fbpx

May 26, 2011

Witness: Pakistani intelligence official ordered Chabad house attack

Pakistani government intelligence official directed terrorists to attack the Mumbai Chabad house in their November 2008 rampage through the Indian city, a witness in the terror trial testified.

David Coleman Headley, a Pakistani American who has confessed to conducting surveillance on the site and other targets in Mumbai for the Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorist group, gave the testimony in Chicago federal court Tuesday at the trial of an alleged accomplice.

Headley testified that his handler was an official of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate identified as Major Iqbal.

“Major Iqbal told me the Chabad house would be added on whatever list” of targets, Headley said, “because it was a front office for the Mossad.”

There is no evidence for the assertion of a link between the Chabad house and the Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence service.

Pakistan has denied involvement in the Mumbai attacks, which left at least 164 people dead. Six people, including three Americans, were murdered at the Chabad house.

Witness: Pakistani intelligence official ordered Chabad house attack Read More »

Pro-Israel, pro-Palestinian students at Calif. campus join to blast activist

Pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups at the University of California, Santa Barbara issued a joint letter condemning a conservative activist’s attacks on the school’s Muslim student group.

The letter criticizing David Horowitz, founder of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, was signed by the Santa Barbara Hillel and UCSB American Students for Israel along with the campus’ Muslim Student Association and its chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine.

It was published Thursday in the campus newspaper in advance of a scheduled address by Horowitz that evening titled “Infantile Disorders at UCSB: Why the Muslim Students Association is Afraid of David Horowitz.” The campus’ College Republicans chapter is sponsoring the address.

“The UCSB MSA is an incredibly valuable member of our campus, has been involved in numerous interfaith dialogues and provides a cultural and religious home to a large segment of the UCSB Muslim community,” the four groups wrote in their letter to The Daily Nexus. They suggested that Horowitz’s event would promote “bigotry and prejudice.”

Tensions between pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian students have run high at many California colleges, notably . For instance, the Muslim student group at the University of California, Irvine down the Pacific coast has sponsored events featuring anti-Semitic rhetoric, praise for anti-Israel terrorism and calls for Israel’s destruction.

Rabbi Evan Goodman, executive director of the Santa Barbara Hillel, told JTA that relations between Muslim and Jewish students have been good on his campus of late.

“Over the last two years we’ve worked very hard to develop positive relationships between Jewish and Muslim students on and off campus,” Goodman said, adding that “The Muslim Student Association has been helpful in working with us to combat bigotry on campus in all forms.”

Pro-Israel, pro-Palestinian students at Calif. campus join to blast activist Read More »

In helping Palestinians, IDF paramedics defy stereotypes

Yana Kisluk tosses her long ponytail over one shoulder and adjusts her M-16 over the other.

The pretty 21-year-old, who wears diamond stud earrings and perfect eye makeup, looks like any other young Israeli doing her compulsory military service.

As a paramedic in the Israel Defense Forces, however, Kisluk belongs to a small group of Israeli soldiers whose job is to provide care for Palestinians rather than simply defend against them.

On a recent morning, Kisluk’s team of two paramedics and a driver get a call about a newly arrested Palestinian prisoner who says he is diabetic and needs a check of his glucose level. Kisluk and her colleague, Hagai Hayat, climb into the ambulance and set off to the nearby military jail.

The prisoner, Adnan Abu Tabeineh, a lecturer in history at the Open University in Hebron, is brought in, his legs shackled.

“I feel very dizzy,” he tells the paramedics in broken Hebrew.

“Did you take your medicine today?” Kisluk asks.

“No,” Tabeineh answers. “I have one medicine with me that the soldiers took away and another that I left at home.”

Kisluk pricks his finger and measures his sugar level. It is 310, well above normal.

“He needs to take his medicine now,” she tells the Israeli soldiers at the jail. “You need to make sure he gets his other medicine from home.”

“Just take your pill and you’ll be fine,” she reassures Tabeineh.

There is no talk about why he has been detained; the soldiers decline to answer a reporter’s questions.

Twenty minutes later, Kisluk and Hagai are back on the ambulance, heading for their base and lunch.

Kisluk, who immigrated with her family to Israel as an infant, says she keeps her political opinions and her army service separate.

“Sometimes we don’t even know if someone is Arab or Jewish,” she says. “We just treat whoever needs it the most.”

Hagai, a gentle soldier with dark hair and dark eyes, remembers a recent drive-by shooting attack in the West Bank that left four Israelis dead.

“As soon as we got the call, we started speeding there, putting on flak jackets and helmets,” he says. “We were the second team to arrive and the casualties were lying on the ground. I went over to each of them but they had no pulse. I did an EKG and saw that it was impossible to revive them. It was so difficult. I have all of this training and I couldn’t do anything.”

The paramedics spend 14 months in an intensive course and then must agree to serve for at least two more years in the army. For Kisluk, that means serving one year longer than most women. But she sees it as good preparation for a future career in medicine.

“Sometimes I laugh when I think that people my age in the U.S. are almost done with college and I haven’t even started,” she says. “But that’s just the way it is in Israel. I do feel that I’m doing something meaningful here.”

The paramedics, whose primary purpose is to care for Israeli soldiers, cooperate with local Israeli and Palestinian rescue services. For security reasons they are not allowed to enter Arab towns or villages. Medical services are provided there by the Red Crescent, which is affiliated with the Red Cross.

In the parts of the West Bank that are either under sole Israeli control or joint Israeli-Palestinian control, the paramedics will not enter Arab villages but often treat victims of car accidents on the main roads. Palestinians will even bring family members who need immediate medical attention to the gates of army bases, and the paramedics will come out to treat them.

Betty Ben Zaken, 21, who is responsible for the 11 paramedics in the West Bank, says they treated 115 Palestinians in 2010.

She says the Israeli soldiers take precautions to ensure that potential patients are not terrorists.

“We wear helmets and flak jackets to protect ourselves,” Ben Zaken says. “But we also took an oath to treat anyone who needs it, and that comes first.”

Last month, an Israeli paramedic helped a Palestinian woman give birth at an Israeli checkpoint. Human rights groups have charged that Palestinian women often are delayed at checkpoints and forced to give birth there. Israeli officials say they do everything possible to speed their passage through, but ambulances, which in the past have been used to smuggle weapons, must be checked.

Ben Zaken says they help with at least one Palestinian birth per month. Earlier this month, she says, family members brought an elderly man having a heart attack to the army base and the paramedics were able to save his life.

“I think it helps to show Palestinians that some Israeli soldiers just want to help,” she says. “I hope that it influences how they think of us.”

In helping Palestinians, IDF paramedics defy stereotypes Read More »

Toronto rules for anti-Israel group in Gay Pride parade flap

A Toronto committee voted that the participation of an anti-Israel group in the city’s annual Gay Pride parade does not violate anti-discrimination rules.

After months of debate, Toronto’s executive committee voted unanimously May 24 to back a report by the city manager, which ruled that the term “Israeli apartheid” does not violate Toronto’s anti-discrimination policies, and that public funding for the parade should not be contingent on the participation of Queers Against Israeli Apartheid.

The controversy has been brewing since last summer, when some City Council members joined Jewish officials to question whether the participation of Queers Against Israeli Apartheid in the annual Pride festival should warrant the revocation of city funding for the event.

Last year, Pride received a $123,807 city grant and $245,000 worth of services, such as litter cleanup and police services. Municipal support amounts to about one quarter of the festival’s budget.

In April, Queers Against Israeli Apartheid promised not to participate in this year’s festivities. But some City Council members called that pledge insufficient.

Funding for this summer’s parade will be determined after the event, council member Giorgio Mammoliti told the media following the executive committee meeting.

“QAIA better stay away,” Mammoliti was quoted as saying in Toronto’s gay newspaper, Xtra. “If they think they can do what they want at the expense of the taxpayer, they’re wrong.”

Mammoliti added, “This councillor will defend the Jewish community, and I’ll do it in an aggressive way.”

Len Rudner of the Canadian Jewish Congress said he disagrees with the city manager’s report.

“In Canada it is possible to be anti-Semitic and homophobic and yet not break the law,” Rudner told the Toronto Sun. “The question should not be whether such statements are legal or not but whether they accord with the values, in this case, of the City of Toronto.”

But if Toronto wants to wait until after the parade to allocate funding, he said, “that’s certainly within their rights.”

“Our concern has always been with the parade, Rudner said. “We would like the city to be able to emphasize the fact that the messages of Queers Against Israeli Apartheid and calling Israel an apartheid state have no place in the Pride parade.”

Toronto rules for anti-Israel group in Gay Pride parade flap Read More »

Kirk and Anne Douglas give $2 million to L.A. theater group

“Theatre was always my first love,” Kirk Douglas said in a statement announcing a major financial gift to L.A.’s Center Theater Group. His wistfulness came through, even in a press release. “In fact, when I came to Hollywood to make my first picture, I thought it was just a temporary detour. I would earn enough money to tide my family over only until my first long-run hit on Broadway…

“That never happened,” he added, “and I soon resigned myself (believe me, it wasn’t hard) to being a movie star.”

Along with a healthy dose of talent, that stardom led to three Oscar nominations, an honorary Oscar for Lifetime Achievement and the accumulation of great fortune. The 93-year-old’s film success also enabled him to establish The Douglas Foundation, which in 2004 provided $2.5 million in seed funding to transform a defunct Culver City movie house into what is now The Kirk Douglas Theatre. Since then, the 317-seat theatre has focused on nurturing new and emerging artists and has helped land two major works—“Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo” and the musical “13”—on Broadway. In fact, after an intensive workshop at the theatre, Douglas and his wife, Anne contributed $250,000 to launch the world premiere of “13” at Center Theatre Group’s Mark Taper Forum in Downtown L.A.

The Douglas’s latest gift, a $1 million challenge grant aimed at raising additional funds for the theatre, follows a previous $1 million seed grant for developing new work.

In addition to world premieres of “Bloody Bloody Andrew Jackson,” “The Wake,” and the revival of “Come Back, Little Sheba,” Douglas’s namesake theatre also played host to the actor’s autobiographical show, “Before I Forget” in March 2009.

Only the man who played Spartacus could sustain such stamina as a nonagenarian.

Kirk and Anne Douglas give $2 million to L.A. theater group Read More »

Train Rocks the Jews [VIDEO]

Last night at the tail end of a huge Jewish Federation banquet, at least 2/3 of the 1300 guests had left the cavernous Barker Hanger venue, the night was winding down, and it looked like nothing in the world would bring the dwindling crowd back to life.

Then Federation President Jay Sanderson took the mike and called the band Train onto stage. 

And then, as the Man says, there was light.

Lead singer Pat Monhan started in on “Soul Sister,” and those who were left leapt to their feet and raced to the stage.  The band ripped through all the hits, Soul Sister, “Marry Me,” “Drops of Jupiter,” “Calling All Angels,” and it was like music magic.  Old Jews, young Jews, non-Jews, people who were fans (like me), people who wouldn’t know Train from Paul Anka, they turned into a frenzied tribe.  It wasn’t clear Monahan knew where he was or who he was singing to—he thanked “the Jewish society”—but the man knows his craft.  He bounces around the stage skinny as Jagger but a lot less threatening/druggy/wizened, and then jumped down into the crowd and posed for pictures as he sang, and just WORKED it.

Why is this a Howard Stern blog post?  Because Train credits Howard with sticking by them when their carerre tanked, with constantly promoting them, with SAVING them.  Howard has done deep, moving interviews with Pat, who I came to feel I knew through the show.  Howard certainly turned a world of fans, like me, onto Train.

I iPhoned a bit of the finale, just so you can get a taste of how great the moment was.

Thanks, Howard.

 

Train Rocks the Jews [VIDEO] Read More »

Why is President Obama Ignoring Black Africa?

The most frustrating thing for me about President Obama’s foreign policy is that he is letting an obsession with issues in the Middle East take him away from the most pressing and devastating humanitarian issues going on in the world: Darfur – where hundreds of thousands of people are facing starvation and bombings – a brewing civil war between North Sudan and the soon-to-be independent South Sudan, including plans for ethnic cleansing and worse, and most of all the horrific murder and rape campaigns going on now in the Democratic Republic of Congo.  A recent U.S. study, released May 12, estimated that during the study’s one-year time frame, between 2006 and 2007, 400,000 women were raped in the Congo, or 26 times higher than what the United Nations has been reporting.  400,000 rapes!  In one year!

How can anyone excuse talking about the plight of anyone in the world – whether it is the Palestinians or anyone else – when there are 400,000 women being raped in one area in one year.  Shameful!  We are spending hundreds of millions of dollars on helping a unknown group of rebels in Libya while we are ignoring millions of women being raped, and thousands of men, women and children being killed,per year? 
If you are Jewish, whether on the Left or the Right, you have every right to obsess on Israel – that is your religious, cultural and national obligation.  And if you are Palestinian, by all means you can complain about Israeli checkpoints which are forcing people to spend hours in traffic getting to work, or a security fence which is separating you from your friends and relatives.  But if you are not either Israeli, Jewish, Arab or Palestinian, then you have no right to focus on Israel and Palestinians or even Libyans or Syrians or Bahrainis while hundreds of thousands are experiencing death and rape and genocide in sub-Saharan Africa.  It is morally repugnant for our first African American president to be ignoring the worst humanitarian crises in our world, simply because the Arab world and the Palestinians, and many Jews, are “dreying his kup” – are distracting him – for their own interests.  President Obama needs to set the moral agenda of America and prioritize the areas that truly need our humanitarian attention: Sub-Saharan Africa, Sudan – not Israel or the Middle East.
And to the Jewish community I have a message: If we want the Administration to continue to obsess on Israel-Palestinian peace, we just need to remember that we are being selfish; we need to remember that for every hour Obama has to meet Netanyahu to pressure him, that is an hour that hundreds of more women are being raped in the Congo and another hour closer to finishing the genocide in Darfur.  We may feel that getting Israel out of the West Bank is worth it, or ending the occupation for West Bank Palestinians is worth it, but when the tally of deaths and rapes in Africa is taken, I hope it is not on our heads that the leader of the free world ignored his own homeland and left them to continue living in a hell of rapes, killings and destruction. May God open our eyes and hearts to the suffering of our fellow human beings in Africa, and make sure our President is addressing this moral imperative as he should. 

Rabbi Asher Lopatin

Why is President Obama Ignoring Black Africa? Read More »

San Francisco’s Curious Attachment to the Male Foreskin

I’ve always thought of San Francisco as the very paragon of a live-and-let-live city. But it turns out if has a curious attachment to the male foreskin. This November, believe it or not, a measure will be on the ballot to ban circumcision for all males under the sage of 18, making it an offense punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 or up to one year in jail. Talk about putting skin in the game.

When I lived in Western Europe for 11 years it was common to hear attacks on circumcision, which for a great many was an effective substitute for direct attacks on Jews. Whenever you want to demean an ethnic group you first infer that there is something not-quite-right about their sexuality as a form of humiliation. So it’s to be expected that those who have a problem with Jews make a habit of criticizing circumcision. But I have always wondered why, when it comes to sexual ethnic stereotypes designed to categorize groups, we Jews, as opposed to say, African-Americans, always get the short end of the stick.

Efforts to delegitimize circumcision as a barbaric act and make it illegal are de rigueur on the other side of the Atlantic. In August, 2006 a Finnish court ruled that a Muslim mother who had circumcised her four-year-old boy was guilty of an illegal assault, and in 2010 a Jewish couple in Finland were fined for causing bodily harm to their son when he was circumcised by a mohel from the UK. Leave it to the Finns to further their claims as catalysts for Middle-East peace by bringing together Muslims and Jews as common brothers in circumcision persecution.

Sweden has a reputation of being a pretty laid-back nation but it stiffens in the face of circumcision. In 2001 when it enacted a draconian law requiring a medical doctor or an anesthesia nurse to accompany a registered circumciser and for an anesthetic to be applied to a baby beforehand. Swedish Jews and Muslim banded together to object and the World Jewish Congress condemned the law as “the first legal restriction on Jewish religious practice in Europe since the Nazi era.”

But all these attempts to ban circumcision belie the medical facts. Circumcision has now been proven as the most effective means by which to stop the transmission of HIV-AIDS, with the British Medical Journal reporting that circumcised men are 8 times less likely to contract the infection. Circumcision removes what are called Langerhans cells that exist in the foreskin and which are susceptible to HIV. Langerhans cells have special receptors that may grant the virus access into the body.

Circumcision also significantly reduces the transmission of other STD’s like genital herpes and syphilis and also reduces the risk of urinary-tract infection. Men who are circumcised have 100 percent immunity from contracting penile cancer which, though rare, is best probably best avoided completely.

Male circumcision is also much healthier for women and significantly reduces the risk of cervical cancer by at least twenty percent, according to according to an article in the British Medical Journal of April 2002. Cancer of the cervix in women is due to the Human Papilloma Virus. It thrives under and on the foreskin from where it can be transmitted during intercourse.

So if the medical benefits of circumcision are so clear, why the effort to ban it? Simple. This is part of an ongoing fanatical secular assault that seeks to portray religion as a giant party-pooper, hell-bent on crushing any pleasure in sex and reducing copulation to nothing more a cold and sterile act of baby-making.

Hence, opponents of male circumcision are in the habit of comparing it to the horrors of female circumcision or clitoridectomy. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth. The latter involves the removal of the clitoris so as to deny a woman any form of sexual pleasure and is expressly condemned as an abomination by every major world religion. But the removal of the foreskin actually increases sexual sensitivity in the penis, or so I am told, as I have no actual experience with a foreskin.

The lie that religion frowns on sexual pleasure is widespread. In fact, deeply fulfilling, ecstatic, and orgasmic sex is a must in Jewish law which makes it a sin for a man to have sex with his wife without ensuring she climaxes first. Judaism insists that sex be accompanied by exhilaration and pleasure as a bonding experience that leads to emotional connection and intimacy.

Indeed, we Jews could teach even the highly sexually adventurous people of the Golden Gate City a thing or two about great sex, the proof of which is that we alone, among all the nations of the world, are still here after thousands of years, due to the fact that our circumcised ancestors have never stopped doing it.

Yes, when it comes to shout-out-loud, amazing, electrifying, unforgettable, take-me-to-the-moon-and-back sex, circumcised men are quite simply a cut above.

Shmuley Boteach, “America’s Rabbi,”  is author of the international best-sellers “Kosher Sex,” “Kosher Adultery,” and “The Kosher Sutra,” and will soon publish the series climax, “Kosher Ecstasy.” Follow him on Twitter @RabbiShmuley.

San Francisco’s Curious Attachment to the Male Foreskin Read More »

Pilot interfaith outreach program set for Chicago

A project to help interfaith families connect Jewishly will launch soon in Chicago.

InterfaithFamily.com announced it has secured funding for InterfaithFamily/Chicago, a two-year pilot program aimed at helping Chicago-area intermarried families find Jewish resources and connect with the community.

The program will include a website offering local and national resources for intermarried couples making Jewish choices, inclusivity training for Jewish professionals and lay leaders, and online as well as in-person classes for the families involved.

A full-time director will start July 1, said Ed Case, CEO of Interfaith Family.com.

The training will start in the fall, and workshops for couples will be held twice this year. Programs will be coordinated with existing resources provided by local synagogues, religious movements and Jewish institutions.

“When proven successful, the Chicago pilot will be replicable around North America, filling the missing link of local community programs in the interfaith engagement field,” Case said.

Supporters include The Crown Family, the Marcus Foundation, and the Jack and Goldie Wolfe Miller Fund.

InterfaithFamily.com is a Boston-based organization that empowers people in interfaith relationships to engage in Jewish life and encourages Jewish communities to welcome them.

Pilot interfaith outreach program set for Chicago Read More »