fbpx

July 31, 2014

Protesters threaten British cosmetics store that sells Israeli products

A cosmetics store in Manchester, England, that sells Israeli cosmetics has been victimized by callers threatening to kill the staff and burn down the store.

Local police are investigating the ongoing threats, the Jewish Chronicle reported. The store, called Kedem, has been the scene of daily anti-Israel protests since the start of Israel’s operation in Gaza.  Six anti-Israel protesters have been arrested.

Pro-Palestinian protesters also have posted threatening messages on the store’s Facebook page.

Meanwhile, also in Manchester, two 13-year-olds were charged this week with criminal damaging for vandalizing gravestones last month at a Jewish cemetery. The gravestones at the Rochdale Road cemetery were painted with swastikas and anti-Semitic graffiti, and about 40 were toppled.

Protesters threaten British cosmetics store that sells Israeli products Read More »

Israel and Hamas agree on 72-hour humanitarian Gaza cease-fire

Israel and Islamist militant group Hamas have agreed to a 72-hour ceasefire in their conflict in the Gaza Strip starting on Friday, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said on Thursday.

The ceasefire will begin at 8 a.m. local time (1.00 a.m. EDT) on Aug. 1, they said in a joint statement. The statement said “forces on the ground will remain in place” during the truce, implying that Israeli ground forces will not withdraw.

U.N. Middle East envoy Robert Serry has received assurances that all parties have agreed to the humanitarian ceasefire, the statement said.

“We urge all parties to act with restraint until this humanitarian ceasefire begins, and to fully abide by their commitments during the ceasefire,” Kerry and Ban said. “This ceasefire is critical to giving innocent civilians a much-needed reprieve from violence.”

Israeli and Palestinian delegations will immediately travel to Cairo for negotiations with the Egyptian government to reach a durable ceasefire, the statement said.

Israel launched its offensive on July 8 after Hamas rocket fire from Gaza intensified.

Gaza officials say 1,427 Palestinians, mostly civilians, have been killed and nearly 7,000 wounded. Fifty-six Israeli soldiers have been killed in Gaza clashes and some 400 wounded. Three civilians have been killed by Hamas shelling in Israel.

The United Nations said nearly a quarter of the 1.8 million Palestinians in the Mediterranean enclave had been displaced, with more than 220,000 seeking shelter in U.N. facilities. Eight U.N. employees have been killed in the conflict.

Reporting by Lesley Wroughton; Writing by Michelle Nichols; Editing by Sandra Maler

Israel and Hamas agree on 72-hour humanitarian Gaza cease-fire Read More »

NYT on why it hasn’t shown photos of Hamas fighters: We don’t have any

After my piece Thursday morning asking why mainstream media outlets aren’t showing photos of Hamas fighters in Gaza, The New York Times offered me this response: We don’t have any.

Of the 37 images that make up the Times’ most recent three slide shows of photos from the conflict, there’s not a single shot of a Hamas rocket launch (though more than 2,800 rockets have been fired at Israel) or of Hamas fighters using mosques, schools or hospitals as bases of operation.

Why not? After all, Hamas attacks against Israel are crucial to understanding what’s underpinning this conflict.

Here’s what Eileen Murphy, the Times’ vice president for corporate communications, says:

Our photo editor went through all of our pictures recently and out of many hundreds, she found 2 very distant poor quality images that were captioned Hamas fighters by our photographer on the ground.  It is very difficult to identify Hamas because they don’t have uniforms or any visible insignia; our photographer hasn’t even seen anyone carrying a gun.

I would add that we would not withhold photos of Hamas militants.  We eagerly pursue photographs from both sides of the conflict, but we are limited by what our photographers have access to.

Now, I’m no war reporter. It’s a risk I’m not willing to take, and I commend those who do. So I’m hesitant to question the work of reporters in Gaza right now.

But here’s what I don’t get: With the hundreds of journalists there, including numerous photojournalists with experience covering bloody conflicts in Syria, Ukraine, Iraq and Afghanistan, how is it that they aren’t able to get any images of Palestinians fighting the Israelis? We know these images exist — unless you believe the Israel Defense Forces is fabricating its footage of Palestinian fighters using ambulances to transport rockets, firing from hospitals and mosques, and launching rockets at Israel.

It’s certainly important to show the human and structural devastation in Gaza. But with more than 2,800 rockets fired at Israel thus far from Gaza, and plenty of other fighting there, you’d think media outlets would be able to document some of it. But they haven’t. (Israeli news outlets are barred from Gaza, so they get a pass.)

Maybe they’re not looking in the right places? By all accounts Hamas is running a command center out of the basement of Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza. How about showing us that? Three UNRWA schools so far have reported finding Hamas rockets on their grounds. How about showing us that?

Here’s what Times photographer Sergey Ponomarev, who is in Gaza, recently told the paper’s Lens Blog about his routine covering the conflict:

You leave early in the morning to see the houses destroyed the night before. Then you go to funerals, then to the hospital because more injured people arrive, and in the evening you go back to see more destroyed houses.
It was the same thing every day, just switching between Rafah and Khan Younis.

Maybe it’s time to switch it up a little?

NYT on why it hasn’t shown photos of Hamas fighters: We don’t have any Read More »

U.S. defends supplying Israel ammunition during Gaza conflict

The United States on Thursday called on Israel to do more to protect civilians in its military offensive in Gaza and condemned an Israeli strike on a U.N.-run school, even as it defended moves to resupply its close ally with ammunition.

The White House reiterated its position that it was Israel's right to defend itself and described the resupply of ammunition disclosed as the fighting raged this week as “routine.”

White House spokesman Josh Earnest rejected suggestions that resupplying the Israelis might prolong the conflict, saying it was “part of a routine foreign military sales delivery.”

“The requested items were readily available and were provided as they have been on numerous other occasions,” Earnest said.

The U.S. officials spoke shortly before the United States and the United Nations jointly announced a 72-hour ceasefire and an agreement for Israeli and Palestinian delegations to meet in Cairo to seek a “durable ceasefire.”

Gaza officials say more than 1,410 Palestinians, most of them civilians, have been killed in the enclave. Israel says 56 of its soldiers and three civilians have been killed.

Pentagon spokesman Colonel Steve Warren denounced the mounting death toll, saying: “The civilian casualties in Gaza have been too high.”

“And it's become clear that the Israelis need to do more to live up to their very high standards – their very high and very public standards – for protecting civilian life,” Warren said.

Earlier on Thursday, the top U.N. human rights official criticized the United States, Israel's main ally, for failing to sufficiently use its influence with Israel to halt the carnage.

The White House's Earnest used strong language to condemn the shelling of a U.N.-run school in Gaza. The United Nations said its initial assessment was that Israeli artillery shells hit the facility.

“The shelling of a U.N. facility that is housing innocent civilians who are fleeing violence is totally unacceptable and totally indefensible,” Earnest said.

The Pentagon has said it allowed Israel to tap a U.S. stockpile inside Israel to restock two different types of ammunition.

It described the munitions on Thursday as 120 mm tank rounds and 40 mm illumination rounds, fired from grenade launchers. A U.S. defense official had offered a different description of the ammunition on Wednesday, saying they were grenades and mortar rounds.

The Pentagon said it was unclear if the munitions would be used for training or operations.

The munitions were part of a program managed by the U.S. military and called War Reserves Stock Allies-Israel (WRSA-I), which stores munitions locally for U.S. use that Israel can also access in emergency situations.

Although Israel did not cite an emergency situation, the United States decided to draw some munitions from the stockpile anyway to rotate out older arms. “This is simply a rotating (of) munitions out of the stockpile in order to get newer munitions placed in there,” Warren said.

Reporting by Phil Stewart; Additional reporting by Eric Beech; Editing by David Storey, Bernard Orr

U.S. defends supplying Israel ammunition during Gaza conflict Read More »

Kerry sees ‘opportunity’ in Gaza ceasefire, urges search for common ground

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Friday called the 72-hour ceasefire agreed to by Israel and Hamas in their conflict in the Gaza Strip a “lull of opportunity” and said it was imperative that the sides make their best efforts to find common ground.

Kerry said Egypt's foreign minister will invite the Gaza ceasefire parties to take part in “serious” negotiations in Cairo and that the United States plans to send a small delegation to the talks.

“This is a lull of opportunity,” Kerry told reporters. “… It is imperative people make the best effort to try to find common ground.”

Reporting by David Brunnstrom; Writing by Will Dunham; Editing by Jim Loney

Kerry sees ‘opportunity’ in Gaza ceasefire, urges search for common ground Read More »

Hamas says will abide by three-day Gaza truce to begin on Friday

Hamas, the dominant militant group in the Gaza Strip, said it would abide by a three-day mutual ceasefire with Israel to begin early on Friday.

“Acknowledging a call by the United Nations and in consideration of the situation of our people, resistance factions agreed to a 72-hour humanitarian and mutual calm that begins at 8 a.m (1.00 a.m. EDT) on Friday as long as the other side abides by it,” Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri told Reuters.

“All the Palestinian factions are united behind the issue in this regard,” Abu Zuhri said.

Reporting by Nidal al-Mughrabi, editing by G Crosse

Hamas says will abide by three-day Gaza truce to begin on Friday Read More »

L.A. community marks 30 days since burial of Gilad Shaar, Eyal Yifra and Naftali Fraenkel

Prayer, reflection, advocacy and song marked the shloshim – the 30-day mourning period – of kidnapped and murdered Israeli teenagers Gilad Shaar, Eyal Yifra and Naftali Fraenkel, when, on Wednesday night, Stand With Us, Temple of the Arts and the Israel Institute co-sponsored a free and open-to-the-public event in the deceased's memory that drew approximately 1,000 community members to the Saban Theatre.

Participants in the evening’s somber, two-hour program included Leehy Shaar, who offered up personal feelings about her late nephew, Gilad, and described the personalities of Fraenkel and Yifra. She highlighted their senses of humor, their interests and the tragedy of their deaths.

Additionally, Beth Jacob Congregation Senior Rabbi Kalman Topp read aloud a psalm in Hebrew and English, and musician Sam Glaser offered up musical performances that conjured the sadness of the deaths and the hope for a better future in Israel. He closed the evening with a rendition of Oseh Shalom.

30 days have passed since Shaar, Yifra and Fraenkel’s funeral took place in Israel on July 1, one day after Israeli authorities discovered their dead bodies in the West Bank.

During the 18-day search for the boys, who were yeshiva students who went missing on June 12 after hitch-hiking at a bus stop in the West Bank, Los Angeles took notice. An event at Pan Pacific Park in mid-June gathered the community around the hope that the boys were alive. 

And, following the shocking news of their death, 1,500 people turned out to Beth Jacob Congregation for a memorial service.

Israel blamed Hamas for the murders of the three boys.

Meanwhile, for the pro-Israel international community, the teens' horrifying fate has become symbolic of the ruthlessness of Hamas, an organization that has called for Israel’s destruction and that controls Gaza.

Their death also, in part, prompted Israel’s current military operation in Gaza, Operation Protective Edge. More than 1,000 Palestinian civilians and more than 50 Israeli soldiers have died.

On Thursday afternoon, the two sides entered into a 72-hour ceasefire.

On Wednesday, the audience at the Saban stood up from their seats during a video presentation honoring all 56 IDF soldiers who have been killed in battle as of July 30. A fourth candle was added to a table alongside the three candles for Shaar, Fraenkel and Yifra, in remembrance of the dozens of deceased Israeli soldiers.

The evening offered more than remembrance. Several speakers, including Israel Consul General in Los Angeles David Siegel, Simon Wiesenthal Center leader Marvin Hier and Stand With Us CEO Roz Rothstein, spoke about what Israel is up against in its current war with Gaza.

Gaza has launched “nearly 3,000 rockets since the kidnapping [of the three boys],” Siegel said. “This country wouldn’t allow one.”

On August 12, the Saban hosts a memorial service for Los Angeleno and fallen IDF soldier Max Steinberg.

L.A. community marks 30 days since burial of Gilad Shaar, Eyal Yifra and Naftali Fraenkel Read More »

When Israel is at war in Gaza, Hollywood’s silence is golden

Many Hollywood celebrities and insiders have taken public stands on the Gaza War, with one glaring exception: Some of the biggest, most well-known supporters of Israel have been the least vocal.  Eager to support Israel in times of quiet, they prefer to keep a low profile when things heat up.

“If I didn’t work for a public company, I’d take to the megaphones,” one high-level, widely-known industry executive told me by phone–  on condition he not to be named.

Prominent entertainment industry leaders who have raised money for Israel and accepted awards from pro-Israel organizations in the past have not been heard from. In recent months, Barbra Streisand has issued statements on gay marriage, climate change and the death of Maya Angelou – but nothing about Gaza. And so far, nopublic comments have been made by industry leaders such as filmmaker Steven Spielberg, DreamWorks Animation CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg and NBCUniversal Vice Chairman, Ron Meyer.

“I have not checked on that at all,” Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center Museum of Tolerance said of the industry’s Jewish leaders, many of whom are major supporters of the museum. “I assume they’re caught up; some are overseas. I don’t know who’s in town. I haven’t spoken to any one of them.”

Still, Hier was quick to point out the up side of the hush.

“You’ll notice,” Hier said, “that none of big names are speaking harshly against Israel. I have not seen any of that. I suspect that if you look back to the ‘67 war” — also known as the Six Day War, when Israel’s neighbors Egypt, Jordan and Syria attacked and invaded – “I’m not sure you’ll find that everyone in the community weighed-in during those times, either. It’s the condition. It’s the way it is.”

Not that the quiet is universal.  Elsewhere in Hollywood, the Gaza War has sparked strong reactions.

Radio and TV Personality Howard Stern, Joan Rivers and Bill Maher have been outspoken supporters of Israel.   

“If New Jersey was lobbing rockets over into New York, there would be no Newark,” Rivers said during a July 28 appearance on Howard Stern’s radio show. When TMZ caught up with the comedian outside Los Angeles International Airport, she launched into what many described as a rant, on the same point. “Let me just tell you,” Rivers said, “If New Jersey were firing rockets into New York, we would wipe them out. If we heard they were digging tunnels from New Jersey to New York, we would get rid of Jersey.”

On a recent episode of HBO’s “Real Time with Bill Maher,” the talk show host said, “I feel terrible for a Palestinian child who dies. But if it’s your father, your brother, your uncle who’s firing those rockets into Israel, whose fault is it really? Do you really expect the Israelis not to retaliate?”

“Stop firing rockets into Israel and perhaps they won’t annihilate you,” Maher said during an interview with the Jewish Journal during the last Gaza conflict in 2012.

And Stern seemed to be directly addressing the silence of his high-profile industry colleagues during his July 28 broadcast.  

“I don’t know why more prominent Hollywood people don’t speak out about what’s going on there,” he said on his SiriusXM radio show, The Howard Stern Show. “They’re all afraid.”

Well, not everyone is afraid. On the other side, actors Penelope Cruz and Javier Bardem were joined by Spanish filmmaking icon Pedro Almodovar and hundreds of other Spanish artists in signing a letter accusing Israel of “genocide.”

Israel “humiliates, detains, and tramples on the rights of the Palestinian population in all of the West Bank every day, also causing many deaths,” the letter said, referring to the Israel Defense Forces as the “Israel Occupation Forces.”

Bardem and Cruz have since softened their statements, saying they abhor violence on all sides. 

“I’m not an expert on the situation,” Cruz wrote in a statement clarifying her position. “I’m aware of the complexity of [the conflict]. My only wish and intention in signing that group letter is the hope that there will be peace in both Israel and Gaza.”

Earlier this week, the grassroots human rights organization Jewish Voice for Peace released a three-and-a-half-minute video in memory of Palestinian civilians who have been killed in the conflict. Participants included celebrities, artists and other activists – including writer Gloria Steinem, playwright Tony Kushner and actor Mandy Patinkin – who each held up signs with the names and ages of deceased Palestinian civilians. In three days, the video “#GAZANAMES” had been viewed more than 100,000 times.

Pink Floyd’s Roger Waters and Disney star Selena Gomez have also spoken out, placing all the blame on Israel.

“Where did she go to college?” Rivers asked a reporter about Gomez. “Ask her if she knows how to spell ‘Palestinian.’”

But for all the outspoken few, many more—on both sides of the debate—have chosen to stay mum.

An article in The Hollywood Reporter last week suggested that in an industry with many pro-Israel supporters, holding an opinion critical of Israel could hurt a person’s career.

“Rule No. 1,” THR declared in a July 23 headline, “Talk about anything political in Hollywood…. Except Gaza.”

That claim prompted numerous online comments that repeated age-old anti-Semitic slurs about “Jewish control.”

“If you speak out on this issue as an American businessman you will be quietly blacklisted,” a commenter who identified himself only as “American Businessman” wrote. “Especially if you work in Hollywood. Everyone knows that, but going on record about it is career suicide. And there is nobody in America that will protect your career or rights when it comes to being blacklisted by the people that control the news, money, and business here.”

He added, “And my wife is Jewish.”

But in such a heated atmosphere, the reason for quiet, others say, is that the situation in Gaza is too complex for simple sound bites. And there are those, on both sides of the issue, who would rather stay silent than join the fulminations frenzy.

“The level of vitriol in the international criticism of Israel is at a higher pitch than ever,” Howard Gordon, creator of the Emmy-winning Showtime series “Homeland” said in an interview. “People’s carelessness with words is horrifying to me.”

In the discourse around Israel and Gaza, Gordon said he was especially disturbed by what he sees as “a reductive, sound-bite oriented assessment of a very complicated situation.”

“People just want to throw rocks and really don’t want to engage in a meaningful discussion,” he said.

“Everybody wants peace, everybody wants the violence to stop,” he added. “Any person with a conscience is mourning the tragic loss of life. But the direct accusation that Israel is trying to commit a genocide is really, really problematic. I don’t think anybody considers the … damage those [words] cause.”

The polarizing language may be reason enough for some of the industry’s prominent Israel supporters – many of whom are widely respected for their business leadership — to avoid exacerbating this latest war of words.

But Hier worries that reaction to this latest conflict has been more divisive and dangerous than any other in recent memory, and that supporters of Israel have a responsibility to speak out. “I feel very vulnerable,” Hier said, urging Hollywood friends of Israel to take a stand. “We’re in a time now where there’s a tremendous amount of hostility and false information going around and we could certainly use all hands on deck. Israel is being blamed for a war she did not start, a war she did not want, so every defender of Israel that can help at this moment should weigh in.”

The one exception to the reticence among entertainment industry high-rollers: Haim Saban.

The multi-billionaire mogul and political donor who is one of the country’s most outspoken Israel advocates said he is puzzled by the deafening silence of some of his friends and colleagues in the industry. “I don’t understand this myself,” Saban wrote in an email. “But starting today I will be working the phones to enlist the vocal support of people who I know have an interest in supporting our staunchest ally in the region — which also happens to be the only democracy in the region.”

“Watch my actions over the next couple of weeks,” Saban added, “because I personally don’t believe that this [will be] over soon, [and] I plan on working hard to enlist those who care but don’t know exactly what to do, and bring under the tent those that are removed from this crisis and from Israel.”

Asked if rising hostilities towards Israel have discouraged him at all from the idea of a two-state solution or the possibility of reconciliation, Saban said, “Not at all.”

“I am 100-percent for two states for two people,” he wrote. “But I am NOT for three states for two people with one of them being an Iranian proxy that rains rockets on Israel specifically targeting Israeli civilians.”

“Remember the famous Golda Meir quote,” Saban warned, paraphrasing the words of Israel’s first female Prime Minister: “We will forgive you for killing our children but we will never forgive you for forcing us to kill yours.”

When Israel is at war in Gaza, Hollywood’s silence is golden Read More »

Israeli man seriously injured in rocket strike

An Israeli man was seriously injured when a rocket landed in Kiryat Gat, located halfway between Tel Aviv and Beersheba.

The Iron Dome missile defense system intercepted three other rockets above Kiryat Gat and another rocket over Tel Aviv in a volley fired from Gaza on Wednesday evening.

The injured man, 30, was treated on the scene and then taken to the hospital in moderate to serious condition, according to Israel Police.

Also Wednesday afternoon, nine communities in the Eshkol region bordering Gaza had their electricity cut off when a rocket hit a power station serving the area.

Rockets were fired throughout the day Wednesday into southern Israel, including Sderot, Ashkelon and other communities near the border with Gaza.

Israeli man seriously injured in rocket strike Read More »

Do you have anyone better than Kerry?

If you read my long post on Obama and Kerry three days ago, you might find the following article a little odd. It is not – or at least I don't think it is. John Kerry can be very problematic (case in point: him calling PM Netanyahu a “stubborn head” – did he not understand this would be leaked? Or did he want it to be leaked?) but Israel should not make an enemy out of him. That was my message to Israelis when I wrote the following article in today's Maariv. Here is the translation:

The conversation between the American Secretary of State and the Israeli leader was very tense. In order to stop the fighting in Gaza, said the Secretary, you need to do “something positive” about the Arab League. “You asked for this help”, said the American. “I did not”, said the Israeli. The conversation was unpleasant, the American tone threatening. If there will not be a positive answer, it “could harm US-Israel relations”.

And no, this isn’t a description of a recent conversation between Benjamin Netanyahu and John Kerry; it’s a description of a conversation between Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni during operation ‘Cast Led’. The conversation is described in Tested by Zion, the book by Elliot Abrams, who was President Bush’s Deputy National Security Advisor at the time. Livni, writes Abrams, “was shocked by the threat”. She called Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to report on the conversation and figure out how to “protect US-Israel relations during the conflict”.

What can be learned from that conversation about the current tension between Washington and Jerusalem following Secretary Kerry’s miserable mediation efforts last week? First of all, that there’s nothing new under the sun. American Secretaries of State have a difficult time dealing with Arab sensitivities when Israel uses military force in Gaza. Secondly, that not every case of tension is a sign of the collapse of the relations and not every threat about how the relations will be hurt is realized. Thirdly – and Abrams states this explicitly in his book – not everything that’s written in the papers about the relations between governments is completely accurate. Livni and Rice’s relationship was described as “sweet” and “sisterly”; the reality was not always like that.

The case of Livni and Rice was a relatively easy one, mainly because Israel’s insistence had an attentive ear in President Bush’s Oval Office. In Kerry’s case, things are more complicated. Barack Obama, at least according to the official announcement, stood behind his Secretary of State. But what did he actually say to Netanyahu in the conversation between them? Judging by reports in newspapers and TV, it wasn't an easy conversation. But if we can judge by the events that have taken place since, it was a conversation which also had a degree of attentiveness to the Israeli position. Kerry was clearly and understandably offended by the insults he received following his ceasefire plan, but while he may still find a way to avenge them, his position as a mediator was improved.

He is an annoying Secretary of state and not a very good one. He also carries with him the negative baggage of a sense of failure for which he blames Israel. On the other hand, John Kerry is all there is at the moment. He, and Barack Obama, with all their flaws, are the great friend that Israel has to work with. And it’s true that their understanding of Israel’s needs is limited; that their instincts are off; that their impatience with Netanyahu’s government is unreasonable; and that their ability to craft a policy, explain it, and carry it out is not impressive. But, at least at the moment, Israel has no good substitute for the friendship and the support of the American administration. It cannot reach its goals without American assistance. In other words: if the relations with the Americans are a problem, it’s a sign that the Israeli policy which was based on them isn’t that great either and that it needs to be changed. On the other hand, if the relations aren’t a problem, we should treat the disputes, including the bitter ones, with proportion.

 

Do you have anyone better than Kerry? Read More »