fbpx

June 19, 2014

What Does Judaism Teach About the “Lone Gunman?”

What do we mean by ‘crazy’?  Is crazy the same as insane?  Is insane the same as mentally ill?  Can loneliness drive a person crazy?  Are “socially isolated” people mentally ill?


It terrifies me to read Elliot Rodger’s “> Nidal Malik Hasan, the first Fort Hood shooter, a terrorist if “> Las Vegas murderers who marked their kills with swastikas called ‘anti-government’ but not right wing extremists?


“>Golden Dawn party or the French people who support the What Does Judaism Teach About the “Lone Gunman?” Read More »

U.S. says 75 government scientists possibly exposed to anthrax

As many as 75 scientists working in U.S. federal government laboratories in Atlanta may have been exposed to live anthrax bacteria and are being offered treatment to prevent infection from the deadly organism, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Thursday.

The potential exposure occurred after researchers working in a high-level biosecurity laboratory at the agency's Atlanta campus failed to follow proper procedures to inactivate the bacteria. They then transferred the samples, which may have contained live bacteria, to lower-security CDC labs not equipped to handle live anthrax.

Two of the three labs conducted research that may have aerosolized the spores, the CDC said. Environmental sampling was done and the lab areas are closed until decontamination is complete.

Dr. Paul Meechan, director of the environmental health and safety compliance office at the CDC, said the agency discovered the potential exposure on June 13 and immediately began contacting individuals working in the labs who may have unknowingly handled live anthrax bacteria.

“No employee has shown any symptoms of anthrax illness,” Meechan told Reuters.

Meechan said the CDC is conducting an internal investigation to discover how the exposure occurred and said disciplinary measures would be taken if warranted.

“This should not have happened,” he said. For those exposed, he said, “We're taking care of it. We will not let our people be at risk.”

The normal incubation period for anthrax can take up to five to seven days, though there are documented cases of the illness occurring some 60 days after exposure, Meechan said.

As many as seven researchers may have come into direct contact with the live anthrax, he said. But the agency is casting as wide a net as possible to make sure all employees at the agency who may have walked into any of the labs at risk are being offered treatment.

Around 75 people are being offered a 60-day course of treatment with the antibiotic ciprofloxacin as well as an injection with an anthrax vaccine.

Meechan said it is too early to determine whether the transfer was accidental or intentional. He said that all employees who were doing procedures to inactivate the bacteria were working in a biosecurity laboratory and had passed a security check.

The CDC said in a statement it has reported the lab-safety incident to the Federal Select Agent Program, which oversees the use and transfer of biological agents and toxins that pose a severe threat to the public.

CDC spokesman Tom Skinner did not say whether the Federal Bureau of Investigation was investigating. The FBI was not immediately available to comment.

LAWMAKERS EXPRESS CONCERN

Henry Waxman, the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said he is “extremely concerned” but said “we understand CDC has taken swift action to respond to the possible exposure and will be investigating how this exposure occurred and appropriate measures to prevent such an event from happening in the future.”

Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious diseases expert at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, said the potential exposures are still “profoundly unfortunate and serious.”

“What's good about it is the exposures are minimal,” he said. CDC responded appropriately, aggressively and transparently. The risk to the individual is low and to the surrounding community, essentially nil.”

Schaffner said it is not yet clear exactly what the breach in infection control protocol was, but said, “Whatever it was, it should not have happened.”

Anthrax is a potentially deadly infectious disease caused by exposure to the bacterium Bacillus anthracis. The bacteria most commonly affect hoofed animals such as goats, but people can also become infected.

Infection can occur through a cut in the skin, breathing in anthrax spores or eating tainted meat.

Meechan said CDC workers in the lower-security labs were likely not wearing masks.

With anthrax, the biggest threat is inhalation anthrax, in which bacterial spores enter the lungs where they germinate before actually causing disease, a process that can take one to six days. Once they germinate, they release toxins that can cause internal bleeding, swelling and tissue death.

Inhalation anthrax occurs in two stages. In the first stage, symptoms resemble a cold or the flu. In the second stage, anthrax causes fever, severe shortness of breath and shock. About 90 percent of people with second-stage inhalation anthrax die, even after antibiotic treatment.

Reporting by Julie Steenhuysen in Chicago; Additional reporting by David Morgan in Washington; Editing by Michele Gershberg, Eric Walsh and Lisa Shumaker

U.S. says 75 government scientists possibly exposed to anthrax Read More »

Bring Back Our Boys

We send our prayers for the safety, health, courage, strength, and quick return home and to their families of three young Israeli teens, Gilad Shaar (age 16), Eyal Tifrach (age 19) and Naftali Frankel (age 16) who were kidnapped a week ago (all indications suggest by Hamas) in the Gush Etzion region of Israel.

May their captors free them. Na hashiveinu et bachureinu u-vaneinu habaita!

The following UTube expresses what is in the heart of the Jewish people and all peoples who cherish peace.

http://youtu.be/iWnEjwLGh6k

Bring Back Our Boys Read More »

After losing Ayelet, Galenas find joy with new baby, thanks to NIH breakthrough

Even before their daughter, Ayelet Galena, was diagnosed with a rare bone marrow disease called dyskeratosis congenita around her first birthday, parents Hindy Poupko and Seth Galena knew they wanted to have more children.

But once the diagnosis arrived, the couple had a dilemma: There was a fair chance their next child would have the life-threatening genetic disease, too.

Over the course of the next year or so, Galena and Poupko didn’t have much time to think about other kids. They were busy tending to Ayelet, whose struggle they decided to document on a blog, Eye on Ayelet. It quickly gained a following in the thousands. While her kidneys failed her, Ayelet became an Internet sensation. Galena dubbed the phenomenon Ayelet Nation.

When Ayelet died on Jan. 31, 2012, less than two months after her second birthday, thousands of people from around the world who had never met the little Orthodox Jewish girl from Manhattan’s Upper West Side seemed to share in her parents’ grief, overwhelming Poupko and Galena with condolence messages, food packages and gifts.

This month, good news finally arrived in the Galena-Poupko household: The couple had a new baby, a healthy boy born two weeks ago. On Sunday at his bris, they named him Akiva Max Galena.

The journey that led to their second child was no easy feat, as Poupko and Galena told JTA this week in an interview squeezed between feedings and diaper changes.

When Ayelet was diagnosed, she immediately was tested for the seven known genetic mutations that cause dyskeratosis congenita. But the results showed she didn’t have any of them, which meant her illness was caused by an unknown genetic mutation that could not be identified by prenatal screening.

“From that moment we always knew that having more children and confidently healthy children would be a challenge,” Poupko said. “They couldn’t even tell us if the disease was inherited or not.”

The couple had two options: They could get pregnant again and risk having another sick child who might suffer and die young, or they could wait for the science to catch up. If the genetic mutation that caused Ayelet’s disease could be identified, they could do in-vitro fertilization and test the embryos before implanting them in the uterus to make sure they didn’t carry the disease-causing gene.

The couple decided to wait.

“A lot of people would say lightning doesn’t strike twice, but this is a science,” Poupko said. “Statistically, we knew the likelihood of us having another child with the disease was 25 percent.”

They joined a National Institutes of Health study led by Dr. Sharon Savage of the National Cancer Institute to find the genetic causes for a number of inherited bone marrow diseases. The couple was told the process could take a few years, and by the end there would be only a 50-50 chance that the genetic mutation that caused Ayelet’s illness would be found.

While they were dealing with Ayelet’s tests, hospital stays and a bone-marrow transplant at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center — and eventually her tragic passing — researchers at the NIH were working on the genetics in consultation with scientists at the Rockefeller Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

With Poupko in her late 20s, the two figured they could afford to give the NIH study some time before trying for another baby.

“At that point we weren’t ready to roll the dice and take a chance,” Galena recalled. “I think in a strange way it was helpful, because it gave us the time to heal from Ayelet’s death. For both of us that was a good time for mourning Ayelet properly. It took me the full two years to really start thinking about things in a forward-thinking way.”

In the year after Ayelet’s death, Poupko and Galena grappled with their grief, worked on reconnecting with each other and immersed themselves in routine and adventure.

At work, Poupko was busy at the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York, fighting the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement against Israel and keeping up the campaign for public pressure to counter Iran’s nuclear program. Galena went back to work at VML, a digital marketing and advertising agency. After the massacre in Newtown, Conn., in December 2012, Galena and some colleagues built a tribute website, TacosforNoah.com, dedicated to the memory of the youngest Sandy Hook shooting victim, Jewish 6-year-old Noah Pozner.

When the 30-day mourning period following Ayelet’s death ended, Poupko and Galena went on a healing trip to Israel, and later they flew to Thailand on a trip Poupko describes as “awesome.”

As longtime pillars of the community of young Modern Orthodox Jews on the Upper West Side, they also leaned on their many friends and family members, whom Galena credits with helping the couple through the mourning process.

They always were eager for word of progress on the genetic front, but Poupko says they tried not to be consumed by it.

“I wasn’t crippled with anxiety,” Poupko said. “I felt like one way or another we would figure out a way to build a family together. I just didn’t know when or how.”

But waiting was not easy, and it was made more difficult by inquiries about why the couple wasn’t having more children.

“I’m not exactly a patient person. It was definitely a challenging time for our lives,” Poupko said. “We were very open about it even though it was painful. People who were close to us understood that we were waiting to safely have more children.”

Unlike with most NIH studies, in this one the researchers doing the genetic work were in direct contact with Galena and Poupko, who would call weekly for updates.

The good news finally came on April 11, 2013. Poupko remembers where and when she was when she got the call. After the NIH nurse on the phone told her that Ayelet’s genetic mutation had been found, Poupko broke down, sobbing.

“We had been following up, calling them nonstop, but they had never called us before,” she recalled. “It was amazing. We knew at that moment that we would have that future we’d always wanted.”

From there to getting pregnant was a relatively short road, but not an uncomplicated one. The couple went through a process called preimplantation genetic diagnosis, or PGD, in which the female’s egg and the male’s sperm are mixed in a laboratory to produce embryos. Those embryos were then tested for the mutant gene. The healthy ones were implanted via IVF. Late last year, Poupko, now 30, got pregnant.

In his bris speech, Galena offered a special thanks to the NIH, “who told us to give them five to 10 years to find the genetic mutation” but found it in less than two.

Now that they have a new baby, Poupko says she wants to help spread the message within the Jewish community about the importance of genetic testing — particularly in the haredi Orthodox community. Haredi couples whose genetic screenings show both members are carriers for certain genetic diseases often are told to break up, but Poupko says new genetic research makes it possible for such couples to produce healthy babies.

“Modern medicine gives people options they never thought possible,” Poupko says, citing her own experience of being able to screen out problematic embryos before their implantation. “The Jewish community needs to be educated on this. Ashkenazi Jews in particular need to be up to date and knowledgeable.”

She recommended JScreen as one useful resource for genetic testing for Ashkenazi Jews.

Galena says the experience of the recent pregnancy and birth was an emotional roller coaster.

“Even when we found out we were pregnant it was still a bittersweet process,” Galena said. “The thought of being parents again opened up more wounds for us about mourning Ayelet.”

With the new baby boy now at home, his big sister doesn’t feel far away, Galena said.

“A lot of having a new child is thinking about the old one, so Ayelet’s definitely on our minds at all times,” he said. “Akiva should know what a great older sister he had.”

After losing Ayelet, Galenas find joy with new baby, thanks to NIH breakthrough Read More »

Considering future, Claims Conference weighs shutting down vs. Holocaust education

A special panel tasked with examining the governance and strategic vision of the Claims Conference is recommending that the organization shift its long-term focus to Holocaust education and remembrance, JTA has learned.

The panel was appointed last year following a scandal involving the Claims Conference’s failure to detect a $57 million fraud scheme there that persisted until 2009. It also recommended cutting in half the size of the board’s executive committee and the number of special board committees.

The special panel did not, however, recommend any changes to the composition of the Claims Conference’s board, which critics have complained is unrepresentative because it does not include enough Israeli or survivor groups and includes too many once-robust Jewish organizations that are quite small today.

The new recommendations, outlined in two hefty documents sent to Claims Conference board members last week and this week and obtained by JTA, will go to a vote when the board holds its annual meeting in New York on July 8.

Consisting of board members and outside experts and guided by Accenture consultants, the special panel was charged with reviewing the administration, management and governance structure of the Claims Conference, which obtains Holocaust restitution and compensation from Germany and Austria. The central question the panel examined was what the Claims Conference should do after the last of the survivors dies.

Three possible courses of action were given serious consideration: shutting down; funding education and remembrance projects; or shifting its focus to general Jewish educational programming, helping victims of other genocides obtain restitution or preserving Jewish cultural sites in the former Soviet Union.

Given the Claims Conference’s successes at convincing Germany to increase its funding for survivors, the panel concluded that “to close down without attempting to leverage its position and significant experience in the service of Holocaust education and remembrance would be to miss a major opportunity.”

In an interview with JTA, the Claims Conference’s chief executive, Greg Schneider, emphasized that Holocaust education isn’t new to the Claims Conference: The organization currently funds education and remembrance to the tune of $18 million per year with money obtained from the sale of unclaimed Jewish properties in the former East Germany.

“The Claims Conference has always dealt with the consequences of the Shoah,” Schneider said of the board’s mandate for the organization. “When that meant direct payments to survivors, we did that. When that meant rebuilding communities, we did that. When that meant home care [for elderly survivors], we did that. Educating people about the Shoah and confronting Holocaust denial all deal with consequences of the Shoah. To be faithful to our mandate, we should continue to do that. And we are uniquely qualified to do so.”

The new vision for the Claims Conference hinges on the organization’s ability to get material support for it from the perpetrators of the Holocaust — namely Germany, but also Austria and companies complicit in the Nazi genocide. If that funding cannot be secured, the Claims Conference should go out of business once there are no survivors left, Schneider said.

“If we’re unable to get money from perpetrator governments, and the survivors have all died, we should close down,” he said. “We should not try to reinvent ourselves into something else.”

Stuart Eizenstat, a lead Claims Conference negotiator and special assistant to Secretary of State John Kerry on Holocaust issues, said he’s optimistic about getting Germany to support the proposed new focus, noting that the country already does so through mandatory Holocaust education in German schools.

“There’s every reason to think that they would be supportive of this,” Eizenstat said. “After all the survivors are gone this is the right thing to do.”

Though survivors are dying, their overall need for aid actually is rising because of their growing infirmity and relative poverty. The Claims Conference estimates that survivor needs will peak in about two or three years, followed by a progressive decline.

Globally there are an estimated 500,000 living Nazi victims — a category that includes not just survivors of concentration camps, ghettos and slave labor camps but also those forced to flee the Nazi onslaught, compelled to go into hiding or who endured certain others forms of persecution. About half are expected to die in the next seven or eight years, according to a new demographic assessment that was part of the special panel’s work, and survivors of some kind or another are expected to be around for another 20-25 years.

The debate about what to do about the Claims Conference once the last of the survivors dies is not new. Established in 1951 to secure compensation and restitution from Germany, the Claims Conference has negotiated successfully for an estimated $70 billion for survivors and survivor needs over the course of its existence.

Most of that money has come directly from Germany in the form of pensions and compensation payments, with the Claims Conference acting only as the processor of payments and verifier of claims (this latter area is where the $57 million fraud occurred). As each survivor dies, these payments cease.

The Claims Conference also has a bucket of discretionary funding: billions generated from the sale of heirless Jewish property from the former East Germany. But that bucket, known as the Successor Organization, is expected to run dry by 2020 at its current annual allocation rate of about $118 million to groups that aid survivors and $18 million to Holocaust education and remembrance.

In 2004, the Claims Conference managed to get Germany to begin to fund a new area: home care for survivors, including food, transportation and medical care. Berlin has steadily increased the amount of money it provides the program, from $42 million in 2009 to $190 million in 2013. Last year Germany agreed to another $800 million in funding through 2017.

If the Claims Conference board adopts the new plan next month, the question for Claims Conference negotiators is whether they’ll be able to get Germany to move into another new area — one that, unlike aid to aging survivors, has no particular expiration date.

“I believe the good will is there,” said Julius Berman, the Claims Conference’s chairman. “Their issue is more in terms of budget rather than concept. If we do a correct job to explain the need, I think we’ll have a receptive audience on the other side.”

The mandate for reexamining the Claims Conference’s future and governance grew out of a public storm a year ago over the discovery that the organization had conducted two investigations in 2001 into questionable conduct that failed to uncover a massive fraud scheme being perpetrated by a senior Claims Conference official. The fraud continued unabated until Claims Conference leaders discovered it in late 2009. In all, 31 people pleaded guilty or were found guilty in connection with the scheme, which resulted in $57 million in illegitimate payouts by Germany.

A Claims Conference probe last year into the bungled 2001 investigations proved highly controversial when it was disavowed by two of its four committee members and then rebutted in a 21-page missive by Schneider. In the end, the Claims Conference board elected to end its reexamination of the 2001 episode and rebuffed proposals to open up to any additional outside oversight.

The committees that oversaw this most recent Claims Conference reexamination process were, however, led by outsiders. The strategic vision committee was chaired by Jeffrey Solomon, president of the Charles and Andrea Bronfman Philanthropies, and the governance committee was chaired by Michael Miller, CEO of the Jewish Community Relations Council of New York. The committees themselves included outsiders as well as Claims Conference board members.

 

Considering future, Claims Conference weighs shutting down vs. Holocaust education Read More »

The end of an era

When I first came to Friday Night Live
I didn’t know if I’d ever been in a Jewish room so big.

It was like they took the entire outside, put up walls on the very edges,
added comfortable seating and painted the sky to look like a ceiling.

I remember the sign I saw before I entered.
“No Cell Phones.”

I wasn’t sure if it was a statement against their existence,
as if cell phones somehow represented hatred of Jews,

or if I just wasn’t allowed to bring one into the room.
In either case it was nineteen something or other and back then

I couldn’t afford to make a local toll call let alone own a cell phone.
So I confidently walked into the room knowing it wouldn’t be a problem.

I remember the rabbi. I’d known his wisdom from years before
when he stood in front of a room full of eager undergraduates and

wrote the entire first paragraph of the book “Lolita” on the board from memory
just to make a point about how people remember things.

I’ll be lucky if I remember how to get home tonight … but I remember that.
This was a rabbi I wanted to learn more from.

I remember the singer. A man with such incredible spontaneity
his band told him you never do the same thing once.

A man whose simple melodies you fell in love with the first time you heard them.
A man who, if you happen to be in the room, might, with no forewarning,

pull you up out of the congregation and demand you tell your life story.
Be careful when you walk into this room,

because when you do you become a part of its story.
Your voices, not acceptable when too quiet, become the choir.

We are the holy cabal. And this too must pass.
The baton at least. On to the next.

The old will become new and everything remains holy
if you’re willing to look close enough.

The impact has been made.
What happens in this room has been scientifically duplicated

in rooms of all sizes all over the world.
This has been the litmus test and we have passed.

The rabbi, the singer, will be missed
but their voices and words not forgotten.

And in a hundred thousand years, when the archaeologists of the future
are dusting off the remains of West Los Angeles,

a small crack in the rubble will open up
and a trapped melody will force its way into their ears.

ah na na na na na na …

They’ll smile, and nod to each other because
this has always been one of their favorites.

That is the endurance of this.
We are but borrowing this dust from the earth.

We will inevitably exchange it for our wristband
to the next big after-party in the sky.

(And you don’t even have to be ages 21 to 39 to get in.)
But how we filled this space remains.

The music never silenced.
The wisdom perpetual.

Friday Night Live.
The story goes on.

Los Angeles poet Rick Lupert read this poem on June 13, 2014 at Sinai Temple at the final Friday Night Live service led by Rabbi David Wolpe and Craig Taubman. Lupert's work can be found online at poetrysuperhighway.com/.

The end of an era Read More »

Investigative report skewers Yeshiva U. for past investment practices

The Jewish Channel, together with TakePart, has published an investigative report on Yeshiva University.

Headlined “How to Lose $1 Billion: Yeshiva University Blows its Future on Loser Hedge Funds,” the article notes that contrary to conventional wisdom, the Madoff Ponzi scheme was a relatively minor factor in the school’s current financial woes. The piece, written by The Jewish Channel’s Steven I. Weiss, says that the major factor was the diversion of the bulk of the university’s endowment dollars to risky hedge fund investments and a governance culture with inadequate conflict-of-interest policies constraining the school’s Wall Street board members.

Weiss, a former Y.U. student, wrote that the article was based on a “review of more than 10,000 pages of legal and financial documents, dozens of interviews, and many New York State Freedom of Information Law requests.”

Yeshiva University has issued the following response:

It’s unfortunate that Yeshiva University wasn’t given sufficient opportunity to react to the TakePart article, which is full of half-truths and inaccuracies from as far back as a decade ago. The writer, who admits that he has an axe to grind with YU, claims to have worked on the article for two years, but contacted YU less than two days before publication, presented limited information that he planned to report and ignored most of what he was provided. Given the poor quality of this article apparently written for no purpose other than to damage YU, we will remain focused on the future and have no further comment on this matter, other than to share that YU has invested in its core, our students and faculty, with great results, and will continue to do so. Today, YU’s investment portfolio is strong and professionally managed by our investment office with careful board oversight and best-in-class conflict of interest policies in place.

Weiss’ response to the response (via an email to JTA):

This article has already garnered praise from Pulitzer Prize winning business columnist Michael Hiltzik of the Los Angeles Times, John Carney of the Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg’s Barry Ritholtz, and many others. All key claims within it are based entirely on Yeshiva’s own financial documents, its internal communications, and the sworn testimony of board members and employees past and present, obtained by TakePart in association with The Jewish Channel as part of a two-year investigation.

JTA’s request to Y.U. about the statement –  asking that officials identify the specific “half-truths and inaccuracies” and share details about its investment portfolio — has not yet been answered.

Investigative report skewers Yeshiva U. for past investment practices Read More »

Flavor versus Taste

I recently attended a talk at UCLA about our perception of food. At the entrance we were all given little bags of jelly beans of different flavors for what ended up being an fascinating demonstration.  The speaker discussed the five basic tastes we feel on our tongue – salty, sweet, sour, bitter, and umami (savory).  Other “tastes” that we feel on our tongue are heat (e.g. from cayenne pepper) or coolness (e.g., mint), but technically these are through a different mechanism called chemesthesis, and are felt our tongue, and to a lesser degree also on any skin surface.  “Flavor”, on the other hand, is a result of the scent of the food.  Following this explanation there came a demonstration:

We were asked to pinch our nose shut with our fingers, to put one of the jelly beans in our mouth and to chew on it.  Uniformly, what we felt was that the jelly bean was sweet, but not much more.  We were then asked to let go of our nose, so air could go through and we could feel the scent.  Suddenly the flavor of the jelly bean – coconut, strawberry, licorice – came alive.   And it came alive in our mouth, not in our nose.  What had been just sweet suddenly had a flavor.  This is an easy experiment to try for yourself, and it’s amazing.

In cooking, salt, sugar, acid (vinegar or lemon juice), and spiciness are known as flavor enhancers.  That is, they don’t actually create the flavor, they simply enhance it.  So a dish without salt or sugar is perceived as being bland, even if it is well flavored. As the speaker was talking, the explanation for these characteristics suddenly became clear in my mind.  When our tongue feels the taste of saltiness, sweetness, sourness, or heat of a dish, the scent is accentuated, and we perceive flavor.  So the real differentiator, the thing that makes one dish taste different from the other, is its scent. 

Another surprising point the speaker made was that while the perception of taste is innate, the perception of flavor is learned.  We’re born with a certain perception of the five basic tastes, and that perception is not fundamentally altered over our lifetime.  But our perception of different flavors is.  The prime example, one which almost everyone has experienced at some point, is of eating something, and afterwards being very ill.  Whether or not there was a relation between that flavor and the illness, we associate the two, and reject the flavor.  I had this experience with gnocchi when I was 11 years old.  I ate gnocchi in the evening, then was violently ill all night. It turned out that a stomach virus had been circulating, but for years, until my 30’s, seeing, smelling, or even thinking of gnocchi, made me feel ill.  Conversely, most of us develop an affinity for flavors that we grew up with.  Those affinities and preferences are learned.  I have a particular love of Mediterranean food, particularly of the Lebanese, Syrian, and North African variety, and I realize that this love is not something I was born with, but rather something that I developed during a childhood experiencing these flavors.

A final interesting factoid:  The speaker mentioned, as I’d heard before, that it’s believed that bitterness is one of the five basic tastes because it’s a strong indicator of danger – bitterness is often associated with poisons.  So our innate ability to perceive bitterness is protective.  But interestingly, for most of us, a little bit of bitterness makes food more interesting.  Hence many drinks are enhanced by some bitterness, and the same is true of food.  One of the attractions of eggplant (at least for eggplant lovers like myself), is its slight bitterness.  Perhaps in the same way that we enjoy the thrill of (mild) danger – a roller coaster ride, surfing, driving fast – we also enjoy a little bit of bitterness.  Danger is exciting.

Flavor versus Taste Read More »