One Israeli Creation for the Weekend
To describe Yoni Rechter in one paragraph would be impossible. Rechter is a brilliant musician and composer. His musical style, combining Jazz, Blues and classical Rock, created many songs so beautiful, they make the listener speechless. When I listen to Rechter's melodies, which really take over the lyrics, butterflies fill my stomach and my heart begins to dance.
Rechter became famous in the 70's, when playing the keyboard for the humoristic rock band- Kaveret. He later formed the progressive rock duo- “14 Octaves”, along with Avner Kanner. Throughout the years, he wrote and composed songs for leading Israeli singers. He also composed the song that many Israelis consider “best Israeli song of all times-” Atur Mitz'chech (Your Forehead is Ornamented.) In 1978, Rechter composed the songs for Ha'Keves Ha'Shishah Asar (The Sixteenth Sheep,) a very famous album containing poems and songs for children, on which many generations grew up on (and still do.) In 1991, the Israel Festival and the Israeli Broadcasting Authority produced an evening of Rechter songs titled “Ha'Ikar Ze Ha'Romantika” (The Most Important Thing is Romance) which aired on Israeli broadcast television and was later released as an album.
This is merely the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Rechter, but when it comes to music, the best thing would be to simply close your eyes and listen.Even if you don't know a single word in Hebrew, you must tune in and listen to his brilliant, brilliant music. Enjoy!
Ha'Retzinut Hi Mimeni Va'Hala'a (Seriousness is beyond me)
December 28, 2012
In-depth
US can walk and chew gum at the same time
Even with its pivot toward the East, the US will still be playing a key role in the Mideast writes Leon Panetta in Gulf News.
Some argue that instability and turmoil in the Middle East will prevent us from implementing the rebalance. Our new defence strategy and budget makes clear that it will not. The US military is a global force that can walk and chew gum at the same time. Even as America rebalances towards the Asia-Pacific region, it will retain a significant presence in the Middle East to deter aggression and promote stability.
The Women and the Wall Between Israel and the Diaspora
Diaspora Jews must understand the politics behind the treatment of non-Orthodox Jewish rituals in Israel, writes Jonathan S. Tobin in Comementary Magazine.
In the United States, where the Orthodox remain a minority in the Jewish community—albeit the only one that is growing rather than shrinking in terms of population—the treatment of Reform and Conservative Judaism in Israel remains a source of anger and puzzlement. To many American Jews, the fact that Reform and Conservative rabbis and congregations in Israel are not given the same support as those of the Orthodox seems to be an expression of pure bias. The relegation of the Women of the Wall to an out-of-the-way section of the Wall known as Robinson’s Arch for their prayer services is viewed as a contradiction of the country’s purpose as the homeland of all of the Jewish people.
Daily Digest
- Times of Israel: Election frenzy hits Israeli university campuses
- Haaretz: Lieberman: 'We are eagerly anticipating' Abbas' resignation
- Jerusalem Post: Poll: Likud-Beytenu in free fall
- Ynet: Opportunity in E1 siege
- New York Times: Iran’s Slowing of Enrichment Efforts May Show It Wants a Deal, Analysts Say
- Washington Post: Retired Gen. Schwarzkopf dies at 78
- Wall Street Journal: Mubarak Is Returned to Hospital
Follow Shmuel Rosner on Twitter and Facebook for facts and figures, analysis and opinion on Israel and the U.S., the Jewish World and the Middle East
Polls: Netanyahu set to win Israel election but rightists gain
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud party is set to win a parliamentary election on January 22 although the popularity of a far-right party opposed to Palestinian statehood is growing, polls showed on Friday.
Two out of three surveys showed the right-wing Likud losing voters to political newcomer Naftali Bennett's religious party Bayit Yehudi (Jewish Home)and to a fractured center-left bloc.
All still predicted a strong right-wing coalition emerging in the 120-seat parliament, which would assure Netanyahu another term.
The daily Yedioth Ahronoth published a poll with Likud winning 33 seats, four less than a month ago. A poll in the Jerusalem Post showed Likud fell to 34, down from 39 just two weeks ago. A survey by Maariv said Likud held ground at 37.
Without a majority in parliament, Likud would have to join forces with other parties to form a government. Netanyahu could choose Bennett and ultra-Orthodox religious parties or team up with members of the center-left bloc.
The left-leaning Labor party remained in second place in all the polls, winning 17 or 18 seats.
Bennett's party platform rejects a two-state solution with the Palestinians and is staunchly in favor of settlement building in the occupied West Bank – an issue which has stalled peace talks.
All the polls show him on an upward trend, winning between 12 and 14 seats.
Reporting by Ari Rabinovitch; Editing by Angus MacSwan
Polls: Netanyahu set to win Israel election but rightists gain Read More »
Q&A: ‘Whether Israel attacks Iran or not, the decision-making process was sound’
Charles Freilich, a senior fellow at Harvard University's Kennedy School and former deputy national security adviser for the Israeli government, discusses his new book, Zion's Dilemmas: How Israel Makes National Security Policy.
In your book you write that “Israel’s DMP (decision making process) is increasingly inadequate to the demands placed on it by the nation’s extraordinarily difficult external circumstances”. Can you please give one or two examples where a better “process” might have led to a better decision?
The cases where a better process might have led to a better decision are legion, but to give just a couple of examples, the Lebanon wars in 1982 and 2006 were clearly cases where a better process might have significantly increased the prospects of Israel actually achieving its objectives at the time. In both cases the objectives were very poorly defined and so not surprisingly, only partially achieved. In the case of the Gaza disengagement, Sharon decided first that he wanted to withdraw and only then, after making the fundamental decision, turned to the National Security Council to help him develop the concept behind it. The NSC asked for a couple of weeks to suggest alternative policies that might have better achieved the objectives Sharon set out, but he simply refused to even consider this. There are many, many more examples.
But is Israel's problem really a “mechanical” DMP problem, or a more elusive problem of lack of leadership?
For the most part, I believe that Israel has had relatively strong leaders in recent decades – Rabin, Peres, Barak, Sharon, even Olmert – and each of them launched daring peace initiatives and in some cases major military ones as well. The fundamental problem is that Israel has been undergoing a political crisis in recent decades, the ongoing divide regarding the future of the West Bank, with policy oscillating back and forth between moderate/dovish governments and more hardline ones, but the problem has not really been one of leadership. Having said that, I believe that the leaders could have derived great benefit from a far better decision-making process. This is not “mechanical”. While it is true that a good process does not by any means guarantee a better outcome, it should certainly increase the prospects of this happening. If one does not accept this fundamental axiom, it makes no difference how one goes about making decisions.
You constantly complain in your book that a “politicized” process makes it harder for the PM to make the decisions. In your words in just one of the chapters: “An inherent result of the coalition system, the weakness of the premier’s office has been a growing problem in recent decades, as party coherence has further diminished and the overall politicization of the DMP has increased”. But is it not a common feature for government bureaucrats to blame “politicians” for mixing politics with policy, when in fact the essence of democratic politics is the insertion of politics into the policy making process?
Politics are an integral part of the process in all countries and are actually a good thing; politics are how we, as the citizens of a democracy, turn the diverse opinions of some 8 million people into a final policy choice, so I have no problem with politics per se. The problem is the degree of politicization in Israel. In presidential systems, the president is guaranteed a full four-year term and is far more capable of leading the nation in chosen directions, again with clear political limitations. In other parliamentary systems leaders also enjoy greater power and longevity in office than in Israel. The problem in Israel is that the proportional representation system has played out in a way that leads to great instability, prime ministers are fighting for their political lives from the moment they are elected and have to invest inordinate efforts to ensure their very political survival and to get approval for their preferred policies. The Prime Minister in Israel has absolutely minimal formal authority – his formal prerogatives are almost nonexistent compared to other leaders – and so his ability to lead is almost entirely a function of his political skills and his political clout at any given time. In Israel's coalition governments the criterion for decision-making is not what is judged to be the best policy, in terms of Israel's overall national benefit, but the lowest common denominator, “what will fly”, what will gain minimal cabinet approval, not the best solution.
Of all the many faults that you find in Israel's system – among them “feudal fiefdoms”, “groupthink”, “faulty information processing” – what changes are realistic and feasible in the current political atmosphere?
What we really need is fundamental electoral reform, but that is not going to happen for the foreseeable future, probably not for long time. Given that that is the case, what is needed is to strengthen some of the civilian national security bureaucracies, first and foremost the National Security Council and the Foreign Ministry, so that they can present alternative options to those now presented virtually solely by the IDF. The IDF usually does great work, but no government should ever be dependent on only one source of policy recommendations. In addition to this reform, the inter agency process can and should be improved.
Can you give an example of a decision that was well-planned and executed, and explain why the one you picked stands out as an exemplary outlier?
I will give you two very different ones. Barak’s decision-making process leading up to the Camp David Summit with the Palestinians and then to the Clinton Parameters was very good, all issues were studied in depth, objectives and priorities defined, alternative options for achieving them explored exhaustively. Unfortunately, the result was a tragic collapse of the peace process, but this was because it takes “two to tango” and even the best decision-making process is dependent on the behavior of the other side. Paradoxically, Begin’s decision-making process leading up to the Camp David Summit with Egypt in 1978 was abysmal, but nonetheless led to a very good outcome. The second example of a good process is, I believe, regarding the Iranian nuclear program. Whatever the Israeli government ultimately decides to do, attack or not attack, the decision will be very controversial, some will believe it to be grossly misguided in any event, but this will not be for lack of a good process. I can think of no other case in which more exhaustive consideration has been given to every aspect of the issue, objectives and priorities more carefully defined, and options explored.
All in all, and considering the many achievements of Israel, do you think its decision making process is exceptionally problematic when it is compared to similar processes and achievements of other countries?
There is no doubt that Israel is a national success story by virtually every measure, social, economic, political and military. We have a great deal to be very proud of. In many areas the failings of the Israeli decision-making process are very similar to those found in other countries, including the US, which probably has the most sophisticated decision-making process of any country. I have no doubt that any student of American, British or French government would find much of what I write in the book about Israel quite familiar. The problem, however, is that we can simply not afford to allow ourselves to be like everyone else – the threats Israel faces remain daunting and just as we have achieved operational excellence, we must also achieve decision-making excellence. We owe it to ourselves and can demand no less. The criticisms of the process in the book – and there are many – stem from an abiding love for Israel and consequent desire to contribute something to improving our national security.
Q&A: ‘Whether Israel attacks Iran or not, the decision-making process was sound’ Read More »
Muslim Brotherhood tops Simon Wiesenthal Center anti-Semite list
Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood produced the worst anti-Semitic and anti-Israel slurs this year, according to the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
The Center topped its annual “Top Ten Anti-Semitic/Anti-Israel Slurs” list with a quote from Mohammed Badie, a Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader who lamented “Jewish control” and ”spreading of corruption on earth,” and recommended “holy Jihad” as a remedy.
Also quoted in the entry was Futouh Abd al-Nabi Mansour, a cleric affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood who called on Allah to “destroy the Jews and their supporters” in a sermon delivered in the presence of Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in October.
Second on the list was the Iranian regime.
Brazilian cartoonist Carlos Latuf was third for a cartoon showing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu squeezing votes into a ballot box out of the cadaver of a Palestinian child.
Soccer-related anti-Semitism occupied the fourth slot, followed by Ukraine’s Svoboda party, whose leader Oleg Tyagnibok assailed what he termed a “Muscovite Jewish Mafia.”
The sixth and seventh slots went to Greece’s Golden Dawn party and Hungary’s Jobbik, respectively. Norway and its royal house were in the eighth spot for awarding a medal to the Trond Ali Linstad, a Muslim educator and physician who has in his writings denounced the spread of “Jewish influence”. The medal was later withdrawn.
Number nine went to Jakob Augstein, a German publicist who in Der Spiegel accused Netanyahu of exploiting the “Jewish lobby” in the United States and Germany’s Nazi past to “keep the world on a leash.”
Louis Farrakhan occupied the last slot, and was quoted as saying in October: “Jews control the media. They said it themselves… In Washington right next to the Holocaust museum is the Federal Reserve where they print the money. Is that an accident?”
Muslim Brotherhood tops Simon Wiesenthal Center anti-Semite list Read More »
Report: Ron Dermer to become Israel’s ambassador in U.S.
Ron Dermer, an adviser to Israeli Prime Minister Bejamin Netanyahu, is set to replace Michael Oren as Israel's ambassador to the United States, an Israeli newspaper reported.
The daily Makor Rishon on Friday reported that Oren has requested to end his tenure in the spring of 2013, when he will have completed a four-year tenure.
Dermer, who immigrated to Israel from Florida in 1998, has served under Netanyahu as senior adviser in the Prime Minister’s Bureau since 2009, where he acted as liaison to the White House, the paper reported.
Several Israeli media said the Prime Minister’s Bureau and the Prime Minister’s Office declined to comment on the article.
Report: Ron Dermer to become Israel’s ambassador in U.S. Read More »
My First Christmas
When my girlfriend invited me to church on Christmas Eve I hid under the kitchen table hoping she would not find me. She did, however. With no way out, I agreed to celebrate Christmas for the first time. If Jesus could make a sacrifice, I could too.
I didn't go home for Hannukah so it was nice to join my girlfriend's family during the holidays. As a token of my appreciation, I presented her parents with a Rosenblum Shiraz, the Jewiest red I could find. Her dad fixed me a wonderful dirty martini which I drank near the Christmas tree marveling at the many sparkling ornaments.
“Who is the Angel?” I asked. “And how does she know Jesus?”
I felt the man of the hour's presence in the family room as I studied the nativity scene. What a scene it was with lots of Christianity taking place. I embraced the holiday spirits and got reacquainted with my girlfriend’s sister home from Stanford. At the dinner table my girlfriend led grace. I did not thank the Lord, but did thank my girlfriend's mother. We all drank two glasses of wine during dinner and quickly grew tired as a result of the wine and the tryptophan from the turkey. I was hoping we would all fall asleep and miss church. Everyone pulled through except for me.
As we took our seats a great thirst took hold of me. Desperate for a glass I nearly drank the holy water. Chewing gum helped for the moment until I saw the altar boys march through the aisles wearing white robes and waving flags in a scene reminiscent of KKK rally. I nearly choked until I saw a purple flag and remembered there are no gay Klan members. Once the music set in I felt more at ease. A sucker for Christmas music, I joined in song during “Hark the Harold Angels Sing.” The actual version seemed different than the version I sang to my girlfriend leading up to Christmas. The real words to the carol are not “Holy is the Jesus night.”
Before communion, the majority of my row knelt to the ground. I sat up straight and felt prayer books flicking the back of my head. At least I was the tallest person in my row for half a minute. I remained seated during communion next to my girlfriend’s sister. I gave her a fist bump for staying back.
After communion, Pastor Ed Bacon delivered a powerful sermon centered on ending gun violence in the wake of the tragedy at Sandy Hook. He thanked the many congregants and guests and even folks of different faiths for attending. So moved by his graciousness, I put $3 in the basket, the most I donated all year to any religion. I even sang the final carol the “First Nowell” extra loud, or especially off key, according to my girlfriend. I survived church and could hardly contain my excitement for opening presents under the tree on Christmas morning.
Attempting to pull my car into the driveway for the night I could not turn the steering wheel. It was locked. I tried again and slammed on the break as the car slid down the hill. No luck restarting the car. Was God punishing me for going to church?
“We'll call AAA tomorrow after we finish opening the presents,” my girlfriend announced. The sheer number of presents under the tree amazed me. We needed to call AAA to help us open presents. We sat by the fire opening gifts. We ate breakfast and then opened more gifts. Gift giving was seamless. I only gave one gift to my girlfriend's sister that was in fact intended for my girlfriend. I received new bed sheets, kitchen utensils, personalized stationary and a brand new edition of Monopoly and later a new battery from AAA.
My girlfriend appreciated the gifts I gave her, a lot more so than the Hannukah collection of TJ Maxx toiletries with the price tags still on. Towards the end of the holiday we christened my new Monopoly game. I moved in on properties aggressively snagging Broadway and Park Place early in the game. I dominated the board and became the Jewish property owner collecting rent from everyone on Christmas.
For a first timer, I think I behaved pretty well on Christmas. There was no real reason to hide under the kitchen table. It's not like Easter.
My First Christmas Read More »
Former Israel national soccer coach Emanuel Sheffer dies at 88
Emanuel Sheffer – the coach who led Israel to their only World Cup finals in Mexico in 1970 – died on Friday aged 88, the Israel Football Association said.
German-born Sheffer was described by Israeli FA chairman Avi Luzon as “the greatest of all Israeli coaches whose influence on the Israeli game and its development was decisive”. He also led Israel to the quarter-finals of the 1968 Olympic tournament.
A tough taskmaster who put a strong emphasis on physical fitness, Sheffer was credited by one of his charges for replacing old-style amateur practices with a far more professional approach.
“He was an innovator and insisted on three training sessions every day with demands that I don't know if today's players would even be able to withstand,” said Yitzhak Shum, who played under Sheffer in Mexico and went on to become a top coach.
Writing by Ori Lewis, editing by Mark Meadows
Former Israel national soccer coach Emanuel Sheffer dies at 88 Read More »
Ripping Off the Rabbi
By Rabbi Mark Borovitz
My day has gotten even crazier than I last wrote about. I have had to deal with someone who left Beit T’Shuvah owing a lot of money—someone I had helped personally. She ripped a couple of other people off and now wants help. What do I do?
This is my struggle: I like the young woman and feel sorry for her. She has had many years of therapy and yet she continues to play the role of victim. She has used it against her family and everyone else that has tried to help her. The spiritual drain of helping her has taken away from my ability to help another. Yet, Redemption/T’Shuvah is always possible.
The last time she was here, I had to ask her to leave because she was working and not paying anything for rent/cost of care. While money is not held against anyone for entry to the program, not paying one’s rent when one is in Sober Living, is not Living Sober. We can’t be enablers; we can’t take the place of parents who have enabled prior to their children getting here. So, what do I do? I find myself getting angry with this young woman because she is making her screw-ups, her chaos and her destructive actions, my responsibility. This is an old pattern and I am not going to play. It is very difficult for me. I understand the actions but I can’t stand people I’ve invested time, energy and spirit in going against everything that is important in order to live well. I constantly struggle not to get angry and I find myself winning the battle more often than not. I also know that I do get angry, I am angry that I am put in this position. I am angry that I could not find the key to the soul of another to unlock their inner “Pintele Yid”, their innate decency and love for self and others.
My next call was from a family member of a homeless person who has a high IQ and is also schizophrenic. This man was complaining about the system that doesn’t help his brother. He was upset that he had to put a restraining order out on his brother because his brother could get violent with him and he was worried about his wife and children. He knew he was powerless and he couldn’t put this together with living a Jewish Life. “How come there is nothing we can do, Rabbi?” I shook my head, I was angry also at the way our system treats the mentally ill and homeless. I was angry that I also am powerless to help. I spoke to him about some possible solutions and am waiting for his brother or he to call me so I can talk to the man. Maybe, I can find the words that will unlock his soul to hope and being in the solution to his problems. I am praying this can happen.
The thing that brings both of these instances together is Powerlessness. I am not happy that I am powerless. I connect with God in these moments very deeply and powerfully. I realize the truth of Rabbi Heschel’s words about God after Cain slew Abel: “God should have been disgusted. He said, No, I will keep the human species alive. I’m waiting. Maybe someday there’ll be a righteous generation”…But He’s still waiting, waiting, waiting for a mankind that will live by justice and compassion. He’s in search of man.” I get upset, sad and angry that I/we are not in search of God. I get sad, upset and angry that we are not living by justice and compassion enough. I just get angry that I don’t/can’t do enough to make this happen. I hate powerlessness.
My struggle is that together, WE can find God. We can live a life and make a world full of Justice and Compassion. Yet, we don’t. We are too polarized, we are too indulgent in our own victimhood, and we are too consumed with our own selves to make this happen. This angers me because it is not just others, it is me too. I am part of the problem and the solution. I pray each day for more of the solution and less of the problem. I pray each day for the grace to accept the things I cannot change and the courage to change the things that should be changed. Please God, Please all of you, help me to know the difference and enact the changes to make us all more just and compassionate.
Ripping Off the Rabbi Read More »
Paul Rudd Q & A: ‘This is 40’
“There are a couple of Jewish jokes that I think are just great,” actor Paul Rudd said, eagerly, leaning forward on a couch at the Four Seasons Hotel, where he was recently promoting his new Judd Apatow film, “This is 40.” “This Jewish kid asks his dad, ‘Can I borrow $30?' And his dad says, 'Twenty dollars? What do you need $10 for?'” And Rudd – a startlingly boyish-looking 43 — throws his head back and laughs like a kid.
On YouTube you can check out a video of Rudd, when he really was a kid, decked out in a yellow tuxedo shirt, joking around and playing DJ at a bat mitzvah years before his performance in 1995’s “Clueless” made him a breakout star. Since then, Rudd’s become one of Hollywood’s go-to comic actors, especially for Apatow, who’s previously cast him in films like “Knocked Up,” “Forgetting Sarah Marshall” and “I Love You, Man,” starring Jason Segel.
In “This is 40” – Apatow’s comedy drama about mid-life angst, billed as a “sort of sequel” to “Knocked Up” — Rudd plays Pete, a lovably childlike Jewish record label owner, father and husband to Apatow’s real-life wife, Leslie Mann. Pete’s career and marriage are on the rocks; among other indignities, he’s appalled when the only reporter who turns up to interview his star client is from the Jewish Journal. (Thanks, Judd!) Pete is also caught avoiding his family while playing Internet Scrabble in the loo, farting in bed and urging wife Debbie (Mann) to check out a growth on his derriere.
“It was embarrassing to do a lot of those scenes,” Rudd admitted during our interview. “Look, I’m sitting on the toilet playing Internet Scrabble; I’m getting a hemorrhoid looked at – none of these things are fun to film. But if you’re going to try and make something comedic, you’ve got to throw vanity to the wind. I would never do those kinds of scenes just for the shock value, or if it wasn’t conducive to the story and the character. It’s not gratuitous comedy. Judd had said, ‘Let’s make a movie about marriage and the things that we fight about – kind of a real, warts and all view of it.’ And sometimes you do need to ask your wife if there’s something on your [backside].”
Here are further excerpts from our interview, when Rudd described growing up from the age of 10 in a very non-Jewish neighborhood in Kansas City, Kansas; how that helped turn him into a comedian, and why having your wife examine your tush can actually be kind of romantic.
Q: What was it like growing up Jewish in the Bible Belt?
A: I always felt a little bit like an outsider, not only because I was Jewish, but because my parents are European; they’re both from England. And we moved around a lot because my father worked for TWA; TWA’s hub was in Kansas City, which is how we ended up there. I didn’t go to a school where there were a bunch of Jewish kids, and I realized growing up that my way of not getting beaten up was to try and make people laugh — and to deal with any kind of trauma was to make people laugh. That’s still at work; it’s still very much part of my psyche.
I did kind of realize at a young age that if I made Jewish jokes about myself, that a lot of kids in my school would laugh, like harder than other stuff. I never quite realized that maybe that was a little messed up.
Q: Your character of Pete is nominally Jewish. What’s your own Jewish identity today?
A: My whole family is Jewish; my wife, Julie, is Jewish – there isn’t anyone in my family who isn’t Jewish. I was bar mitzvahed Reform; we were pretty laid back, but it’s like, oh yeah, I went to synagogue. I know what it’s like to look for matzoh (laughs). I know the culture and I know the food. I know what a Haggadah is! I know these things, and I did a play many years ago [in 1997] called “The Last Night at Ballyhoo,” which was a new play at the time, about Eastern European Jews and the anti-Semitism they faced by German Jews in the South. Alfred Uhry, the playwright, became somewhat of a surrogate father to me in New York – I live in New York still and he does, too. And every seder at Alfred’s house he would say, “You know, if you are Jewish, it almost doesn’t even matter how religious you are. If you’re Jewish, it’s just in the marrow of your bones.” We have a lineage that is so many thousands of years old, that you just relate. It is a tribe; it’s like, “Oh, yeah, that’s my team,” and I feel that for sure.
Q: You and your wife participated in conversations and videotaped improv to help create some of the situations in “This is 40.” What, if anything, from the movie, comes from your real married life?
A: Actually, there were more specifics in “Knocked Up.” When Judd was writing that movie, my wife once said, “I’m so sick of looking at your back,” because I was just on the computer all day, checking my fantasy football scores.
Q: You’re whispering right now. Is your wife in the next room?
A: No, but I’m certain that she can probably hear me somewhere (laughs).
Q: There’s a scene in “This is 40” where your character and a friend are fantasizing about their wives’ deaths and becoming sexy widowers.
A: Not that I would ever fantasize about my wife’s death, but I think everyone has those moments where you play out the death of your spouse — and I thought that could be funny but also incredibly raw and exposed and hopefully not offensive, though I’m sure it will come off that way to some people. It’s just [mining] the things you would never say, and then turning them into a conversation. You could create laughs about how attractive you would look to someone if you were in mourning (laughs). I know that sounds horrible.
Q: What about the hemorrhoid scene?
A: Sometimes in a real marriage, it’s about asking your wife to look at this and what does that look like? While it’s not traditionally romantic, I would say it’s arguably romantic in its intimacy. The idea that a couple can do that for each other is very romantic. I also think that in a strange way, being able to fart in front of each other – that’s a very sweet gesture! (Throws his head back, claps and laughs.)
Q: I heard you improvised farting in a scene in bed with Leslie Mann – and her character isn’t pleased.
A: We were doing that scene and I wasn’t going to fart, but I felt like I probably could at the moment. [Normally], you would never do that because anybody with any decency would never do that; you certainly wouldn’t ever do it when you’re shooting a scene in a movie. But again, it was that thing of well, that’s what marriage is. I also think farts are funny, just at a very basic level. I’m not trying to deconstruct that scene too much – farts are funny – but I do remember kind of deconstructing, if I do it, that’s what the movie is about, so why not, and just see what happens?
Q: You drew the line of having the hemorrhoid scene on the movie’s poster, however.
A: Yeah, I didn’t want it on the poster. But by the way, I wasn’t so excited when the poster we went with shows me sitting on the toilet, because you’re not seeing it in the grand scheme or the context of the movie. It’s not my proudest moment.
Q: How has starring in this film about a real-life marriage affected your own relationship with your wife?
A: It’s a little bit like couples therapy, except it’s happening in front of millions of people.
“This is 40” is now in theaters.
Paul Rudd Q & A: ‘This is 40’ Read More »