fbpx

August 15, 2013

Amid violent clashes, Egypt closes border with Gaza

Egypt closed the border between Sinai and the Gaza Strip as clashes between its government security forces and protesters backing deposed President Mohamed Morsi continued for a second day.

The Rafah crossing was closed “indefinitely,” the French news agency AFP reported Thursday, citing an unnamed Egyptian security official. The crossing was closed due to fears of terrorist activity in the Sinai Peninsula.

Rafah is the only border crossing out of the Gaza Strip that is not controlled by Israel.

The death toll in the clashes has risen to at least 421, and the injured at more than 3,000, according to reports.

The violence began Wednesday after government security forces raided two major sit-in protests in Cairo calling for the reinstatement of Morsi.

On Tuesday, a rocket fired by terrorists affiliated with al-Qaida at the southern Israeli city of Eilat was intercepted by the Iron Dome anti-missile system.

Last week the Eilat airport was closed for several hours due to warnings by Egyptian officials about a terror attack from the Sinai.

Amid violent clashes, Egypt closes border with Gaza Read More »

Family adrift in Pacific Ocean on mission to ‘see where God led us’

I've probably never been more stressed out then when I was entering my senior year of college. Two major moments were fast approaching: I was going to propose to my girlfriend and I was about to embark on a career in journalism (assuming someone would hire me and that was incredibly uncertain). The counsel I received from many friends was to pray about it. And I did.

But I've never been one to just ask God to tell me which direction I should head next. And that's what makes stories like this one so frustrating to read. Via “>GetReligion friends think.) It's with the wherever-God-takes-us attitude of the seafarers.

An analogy would be to the Gospel of wealth, which I've written critically about “>here. And just as giving money to God is not an investment plan — no matter what Family adrift in Pacific Ocean on mission to ‘see where God led us’ Read More »

The annual migration of North American Jews to college

When they are underway, the annual migrations of various animal species are truly magnificent to behold. By sea, land and sky, they move: the sea turtles and the baleen whales, the caribou and the wildebeests, the green darner dragonflies and the arctic terns and the free-tailed bats, among others. (See http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2010/11/great-migrations/; http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/animals/photo/.)

These migrations, which can transpire over thousands of miles, exhibit common characteristics. They suggest preparation and persistence, attentiveness, intentionality and unique allocations of energy. The participants will face distractions and temptations, but they will meet these challenges and more with what seems to be a shared sense of purpose. They are marvelous and inspiring adventures.

Perhaps these animals move because of some encoded instinct or perhaps from some form of communication we do not yet understand. Whatever the cause, they are not on an orderly and docile walk, two by two, as in the Noah fable. They are engaged in an existential activity, where travel is grueling and life and death are at issue for each animal individually and for the group as a collective, whether bale or pod or herd or team or swarm, flutter or flock.

Humans participate in seasonal movements, too. They are not as literally colorful or as dramatic in quantity or distance as the storied travels of the red crabs or the monarch butterflies.  No, these migrations are different, seasonal to be sure, but more dispersed and more conscious than those of other species.

Right now, the first of two annual migrations of North American Jews is underway. This first migration occurs over a period of several weeks. The migrating population is young, generally 18 through 21 years of age, though some are a bit younger and certainly some are older. Male and female they go, not to any one locale, but still to special places, where they will, like caterpillars, change and grow. Some will travel long distances and some will commute. Some will go to metropolitan areas and some to more rural settings. Some will go join large populations and some will go to be with small groups.

Not all in this age range will participate, but most will. They will go in droves, if not packs and prides. More than attending High Holy Day services, more than participating in a Passover seder, more than lighting Shabbat candles, young adult Jews go to college. Estimates vary, but perhaps 85-90% or more of young adult Jews go to college. (See, e.g., “Why More Colleges Want Jewish Students,” at http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/10/29/jewish; “American Jews,” at http://jbuff.com/c052302.htm.)

Some will go to elite private schools like the University of Chicago and Harvard University. Some will go to elite public schools, such as the University of Michigan and the University of California at Berkeley. They will go to college towns like Boulder and Tempe and Lawrence and Raleigh. And they will go to Miami, the one in Florida and the one in Ohio. They will go to major metropolitan areas, Los Angeles and New York, for instance. They will go to many and diverse places, but the key fact is that they will go, tens of thousands of them in any year.

The percentage of students who are Jewish at many schools is astonishing. Consider these figures for some private schools:

·         32% at Tulane University in New Orleans

·         30% at Emory University in Atlanta

·         29% at George Washington University in Washington D.C. and at Oberlin College in Ohio

·         27% at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut

·         25% at Washington University in St. Louis

 

Even at public schools, the percentages can be high:

·         22% at the University of Maryland in College Park

·         18% at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor

·         17% at the University of Florida in Gainesville

·         16% at Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey and at U. of California, Santa Cruz. 

 

Percentages can be deceiving, of course. Only 8% of the undergraduate population at the University of Texas is Jewish, but that 8% totals 4,000 students, more than twice as many as attend Brandeis University in Waltham, Massachusetts which is 50% Jewish. Five thousand (5,000) will go to Penn State, 4,000 more to Wisconsin, 3,000 to Cornell. (For a fuller list of schools and Jewish populations at them, see “Admissions 101 & 102” in What will they see and what will they hear? For most, the experience will be mind-expanding, as it should be. They may encounter new subjects, from archeology to zoology. They may drill deeper into formerly familiar concepts. No doubt old ideas will be challenged, old assumptions questioned. Their heads will be stuffed with dates and facts. Their brains will be asked to engage in critical thinking.

In the majority of cases, the young adults will succeed. Not only will they graduate, but many will continue their education.  In the Chicago area, for instance, about forty percent (40%) will earn graduate degrees. (See And when they get out, when they emerge from their collegiate chrysalis, what will they know? Many things, of course, but here’s one thought they think is true. According to a relatively recent survey at a Reform congregation in Springfield, Massachusetts, a clear majority (51%) of Jews aged twenty-something who responded agreed with the proposition: “Science explains everything, making God an unnecessary hypothesis.” (See “The God Survey” in Reform Judaism (Summer 2012) (The Massachusetts survey is flawed, of course. The sample is small and the questions do not allow for subtle responses. Indeed, how many scientists believe that science explains “everything”? We cannot even define “everything.” Nevertheless, we understand the message and the results are not (or should not be) surprising. Whatever they learned in Hebrew School or Sunday school, in whatever congregation they belonged just a few years earlier — let’s call it pediatric Judaism–they seem to have rejected. What they have replaced it with, if anything, is much, much less clear. What is clear is that the pediatric Judaism that might once have been sufficient to sustain the children of Israel is no longer suitable for many of the adults of Israel.

If Jewish college graduates in North America are the future of the Jewish people in North America (and they are), and if Judaism is the evolving, religious civilization of the Jewish people, as Having planned so hopefully, worked so hard, sacrificed so much to make sure that they received a “higher education,” we should not be afraid of the consequences of that education. Rather, we need to listen to what these new BAs and BSs and MBAs and JDs are saying, verbally and physically, about their Jewishness. We won’t need a PhD in sociology or psychology to understand that they have read too much literature to be moved by mere lore, studied too much science to be captivated by fable, learned too many facts to be swayed by fiction, and, not incidentally, met too many different kinds of good and decent people to be committed without question to their tribe. We need to engage with these young Jews on the level they have now reached, help them move beyond pediatric Judaism by showing them that there can indeed be a vibrant Judaism that their minds can affirm, a positive Judaism for the adults of Israel worthy of being chosen by them as educated members of that community.

Obama condemns violence in Egypt, cancels military exercises

President Barack Obama announced on Thursday that the United States is canceling joint military exercises with Egypt next month, saying normal U.S. cooperation cannot continue in light of the armed forces' bloody crackdown.

“The United States strongly condemns the steps that have been taken by Egypt's interim government and security forces,” Obama said on the Massachusetts island of Martha's Vineyard, where he is on vacation.

“We deplore violence against civilians. We support universal rights essential to human dignity, including the right to peaceful protest,” he said in his first remarks since the crackdown began early Wednesday. At least 525 people have been killed and thousands wounded.

Washington provides $1.3 billion in military aid and about $250 million in economic aid to Egypt every year, which it has been reluctant to cut off for fear of losing leverage there and in the broader region.

Stopping military exercises in Egypt was one clear way the White House could show its displeasure. Other than a previously announced decision to halt delivery of four U.S.-made F-16 fighters, it was the first significant U.S. move to penalize Egypt's military rulers.

Obama said the United States had informed Egyptian authorities it had canceled the joint military drill named “Bright Star” that had been scheduled for next month. He said the state of emergency should be lifted in Egypt and a process of national reconciliation started.

“While we want to sustain our relationship with Egypt, our traditional cooperation cannot continue as usual when civilians are being killed in the streets and rights are being rolled back,” Obama said.

“Going forward, I've asked my national security team to assess the implications of the actions taken by the interim government and further steps we may take as necessary with respect to the U.S.-Egyptian relationship.” He did not elaborate.

The military drill, which dates back to 1981, is seen as a cornerstone of U.S.-Egyptian military relations. It began after the Camp David Peace Accords between Egypt and Israel.

Obama, who departed for a game of golf shortly after making his statement, vented frustration that both sides in the Egyptian conflict were blaming the United States for the turmoil in the country since the military ousted Mohamed Morsi, Egypt's first freely elected president, on July 3.

The United States has insisted it is not taking sides. But it chose not to condemn Morsi's ouster or call for his reinstatement, leaving the impression that it had tacitly sided with the military and accepted a coup.

“We've been blamed by supporters of Morsi. We've been blamed by the other side as if we are supporters of Morsi. That kind of approach will do nothing to help Egyptians achieve the future that they deserve,” Obama said.

“We want Egypt to succeed. We want a peaceful, democratic, prosperous Egypt. That's our interest. But to achieve that, the Egyptians are going to have to do the work.”

CALLS FOR END TO AID

On Thursday, hundreds of supporters of Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood stormed a government building in Cairo and set it ablaze as fury over a security crackdown on the Islamist movement that killed hundreds of people spilled on to the streets.

Egypt, the Arab world's most populous nation, is of strategic importance because of its peace treaty with close U.S. ally Israel and its control of the Suez Canal, a vital waterway for trade and for the U.S. military.

Held every two years, the “Bright Star” exercise also was canceled in 2011 because of the political turmoil in Egypt following the ouster of longtime autocrat and U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak.

Several thousand U.S. troops were slated to participate in the exercise, which was due to begin Sept. 18, said Max Blumenfeld, spokesman for U.S. Central Command, which oversees operations in the Middle East and central Asia. He said past exercises focused on integration of naval forces, airborne operations, field exercises and disposal of explosive ordnance.

Some analysts and lawmakers questioned whether the cancellation of military exercises was enough.

“This falls well short of the fundamental rethinking and reorientation that is necessary right now,” said Shadi Hamid, director of research for the Brookings Doha Center and a fellow at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings.

“If the US wants to reestablish its leverage it will actually have to do something to show it is serious. The first serious step would be cutting aid, then there would be no doubt that finally the US is serious about using its leverage.”

Senator Patrick Leahy, a Democrat and chairman of the Senate appropriations subcommittee in charge of foreign aid, said that military aid to Egypt should stop under a U.S. law that triggers an aid cutoff if a military coup has taken place. The administration has repeatedly said it has not determined whether the military's actions in Cairo amounted to a coup.

“While suspending joint military exercises as the president has done is an important step, our law is clear: aid to the Egyptian military should cease unless they restore democracy,” Leahy said in a statement.

The full Senate Appropriations Committee late last month voted to tie aid to Cairo to the restoration of a democratically elected government in Egypt. But the legislation is still working its way through Congress and has not become law.

Reporting by Steve Holland and Jeff Mason in Martha's Vineyard; additional reporting by Arshad Mohammed, Lesley Wroughton, Susan Heavey, Susan Cornwell, Andrea Shalal-Esa and Tabassum Zakaria in Washington; Editing by Warren Strobel and David Storey

Obama condemns violence in Egypt, cancels military exercises Read More »

Give Peace A Chance – by David Harris

David Harris is the Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, and he recently wrote two pieces that appeared in The Jerusalem Post and The Huffington Post explaining why this is the time for the Israelis and Palestinians to make peace and find a two-state solution to their conflict.

David is what most would characterize as “middle-right” on the political spectrum when it comes to Israel. A staunch supporter of the Jewish state, he has always been deeply concerned for Israel’s security and a powerful American Jewish advocate for a close American-Israeli relationship.

In light of his long-standing public advocacy for Israel, the harsh criticism of him from both the political left and the political right in the Jewish and non-Jewish worlds is of interest, and his response to these critics that appeared yesterday in both The Jerusalem Post and The Huffington Post is an important read (see links below).

I believe that David is correct in his arguments.

As I watched the Israeli government release long-time imprisoned terrorist murderers of innocent non-military Israeli citizens (men, women and children), I felt a certain horror for the families of the victims and real fear that these terrorists might return to repeat their crimes once released.

I have wondered, as well, that despite the fact that virtually all the newly announced building of settlements was not a surprise and that these building projects are in large settlement blocks that Israel fully expects to keep in any future peace deal, why the Netanyahu government did not promise to stop all that settlement building as long as negotiations were taking place instead of releasing murderers.

Having wondered this aloud I do not want to second guess PM Netanyahu, especially since the release of these murderers had to have been excruciatingly painful for him and for the majority of his cabinet who voted with him. I believe we have to give them the benefit of the doubt on the prisoner release.

Netanyahu must have felt that he had no political or diplomatic choice. No one knows the pressures he feels. No one knows what he is actually thinking, nor what is his strategy. I hope it is straight up and that an end-of-conflict peace agreement with all issues resolved is his true goal.

Time will tell and I wish PM Netanyahu, President Abbas and the negotiating teams of both Israel and the Palestinians God-speed.

Read David Harris here: Jerusalem Post http://blogs.jpost.com/content/give-peace-process-chance-part-two?msource=DAH081513 ; Huffington Post http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-harris/give-the-peace-process-a-_1_b_3757913.html?msource=DAH081513

Give Peace A Chance – by David Harris Read More »

The American Zion Exchange, Part 2: The Old Testament as a Common Denominator in Early America

Eran Shalev is a Professor of History at Haifa University. A former Fulbright scholar who received his PhD from Johns Hopkins University, Shalev has written and published extensively on American History and is an International Contributing editor of The Journal of American History. The Following exchange will focus on his new book 'American Zion: The Old Testament as a Political Text from the Revolution to the Civil War' (Yale University Press, 2013).

Part 1 of the exchange can be found right here.

 

Dear Professor Shalev,

Thank you for your interesting first reply. After beginning with a question about the change in American attitudes to the old testament over time, I'd like to take a step back and ask about how uniform American attitudes toward the old testament were in the earliest days of the republic-

Interestingly, the deep influence of the old testament did not pass over the three most famous deists of the time: Thomas Paine (whose references to Gideon in his celebrated 'Common Sense' may very well have made a profound impression on early American political culture), Thomas Jefferson, and Benjamin Franklin.

My second question concerns the difference between these (and other) deists' more cultural/ethical attitude toward the stories of the Old Testament and that of their more traditionally religious Christian contemporaries who saw things quite differently. Were the more pious early Americans ever suspicious of the deists' use of biblical references for the promotion of (essentially secular) humanistic values or was the bible more of a common ground between the two groups?  Were there ever conscious exploitations of religious sensitivities at the time for humanistic causes? How open and honest was public discourse in that sense?

I'm looking forward to reading your answer,

Best Regards,

Shmuel.

 

Dear Shmuel,

The late eighteenth century was not a particularly religious era in American history, certainly in comparison with other periods. The creation of the United States occurred between two Great Awakenings and was strongly influenced by the anti-clerical European Enlightenment. The American Enlightenment may have not been as secular minded as its continental counterpart, but that movement was still inclined toward critical approaches to revelatory religion. Accordingly, the Founders were not an especially religious bunch, as were many of their contemporary Americans.

Hence it is particularly significant that they and their compatriots chose to represent the young American nation as a New Israel. And as you point out in your question, even the least pious, indeed deist, of Founders leaned heavily on the Old Testament: while a significant portion (about a quarter!) of Thomas Pain’s Common Sense is devoted to the Hebrew Bible, Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin proposed (separately) in 1776 – the same year that Common Sense was published – scenes from the Exodus for the young nation’s Great Seal. Countless Americans who were more pious than that deist founding triumvirate gladly embraced depictions of their country as the Second Israel.

So the Old Testament’s relevance to the American political life might have been one issue towards which attitudes were virtually uniform: it is hard to find even a single public speaker who denied the bearing of the biblical Israelites and their history to the United States. Nevertheless, on the meaning of that relevance we find significant variance: while some optimistic commentators chose to emphasize the advantages of being a Chosen People, others feared that God would abandon America if it would not stand up to the highest of moral and political standards just as he abandoned the sinning Israelites. Such variances seem not have stemmed from people’s deism as opposed to being traditional Christians, but was rather rooted in one’s Calvinism (and thus sin oriented) or evangelicalism (and the implied focus on narratives of redemption).

The uniformity in the representation of the United States as the New Israel is impressive. As I have already indicated, we are hard pressed to find even one dissenting voice that questioned such understandings. Things did not change as time passed. In fact, the zenith of the political use of the Hebrew Bible occurred after the founding era and corresponded with the Second Great Awakening (1800-1840). During the first decades of the nineteenth century the most extensive and colorful use of the history of biblical Israel took place, and with it the impression of the biblical Israelites on the American imagination. Such was the power of the paradigm that even harsh critics of the surging evangelical enthusiasm (evangelists being the most prolific and colorful employers of Old Testament narratives) did not raise doubts regarding the notion of the new or second Israel. The public discourse seems to never have challenged that consensus, as discussions were confined to addressing its different meanings in changing political and historical contexts. When the use of the Old Testament waned, and with it the notion of the Second Israel, it was not in a firestorm of debate but rather through a prolonged process which was unnoticed at the time. 

 

 

The American Zion Exchange, Part 2: The Old Testament as a Common Denominator in Early America Read More »

August 15, 2013

The US

Headline: U.S. Condemns Crackdown but Announces No Policy Shift

To Read: Marc Lynch believes that the US should make a statement and cut its aid to Egypt-

With blood in Egypt's streets and a return to a state of emergency, it's time for Washington to stop pretending. Its efforts to maintain its lines of communication with the Egyptian military, quietly mediate the crisis, and help lay the groundwork for some new, democratic political process have utterly failed. Egypt's new military regime, and a sizable and vocal portion of the Egyptian population, have made it very clear that they just want the United States to leave it alone. For once, Washington should give them their wish. As long as Egypt remains on its current path, the Obama administration should suspend all aid, keep the embassy in Cairo closed, and refrain from treating the military regime as a legitimate government.

Quote: “Since I was here last year, we have better military options than we did a year ago”, General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, commenting on Iran during his trip to the Middle East.

Number: 19, Eliot Spitzer is leading the Democratic primary race for New York City Comptroller by 19 points.

 

Israel

Headline: Israel, Palestinian negotiators meet in Jerusalem in total secrecy

To Read: Peter Beinhart tries to figure out what's behind Netanyahu's insistence that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish State-

On the surface, Netanyahu’s insistence that Abbas recognize Israel as a “Jewish state” makes little sense. In the Camp David Accords, Egypt didn’t recognize Israel “as a Jewish state.” It just recognized Israel. Same with Jordan when it made peace in 1994. Ditto with the Palestine Liberation Organization, the organization Abbas now leads, which recognized “the right of the State of Israel to exist in peace and security,” in the Oslo Accords signed 20 years ago. Until recently, it wasn’t even clear if the United States recognized Israel as a “Jewish state.”

As Abbas declared in 2010, Israel is “free to call itself the Israeli Zionist Jewish Empire” if it wants. Why does Netanyahu need the Palestinians to define what Israel is?

Quote:   “This area was monitored by Hezbollah and we received confirmation that an Israeli patrol would enter the area, so we planted explosives there”, Hezbollah Chief, Hassan Nassrallah, claiming responsibility for the blast that wounded 4 Israeli soldiers last week.

Number: $800-900m, the estimated price IBM is expected to pay for Israeli Data Security company Trusteer.

 

The Middle East

Headline: Egypt death toll hits 525 as Cairo streets remain eerily calm day after brutal crackdown on Morsi supporters

To Read: The New Yorker's Dexter Filkins takes a look at Erdogan's show trials-

How does Erdoğan get away with it? One reason, surely, is the silence of the Obama Administration. For all of Erdoğan’s heavy-handed tactics, the White House still sees him as a Middle Eastern moderate, a freely elected Muslim leader who is friendly to the West. There aren’t many of those. So, to a remarkable degree, Erdoğan gets a pass. Last week, two days after the conviction of Şirin and the two hundred-plus others in the Ergenekon trial, Erdoğan spoke on the phone with President Obama. According to a White House press release, the two leaders talked about the upheavals in Egypt and Syria.

But not a word about what’s happening in Turkey itself.

Quote:  “The Government of Syria has formally accepted the modalities essential for cooperation to ensure the proper, safe and efficient conduct of the mission”, UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's spokesman announcing that the UN is sending chemical experts to Syria. 

Number: 1, the CIA ranks Syria as the number 1 threat to US national security (before Iran).

 

The Jewish World

Headline: New chief rabbis sworn in, commit to bringing Am Yisrael together

To Read: Adam Kirsch tries to imagine how the Rabbis of the Talmud would respond to the lifestyle and habits of modern American Jewry-

All this made me wonder, as I have many times before in reading the Talmud, what the rabbis would make of the situation of American Jewry today. No one can say that America lacks rabbis to point out the correct halakhah, as the Jews of Kabul did. But the vast majority of Jews—unaffiliated, Reform, and even Conservative—have effectively cast off rabbinic guidance and have decided to invent their own Jewish customs. Some keep kosher at home but eat in non-kosher restaurants; some attend Shabbat services, but get there by driving to synagogue. The compromises of American Jewish life are legion.

Would these customs earn the rabbis’ respect, since they are the established practice of the majority? Or would we seem to them like Cutheans, who have lost the knowledge of the law and need to be treated with extra strictness?

Quote:  “Even though Judaism has quite a humane approach to abortion, the Jewish community as a whole still often does not speak openly about abortion. Many women who have had abortions experience solitude and loneliness and even a fear of social judgment”, Elana Sztokman, executive director of the Jewish Orthodox Feminist Alliance, one of the interviewees in a Tablet piece about a new Jewish ritual that comforts women who have had abortions.

Number: 90, fewer than 90 Jews remain in Yemen.

August 15, 2013 Read More »