fbpx

July 1, 2013

S. Africa’s Jewish community offers prayers for Mandela

South Africa’s chief rabbi, Warren Goldstein, conveyed the Jewish community’s prayers and support to the daughter of ailing former President Nelson Mandela.

Mandela, 94, remains critically ill in a Pretoria hospital.

Dr. Makaziwe Mandela thanked the Jewish community on behalf of the Mandela family for its “love and support at this difficult time” as well as in the past.

“Makaziwe specifically said that I should convey to the Jewish community that her father cherishes the special and warm relationship he has had with South African Jews throughout his life,” the chief rabbi wrote in a message to the community on Friday. “She said her father deeply appreciates that throughout his life he has enjoyed the warmth, kindness and support of our community.”

[Related: A South African rabbi reflects on Nelson Mandela and the Jewish community]

Goldstein also requested that all congregational rabbis recite special prayers for Mandela during Sabbath services.

“At this time let us continue to pray for the comfort, strength and well-being of President Mandela as he continues to bravely fight for his life,” he wrote.

More on Nelson Mandela: 

S. Africa’s Jewish community offers prayers for Mandela Read More »

Climate crisis and the birth of eco-Judaism

During the past generation, we have discovered that we are facing a global crisis in the relationship between human action and the web of life on Earth. That discovery has stirred an ancient but sleeping Jewish concern for the Earth into new energy and a new approach —   Eco-Judaism.

One of the most powerful and delightful doorways into Eco-Judaism is simply two words of Hebrew: adam and adamah. Adam means “human being,” and adamah means “earth.”

The two words say in the very words themselves what is true in reality: the earth and human beings are intertwined. Their meaning is totally different from that of the English word “environment” –- for that means something that is “out there,” in the environs. The truth is that  trees and tigers, bees and bacteria, are not “out there,” away from us humans. Our lives are totally intertwined.

Indeed, we now know that in our own kishkes, our own innards or intestines, are myriads of bacteria that keep us healthy. Occasionally some turn up that make us sick, but usually they are chewed up by life-giving microbes like those that turn milk into cheese.

So the most dramatic way we are intertwined is in our bellies. But there is more: We are beginning to understand that human beings are part of a planetary eco-system. We get to breathe the oxygen we need only because trees and grasses breathe it out. And the trees breathe in the CO2 that we breathe out. Without this interchange between each other, we – and all life on our planet – would die.

We have seen how two words of Hebrew communicate this interconnection so simply. Is there a way to say this intertwining in English? If the ordinary word for human being were “earthling,” that would signal how intertwined we are. Or if the ordinary word for earth were “humus,” that would do it. But these two words are specialized –- one in science fiction, the other in soil science. So it is hard for the English language to teach what Hebrew teaches so simply and organically.

The poetry of Torah goes further, using these two words to point to the origin of our entire species as a birth from Earth. Adamah births adam.

What is the story?

In Genesis 2: 6-8, the Torah tells this story of the creation of the human race:

There was no human/adam to till the soil/adama.

YHVH, God, formed the human, of dust from the soil, he blew into his nostrils the breath of life and the human became a living being.

I am using the translation by Everett Fox (Schocken), precisely because unlike most translations it makes explicit and inescapable the connection between “adamah” and “adam.”  But I am using “YHWH” where Fox uses “YHVH,” because in biblical Hebrew the letter “vav” was pronounced more like “waw,” just as in ancient Latin the letter “v” is pronounced the way in modern English we would signal by using a “w.”

Let’s unpeel this brief yet crucial telling. In being “born” from the Earth, the Human loses the breathing-sound of the “—ah” in “adamah.” Shorn of this breathing sound, s/he becomes “adam.” Then at once the Human receives the breath of life directly from YHWH.

Compare this sequence with what happens in a normal birthing of an ordinary single human being.  In the womb, the would-be baby breathes in and out unconsciously, through the placenta as part of the mother’s breathing. When in birthing the placenta falls away, the new baby must receive the breath of life from outside—sometimes with a tap on the tush.

The biblical story of the birth of the human race is literally borrowing from the birthing of one child to describe the birthing of our species.

Here Earth indeed is Mother Earth, and the Torah goes on to say that when we lose that breath of life, we return to Mother Earth.

We are interwoven.

This is the profound perception of an indigenous people, farmers and shepherds who lived close to the land and were constantly aware of how they gave life to the Earth, and the Earth gave life to them.  They understood the relationship as sacred. The food that came forth from this relationship was what they offered back to YHWH at the Temple, in token of the gift of life they had received from YHWH.

When the Temple was destroyed and the people were overwhelmed by the Roman Empire and Hellenistic economics and philosophy, they grasped the value of a new way of connecting with God —   — the speaking and chanting of words. Words of prayer, words of learning and reinterpreting Torah. Words they could take with them anywhere, unlike the land from which they were exiled.

This was in many ways a great and crucial discovery It made possible the survival of the Jewish people and a new paradigm of Jewish life – Rabbinic Judaism. But it also  carried a cost – much less attention to the earth and its interconnection with the human race.

It is only now, facing a planetary crisis in that relationship, that we are beginning to reopen the wisdom of the Hebrew Bible about the Earth. Reopening it with a broader perspective  — looking not only at our interconnection in a tiny sliver of land on the eastern shore of the Mediterranean, but at the great round globe.

And that reinterpretive reopening is what we mean by “Eco-Judaism.” It is why this blog comes from “Eco-Rebbe.”

Climate crisis and the birth of eco-Judaism Read More »

Stay tuned

Hi, my name is Zan and I’m a pop culture junkie. I can reliably name that show, movie, or song snippet and tell you who sings it, who she’s dating, who he’s rumored to be dating on the side. Television is my substance of choice: I grew up on Nickelodeon and Disney’s TGIF programming block, progressed to the WB’s teen dramas and spent a good chunk of my college education borrowing DVDs and learning how to stream shows (oh those dark pre-Netflix days!) so I could catch up on the really good stuff—The West Wing, The Wire, the second season of the American Office: you know, the classics.

I’m thrilled to be the Jewish Journal’s new television blogger. It is, as I think everyone agrees, a great time for TV, with the format really coming into its own creatively and narratively as companies like Netflix and Hulu open up new possibilities on the business side. Summer is traditionally a quiet season for new content but as we move towards a more year-round model there’s plenty to see and talk about right now, both old favorites returning and new contenders stepping up to the plate.

My plan is to try a mix of coverage, writing overnight recaps of what I’m watching (True Blood, MTV’s surprisingly dark and interesting Teen Wolf, ABC Family’s new show Twisted) plus some up-to-the-minute news and longer-form pieces on full seasons already aired.

So sit back, relax and tune in along with me—and please feel free to get in touch if there’s something I should be watching, covering or thinking about. I’m hoping to build a really interactive community here, so conversation is always welcome!

Stay tuned Read More »

Kerry on the couch

We now join U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry lying on the couch in his therapist’s office:

Therapist: “When did you get back from Jerusalem?”

Kerry: “Hmm, I’m not sure. I ran out of Ambien on the trip so I’m a little sleep-deprived right now. But I think it was this morning.”

Therapist: “You take Ambien?”

Kerry: “You kidding? How else could I survive all these trips I’m making to Israel? This was my fifth one there since March. I think I beat Kissinger’s record from 1973.”

Therapist: “Why do you keep going there?”

Kerry: “Have you been talking to my wife? She’s always asking me that. I keep going to Israel because I want to go down in history. Not go down in history, but go down in history.”

Therapist: “What do you mean?”

Kerry: “Ever since I took this job, all the smart people have been telling me to stay away from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. That it’s a snake pit — an impossible mission. That the Middle East is burning and there are other places that need my attention a lot more.”

Therapist: “Are they right?”

Kerry: “Maybe, but I don’t really care. I want to do what all my predecessors failed to do.”

Therapist: “Tell me about that.”

Kerry: “I want to do great things. I want to be better than everyone else. Like we’ve talked about before, I was never popular with the girls in high school. I was kind of awkward and gawky. So I compensated by doing a lot of things.”

Therapist: “Like what?”

Kerry: “You know, I would just work harder than everyone else. Chess club. Tennis. Debating club. Fencing. Wrestling. No challenge was too big for me. That’s the way it’s been my whole life — Vietnam, the Senate, the White House.”

Therapist: “But you lost the White House.”

Kerry: “Please don’t remind me.”

Therapist: “That’s what I’m here for.  How did it make you feel?”

Kerry: “You sure you want to get into this?”

Therapist: “Of course, it’s important. This is how we’ll get some real work done.”

Kerry: “Well, the loss killed me. I came this close to the top of the mountain. This close to being numero uno in the world. And I lost to a cowboy — to the big man on campus. It brought me back to my high school days … when I had to claw my way to compete with the cool guys.”

Therapist: “Tell me more about that.”

Kerry: “I crashed. I felt as if everything I had accomplished up until then was for naught. As if I’d been transported right back to high school, to being that awkward and gawky kid trying desperately to be popular.”

Therapist: “How did you deal with it?”

Kerry: “I put on an act. I pretended I was OK, even with my wife and kids. But inside, I was dying.”

Therapist: “How long did it last?”

Kerry: “Right up until I was chosen to be secretary of state earlier this year. That’s when I started getting out of my funk. Now I can get back that mountain I lost.”

Therapist: “What do you mean?”

Kerry: “Look, even though I lost the White House, I have a chance now to win the Nobel Peace Prize. There’s nothing cooler in the world. Nothing more popular! I will work harder than ever to win it.”

Therapist: “But what if you don’t?”

Kerry: “Failure is not an option.”

Therapist: “John, I don’t want to see you crash again. You need to feel OK inside so that the external losses won’t devastate you.”

Kerry: “The only way I will feel OK inside is if I win. And I know I can do it. I just know it. People are telling me that I’m banging my head against a wall — that despite all these trips and meetings, neither side is budging an inch. But I will wear them down, you’ll see.”

Therapist: “Why do you think you can succeed?”

Kerry: “Here’s something you don’t know, doc. In international diplomacy, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the holy grail. It doesn’t matter that thousands of people are being murdered all around there. All the eyes of the world are on the Jews and the Palestinians.”

Therapist: “So, what will you do?”

Kerry: “Look, the world is so obsessed with this conflict that they gave that terrorist Arafat a Nobel prize just for taking meetings! Now, if I can only get Bibi and Abbas in the same room, I really think I have a shot at the big prize. I’m only slightly exaggerating.”

Therapist: “Seriously? But what if you fail even at that?”

Kerry: “I’ll do what I always do — I’ll work even harder! I told you: Failure is not an option.”

Therapist: “OK, John. I’ll see you at our next session. Get some rest.” 

Kerry on the couch Read More »

‘Price tag’ attackers put on same legal ground as terrorists

Planning and carrying out “price tag” attacks in Israel will now be defined as “illegal organizing,” which puts the acts on the same level as Islamic terror groups.

The new designation announced Monday by Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon means that the Jewish perpetrators of such violence would face the same legal repercussions as Palestinian terrorists.

The new designation will allow Israeli security services and police to hold suspects in jail longer, keep them under arrest until the end of legal proceedings and investigate without the presence of an attorney.  Those who plan and fund price tag attacks will be subject to the same proceedings.

“Price tag perpetrators’ conduct is identical to the conduct of modern terrorist groups, including ideological inspiration and covert action,” the Defense Ministry said in a statement. “Its main objective is to prevent the legitimate Israeli government from carrying out actions, whether of state or regarding law enforcement, and to sow fear among the nation’s leaders of making decisions of one kind or another.”

The designation was approved last month by Israel’s Cabinet.

The announcement came Monday after the arrest of a 22-year-old right-wing Israeli from Bnei Brak for last year’s price tag attack on the Latrun Monastery.

‘Price tag’ attackers put on same legal ground as terrorists Read More »

Eric Garcetti: L.A.’s first (elected) Jewish mayor

On May 22, 2013, the day after Los Angeles voters elected him mayor of Los Angeles, something astonishing happened to Eric Garcetti: He became Jewish. 

No, he didn’t suddenly convert. Garcetti never hid the fact that he contained multitudes. His father, Gil Garcetti, is Mexican-American with Spanish, Native American and Italian ancestry. His mother, Sukey Roth, is the granddaughter of Russian-Jewish immigrants.

In L.A. terms, that makes Garcetti a pretty common blend of many ethno-religious flavors — an L.A. smoothie. But according to the Jewish law of descent, which is matrilineal, that makes Garcetti a full-on Jew. To those of us who have tracked Garcetti’s career, none of this was surprising. But to that ever-shrinking demographic known as the L.A. city voter, it seems to have come as a shock.

“Most people didn’t know that during the election,” 5th District City Councilman Paul Koretz told a reporter.

In part, that’s the fault of our own preconceptions. The most obvious way we assess a candidate’s identity is by name and face. Zev Yaroslavsky and Antonio Villaraigosa and Herb Wesson are easy — Jew, Latino, black. But Judaism is both a religion and a culture, and the big trend in Jewish life is just how much the old phrase, “Funny, you don’t look Jewish,” reflects the new reality of Ethiopian Jews, “Jewtino” conversos and Chinese-born adoptees, not to mention Persian and Middle Eastern Jews. The garden-variety white, Ashkenazic Jew is becoming as rare as a great Westside deli. 

But the other reason people didn’t realize Garcetti is Jewish is because, as a candidate, he didn’t talk much about that side of his heritage.

“I always felt myself to be Jewish and Latino very comfortably,” Garcetti told Jewish Journal columnist Bill Boyarsky in a rare candidate profile that delved into his religious identity. “Weekends were both filled with bowls of menudo and lots of bagels.”

Garcetti told Boyarsky that, growing up, he celebrated Passover and Chanukah and attended Jewish camp. He only became more connected to his Judaism in college. 

Garcetti is now a member of IKAR, a progressive Mid-City congregation. He attends High Holy Days and occasional Shabbat services — what we in the trade call a twice-a-year Jew. Garcetti’s wife, Amy Wakeland, is not Jewish.

By these measures, Garcetti is like a great many modern American Jews — the offspring of an interfaith couple, intermarried, liberal and more culturally than religiously Jewish.

After the election, a small dispute arose among journalists over whether Garcetti was, in fact, the first Jewish mayor of Los Angeles. It turns out that from Nov. 21 to Dec. 5, 1878, a businessman named Bernard Cohn served as the interim mayor, appointed by the L.A. Common Council, predecessor of the City Council. That would have made him the equivalent of today’s mayor pro tempore, a position Garcetti and other Jews also have held. Garcetti is the first elected Jewish mayor in L.A. history: Case closed.

His election represents a kind of culmination of modern-day L.A. Jewish political involvement that began with the 1953 election of Rosalind Wiener Wyman to the City Council and flowered with the African-American-Jewish coalition that elected Tom Bradley as mayor in 1973.

But even so, Jews never occupied the highest citywide office. The last election changed that in a big, sweeping way, bringing into office not only Garcetti, but also a Jewish city controller, Ron Galperin, and a Jewish city attorney, Michael Feuer.

The surprise isn’t that Los Angeles would eventually have a Jewish mayor — as do New York and Chicago, by the way — just that Garcetti is, actually, Jewish.

All of which begs this one, very obvious, question: So what? 

Jews have finally reached the top job at a time when the idea of a pure ethnic voting bloc seems as timely as Tammany Hall. If at one time the Jewish vote automatically defaulted to the Jewish candidate, that’s no longer the case. Today’s Jewish vote tends to go to the candidate who best articulates and can best deliver on a socially progressive, fiscally prudent, pro- (or at least not anti-) Israel agenda.

Whether you take the position that Garcetti’s Jewishness doesn’t matter or that it only does if he makes his people proud — either way you’re missing the point. To me, the question more interesting than “So what?” is “What now?”

What, in a secular, assimilated age does it mean to be the first Jewish mayor? Is it just a description for the record books or does it also imply a responsibility? 

The religious believe that their faith calls them to behave a certain way, to stand for certain things. What is a largely secular Jew called to do as a Jew? Are there values and principles, perhaps not unique to Judaism, but certainly integral to it, that he will feel charged to uphold? Is there a Jewish vision of social justice, of environmental and communal stewardship, that will guide his decisions? What does it mean not just to choose to be labeled as a Jew, but to choose to act as one? This, of course, is a question facing every Jew in the modern age, not just Eric Garcetti, who, on June 30, became the first elected Jewish mayor of Los Angeles. 

Eric Garcetti: L.A.’s first (elected) Jewish mayor Read More »

Norman Lamm’s letter announcing departure from Yeshiva University

Rabbi Norman Lamm, who serves as Yeshiva University’s president, chancellor and head of its rabbinical school, announced his departure on Monday in a letter acknowledging his failure to respond adequately to sexual abuse allegations against two rabbis at Y.U.’s high school for boys in the 1980s. [UPDATE: The school has issued a statement saying that “Rabbi Lamm's decision to retire is based on an agreement that was reached three years ago” and “his contract expired June 30.”]

The full text of his letter, which was sent to students, faculty, alumni and donors, according to a Y.U. spokesman, follows. He addresses the sexual allegations in paragraphs 6-9.

Dear Friends,

When we celebrated the ninetieth birthday of my dear father, zikhrono liverakhah, I cited the Mishnah in Avot 5:21, ben tish’im la-shu-ach. Despite the standard explanation that at ninety years old a person is stooped and decrepit, and there is much truth to that, I offered a more sensitive and profound interpretation. Without going into all of the details, I observed that hishtachavayah, the prostration of the attendee at the Jerusalem Temple, was the final ritual performed at the culmination of the divine service. Through prostration pilgrims stopped to reflect on their heavenly encounter and offered their gratitude and appreciation for the opportunity to serve God through the divine service. At ninety, I suggested, a person stops to reflect on a life well lived, a family raised, professional and personal achievements, spiritual growth, accomplishments, mistakes, successes and failures—and pauses for hishtachavayah, a moment of reflection, gratitude, and appreciation.

While I have yet to reach my father’s age, at this moment of transition in accordance with an agreement reached 3 years ago—as I step down from my positions as Chancellor of Yeshiva University and Rosh Hayeshivah, ending over sixty years of official affiliation with my beloved Yeshiva University as student, faculty member, Rosh Hayeshivah, President, and Chancellor—I use this moment for mishtachavim u-modim—pause, reflection, and expression of gratitude. Before beginning, I want to acknowledge that conditions have caused me to rely on help from my family in writing this letter.

Yeshiva nurtured me, challenged me, and formed me. Yeshiva took me in as a young, untested, and unproven boy and gave me opportunities for religious and intellectual growth, personal development, and professional achievement. For these sixty years I lived and breathed Yeshiva, its problems, its challenges, and its successes. I enjoyed opportunities that I never dreamed would be offered me: leadership, responsibility, the trust of a community, the affection and support of many from world leaders to drawers of water, and the pulpit of the Orthodox and Jewish world. The day I became President in 1976 I was humbled to occupy the offices of my rebbeim, mentors, and predecessors — Dr. Revel, Dr. Belkin, the Rav, zikhronam livrakhah – and a host of other rebbeim, professors, administrators, and lay leaders; I continue to be humbled and incredulous today as I step down. I would like to believe that I was a worthy custodian of their creation and leave the institution and the Torah u-Madda community more vital, vibrant, and effective religiously, academically, communally, and financially. Yeshiva University is not only an institution. It is a faith, a vision, a dream, a destiny. It has been my faith, my vision, my dream, and my destiny. It is the kind of faith that elicited from me, and from so many for over 125 years, work, dedication, and endless effort and endeavor.

It would be too easy at this moment in Yeshiva’s history, when fortune smiles on us and we are a top-ranked university and a thriving bet midrash, when things are largely going our way, to forget past adversities and difficulties and to think that our successes are part of the very fabric of our existence. We cannot assume that it is natural and normal that conditions be as favorable as they are today, nor should we imagine that they could not have been otherwise. We forget that the felicity of the present is actually the fulfillment of the promise of the past. The merciful quality of time causes us to forget the intensity of the anxiety of years past, when our ability to survive was in doubt. We are therefore obligated to an appreciation of our blessings as a special gift, as the keeping of God’s word, as the vindication of the covenant in which He promised us that Torah shall not depart from us or from our descendants. The experience of fulfillment lays upon us the obligation of humility, to realize that we are not necessarily deserving of what has come upon us, that we have not wrought our good fortune with our own hands and wisdom, that it is God in His goodness who keeps His Word to generations past and by virtue of which we now prosper. We must demand of ourselves the obligations that flow from our successes —the qualities of understanding, of perspective, of emunah, and above all, of a deep humility that the Higher Force has responded to our own initiative in molding Jewish history and keeping His promise, through us, to those who preceded us.

In the Aleinu, mishtachavim is followed by modim, modim as in thanks. But there is another meaning as well, one that holds the key to real leadership and one upon which I reflect at this important transition in my personal and professional life. Jacob’s blessing to his son Judah, Yehudah, attah yodukha achekha (Gen. 49:8) literally means “Judah, your brothers will recognize you (as their leader).” However, the word yodukha, they will recognize you, is etymologically related to the word vidui, confession and therefore teaches us that only those who can, like Judah, confess, are those who can be acknowledged as real leaders.

And it is to this I turn as I contemplate my response to allegations of abuse in the Yeshiva community. At the time that inappropriate actions by individuals at Yeshiva were brought to my attention, I acted in a way that I thought was correct, but which now seems ill conceived. I understand better today than I did then that sometimes, when you think you are doing good, your actions do not measure up. You think you are helping, but you are not. You submit to momentary compassion in according individuals the benefit of the doubt by not fully recognizing what is before you, and in the process you lose the Promised Land. I recognize now that when we make decisions we risk, however inadvertently, the tragedy of receiving that calamitous report: tarof toraf Yosef, “Joseph is devoured,” all our work is in vain, all we have put into our children has the risk of being undone because of a few well intentioned, but incorrect moves. And when that happens—one must do teshuvah. So, I too must do teshuvah.

True character requires of me the courage to admit that, despite my best intentions then, I now recognize that I was wrong. I am not perfect; none of us is perfect. Each of us has failed, in one way or another, in greater or lesser measure, to live by the highest standards and ideals of our tradition — ethically, morally, halakhically. We must never be so committed to justifying our past that we thereby threaten to destroy our future. It is not an easy task. On the contrary, it is one of the greatest trials of all, for it means sacrificing our very egos, our reputations, even our identities. But we can and must do it. I must do it, and having done so, contribute to the creation of a future that is safer for innocents, and more ethically and halakhically correct.

Biblical Judah was big enough to admit that he was small. He confesses a mistake. He can experience guilt and confront it creatively. After the incident with Tamar, he does not offer any tortured rationalizations to vindicate himself. He says simply and forthrightly: tzadkah mimmeni (Gen. 38:26), she was right and I was wrong. And with that statement Judah is transformed into a self-critical man of moral courage. He concedes guilt. He knows that he is guilty with regard to Joseph, and together with his brothers he says aval ashemim anachnu, “indeed, we are guilty.” Pushed to the limits of the endurance of his conscience, he rises to a new stature and achieves a moral greatness that is irrefrangible and pellucid.

This is what I am modeh as I reflect on my tenure. Tzadkah mimmeni. I hope that those who came forth and others who put their trust in me will feel that faith vindicated and justified. Modeh ani.

One might think it appropriate to mark the formal end of a career in avodat ha-kodesh with the recitation of Havdalah, the blessing which marks the end of the sacred period of holy days. Yet my whole career in avodat ha-kodeh has been one of havdalah.

Consider: When we recite this prayer, we bless God who distinguishes between sacred and profane, light and dark, Israel and the nations, Sabbath and weekday. Jewish practice calls for us to recite this havdalah on Saturday nights and at the end of holidays, not only over a cup of wine, but also during the Amidah of the evening prayer which marks the transition from holy-day to week-day. And the Talmud requires that the havdalah be recited specifically in the blessing which attah chonein la-adam da’at, in which we pray to the Almighty for the gift of wisdom and knowledge and understanding. What is the relevance of havdalah to this specific blessing? The Rabbis answer, “if there is no knowledge, whence the ability to distinguish?” In other words, the ability to discern between different values, to discriminate and to distinguish between competing claims, and therefore the ability to emerge whole from the confusions that reign in life, requires da’at— special insights and intellectual gifts.

And yet, if we examine the passage of the havdalah carefully, we remain with the question: why so? Apparently, it should be rather easy to make these distinctions. Any child can tell the difference between light and dark; reference to identity of the parents will tell us if one is Jewish or non-Jewish; the difference between the Sabbath and weekdays is nothing more complicated than consulting a calendar; and even the distinction between sacred and profane is not overly taxing — who cannot tell apart, for instance, a Sefer Torah from a novel? Why, then, the special requirement for da’at or knowledge, for intellectual graces, in order to perform havdalah?

The answer is that for those who are superficial or who dwell in only one realm, da’at is indeed unnecessary. If we associate only with kodesh (holiness), Israel, ore (light), and Sabbath, or only with hol (the profane), the nations, hoshekh (darkness), and weekday, it is easy to discern distinctions and life is much less confusing. The full atheist has few problems. There is little to confuse him. He swallows all of contemporary life, and therefore he has no difficulties in trying to tell apart its various strands. Similarly, at the other end of the spectrum, the Jew who does not step out of his self-imposed boundaries of the sacred, of Israel, of the light of Torah, rejects all that is new and secular and alien in the contemporary culture, and he too has little to confuse him.

However, da’at is needed and havdalah is vital for those of us who choose to live in both realms, Torah and Madda, and will reject neither —for those of us who opt both for light and darkness, for Israel and the nations, for Sabbath and weekdays, for the sacred and the profane.

This category describes most of us, who are known by the somewhat unfelicitous name “Modern Orthodox,” who will not succumb to the blandishments of the materialistic and hedonistic and atheist society, and yet refuse the easy comforts of intellectual ghettoization; who believe that the function and the mission of the Jew in the world is to illuminate the hoshekh (darkness); to sanctify the hol (profane); to bring the Jewish message to the nations; and to introduce the warmth and meaningfulness of the Sabbath to all the days of the week.

For us, who are involved in this great mission, that of Torah and that of Maddah, was the dictum of the Rabbis meant: im ein da’at, havdalah minayin. It is we, who straddle both worlds, who are therefore subject to the danger of confusion, and who therefore need the special divine gift of da’at or knowledge, insight, in order to be able to perform havdalah, always to distinguish between the light and the dark, even when we try to illuminate the shadows of life; to know what separates the holy and the profane, even when we try to consecrate the secular.

Educationally, the highest expression of this point of view is Yeshiva University. For Yeshiva is more than a university; it is truly a universe, a microcosm of the American Orthodox world — its vices and its virtues, its faults and its merits, its promises and its potentials, its currents and sub-currents. No other place in the world offers such a combination: a Yeshiva and a medical school, a Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary and a Stern College for Women; a Talmudic Kollel and a school of education.

The ideal of Yeshiva is: kiddush ha-hol, the sanctification of the profane and the illumination of the dark and the Judaization of the general. It is Yeshiva, therefore, which strives most mightily for that da’at to keep havdalah, to be able at all times to discern and distinguish, to avoid confusion in a terribly confusing world.

This vast educational complex, this “Yeshiva Universe,” is the vision of some of the greatest Jewish scholars of our and of past generations — and it is one which, because of the implied risks, constantly requires da’at and increasing havdalah in order to save our generation, and future generations, from confusion. May Yeshiva’s future be both gracious and powerful as it is led by my distinguished successor, President Richard Joel. He deserves the loyalty of all segments of our beloved institution — students, faculty, board members, and amkha.

And finally, a prayer for my family, my students, my colleagues, and my friends: Learn from my experiences, both positive and negative, to achieve success with grace and to face failure with dignity, to be prepared for the extreme periods of life’s challenges without hubris or despair, and never to stop hoping and expecting better news and better times. Above all, learn the importance of commitment to great and noble ideals even when it hurts and disappoints, but to trust that ultimately it will all prove worthwhile. I pray that you will always strive to live morally upstanding and spiritually fulfilling lives, marked by abiding loyalty to the principles of Orthodox Judaism, to Torah Umadda, along with respect for all people who honestly follow the dictates of their own beliefs and conscience even when such do not accord with your own deepest commitments, and to combine your love of God and Torah with love of all humans created in the image of God.

If in any way my life’s experience can encourage in you the aspiration to attain a modicum of wisdom; a trust in the faith in our ancestors’ spiritual strivings from Abraham through Moses through the giants of the sacred Jewish tradition; a measure of the value of the sweetness and intellectual excitement in the study of Torah; a desire to excel in the practice of mitzvot; the reassurance that ultimately character and Godliness are infinitely more ennobling and valuable than any worldly goods or social approbation; and the strength to hold fast and persevere through a life of havdalah – why, then, my life—and yours—will have proven worthwhile. Halevai!

Norman Lamm

Norman Lamm’s letter announcing departure from Yeshiva University Read More »

Egypt army gives Morsi 48 hours to share power

Egypt's armed forces handed Islamist President Mohamed Morsi a virtual ultimatum to share power on Monday, giving feuding politicians 48 hours to compromise or have the army impose its own roadmap for the country.

A dramatic military statement broadcast on state television declared the nation was in danger after millions of Egyptians took to the streets on Sunday to demand that Morsi quit and the headquarters of the ruling Muslim Brotherhood were ransacked.

Since the fall of Hosni Mubarak more than two years ago as the Arab Spring revolutions took hold, the Arab world's most populous nation has remained in turmoil, arousing concern amongst allies in the West and in Israel, with which Egypt has had a peace treaty since 1979.

Morsi's backers were furious at the military statement: “The age of military coups is over,” said Yasser Hamza of the Brotherhood parliamentary wing.

But it provoked delight among liberal leaders and crowds in Cairo's Tahrir Square, who cheered when a flight of military helicopters swooped overhead trailing national flags. Silhouetted against the sunset, it was a powerful illustration of the military's desire to be seen in tune with the people.

“If the demands of the people are not realized within the defined period, it will be incumbent upon (the armed forces) … to announce a road map for the future,” chief-of-staff General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi said in the statement that was followed by patriotic music.

The people had expressed their will with unprecedented clarity in the mass demonstrations and wasting more time would only increase the danger of division and strife, he said.

The army said it would oversee the implementation of the roadmap it sought “with the participation of all factions and national parties, including young people”, but it would not get directly involved in politics or government.

Anti-Morsi demonstrators outside the presidential palace cheered the army statement, and the main opposition National Salvation Front, which has demanded a national unity government for months, applauded the military's move. The army is held in high regard, especially after it helped topple Mubarak.

On Cairo's Tahrir Square, thousands were celebrating the army's move: “We want a new armed forces council to govern until new elections,” said accountant Mohamed Ibrahim, 50. “The army alone supports the legitimate revolutionary will of the people.”

“The invitation to meet the demands of the people within the next few hours is a historic opportunity which should not be lost,” said Amr Moussa, a liberal politician and former foreign minister who stood in last year's presidential election.

There was no immediate reaction from the president's office.

It was the second time in just over a week that the armed forces had issued a formal warning to the politicians, piling pressure on Morsi to concede power-sharing with the liberal, secular and left-wing opposition.

Analysts said the military intervention could serve Morsi if he wished to compromise, but it risked giving his opponents an incentive to harden their demands, sensing support from the street and the generals, at the risk of triggering a coup.

“The ultimatum has the ring of a potential coup,” said Yasser al-Shimy of the International Crisis Group think-tank.

“What makes it not a coup is it gives time for the politicians to sort out their differences.”

The second biggest Islamist group in parliament, the Nour Party, said it feared the return of army rule “in a big way”.

The armed forces have played an important role in Egyptian politics since army officers staged the overthrow of the monarchy in 1952.

SELF-DEFENCE?

After the destruction of its offices, the Brotherhood which operated underground until the overthrow of Mubarak in 2011, said it was considering how best to defend itself.

Sunday's mass rallies were bigger than anything seen since the Arab Spring uprising. Smaller crowds returned to Tahrir Square and other gathering points on Monday afternoon.

Five non-Brotherhood government ministers tendered their resignations from the cabinet, apparently in sympathy with the protesters, underlining a sense of isolation for the party that won a series of elections last year.

“Both sides are still in their trenches,” a senior European diplomat said just before the military statement.

Eight people died in a night of fighting around the Brotherhood building, where guards fired on youths hurling rocks and fire bombs. A Brotherhood official said two of its members were hurt. Another eight people were killed and 731 injured in clashes around the country on Sunday, the health ministry said.

The Brotherhood's official spokesman told Reuters that the attack had crossed a red line of violence and among possible responses might be to revive “self-defense committees” former during the 2011 uprising.

“The people will not sit silent,” Gehad El-Haddad said.

Morsi's movement complained at the lack of police protection, which can only heighten its sense of being under siege from both the liberal opposition and state officialdom inherited from the old regime.

Protesters opposing Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi at Tahrir Square in Cairo on July 1. Photo by Suhaib Salem/Reuters

NOT TALKING

Liberal protest organizers, who declared Morsi ousted by people power on Sunday, said they hoped people would stay in the streets until Morsi left.

Morsi, who has not appeared in person, earlier renewed offers via allies of dialogue and pledged to work with a new parliament if disputes over election rules can be ironed out. But he has so far offered no substantial concessions.

The opposition does not trust the Islamist movement, which critics accuse of using a series of electoral victories to monopolize power. They want a total reset of the rules of a democracy imperfectly worked out over the past two years.

The massive protests showed that the Brotherhood has not only alienated liberals and secularists by seeking to entrench Islamic rule, notably in a new constitution, but has also angered millions of Egyptians with economic mismanagement.

Tourism and investment have dried up, inflation is rampant and fuel supplies are running short, with power cuts lengthening in the summer heat and motorists spending hours fuelling cars.

The cost of insuring government debt against default surged to record highs. Forward contracts indicated a significant fall for the pound against the dollar.

Some uniformed policemen marched among protesters in Cairo and Alexandria, chanting “the police and the people are one”, and several senior officers addressed the Tahrir Square crowd.

Adding to the failure to protect the Brotherhood headquarters, that cast doubt on whether Morsi could rely on the security forces to clear the streets if he gave the order.

The United States and the European Union have urged Morsi to share power with the opposition, saying only a national consensus can help Egypt overcome a severe economic crisis and build democratic institutions.

U.S. President Barack Obama renewed a call for Morsi and his adversaries to cooperate, just as Sisi's statement was made.

The Pentagon, which funds the Egyptian army heavily, said it could not speculate on what was about to happen in Egypt.

Military helicopters fly above Tahrir Square while protesters opposing Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi shout slogans against him and Brotherhood members during a protest in Cairo on July 1. Photo by Mohamed Abd El Ghany/Reuters

Reporting by Asma Alsharif, Alexander Dziadosz, Shaimaa Fayed, Maggie Fick, Alastair Macdonald, Shadia Nasralla, Tom Perry, Yasmine Saleh, Paul Taylor and Patrick Werr in Cairo; Writing by Paul Taylor; Editing by Alastair Macdonald and Giles Elgood

Egypt army gives Morsi 48 hours to share power Read More »

Israeli who murdered his parents used tips he found online

An Israeli who stabbed his mother and father to death was convicted of murder on Monday partly because he searched online for tips including “how to kill your parents and get away with it.”

Daniel Maoz, 29, wanted money from his inheritance in order to pay heavy gambling debts, the Jerusalem District Court found. He was sentenced to life imprisonment for the 2011 murders.

The case presented an unusual challenge to the prosecution: DNA evidence linking Maoz to the killings was found at the murder scene, his parents' apartment, and he tried to explain that away by accusing his identical twin brother of the crime.

In its decision, the court cited other physical evidence and an examination of the defendant's computer to refute that.

The incriminating Internet searches also included “can soap clean DNA from a knife?” and “murder for inheritance”, a transcript of the ruling showed.

Maoz said he made the searches out of “academic curiosity.”

Reporting by Jeffrey Heller; Editing by Louise Ireland

Israeli who murdered his parents used tips he found online Read More »