fbpx

September 13, 2011

Embassy attack in Egypt stokes Israeli fears of new Egypt

Retired Israeli Air Force pilot Uri Dromi remembers the day 34 years ago when Egyptian President Anwar Sadat landed in Israel to tell the Israeli people that he was ready to make peace.

Dromi, who had flown missions in the 1967 Six-Day War against Egypt, had been assigned to escort the Egyptian air crew during Sadat’s visit.

“I was standing there on the tarmac and suddenly there’s this big airliner with Egyptian markings being escorted by three Israeli jet fighters,” Dromi told JTA. “It turns and lands. The door opens and there stands Anwar Sadat, who until then had been the leader of our greatest enemy. This is one of the moments I will always cherish.”

Today, Dromi, who runs the Mishkenot Sha’ananim conference center in Jerusalem and organizes briefings for journalists, is worried that the historic peace between Egypt and Israel could be unraveling.

Last week’s attack on the Israeli Embassy in Cairo by a mob of thousands of Egyptians has him worried.

“I think it is serious because there’s a lot of energy there,” Dromi said. “The anti-Israel sentiment was always there, but it was marginal compared to the problems Egyptians had. Now Egyptians are expressing all of their anger and frustration against Israel.”

The embassy attack, during which a mob pulled down the embassy walls, broke into the building and rampaged for several hours while six Israeli security guards were trapped inside, was the latest and perhaps most worrisome in a series of events south of the border that have Israel concerned that it faces a game-changer with the new Egypt.

Most worrisome, some Israeli officials said, was their inability to reach senior Egyptian officials quickly. Instead they had to rely on U.S. mediation.

“There were difficulties in reaching certain Egyptian officials,” a senior Israeli official told JTA. “And the real difficulty was that even when they were finally reached, their promises for quick intervention did not materialize as quickly as the situation required.”

Egyptian commandos eventually arrived to rescue the trapped Israelis, and Israel sent its Air Force jets to retrieve them and bring them home. The official said he does not expect the embassy to reopen soon but that there are contacts with Egyptian security officials.

“We are discussing how to ensure that such an attack will never happen again and what is needed to be done to secure the reopening of the embassy,” he said. “We are definitely worried. Which way Egypt is going is anybody’s guess.”

The Egyptian military council running the country quickly condemned the attack, called the rioters “criminals” and said it would launch criminal proceedings against those caught.

“The Egyptian leadership said they are committed to the peace treaty, and so are we,” Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev told JTA. “Anyone over 50 remembers the Egyptian-Israeli wars in which thousands of people on both sides of the frontier were killed. I don’t think the people of Israel or Egypt want to go back to that.”

The 32-year-old peace treaty between Israel and Egypt is one of the cornerstones of Israel’s security doctrine. While it has resulted in few people-to-people ties, the pact made Israel’s southern border reliably quiet and freed up Israel’s military to focus on threats elsewhere.

“We’ve always had a saying that without Egypt there’s no war and without Syria there’s no peace,” said Yehuda Ben Meir, an analyst at the INSS think tank at Tel Aviv University. “Even when relations were cold, the peace treaty was solid.”

Under Hosni Mubarak, who ruled Egypt from Sadat’s assassination in 1981 until he was deposed early this year, Egypt established military and intelligence cooperation with Israel. Both Egypt and Israel viewed Hamas’ growing strength warily, and Egyptian security forces tried to stop the smuggling of weapons and terrorists from the Sinai into Hamas-ruled Gaza. Since Mubarak’s ouster, Israeli intelligence officials say, smuggling has dramatically increased.

Despite a recent poll showing that more than half of Egyptians would support severing ties with Israel, most Israeli experts don’t believe Egypt will rush to abrogate its peace treaty with Israel. Most of the Egyptian political factions, including the Muslim Brotherhood, have said they will continue the peace treaty. Cutting off ties also would threaten the $3 billion in foreign aid that Egypt receives annually from the United States.

But Israel is concerned. The attack on the embassy came just weeks after a terrorist attack on the border between Israel and Egypt that left eight Israelis dead. Israeli officials said the terrorists traveled from Gaza to Egypt and then into Israel. Three Egyptian security officers were killed inadvertently in firefights after the attack.

“Peace with Egypt has always been a cornerstone of our strategic position in the region,” Dromi said. “Whatever else happened with Lebanon or Syria, we always had that peace to offset everything else. If this falls, there could be a chain reaction. We’re already hearing rhetoric from Jordan that we haven’t heard in a very long time.”

King Abdullah of Jordan, which is the only other Arab country besides Egypt that has a formal peace treaty with Israel, said this week that “Jordan and the future of the Palestinian people are in better shape than Israel today. Now it is Israel that is fearful.”

Israeli officials said they are working hard to repair relations with Egypt. But Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu this week also ordered Israel to speed up construction on a fence being built between Israel and the Sinai to try to stop smuggling. He said construction will finished by September 2012.

“Israel’s border with Egypt is a border of peace,” Netanyahu said while visiting the area. ”To continue the peace, there must be security and to this end a fence is necessary. Its rapid construction is important for both peace and security.”

Embassy attack in Egypt stokes Israeli fears of new Egypt Read More »

Forward analysis: Jewish groups get most security grants

Most Homeland Security grants have gone to Jewish institutions in the six years since the program was instituted, a Forward analysis has discovered.

Of those Jewish institutions, most funds were distributed to Orthodox groups.

Since 2005, the Nonprofit Security Grant Program administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has allocated $118 million to not-for-profit organizations to prepare themselves against terror attacks.

Of the 995 Homeland Security Grants distributed from 2007 to 2010, 734, or 73.7 percent, went to Jewish organizations. Orthodox institutions received about 45 percent of those grants.

This year, Jewish groups were awarded 81 percent of the grants, which were announced in August, according to the Forward.

Jewish organizations were successful in getting the grants due to coalition lobbying, according to the newspaper.

The Forward pointed out that some Jewish communal leaders oppose the program on constitutional grounds.

The newspaper reported that Jewish institutions have been more successful because the rules for grant applications favor religious institutions over other not-for-profits; high-risk metropolitan areas are given top priority in the grant process, including cities with high concentrations of Jews; and the institutions must demonstrate that similar institutions have been attacked previously.

Only a handful of Muslim institutions have received federal assistance to upgrade security, according to the report. Ibrahim Hooper, national communications director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, told the Forward that he thinks the disparity is a result of the Jewish community being more plugged in.

Forward analysis: Jewish groups get most security grants Read More »

Is Obama Israel’s enemy or defender?

Two interesting emails arrived about the same time on Sunday morning.  One was the text of a speech to the nation by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying Israel owes President Obama “a special measure of gratitude” for his help in rescuing Israelis trapped in their Cairo Embassy by a violent mob.

The other was from a frequent emailer telling me once again that the President of the United States is an enemy of Israel and the Jews.

The latter didn’t compose this scurrilous email himself, but the very act of distributing it to all of his friends and acquaintances constitutes an endorsement.

I usually just hit the delete button, but the timing on this one warranted a response.

It informed me Obama was “mentored by…an avowed Communist,” his mother sent him to “a socialist school,” he really is a Muslim who falsely claims to be a Christian, “he sought the endorsement of the Marxist Party,” he attended a church listening to the preacher “spew hatred for America and preach black liberation theology.”  What’s more, Palestinians in Gaza held a campaign ‘fund raising telethon” for him, he was endorsed by “Louis Farrakhan, Muammar Qadaffi and Hugo Chavez,” and during the National Anthem and Pledge of Allegiance “he stood with his hands over his groin area.” He has appointed gays, socialists, communists and other radicals, used American tax dollars to “resettle thousands of Palestinians from Gaza to the United States,” and “Barrack Hussein Obama is determined to turn America into a Marxist-Socialist society.”

There’s more, but you get the idea.  What’s not mentioned openly is what some of these writers may regard as his greatest offense: He’s black.  How on earth could a black man be elected president unless the vote was rigged?

Not all of those who spread the anti-Obama attacks are racists but may simply be exploiting the racism of others to promote the idea that he is anti-Israel.

Along the way they keep raising the bar on what constitutes pro-Israel. An increasingly strident former colleague said my failure to share his pro-Likud, pro-settlement, anti-Arab viewpoint was “yet another indication of Bloomfield’s own lukewarm support for Israel.” 

Anyone who fails to adhere to their strict dogma becomes a target for right wing extremists. Jerusalem Post columnist Caroline Glick has called Obama “the most hostile US president Israel has ever faced” and possibly “a grave threat.”  Morton Klein of the Zionist Organization of America said the President’s actions suggest “a distaste or even hostility towards Jews and Israel.” And African-American religious right activist, Bishop E.W. Jackson, said Obama’s views of Israel and Jews were shaped by anti-Semitism in the black community, “his Muslim roots and experience in Farrakhan’s Chicago.”

Here’s what happened: A mob ransacked the embassy and was closing in on six Israeli security guards stranded inside.  Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak repeatedly tried to call Egypt’s new strongman, Mohammed Tantawi, but were told he could not be located.  So Netanyahu called Obama, and Barak called Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.

The Prime Minister reported to the Israeli people about Obama’s actions: “I would say it was a decisive moment—fateful, I would even say. He said, ‘I will do all that I can.’ He did that. He applied all of the means and influence of the United States of America, which are certainly substantial. And I think we owe him special thanks.”

The incident, wrote Israeli journalism Shimon Shiffer, “unequivocally demonstrated Israel’s existential dependence on America” despite two-and-a-half years of “constant deterioration in our ties with the White House” under Netanyahu’s leadership.

Netanyahu’s speech may also have been in response to stinging criticism from former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who served in both the Bush and Obama cabinets, that the US has given Netanyahu so much in terms of security and gotten nothing in return. Gates said the prime minister is not only ungrateful but also endangering Israel by refusing to grapple with Israel’s growing isolation and with the demographic challenges it faces by holding on to the West Bank, according to the Atlantic’s Jeff Goldberg.

If Obama is so anti-Israel, why has his administration provided access to top-tech weapons Bush refused, expanded high-level intelligence sharing, given diplomatic cover at the UN, vetoed an anti-settlements resolution, refused to attend the Durban III conference, and is now standing almost alone against the Palestinian statehood bid?

It’s all a ruse, explained one blogger, to lull Israel into dropping its guard so he can surprise it by imposing a peace plan it doesn’t want.

Or maybe the answer is the one provided by an editorial in the politically conservative Orthodox paper Hamodia.  Politico reported Hamodia praised Obama’s “immediate and effective” response to Netanyahu’s call for help, noting. “Much has been made of the strained relations between Netanyahu and the White House in recent days; but in this test of standing by one’s allies in a matter of life and death, Barack Obama came through. He merited to be Hashem’s instrument of salvation. The Jewish community all over the world offers him our heartfelt thanks.”

Is Obama Israel’s enemy or defender? Read More »

The only road to statehood

Last week, a plan of action “to mobilize international support for the Palestinian bid” for United Nations recognition of the state of Palestine was approved at the Arab League meeting in Doha, Qatar.  The Palestinians will formally submit their request for U.N. membership on September 20.

Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat recently announced a “massive” diplomatic campaign to gain U.N. recognition, with visits by Palestinian officials to China, India, Vietnam, Australia, Canada, Russia, Norway, Spain and many other countries.

So instead of sitting down at the negotiating table to work out a durable agreement with Israel, the Palestinians are extending their diplomatic efforts into every part of the globe—except Israel.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ main argument is that a model for achieving statehood via the U.N. already exists, and that the time has come for the international community to give Palestinian Arabs no less than what the Jews of Palestine received more than 60 years ago.

If that model is followed to its logical conclusion and the U.N. General Assembly passes a resolution to establish Palestinian statehood, Abbas could repeat history, reject the offer and opt for war.  That is what happened in 1947 when the U.N. issued a partition plan calling for a two-state solution in the former mandate of Palestine, one for Jews and one for Palestinian Arabs.

Minutes after Israel’s formation, however, six Arab armies invaded the nascent Jewish state in 1948.  The rejection of a Jewish state by the Arabs, Israel’s victory in that war, and Israel’s acceptance in the U.N. all require that the Palestinians deal with Israel to gain full statehood.  It is ironic – and unfortunate – that the Palestinians desire statehood now through an approach they spurned then.

Some argue that this is ancient history – but this was a seminal event. President Abbas obviously believes the 1947 model is relevant today, and he counts on the anti-historical and memory-free approach of others.

World leaders should tell Abbas that the issue of statehood for Palestinians was resolved in 1947, when the Jews of Palestine accepted the partition plan, and that Israeli prime ministers from Ben-Gurion to Netanyahu have agreed with that concept.  The question today is how to achieve a genuine state in a way that produces lasting peace, security and prosperity for both sides.

It is this vision of the future, with a practical explanation of how to get from here to there, which is missing.  There have been recent efforts, of course—notably in 2000 and early 2001 between Ehud Barak and Yasser Arafat, and in 2008 between Ehud Olmert and Mahmoud Abbas. Both ended the same way as 1947: Israel saying “yes,” and the Palestinians saying “no.”

President Abbas should offer his own comprehensive peace plan and bring it to the negotiating table, rather than demand that the UN and the international community agree to an idea everyone already endorsed more than 60 years ago.  That would make history.

Congressman Sherman, a California Democrat, is the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade in the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

The only road to statehood Read More »

Bargain Sites: Not Your Mother’s Coupons

So many coupon sites and mommieblogs are restricted to small stuff like supermarket mac ‘n cheese, diapers, and pet food.  There are more substantial savings to be found if one knows where to look.  Here are just two examples.

” title=”www.fatwallet.com “>www.fatwallet.com Here’s their pitch.  “Saving you money is our foundation and passion.  Go shopping by store and never miss coupons, discounts or cash back on your purchases.  Shopping for something specific? Search by category and know you’re finding the best deal.  Surf today’s deals as they happen with a free community of and for empowered consumers.”

Among some recent listings were

30% off your entire purchase at Banana Republic.

A 60” Mitsubishi HD TV for $699.99 Original price was $1099.99. 

2-Pack Kinsford 20lb. Charcoal Briquettes for $7.97 with Free Shipping.  Was $27.49

Me Like! 

Bargain Sites: Not Your Mother’s Coupons Read More »

Fla. museum told to hold painting allegedly looted by Nazis

A small Florida museum was ordered to hold onto a painting on loan from Italy because it may have been looted by the Nazis.

The Mary Brogan Museum of Art and Science in Tallahassee was notified this summer by the District Attorney’s Office in the Florida capital that the nearly 500-year-old painting —“Christ Carrying the Cross Dragged by a Rogue,” by the Italian Renaissance artist Girolamo Romano—is believed to have been stolen from a Jewish family by the Nazis during World War II.

The grandchildren of the painting’s owner, an Italian Jew named Guiseppe Gentili, contacted the government and the museum directly.

The painting, part of a show at the museum on Baroque painting that just ended, is one of 50 artworks on loan from the Pinacoteca di Brera in Milan, Italy. Its estimated worth is about $2.5 million.

Five other paintings that belonged to Gentili before the war and were sold in a 1941 government auction after the family had fled France were returned to Gentili’s descendants by the Louvre following a long legal battle.

U.S. authorities and the Italian Ministry of Culture are working to determine who owns the painting.

Meanwhile, The Israel Museum announced last week that it had returned a painting to the heirs of its owner after determining that it was looted by the Nazis from a Jewish museum in Germany. “The Return of Tobias,” a 1934 painting by German Jewish artist Max Liebermann, was sent back to Liebermann’s estate by the museum.

Liebermann had lent his painting to the Jewish Museum in Berlin in the 1930s. It was given to the Bezalel National Museum in Jerusalem in the 1950s after no owner came forward to claim it.

The work is among 12 pieces that the Israel Museum was sending on loan to a museum in Germany. Background research conducted on the piece before it was sent determined that the piece had been on loan to the German museum from which it was looted and that it should be returned to the artists’ heirs.

Fla. museum told to hold painting allegedly looted by Nazis Read More »

Russia says it backs Palestinian U.N. statehood bid

Russia will support the Palestinian Authority’s statehood bid at the United Nations next week.

Russia’s ambassador to the U.N., Vitaly Churkin, made the announcement Monday, saying Russia would vote in favor of the Palestinian state in the Security Council, where as a permanent member Russia holds a veto, and in the General Assembly, where a majority of states have already said they would support the bid.

“We will endorse any proposals submitted by the Palestinians,” Churkin reportedly said in a television interview, according to Russia’s Interfax news agency.

Russia joins China, which also wields a veto in the Security Council, in its support of a Palestinian state. The United States has said it would use its veto to prevent Security Council action.

Russia says it backs Palestinian U.N. statehood bid Read More »

Rabbis, scholars compile materials to guide civility drive

A group of leading rabbis and scholars has compiled sermons and other materials to help Jewish leaders talk about civility during the High Holidays and all year.

The civility materials, which include religious texts and study materials, were prepared by a working group composed of rabbis and scholars from across the Jewish religious spectrum under the auspices of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs.

They are part of the Campaign for Civility that JCPA launched in 2010 and can be found on the JCPA website.

“Increasingly, conversations are giving way to diatribe. We can do better,” said JCPA President Rabbi Steve Gutow. “We hope that these materials will be used as a resource by synagogues, rabbis, schools, and throughout the Jewish community to help build understanding about the Jewish value of civil discourse.

“Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur are times for self reflection, a time when confessional prayers and study help us to focus on issues of listening and speech. It is a perfect opportunity to evaluate just how we have used our power of speech and how we might choose our words in ways that engender greater cohesiveness and mutual respect.”

Rabbis, scholars compile materials to guide civility drive Read More »

At a rebuilt AMIA Jewish center, Argentinians remember 9/11 victims

A 9/11 memorial ceremony at the AMIA Jewish center in Buenos Aires called for common cause in halting terrorist attacks.

Among those attending the commemoration ceremony Monday at the rebuilt AMIA headquarters were the U.S. ambassador in Argentina, Vilma Martinez; representatives of Spain, Germany, Ireland, Uruguay, Poland and Israel; and executives from American Airlines and United Airlines, whose planes were used in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Another flight went down in Pennsylvania.

“It is affecting to meet here at the site of the AMIA bombing, a grim reminder of terrorist attacks,” Martinez said. “We value deeply our common reason to fight against terrorism and remember its victims.”

AMIA President Angel Barman referred to this common cause, saying that the world should do more to face terrorism together.

“I think we have not done enough, our diplomats and authorities have not done enough,” he said.

Olga Degtiar, representing Families of Victims and Friends of the AMIA Bombing group, said that the images 10 years later of the 9/11 attacks makes her remember her own images from 17 years ago, when the AMIA building was destroyed in an attack on July 18, 1994 that killed 85 and injured hundreds.

“It’s the same hate and destruction,” said the mother of Cristian Degtian, a teenager killed in the AMIA bombing. “When we saw this building destroyed … [and] knowing that beneath the rubble was my son.”

Adriana Reisfeld, Active Memory president, noted a major difference between the tributes held in New York and in Buenos Aires for the AMIA bombing.

“In the United States both presidents (George Bush and Barack Obama) participated and representatives of different religions; they can be together because they know exactly who is responsible for the attacks,” she said. “After 17 years in Argentina we don’t have assurance of who are the responsible parties.”

Though Argentina has accused the Iranian government of directing the bombing and the Lebanon-based terror group Hezbollah of carrying it out, no arrests have been made in the case. Six Iranians have been on the Interpol international police agency’s most wanted list since 2007 in connection with the bombing, including the current Iranian defense minister, Gen. Ahmed Vahidi.

At a rebuilt AMIA Jewish center, Argentinians remember 9/11 victims Read More »