of Hamas and their ilk, that just proves their point. The Palestinians had no part in the holocaust, and yet they were made to pay the price by accepting into their midst the European survivors of European mass murder, that had nothing to do with them. 

Really? Really?

Here are the facts, yet again, troublesome as I know they are.

When Britain went to war against Nazi Germany, the Jews of Palestine rushed to enlist in the British Army and eventually formed the Jewish Brigade which, together with it's predecessor Jewish Palestinian units,  fought valiantly in North Africa and in Europe,and played their part in the defeat of Nazi Germany.

And where was Haj Amin Al Husseini, the revered leader, indeed founder, ( and uncle of Yasser Arafat) of the Palestinian Arab Nattonal Movement?  

He was Hitler's poodle in Berlin. 

So don't peddle this revisionist crap that the Palestinians had no part in the extermination of European Jewery and Nazi war crimes, because their leader Haj Amin Al Husseini sure as hell did!

He met with Mussolini and Himmler and Eichman and Hitler himself.

He joined the Nazi war effort by helping recruit MUSLIM UNITS under German SS command that were responsible for mass murders in Croatia and Hungary. 

Indeed Yugoslavia sought to have Haj Amin Al Husseini indicted for war crimes, for his role in recruiting 20,000 Muslims, who participated in mass murders of Jews and others in Central Europe. In 1944,  on Radio Berlin, Haj Amin Al Husseini, the father of the Palestinian National movement said ” Arabs, rise as one man and fight for your sacred rights. Kill the Jews wherever you find them! This pleases God, history and religion!”

He issued a statement saying ' Those lands suffering under the British and Bolshevik yoke impatiently await the moment when the Axis powers will emerge victorious. We must deicate ourselves to unceasing struggle against Britain, that dungeon of peoples.”

That's what the leader of the Palestinian Arabs was doing when my foster father and the other members of His Majesty's Jewish Brigade were fighting and defeating the Nazis in Europe.

As to the 1948 War of Liberation, far from being invaded by five surrounding Arab countries determined to make the Mediterranean red with the blood of the Jews, the professors claim that the Arab forces were minimal and badly trained and equipped, and were sent to prevent themselves from looking like collaborators, and to prevent their rival , Haj Amin Al Husseini ” from establishing a state”. 

Wait a second! Did these Bozos just say the Arab armies invaded the nascent state of Israel to PREVENT THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A PALESTINIAN STATE?! 

You bet. That's what they said. The Arabs, not the Israelis, prevented the establishment of a Palestinian state. 

Egypt conquered Gaza and annexed it, without giving its inhabitants benefit of Egyptian citizenship. 

Jordan annexed the West Bank and all the Palestinians there became Jordanian citizens. And by the way no one at the time suggested ever turning those lands into a Palestinian state. At those times when they referred to occupied territory, they were talking about, and Hamas STILL  talks about TEL AVIV!!!

As to how badly trained and equipped the poor five invading Arab armies were..no less an expert than General George Marshal , Chairman of the Joint Chiefs during WWII and President Truman's most trusted advisor said that if the Jews declared independence they would be wiped out within two week. And he was right to think so. The ” poorly equipped ” Egyptians had a 10,000 man armored column less than an hour and a half drive from Tel Aviv. There was not one Israeli soldier between them and Israel's largest city. On the next morning they would drive into Tel Aviv and the two thousand year old dream of a Jewish state would be over. And what did those colonialist , imperialist, pig, Zionists have, with which to fight that 10,000 man armored column? 

They had four Czeck built ME 109 fighter planes which had been smufggled into Israel in pieces, re assembled in hangars, had never been test flown, had never had their weapons test fired, possessed neither avionics nor radios so the pilots had to communicate with each other with hand signals, and for aeronautical charts had Palestine Auto Club road maps and boyscout compasses glued to the dashboards.

I know because I am privileged to know the man who lead the attack of those four ME109s. He refers to me as his younger brother and it is one of the greatest honors of my life to be counted as his friend. His name is Lou Lenart. He and his three other pilots were told that the fate of the Jewish state rested on their shoulders. They were to take off and stop that armored column. I f they failed, Israel was dead. Lou pulled out onto the tarmac, looked behind him at the three other planes and saw the entire Israeli Air Force.  

But they did it. 

They stopped the Egyptian column dead in its tracks and bought Israel the time it needed to survive.

Of the four pilots , they suffered fifty percent casualties on their first mission.

In Israel's war of Liberation in 1948 it lost one percent of its population killed. That would be the equivalent of America losing three million killed in one year. America has lost a little over one percent of that number in ten years of combat and they say America is War Weary. What do you think Israel was?

Finally, these mouth pieces for terrorist thugs, wrapping themselves in the robes of Academia, claim that it was Israel which started this current war, and not Hamas.

But that's quite simply a lie. 

And we know it's a lie because Hamas did not start digging those thirty two terrorist attack tunnels,  when Israel started it's aerial campaign against them.  Those tunnels were an offensive weapon which was to have handed Hamas their “shock and awe”, their 911 moment, that would have brought Israel to it's knees. They began digging those tunnels five years ago with the cement and steel they stole from their own people, with the cement and steel that was meant to rebuild Gaza, to build schools and hospitals and prenatal clinics. And instead they used it to build terrorist attack tunnels under Israel's internationally recognized 1967 border, aimed exclusively against Israeli civilians, whom they would have murdered , maimed and taken hostage by the dozens bringing Israel to it's knees. This was their offense, planned and executed at the time of their chosing. But following their doctrine of carrying out terrorist attacks, and then claiming the mantle of victimhood, with so called academics as their mouth pieces and enablers, they had to make it look like it was a response to Israeli aggression. So they PUBLICLY ordered the kidnap murder of three Israeli school boys on their way home from school. 

And Israel didn't fire a shot into Gaza. They just engaged in a campaign to round up Hamas terrorists in Judea and Samaria where the boys had been kidnapped and killed. 

Then Hamas started firing rockets at Israel and Israel said repeatedly ' Calm will be answered with Calm” 

They must have thought to themselves , ” What's a guy got to do to start a war with these Jews?!” 

Then they upped their rocket attacks to a hundred a day and Israel still said “calm will be answered with calm” while they began their aerial campaign.  

Finally a ceasefire was to have taken affect. 

Israel accepted it.

Hamas rejectedit by launching a major rocket barrage, and then the first ff six terrorist tunnel attacks, and that's when Israel had no choice but to respond with a ground invasion to take out what was indeed an existential threat. 

Of the 1800 Palestinians killed in this conflict, 1600 of them would be alive today if Hamas had only accepted the cease fire Israel accepted immediately and unconditionally.  

But like I said, they weren't interested in a cease fire.

This was their war and they thought they could win it. 

And don't you buy the crap these so called academics are peddling, that Hamas was the duly democratically elected government of Gaza. Hamas took power , not in an election, but in a bloody coup, machine gunning their fellow Palestinians, blindfolding, binding and throwing them off of multi story buildings. They have terrorized their own people, not only Israel. Their people, indeed, live under the yoke of occupation, but not by Israel , by Hamas. 

And as for the apologists and enablers of Hamas, who contribute to the misery of Palestinians and Israelis alike, while sitting in their club chairs in the faculty lounge, may I suggest that from now on they speak only through the orafice which Mr. Voigt has so eloquently enlarged for them, since what they are peddling is pure, unadulterated crap…

Talking Truth to… Read More »

Seeing clearly in Tel Aviv

There is nothing unusual about sitting at Café Hemda on Ibn Gvirol Street in Tel Aviv and spotting your teenage son zip by on a bicycle.

Unless your son does not know how to ride a bicycle.

And is not wearing his glasses.

We visited Israel for a month this summer.  Yes, for that month.  We spent more time in dark stairwells and dusty shelters than should be allowed by law in any country with a Mediterranean climate.  But there was drama before the war as well, before we even made plans to come to Israel, the kind of drama any outsider would observe, listening in on one of our typical family discussions, and sum up with a single symbol: ?

If you are a Zionist living in a small town in Virginia, on a street whose corner is crowned with a liquor store—or heck, even on a street without a liquor store—there are only so many Shabbat candles you can light, so many Jewish folktales you can toss at your children, so many jars of gefilte fish you can go through, before the whole family arrives at the same conclusion independently:  Something is not working.  

But what, exactly?

It would be folly to claim (though fun to try) that because we reside in the Diaspora, my three boys don’t know how to ride a bicycle, swim, fry an egg, or buy a loaf of bread.  But if one’s inner life works in synch with one’s outer life, and the center of the former revolves not around a synagogue or clapping at a klezmer concert, but being hammered at the dinner table with an inverted appeal by Moses Mendelssohn from two hundred years ago to “Be a Jew at home and in the street,” how will one’s posture ever be primed for activities requiring you to stand up straight?

Of course, to avoid getting struck by shrapnel while in a moving vehicle, you should follow the instructions of the Israeli Home Front Command and lie down on the ground, putting off that exhilarating feeling of being a Free People in our own Land for a few more minutes while being prepared to get your pants dirty.  But if shrapnel happens to land on Ben Yehuda Street, a few meters down from the synagogue where your son’s best friend is having his bar mitzvah the very next day, it is probably safe to wear white, as shrapnel is unlikely to fall in the same place twice, and in any case, you will be arriving on foot.

But back to that Something that wasn’t Working:  It could all be a coincidence that within a week of arriving in Israel, one of my sons learned how to ride a bicycle, another to swim, and the third to make pancakes.  Worried sick by this news, my mother demanded a return to the status quo, to their grandchildren with my chin glued to their shoulders and a threat of elderberry extract already in the mail.  But I am not naïve: just as, in Virginia, I instructed my kids not to accept any inebriated bear hugs while sitting on the front porch, so too did I inform them of a recent article I read, locating a large number of assaults on children in the stairwells of apartments.  Do not linger in those places, I stressed.  Even in the Israel that we love.

Of course, if a siren sounds and your friend’s apartment building is not equipped with a bomb shelter, that sinister space will become your savior, Kids, and anyone who had hoped to catch you alone on your way to Emanuel’s or Eitan’s with a carton of eggs tucked under your arm will be deterred by the half dozen people greeting each other like newfound family.  So, yalla, let’s thank Hamas for making Israel a little bit safer and go to the beach.

And Natan?  Put on your glasses.  Now.


Dalia Rosenfeld is a graduate of the Iowa Writers' Workshop.  Her work has appeared in The Atlantic Monthly, Agni, The Daily Forward, Mississippi Review, Bellingham Review, Michigan Quarterly Review, Moment Magazine, Zeek, Jewcy, and Carve. She lives with her husband and three children in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Seeing clearly in Tel Aviv Read More »

Palestinians view Meshaal’s role during war as ‘positive’

This story originally appeared on themedialine.org.

Despite talk of popular pique at Khaled Meshaal because of his accumulated wealth and impetuous goading of Israel from the safe distance of 1,200 miles while the Gaza Strip suffered carnage and devastation, the Hamas leader-in-exile has nevertheless emerged from the month-long siege of Gaza with a solid majority of Gazans feeling he casts a “positive” image. According to one Palestinian pundit, Meshaal is rising from the ashes of Gaza as the figure its residents most desire to lead them.

According to Dr. Hani Al-Basoos, a Gaza-based security and political analyst, it’s exactly the distance between Gaza and Doha where Meshaal lives that was instrumental in honing his image and solidifying his leadership role. Other leaders – the ones who remained in Gaza, albeit underground during the fighting — were removed from the public’s daily perception, Al-Basoos told The Media Line. “You could not see any one of them because they might be a target for an Israeli air strike.” Meshaal has profound edge over the Gaza-shut-in leadership in his ability to move around and be seen constantly on television, often from Qatar. His prominence in the Egyptian-mediated talks also provided him with access to Cairo that would arguably be denied to him because of Hamas’ relationship to the Muslim Brotherhood, banned and vilified by the Al-Sisi regime.

The 58-year old Hamas leader was born near Jerusalem and moved to Kuwait shortly after the outbreak of the 1967 war and joined the Muslim Brotherhood in 1971. When former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1991, Meshaal moved to Jordan where he became the Hamas bureau chief. Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu suffered one of the largest embarrassments during his first term of office in 1997 when he ordered Meshaal poisoned for his role in attacks against Israeli citizens. But the assassination attempt failed and resulted in a deal struck between Netanyahu and an angry King Hussein, through which Meshaal was provided with the antidote to the poison.

Following years of living in Damascus under the protection of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad, Meshaal was in all practicality exiled again as the civil war heated up, placing the Hamas leader in an uncomfortable political position. His move to Doha was predictable based on the strong support Qatar provides to Hamas. Once the fighting began in the Gaza Strip, his access and visibility became far greater than Gaza-based chief Ismail Haniyyeh or any of his other comrades and according to many, making him the best choice to lead Hamas.  

In the opinion of Al-Basoos, the Meshaal paradigm will stay around for the foreseeable future. “Any leader of Hamas that follows, will have to be outside of Palestine because he will have to have freedom of movement and a relationship with the international community,” the Islamic University professor told The Media Line. He said Hamas was losing popularity during the four or five months leading up to the Gaza war,  but has since regained what was lost and added to it as a result of its confrontation with Israel.  “Because of its ability to fight the occupation forces, it gained more popularity and if we have elections now, Hamas will most likely win,” he said.

During the first two weeks of fighting, the Arab World for Research and Development (AWRAD) polled 300 West Bank Palestinians and 150 Palestinians deemed to be “opinion leaders” on issues relating to the war. Because of the war, it was not possible to poll Gazans. The result of the citizens’ poll was that 66% of West Bankers – presumed to be Fatah-leaning – believe Meshaal played a positive role during the Gaza war while only 13% felt Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’s role was equally positive. Although the “opinion leaders” disagreed, finding Meshaal’s role as negative, they did agree that “Abbas did not do a good job.”

“For the first time in three or four years, we’ve seen that support for Hamas has increased and bypassed Fatah in the West Bank,” said AWRAD General Director Dr. Nader Saeed, explaining that the questions were very specific to how every leader is dealing with the subject of a cease-fire.  

Hamas polled 31% “positive” to Fatah’s 25%. “This a major decline for support of Fatah from 40% and that’s an 11% increase of support for Hamas. For Meshaal, in terms of the resistance, in terms of the war in Gaza, he is doing well because he is part of a product position. But personally, I don’t think he has a chance [of winning out over Fatah/Abbas] among Palestinians because he is outside of Palestine and is seen as a follower of regional politics instead of Palestinian politics,” opined Saeed.

He also predicts that Hamas’ popularity will revert to pre-war levels and Meshaal’s personal popularity along with it. Disagreeing with Al Basoos, he says Palestinians will ultimately favor former Hamas Prime Minister Haniyyeh. “Under the rubble now, a great deal of the truth is missing. It’s a “lose-lose” situation for Hamas and Meshaal, ‘when things settle down in Gaza.’”

Saeed says the bigger question is what the future holds for Abbas and Fatah and whether their popularity will return. The Palestinian President was harshly criticized by the people for having what was perceived to be an inactive role and for keeping a low profile during the Gaza war.

 “I don’t think Abbas and Fatah will be able to return to their pre-war standing.” Hamas is going through a crisis and is trying to present itself as a defender of Palestinian rights, Saeed says. But the reality of it is that they are relying on Qatar and Turkey to support their position while it’s Egypt that is “the main pillar of Palestinian politics. People know that Egypt has fought wars for Palestine,” he says. He uses the waning popularity of Al-Jazeera television as proof of Qatar’s declining influence. The Qatar-based network has lost 50% (25%, down from 75%) of its Palestinian viewership during the past 3 years. “More and more people are seeing Al-Jazeera and Qatar as trying to divide Palestinians,” according to Saeed.

Jordan-based analyst Daoud Kuttab agrees that “Meshaal and Hamas came out of the war stronger than they were before the fighting, but says, “I don’t think this popularity will be long lived and I doubt it will translate directly to high votes in national elections,” he told The Media Line.

Kuttab says that the situation on the ground and internal Palestinian unity has precedence over all other issues and admonishes Palestinians not to accept conditions that go against their higher interests.

 “Qatar has acted as it has in the past using its money, media and other influences to remind the world that Qatar exists and must be taken seriously,” he said. The Egyptian website, “Dotmasr” quoted a former Egyptian official as saying Qatar paid Hamas $50 billion dollars not to agree to the first cease-fire proposed by Egypt, the acceptance of which would arguably have prevented 90% of the Palestinian casualties.

But Al-Basoos is skeptical of the report, calling it “baseless.” He says this is not the first time Qatar and Egypt have exchanged accusations.  While he says Qatar does not have the political and military capabilities that Egypt has, Doha, he says, would never use its money to harm the Palestinians.  He also says that Israel would never allow Qatar to be the mediator and Egypt is the only state that can “get the Palestinians and Israelis to some middle ground.”

Meanwhile, Kuttab says he would have liked Abbas or at least Palestinian Prime Minister Hamdallah to be in Gaza during the war.  “But,” he says, “the time for politics is after the guns stop.”

Palestinians view Meshaal’s role during war as ‘positive’ Read More »

The two most disturbing aspects of the halted arms shipment

The Obama administration’s decision to halt a transfer of Hellfire missiles requested by Israel — a decision first reported by The Wall Street Journal and later confirmed by administration officials in both governments — has expectedly raised the level of chatter concerning the U.S.-Israel “crisis.” Several worthy comments (and other less worthy ones) have been made about the incident. I’d like to add some of my own.

A show about nothing — or is it?

The most important and most troubling fact about this leak of sensitive information — a leak that was probably meant to publically put Israel on watch — is that it lacks explainable coherence. Usually, when the strong party of an alliance (in this case, the U.S.) puts the weaker party (in this case, Israel) on watch, there is an immediate reason. The U.S. wants something; Israel is unwilling to accept the American position; the administration puts pressure on Israel; Israel caves (or not). 

Consider these two examples:

In August 1982, Ronald Reagan told Israel’s Prime Minister Menachem Begin that the bombing of Beirut “had to stop or our entire future relationship was endangered” (that is how Reagan retold the story of the famous conversation in his diary). The New York Times reported at the time about the conversation, quoting the harsh White House statement: “The President telephoned Prime Minister Begin concerning the most recent bombing and shelling in Beirut. … The President made clear that it is imperative that the cease-fire in place be observed absolutely. … It must hold.”

Next story: Ten years later, the U.S. — this time it was the Bush administration — was pressuring Israel: Halt the settlement-building in the West Bank and in the Gaza Strip, or you will not get the $10 billion worth of U.S. guarantees that Israel needs for absorbing immigrants from the former Soviet Union.

Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir refused to cave, but at least it was clear what the U.S. wants and the price of refusing to play along.

The current punishment is a mystery. We don’t know what it is that the U.S. is trying to achieve by halting the shipment of arms. I see several possibilities (there are probably more):

A. To generally humiliate Netanyahu: Surely, there is no great love between this administration and the Netanyahu government, and holding the shipment can be just one of these tit-for-tat insults with no clear purpose in mind. If this is the case, that’s, well, childish.

B. To try to make Netanyahu more flexible at the Cairo negotiations: If this is the case, it means, as David Horovitz wrote, the U.S. is actively assisting Hamas (Horovitz made an even larger claim — that at this point, any public brawl between the U.S. and Israel serves Hamas).

C. To pressure Israel into doing something else that Israel refuses to do, something that hasn’t yet been made public: If this is the case, we will probably get more hints in the coming days as to the matter under dispute.

If I needed to put my money on one of the options, I’d pick option A — the public humiliation about nothing. This means that the relations between the governments have reached such a low point that they no longer even need a reason to come at each other. Of course, this makes the Obama administration look pretty bad, and its policy unexplainable. Vindictiveness and pettiness are not exactly a sign of a healthy, thoughtful and effective foreign policy. But it should also make the Netanyahu government more worried, because this means that American punishment will now be served without even giving Israel a choice — it will not even give Israel a chance to cave under pressure or withstand pressure.

Obama no longer cares about pretense.

Seth Mandel made the argument (in Commentary), that by halting the shipments the Obama administration lost its “last, desperate defense” on Israel. I’ve heard similar claims from other Americans who are, admittedly, not the greatest Obama admirers.

The argument goes as follows: In the last six years of rocky relations, there were many periods of great tension between the two governments over this or that issue. On such occasions, when the dispute was made public and the Obama administration had to confront questions about its commitment to Israel, it used to argue that on matters of security its support is rock solid. In fact, National Security Advisor Susan Rice made that case just two weeks ago: “Our commitment to protect Israel’s qualitative military edge remains absolute. Just ask Israel’s generals. Our security assistance to Israel is at a record high.” And Israel, for good reasons, played along on many of these occasions — as when Netanyahu, following Obama’s reelection, congratulated him and emphasized the “rock solid” “security relations.”

Truly, the differentiation between “security relations” and other relations is awkward to begin with. Security doesn’t only rely on arms shipments, but also on many other things, among which is the backing of a superpower. If the U.S. sends arms to Israel but wants it to compromise on its security vis-à-vis Hamas, the claim of “rock solid” security relations becomes harder to defend. Yet Mandel’s argument goes further and claims that even if security or defense is narrowly defined, “now we know that the president is not fully committed to Israel’s security.”

Is that true? I am not certain it is, but I think Mandel is on to something.

On the one hand, I don’t think it’s true because a halt of one, or even five, shipments of arms, when Israel can clearly do without them for now, is not yet a clear statement of carelessness regarding Israel’s security. A reasonable defense of Obama’s action would be: 1. If this becomes urgent for Israel’s security he’d release the shipment, and 2. While he did delay a shipment, he has still sent a lot of arms to Israel — possibly more than some predecessors.

So I don’t see a clear-cut case here for “Obama doesn’t care about Israel’s security.” But I do see something else that is quite disturbing: Obama no longer cares if people say that he doesn’t care about Israel’s security.

Let me explain: For six years it was important for the administration to separate “security relations” from “diplomatic relations,” because the separation enabled it to keep wrapping itself in a “supportive of Israel” garment even as it was having bitter fights with the Israeli government. When relations were very tense, the pretense of them being still very strong was important for the Obama administration to maintain. Of course, part of it is because it is true: the relations are still strong. The U.S. and Israel have ties strong enough to sustain a period of tension between the two governments.

Enter the latest report, which ruins it for Obama, or at least significantly damages it. Suddenly, the Obama administration decided to send a blow in the one area that was supposedly a no-entry-zone.

This can mean one of two things:

Either the Obama team realized that Israel pays no attention unless a message is sent in this most-sensitive arena. And it wants Israel to pay attention to something (see the above mentioned three possibilities).

Or the Obama team no longer cares what observers might think about its Israel policy and is no longer troubled about the possibility of losing its main “we-support-Israel” propaganda tool.

If it no longer cares to be seen as supportive of Israel, this is a significant change from what we’ve seen in the last six years. This is a change that is much more significant than one shipment of Hellfire missiles.

The two most disturbing aspects of the halted arms shipment Read More »

For Israelis in the western Negev, each day is ‘Russian Roulette’

When the tzeva adom, red alert, screams its siren as Yasmine Parda eats out in Ashkelon at her favorite restaurant, she waits and hopes for the best—no rocket shelters are reachable by foot within the siren’s reported 15-second warning interval.

“We sit in the restaurant and wait,” said the 27-year-old secretary as she stopped for a few moments along Yig’al Alon Street in Sderot on Aug. 14, the morning after a five-day ceasefire between Israel and Hamas was announced.

Paya Amirov, Parda’s friend, described her life as a game of “Russian Roulette”—she can’t know whether the next minute, hour, or day will be quiet or chaotic, with the ever-present possibility of needing to drop everything and run from scorching metal and shrapnel that falls from the sky shortly after being fired from the neighboring Gaza Strip.

Michal Tweeto, who lives on Moshav Tkuma, a community next to Gaza, with her husband and three children, brought two of her kids—Tova, 5, and Avraham, 3—to a massive indoor playground and community center in Sderot so they could enjoy some respite for the day. In recent weeks, the kids have barely been able to leave the house. And even during this ceasefire, there’s no guarantee of safety.

“My kids are afraid. That’s the biggest problem for me,” Tweeto said. “I’m more afraid from the trauma than from the rockets.”

At the $5 million, 21,000-square-foot facility, which was built by the Jewish National Fund (JNF) in 2009, recreation rooms and play areas double as bomb shelters, giving parents like Tweeto the peace of mind that they enjoyed before 2001, when rocket fire from neighboring Gaza became a regular occurrence.

Located in an old warehouse on the eastern edge of Sderot, the facility has basketball courts, a café, computers and a small movie theater. On a recent visit, the happy screams of children playing rang through the air as parents sat at tables and socialized with each other.

This $5 million, 21,000 square foot indoor rec center in Sderot was built by the Jewish National Fund in 2009 as a response to rocket fire.

Just one mile away from the indoor playground, another stark reminder of life here, particularly for children, is made apparent by a large structure on an outdoor playground on Ha-Rakefet Street. Artfully built into the playground, the structure looks like a large friendly snake with a hollowed out interior play area.

This snake-like structure on an outdoor playground doubles as a bomb shelter.

Approaching it, though, a sign on it reads in Hebrew: “When the tzeva adom sounds, you have to enter under my protection beyond the orange line.”

This sign at an outdoor Sderot playground tells children to enter the inside of what is a playful looking snake if they hear the “red alert” siren.

Moshe and Linor Barsheshet, Netivot residents who came for the day to the indoor JNF playground with their two children, Haddas and Yonatan, left home for Beit Shemesh during the war and returned during the first cease fire two weeks ago.

Government officials asked residents in the south to return home, expecting that the cease-fire would hold—Hamas broke it on the morning of Aug. 8, firing a volley of rockets over the border and further shattering the confidence of many locals.

“It’s impossible to leave the house,” Moshe said.

Arnold Rosenblum, who came to Israel five years ago from Russia, recently moved to Sderot to enroll at Sapir College. Walking in the downtown shopping area, Rosenblum, 23, sat down for a few minutes to speak with a reporter.

“What can I say?” Rosenblum said, asked how the rockets and sirens have impacted his life. “We are getting used to this. First time is very hard and you really think maybe you should leave Sderot.”

After that initial shock, though, he said, the regular interruptions just become normal. “I say like this: if I made a choice to live here, no Hamas, no someone else can make me change my choice.”

During parts July and August, when classes at Sapir were cancelled due to the war in Gaza, Rosenblum worked at a plastics factory in town. He said that, during work, if the siren rang, people would have 13 seconds to find the nearest bomb shelter—he said that by the time the red alert goes off, two seconds have already been shaved off from the 15.

When he is home during the siren, he said his two and three-year-old nephews and nieces panic amidst the rush to get to a shelter.

“Everyone is screaming. Everyone is crying,” Rosenblum said, adding glumly when asked about the current lull in fighting: “It’s very sad.”

Hesitant to offer his opinion on the war and on the government’s decision, for now, to halt its operation, Rosenblum instead offered some dark humor:

“[Russian President Vladimir] Putin asks God, ‘What do you think? When is it going to be the end of terrorism in Chechnya?”

“Not in your [presidential] term,” God said.

“[Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu asks God,” said Rosenblum. “‘What do you think? When is it going to be quiet in Gaza?’”

“God said, ‘Not in my term.’”

For Israelis in the western Negev, each day is ‘Russian Roulette’ Read More »