fbpx

July 5, 2012

A new kind of heroism

The dilemma faced by families in today’s health care environment when it comes to making end-of-life decisions is captured vividly in a June 24 article in St. Louis, Mo.’s daily online newspaper, STLToday.com. It tells the story of an 89-year-old woman who died two years ago after a six-month decline. The memory of having to decide when to withhold care and let her go still puts knots in the stomachs of her three children.

The woman, Althlee Williams, had midstage Alzheimer’s but was leading a comfortable life when she felt disoriented one morning and was brought to the hospital, an event that marked the beginning of Williams’ protracted decline. Over six months, her family pursued the treatment approach recommended by her doctors and a dozen specialists: CPR (twice), blood transfusions, a feeding tube, a breathing tube and more. The bill for this care — not out of the ordinary these days — approached $1.2 million, all covered by insurance and Medicare.

At each stage, Williams would ask, “What now? Is this going to help?”

“It was not a comfortable or peaceful death,” said one of Williams’ daughters, Teresa Rice Scurlock. “It was just prolonged.”

Like any loving family, the Williamses did not want to lose their mother any sooner than they had to. The care decisions they made, even as their mother fell into a coma, seem only natural to us, even heroic. For most Americans, stopping aggressive care for a loved one comes by another name: giving up.

“Fighting” for a patient by demanding every possible medical treatment, even as prospects for recovery dwindle, can add time to a life, but often at two profound costs: an astronomical medical bill, and final days spent in acute pain or unconsciousness, surrounded by antiseptic, chaotic hospital life.

We listen to doctors, who may see death as a medical failure. We listen to our own anxieties — will we be able to live with ourselves if we don’t do the utmost? And just what is the utmost?

The source we listen to least, it seems, is the patient. As the time of death grows near, people really do know it. Common signs include reports of “seeing” loved ones who have already died, or praying for God to “take” them. Althlee Williams knew it when she asked if her treatments would “help.” The answer was no — they couldn’t possibly. It was her doctors and children who couldn’t see what was before their eyes.

This week’s parasha, Balak, captures well the dilemma of “knowing and not knowing.”

In it, Balak, a Moabite king, hires Balaam, a sorcerer, to put a curse on the Israelite people. In one way, Balaam is a rare, enlightened man, able to hear the word of God louder than he hears his own thoughts. God speaks words through him, invades his dreams and tells him what to do.

But Balaam is far from enlightened in how he treats his donkey. As he rides to fulfill Balak’s order, God stations an angel with a sword before him. The donkey sees the angel and ducks, swerves and finally lies down. Balaam beats her at each turn. Only after the donkey speaks to him, protesting his assault, does God uncover Balaam’s eyes and reveal the angel.

The Talmud, in Sanhedrin 105, says Balaam is like a man with one eye. Chasidic Rebbe Mordechai of Neshkhiz understood this to mean that Balaam had enough vision to see the greatness of God, but not enough to see his own limitations. It’s not enough to know God, to follow God, even to speak God’s words. God’s peace, God’s knowing, must guide our every thought and action.

Much education is needed if Americans are going to shift to a more peaceful understanding of death — and if Medicare is going to stay solvent with the coming of the baby boomers to their final stages of life. In 2011, about 25 percent of all Medicare spending went to pay for the care of patients in their last year of life, according to a study by the Dartmouth Atlas Project. National health care costs approached $2.6 trillion in 2010 — a tenfold increase since 1980, according to the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services.

Instead of calling it “giving up,” why not see the decision to stop aggressive care and let a person spend their last days at home as a new kind of heroism or enlightenment, marked by the bravery to reject our doctors’ advice and our own angst, and go with what we know is true.

Instead of the kind of “open eyes” Balaam put up for sale to the highest bidder, we can follow King David’s approach in Psalm 119 (as translated by Nan Merrill): “Open my heart’s eye, that I may see the wondrous blessings of creation.”


Rabbi Avivah W. Erlick owns L.A. Community Chaplaincy Services (lacommunitychaplaincy.com), a referral agency for interfaith chaplains.

A new kind of heroism Read More »

Clinton to visit Egypt, Israel after Asia swing

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will visit Egypt this month for talks with the country’s a new Islamist president, and will follow that with a stop in Israel to discuss Middle East peace efforts, the State Department said on Thursday.

Clinton’s Mideast stops come at the end of a marathon trip that will start off in Paris on Friday with a meeting of the “Friends of Syria” group of Western and Arab nations that have sought unsuccessfully to curb the worsening Syrian crisis.

In Paris, Clinton will also meet Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to discuss the Middle East peace process, which U.S. officials have been trying to revive following the breakdown in direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians in late 2010.

She will then fly on to Tokyo for a conference on Afghanistan, followed by stops in Mongolia, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia as part of Washington’s broader effort to bolster ties with Asia as China’s power grows in the region.

Clinton will head to Cairo on July 14, becoming the most senior U.S. official to visit Egypt since Mohamed Morsi was sworn in as president on June 30, ending six decades of rule by former military men.

The State Department said Clinton’s two-day visit was intended “to express the United States’ support for Egypt’s democratic transition and economic development.” She is to meet senior government officials as well as civil society and business leaders and inaugurate the new U.S. consulate in Alexandria.

U.S. officials said Clinton was expected to meet Morsi during the trip, giving her a chance to make a personal assessment of the man Egyptians elected as their leader after the fall of former President Hosni Mubarak.

The United States has traditionally had close ties with Egypt’s military, and Washington sought to use this leverage to press the country’s ruling military council to make good on pledges to hand over power to a democratically-elected leader.

But Washington has also long been leery of the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood which Morsi represents, and has sought to ensure that his government will pursue a moderate course and uphold international agreements including Egypt’s 33-year-old peace treaty with Israel.

Clinton will wind up the trip in Israel on July 16-17, where she is to discuss the Middle East peace effort amid tentative signs that Israeli and Palestinian leaders are open to resuming some form of dialogue after months of stalemate.

Reporting By Andrew Quinn; Editing by Vicki Allen

Clinton to visit Egypt, Israel after Asia swing Read More »

Illustrator J.T. Waldman draws on Harvey Pekar’s ‘Not the Israel My Parents Promised Me’

The Avengers, Spider-Man, Superman, Batman … and Harvey Pekar?

Illustrators J.T. Waldman and Arlen Schumer captured the Jewish-American comic book experience as they delivered back-to-back lectures during the 47th annual Association of Jewish Libraries Convention on June 18. The eclectic discussions, eye-openers for some librarians in attendance, ranged from mainstream superheroes to alternative comics, such as Pekar’s “American Splendor.”

The convention, held June 17-20 at the Langham Huntington Hotel in Pasadena, gathered local Jewish authors and nearly 200 professional librarians from Jewish institutions nationwide.

“It’s an annual celebration of the authors that we read, we review, we catalog,” said Lisa Silverman, library director at Sinai Temple, which hosted the event. “We’re delighted to meet them in person.”

[Read a review of “Not the Israel My Parents Promised Me”:
Isarel in the eyes of Harvey Pekar]

During “My Pekar Years (2007-2012): Creating Comix and Exploring Judaism With ‘Our Man,’ ” Waldman chronicled how he was hired to illustrate Pekar’s last autobiographical graphic novel, “Not the Israel My Parents Promised Me” (Hill & Wang: $24.95).

Best known for his “Megillat Esther,” an intricate Arthur Szyk-style work published in 2005, Waldman befriended artist Dean Haspiel, illustrator of the 2006 Pekar graphic novel, “The Quitter,” during a Baltimore comic book convention. Haspiel advised Waldman, then a Hebrew teacher, to submit a manuscript to Pekar. Months later, on Thanksgiving Day 2007, Waldman got a call from Pekar promising “$20,000 to do a whole book.” He considered the 8:30 a.m. phone call a compliment.

“[Pekar] was always very selective with artists he chose for his comics,” Waldman said.

After two years of conversations with Waldman about the Jewish state, Pekar developed a script he tentatively titled “How I Changed My Mind About Israel.”

But just as their collaboration began to flourish, everything changed on July 12, 2010, Waldman said. “I got a text message from a friend: ‘Oh, my God! Go online!’ ”

Pekar, 70, had died.

“The reason I took the book is because I wanted to work with Harvey, and now he was gone,” said Waldman, who finished the graphic novel on his own.

The end result is a narrative that features Pekar, who grew up with Zionist parents, wrestling with the myths and realities of the Jewish state.

Waldman capped off his lecture with video of himself kibitzing with the characteristically grumpy “American Splendor” creator, pestering Pekar about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

“What you do is you stay out of there,” Pekar grumbled. “You don’t go populate it with thousands of people,” opining that occupation was not good for the Jews. “Even [Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon realized it.”

Where Waldman zigged with a singular look into his collaboration with Pekar, comic book historian Schumer, author of “The Silver Age of Comic Book Art,” zagged with an overview of the creation of the American superhero by Jews.

With “Super Jews: Past and Present,” Schumer presented an energetic, if well-traveled, assessment of significant Jewish visionaries and trends in the creation of the American superhero idiom — launched by the success of DC Comics’ Superman and Batman in the 1930s and rounded out at Marvel Comics in the 1960s by writer Stan Lee (born Stanley Lieber) and artist Jack Kirby (born Jacob Kurtzberg).

Swathed in a Superman cape, Schumer opened with a discussion about comics pioneer Max Gaines (born Maxwell Ginsburg), who in 1933 became the first publisher to “take [Sunday comic] reprints, fold them over and create the comic book.” In 1937, Detective Comics became the first comic composed of new material. And in 1938, Action Comics No. 1 changed the medium forever with the arrival of Superman.

“Superman starts out first as a comic strip, a realistic adventure-story character, [the serious] flip side of Popeye,” said Schumer, who noted how Christian and Jewish historians have co-opted Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster’s iconic superhero as, respectively, a Christ figure and an ersatz Moses. Superman also combines elements of David, Samson and Judah Maccabee, and Schumer traced the lineage of Superman, the Thing and Hulk to the golem myth.  

Other Jewish creators of superheroes mentioned during Schumer’s talk included writer Joe Simon and artist Kirby (Captain America), writer-artist Will Eisner (the Spirit), artist Bob Kane and writer Bill Finger (Batman), editor Julius Schwartz (Barry Allen’s Flash), artist Martin Nodell (Alan Scott’s Green Lantern), artist Gil Kane (Hal Jordan’s Green Lantern) and writer Arnold Drake (Deadman).

By the 1960s, Jewish talent, such as DC Comics’ Schwartz and Mort Weisinger as well as Marvel’s Lee and Kirby, had built the foundations of the comics industry just as the Warners, Goldwyns, Laemmles and Mayers had built Hollywood. Through media such as film and comics, Jews created the American Dream through the prism of their respective lower-class immigrant backgrounds and the promise of freedom through democracy, Schumer said.

“That was essentially the Jewish-American assimilationist dream,” he said. “And all of them kept their Jewishness behind closed doors, many changing their names. But, looking back at history, none could keep their Jewish ideals and principles from surfacing through their works.”

Schumer and Waldman will appear at San Diego Comic-Con, July 12-15. For more information, visit this article at jewishjournal.com.

Illustrator J.T. Waldman draws on Harvey Pekar’s ‘Not the Israel My Parents Promised Me’ Read More »

The big reveal: How design makes rehab more serene

Room 9500 is the bottom rung at Beit T’Shuvah, the first stop for male addicts newly arrived from prison, the hospital or the streets. Six rookies at a time inhabit this snug dormitory as they adjust to life in rehab. For years, 9500 marked a dark and dreary start toward recovery — its windows blocked by bunk beds and dressers, the blue carpet stained and shabby. Longtime residents have called their stint in the room an “initiation,” and not in a good way.

On a recent afternoon, Drew Marr and Nick Martinez found their initiation would be a lot more pleasant.

“Wow, this is awesome,” Martinez, 19, said as he stepped into a fully made-over space furnished with new storage cubbies and polished hardwood floors, designer bed linens and a fresh coat of muted teal paint. “I feel like I’m in a hotel.”

Martinez and Marr, 27, have interior designers Jenifer Porter and Kelley Edwards to thank. “We tried to create a calm, quiet space,” Edwards said. “This is such a crucial time for the residents. We wanted to open up the room and give them something classic and comfortable.”

Porter and Edwards are two of the 70 local designers who have renovated rooms at Beit T’Shuvah this year as part of a charitable effort to give the Los Angeles addiction treatment center a much-needed facelift. Over four months, teams of decorators donated their time, talent and supplies to transform the facility’s 40-plus primary-care rooms into havens they hope will aid residents as they strive for wellness.

Organized by Heidi Bendetson, a designer herself and founder of the nonprofit Designed From the Heart, with help from entrepreneur Rhonda Snyder, the dramatic makeover will be revealed to the public in an open-house fete on July 12.

The design project has been an unexpected gift for the landmark residential rehab and synagogue, said Rabbi Mark Borovitz, Beit T’Shuvah’s spiritual leader. And it couldn’t have come at a more apt time: The institution is celebrating its 25th anniversary.

“This project is in keeping with our mission of letting people know that they matter,” Borovitz said. “It’s a way of telling the residents, ‘Yeah, you’ve made mistakes. You’ve come here at the absolute bottom of your life, but don’t think that you don’t matter.’ It’s our statement of belief in them.”

Bendetson and Snyder pulled the enterprise together at almost no cost to Beit T’Shuvah, which is the only Jewish-run treatment center in the country. They enlisted designers through professional contacts and word-of-mouth, giving recruits only a loose set of criteria to guide their work: You must raise all the funds and materials for your room. The room must be durable enough to support a high turnover of residents. The style shouldn’t be too ritzy or over-the-top — it should be a place of respite for residents slogging through the tough first phases of sobriety.

“The main thing we said to them was we wanted it to be a comfortable space that was therapeutic, that’s good for healing,” Bendetson said. “I’ve been blown away by everything the designers did.”

Before the project began at Beit T’Shuvah’s Venice Boulevard campus in early March, the primary-care units, which each house two residents for four to six months at a time, hadn’t been updated since the center moved to its current home near Culver City in 1999. The bedrooms were dingy and disorganized, with drawings etched into the walls by a parade of former residents. The bathroom tiles were cracked and smeared with a stubborn patina of soap scum.

Facilities manager Craig Miller stripped out the old wiring and furniture, and epoxy-coated the shower stalls. Then the designers came in with their painters, contractors and friends to fashion the new installations.

The renovation was carried out in five blocks of about eight rooms each, while temporarily displaced residents bunked with their peers. In each room, designers had three weeks to complete their work. At the end of each three-week period, residents were welcomed back to their transformed living spaces amid a clutch of cameras clicking rapidly to capture their wide-eyed disbelief, their open mouths, their heartfelt exclamations of, “Oh my God!”

Karen Greenberg said she was “in awe” when she first stepped into her redesigned room two months ago. The powder-blue walls, seagrass carpet and capiz-shell chandelier reminded her of a seaside spa, she recalled.

Greenberg, 38, landed at Beit T’Shuvah in 2008 for a methamphetamine addiction. When she returned for another stay this year, she was given the same room. “It was so messy and chaotic, but I had to humble myself and accept it,” Greenberg said. “Then I found out they were going to redo it, and the designers were truly a blessing.”

Heide Ziecker, Sarah Moritz and Alex Fuller gave Greenberg and her roommate plenty of drawer space to hide the heaps of belongings strewn around the floor. Ziecker had custom storage beds built by Meridith Baer Home, where she works, and obtained two sleek, forest-patterned armchairs from Janus et Cie.

“This is a room that I can really call home,” Greenberg said. “It’s so peaceful and a safe space for us. It’s not easy being back here, but this room helps me get through my day.”

The residents aren’t the only ones to be touched by the experience. Ziecker said she felt privileged to have a hand in a project that could help change lives. “I’m so excited thinking about the people who are going to be in this room for years to come and how this might be a bright spot in an otherwise difficult struggle,” she said.

Bendetson said that’s how she felt when she participated in a similar charitable design project at Good Shepherd, a women’s homeless shelter downtown, in May 2011. Until that point, her career as an interior designer had been fairly standard. But after remaking a room for a woman she’d never met, she yearned for more work that would lift her spirits so profoundly.

“I was so moved that I thought, ‘This is what I want to do for the rest of my life — to get people together and bring them to places that need their help,’ ” Bendetson said.

She founded Designed From the Heart when the Good Shepherd project was over, and began searching for a Jewish organization that could benefit from a spruce-up. Snyder, a longtime friend who currently has a relative in treatment at Beit T’Shuvah, told Bendetson the unique healing center might be a good candidate.

But Bendetson had to chuck a few preconceived notions first. “I had to get over it being a rehab,” she recalled. “I thought, ‘Why should you redesign rooms for people in rehab? Isn’t it their fault that they’re here?’ I had to get past the stigma and understand what goes on here and what it’s like for them.”

When she and Snyder approached Borovitz, the rabbi warmed to the idea immediately. It was Harriet Rossetto, Beit T’Shuvah’s founder and CEO, who needed to be convinced.

“I didn’t really see what this was about — I didn’t have the vision,” said Rossetto, who is married to Borovitz. “I can see transformations in people, but I’m not so good at transformation of space.”

Gradually, she realized that a clean, professionally decorated room could have a big impact on the facility’s 145 residents. “It’s about supporting their internal changes with an external manifestation,” she said, marveling at the night-to-day makeover of room 9500. “That can make an enormous difference in the message they get on just the first day: ‘Here’s a place that values me and my serenity.’ ”

Through programming and at Friday night services — which are routinely packed with upwards of 300 attendees — Borovitz aims to boost the self-worth of those in recovery, he said. Telling residents they deserve a beautiful place to live instills a twofold sense of value, he added: Not only do they reap the benefits of a soothing environment, but also they’re able to feel the support and care of the larger Jewish community beyond the walls of Beit T’Shuvah.

“Many people go through life thinking, ‘What difference does it make what I do?’ When you think like that, using makes sense — escape makes sense,” he said. “But when you’re involved in your life, when you’re immersed in it, when you realize that you matter to other people, it gives you a different relationship with living. Our message to the residents and the designers’ message to the residents is just that: You’re important.”

As Beit T’Shuvah turns 25, Borovitz and Rossetto hope to deliver this message on a broader scale. Beit T’Shuvah’s leadership recently purchased the building next door and plans to break ground on a remodel next month that would create new office space, meeting lounges and a youth center, among other amenities. Its board is in the midst of a $25 million capital campaign to finance the expansion and finish upgrading the existing facility.

The center’s programs already stretch the boundaries of what is typically offered at traditional rehabs, and Borovitz is eager to grow the catalog further. Residents can take part in surf therapy, basketball, creative writing and photography classes, dance, yoga and even music lessons at their own recording studio. Beit T’Shuvah has a choir and stages musical theater productions each year. Staff members — 80 percent of whom have gone through treatment at Beit T’Shuvah themselves — encourage residents to find their “passion and purpose” in life through elective activities, career training, in-house internships and, last but not least, mandatory Torah study every day at 7 a.m., Borovitz said.

“This program is not only about not drinking or using — it’s about changing the way you live,” he said. “People come because they want to live well and help others live well.”

To that end, Bendetson didn’t want to limit participation in the design project to designers by trade. She wanted to extend the opportunity to anyone with the will and the means. “If they could afford to do it and they asked to do it, I said, ‘Go for it,’ ” she said. “Love and desire are what you need in a charitable situation like this. I called my nonprofit Designed From the Heart, and I really felt that’s what they were doing.”

Local businesses also got in on the spirit of generosity. Lewis Hyman Inc. of Carson donated nearly all of the window treatments for the rooms, Snyder Diamond in Santa Monica contributed hardware and light fixtures, and Lester Carpet Co.  in the Fairfax district provided several rooms’ worth of carpeting.

Renovating a room wasn’t cheap — most units, including materials and labor, cost $10,000 to $15,000 each, Bendetson estimated. But that didn’t dampen participants’ zeal.

“As hard a job as it was to raise the money, afterward everyone said, ‘If I could do this again, I’d do it in a heartbeat,’ ” she said.

Many of the decorators left personal gifts for the residents of their rooms, such as monogrammed mugs or leather-bound journals for them to record their thoughts. Writing desks are a staple in most units. One designer hung a full-size surfboard on the wall and placed surfing photography books on the dressers.

In Mike Sauer’s room, designer Jill Wolff set aside wall space for a meaningful detail — a bronze sculpture of a miniature man pulling himself up a rope. The metaphor is clear to Sauer as he struggles to shake a gambling addiction that emerged a few years after he got sober from drugs and alcohol.

“It seems like one addiction after another,” he said.

But Sauer, 25, said he found hope at his first Shavuot celebration at Beit T’Shuvah this year. “It was cool to stay up all night and have nothing to do with gambling or drinking or using,” he recalled. “Just being together as a community and getting wrapped in the Torah — it was a pretty powerful experience.”

Gently lit by a bedside lamp amid the rich chocolate tones of his new room, Sauer looked around and smiled. “This is an amazing place,” he said. “This is a good place to start the rest of my life.”

For more information about Beit T’Shuvah’s “Grand Reveal” open house, visit The big reveal: How design makes rehab more serene Read More »

Berman gaining pro-Israel, Jewish vote

Eve Kurtin didn’t intend to take a side in the race between Rep. Howard Berman and Rep. Brad Sherman.

In mid-2011, right around the time it became clear these two Jewish, pro-Israel Democrats would be running against one another for reelection in the newly drawn 30th Congressional District that includes her neighborhood of Mulholland Estates, Kurtin contributed $500 to each candidate’s campaign committee.

Then Sherman began criticizing Berman.

One TV ad from the Sherman campaign presented in a negative light the 163 foreign trips taken by Berman, the ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, during his nearly three decades in office. The same ad took Berman to task for “charging taxpayers $186,000 to lease a car,” a perk congressmen are entitled to, but of which Sherman has not availed himself. That sum, according to the Berman campaign, includes spending dating back to the 1980s.

“Really distasteful,” Kurtin said of Sherman’s attacks. “If it’s not a blatant lie, it is absolutely an insult and a distortion of the facts.” In May 2012, right around the time Sherman’s ad first aired, Kurtin donated an additional $1,000 to Berman.

A former president of Stephen S. Wise Temple, Kurtin was involved in getting her Reform synagogue more involved in the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC); Kurtin joins a chorus of prominent donors affiliated with pro-Israel groups who have rallied behind Berman.

Three former AIPAC presidents — Howard Friedman of Baltimore, Amy Friedkin of San Francisco and Robert Asher of Chicago — have donated to Berman. Other notable pro-Israel donors from across the country have given to Berman’s campaign at fundraisers headlined by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright as well as Dennis Ross, who served as an adviser to President Barack Obama on Middle East affairs.

Many prominent Jewish donors from around Los Angeles have donated to Berman as well, and among Jewish voters in the 30th District, Berman’s support also appears to be stronger than Sherman’s. In the June primary, Sherman finished 10 points ahead of Berman, with 41 percent of the vote, but among Jewish voters, Berman came out ahead, according to a study conducted by political consultant Paul Mitchell.

Many Jewish and pro-Israel donors have decided not to take a side in this battle between incumbents, and more than a few have written checks to both candidates. But as the campaigns look ahead toward November, some who might have stayed neutral are picking sides.

“Brad Sherman is a nice guy, I’ve supported him, but he’s just another vote,” said Larry Weinberg of Beverly Hills, who is considered the father of modern-day AIPAC. “Howard is not just a leader; he is perhaps the most influential leader in the House, as far as the U.S.-Israel relationship is concerned.”

Like others interviewed for this article, Weinberg was careful to mention that AIPAC does not rate or endorse candidates, and that he was speaking for himself, not for any organization.

In an interview with The Journal, Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, the founder of The Israel Project, came out in favor of Sherman, instantly becoming the most prominent pro-Israel voice to endorse Sherman to date. (Other Sherman supporters reached for this article were unwilling to speak on the record.)

Mizrahi doesn’t dispute Berman’s seniority; indeed, she thinks his stature has cowed donors into supporting him.

“The fact is that Howard Berman has tremendous power, and sometimes people are afraid to speak truth to power,” Mizrahi said.

Mizrahi recently stepped down after 10 years as president of The Israel Project to launch her own public relations and government affairs firm. Mizrahi said she was speaking only as an individual and not for the global Israel advocacy organization she founded.

Mizrahi is a close friend of Sherman, and Sherman established The Israel Project’s board of advisers, of which Berman has since become a member. Mizrahi said she prefers Sherman’s policies vis-à-vis Israel —specifically on Iranian sanctions and on the strategies that might lead to a peaceful two-state resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict — over Berman’s.

“I can tell you, as someone who cares deeply about peace in the Middle East, that it’s time for new leadership,” Mizrahi said. “Brad Sherman would be a better chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee should the Democrats come back into power.”

If Sherman wins in November, attaining Berman’s spot on the Foreign Affairs Committee will not be automatic. Rep. Eliot Engel of New York has also said he would vie for the role of chairman, or ranking Democrat, should the Republicans maintain their majority in Congress.

Donna Bojarsky, an unpaid adviser to the Berman campaign, wondered whether Sherman is qualified for the committee position.

“When Israelis come to town, Howard gets the call,” she said, adding that when Israel’s Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz visited Washington, D.C., in June, the only Congressional office he visited was Berman’s.

“Brad isn’t even in any of those rooms,” Bojarsky said. “How does he want to be chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee if he doesn’t have any of the necessary relationships or experience?”

While Berman backers are far more likely to cite his style of diplomatic, behind-the-scenes deal-making as a reason he won their support, Sherman’s supporters appreciate what they see as Sherman’s much more public — and some say aggressive — approach.

By way of illustration, Sherman supporters regularly point to each congressman’s record regarding Iranian sanctions.

Berman sponsored the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act of 2010, a bill that instituted multilateral sanctions targeting companies that support Iran’s energy sector and against financial institutions that support Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. To get it passed, Berman worked with the Obama administration to ensure that Russia and China joined the group of participating nations.

But the way Sherman supporters like Mizrahi see it, Sherman first began putting forward bills and amendments to strengthen sanctions on Iran as early as 2005. Berman’s sanctions bill — which Sherman has argued was unnecessarily delayed — was, according to Mizrahi, composed of legislative ideas that originated in bills and amendments proposed by other lawmakers, including Sherman.

And for Jarrow Rogovin, an L.A.-based manufacturer of dietary supplements who is a high-level AIPAC donor, a member of the Republican Jewish Coalition and a longtime Sherman supporter, Berman is responsible for delaying the imposition of sanctions against Iran.

“When Iran gets a nuclear bomb,” Rogovin said, “it will be a monument to Howard Berman and Barack Obama.”

Berman gaining pro-Israel, Jewish vote Read More »

After barring anti-Islam activist, Federation reconsiders events policy

In the aftermath of its June 24 decision to bar conservative blogger and anti-Islam activist Pamela Geller from delivering a speech at its Wilshire Boulevard headquarters, The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles is crafting a new policy for non-Federation-sponsored events at the building.

In addition to considering the “procedural” question of how Federation staff will oversee the approval of such events, Chairman of the Board Richard Sandler said Federation leadership will also engage a second, more “substantive,” question about “the criteria you use to decide whether or not this is an appropriate event to go on in this particular building.”

The process will necessarily involve serious consideration of core questions about Federation’s role in serving Los Angeles’ Jews.

“I look at things from the point of view of what is our goal as a Federation?” Sandler said. “What is our mission? What is our responsibility to the community?”

The Geller event was sponsored by the Western Region of the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), a tenant at the Federation building only since late 2011. Following current policies, ZOA executive director Orit Arfa reserved a board room in the building at 6505 Wilshire Blvd. for the Sunday morning event, titled “Islamic Jew-Hatred: The Root Cause of the Failure to Achieve Peace.” She did so on June 6, almost three weeks in advance of the event. ZOA also arranged for an announcement of the ZOA-sponsored event to be posted on The Federation’s official Web site.

The criticism of Geller’s scheduled appearance at Federation’s headquarters from Muslim civil rights groups that, together with other faith-based groups, issued a joint statement condemning Federation came just one day before the event was to take place. Hours before the event was to begin, Federation officials informed ZOA that Geller would not be allowed to enter the building, citing concerns about the possibility of protests and counter-protests at the building on Sunday morning right at the time when the Zimmer Children’s Museum has its greatest amount of traffic.

When the revocation of Geller’s invitation to speak was announced on Sunday morning, the approximately 30 would-be attendees protested outside the building, accusing Federation of stifling free speech. The event was later moved to The Mark on Pico Boulevard.

Although it appears to have fallen into disuse, Federation did at one time have a policy governing the kinds of speakers who would be invited to speak at its headquarters, according to Steven F. Windmueller, professor emeritus of Jewish Communal Service at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, who led the Los Angeles Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC) from 1985 to 1995.

“We created guidelines for appropriate conversation,” Windmueller said, adding that among the factors the JCRC considered when determining whether a particular speaker would be invited to speak at Federation were “respect for other communities’ religious beliefs.”

“There were certain boundaries that we set on what were acceptable and not acceptable voices that we want to engage,” Windmueller said.

The policy was particularly valuable in minimizing the severity of disputes about Israel among Jews on the left and right, in part because it pre-empted the objections of those who disagreed with it.

“Meir Kahane was considered off-limits, and that was pretty well known,” Windmueller said, referring to the controversial founder of the Jewish Defense League, which the FBI considered to be a terrorist organization. “Whether his supporters liked that or not, they at least knew from the beginning.”

Los Angeles is not the only Federation to have had sanctions against Kahane. Rabbi Douglas Kahn, executive director of the JCRC of the Bay Area, recalled a meeting that took place between Kahane and Earl Raab, then head of the JCRC.

The Bay Area Jewish Community Federation had decided that Kahane, who had announced his plan to visit in advance, would not be allowed to enter the building, so Kahane and Raab met in a location off-site, Kahn said, “which I actually believe was Earl’s old Dodge parked very nearby, no doubt while [Earl was] smoking a cigar. And I think they spent about an hour talking in the car.”

More recently, the Bay Area JCRC helped to devise a formal set of guidelines for “potentially controversial Israel-related programming.” The guidelines, which apply to all organizations funded by the Bay Area Federation, were created in 2010 in response to an event in conjunction with the 2009 San Francisco Jewish Film Festival that roiled many in the local Jewish community.

For a screening of a documentary about the activist Rachel Corrie, who died in 2003 while protesting Israeli demolition of Palestinians’ homes in Gaza, Corrie’s mother was invited to speak. The decision, and the absence of a forum for the expression of other points of view, set off a firestorm of criticism, directed first at the festival and later at The Federation, which sponsored the event.

The guidelines, adopted in February 2010, state that the Bay Area Federation will not fund organizations that hold events or partner with organizations that “(1) endorse or promote anti-Semitism, other forms of bigotry, violence or other extremist views; (2) actively seek to proselytize Jews away from Judaism; or (3) advocate for, or endorse, undermining the legitimacy of Israel as a secure independent, democratic Jewish state, including through participation in the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, in whole or in part.”

“I think it has had a really positive effect with respect to calming the community, clarifying general terms where reasonable boundaries lie, not stifling the broad range of opinion and helping providing guidance to those organizations that receive funding from Federation,” Kahn said.

Kahn called the controversy over the Corrie film “an educable moment,” and Sandler said Los Angeles’ Federation is aiming to respond to the Geller incident in a similar way.

“You learn from every situation,” Sandler said, “and because this happened, it is good that we will be able to put processes in place to make sure it does not happen again.”

After barring anti-Islam activist, Federation reconsiders events policy Read More »

Five comments on Israel’s political crisis

‎1.‎

There is a crisis, and as much as all parties would like to avoid further escalation of it, it’s not at all clear that they still have control over their own fate. Why the crisis? Simply ‎and very briefly put: Kadima joined Netanyahu’s coalition to save itself from ‎annihilation. To achieve such a goal, it needs something with which it can ‎demonstrate why it was good for the public to have such vast coalition (94 members). ‎The most available achievement was Ulegislation that will finally put an end to Israel’s ‎immoral and unsustainable arrangement that lets ultra-Orthodox Yeshiva students ‎evade military service, and the job market. With a vast coalition, Haredi political power ‎becomes less relevant and the ability to pass such legislation is there. Hence, a ‎committee, recommendations, promises to the public, on the road to equality. ‎

Alas, the Prime Minister, initially supportive of this effort, suddenly got cold feet. The ‎committee is dismantled, promises broken, humiliation evident. Kadima leader Shaul ‎Mofaz is angry for good reason. Netanyahu has made him seem like an amateur, seem ‎foolish. Kadima – unless handed a very tall political ladder – will have to leave the ‎coalition.‎

‎2.‎

Kadima can’t really leave. Well, it can, but the consequences would be devastating. ‎Look at the polls and the trends: Kadima is a mirage, 28 mandates in the Knesset and ‎almost no public support. For Kadima’s MKs, the next election will mark the end of ‎much desired political careers. Thus, Mofaz needs a ladder, is almost begging for a ‎ladder. And he will get one, very soon, and he will hold on tight and attempt to try ‎down. But it is not at all clear that he’ll be able to convince his other Kadima friends to ‎hold on to this ladder too, and climb down to the safety of the coalition with him. ‎

Kadima is like a drowning vessel, and the captain, attempting to keep things orderly, is ‎losing control. In politics, it is always every man for himself. In the politics of ‎desperadoes, it is every man for himself and against all others. On Monday, Kadima ‎members will gather and make a decision: do they want to die now, with some dignity, ‎or most likely die later without dignity. It reminds me of George Costanza’s ‎unforgettable saying: “I live my whole life in shame, why should I die with dignity?”‎

‎3.‎

But Netanyahu still wants Kadima to stay. That is, if the price isn’t too high, if he doesn’t ‎have to lose of hope of ever again winning the support of the ultra-Orthodox parties. I ‎spoke to one of Netanyahu’s men today. He called to express his anticipated ‎unhappiness with the article I posted yesterday in the IHT-New York Times. “You’ve ‎been too harsh with the PM,” he said. “Netanyahu is serious about passing ‎meaningful legislation but can’t let this process to be handled in such amateurish way. ‎Why did Mofaz appoint a novice MK to head the committee? Why the constant leaks ‎from the committee? Why the urge to make this a public confrontation – don’t you know ‎Haredi leaders can only compromise if we let them save face?” This is a sensitive ‎matter, Netanyahu is telling those willing to listen – including some Kadima MKs. It ‎cannot be fixed with a hammer. ‎

‎4.‎

Still, Netanyahu knows that an election focused on the Haredi issue, an election ‎season in which he will be depicted as the man who sold out the majority interest to a ‎vocal and highly engaged minority, is dangerous. Luckily for him, there are not many ‎leaders in the arena who can be considered candidates to steal his crown. ‎But one can sense some nervousness in the PM’s castle. Like a kid with a new toy, two ‎months ago Netanyahu was quite happy with a stable coalition that did not include ‎Kadima, but now, the possibility of losing the toy is making everybody glum. ‎

‎5.‎

As for substance, if anyone still cares, the Plesner committee did a fine job. The plan is ‎solid and sensible. One can omit an element here and delete a recommendation there ‎if there’s a need to pretend that the deal is a “compromise” and not dictated by the ‎committee. But all in all, it is a measured plan (I’d probably toughen it a bit more), with ‎sticks and carrots and all that is needed to put an end to a shameful and hurtful ‎arrangement. It is time.‎

Five comments on Israel’s political crisis Read More »

‘Freedom School’ keeps reading alive through summer

Pausing in the middle of reading “Grandpa, Is Everything Black Bad?” at a moment when the protagonist of the children’s book, Montsho, has been called the black sheep of his family, Tanya Graham asks 10 elementary school students grouped around her: “Have you ever felt different from your family?”

“This book makes me think about my family,” one student says. “I’m the oldest and have to take care of my sister and my brother.”

Later in the story, when Montsho learns about his African heritage from his grandfather, Graham stops reading again to ask, “Does anyone know what heritage is?”

Several hands shoot up, and one girl with a long ponytail immediately answers, “It’s like a history.”

Graham approves. “Who wants to write for me?” she asks. Half the hands in the room shoot up as the students volunteer to write the word “heritage” on a piece of paper to post on the word wall.

As they continue to read and discuss the story, a girl in a pink shawl says, “This is better than school.”

“It’s Freedom School,” Graham replies.

Graham’s students are among the more than 50 students from Stanley Mosk Elementary School in Winnetka who are attending Freedom School at Stephen S. Wise Temple this summer.

The six-week literacy and enrichment program for low-income, at-risk students aims to prevent the loss in reading skills experienced by many students over the summer. Attending the Freedom School, which began on June 25, is free, and each week students get to take home and keep one book.

Senior Rabbi Eli Herscher neatly summed up the Freedom School philosophy on opening day, when he had the assembled students read the words “Freedom School” on a banner. “If you really want to be free, you need to learn,” he said.

The first Freedom Schools started in the 1960s in Mississippi to educate and empower disenfranchised minority communities. The Children’s Defense Fund (CDF), a nonprofit that advocates for children affected by poverty and disabilities, began its own freedom school movement in 1992. There are approximately 10 other CDF Freedom Schools currently operating in Southern California.

Providing facilities, staff and funding, Stephen S. Wise Temple is the first Jewish site on the West Coast to implement the CDF Freedom School. Its curriculum includes a full morning of reading-related activities and discussion, afternoon activities such as science experiments and gardening and a weekly field trip, along with motivational songs and chants.

The Freedom School students are taught by Servant Leader Interns (SLI), often college students like Graham who attended CDF training seminars.

“Freedom Schools are important because they give children a chance to enjoy reading. Once they love to read, everything else comes easy,” said Tiffany Davis, who worked as an SLI for two years and is now Stephen S. Wise Temple’s assistant site coordinator for Freedom School.

A 1983 study of 600 New York City schools found that about 80 percent of the achievement difference between socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged schools could be accounted for by summer learning loss of the disadvantaged students between grades two and six. And a 2010 study by the Center for Adolescent Literacies at the University of North Carolina Charlotte found that nearly 90 percent of Freedom School students grew or maintained in their ability to read.

Mosk principal Barbara Friedrich said 88 percent of her students qualify for free lunch, and added that without the Freedom School the students would probably be at home doing nothing over the summer. “A lot of them are homeless or living in garages,” she said.

Friedrich says Stanley Mosk Elementary is facing additional challenges from the recent funding cuts to education and related social programs. She can no longer afford a full-time intervention specialist to work with her struggling readers. The 421-student campus has 129 English-language learners.

Stephen S. Wise’s Rabbi Ron Stern, who first learned about Freedom Schools from an article in Reform Judaism magazine, knew his synagogue would be a perfect partner for the program. Although most facilities demand a year of preparation and fundraising, the synagogue opened its Freedom School five months later.

Project director Andrea Sonnenberg and Jennifer Smith, Stephen S. Wise’s social justice coordinator, trained with CDF in Tennessee.

“Before every meal, they would ask people to say grace,” Sonnenberg said. “So we said the ha-Motzi on the microphone, and the people went wild. They were so touched and impressed, and thrilled to learn about another religion, and that Jewish people were interested in helping underprivileged kids.”

Stephen S. Wise Temple has even provided some of its own high school students to assist in the Freedom School classrooms, as junior SLIs. The temple hopes to expand its Freedom School in the coming years and to inspire other synagogues in Los Angeles to start their own.

The Freedom School has even provided temple clergy an opportunity to teach the Mosk students about Judaism.

On a recent Friday, Rabbi Lydia Medwin came to morning assembly to read a book to the students and speak to them briefly as a role model.

“Does anyone know what a rabbi is?” Medwin asked.

One student guessed that it had to do with the Lorax, the book in Medwin’s hands.

Another said, “It’s a leader?”

Pointing to the rabbi’s kippah, another student said, “What is that?”

“A kippah is a symbol we wear on our heads, to remind us that we are not the end-all-be-all in this world,” Medwin told the children. “I wear it when I learn and teach, because learning is a very holy thing.”

‘Freedom School’ keeps reading alive through summer Read More »

Tom Cruise-Katie Holmes divorce teaches a lesson in love

Call it romantic idealism or shallow egoism but most women adore PDA.

A beautiful bouquet sent from a lover is nice, but receiving it at work to the oohs and ahhs of others is better, as if to say, ‘Look how she’s adored.’ A quiet candlelit proposal is surely sweet and intimate, but a dazzling display at a city landmark is grand and cinematic. It bespeaks pride. Even the jewelry a man gives a woman is seen less as a statement of his wealth than how he values his love, as if it says, ‘Look how much I think she’s worth.’

So it seemed promising when Tom Cruise lavishly love-jumped on Oprah’s couch declaring his feelings for Katie Holmes. He had no qualms that people would know, that they would judge, that his private affairs should even remain private. He was bursting and besotted.

“Something’s happened to you!” Oprah shouted with a mix of curiosity and amazement. “Something’s happened to you!”

Who was this gushing goof formerly known as Tom Cruise?

“I’m in love,” he proclaimed, throwing his hands in the air.

“I have to say to you,” Oprah added, admitting her befuddlement. “I’ve known you for a a while and you are such an intensely, I mean intensely, intensely! intensely! private person. And then, now you are just out everywhere kissin’ and a huggin’….I thought, ‘What has happened to you???’”

Cruise threw his arms up again in a triumphant pose, gesticulating up and down, falling to his knees, posing like Adonis, banging on the floor and vociferously nodding (which is what I imagine he might do if he ever won an Oscar). More than “in love” he seemed downright possessed.

“We’ve never seen you behave this way before!” an astonished Oprah said, still not quite believing her eyes. “Have you ever felt this way before?”

Again Cruise jumped on the couch, then, oddly, began wrestling Oprah down while she crowed and cackled.

“You are gone,” she told him. “You are gone.”

“I’m gone and I don’t care,” Cruise rejoined.

Five years and a pending divorce later, the stunt seems shallow. What were we to make of such a public outpouring? Simply that they were madly in love, going to marry in a castle and live happily ever after? That we should affectionately call them “TomKat” since we knew them so well? After all, since their courtship began before our very eyes didn’t we have a right to share in the progress of their story?

But all that glutinous display, though exciting and flattering, inciting jealousy among couples who do not so publicly adore one another, was for naught. Extravagant public displays, Tom Cruise has so generously taught, are meaningless. Remember Bennifer (the one-name moniker ascribed to Ben Afflect and JLo)? Their romance delivered fur, cars, the sexy “Jenny From The Block” music video and a $1 million engagement ring. But it too ended, short of all the romantic promise implied by their public struttings.

The disappointing ends of these Hollywood romances will probably not deflect continued public admiration of them. But they do add a dose of disillusionment. Glamorous though they are, adoring fans would do well to remember that real relationships happen in private. Any love story worth its salt depends on a zone of intimacy between two people to which the public, family or friends, have no access. Foisting adulation and attention on the romantic lives of others is a pleasant distraction when we need it, but much of what we imagine is our own elaborate fantasy and not the reality of the people in receipt of our projection.

Of course, real love is hard to hide. It is magical and powerful and beautiful. But it doesn’t need to be stated; it is seen.

Tom Cruise-Katie Holmes divorce teaches a lesson in love Read More »