fbpx

July 19, 2010

Taking Judaism Seriously Again

Jonathan Zasloff’s article “WhatAre You Doing for Asarah B’Av?” might have come as a shock to somereaders of the Jewish Journal. Opening with the provocative summonsto have a Jewish hoedown on the 10th of Av (a day, not incidentally,when our Temple continued burning, for which reason certain halachicrestrictions remain in force on the morning of the 10th ofAv), Zasloff writes: “The time has come for us to acknowledge thedirty little secret of Tisha B’Av: The destruction of the Temple wasone of the best things ever to happen to the Jewish people.”

He adds: “Had the Temple actually survived,it would have meant the destruction of the Jewish religion. Our religiousand spiritual practices would have centered not on Torah, but ratheron bloody sacrifices,” when Judaism was a cultic worship propagatedby a “priestly cult,” making Tisha B’Av “not a tragedy but moreakin to our people’s bar mitzvah.”

There is nothing in these sentimentsthat should surprise anyone; they reflect the well worn beliefs of progressiveJudaism and its outlook on the Torah, i.e. the idea that the Torah isa fraud that is not what it purports to be. For roughly 200 years therehave been just two mutually exclusive perspectives regarding the Torah.(1) The Torah was written by Moses; or (2) the Torah was originallywritten by multiple authors who never met each other, who contradictedeach other, who even hated each other, and who invented their storiesfor political purposes.

The first perspective is generally acceptedby Orthodox Jews and the second perspective is believed by academicsin universities throughout the Western world and liberal Jewish rabbiswho teach or are taught that the Bible is an amalgamation of contradictorysources and myth, jam-packed with ancient and outdated practices.

So which of these competing views iscorrect? The answer to this question matters a great deal to religiousand secular Jews, and to anyone who loves truth. If the Bible had multipleauthors, there is no reason for anyone to take it seriously since, ata minimum, multiple authorship would establish that the Torah is untruthfulabout its own claim that Moses led the Israelites out of Egypt, ledthem to Mount Sinai where they heard the Ten Commandments, and thenwrote the entire Torah over a 40-year period.

And if the Torah is not the book thatMoses wrote (by Divine dictation), but rather a book that Hebrew politicians— or members of a priestly cult — wrote to feather their ancientnests, why should you or I live by its onerous demands? Let Zasloffand his friends chant Rambam in Arabic (as he proposes) to the tuneof Kumbayah. We (who are Orthodox Jews) will take off our kippot anddrive to the beach on Shabbat, or catch a movie, or something otherthan sit in shul all day and learn difficult texts in a foreign language— if Judaism is nothing but a bunch of made up fairy tales

The destruction of the Temple was a greatnational tragedy. The great leaders and Torah sages of the time institutedobservances that would help us focus on the underlying reasons for thedestruction — the baseless hatred, the failure of our peopleto love our fellow Jews as ourselves (news flash to Zasloff: our religion was based on Torah, not “bloody sacrifices,” as his own citationof Rabbi Akiva’s scholarship makes abundantly clear). Zasloff wouldbe closer to the mark if he said only that we can derive good from thistragedy by learning these lessons and uniting according to Torah preceptsand values.

The biggest barrier to doing so todayis the fact that many, if not most, Jewish religious leaders no longerbelieve in the Torah’s authenticity. If progressive Jews, followingthe academic view of the multiple authorship of the Torah, are correct,then the Torah is fictitious, unreliable and unworthy of the demandsit makes of us. Caught in the crossfire are synagogue members and collegestudents who trust in their leaders (clergy or professors) a littletoo much, fearing to delve into esoteric concepts and make up theirown minds.

Contemporary American Jews owe it tothemselves to investigate whether or not the Torah is a fraud, and toask their religious leaders their answer to this question. Then theycan decide for themselves whether they want to gyrate to the Kaddishd’Rabbanan with Jonathan Zasloff, or take Judaism seriously.

Eyal Rav-Noy, director of the JewishLearning Academy, an outreach center in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood,and journalist Gil Weinreich are authors of the new book Who ReallyWrote the Bible: and Why It Should be Taken Seriously Again. Theycan be reached at www.WhoReallyWroteTheBible.com.

Taking Judaism Seriously Again Read More »

Religious Intolerance in Israel

It is pretty hard to write about the topic of “senseless hatred,”  known in Hebrew as “sinat chinam,” when I am so angry!  Anger is a healthy part of our emotional structure, allowing us to release tension, express feelings and emote in a way that our mind and body truly need.  In life, if we are honest with ourselves, there will be people, actions and situations that make us angry, perhaps furious, and we all need constructive outlets with which to deal with them in a meaningful way.  Suppressing anger, or pretending that you are never angry, is unhealthy and renders us prisoner to our unexpressed feelings and emotions.  It is from this place, from this depth, before the lowest, saddest day in the Jewish calendar, Tisha B’av, the 9th of the Hebrew month of Av, that I come to share some thoughts on the events of this week in Israel, events that, sadly, are all too common these days, and that have nothing to do with the conflict with the Palestinians or the wider Arab world.  No, these events involve just us, the Jewish people, as we continue to struggle with how to live in a religious structure that doesn’t honor, validate or appreciate the varieties of practice and holy expression that our people has been blessed with achieving.

To begin with, the conversion bill, sponsored by MK Rotem of Yisrael Betainu, which we had been worried about and acted on a month or so ago, and which we had thought was going to be shelved, was suddenly introduced, and astonishingly passed a first reading of a Knesset committee 5-4.  The bill needs to pass three readings of the full Knesset before it is law, which seems highly unlikely, but this is very worrisome.  The bill, like any bill in a government, has many moving parts, but the big one is that it places conversion to Judaism in Israel directly into the hands of the Israeli Rabbinate, which is Orthodox and getting increasingly more ultra and extreme by the minute, as well as calling into question whether or not non-Orthodox conversions outside of Israel, which until now had been recognized for purposes of making aliyah, moving to Israel, will continue to be accepted.  This bill, sponsored by a fairly secular, but ultra-nationalist party, will not only drive a larger wedge between the secular and religious citizens of Israel, but will further alienate Diaspora Jews from connection with Israel.  This at a time, as we have seen with articles like those of Peter Beinart and others, when Diaspora Jews, and non-Orthodox American Jews in particular, are already feeling disconnected and uninterested in Israel.  The experiment of rebirthing a Jewish homeland, a dream of our people since the Temple was destroyed in 70 CE, is facing a huge challenge, not only from the outside forces that seek its annihilation, but from the very poison that our ancient rabbis taught us caused the destruction in the first place: sinat chinam, or baseless, senseless hatred.

It is a painful and uncomfortable subject to talk about, this intra-Jewish hatred, disrespect and alienation, but the fact that the Israeli government has given over Judaism and ritual life in the State of Israel to the charedim and ultra-Orthodox, as well as electing a government with a strong majority party like Yisrael Beiteinu, which is ultra-nationalistic, represents a serious threat to relations with us in the Diaspora.  This is Israel, the land where all Jews, and others, but certainly all Jews, are supposed to feel welcome, embraced, part of the family that makes up the fabric of our Jewish existence.  This is Israel, where the greatest of our values, ancient and modern, are meant to be lived out; embracing the stranger, the widow and orphan, being responsible for all members of our Jewish family, social justice, tikkun olam, holiness and ecstatic love for God, Torah and the Jewish people.  And sadly, in 2010, we are facing an increasingly hostile, rigid and fearful group of fundamentalist Jews that is gaining more and more control over religious life in Israel.  Now, with this bill, they are seeking to narrow the gap even further, and the Jewish people is facing a crisis.  Who will define what “Judaism” is and what is acceptable?  Who will define which of us are considered members of the people and which are not?  Who will define what ritual practices, what legal interpretation, and what level of acceptance of modernity, will represent the “true” Judaism?  To be clear, there is no “true” Judaism, and I am not calling on the charedim or ultra-Orthodox to abandon their practices and join my synagogue, or any Conservative synagogue in Israel.  My cousins in those strands of our Jewish family are welcome to keep practicing their own brand of Judaism, and while I may feel sad that we can’t ever interact and learn from one another because of their fear, I don’t disparage them or feel “senseless hatred, sinat chinam” towards them.  I am only asking that our brand of Judaism, and all brands of modern, progressive, egalitarian Judaism, be allowed to live and flourish in the land.  This is not happening, and I resent that, and feel called to speak out against the intolerance, and senseless hatred that I have both experienced in my life directly in Jerusalem, and what I know to be happening today.  How we navigate through this period in Jewish history, as the Talmud reminds in discussing the destruction of the 2nd Temple, has mainly to do with how we treat one another and find ways to build more bridges to understanding.  And if that is not possible with the charedim, which it just may not be, then they need to have the power wrested from them and allow Israel to become a religiously pluralistic society, which will include providing space for them to practice their Judaism how they wish.  They cannot, however, impose their Judaism on the entire State of Israel, on the entire Jewish people.  It is here that we must learn the lesson of history if we are to successfully emerge from this dark time.

And, if this conversion bill, which was brought to the Knesset committee as a sneak attack, wasn’t enough, another disgraceful and deeply painful event transpired as well.  Many of you probably know about the group Women at the Wall, a grassroots organization that has been operating since 1988 trying to bring egalitarianism and equality to the prayer areas of the Kotel, the Western Wall.  As it stands now, the Kotel is an official religious site, therefore it comes under the auspices of the Israeli government, which we know is controlled by the Orthodox rabbinate.  The prayer areas of the wall are separated by a mechitza, a barrier, with men and women on opposite sides, as is the custom of an Orthodox synagogue.  While that is bothersome to me, as I can never have a moment of connection at this holy spot with my wife or daughter, it is actually the rules of the women’s area that have caused the greatest turmoil.  Last winter, Nofrat Frenkel, a leader in this movement, was arrested by the police for publicly wearing a tallit, a prayer shawl, and just this past Monday, on Rosh Chodesh, the new moon, when the group historically meets for public prayer, Anat Hoffman, another well-known leader, was arrested for carrying a Torah, which technically is allowed, although women are not permitted to read the Torah at the Wall, even in their section.  The video of her arrest has gone viral on the internet, and I am proud to say that my own rabbinic intern, Susan Goldberg, who is in Israel studying this summer, was at the service and is quite visible in the video.  Even after the group had left the Kotel area and were heading to Robinson’s Arch, an approved side section of the larger area, the police continued to harass Ms. Hoffman, with one officer in particular getting quite agitated and angry, and eventually they got her into a police car, with the Torah, after failing to wrestle the Torah from her arms.

Regardless of what we think about the different ways to practice Judaism, and as I said, I am supportive of allowing all denominations and stripes of Jews practice how they want, how can we tolerate and live with Israeli police arresting a woman for holding a Torah?  Why should the Jewish people, which has a long and proud history of being pluralistic and religiously tolerant, be subjected to this treatment because of a small minority of extremist charedim think it is a desecration of God, for a woman to read from the Torah and participate fully in religious life?  I am not asking them to accept what we do, just as I don’t accept what they do.  But, and here is where the argument always breaks down for me, I am excepted to respect them and their wishes and needs because they are “religious,” but they are not expected to reciprocate.  There is a classic rabbinic notion that in a case where we have an option to be lenient or strict in an interpretation of a law, often times we bend to the stricture for the sake of honoring those for whom the leniency would offend.  Basic example of this is that if requested, a prayer service should not be egalitarian in order to satisfy a more religious person’s needs because technically men and women can participate in a non-egalitarian service, even though women don’t count, but a more religious man cannot participate fully in an egalitarian service.  So what if we are disrespecting the women, and men for that matter, who don’t like it, at least we are being fair and open to the more religious.  And on and on.  Bottom line for me is this, at least in regard to Israel: as long as the government continues to surrender the religious life of the country to the Orthodox rabbinate, this problem is only going to get worse, and it will only serve to further alienate Israelis (80% of whom want absolutely nothing to do with anything religious) and will deepen the gap, which is continually growing, between Israel and the majority of American Jews, who are non-Orthodox.  Ignoring the problem, or saying that there is no problem, are not options any longer.

Final word for tonight: The level of sinat chinam, senseless hatred and lashon ha’rah, speaking ill of others, that exists now between the ultra-Orthodox and the rest of the Jewish world is reaching levels that are unsustainable.  I would call on the reasonable, conscientious and fair-minded Modern Orthodox rabbis, of whom there are many and with whom I have good relations, to make attempts to reach out to our brothers and sisters in the more extreme wings of our people.  And while they too are probably not considered kosher in the minds of the charedim, they are closer than I am!  We need new leadership to bring us back from the edge of the abyss.  We stand on the cusp of Tisha B’av, a day of mourning and deep reflection about not only who our outside enemies are, which are real and present today, but also what the internal danger is that we face as a people.  A comment on the part of the Talmud that speaks of the destruction of the Temples from the Chafetz Chayyim, a great 20th century rabbi and creator of the Musar Movement, dedicated to values and ethics, is how I will close.  He says that “a single congregation that is meticulous in maintaining peace amongst itself can merit bringing the Messiah.  Thus, the coming of the Messiah is in our hands.  It is well known that true peace is impossible without passionate pursuit of eradicating senseless hatred and evil speech.” The situation in Israel today, with the religious intolerance and the increasingly domination of the charedim and ultra-Orthodox, threatens to derail the hopes for a peaceful future almost as much as the conflict with the Arabs.  May we remember the lessons of the past as we reflect on the sadness in our communal history this coming Tisha B’av, and then rise up to work tirelessly to guarantee that we don’t repeat those same mistakes.  It is in our hands.

Religious Intolerance in Israel Read More »

Cheaper Internet: Next Stop, ‘Palestine’ [VIDEO INCLUDED]

[Jerusalem] Internet is about to get cheaper for Palestinians. 

VIDEO:  http://media.themedialine.org/media/snyder.wmv

Within weeks, the Palestinian Authority will be taking action which is expected to end the virtual monopoly held by the Palestinian Telecommunication Group PalTel over Internet services in its territory. 

Palestinian Authority Minister of Telecom and Information Mashhour Abu Daka told The Media Line he will be issuing certificates shortly for telecommunications companies wishing to provide Internet services to the Palestinian market. 

“I hope to finish the qualification of companies that will be able to offer such services next week,” Minister Abu Daka told The Media Line. “This will create competition, so we expect Internet prices to come down within a few weeks time.”

The Palestinian Telecommunication Group owns almost all telephone and Internet services infrastructure in the West Bank and Gaza. The company includes PalTel, which owns the land line telephone infrastructure; Hadara, the only Internet services provider; and Jawwal, the leading cellular company.

While the Palestinian Authority has a 7 percent stake in the PalTel Group through the Palestine Investment Fund, the company is publicly traded and a giant in the Palestinian economy. It makes up 50 percent of the worth of the Palestine Securities Exchange and 29 percent of the Palestinian Authority’s gross national product (GDP).

The ministry’s initiative will require PalTel to provide ‘Bitstream service’, allowing new Palestinian Internet service providers (ISPs) to use the PalTel broadband Internet infrastructure for an as yet undetermined fee. Such companies would then be able to offer Internet services to the Palestinian market at a speed and quality defined by PalTel.

“Basically the idea is to have a mechanism to allow other service providers to use the PalTel infrastructure for a fee and to provide the service to their customers,” Ahmed El-Farra, the CEO of PalInvest, a Palestinian trade group which promotes free trade told The Media Line. “They are still working out what the fee will be but they haven’t agreed with the ministry.”

“The problem in telecommunications is how you get to the end user and PalTel owns the infrastructure in the West Bank and the Gaza,” El-Farra said. “[PalTel’s Internet services provider] Hadara is basically monopolizing the entire Internet structure. This is part of liberalizing the market but it’s more complicated than it seems. It’s not just a plan; it’s the implementation on the ground which will put it to the test.”

The ministry’s initiative is based on a model very similar to Israel’s Internet market, which has a number of Internet service providers competing with one another under a ‘Bitstream’ scheme in which they share access to two Internet infrastructures.

“Things have been very restrictive to just PalTel,” the minister said. “We are just moving in the same direction as Israel. Now the market will be open to other companies.”

A number of sources told The Media Line that the PalTel Group is planning to downsize so as to better compete under the new scheme for open competition in the Palestinian Internet services market. The PalTel Group is also believe to be planning to dissolve Hadara, the group’s Internet subsidiary and currently the only Internet service provider in the West Bank and Gaza, or to make it a separate company.

Tareq Maayah, CEO of Exalt Technologies, a Palestinian software development company, argued the ministry’s initiative falls far short of introducing competition into the Palestinian Internet services market.

“The ministry is falling short of the ultimate goal,” he told The Media Line. “Basically the ‘Bitstream’ scheme just requires PalTel to sell the rights to use their fixed lines to other Internet providers. This means that the competition is still under PalTel’s control and the quality of the Internet line is still controlled by PalTel.”

“It’s an issue of quality of service and pricing,” Maayah said. “We’d like to see much more competition. It would have been better quality, more reliable Internet at a higher speed at a much cheaper cost.”

But El-Farra, head of the trade group, argued that the PalTel group was simply protecting its interests like any other business would do.

“I don’t think they are directly resisting it, they are trying to go along with whatever the ministry is asking for so that they can keep their position as the market leaders,” he said. “They are being creative in how they are responding, for example by developing a ‘Bitstream’ model which would keep them as the market leaders.”

“The reality is that PalTel has this power and they want to exercise it and make money one way or another,” El-Farra continued. “As business managers they are trying to deal with regulatory changes in a way which keeps them in the lead. I don’t blame them for that.”

TRANSCRIPT:

JAMES SNYDER

Director,The Israel Museum

Your browser may not support display of this image.

In conversationwith

FELICE FRIEDSON

Presidentand CEO of The Media Line News Agency

When legendary Jerusalem MayorTeddy Kollek inaugurated the Israel museum in 1965, his vision was thatthe Jewish State offer a world class repository of art and archaeologyprominently featuring its culture. In 1997, the Israel Museum acceleratedits climb toward becoming a world class institution when James Snyder,then the deputy director of Manhattan’s Museum of Modern Art, wasgiven the reigns. Innovative exhibits from all over the world beganappearing in the museum bolstering the Israel Museum’s own exhibitsand unique collections, while Israel’s own treasures began to visitthe world’s premier museums.

Snyder is about to re-launchthe Israel Museum following a three-year, $100 million facelift andreconstruction program.

The Media Line’s FeliceFriedson discussed the Museum’s re-launch and the vision behindit with James Snyder as final preparations for the gala were underway.

TML:  So,James, which came first: The $100 million vision or the$100 million budget?

Snyder:  Well,I’ll tell you something: the first time I came to see the campus ofthe museum was when I was asked to become director. I knew the museumbecause of its world reputation. In a very short period of time—31years—the museum had become one of the strongest encyclopaedic museumsworldwide and with a very strong and active program in modern and contemporaryart, which are my own fields. When I came to Jerusalem and I steppedon the campus, I was just astonished at the beauty of the place andthe way that art and archaeology and landscape and architecture synthesizedto create a place that said, “this is about culture”; was somethingthat I felt was really special. Oddly, I had a vision that day to takethe museum from the potential it clearly had to a higher level thatwould really be about showing how here, perhaps more than any othermuseum setting anywhere else in the world, you could make a statementabout universality and material culture, starting from the beginningof time and coming to the present. And in a way, the project that weare completing now is the realizing of what that first spontaneous visionis about.

TML: What does$100 million get you?

Snyder: That’s alsoa good question. We are at the tail end of an age where museum expansionsor museum redevelopments or new museum development projects have costmany multiples of that number and in a way, we set out to demonstratethat you can make a complete and transforming change to the public faceof the museum and only spend $100 million. In our case, whatthis will do is allow us to double our collection galleries from 100,000square feet to 200,000 square feet and then add approximately100,000 square feet of new construction devoted to entry, visitor servicesand movement through the campus.

TML:  Whenyou arrived on the scene in 1997, I suspect you knew that much of whatyou inherited had to go at some point. What was your tipping point andwhen did your vision become a work in progress? What were the prioritiesin creating that new plan?

Snyder:  It’svery amazing. Teddy was a visionary. On the other hand, Teddy was nota long-range planner. Teddy actually pulled together all the piecesof the museum in a kind of serendipitous way and it worked. The maincampus designed by Russian-born, German-trained Bauhaus-trained émigréto Palestine, Al Mansfeld; combined with the Shrine of the Book, designedby Frederick Kiesler, an Austrian émigré to the U.S.; and the BillyRose Art Garden, designed by Isamu Noguchi, a Japanese émigré to theWest Coast of the U.S. Three different kinds of modernism all informedby sources in different parts of the world, all brought together onthis campus in 1965. So for us, it wasn’t about throwing anythingaway. It was about realizing the amazing quality of the original bonesof the original architectural heritage of the place and building onthat legacy. So in fact, our project is much about we call a “renewal.”We call it that because the project isn’t about taking everythingdown and starting from scratch. It’s really about building upon thevision of the bones of the original.

TML: How did yourwish list take shape?

Snyder:  I wouldsay in a kind of organic way. We didn’t do this immediately. I arrivedin 1997 and we spent five or six years—we really passed the museum’s40th anniversary pushing the pre-existing campus to its limits.At that point, we saw what the real strengths of the campus were; whatthe real quality of its original architecture was all about. It’snot that there was a “wish list” per se. There was just an ideato redress the campus, to reorder the way you move through the beautyof the pre-existing place. So that you could bring out the strengthof character of that place and reorder its interior so that you couldreally experience the unfolding of material culture from the start oftime until today.

TML: Give me avisual example.

Syder:  Well, it’san amazing thing. Jerusalem is a unique city in that it’s built fromits own bedrock, as we all know. So the Israel Museum, clad in Jerusalemstone but built of glass, steel and other materials, sits on a hilltopthat is Jerusalem stone and we actually excavated 1,000,0000 cubic feetof Jerusalem stone so as to order the plan and reengineer the plan withinthe original and preexisting envelope of the campus. The changes, ina way, that we made are surgical. When we are all finished, you willsee and feel the aura of the essence of the original modernist ideaof this place as a modernist that is modern backdrop for showing thehistory of material culture from the start of time to the present moment.It’s a curious thing. It’s a thrilling thing. Now, as you arrivehere, we have formalized the entry. We have made a more clear path fromthe front of the campus to the heart of the campus. But now, unlikebefore, you will stand at the heart of the museum and you will be ableto turn around 360 degrees and you will see the entrances to our collectionsfor archaeology; Jewish art and life; the Western fine art traditions;the non-Western fine art traditions; our main auditorium; and our maintemporary exhibitions galleries—all in a main 360 degree turn fromthe heart of the museum, from a place we now call the Cardo.

TML: How manyvisitors enter the museum on an annual basis?

Snyder:  It’sfascinating. Prior to the start of the second intifada, our attendancewas moving up toward 1 million visitors a year. The second intifadachanged that dramatically and we fell to about 300,000 visitors a year.Now, I would hasten to add that a city with 700,000 residents in a countrywith 6 or 6.5 million residents, that’s not a small number of visitors.And yet, post-intifada, our attendance was primarily local andon the order of 300,000 to 400,000 a year. In the last two years, duringwhich 90 percent of the campus has been under reconstruction, we’veactually had an average of 500,000 visitors a year, which is remarkable.

TML:  Canyou break down the demographics of where these people are coming fromfor the most part?

Snyder:  I wouldsay 50 percent are local and we have a very, very loyal local audiencefrom Jerusalem and its surrounding environs; and 50 percent is worldwide.

TML: Israeli-Jewand Israeli-Arab?

Snyder: Absolutely. The museumis really about intercultural resonance and inter-communal engagementand our audience reflects that. Our audience is really a mirror of that,not just in our local attendance where it is as much as about everycommunity that lives and works around Jerusalem, but we see it in ourinternational traffic. It’s great.

TML: What do youanticipate in terms of traffic with this new renovation?

Snyder:  We’llsee. We are not about politics but our attendance is, of course, influencedby how the country sits in the eyes and minds of the rest of the world.So if we are in a calm, international environment, our attendance shouldcontinue to grow dramatically the way that tourism in Israel has continuedto grow in the past few years.

TML:  Youhelped personally to grow MOMA, the Museum of Modern Art, and you hada vision: a $60 million campaign to help enhance what they built there.How has that experience helped you in this current experience, thisthree-year $100 million renovation?

Snyder:  It’sfunny—that experience is now almost a quarter of a century ago butwhat it did teach me was the importance of creating cultural placesof strength, of soul and of spirit. When you build a cultural place,it’s not just about making a building. And in a funny way, our projectisn’t about making a building. Our project is about strengtheningthe power of the character of this place and making sure it radiatesa message of culture. I did learn that at MOMA. MOMA is really the fountainheadof modernism in my own field—my academic field is modernism—andreally even here, where of course we are dealing with cultures thatare ancient and are part of a continuum that begins in prehistory, beforeancient times and comes to the present. But it’s still about modernism.It’s about our own moment in time. When I was at MOMA, my focus wasat beginning at the origins of modernism and looking ahead, and nowwhat I realize is that if you take modern and contemporary moments,they really sit on the crust of a long history of material culture,which is what this place is all about.

TML:  James,it wasn’t long after you arrived in the nineties that the Israel museumwas clearly expanding its horizons so that the art, archaeology andculture of the region was supplemented by exhibits on loan from othermuseums. How were those selections made?

Snyder:  When you’rean encyclopedic museum, the world is your oyster in a way because youcan think about how works of art from different cultures and from differentperiods of time and history can be juxtaposed in ways that are reallyresident or illuminating. I would say in years that we developedour exhibition program we were always in thinking about what we havehere and how that can be amplified, clarified or stimulated by bringingmaterial by other parts of the world. Then what happened here is quiteinteresting. Our collections comprise 500,000 things. The oldest objectis a million years old. We begin a million years ago. We come to thepresent moment with a very active program in collecting in contemporaryart. We collect the cultures of this region of the world, we collectthe cultures of all other regions of the world. We realized severalyears ago that more important than bringing loans from elsewhere wassurfacing the quality of the material we have ourselves. In the lastfive years, we have refocused our attention to making exhibitions—-major exhibitions—using our own material and then circulating thoseexhibitions worldwide. In the last two years while our reconstructionprogram has been ongoing, I think we circulated exhibitions to 19 venueson four continents worldwide from the Israel Museum.  It’s reallya great thing to look at my table:  I have a stack of exhibitionbooks from countries in South America, North America, Europe and Asia;in Portuguese, in Italian, in Danish, in Turkish. In this past year,which has been a challenging year in terms of politics and diplomaticrelations between Israel and Turkey, the Israel Museum presented anexhibition of Chagall from the Israel Museum collections at the PeraMuseum in Istanbul and it was a blockbuster.

TML: Do you thinkyou could do that today?

Snyder:  I suspectthat we could. This was just within the last six months. And to haveon my table a book on Chagall from the Israel Museum in Turkish is areally thrilling thing. Our exhibition was Chagall from the Israel Museumfor the first time in Turkey. Chagall was not a familiar artist to Turkishaudiences.

TML: The one-million-year-oldoldest artifact that is housed at the Israel Museum: what is it?

Snyder:  It’sa funny thing. Of course, archaeology here is almost entirely aboutthe indigenous archaeology of the ancient land of Israel. We have somematerial from other parts of the world, or that came from the marketplace,but most of what we have is documented to the source of excavation. The oldest thing we have, which is a million years old, is a set ofelephant bones, and the evidence of the implements that were used tohunt and dismember an elephant. It’s not so much archaeology as itis anthropology but it is an indication of the hand of man touchingmaterial culture. And then you jump to 325,000 years ago and we havein the collection a small basalt pebble-like fertility goddess thatwas carved with the flint that was considered not by us, but by theacademic world as the oldest object sculpted by the hand of man. Andthen you jump to 20,000 years ago, when the collections here reallybegin with the first objects that demonstrate the notion of existentialreflection and material culture. Beautiful river stones with faces carvedin them. From that point on, from 20,000 years ago to through the Ottomanempire, it’s a continuum of material culture reflecting man’s thinkingabout himself and about life and later about polytheism, about monotheism,about Judaism and then formative Christianity and Islam, and finallyto the flowering of Ottoman culture from this part of the world to theEast and the West.

TML: What newadditions are to be unveiled?

Snyder:  Many.I can’t even begin to enumerate the amazing new things you’ll seethere.

TML: Give me anexample of what the public is going to see.

Snyder: We’ve doubledand reinstalled all of the collection galleries of the museum. In greatpart, this is really about surfacing the strength of what we alreadyhave but we also have amazing new highlights. In archaeology for example,you’ll see from the Crusader Period, a very rare fresco from the tombof St. Mary in Gethsemane.  And you’ll see a magnificent, 17 th- century Ottoman period Mihrab, prayer niche from Isfahan. In JewishArt and Life, we will be displaying for the first time some of our greattreasures of illuminated manuscripts including the magnificent late15th– century copy of the Mishneh Torah of Maimonides (Rambam)that was written and illuminated in Northern Italy. As you know, wehave had in our collection, in Jewish Art and Life, synagogue interiorsfrom three synagogues: two in Europe and one in Asia. One from Italy,one from Germany and one from Cochin in Southern India. We’ve nowadded a fourth, which is from one of the earliest synagogue communitiesin South America in Paramaribo in Suriname, a magnificent early 18th-centurycomplete synagogue interior in Suriname. So now our synagogue collectionscover Europe, Asia and the Americas. It’s remarkable and unique. Inthe fine arts, we have works of art that we are adding in all categories.In contemporary art, which as I’ve said, is kind the crust of thislong timeline of material culture, we’re opening our galleries withan exhibition called “Still Moving,” which in a way is on the subjectof slow movement in contemporary art, but of course, it’s also a playon words because it’s about continuing to move ahead and the factthat we are still moving. That exhibition includes nearly 30 recentacquisitions in contemporary art which will be highlights of the exhibition,again, sitting on the crust of material culture.

TML: Glad youbrought that up—looking ahead, kids come from schools from all overthe country to visit the Israel Museum. Is there anything innovativethat you have envisioned specifically for children? 

Snyder:  For children,we are of course developing programs, guidelines and ways for them toexperience and put their arms around the notion of the history of materialculture, all in one site and setting. I have a little bit of a dreamthat children will start to come here once a week and every week for52 weeks of the year; that they’ll tackle a different moment alongthat timeline. So that over the course of the year, they can start atthe beginning and end today.  And year after year, they can comeback and cut that sequence of experiences in many different ways andover time really come to have a sense of the roundness of world culture.

TML: The IsraelMuseum has almost an equal number of volunteers as the number of thosewho are employed by the museum. To what do you attribute this number?

Snyder:  I’dsay several things. First, I’d say that our 350 volunteers are treasuresof our collections, the way that our collections are treasures of thecollections.  A lot of people retire to Jerusalem from all overthe world and they have time and energy and it’s really great andwe’re a magnet for them. And they do everything. They are our faceto our public. They work at the information desk. They work as guides.They work in the offices and it’s really a great resource.

TML:  Howmany workers did you employ during the three-year reconstruction periodand where did they come from?

Snyder:  Well,we kept our own staff very busy publishing books, making exhibitionsand designing and installing the new galleries. The construction project,probably at its peak, employed about 400 workers who came from a totalof seven countries. It was really amazing. We feel that we sit at thecenter of the universe here so when you do a project like this and yourconstruction teams come from all over the world, it’s really a greatreflection of what our essence is about.

TML:  AndI’d be remiss if I didn’t ask about the funders. Where are theyfrom and how do you raise $100 million?

Snyder:  The museumis really supported by the world and we have an international councilwhich is just a remarkable enterprise worldwide. We have organizationsformally in 14 countries and we have friends all over the globe. Everythingthat happens here happens because of what all of those friends feelabout the museum and about the extent to which they believe in the museumand are committed to what we do. Our campus project is funded in aninteresting way. Again, we didn’t build a building. We renewed a campus.We decided to make it a collective initiative and I think 21 friendsand family and foundations from all over the world contributed giftsof $5 million and $10 million to make possible this transformative changeof this place.

TML:  Withyour three-year renovation complete, what does James Snyder have athis command which he didn’t have between 1997 and 2010?

Snyder:  We don’tthink in those terms. We always think that we have the resource thatis the great potential of this place. Perhaps with this project we havetaken ourselves one step closer to realizing the potential of this place.We hope we have given it a bit more clarity, made it a bit more beautifulbut really what this place is about is all of that richness. If we saton a landscape of beauty and cultural concentration and cultural intensity,hopefully we are sitting on that landscape with the sense all the moreso of the power of that place.

TML:  Whenyou think of all of the great art institutions of the world, The MetropolitanMuseum; MOMA; the Louvre; the Prado—where does the Israel Museumtake its place and how do you compare it to the museums of the MiddleEast?

Snyder:  I’mnot sure I’m the one to answer that question but I must say there’ssomething quite special about being an encyclopaedic museum that isbeing a universal museum that sits on a hilltop surrounded by the majestyof Jerusalem.  It really does make us stand apart from all of thoseother great museums by virtue of universalism that we have and by virtueof the location of where we sit at the heart of the universe.

TML:  Isthere any encounter over the current years that you have been at thehelm of the Israel Museum in the political arena that has been problematic?

Snyder:  I thinkwe really demonstrate the point that culture is exactly not about politics.We are fortunate in that respect but really what I want to say is thatwe are really not about politics. Our 20 acres are the state ofthe Israel Museum and it’s just remarkable in how the worldrespects that and that what we do is really about the message of interculturalconnection, inter-communal connection and universal connection and it’sreally what makes us great and what makes us special.

TML: What do youdo in your spare time, James?

Snyder: I run the IsraelMuseum and it’s a pleasure and a privilege.

Cheaper Internet: Next Stop, ‘Palestine’ [VIDEO INCLUDED] Read More »

The burqa ban: a legal perspective

 

Last week, I discussed France’s burqa ban. Today, law professors discuss it:

John Yoo: My bet if that the law were written in the way that the French have done it, it might have a chance. As I understand it, the French law does not mention or ban burqas specifically. It prohibits people from wearing masks in public, with certain exceptions for costumes (this being France, where people wander the streets of Paris eating eclairs and dressed up as characters in Dangerous Liasions, I suppose). If a law like that were passed in the US, it would be neutral toward religion on its face, as opposed to a law—like one that banned animal sacrifices, but with an exception for killing animals to eat them—that obviously targeted religion (that too, was another Supreme Court case).

Richard Epstein: Ban the Burqa? Should that be a cause or a concern? The issue is indeed, tough, as Peter Robinson says. And Reynolds v. United States is the worst place to start in thinking about it. Reynolds had to address the extent to which a government ban on polygamy could be imposed consistent with the view that Congress could make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion. The presumption is thereby set in favor of religious liberty. The question is what can overcome it. Killing third persons is easy, because that prohibition is part of the standard definitions of freedom, which cover only those actions that do not threatened the lives and property of others. Change that rule and the religious autocrat puts us all in the position of kill or be killed. But polygamy threatens no such risk. Within the libertarian calculus the most obvious source of harm is the offense that others take of the practice, and that type of harm rates very low on the scale of public justifications to intervene because it allows worked-up majorities to gain their way by their common sense of indignation. So we want something more…

To see the rest of Epstein and Yoo’s comments at Ricochet, hide the member comments so only the contributors’ show up. More from Martha Nussbaum at the Opinionator blog.

(Hat tip: Above the Law)

The burqa ban: a legal perspective Read More »

What was so great about the holy temple?

I didn’t have any classes with Jonathan Zasloff this past year, though I may in the fall. Regardless, I got a quick education on the destruction of the Second Temple, and why Zasloff thinks it was good for the Jews, in his cover story for this week’s Jewish Journal.

He writes:

We mourn the Temple’s destruction on Tisha B’Av, but had the Temple actually survived, it would have meant the destruction of the Jewish religion.  Our religious and spriritual practices would have centered not on Torah, but rather on bloody sacrifices of bulls, lambs, and goats on the Temple altar.  Can anyone seriously argue that such practices represent the way of uplifting the soul and approaching God?

Perhaps more importantly, survival of the Temple would have deprived us of the extraordinary achievement of rabbinic Judaism—a religion vastly superior to the Priestly cult that preceded it.

Judah Ha-Nasi only decided to compile the Mishnah when it became clear that the Temple would never be rebuilt.  So had the Temple survived, there would have been no Mishnah.  No great tradition of scholarship and learning.  No Pirkei Avot.  No Tosefta.  No Talmud.  No Rashi.  No Maimonides.  No Ramban.  Only a lot of dead, bleeding animals.

Rabbinic Judaism, and the texts, institutions, philosophies, and traditions accompanying it, constitute not only one of the greatest achievements in the history of human civilization, but also one of the greatest paths for connecting with God.  The triumph of the rabbis represented nothing less than the divine spirit entering the minds, hearts, and souls of the Jewish people.  In this light, mourning the Temple’s destruction is entirely misplaced: the event represents the Jewish people’s maturation into a closer, more adult relationship with the Holy One.  It is not a tragedy, but more akin to our people’s Bar Mitzvah.

What was so great about the holy temple? Read More »

Russian speakers to take in Jerusalem Limmud

Some 1,000 Russian-speaking Israelis are expected to attend the Limmud conference in Jerusalem.

The three-day program in Jerusalem, set to begin Wednesday, will feature events, workshops, panels, interviews, lectures, cultural presentations, seminars and round-table discussions on an array of topics presented in Russian or Hebrew with Russian translation. Prominent Israeli academics, journalists, public figures and politicians will serve as presenters.

This year’s theme centers on 26 Nobel Prize winners born in the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and in Israel.

A Salute to Russian Immigrants in Israel will be held to mark 20 years since the mass immigration of the late 1980s and 1990s.

Among those scheduled to attend are Natan Sharansky, chair of the Jewish Agency; Matthew Bronfman, the American businessman and philanthropist who is among Limmud FSU’s principal supporters; and several Israeli government ministers.

Russian speakers to take in Jerusalem Limmud Read More »

Kin of 9/11 victims join AMIA demonstration

Relatives of victims of the 9/11 World Trade Center attack joined in a demonstration to mark the 16th anniversary of a Buenos Aires Jewish center bombing.

A car bomb in 1994 blew up the AMIA center, killing 85 and wounding hundreds.

Local Jewish organizations and the families of the AMIA victims were joined at last Friday’s demonstration by the families of the victims of the 2004 Madrid train bombings, which allegedly were directed by al-Qaida, as well as Spanish Judge Baltasar Garzon, a member of the International Criminal Court at The Hague.

AMIA and DAIA, the central Jewish institutions in Buenos Aires, organized the demonstration with the Relatives and Friends of the AMIA Victims organization.

The bombing allegedly was carried out by Hezbollah agents with Iranian sponsorship and organization, but Argentina has not been able to bring anyone to justice for perpetrating the attack.

About 5,000 people attended the event, including Argentina’s vice president, Julio Cobos; its Cabinet chief, Alberto Fernandez; and Minister of Justice Julio Alpacas. Former President Nestor Kirchner also was on hand; his wife, current President Cristina Fernandez, was in China.

Garzon praised a letter sent by President Obama to President Fernandez congratulating Argentina on its fight against terrorism, and the judge urged the U.S. government “to provide a real support to demand the Iranian government’s answer” to the Argentinean request for extradition of the accused Iranian perpetrators.

“We accuse Iran of being behind the death of my brother, of your friends, of your neighbors; a country that denies the Holocaust, and even threatens to erase another country of the world with nuclear weapons, with the consent of Russia and Brazil; a country which shakes hands with Venezuela, which doesn’t show solidarity with our claim,” Marina Degtian, whose 21-year-old brother Cristian was killed in the AMIA blast, told the crowd.

Kin of 9/11 victims join AMIA demonstration Read More »

Israeli fencer takes European bronze

An Israeli fencer won the bronze medal at the European Fencing Championships.

Noam Mills, 24, lost in the semifinals to Germany’s Imke Duplitzer, who went on to win the gold medal in Sunday’s competition in Leipzig, Germany.

Mills, who competed in the 2008 Beijing Olympics, is a native of Kfar Saba. She is entering her junior year at Harvard University and was captain of the women’s fencing team there last year.

She finished seventh in last year’s European championships.

Israeli fencer takes European bronze Read More »

Israeli an ace at World Series of Poker event

A native Israeli won first place in an event at the World Series of Poker in Las Vegas.

Tomer Berda, who now lives in Menlo Park, Calif., where he owns a software research and development company, took the gold bracelet in the no-limit hold ‘em event. Berda defeated 197 others to take the $825,976 first prize.

Ynet reported that Berda was the first Israeli to win a World Series of Poker event.

According to the World Series of Poker website, Berda started playing poker in 2003, and enjoys playing online, but has started playing more live tournaments in the last year.

Berda previously had two final table appearances and four cash wins at the World Series.

Israeli an ace at World Series of Poker event Read More »

What’s New for the Kids to Read?

The newest books for Jewish children are unlikely to appear on school summer reading lists. Included here are some of the latest offerings for children that are characterized by positive Jewish themes and can easily be packed into that camp or vacation suitcase. For some of the consistently best Jewish children’s picture books, visit the website for Kar-Ben Publishing (www.karben.com) and load up on the lightweight paperback versions for your trip.

The most unique picture book storyline this season may be found in “Feivel’s Flying Horses” (Kar-Ben, $7.95), by Heidi Smith Hyde, with pictures by Johanna Van Der Sterre. It is a beautifully illustrated account of Feivel, an immigrant woodcarver who had to leave behind his wife and children in the old country to make his way to the good life in America. No longer able to make a living carving three-dimensional figures on Torah arks, he uses his woodcarving skills to carve fabulously ornate horses for the Coney Island carousel until he earns enough money to bring his family to join him. An author’s note describes the life of Marcus Charles Illions, an observant Jew from Lithuania (who used to carve his name in the bodies of his horses), and the lives of other well known Jewish wood carvers, who became nationally known for creating a new art form that delighted generations of children.

Daniel Pinkwater, NPR commentator and author of dozens of children’s books, has teamed up with his wife Jill for an irreverent picture book that ingeniously combines three languages (English, Spanish, and Yiddish) into an offbeat narrative of a “brave and clever” Yiddish chicken. In “Beautiful Yetta, the Yiddish Chicken”, (Feiwel & Friends, $16.99) Yetta escapes from her crate just as Mr. Flegleman, the organic chicken rancher, is unloading his chickens at Phil’s Poultry World in Brooklyn, “with a tear in his eye”. “Where am I? Vu bin ikh?”, she exclaims. She is a frightened outsider in a strange new place with no friends until she encounters a little green parrot named Eduardo who is about to be pounced upon by a sneaky cat. “Gay ahVEK, du fahrSHTUNkehneh kahtz!”, (“Go away, you stinky cat!”) she yells, and saves the day, to the delight of Eduardo’s Spanish speaking bird family. Part immigrant story, part language lesson, and consistently fun, the Pinkwaters’ newest tale reminds children that if you are confident in who you are and where you come from, friends will never be far away.

Older children who are fans of comics and graphic novels will be delighted to see that Steve Sheinken, the author of “The Adventures of Rabbi Harvey” series, has just come out with a third installment entitled “Rabbi Harvey vs. The Wisdom Kid” (Jewish Lights, $16.99).  Subtitled, “A Graphic Novel of Dueling Jewish Folktales in the Wild West”, this title continues the adventures of comic book hero Rabbi Harvey of Elk Spring, Colorado, who has to rely on his Talmudic knowledge and assorted Judaic teachings to overcome a variety of humorous villains, such as sweet-faced “Bad Bubbe” Bloom, and her interloper son, Rabbi Ruben, “The Wisdom Kid”. Clearly the town’s not big enough for two rabbis, and that includes the village of Helms Falls, whose inhabitants (think: fools of Chelm) are interviewing candidates for town sheriff. Sheinken includes an informative afterword explaining the folktale and Talmudic sources for each of the stories in the text along with a detailed bibliography for additional reading. The unusual flat, elongated drawings take a bit of getting used to for adults, but they are unlikely to bother kids who will enjoy Rabbi Harvey’s twist on midrashic logic and lore.

Popular young adult novelist Sarah Darer Littman, author of the excellent Sydney Taylor Award winner, “Confessions of a Closet Catholic,” has another sure winner in her latest offering, “Life, After”, (Scholastic, $17.99) in which she tackles myriad themes, including immigration, 9/11, depression and school bullying. Fifteen year-old Dani and her family escape a crumbling life in Argentina years after her beloved aunt was killed in the 1994 terrorist attack on the Jewish Community Center there. Life in a new country is difficult, especially while dealing with a different language, a depressed father, and an American high school environment where everyone is not particularly friendly. Plus, does she still have an Argentinean boyfriend, or has he moved on? Her life Before was so much simpler. Littman catches the voice of teen readers with her spot-on dialogue and realistic situations as her characters learn how to heal, forgive, and open their hearts as they celebrate their new lives, After.

For those seeking a bit of artistic creativity this summer, the wonderful craft and how-to book by Israeli artist Lorna Sakalovsky may fit the bill. Known for her whimsical ceramic figurines and intricate chess sets, “Grandma Lorna” has gathered up more than two dozen “activities”, as she calls them,  that have been joyously shared with her grandchildren throughout the years. Previously published in Israel, her book now shares her original ideas with anyone who loves playing games, drawing, cooking or enjoying creative tasks with children. “Grandma Lorna’s Hugs Hints and Happiness: For You and Your Grandchildren” (Lambda Publishers, $29.95), includes colorful, sturdy, photo-illustrated pages with instructions for making potato men, mouse masks, cucumber crocodiles, scrambled egg pictures, and more, plus games such as “Fresh Fruit Frenzy” or the “Dots and Squares Game”.  All activities look to be easy to do, even “spoon people theater,” made from plasticine (molded onto spoons) that can be purchased at craft stores. Grandma Lorna’s infectious enthusiasm is explained in the opening pages: “This is your precious time to bond with the grandchildren just loving each other. The grandchildren will remember these moments when they are themselves grandparents and recall the joy they felt being with you.”  This book is useful for any family, particularly scout and camp groups, not just grandparents, and certainly worth the investment.

Lisa Silverman is the director of the Sinai Temple Blumenthal Library in Los Angeles and the children’s editor of Jewish Book World magazine.

What’s New for the Kids to Read? Read More »