fbpx

October 4, 2010

All-sports talk radio debuts in Israel

Israel’s first all-sports talk radio went on the air.

Israel Sports Radio, which launched Monday afternoon, will feature predominately English-language broadcasts with eight hours of continuous original programming five days a week.

Among the subjects to be covered are American football, hiking, soccer, basketball, baseball, rugby, cricket and fitness, as well as coverage of sports in America. Professional and amateur sports will be covered.

Israel Sports Radio is the brainchild of Ari Louis and Andy Gershman, the former co-hosts of American Sports Talk on Rusty Mike Radio, an Israeli Internet broadcast in English, and Josh Halickman, founder of the sports blog “The Sports Rabbi.”

Since its soft launch in July, the site already has attracted 6,000 unique visitors from 25 countries. It is expected to appeal mainly to Anglos in Israel and English speakers around the world, all with some kind of sports connection to Israel.

“We are eliminating yet another excuse for people not to make aliyah,” Louis said. “Our motto is simple: Building Love of Israel, One Sports Fan at a Time!”

The station has interviewed Omri Casspi, the first Israeli to play in the NBA, and his Sacramento Kings’  teammate Jason Thompson; Israeli soccer star Tamir Cohen; American-born Israeli basketball player David Blu (Bluthenthal); women’s pro basketball star Shay Doron; Orthodox Jewish boxer Dmitriy Salita; and three-time Israeli national figure skating champion Tamar Katz. The interviews may be found exclusively on the station’s website.

All-sports talk radio debuts in Israel Read More »

‘Glee’s’ Jewish character ‘Jew-Fro’: Offensive, but not anti-Semitic

The second season of Glee, Fox’s high-school-musical-for-grown-ups, has chosen to spotlight its fourth Jewish character.  His name is Jacob Ben-Israel (Josh Sussman) though he is affectionately called “Jew-Fro” in reference to his cotton-candy wad of – you guessed it – Jew-Fro. Like the show’s other Jewish characters, Ben-Israel is also unlikable – only more so.

He is, by my account, a blithering fool. But I was somewhat disturbed to read this post from The Daily Beast’s Jace Lacob, who takes him far more seriously:

The handling of the character—here presented as a sweaty, stammering, and compulsively masturbating Jew—borders on the anti-Semitic. Is it a case of Kosher panic? Or another symbol of that eternal Glee crutch: the use of stereotype as shorthand for character development? Either way, the butt sweat stains, over-the-top hairstyle (“It’s like a Jewish cloud,” cooed Brittany), self-pleasuring during the pep rally performance, and his attempt to actually buy Rachel from Finn are in shockingly poor taste, considering the series’ self-professed messages about acceptance and equality.

So, I agree, the Pee-Wee Herman antics? Not so hot. But “anti-Semitic”? That seems like a strong reaction to a character that is, at best, a caricature. “Jew-Fro” is not like any Jewish guy I know, which makes it hard to see him as any meaningful representation of Jewish whatsoever (even his fro, all messy and combed-through, is more Afro than Jew-Fro which usually come in the form of tighter curls and can be quite beautiful).  Ben-Israel is offensive because he’s callow and obnoxious – not because he’s Jewish.

It also makes little sense to me why Lacob’s analysis of the show, entitled “Why I Loathe Glee” (his italics, not mine) concludes that the show is silly and plotless (albeit true) but still insists it live up to its earlier incarnation as a smart show about “acceptance and equality”. (I’m not sure if Lacob is Jewish, but since the only mutual friend we share on Facebook is my rabbi’s spouse, I’m going to venture a good guess that his JewFro is personally offended by Glee’s JewFro.)

Even as Lacob rightly points out that “plot, characterization, and logic” have gone “out the window” on Glee – its audience holds: 13.3 million viewers for the Britney Spears episode last week. Because despite being plotless, Glee is not boring; it is trendy and zeitgeisty, taking the backdrop of high school and adding MTV.

“Scenes involving dialogue or plot development are shoehorned between massive musical set pieces, which draw from the vast and varied world of popular music,” Lacob writes of the show. “Instead of illustrating the unspoken and inner desires or fears of the characters, the songs here seem like coldly calculated viral videos, designed to rapidly spread across the Internet.”

Glee’s inventiveness as tabloid-style television for a generation that wants splashy entertainment fast is the antidote to more sophisticated shows like “Mad Men” (which similarly, does not depend as much on plot as it does on deep, rich characterizations, and the significance of events and historic parallels that require careful observance, patience and reflection). Glee is more like sex without love; a hot, quick fix that doesn’t amount to much and doesn’t need to.

Which is why it makes even less sense that critics are decrying the show for being plotless and popular—as if what’s popular is always a pre-requisite for taste. I say, let’s come back to this in a couple years—I’m willing to bet the Glee legacy will be exactly where it ought to be.

[CORRECTION APPENDED]

‘Glee’s’ Jewish character ‘Jew-Fro’: Offensive, but not anti-Semitic Read More »

South African museum to juxtapose Holocaust with Rwandan genocide

At a South African Holocaust museum that plans to open late next year in Johannesburg, the Holocaust will be featured beside a more local genocide: the Rwandan violence of 1994.

The inclusion of the African mass murder is not a mere gesture toward political correctness in what will be the third Holocaust museum in Africa. Rather it will be an integral part of the planned Johannesburg Holocaust and Genocide Centre.

“The Rwandan section is a prominent part of the permanent exhibition, not an afterthought,” said center director Tali Nates. “It will be a shared museum.”

The message the juxtaposition sends is stark: that the Holocaust, and remembrance of it, did not prevent another genocide from occurring. Even in Africa it’s not a message that naturally occurs to the Jews here, Nates said.

“I don’t think that as South Africans and as Jewish South Africans we actually made the connection,” Nates said. “You cannot look at the story without remembering that as a South African, you need to make the connection to Rwanda, to the continent of Africa and to the fact that genocide, sadly, did not stop after the Holocaust.

“So I could not, in 2010-11, establish a Holocaust exhibition within South Africa without looking at Africa,” she said.

The museum will combine survivors’ testimonies with documents, photographs, film, interactive exhibits, text and artifacts. The exhibition space will take visitors on a route starting with exhibits on racism in general to the South African experience during apartheid to survivor accounts. There will be a memorial courtyard, an exhibition on the Rwandan genocide and an area dedicated to issues facing South Africans today, such as xenophobia.

To include South African voices in the exhibition on the Holocaust, seven local Holocaust survivors and Pretoria resident Jaap van Proosdij, who saved dozens of Jews, have been interviewed.

For the Rwanda section, the center is collaborating with museums and nongovernmental organizations in Rwanda, Britain and the United States. The exhibit will tell the story not only of the killings, which took the lives of some 800,000 people, but little-known stories of those who rescued Tutsis from the violence.

The museum is receiving significant help from Proof, a U.S.-based organization that interviews rescuers in former hot spots such as Rwanda, Bosnia and Cambodia.

Describing the Rwandan exhibit, Nates said, “It will be a sizable exhibit with moving images, with color, and we will use a lot of the voices of the victims, perpetrators, bystanders and rescuers.”

As the Holocaust exhibit covers the 12-year period from 1933 to 1945, compared to the less detailed 100 days of the Rwandan genocide, the Nazi exhibit will be larger.

“It’s not a competition in size of story, it’s not a competition in suffering,” Nates said. “It is about the human connection between the ‘Never again’ that we said after the Holocaust and the ‘Again and again’ that sadly we experienced in the 20th century.”

The Rwandan story resonates particularly in South Africa, which emerged from decades of apartheid just as the Rwandan genocide took place. Indeed, South Africa’s experience with apartheid will form a substantial part of the introduction to the Rwandan exhibition.

South Africa is the only country in Africa where the teaching of the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide are part of the national curriculum. The center is committed to assisting this education and has been doing so since its establishment in temporary premises in 2008.

Like the country’s two other Holocaust centers, in Cape Town and Durban, the Johannesburg Holocaust and Genocide Centre plans to bring in scholars and train educators.

“Our hope is that our education efforts will lead to growing awareness, intervention and prevention” of xenophobia within South Africa, Nates said.

Architect Lewis Levin is designing the museum. African stone, readily available in the Gauteng province in which the museum will be located, will be incorporated with concrete and steel.

The visual effect will evoke not only wreckage and destruction but also trees in a forest. Levin says the imagery is deliberate.

“If you visit the death camps, the fragments of mangled steel that have remained and of forests surrounding the precincts are strong visual associations,” he said.

The split-level, 9,000 square-foot center will be comprised of two buildings connected by a bridging structure and public areas. The first floor will house the permanent exhibition, while the second floor will include administration offices, a temporary exhibition space, a lecture hall and a resource center.

At street level, the double-volume foyer will be dominated by a wall of clear glazing interspersed with illustrations drawn by children in the Theresienstadt ghetto during the Holocaust. There will be an area for reflection inside and outside in the form of the memorial garden to victims of the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide.

In the displays, the museum will include explanations in South Africa’s indigenous languages, such as Zulu and Xhosa, in addition to Hebrew and English. At the entrance will be a memorial light with “Z’chor,” the Hebrew word for “remember,” alongside words for remembrance in other African languages, including Kinyarwanda, the language spoken in Rwanda.

The Johannesburg center is being funded by the Jewish community, and the South African Holocaust Foundation will determine the educational and philosophical direction of the center, as it does for the country’s two other Holocaust centers. The new center is also partnering with the city of Johannesburg to place the museum in a prominent site in the heart of the city—on Jan Smuts Avenue, one of the city’s main thoroughfares, near other museums and its main universities.

The property, which will be leased to the museum at minimal cost, originally belonged to the Bernberg sisters, Jewish sisters who had a fashion museum there and bequeathed the site to the city on condition that it be used as a museum or art gallery.

Nates, a native of Israel who married a South African and has lived here for 25 years, is an internationally regarded scholar on the Holocaust and a child of survivors. Her father and uncle were on Schindler’s list; much of the rest of her family was murdered at the Belzec death camp.

South African museum to juxtapose Holocaust with Rwandan genocide Read More »

Netanyahu trying to convince top ministers to extend settlement freeze

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will convene his forum of top ministers on Tuesday afternoon to debate extending Israel’s moratorium on construction in West Bank settlements for 60 days.

The concession would be made in exchange for a series of reported U.S. guarantees in Israel’s direct peace negotiations with the Palestinians. Israel halted construction temporarily for 10 months, a freeze that ended on September 26.

The Palestinians have said they would not continue the recently renewed negotiations unless Israel agreed to halt construction again. The Obama administration has urged Israel to reconsider its refusal of that demand.

If Netanyahu succeeds in convincing the Forum of Seven to accept an extension of the construction freeze, he plans to bring the matter to the political-security cabinet for a vote later Tuesday.

Read more at HAARETZ.com.

Netanyahu trying to convince top ministers to extend settlement freeze Read More »

Mairead Maguire deportation appeal denied

Israel’s Supreme Court rejected an appeal by an Irish Nobel laureate who was refused entry to Israel because of her involvement in a Gaza-bound flotilla.

The high court made its ruling Monday evening on Mairead Maguire, who was detained last week at Ben Gurion Airport and threatened with deportation.

Maguire, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1976 for her efforts to fight the sectarian violence in her native Northern Ireland, was banned from entering Israel for 10 years following her participation in a Gaza-bound aid flotilla last June. At the time she signed a document agreeing not to enter Israel again without a special permit, Haaretz reported.

The three Supreme Court justices, including President Dorit Beinisch, found that Maguire arrived in Israel despite knowing that she had been banned from entering the country. She told the court that she was not aware of the ban.

Maguire had arrived in Israel last week to meet a group of women touring Israel and Palestinian areas to learn about the work of female peace activists. She has been held in an Israeli detention center ever since as the court heard her appeals to be allowed to enter the country.

The state rejected a proposal by Benisch that would have allowed Maguire to remain in Israel until Wednesday in order to keep her scheduled meeting with the group of peace activists.

During Monday’s hearing, Maguire called on Israel to stop practicing “apartheid” against the Palestinians, which led one of the justices to tell her that the court “is no place for propaganda.”

Mairead Maguire deportation appeal denied Read More »

Op-Ed: Counting American Jewry

In a translation that makes the complex seem simple, Anglo Jews call the fourth book of the Torah “Numbers.” Although counting and numbers play a role in the biblical account of our people’s story, the Hebrew name of this book—B’midbar, or ”in the wilderness”—is a more apt descriptor of our physical and spiritual wandering in the desert.

Nevertheless, the English translation captures what has become an obsession, carried through to the modern era, in counting our numbers.

Over the past several decades, the American Jewish community has invested more funds in sociodemographic studies of the Jewish population than it has in any other form of systematic social research. In recent decades, major national studies of the size and characteristics of the American Jewish community have been conducted in parallel with the 1990 and 2000 U.S. censuses. It also has become common for local Jewish federations to sponsor decennial studies of their populations.

Although I have benefited from communal support to conduct some of these studies, I am a reluctant contributor to this knowledge base. Knowing the number of Jews in the United States and in local communities is far less interesting and important than understanding their character. Unfortunately, conducting demographic research has drained attention and resources from the task of better understanding the dynamics of communal engagement and the effectiveness of our efforts to engage and educate new generations.

Key to my pessimism with our counting obsession is that we have not been able to conduct very good studies. Modern demographic studies often are treated as if they are censuses that yield actual counts. But they are surveys of a “rare” population and are strongly affected by coverage and nonresponse errors that can provide misleading results. “Who is a Jew?” questions notwithstanding, it’s extremely difficult to locate Jews and to estimate accurately their numbers.

When the Israelites were wandering in the desert, b’midbar, their number was counted initially to assess military strength. The contemporary American version is to count our numbers so that we know how to plan for communal needs. But planning requires an understanding of who the people are and what they need. It requires the ability to look “backward” at how Jewish identity and engagement have evolved and, at the same time, the capacity to look forward and predict the future.

Even if we could overcome challenges to locating a representative sample and develop accurate “point estimates” of the number of Americans who claim Jewish identity, our data would be insufficient.

What, then, would be useful and what is feasible in terms of resources and methodology?

One approach is to synthesize existing data from dozens of surveys that ask questions about religious and ethnic identity. This approach enables us to have accurate data at a relatively low cost and, equally important, to track population changes over time. But the demographic data does not shed much light about the Jewishness of the population or the impact of changes in communal structure.

To understand those issues, we are conducting additional studies with representative, albeit imperfect samples, that allow us to track longitudinally how Jewish identity and behavior change.

What is essential about any research is that it enables comparison. In the case of population numbers, assessing trends—the growth or decline of the community—is more important than the actual numbers. It is the comparison of population estimates over time, not the numbers themselves, that are most significant.

Similarly, being able to compare those who engage with the community and those who don’t—and identifying the causal factors—is the basis for policy analysis. A new generation of studies is needed.

New ways of doing and understanding research on American Jewry will provide not only a number-based account of the community’s evolution, but also the analytic base for understanding how we are acculturating and preserving Jewish tradition. It will assess our strength in spiritual and intellectual prowess as well as our numeric strength. This research will provide tools to understand how we relate with one another, and how we relate with Jews in Israel and around the world.

Parashah B’midbar describes God’s instruction to Moshe, “Se’u et rosh kol adat bnai Yisrael”—“Take a census of the whole Israelite community.” The instruction is not simply “Moshe, tell me how many people you have … give me a number.” It is far more profound. Literally, the text translates as “Lift up the head of the Israelite community.”

The biblical injunction should be the byline of social scientists who aid the community in their research. We need to uplift the community with knowledge and, in so doing, contribute to a vibrant future.

Leonard Saxe is the Klutznick Professor of Contemporary Jewish Studies, chair of the Hornstein Jewish Professional Leadership Program, and director of the Steinhardt Social Research Institute and the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies at Brandeis University. Reprinted from Sh’ma: A Journal of Jewish Responsibility (http://www.shma.com http://www.shmadigital.com) October 2010, as part of a larger conversation about the ways Jews Count.

Op-Ed: Counting American Jewry Read More »

Vatican paper slams Berlusconi over ‘Jewish joke’

The official Vatican newspaper slammed Italy’s prime minister for a joke that played on Jewish stereotypes and made fun of the Holocaust.

Silvio Berlusconi told “offensive” and “deplorable” jokes, the Vatican newspaper L’Osservatore Romano said in an editorial published Sunday

Berlusconi was filmed telling the “Jewish joke” to well-wishers Oct. 2; the video clip was posted online by the anti-Berlusconi newspaper La Repubblica.

In the clip the prime minister recounts how a Jew charged another Jew about $4,000 a day for hiding him during World War II. The punchline of the joke states, “The Jew says, the question now is whether we should tell him Hitler is dead and the war is over.”

Berlusconi has been filmed or quoted in recent years making a number of other jokes that include content seen as sexist or offensive.

In its editorial the L’Osservatore Romano said, “The head of the government’s jokes appear more deplorable” and “offend indiscriminately the feeling of the faithful and the sacred memory of the six million victims” of the Holocaust.

Vatican paper slams Berlusconi over ‘Jewish joke’ Read More »

Galloway says he’ll sue Canada over Hamas label

Former British lawmaker George Galloway has vowed to sue the Canadian government over invasion of privacy.

Speaking Sunday at a Toronto church to several hundred supporters, Galloway claimed his privacy was violated last year after he was banned by Canada’s pro-Israel government because officials in Ottawa alerted British newspapers in March 2009 that he would be denied entry because he supports the terrorist Palestinian organization Hamas.

Canada’s Federal Court ruled last week that the approach was improper.

Branding Galloway a Hamas supporter because he once delivered an aid convoy and cash to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip was unfairly motivated by “antipathy to his political views,” the court said, and showed “a flawed and overreaching interpretation of the standards under Canadian law for labeling someone as engaging in terrorism or being a member of a terrorist organization.”

The court said Ottawa acted against Galloway despite a recommendation from Canada’s spy agency that he did not constitute a threat.

Following a lengthy interview by immigration officials over the weekend, Galloway was permitted to enter Canada.

At the Toronto church, Galloway repeated his oft-aired views that Jerusalem is being “ethnically cleansed” of Christian Arabs and Muslims, and that Palestinians see their former homes being “enjoyed by foreigners.”

Canada, he said, is now seen as “no more than an embassy for [Israeli Prime Minister] Benjamin Netanyahu,” and “a trumpet for the most extreme Israeli politicians.”

Galloway also called for a one-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian problem.

Another harsh critic of Israel, Norman Finkelstein, is planning several cross-country speaking engagements in Canada later this month.

Galloway says he’ll sue Canada over Hamas label Read More »

Irving Kessler, former UIA vice chairman, dies at 88

Irving Kessler, a longtime lay leader of the Jewish federation system and its overseas partners, has died.

Kessler,  the executive vice chairman emeritus of the United Israel Appeal, died Saturday. He was 88 and lived in Newport, R.I.

Kessler served the UIA from 1974 to 1988 before becoming the senior adviser to the chairman of the Jewish Agency for Israel.

Prior to his work at the UIA, he was the executive director of the Jewish Federation of Greater Hartford, Conn., after serving as a staff member there, according to the UIA.

Kessler helped secure U.S. government funding to help immigrants settle in Israel, as well as a line of credit from the government in 1984 to help Israel begin Operation Moses, which brought thousands of Ethiopian Jews to the Jewish state.

He was a World War II veteran of the Army Air Corps.

Irving Kessler, former UIA vice chairman, dies at 88 Read More »

D.C. liberals’ rally features rabbi, diplomat, shofar

A Washington rally of liberal groups included a rabbi, a top Jewish diplomat and a shofar blower in its religious portion.

The One Nation rally organized by unions, environmental groups, gay rights groups and an array of other liberal organizations, drew tens of thousands Saturday to the National Mall.

Rabbi Arthur Waskow of Philadelphia’s Shalom Center delivered a sermon, as did a Muslim and a Protestant cleric.

Waskow quoted from the Rev. Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech in 1963. In the speech, King referred to the biblical prophet Amos, saying that “We will not be satisfied until ‘justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.’ “

Waskow listed areas in which he said Americans were “still not satisfied,” including poverty, the environment, the influence of corporations, civil rights, health insurance and wars overseas.

Hannah Rosenthal, the U.S. State Department envoy combating anti-Semitism, was among a number of speakers to read from sacred texts.

A local man, Victor Granatstein, began and ended the religious portion by blowing a shofar.

The rally was organized in part as a counter to a conservatives’ Tea Party rally held in August and headlined by talk show host Glenn Beck.

Authorities do not estimate crowds, but photos suggested that the conservatives’ rally dwarfed its liberal counterpart. That rally included Rabbi Daniel Lapin, a founder of Toward Tradition, a group that argues that conservative values are underpinned by Jewish and Christian beliefs.

D.C. liberals’ rally features rabbi, diplomat, shofar Read More »