fbpx

June 17, 2012

Taken from bookstore, first edition of Book of Mormon found

I’ve long assumed that religious book stores don’t have to deal with a lot of shoplifting. After all, who has the gall to steal a copy of the Bible?

But that calculus changes when the religious paraphernalia is more of an artifact and is worth significant money. A Torah, for instance, costs thousands of dollars and have on occasion ” title=”The Washington Post” target=”_blank”>The Washington Post reports:

Jay Michael Linford, a fellow Mormon bookseller who had been “like a grandson” to the shop’s owner, was arrested at his friend’s apartment and charged with theft and trafficking in stolen property.

(skip)

The news last month that Helen Spencer Schlie’s first edition had been stolen spread quickly through the small, tightknit world of rare-book dealers, who were aware of Schlie’s book as one of 5,000 original 1830 copies of the Book of Mormon, which is viewed by Mormons as sacred text.

But the theft didn’t elicit much sympathy for the Mesa, Ariz., widow, who had become something of a pariah for removing individual pages from the book and offering them for sale.

“Divine intervention,” a prominent Salt Lake City bookseller said about the theft.

Read the Taken from bookstore, first edition of Book of Mormon found Read More »

Mormon author ’emphatically not a Christian

David Mason, author of “” title=”New York Times” target=”_blank”>New York Times this week in which he took issue with the apparent need of Mormon newsmakers to be liked.

Mason wrote:

This is the so-called Mormon Moment: a strange convergence of developments offering Mormons hope that the Christian nation that persecuted, banished or killed them in the 19th century will finally love them as fellow Christians.

I want to be on record about this. I’m about as genuine a Mormon as you’ll find — a templegoer with a Utah pedigree and an administrative position in a congregation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I am also emphatically not a Christian.

For the curious, the dispute can be reduced to Jesus. Mormons assert that because they believe Jesus is divine, they are Christians by default. Christians respond that because Mormons don’t believe — in accordance with the Nicene Creed promulgated in the fourth century — that Jesus is also the Father and the Holy Spirit, the Jesus that Mormons have in mind is someone else altogether. The Mormon reaction is incredulity. The Christian retort is exasperation. Rinse and repeat.

This is one reason that in 2008 evangelicals said Mitt Romney was ” title=”world’s worst kept secret” target=”_blank”>world’s worst kept secret. And it’s at times Mormon author ’emphatically not a Christian Read More »

June 17, 2012

Noteworthy

No Iranian Nukes

Writing in the Weekly Standard, Jamie Fly and William Kristol call on the U.S. to ‎present military measures as a way to halt Iran’s nuclear program. ‎

But Iran’s nuclear progress marches on. That fact trumps all the administration’s hopes ‎and wishes and theories. Facts are stubborn things, and so is the Iranian nuclear ‎program. No one seriously believes the talks set to resume shortly in Moscow will stop ‎Iranian nuclear progress. Indeed, the talks look increasingly like the farcical diplomatic ‎process pursued by the Bush and Obama administrations with respect to Iran’s friend, ‎North Korea, a “process” that has resulted in a growing nuclear stockpile in that country ‎and a series of unanswered North Korean provocations.‎

Is Egypt’s Old Regime Preparing a ‎Comeback Crackdown?‎

With the apparent backing of the military, for Mubarak prime minister Ahmed ‎Shafik seems confident of a win in the presidential elections, writes Abigail Hauslohner in Time. ‎

Shafik’s supporters are extra confident, perhaps, because it would seem that the ‎ruling military is on their side. On Thursday, the country’s Supreme ‎Constitutional Court dissolved the uprising’s only tangible accomplishment thus ‎far: its democratically elected parliament, which the Muslim Brotherhood had ‎dominated. The move swiftly eliminated the Islamists’ only center of power in a ‎system that has yet to see a new constitution drafted or even the next president’s ‎powers defined. And while many liberals said the military may have manipulated ‎the verdict, they also said the Brotherhood had gotten greedy — seeking too ‎much power, too soon, and they deserved what they got.

Israeli Settlements‏,‏‎ American Pressure, and Peace

The Obama administration’s insistence on a settlement freeze by Israel has put the ‎peace process back, not moved it forward, writes Steven J. Rosen for the Jerusalem ‎Center for Public Affairs.‎

Obama’s strategy of confrontation over settlements, in other words, has backfired. ‎The Palestinian issue has now regressed to the pre-Madrid situation before 1991: ‎Palestinians once again refuse to meet with Israelis, and speak of abandoning the ‎two-state solution and returning to armed struggle.

Media Digest:

  • Times of Israel: Israel must keep mum on Egypt elections, says top ‎defense official

  • Haaretz:  Israeli officials: Hamas ordered Grad attack at request of Muslim ‎Brotherhood

  • The Jerusalem Post: ‘US should arm Syrian opposition to ‎bring down Assad’‎

  • Ynet: Romney says he’ll do opposite of Obama on Israel

  • New York Times: Iran Will Face a Critical Choice in ‎New Round of Talks

  • Washington Post: Israeli ‎President Shimon Peres ‎discusses Syria and Iran

  • Wall Street Journal: Egypt’s ‎Revolution Stalls in Divide-‎and-Conquer Politics

  • June 17, 2012 Read More »

    Supporting Dads Who Have Children with Special Needs

    Last week at the Father of the Year gala sponsored by the American Diabetes Association, Dr. Francine Kaufman of Medtronic/Children’s Hospital shared an important research finding. When she and her colleagues looked back at the records of children with diabetes, a key indicator of achieving control of blood sugar levels was the involvement of the Dad.“When Dads were actively involved in the medical care of their children, it really made a difference,” she said.

    Further evidence of this comes from the Mormons. When I was helping to start a support group for Dads of kids with special needs at the LA Jewish Federation, we did some digging around to see which other groups were best supporting the Dads, and found ourselves looking way beyond the Jewish community, which unfortunately has very little in terms of formal support for fathers of children with special needs.

    Turns out that the largest body of literature on this topic came from the Mormon church that doesn’t have paid full-time clergy at the local levels. Male members in particular are expected to perform their ecclesiastical duties on top of career and family responsibilities.

    As a result of the need to keep all Dads actively engaged, the Mormon Church has a webpage on Dads and children with disabilities, filled with both commonsense and LDS specific advice: “Remember, learning how to raise a child with a disability is a process, not an event. You may need time to understand the demands and challenges of raising a child with a disability. At first you may have difficulty accepting that your child’s life may be different from what you planned and expected. “

    In the secular world, there’s some great groups working on supporting special Dads, such as the Fathers Network, and Exceptional Parent magazine.In Los Angeles, there’s an excellent local group called DADA at http://dadadads.org/dada/.

    With the Moms often more involved in the day-to-day logistics and details of their children and teens with special needs, the Dads involvement is often overlooked, but it may be just the critical factor needed for children reaching their maximum potential. 

    As the Fatherwork website says

    “Fathers of special-needs children are ordinary men doing both ordinary and extraordinary things since parents of special-needs kids do the same things other parents do but usually have added burdens (and, often, added joys).”

     

    Supporting Dads Who Have Children with Special Needs Read More »

    Pearls From A Shabbat Lecture in Jerusalem Women’s Rituals Are Older Than You Think

    One of the pleasures of Shabbat in Jerusalem is the availability of many incredibly interesting classes some of which I make plans to attend others I catch by happenstance.

    The latter was last Shabbat after tefillot at” title=”Aliza Lavie” target=”_blank”>Aliza Lavie author of two books Tefillot Nashim (translated into English as A   Jewish Woman’s Prayer Book and Minhag Nashim (women’s customs) the latter book contains maps showing the presence of these customs dating back centuries throughout the full spectrum of Jewish communities around the world. Both books were bestsellers in Israel. In fact Professor Lavie told us that even though the book was not made officially permissible in the haredi community, many charedi women, purchased the book and then photocopied sections so as to have the material without owning the book.

    Particularly interesting is that what is old becomes new again. Several ceremonies which are considered 20th century innovations have existed for centruries.

    She has found prayers and rabbinical texts associated with bat mitzvah in Italy, Germany, and Libya from the mid 19th centrury

    She was also pleasantly surprised that when she celebrated a simchat bat commemorating the birth of her daughter, her caregiver exclaimed that she remembered such ceremonies in that dated back for centuries in her Middle Eastern communities. Ceremonies associated with the birth of a daughter date back at least as far as the mid 19th century throughout the Jewish communities in the Middle East, Italy and Ashkenazic communities including traditions among chassidim for such ceremonies.

    Women’s rosh chodesh celebrations, now extremely popular across the spectrum of American Jewry and a an innovation of the last few decades also have roots going back centruies. Various forms of specifically female commemorations of Rosh Chodehs across communities in the land of Israel, Tunisia, Morocco, Kurdistan also date back centuries and are. in fact mentioned in the Jerusalem Talmud. There is mention of rosh chodesh as a “Shabbat” without work for womens but not for men. A tradition kept in many communities for centuries. Women in the middle ages wore special clothes on rosh chodesh . In the land of Israel centuries ago women had a large celebratory meal and on erev rosh chodesh there was a particularly large presence of women praying at the kotel and Rachel’s Tomb .

    During the lecture and in her book she presents many moving prayers marking important lifecycle events in a woman’s life including the beginnings of pregnancy as well as prayers associated with specific mitvot associated with women such as mikva and separating challah when baking challa (although of course nothing prevents men from baking challa ?) She also presented lost customs with prayers such as women preparing the candles lit for Yom Kippur.

    The English translation of the book won the National Jewish Book Award Dr. Lavie has lectured widely in the United States and is available for lectures.

     

    Pearls From A Shabbat Lecture in Jerusalem Women’s Rituals Are Older Than You Think Read More »

    Israelis and Obama: Is it getting better?‎

    Three days before the ADL-BESA conference on US-Israel relations (I’m a ‎participant, and will speak on a panel) a new poll commissioned for the ‎conference was released.

    The poll has quite a few interesting questions, of ‎which Herb Keinon of the Jerusalem Post chose to highlight the one on Iran:‎

    A vast majority (66%) of Israelis said they would support military action if ‎diplomatic and economic efforts failed to get Iran to stop uranium ‎enrichment, and of that number, 75% would support this action even if the ‎Obama administration were opposed…

    Have something to say about this? Join the debate at Rosner’s Domain on Facebook

    It is indeed an interesting number, considering previous polls and their ‎outcomes. If you’re interested in knowing more and understanding Israelis’ ‎ambivalence on this matter, go here. This post, though, is about Israelis and ‎President Obama. Many questions in the new survey contribute some to the ‎understanding of the way Israelis view President Barak Obama, make things a ‎little bit more clear, but not yet clear:‎

    Regarding the US president, most respondents have an overall favorable ‎opinion of Barack Obama, but are skeptical about his Middle East policies; ‎while 60 percent said they had either a “somewhat favorable” or “very ‎favorable” opinion of Obama, and 14% said their attitude toward him was ‎unfavorable, only 32% of the respondents said they approved of Obama’s ‎policies toward Israel, and 21% said they disapproved. Fully 47%, however, ‎had no answer regarding those policies, an indication that people were still ‎forming an opinion.

    The BESA-ADL survey does not include the standard question on presidential ‎ideological or political preferences – whether voters think he is more pro-‎Palestinian, pro-Arab, or more pro-Israel. Such a question is common in surveys ‎tracking American support for Israel (if you’re interested in American public ‎support for Israel, try our Israel Favorability tracker). And it is also a question one ‎can find in many different polls of Israelis being asked about President Obama. ‎The following graph will give you a sense of how Israelis responded to this ‎question between 2008 and September of 2011 (when the last such poll was ‎published):‎

    Photo

    A few comments on this graph:‎

    ‎1.‎ Israelis, for most of Obama’s (first) term, didn’t trust him. They tended to ‎think he is not Israel’s friend, but rather the friend of the other side, or a ‎neutral president – hardly what Israelis expect an American president to ‎be (whether or not they have the right to such an expectation is another matter).

    ‎2.‎ The improvement in Obama’s standings with Israelis, recorded in many ‎polls, BESA-ADL included, is also notable here. The second half of ‎Obama’s first term looks somewhat better than the first half. I suspect, ‎though, that this improvement is very fragile.

    ‎3.‎ According to BESA-ADL, Israelis believe Romney would be better for ‎Israel than Obama. This could still be the situation even if future polls did ‎show that Israelis had come to view Obama as more pro-Israel than they ‎had previously thought.

    ‎4.‎ If you want to track Obama’s standings with Israelis, our J-Meter is the ‎way to go. Next week, we will be adding another rubric to J Meter, that will ‎include the graph above with all relevant details (the polls, questions etc), ‎and another graph on Israelis and Obama (positive view, negative view). 

    Another way of tracking Obama’s standings with Israelis is our survey of ‎experts – the Israel Factor. This week a new Factor will also be added, ‎and I can already tell you that there’s a gap between Israel’s public view ‎of Obama and Israel’s expert view of the president.‎

    ‎ ‎

    Israelis and Obama: Is it getting better?‎ Read More »

    The Israel Factor 06.2012, Full Statistics

    ‎1. Please rate the following observations from1-5, with 1 being totally disagree and 5 totally agree:

    Statement

    The US is ‎going to stick to the sanctions + talks approach to Iran for at least few more months

    4.33

    The US will launch an attack on ‎Iran’s nuclear facilities before the November election

    1.78

    Israel can’t attack Iran’s nuclear facilities without American ‎consent

    2.67

    US policy ‎toward Syria is unlikely to change

    3.44

    The administration is losing patience with the Palestinian leadership

    2.87

    More Israelis would like Romney ‎to win the 2012 election

    3.89

    Obama is not getting enough credit from Israelis for his support and assistance

    3.78

    2. From 1 (bad for Israel) to 10 (good for Israel), please rank the following institutions:

    Institution

    AIPAC

    8.4

    J ‎Street

    5.8

    Democratic ‎Party

    7.33

    Republican ‎Party

    7.05

    Congress

    7.11

    The Obama ‎administration

    6.56

    ‎3. Looking ahead for 2012, please rate the following presidential candidates on scale of 1 (bad for ‎Israel) to 10 (good for Israel):

    Candidate

    Barack ‎Obama

    7.44

    Mitt ‎Romney

    7.44

    The Israel Factor 06.2012, Full Statistics Read More »

    The Israel Factor 06.2012, Questionnaire

    ‎1. Please rate the following observations from1-5, with 1 being totally disagree and 5 totally agree:

    Statement

    The US is ‎going to stick to the sanctions + talks approach to Iran for at least few more months

     

    The US will launch an attack on ‎Iran’s nuclear facilities before the November election

     

    Israel can’t attack Iran’s nuclear facilities without American ‎consent

     

    US policy ‎toward Syria is unlikely to change

     

    The administration is losing patience with the Palestinian leadership

     

    More Israelis would like Romney ‎to win the 2012 election

     

    Obama is not getting enough credit from Israelis for his support and assistance

     

    2. From 1 (bad for Israel) to 10 (good for Israel), please rank the following institutions:

    Institution

    AIPAC

     

    J ‎Street

     

    Democratic ‎Party

     

    Republican ‎Party

     

    Congress

     

    The Obama ‎administration

     

    ‎3. Looking ahead for 2012, please rate the following presidential candidates on scale of 1 (bad for ‎Israel) to 10 (good for Israel):

    Candidate

    Barack ‎Obama

     

    Mitt ‎Romney

     

    The Israel Factor 06.2012, Questionnaire Read More »

    Israel Factor: Where’s the Romney lead?‎

    It’s gone. The Romney lead is gone. Our Israel Factor experts, like it or ‎not, have given President Obama a mark identical to Romney’s on the ‎ultimate question of “good for Israel”.

    Not a small feat, considering the ‎fact that this is the first time for them to do such thing in a very long ‎time.

    Romney, as you can see in the following graph, was ahead of ‎Obama for almost the whole time since we started tracking the ‎candidates back in 2006.

    I’ll tell you why it happened right after the ‎graph:‎

    Photo

    Four explanations can help us understand the mysterious ways of the ‎panel:‎

    The enthusiasm gap: Of our 10-member panel, five still think that ‎Romney is the better candidate for Israel and give him a higher mark. ‎Four panelists believe that an Obama second term is better for Israel. ‎One panelist quite consistently gives them both the same mark. ‎However, the Obama-tilted experts are more enthusiastic about him ‎than the Romney-tilted experts feel strongly about Romney (so ‎remember, most of the panel still believes Romney is the better ‎candidate). ‎

    The dislike gap: The Obama-tilted experts tend to be quite dismissive ‎of Romney. They dislike Romney more than the other group dislike ‎Obama. Some of them seem to dislike the Republican Party and ‎ideology. We compared the panelists’ answers and the picture became ‎very clear: the three panelists that gave Romney the lowest score are ‎also those giving the Republican Party the lowest score (and remember, ‎most of the panel still believes Romney is the better candidate). ‎

    Have something to say about this? Join the debate at Rosner’s Domain on Facebook

    The expert gap: Our panel is moderate, it is centrist – as we’ve always ‎contended. This is not reflective of the opinion of the Israeli public. The ‎public is a little bit less suspicious of Obama than it used to be, but is still ‎pretty far from supporting a second Obama term, according to recent ‎polls. A moderate panel tends to be cautious, tends not to be ‎appreciative of tough talk and bravado, tends to ignore public ‎sentiments. Our panel knows what the Israeli public probably wants – ‎see question number 1, the statement before last – and takes its own ‎path (and remember, most of the panel still believes Romney is the ‎better candidate).  ‎

    The credit gap: Maybe what the panel is doing is compensating ‎President Obama for the lack of deserved support from Israelis. Look at ‎the last statement in our first question – we asked the panel to rank the ‎statement with which it agrees/disagrees, and the last statement was ‎‎“Obama is not getting enough credit from Israelis for his support and ‎assistance”. The panel gave this statement a 4 out of 5. That’s pretty ‎high. And interestingly, those believing Obama deserves more credit ‎also gave him a higher mark, as if they were supposed to balance this ‎deficiency in credit due (and we still have to remember: more of the ‎panel still believes Romney is the better candidate).‎

    Israel Factor: Where’s the Romney lead?‎ Read More »

    Israel begins repatriating South Sudanese migrants

    A planeload of 120 illegal migrants was scheduled to leave Israel for repatriation in South Sudan.

    The migrants reportedly began boarding buses Sunday afternoon headed for Ben Gurion Airport for a flight that evening.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the repatriation “orderly and dignified.”

    “We have a Jewish tradition of treating strangers humanely, and even when we need to deport them from our midst due to the state’s desire to control its borders, we must do so humanely and in a manner that finds expression in a restrained and humane manner,” Netanyahu said Sunday at the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting.

    Netanyahu said that a second plane bound for South Sudan would leave next week.

    He added that as of last week, infiltrators are placed in detention and can be detained for years. New detention facilities are being built, he said.

    The Population, Immigration and Borders Authority said at the end of last week that it would extend the one-week deadline for illegal migrants from South Sudan to voluntarily leave the country, receiving a cash grant and a flight home in exchange.

    Meanwhile, a firebomb was thrown Saturday night at a bar in south Tel Aviv’s Hatikvah neighborhood where migrants from Eritrea gather. One man was wounded.

    Firebombs were thrown last month in two separate incidents at apartments in which several African migrants lived.

    Israel begins repatriating South Sudanese migrants Read More »