fbpx

February 5, 2014

Why I love AIPAC

It’s one of the odd quirks of history that Israel’s No. 1 diplomatic enemy — the United Nations — is located not far from Israel’s best friend, the United States Congress. These two bodies are arguably the most influential political entities in the world.

This has the makings of a perverse Hollywood script. Right in the middle of the informal Jewish capital of the world, New York City, a global parliament continuously condemns the Jewish state, while an hour away in Washington, D.C., the world’s most powerful parliament continuously defends it.

“Israel is the U.N.’s punching bag,” my friend Uri Dromi wrote last week after participating in a conference in New York. “From the infamous ‘Zionism is Racism’ resolution of 1975, to the Goldstone Report of 2009 (which was overwhelmingly slammed by the U.S. Congress), the U.N. organization seemed to be obsessed with blaming and censuring one country only: Israel.

“During the 2006-2007 session of the General Assembly, for example, it was busy passing 22 resolutions condemning Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East, while not even bothering to criticize Sudan for the Darfur genocide.”

It’s mind-boggling that in 2013, according to UN Watch, the U.N. General Assembly adopted 21 resolutions condemning Israel– and only four for the rest of the world. 

So, just as I’m repulsed by this blatant and immoral discrimination against Israel, I am immeasurably grateful for the U.S. Congress’ support of the Jewish state.

This support is unparalleled in the annals of Jewish history. Take a look at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress in 2011. He got 29 standing ovations from Republicans and Democrats alike. Members of Congress may have been at one another’s throats on things like Obamacare and the budget, but on Israel, they all stood as one. That’s just short of a miracle.

When I see the growth of anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism around the world, I shudder to think where Israel would be without the undying support of the U.S. Congress.

That’s why it was so dismaying to see 150 Jews last week release an open letter attacking New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio for expressing his enthusiasm for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)– a group that, over the years, has done more than any other to rally support for Israel in the U.S. Congress.

At a private gala, de Blasio had the nerve to say things like, “City Hall will always be open to AIPAC. When you need me to stand by you in Washington or elsewhere, I will answer the call, and I’ll answer it happily ‘cause that’s my job.”

De Blasio’s remarks evidently riled up the anti-AIPAC liberal crowd, because, as they wrote in their open letter, “AIPAC speaks for Israel’s hardline government and its right-wing supporters, and for them alone. It does not speak for us.”

Seriously, this is not only rich, it's narcissistic chutzpah of the highest order. AIPAC, by definition, respects the democratic wishes of Israeli voters. It would respect the policy of any Israeli government in power. 

AIPAC conferences are full of supporters, including many liberals, who might disagree with certain Israeli policies but who show up because they understand something bigger: Israel is under unrelenting attack from its enemies and needs all the support it can get. And nobody can provide that support — from military security to global diplomacy — like the U.S. Congress.

It’s astounding that these same Jews who attack AIPAC rarely, if ever, release open letters to defend Israel's honor or castigate groups like the United Nations, who routinely discriminate against the Jewish state.

Where was their letter of outrage last month when UNESCO tried to abruptly cancel the landmark exhibit, “The 3,500 Year Relationship of the Jewish People and the Land of Israel,” because of pressure from Israel’s enemies? 

For the liberal Jews who blasted AIPAC for “not speaking for us,” the real enemy, it seems, is not those who insult Israel or aim to destroy her, but Jewish groups whose policies or politics they abhor.

It’s funny how this liberal group didn’t publish any letters against AIPAC when the latter gamely agreed to help President Obama get congressional support for controversial military action in Syria. But now that AIPAC has decided not to parrot the White House line on Iran, well, it’s time to take out the knives.

And these days, apparently it’s not enough to have your own opinion and express it. To show you really mean business, you have to get 150 co-signers and gang up on the unsuspecting target with a public letter.

Frankly, it’s beyond me how Jews who say they love Israel feel compelled to publicly rebuke a New York mayor for…for what? For supporting a group that has done the most to build a bond between Israel and the world’s most powerful political entity.

If Israel lovers in New York City really feel like ganging up on a target, they ought to look not toward City Hall, but a few miles away at the hypocritical Israel-haters at the United Nations.

Disagreeing with Israeli policies doesn’t preclude defending Israel.

I may not agree with everything the Israeli government does, or with everything AIPAC does. But I’m aware of the bigger picture: Regardless of what it does, Israel is surrounded by enemies who want to destroy and undermine her, and the U.S. Congress is our most important ally to help Israel survive in a hostile world.

Policies come and policies go, but the need to defend Israel only grows.

That’s why I love AIPAC.

 

David Suissa is president of TRIBE Media Corp./Jewish Journal and can be reached at davids@jewishjournal.com.

Why I love AIPAC Read More »

Standing naked: Parashat Tetzaveh (Exodus 27:20-30:10)

You step out of the shower, towel off and stand before the mirror. It’s just you and your reflection … the naked truth. Your eye appraises without mercy. Under the bright lights, no imperfection can be concealed; no blemish disguised. Or …

It’s the morning after. Lights once dimmed now illuminate the room. In the light, there are no secrets. You bare yourself before your lover. Masks removed, the “physical you” awaits your lover’s judgment.

In these moments, we tremble. This is as vulnerable as it gets. Standing naked before the unforgiving eye, we worry about the verdict we know is coming. Anxiously we wonder: Am I enough or am I too much? Will he/she/I accept the unclothed me, or will I be rejected? Do I have a future with him/her/myself, or will I face the future hiding who I really am?

Clothing dresses us up but hides the naked truth beneath

In this week’s parasha, Tetzaveh, Aaron, the Israelite Kohen Gadol (high priest), gets a stylish new set of clothing. Using only the best materials and colors available to the wilderness-dwelling Israelite community, the new priestly clothes ensure that Aaron appears strikingly handsome and powerful as he stands before the gathered Israelites. Having recently escaped from the drab drudgery of Egyptian servitude, the Israelite seamstresses now create a set of garments that arouse yirah and kavod (awe and respect). From this point forward, Israelite religion and its religious leadership present an image eliciting pride, pageantry and a sense of perfection.

Compared to the intricate design of Aaron’s Kohen costume, the regular Israelites are relatively naked. Sure, they have their own frocks, and some might even wear ones with some color and style, but in stark contrast to the Kohen Gadol, most Israelites are plain. Where Aaron dresses up for the Most High, the Israelites stand exposed before the Most Intimate One.

This is as it should be, because while clothing dresses us up, it only covers up the reality beneath.

Why detail Aaron’s divine duds?

Perhaps the detailed specifications and intricate design in Torah about Aaron’s clothing are designed with an ironic aspiration. Perhaps Torah wants to expose regular people — you and me — to reality: that even the fanciest clothing and impeccably matched accessories fail to dress up the most important part of ourselves. 

Every day, as we stand naked, exposed, we are forced to face reality. We need to figure out how to love our bodies, our souls and ourselves.

After the morning after

Some of us start the day worrying about which outfit to wear. Our time is better spent wondering how we will be received when we strip off our outer garments and stand before others. Without the clothing to conceal our faults and blemishes, we await our lover’s response and our own self-assessment. Am I enough or too much? Am I worthy? How must I change? Is there a future or …

We would do well to consider: Am I anxious about the verdict? Not happy with what I see? Plastic surgery cannot help here. Rather than cutting the skin, we need to reshape our soul. Instead of altering our physical shape, we do well to adjust aspects of our behavior and repair our relationships.

After the showers and the mornings after — in fact, at each moment of every day — we face a judging yet forgiving eye. We stand before the Holy One, who sees all and knows all. It is time to clothe ourselves in holy living.

Rabbi Amy Scheinerman of Baltimore,  taught me recently the words of Malbim (Meir Leibush ben Yehiel Michel Wisser, 1809-1879). Malbim reflects upon the detailed instructions given for building the Mishkan (the Tabernacle in the wilderness) and uses them to guide us toward the inner work we each need to do. Sensing Torah’s desire to paint the Mishkan as more than a repository for sacrifices, Malbim understands Parshat Terumah to teach us to build a Mishkan within: “Each one of us needs to build a Tabernacle for God in the recesses of our hearts, by preparing oneself to become a Sanctuary for God and a place for the dwelling of God’s glory.”

Clothes cover up the blemishes but holy living removes the anxiety of the nakedness we all bear. So even as you keep your clothes on, take a good look at your naked inner self. It is time to bare your soul and uncover the holiness and beauty within.

Standing naked: Parashat Tetzaveh (Exodus 27:20-30:10) Read More »

What does it mean to be a pro-Israel politician?

As we head into this critical election year, it’s worth pausing for a moment as we begin to assess the candidates to ask ourselves a fundamental question: what makes a politician pro-Israel?

Too many candidates are happy to play the game the way they think we want them to play it. They check the AIPAC website on their smart phone on the way to the local synagogue and then memorize a few key talking points before they get out of the car. Then they praise the unique U.S.-Israel relationship, promise to move the embassy, and say vaguely menacing things about Hamas and Hezbollah. And then they’re gone, at least until they’re up for re-election.

It’s time we set a higher bar for what “pro-Israel” really means. Should it include support for sanctions against Iran? Military engagement in Syria? A detailed description of the boundaries of a two-state solution? It’s time we asked the more difficult and more specific follow-up questions, not to establish absolute litmus tests but to better understand how the men and women who want to represent us define their relationship with the Jewish community and homeland.

The ongoing struggle to achieve peace in the Middle East takes place on many fronts.  It happens every day in Tel Aviv and in Jerusalem, in Gaza and on the West Bank, in Washington and New York and Geneva.  But that struggle takes place much closer to home as well. Threats to Israel’s safety and security emerge regularly in Berkeley and in Riverside, in Davis and in Irvine and in Westwood. And this is the arena in which our state political leaders can make a real difference.

On college campuses across California, the fight for Israel’s future has opened on a new front, forcing Jewish students and their allies to defend thinly veiled attacks that are anti-Zionist at best and anti-Semitic at worst. An international propaganda campaign works to deceive our next generation of leaders by pressuring them to support a morally inexcusable boycott against Israel and calling on university officials to withdraw their investments from companies that operate in West Bank territory.

The proponents of the so-called Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement have based their campaign on a fundamentally inaccurate premise. They assert that Israel discriminates against its Arab citizens, a peculiar charge against a nation that includes Arabs in its Cabinet, Supreme Court, Knesset, civil service and defense forces and whose robust free press, freedom of speech, freedom of religion and human rights protections are virtually unique in the Middle East. Meanwhile, BDS leaders ignore horrendous civil and human rights violations in neighboring countries such as Syria, Iran, and Egypt, leading to the unavoidable conclusion that in their eyes, Israel’s transgression is not one of conduct but rather crimes of religion, heritage and existence.

Israel’s assailants know that the chances that California universities will divest their holdings are negligible. Their own materials (http://www.bdsmovement.net/files/2011/02/divestguide.pdf) make it clear that their objectives have less to do with policy than with propaganda. But BDS leaders understand that college campuses are an ideal environment in which to spread untruths about Israel and have adeptly used the debate over divestiture as a platform from which to mislead young Californians and attempt to turn them against a Jewish state.

In a battle for public opinion such as this, it becomes critically important for the state’s politicians to commit themselves to speak out – forcefully and regularly. Our political leaders must stand with the brave young men and women who defend Israel’s right to exist against an ongoing onslaught.

I will take that stand. I am currently running for the office of California Secretary of State, as an independent No Party Preference candidate who believes that California’s chief elections officer should not be a member of either political party. I believe that we can restore sanity to an out-of-control campaign fundraising arms race, expand voting opportunities and civics education and begin to rebuild the state’s political center. (www.4schnur.com)

But long before I was a candidate, I was a Jew. So I believe even more strongly in the safety and security of the state of Israel. I believe that the BDS movement represents a potentially catastrophic threat to peace in the Middle East. If elected, I will commit myself to protecting the rights and safety of Jewish and other pro-Israel students from the invective and hate speech that too often accompanies the divestiture argument. I will use the bully pulpit of a statewide office to bring public and media attention to the argument against BDS in order to ensure that their propaganda is met with accurate and truthful response.

That is the standard that I believe should exist for determining whether a candidate is a friend of Israel. I applaud the recent formation of the Jewish Legislative Caucus and promise to work with their members to develop a policy agenda that protects against the next rounds of divestiture efforts. I hope candidates of all partisan and ideological persuasions, for the office I seek and all others, will step up to meet this same standard. Our students – and our homeland – deserve no less.


Dan Schnur is on leave from his position as the director of the Jesse M. Unruh Institute of Politics at the University of Southern California, where he serves as the faculty advisor of SC Students for Israel.

What does it mean to be a pro-Israel politician? Read More »

For some West Bank CEOs, no lost sleep over boycott threat

Of the 200,000 wine bottles Yakov Burg produced last year, 16,000 went to Europe.

The possibility of a boycott and repeated rumblings that Europe is planning to label goods produced in the settlements could decrease that number, but Burg isn’t worried.

The CEO of Psagot Winery, which is located in a settlement of the same name in the hills of the central West Bank, Burg prides himself on running a Jewish-owned business in the West Bank, even welcoming groups of Christian Zionists who want to volunteer during the harvest.

The winery’s location, though, also makes it a prime target for boycotts aimed at goods produced in the settlements.

“There are a lot of places that won’t buy the wine, so of course there’s damage,” Burg told JTA. “It doesn’t scare me. We need to fight the boycott, not just do what they want.”

The effort to boycotts goods produced in the West Bank, long an objective of anti-Israel activists and some Jewish critics of the Israeli occupation, has achieved some notable victories in recent weeks.

Last month, PGGM, the largest Dutch pension fund, announced it was divesting from five Israeli banks because of their involvement in financing Israeli settlements. That was followed by an announcement that Denmark’s Danske Bank was blacklisting Israel’s Bank Hapoalim over its settlement activity. Sweden’s Nordea Bank has asked two other Israeli banks for more information about their activities in the settlements.

In the United States, settlement goods were in the news recently after actress Scarlett Johansson came under fire for representing SodaStream, an Israeli company that produces home soda machines at a factory in the West Bank.

And in Europe, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands already label goods made in the settlements, and the European Union has threatened repeatedly to take the labeling continent-wide. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry warned last week that Israel could face even greater boycott pressure if peace talks with the Palestinians collapse.

But several CEOs of companies that operate factories in the settlements acknowledged that while boycotts could hurt sales, they don’t yet represent a serious threat to business.

Yehuda Cohen, CEO of the plastics company Lipski, which has a factory in the northern West Bank Barkan industrial park, says sales dropped 17 percent in 2010 when local Palestinians started boycotting his products. His company has since recovered, growing by 18 percent last year.

Though only a fraction of Lipski’s products are shipped abroad — 16 percent of total sales are for export, of which a majority goes to Europe — Cohen acknowledges that the EU move to label settlement products is a real threat. Labeling settlement products, Cohen says, could hamper relations with retailers.

“I don’t think we’ve come to the level of a boycott, but labeling is half a boycott,” Cohen said. “The retailer will say, ‘I don’t want problems. Israel is not acting well.’ ”

A European boycott could have a much larger impact on SodaStream, which according to a 2012 Bloomberg News report looks to Europe for a majority of sales. The company’s CEO, Daniel Birnbaum, subsequently told the Forward recently that having a factory in a settlement was a “pain in the ass.”

The impact of a boycott, though hardly irrelevant, would be more limited for Psagot and Lipski, neither of which are as reliant on European business.

But neither Burg nor Cohen share Birnbaum’s sentiments about the virtues of operating a business in the West Bank. Nor does Rami Levy, the head of the budget supermarket chain Rami Levy Hashikma Market, which operates three locations in the West Bank.

For Burg, his vineyard’s location is in part an ideological statement of opposition to a Palestinian state. Cohen said he supports Israeli-Palestinian peace talks and the goal of a two-state solution. Like other CEOs of companies with West Bank operations, he believes his company furthers the cause of peace by giving jobs to Palestinians.

“Not only does it not do damage, it provides an example of how to live together, how we can do business together,” Levy said. “When you open businesses, you create more jobs. Just don’t discriminate based on religion, race and nationality.”

Levy, whose chain employs about 2,000 Palestinians, was part of a delegation of 100 Israeli businessmen to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, last month aimed at encouraging a peace agreement. More than half the 90 employees of Lipski’s West Bank factory are Palestinians. Burg employs four Palestinians out of 20 total employees.

Hilik Bar, who chairs the Knesset Caucus for Furthering Relations Between Israel and Europe, said Levy’s argument won’t convince Europeans in the absence of a peace agreement. Bar strongly opposes boycotts, but the Labor party lawmaker believes the government needs to pursue peace more aggressively.

“It’s not just the two [Scandinavian] banks; it is spreading everywhere,” said Bar, who also chairs the Caucus for the Promotion of a Solution for the Israeli-Arab Conflict. “Israel has an image as a state worthy to isolate. It’s a whole world we’re giving up on economically as long as we don’t come to a two-state solution.”

But Levy claims not to be worried. Europeans, he says, talk a good game when it comes to settlements, but ultimately they’re focused on the bottom line.

“If we let them profit, in the end they’ll invest,” he said. “The Europeans know one thing: Israel treats them well.”

For some West Bank CEOs, no lost sleep over boycott threat Read More »

Israeli pilots punished for storing sensitive data on smartphones

Two Israeli combat pilots were jailed for five days and 12 others were disciplined for storing operational maps on their smartphones, Israeli Army Radio reported on Wednesday.

Israeli military authorities discovered the security breach after one of the pilots reported he had lost his cellphone and that it contained sensitive data. It was recovered, the report said, and investigators found he had loaded maps, waypoints and other classified documents.

Other members of his squadron had done the same, so they could have the information readily at hand, the radio said.

The 14 pilots were court-martialed: two sent to jail, 11 received suspended sentences and one was fined.

Reporting by Jeffrey Heller, editing by Elizabeth Piper

Israeli pilots punished for storing sensitive data on smartphones Read More »

Easy, fool-proof recipes for Valentine’s Day dinner & dessert

Cooking a full meal can be overwhelming, especially when a) you don't cook very often and b) it's a high-pressure holiday like Valentine's Day.

Lucky for you, I have perfected the art of easy “fancy” food that tastes pretty darn good.

You can make the dessert ahead of time (in fact, it's best if you do) and everything else takes well-under an hour to prepare/cook/serve.

I promise–you'll be whipping out this recipe everytime you need to impress someone–including picky eaters.

Enjoy it with a bottle of vino and be prepared for a delicious food-induced coma afterwards. Viva la risotto!

Main Course–Parmesan risotto with sundried tomatoes (35-45 mins) 

Ingredients:

1 box parmesan risotto mix (like this)

1/3 cup parmesan cheese (pre-shaved or shredded) plus 2 tbsp

1 small jar (roughly 3oz) sundried tomatoes in oil

1 small onion, diced

5-7 croutons, crushed

3 tbsp melted butter

Directions: (*pre-heat the oven to 350 before starting)

1. Make the risotto according to the stovetop directions on the box (it usually involves adding water and then simmering)

2. While the risotto is cooking, pour the oil from the tomatoes into a small sautee pan.

3. Add the diced onions to the oil and cook on medium, til the onions are transluscent

4. While the onions are cooking, slice the tomatoes. As soon as they're sliced, add them to the onions in the sautee pan

5. Continue cooking until the onions get soft and golden. When done, take off heat and add the mixture (oil, onions, and sundried tomatoes) to the simmering risotto mix. Stir, and continue to let the risotto cook according to stovetop directions.

6. When the risotto is done, add the 1/3 cup parmesan cheese (while reserving the 2 tbsp) and mix in to the risotto.

7. Transfer the risotto to an oven-proof casserole dish. Sprinkle the crushed croutons and remaining parmesan cheese on top, then drizzle with melted butter.

8. Put in the oven for 10 minutes, or until the top is golden and slightly crispy

Side–Sauteed lemon and garlic greens (5-6 minutes–start this while the risotto is in the oven) Photo by Paul Cowan/Shutterstuck.com

Ingredients:

1 bunch greens (spinach or chard works best)

2 tbsp olive oil

1/2 small lemon

3 cloves garlic, minced (or the equivalent in garlic powder or jarred garlic)

 a couple dashes sea salt (or to taste)

a couple dashes black pepper (or to taste)

Directions:

1. Rinse the greens and remove/toss the stalks and stems

2. Put the olive oil in a large sautee pan or skillet, turn heat to medium

3. Add garlic and sautee for 1-2 minutes (until it starts to smell like cooked garlic–you'll know)

4. Toss in all the greens. Sautee until they start to get limp and slightly wilted (about 1 minute) making sure to move them around constantly with a big spoon. Squeeze the half lemon over the greens and sprinkle with sea salt and black pepper

5. Turn the burner off and move the greens around a little more–they'll continue to cook on the hot pan for another minute or two even after the burner is off

6. Serve next to the risotto

Strawberries with balsamic and brown sugar (5 minutes–prep a day before if possible)

Photo by: Photographee.eu/Shutterstock.com

Ingredients:

1 pint strawberries, rinsed and hulled (take that stem off!)

1/4 cup balsamic vinegar

3 tbsp brown sugar

Directions:

1. Slice the strawberries and place in a bowl

2. Pour the balsamic and sugar on top, gently mix it all together

3. Cover with plastic wrap (or place in tupperware) and let the mixture sit in the refrigerator until ready to serve (24 hours is ideal, but if you can only prepare the day-of, prep it before anything else so the flavors have time to meld together).

4. Stir, then serve in a bowl (or serve over pound cake if you're feeling super fancy).

Easy, fool-proof recipes for Valentine’s Day dinner & dessert Read More »