fbpx

October 20, 2010

Breast cancer care: With so many treatment choices, where to turn?

Dr. Laura Kruper knows the surgery she’s suggesting is a slim silver lining to an otherwise devastating diagnosis. Nevertheless, she says, when the right patients come in to her office facing breast cancer, she tells them, “We have a great option for you. …”

Kruper is a breast surgeon at City of Hope in Duarte, one of the nation’s leading cancer research centers. The surgery she occasionally suggests is oncoplastic reduction surgery, in which the surgeon removes the tumor from the affected breast, and then reduces the other, noncancerous breast to ensure a post-surgical cosmetic match.

It’s not something that all hospitals are prepared to do: “Some people don’t feel comfortable with it,” she said.

But for women with large breasts, the surgery — in addition to achieving its primary goal of removing cancer — can mean breast reduction, with its relief from a lifetime of stretch marks and back pain. And Kruper is happy to be able to offer it. She is one of hundreds of breast cancer experts in Southern California offering procedures that have not yet hit the mainstream — and oncoplastic reduction is just such a practice. With a little research, women facing a breast cancer diagnosis can find a treatment center that provides care to meet their specific needs.

To that end, Kruper said, having so many facilities in Southern California is good for patients. “It does help having different centers,” she said. “Different centers do different things — having access to [them] allows women to have choices.”

Although the choices can seem overwhelming, if you think you have breast cancer you need to consider your options for diagnosis and treatment. A good place to begin comparing providers is to see whether they meet existing standards of care.

What is the standard of care?

Dr. Larry Norton spent 20 years helping to develop the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York. The center is one of the largest and most comprehensive breast centers in the country, and Norton believes that all patients should have access to this level of care.

“What should be offered is the whole comprehensive package,” he said, from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to follow-up.

Hospitals should be equipped with screening tools, including mammography, ultrasound and genetic counseling for women with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer. For higher-risk women, including those with a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation — which predisposes for breast, ovarian and prostate cancer and occurs disproportionately in American Jewish women — many facilities offer MRIs, which can detect abnormalities in the breast that might not show up using other screening methods.

Breast cancer treatment begins only after a tumor has been properly classified by stage — classified as I-IV, with IV being the most advanced — and type, including hormone-receptive; HER2-positive, which means that the tumor tests positive for a protein called HER2 and may be more aggressive; or triple negative, which often means that doctors don’t know the underlying cause of the cancer. Each type of tumor may indicate a different course of treatment.

Most breast cancer patients are treated with some combination of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. In surgery, doctors often try to conserve as much of the breast as possible, and to that end, these days, lumpectomies have replaced mastectomies whenever possible.

To find out whether cancer has spread to the rest of the body, standard procedure has recently dictated testing only the first, or sentinel, lymph node that the cancer would hit once it leaves the place of origin in the breast. If the sentinel node tests positive for cancer, other lymph nodes are tested as well. If not, it’s typically considered contained.

When evaluating a hospital, it’s important to be sure that it complies with these existing standards. Additionally, a 1998 study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that breast cancer patients had a greater chance of survival if they were treated by hospitals that have performed a high number of surgeries.

Some local hospitals are also pioneering techniques that have not necessarily been adopted internationally. Many have been proven safe and effective and simply have yet to catch on, and some are still in trials. Here are some trends in local facilities:

Advances in Minimally Invasive Care

To hear surgeon Dennis Holmes discuss breast-conserving options in cancer care is to understand a driving force in the medical community — compassion. In a calm, patient voice, the young surgeon explains his personal philosophy: “My approach to breast cancer surgery is, I want to provide effective therapy by reducing the burden of treatment as well as side effects,” he said.

Holmes, who serves as the director of intraoperative radiotherapy at The University of Southern California Kenneth Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital, is working to institute intraoperative radiation therapy, in which patients receive their entire course of radiation therapy in one dose, while still under anesthesia from surgery to remove their cancer.

To qualify for intraoperative radiation treatment, a patient must be in the early stages of the disease. But women with early-stage cancer aren’t the only patients who may benefit from advances in minimally invasive care.

“We are doing nipple-sparing mastectomy on BRCA carriers,” said Dr. Alice Chung, assistant director of the John Wayne Cancer Institute Breast Center at Saint John’s Health Center in Santa Monica, taking time out to discuss the procedure in a spare 30 minutes between meetings.

The goal of nipple-sparing mastectomy, which leaves as much of the nipple intact as possible while removing the majority of the breast tissue, is to maintain sensation in the nipple, as well as erectile ability, in women whose cancers allow it to be done safely. 

Because the technique requires a certain level of expertise, Chung said, “it’s becoming more common, but it’s not something everyone does.”

Difficult-to-Treat Tumors

It can be hard to get medical experts riled up, even when discussing major advances in their field. To that end, Dr. William Audeh, the medical director of the Samuel Oschin Cancer Center at Cedars-Sinai, is hesitant to get too excited when explaining one of the more promising cancer treatments currently being studied — the use of PARP inhibitors, which target DNA at the root of cancer.

“It seems to be promising,” he said by phone, explaining the phase II trial that he co-authored for The Lancet earlier this year.

But to call it “promising” is a bit of an understatement. PARP inhibitors have shown results that have eluded the most potent chemotherapy combinations in women with very difficult to treat tumors, such as those advanced by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, or triple-negative tumors.

When used in conjunction with chemotherapy treatments — some on women who had already received up to 10 rounds of chemotherapy — PARP inhibitors tripled the tumor’s response rate.

“Tripling the response rate is something you just don’t see very often,” Audeh said.

Cedars-Sinai is now one of several international hospitals enrolling patients in a follow-up trial that will attempt to confirm the benefits of PARP inhibitors.

“We’re hoping that we’re going to find more definitely that it’s working,” Audeh said, “so that it might become available as an approved drug.”

Individualized Care and One-Stop Shopping

One of the most noticeable changes in breast cancer care over the past decade or so, says Dr. Edward Phillips, director of the Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and director of Endoscopic Surgery for the Department of Surgery at Cedars-Sinai, is that all cancers are not treated equally.

“The real change is the individualization of breast cancer treatment,” he said. “There are a lot of individual decisions — different from your mother, girlfriend, even your sister.”

To address the continually evolving ways in which breast cancer is diagnosed, most local hospitals now examine each case with a full team of experts, including a surgeon, a radiation oncologist, a medical oncologist and a plastic surgeon.

“A coordinated approach is critically important,” Norton said. “The medical oncologists have to be connected to the surgeons” and so on.

Many centers also offer a “one-stop shop,” in which patients can visit with their entire medical team as well as social workers and psychiatrists, and in some instances, alternative health practitioners and purveyors of prostheses, wigs, scarves and clothing, such as bathing suits.

What Southern California Offers

With that in mind, some of the leading hospitals in the country are in the Southern California area.

All are up to speed with the standard. Where they tend to differ is in the goals of their leadership and the direction of their research and clinical trials. In selecting a center for care, these are the details that set one institution apart from another.

Revlon/UCLA Breast Center and Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center

Dr. Helena Chang, director of the Revlon/UCLA Breast Center at the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, took over her current position in 1997, following the departure of the outspoken Dr. Susan Love. By comparison, Chang is quiet and speaks quickly in scientific terms about her research and the center.

But her clinical demeanor masks a deep commitment to her patients. In a Los Angeles Times article announcing her appointment, a former patient called Chang “kind and compassionate” and mentioned that at one point following her treatment, the two spoke on the phone for half an hour.

Chang’s research, and her work at the Revlon center, has included a focus on patients with later-stage or more difficult-to-treat cancers, such as recurring cancers and triple-negative tumors, as well as biomarkers for earlier detection.

“One of the questions is, when the tumor is advanced, what is the best treatment?” Chang said. “We can always give them the chemotherapy, but not everyone responds well.”

Located on the university’s Westwood campus, the center focuses on a comprehensive approach to care. The Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center performed 595 breast surgeries in 2009, and the center is ranked 10th in cancer care nationally by U.S. News and World Report.

John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John’s Health Center

Founded in 1981, the John Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John’s Health Center was originally affiliated with UCLA. In 1991, the institute broke away from UCLA and formed an affiliation with Saint John’s Health Center.

The center is headed by Dr. Armando Giuliano, who is internationally recognized for successfully pioneering efforts to standardize the use of sentinel lymph node biopsies. Much of his work with this procedure was published in the mid- to late 1990s, and the practice is now considered the standard of care.

The center also specializes in breast-conserving mastectomies, as well as nipple-sparing mastectomies.

Each year, John Wayne Cancer Institute — a 236-bed facility — performs approximately 150 breast cancer-related surgeries.

University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital

The USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital, located on the USC medical campus near Boyle Heights, is one of the few hospitals in the area designated by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as a comprehensive cancer center, a recognition of cancer facilities for research and patient care. In addition, comprehensive cancer centers educate health-care professionals and the public, and reach out to underserved populations.

Last year, Dr. Debasish Tripathy joined Dr. Michael Press as co-leader of the Women’s Cancer Program at the university. According to a statement from the hospital, Tripathy plans to focus on “increasing the number of treatment and clinical trial options for patients; developing a clinical trials and research program that matches the needs of patients and interfaces with the areas of scientific excellence at USC; setting up community outreach programs and forums” at USC.

The hospital is home to the Harold E. and Henrietta C. Lee Breast Center. USC was unable to provide the number of breast cancer-related surgeries that it performs each year.

City of Hope

As one of the largest cancer research centers in the country, City of Hope is also designated by the NCI as a comprehensive cancer center. The facility offers a number of clinical trials, and in addition to the surgical advances made by doctors like Kruper, advances are being made in the areas of chemotherapy and radiation. 

Located about 30 minutes northeast of downtown Los Angeles, City of Hope is ranked 20th in cancer care by U.S. News and World Report.

The center is also a leader in clinical trials — the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) reports that the national average for patient enrollment in trials is 5 percent. At City of Hope, 25 percent of patients are currently enrolled in a trial.

“At a big academic center, everybody works together as a team,” Kruper said, adding that treatment at a center such as City of Hope can be particularly productive for patients with unusual cancers, aggressive cancers or cancers that appear in very young patients.

City of Hope was unable to provide the number of breast cancer-related surgeries it performs each year.

Huntington Memorial Hospital

To stand out as a community hospital among several large, urban academic medical centers is no small feat, yet Huntington Hospital was listed by a representative from City of Hope as a leader in breast cancer care.

Located in Pasadena, the 636-bed hospital performed 2,100 breast cancer-related surgeries in 2009. The hospital offers permission to conduct surgeries to experts from local academic and research centers, including USC, City of Hope and UCLA. All breast cancer surgeries performed on site are done by surgeons affiliated with outside facilities.

To assist patients in navigating their care, Huntington has two dedicated breast cancer nurse navigators on staff who “work directly with the doctors and interface with the patients and the families to help direct their treatment,” said Maury Kulwin, the executive director of the hospital’s ambulatory and cancer services.

For patients who want to explore alternative therapies, Huntington launched a program to provide acupuncture on site in April of this year. Once a week, Dr. Paulette Saddler offers the procedure to patients to help combat the side effects of cancer therapy.

Acupuncture can “help people with the fatigue, help relieve symptoms of nausea, to manage lymphedema, [a chronic condition in which the arm swells as a result of lymph node removal] as well as joint pain from the medications and hot flashes,” Saddler said.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Located east of Beverly Hills, Cedars-Sinai, with its Saul and Joyce Brandman Breast Center, is one of the largest medical facilities in the Los Angeles area, performing more than 3,000 breast-related surgeries each year, with 95 percent of those done on an outpatient basis.

The hospital has upcoming trials that will focus on risk reduction in underserved communities and, separately, molecular breast imaging for early detection.

“We’re trying to identify women at higher risk in underserved areas, and then intervene with a more robust survey” that would “assess their risk and be able to empower them to make lifestyle changes,” Phillips said.

Cedars-Sinai has also recently partnered with the Christina Applegate Foundation to provide MRIs to high-risk women. 

The program hopes to target “women under 45 who have a history of breast cancer, or who carry BRCA mutations, women who aren’t covered by insurance or have a high deductible,” said Cindy Chavira, the breast center program manager. “We look at the need and then will approve these women to assist with MRI.”

Hoag Hospital Newport Beach

Located south of Los Angeles, the Breast Care Center at Hoag Hospital Newport Beach performs approximately 1,000 breast cancer-related surgeries per year and is led by Dr. Melvin Silverstein.

Silverstein is an expert in several areas of breast cancer research, including needle biopsies, oncoplastic reduction and cancer that is contained within the milk duct.

In 2009, Silverstein published an editorial in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons titled “Where’s the Outrage?” expressing his indignation over the fact that so many breast cancers in the United States are still biopsied using open surgery rather than needles.

“Since about 80 percent of breast [tumors] are benign, it’s not a good idea” to open the breast simply for a biopsy, he said.

To that end, nearly 99 percent of breast biopsies performed at Hoag Memorial are done using a needle, as opposed to the national average of approximately 66 percent, Silverstein said. The doctor also trains fellows from USC to perform Oncoplastic reduction surgery.

Breast cancer care: With so many treatment choices, where to turn? Read More »

Lingering downturn brings new challenges for relief agencies, clients

The staff at Jewish Vocational Service (JVS) is beginning to feel the fatigue. For more than two years, they have marshaled all their resources to deal with a steep increase in demand for their services in helping people find jobs.

But as the economic downturn continues and unemployment in Los Angeles County hovers just below 13 percent, the staff members, like their clients, are becoming more and more desperate.

“Every entry point in our system — someone on welfare, someone accessing our training program, someone attending our computer skills class, someone coming to career services — is impacted to such a point of desperation,” said Claudia Finkel, chief operating officer for JVS. “The clients we’re seeing and the level of skills we’re seeing in individuals is just astonishing.”

The reality of long-term unemployment, underemployment or pay cuts is filtering through the entire Jewish social service system.

Safety-net agencies all report seeing a new sort of client.

“The second wave of pain is hitting in a dramatic way,” Andrew Cushnir, executive vice president and chief programming officer for The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, said. “We’re seeing people who have spent their savings; they’ve drawn down their retirement funds; they’ve exhausted the capacity of family members to support them. And now, people are coming forward at a point where they’d never imagined they would be in their lives.”

These clients are being integrated into a network of Jewish social service agencies that, although stretched increasingly thin, has been lauded for its targeted and comprehensive response.

In March 2009, Federation launched its Emergency Cash Grant program, which has by now distributed almost $1.5 million in one-time infusions of between $750 and $1,800 directly to individuals and families to cover medical expenses, housing costs, food, employment support or emergency childcare.

About a dozen social service organizations and synagogues can process the one-page applications, and Federation usually cuts a check within days.

Whether these grants, generous if limited, can help this new, desperate wave of people who have depleted all their other options remains to be seen. The grants were not intended for the chronically impoverished but to help people with a one-time boost.

Tracey (only her first name is being used to protect her privacy), a single mother of three, says the $1,800 grant she received kept her from becoming homeless when her private fitness business plunged in August 2009.

“I was a month behind on my rent, my landlord was threatening eviction, and my cupboards were almost bare. Having to tell my children we didn’t have enough money for food was really frightening,” she said.

Her rabbi at Kehillat Israel in Pacific Palisades told her about the grant.

“What it did for me was it bought me the month that I was behind on the rent, and it bought me time to get back on my feet and catch my breath,” she said. “And it also touched me on a different level. It really was my community taking care of me.”

The Jewish Community Foundation gave $250,000 to the cash grant program when it was launched and this week announced it was awarding another $250,000 to the fund. On top of that, the Foundation created and funded the Jewish Family Relief Network in May 2009. That program has divided $750,000 among front-line social service organizations — JVS, Jewish Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Los Angeles, Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles (JFS), Jewish Free Loan Association and the BJE (formerly the Bureau of Jewish Education). The Foundation money was earmarked for new clients, and linked the agencies for easier cross-referrals and case management.

BJE said it split Jewish Family Relief Network’s $150,000 among 23 days schools for the 2009-2010 school year, helping 50 students stay in their schools. Miriam Prum Hess, director of day school operations at BJE, said recipients included board members, PTA chairs and families who were once donors to the school.

But the grant didn’t cover the 2010-2011 academic year, and Prum Hess says schools are still struggling to keep families on board.

A challenging fundraising environment and government cuts are stretching social service programs even as new and more desperate clients continue to arrive and the needs of existing clients mushroom.

“The first wave was food, shelter, basics,” said Paul Castro, CEO of JFS. “The second wave is people starting to appreciate how their lives have changed. They may have lost their home, lost their job, and for many of them the stress on the family has really escalated. We’re seeing families who can’t afford to get divorced, so they are staying together, but the pressure within the family unit is at a much higher level than it’s ever been. Some of the things we’re seeing are greater substance abuse and more domestic violence.”

California’s recent budget negotiations spared JFS’ domestic violence programming and kept intact the budget for a program that keeps seniors in their own homes. But many of the wraparound services that seniors rely on have been curtailed.

As job competition favors younger people, investment revenues fall, government programs are cut, and families who had been supporting aging parents can’t even pay their own bills, JFS has seen a 22 percent increase in the number of seniors accessing its services, from nutrition programs to counseling services to case management, according to Nancy Volpert, JFS director of public policy.

JFS’ SOVA Community Food and Resource Program is at an all-time high, supplying a week’s worth of groceries to 10,708 people in August 2010, compared to 9,173 people in August 2009.

Dr. Randy Schaffer never thought he would end up at SOVA. Schaffer worked as an oral surgeon for 18 years in New Orleans but landed with his sister in Chicago after Hurricane Katrina wiped out his business, his savings and his home.

With the help of Jewish agencies there, he got a job as a salesman and then moved up in the company. Another company sent him to open an office in Los Angeles in August 2008, but within months the company eliminated his job. He couldn’t afford the apartment he and his 13-year-old son were living in and certainly couldn’t help his two older daughters in college.

He met with a JVS career counselor who aids SOVA clients on site. She helped him apply for an Emergency Cash Grant, which allowed him to move into a more affordable apartment. With the help of JVS, he decided to earn a master’s degree in education and started teaching, but within a year he fell victim to LAUSD’s last hired/first fired policy. Once again, with guidance from JVS, he decided to pursue a master’s in nursing, and his goal is to become a nurse educator when he graduates in 2012.

Synagogues are also seeing the effects of unemployment. Temple Kehillat Israel (KI) and Sinai Temple last year co-sponsored a job fair. Around 500 job seekers circulated among 50 employers with openings for everything from manual labor to a high-level position at Paramount Pictures.

Matt Davidson, program director at KI who helped organize the fair, doesn’t have an exact count, but he said multiple dozens of people found jobs through the fair last year, and he has high hopes for this year’s fair, Nov. 10 at the Olympic Collection. Around 100 employers are expected, and the fair is also being sponsored by Temple Beth Am, Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills and Congregation Kol Ami, in partnership with Federation, JVS, JFS,  Los Angeles Jewish Chamber of Commerce and the Board of Rabbis of Southern California.

Castro at JFS says even with the laudable response from the Jewish community, the social service network is continually getting more fragile.

“The reality is that, as time has gone on, there are fewer and fewer places for these people to go,” Castro said. “So what we’re fearful of is that more people will become chronically impoverished. And there is not the same safety net there was four or five years ago to address this.”

Lingering downturn brings new challenges for relief agencies, clients Read More »

Q&A with Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez

John A. Pérez, speaker of the California Assembly, represents downtown Los Angeles and several communities east and south of the city center. Pérez spoke to The Journal in his office, beneath a large photograph of the Breed Street Shul in Boyle Heights, the neighborhood where his mother grew up. 

Having just emerged from a long battle in Sacramento over the state budget, Pérez (D-46th District) addressed education spending, jobs, health care and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s vetoes of nearly $1 billion in social services.

Jewish Journal: Could you give a description of the 100 days of budget negotiations? What was it like?

John A. Pérez: I don’t discuss what happens in negotiations. When you’re in a confidential discussion, you protect that confidentiality, which is very frustrating for me, because I wanted to have a more transparent process than we ultimately had.

That said, it was still the most transparent process we’ve had in a long time. We had over 100 hearings in the capital. We did regional forums throughout the state. In the budget negotiations, there was a lot of wrestling back and forth over what the values should be. I’m satisfied that in the end the product was true to the values we set out.

JJ: The budget includes about $8 billion in promises of federal money and loans. Do you think that’s a long-term solution?

JP: It’s taken years to get us into this [budget] problem. And then we had a cataclysmic combination of events, a global economic meltdown. So we tried to create solutions that dealt with the immediate [problem], that made sure we had opportunities to grow and that did structural changes [like] creating a rainy-day fund and more controls over what we do with cash when we actually have it. 

Did we solve all the world’s problems in one year? Absolutely not. That’s pretty hard to do when you have to have a two-thirds majority to pass the budget.

JJ: What’s your take on education funding in California going forward? Can we afford to keep spending what we need to spend?

JP: I’m not one who usually quotes bumper stickers, but there’s one that I think captures it pretty well. It says, ‘If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.’ We can’t afford not to fully fund education.

We proposed spending a higher amount [$54 billion] on education than was ultimately agreed to. When you look at the future of the state, we’re going to need a well-educated, well-trained workforce. And you don’t get there by cutting education.

JJ: And yet, in situations like this, we had to suspend Proposition 98’s mandatory spending on education?

JP: You have to make the most responsible decisions you can with the resources you have. Our K-12 education funding this year is actually $300 million above what it was last year. Similarly, at the higher education level, there’s about a net increase of $600 million to CSU [California State University] and UC [University of California]. 

JJ: Could you talk a little bit about the reforms to state employee pensions? 

JP: In 1999, the legislature passed an increase in the percentage of wages that would go toward [state employee] pensions and decreased the age at which you could qualify for a maximum pension. 

What we did this year is rescind that for new state employees. That significantly decreases the general fund pressure but still protects the ability of state workers to have a pension that takes care of them into old age.

JJ: In talking with Republicans in California, public pensions are a real hot-button issue.

JP: This is one of the greatest examples of their hypocrisy, because they talk about it, but they don’t seem to vote for it. 

JJ: Nobody wants to be seen as cutting benefits to cops and public safety workers. 

JP: Well, [this reform] didn’t cut any benefits to cops. The Republicans didn’t vote for it because they were in love with doing the bidding of the prison guard union instead of saying that all state workers ought to be viewed the same way.

JJ: On the governor’s budget vetoes, were you surprised at the programs that were affected?

JP: Surprised would be an understatement. Offended would be more accurate. They were counter to what we were negotiating to protect, and, quite frankly, they made us lose ground. 

You’ve got these horrific attacks on mental health care services for children, you’ve got attacks on child welfare programs, you’ve got wholesale attacks on AIDS assistance programs, Alzheimer’s programs. This was not a pruning process. This was a gutting process.

This governor, through his line-item vetoes, may be the first person ever to create a ‘work-to-welfare’ program that will result in people no longer being able to afford the childcare that makes it possible for them to work. That’s counterproductive.

JJ: You were talking about jobs even before the budget negotiations began.

JP: And we were able to protect 400,000 of the 430,000 jobs that were in jeopardy under the governor’s proposal. His elimination of childcare may have an impact on another 50,000, so unilaterally he may cost us that many jobs.

JJ: Many of those 400,000 jobs are tied to government spending. But what can the government do to encourage private sector employment?

JP: First of all, two-thirds of the economy in the state of California is consumer based. So if you own a store, you aren’t asking people when they walk in the door, ‘Are you a government employee or a private sector employee?’ before you decide to sell them goods. 

We [also] passed a green manufacturing tax credit earlier this year that has created tens of thousands of jobs already in the few months that it’s been in place. The other thing is that I had proposed $1 billion of private-sector economic stimulus money. It got negotiated away in the budget. I was able to protect $30 million of small-business investment. 

JJ: What would the budget process this year have been like if Proposition 25 had been in effect [allowing budgets to pass by simple majority]? Would Republicans have been at the table?

JP: Everybody wants to be relevant. Republicans would still want to engage in a conversation. What you would take away, though, is the position where they can basically hold the budget process hostage. We would have had a budget in June. 

JJ: Finally, AB 1602, which you authored, is the first law by a state to enact the ‘exchanges’ that were part of the new health care federal law.

JP: And we’re very proud that California is the first state to do that.

JJ: What about fears that businesspeople may have about certifying a health plan on the exchange? What’s the process going to be like? Is it going to be open and clear and efficient?

JP: We [already] have several processes by which health plans are evaluated in California. You’re going to see this work very similarly to those. They’ve not been onerous. They’ve not in any way limited competition. They set the framework for different plans so that individual consumers, small businesses and large purchasers all have the same tools to understand what options they have.

JJ: From a consumer’s point of view, is it going to be clear? 

JP: The expectation is that it will be very easy for consumers to understand.

JJ: And what’s your opinion on possibly in the future seeing the state go beyond the federal minimum requirements and doing something like a public option in the state or going further?

JP: We’ve got a lot of work to do to get to what’s federally there. Let us get that implemented and then let’s evaluate its efficacy.

Q&A with Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez Read More »

Seeking a moral, meaningful life

A lively and literate voice has joined the ongoing debate over the existence of God, a timeless conversation that has been conducted in public in recent years by intellectuals ranging from Christopher Hitchens to Rabbi David Wolpe. “Spiritual Envy: An Agnostic’s Quest” by Michael Krasny (New World Library: $22.95) is remarkable for its clarity and candor in describing the author’s journey as a “self-identifying Jew” from the unquestioning religious belief of childhood to the challenging stance of an agnostic.

Krasny, an English professor at San Francisco State University and the author of “Off Mike: A Memoir of Talk Radio and Literary Life,” brings a unique body of knowledge and experience to the undertaking. He is the long-time host of “Forum,” a public radio program that originates at KQED-FM in San Francisco and features the kind of thoughtful and probing interviews that are a rarity in American media nowadays. Indeed, “Forum” is something of a pilgrimage site for those touring authors who are willing to put themselves and their books to the acid test of Krasny’s intelligence.

“I could not call myself a man of faith,” he confesses in “Spiritual Envy,” “but if ideology-smitten atheists could write of faith, why not a skeptic who envied those who, without being coercive or intolerant, were fortunate enough to have it?”

The title of Krasny’s book suggests the curiosity and yearning that have driven him on what can only be described as a lifelong quest.  He admires the comforting certainties of the true believer, and yet his intellectual honesty demands something more: “Agnosticism welcomes proof, craves it, demands it,” he explains.

“Spiritual Envy” is an intimate confessional memoir. “With a skullcap on my head and cantorial training from the cantor’s youth club,” Krasny recalls, “I led services and chanted Hebrew prayers like a kid smitten, which I was, with Elvis — in the pulpit I tried to sound like a rock-and-roll cantor.” By the time he reached college, however, he was thinking more deeply about matters of faith: “Could I depend more on what my intellect told me or what my heart longed for?” he mused. “Was it possible to have it both ways — to doubt God and simultaneously believe he existed?”

Krasny is one agnostic who fully appreciates the beauties of religion. “I longed for mystery, for ritual with meaning, for grace, for a soul I could believe in and for a God I could love and feel loved by,” he writes.  He studied kabbalah, contemplated the spiritual ecstasies that are promised by various faiths, experienced “evanescent moments of peace” at Big Sur and, above all, “read and read and read,”  everything from the Bible to William Blake to Bertrand Russell to Isaac Bashevis Singer. Because he was unable to “substantiate God’s existence,” however, Krasny turned instead and by necessity to agnosticism, which “became my creed.”

“I feel from time to time as if I have a soul, or something resembling what I conceptualize as a soul, and it feels as if it requires some form of spiritual nourishment,” he writes. “Then my intellect intercedes and dismisses such notions as fantasy or as what imagination or emotion or myth brings forth without even a scintilla of proof.”

What makes “Spiritual Envy” so compelling is Krasny’s ability to extract theological meaning from the raw material of politics and pop culture.  That’s why, for example, he is troubled by the fact that “The Silence of the Lambs” — a movie about serial killers — won five Academy Awards. “If God’s concern about murder necessitated the sixth commandment,” he asks, “What are we to make of the remorseless and psychopathic killings in the world or, for that matter, the spate of fictional killings that Americans seem to feast on that have made murder a kind of meme?”

Indeed, the overarching theme of “Spiritual Envy” is the obligation to define and achieve a moral life without reference to the prescriptions of organized religion. “Can agnostics engage in the nobler service of others, without a spiritual platform and without the drive to do good deeds that is often part of a spiritual philosophy or predicated on a spiritual doctrine or on a commandment to love?” asks Krasny. His answer: “Of course.”

At the core of Krasny’s spirituality is a certain kind of courage — the courage to accept the fact that we must make our way through the world without the certitude that religion asks its adherents to embrace. “We are ultimately unknowable to ourselves and others,” he concludes. “Our past and future are mostly unknowable. God is unknowable.” Krasny earns our admiration and respect precisely because he holds himself to the highest aspirations of doing good, even though, as he puts it, he finds “no visual evidence of a soul in ‘Grey’s Anatomy.’ ”

Jonathan Kirsch, author and publishing attorney, is the book editor of The Jewish Journal. He can be reached at books@jewishjournal.com.

Seeking a moral, meaningful life Read More »