fbpx

January 27, 2010

Israel’s ‘Ajami’ In Running for Foreign-language Oscar

The Israeli film “Ajami” has made the first cut in the Oscar race by being named among nine semifinalists in the foreign-language film category.

The nine movies were selected from among 65 entries and will be winnowed down to five when all Oscar nominations are announced Feb. 2.

“Ajami” paints an unsparing picture of Arab-Jewish and intra-Arab tensions in a mixed quarter of Jaffa. Its co-directors are two young Israelis, Scandar Copti, a Christian Arab, and the Jewish Yaron Shani.

Also picked was Germany’s “The White Ribbon,” which has gotten the most buzz and won the Golden Globes for best foreign movie. The film by Michael Haneke is set in a rustic German village around 1914, whose seemingly placid life holds the seeds for the Nazi flowering to come.

Other semifinalists are: Argentina’s “El Secreto de Sus Ojos,” Australia’s “Samson and Delilah,” Bulgaria’s “The World Is Big and Salvation Lurks Around the Corner,” France’s “A Prophet,” Kazakhstan’s “Kelin” and the Netherlands’ “Winter in Wartime,” in which a Dutch boy aids a downed British pilot during World War II.

Israel’s ‘Ajami’ In Running for Foreign-language Oscar Read More »

40 YouTube Videos about Tu B’Shvat – Jewish Arbor Day

” title=”Watch the rest of the them here”>Watch the rest of the them here.

40 YouTube Videos about Tu B’Shvat – Jewish Arbor Day Read More »

Reid to bring Iran bill by mid-February

The U.S. Senate majority leader pledged to bring an Iran sanctions bill to the floor within weeks.

“This critical legislation would impose new sanctions on Iran’s refined petroleum sector and tighten existing U.S. sanctions,” Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Tuesday on the Senate floor, referring to the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2009. “The act will create new pressure on the Iranian regime and help stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.”

The congressional session ends Feb. 14.

The Foreign Relations Committee, headed by Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), is considering White House requests for changes in the bill as now drafted. It is unclear if the bill Reid would bring to the floor would include the expansive sanctions targeting Iran’s energy sector favored by some in the pro-Israel community.

Such sanctions are included in a similar bill passed last month by the U.S. House of Representatives.

A letter sent Wednesday by a bipartisan slate of nine senators urged President Obama to sign the bill once it is passed and to exercise existing sanctions available to him.

The letter, signed by Sens. Evan Bayh (D-Ind.), Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), John McCain (R-Ariz.), Robert Casey (D-Pa.), Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.), Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.), Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and David Vitter (R-La.), expressed support for multilateral sanctions, Obama’s preferred option, but also urged him not to delay in pursuing unilateral sanctions.

“We hope that, as early as this month, your administration will pursue parallel and complementary measures, outside the [U.N.] Security Council, to increase the pressure on the Iranian government,” it said. These include sanctions targeting third parties that deal with Iran.

Reid to bring Iran bill by mid-February Read More »

Orthodox woman to get title of ‘rabbah’

An Orthodox clergywoman will now be known as “rabbah” rather than an acronym that had been created on her behalf.

Sara Hurwitz, who has been performing rabbinical duties at the Hebrew Institute of Riverdale in New York City, last year had been given the title of Maharat—a Hebrew acronym that stands for a leader in legal, spiritual and Torah matters. 

But in a statement issued Wednesday, Rabbi Avi Weiss, spiritual leader of the Hebrew Institute and Hurwitz’s mentor, said the acronym had failed to take hold and that Hurwitz would henceforth be called “rabbah,” a feminized version of the title “rabbi.”

“This will make it clear to everyone that Sara Hurwitz is a full member of our rabbinic staff, a rabbi with the additional quality of a distinct woman’s voice,” said the statement issued by Weiss’ office.

Hurwitz, who has served at the Hebrew Institute for nearly seven years, has completed the same course of training and examination as male Orthodox rabbinical students. Her curriculum was modeled after that of the male students at the liberal rabbinical school Yeshivat Chovevei Torah in Riverdale, which Weiss founded and now leads.
Read Sara Hurwitz’s blog at JewishJournal.com.

Orthodox woman to get title of ‘rabbah’ Read More »

Obama: Duty to remember Nazi crimes [VIDEO]

Marking the 65th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, President Obama said the death camp invokes a “sacred duty” to remember Nazi crimes.

“We have a sacred duty to remember the twisted thinking that led here, how a great society of culture and science succumbed to the worst instincts of man and rationalized mass murder and one of the most barbaric acts in history,” Obama said in a video message to be delivered at International Holocaust Remembrance Day commemorations Wednesday. “We have a sacred duty to remember the cruelty that occurred here, as told in the simple objects that speak to us even now. The suitcases that still bear their names. The wooden clogs they wore. The round bowls from which they ate. Those brick buildings from which there was no escape, where so many Jews died with Sh’ma Israel on their lips.”

Leading the U.S. delegation to the commemoration is Julius Genachowski, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission and the child of survivors.

Others in the delegation include Lee Feinstein, the U.S. ambassador to Poland; Hannah Rosenthal, the special envoy to combat and monitor anti-Semitism; Susan Sher, First Lady Michelle Obama’s chief of staff and the liaison to the Jewish community; Roman Kent, the chairman of the American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and a survivor of Auschwitz; and Auschwitz survivors Charlene Schiff and Edwarda Sternberg-Powidzki.

Obama: Duty to remember Nazi crimes [VIDEO] Read More »

Netanyahu at Auschwitz: World must unite to confront new threats

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told dignitaries gathered at the Auschwitz extermination camp on Wednesday that the world must learn from the Holocaust to unite against new threats.

In what was apparently a thinly veiled reference to Iran, Netanyahu called on the international community to come together to confront “impending dangers”.

Israel believes Iran to be building a nuclear bomb and views the Islamic Republic as an existential threat. Iran insists its nuclear program is purely for civilian purposes.

Read the full story at HAARETZ.com.

Netanyahu at Auschwitz: World must unite to confront new threats Read More »

Hollywood Zion

In Philadelphia over winter vacation, I popped over to see the Philadelphia Museum of Art, one of the nation’s best. I got to stand alone before Picassos and Van Goghs. In fact, the only place I had to wait in a line of jostling, snap-happy tourists was to see — Rocky.

In the 1976 movie, the boxer, played by Sylvester Stallone, caps a grueling training montage by finally running all the way up the steps of the museum. He turns, faces his city and raises his hands in triumph. Stallone commissioned a statue to recreate the famous pose where it really fictionally happened, but the museum Brahmins relegated the thing to a little corner at the base of the steps. So that’s where the crowd gathered late on a freezing December afternoon: not inside to see Rodin, but outside, to see Rocky.

In a world lacking faith, coherence and community, movies are church, family and university. They are the first thing strangers can talk about, the last thing we all have in common. The British critic Alistair Cooke got it right many years ago when he called Hollywood, “the most flourishing factory of popular mythology since the Greeks.”

New England novelist John Updike got it, too. “It was one of history’s great love stories,” he wrote in his 1970 novel, “Bech: A Book,” “the mutually profitable romance which Hollywood and bohunk America conducted almost in the dark, a tapping of fervent messages through the wall of the San Gabriel Range.”

What’s interesting is how, many years since Updike wrote those lines, so few people still appreciate this simple fact.

The Catholic League, the Family Research Council, the self-appointed guardians of morality, decency and sound bites still spent 2009 attacking one of the few bright lights in a dark year.

“You are going to see anti-hunting, anti-Second Amendment circuses from Hollywood,” former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin said last July in her farewell speech as governor of Alaska. “And here’s how they do it. They use these delicate, tiny, very talented celebrity starlets. They use Alaska as a fundraising tool for their anti-Second Amendment causes…. And by the way, Hollywood needs to know. We eat, therefore we hunt.”

Disregard for now that last folksy joke — I mean, what’s not funny about tracking, shooting and skinning the people who make movies and TV shows? — the truth is Palin is wrong; Hollywood’s critics are wrong. In 2009, Hollywood helped save America.

The argument comes down to two facts: soft power and hard currency.

As the economy went into freefall, and no one was buying American homes, cars, or chazerei, everyone was lining up to buy our movies. 2009 was a record year, with more than $10 billion in U.S. and Canadian ticket sales and record numbers overseas as well (as of this week, January crossed the $1 billion mark for the first time ever). Hollywood did all this without a single bailout dollar or executive compensation scandal — maybe it is un-American after all.

As our cash ran low, so did America’s influence and reputation abroad. Our previous president was deeply unpopular abroad — no judgment, just a fact — as have been our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Hollywood again to the rescue. American TV and movies have won hearts where American policy hasn’t, or can’t. The majority of the populations of Arab countries are under 25, and they are major consumers of American TV and movies.

It has been this way for ages. Back in 1984, I toured Southern Lebanon in the aftermath of the First Lebanon War. There was one busy store in the burned-out, war-ravaged port city of Sidon — a video store. Its window was plastered with posters of — you guessed it — Sylvester Stallone.

Critics of globalization will often mention McDonald’s and Hollywood together as examples of America’s “soft power” — the influence a country wields through culture, philanthropy and image. But that’s unfair. Hollywood at its best makes you feel and think and wonder. McDonald’s at its best still makes you fat and sick.

Hollywood’s power comes from its ability to shape the world through stories. Of course not everyone in Hollywood is Jewish, but it was Jews in Los Angeles, at the beginning of the last century, who merged the nascent technology of celluloid with the business of entertainment.

“The artistic triumph of American Jewry lay not in the novels of the 1950s, but in the movies of the 1930s,” Updike wrote, “those gargantuan, crass contraptions whereby Jewish brains projected Gentile stars upon a Gentile nation, and out of their own immigrant joy gave a formless land dreams and even a kind of conscience.”

The word may come forth from Zion, but the images come from Hollywood. Today, when the Web, cable and mobile apps divide and conquer people’s attention, movies and TV remain the most powerful single way to reach people to lead, educate and inspire.

My favorite movies of 2009 — “Inglourious Basterds,” “A Serious Man” and the Israeli movie, “Ajami” — all have indelible stories and enduring characters that can shake up perceptions and change values. That is power.

Last month, at a banquet at the Beverly Hilton, Steven Spielberg received the America’s Democratic Legacy Award from the Anti-Defamation League. In his acceptance speech, he said it even better than Updike, or me: “All it takes is the right story at the right moment, one true story, to make the world think.”

Hollywood Zion Read More »

Step-Up Nation

Yonatan Yagodovsky, director of the international desk at Magen David Adom (MDA) in Israel, remembers exactly where he was when he first heard about the earthquake in Haiti. It was 6 a.m., and he was in the bathroom of his home in Jerusalem, shaving. He immediately called Ohad Shaked, the MDA’s specialist in earthquake preparedness, who rushed to the Situation Room in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, where, by 8 a.m., a group of experts from the humanitarian group ZAKA, El Al airlines, the MDA, the Israel Defense Forces, the Foreign Ministry and the Health Ministry were meeting to plan Israel’s response to the disaster.

When Yagodovsky talks about the first 24 hours of the Israeli response, it’s with the quick cadence of machine-gun fire.

“It’s all about coordination and speed,” he told me over a lunch in Beverly Hills with representatives of MDA and the Israeli Consulate.

This coordination took place internally, within Israel, and externally, with groups like the United Nations and Red Cross. Most importantly, the Israeli mission needed an OK to land in Haiti from the U.S. Army, which was already working to secure the Haitian airport.

Within 24 hours, Yagodovsky told me, two El Al cargo planes were on their way to Haiti — one carrying a field hospital and another carrying staff and supplies (including kosher food for those who required it).

Meanwhile, the Israeli Ambassador to the Dominican Republic, Amos Radian, had commandeered a caravan of Jeeps and trucks, which drove 16 hours straight to the Haitian airport to help unload and deliver supplies.

By Friday, the Israeli field hospital was being set up near the Port-au-Prince airport and included the following: 40 doctors, 25 nurses, a team of paramedics, a pharmacy, a children’s ward, a radiology department, an intensive-care unit, an emergency room, two operating rooms, a surgical department, an internal medicine department and a maternity ward.

One of the first people rescued on Saturday was a top income-tax official who had been trapped for four days under the rubble of the collapsed government building.

Within a few days, 13 Israeli rescue missions had been sent out, 172 surgeries performed and more than 500 patients treated at the field hospital. And eight babies were born.

Yagodovsky didn’t go to Haiti for the rescue — but he was in constant contact with his people. MDA provided staff and assistance to the Israeli mission as well to the international efforts that would follow. I asked him what made the Israelis respond so quickly.

“It’s very difficult to transition from a state of routine to one of emergency,” he told me. “So you have to incorporate the idea of emergency from the very beginning, in everything you do and everything you teach.”

As he spoke, Shahar Azani, who works with the Israeli Consulate here in Los Angeles, did something perfectly Israeli: he jumped into the conversation in a wild burst of excitement to tell a story of his own.

Five years ago, while Azani was stationed in Kenya, he and a colleague were visiting a school in one of the slums when they saw a pregnant woman being carried in a wheelbarrow. They realized that this was because there were no ambulances. So they quickly contacted Yossi Baratz from MASHAV, the division of the Foreign Ministry that specializes in humanitarian assistance, and they all got to work.

Baratz called a friend at MDA, which just happened to have two old ambulances they had stripped and were about to sell as regular vans. Instead, they re-equipped them as ambulances and offered them to MASHAV. Meanwhile, Azani called a friend at ZIM, the Israeli shipping company, which offered to ship the ambulances at no cost.

The first ambulance made its way to the city of Kwale, southwest of Mombasa in Kenya. The ambulance was the first ever to serve nearly 500,000 people living in the district.

As Azani was telling the story, Yagodovsky jumped in with an interruption of his own. Guess who was Baratz’s friend at MDA who had arranged for the two ambulances? That’s right: Yonatan Yagodovsky.

Small world, indeed.

While Azani and Yagodovsky did their few minutes of high-octane Jewish geography, I just sat back and absorbed the scene that had just unfolded. Here were a couple of Israeli Jews whose greatest source of satisfaction seemed to be helping people in desperate need.

At no point did the idea of “good PR for Israel” come up.

When I mentioned to Yagodovsky that Israel’s heroic efforts in Haiti were spreading a lot of much-needed positive vibes about Israel, he gave me an awkward look, as if to say: “That’s nice, but that’s not why we do it.”

In fact, there may be many reasons why Israel “does it”— an empathy for human suffering, lots of practice at emergency rescue, a belief in tikkun olam, a desire to be accepted by the world — but Yagodovsky didn’t mention any of those.

“Maybe we’re stupid and naïve,” he told me. “We just want to help.”

David Suissa is the founder of OLAM magazine and OLAM.org. You can read his daily blog at suissablog.com and e-mail him at {encode=”dsuissa@olam.org” title=”dsuissa@olam.org”}.

Step-Up Nation Read More »

Post-Traumatic Makeup Counter Disorder

What is it with the carts in the mall that want me to try their dead sea products, hair-straightening irons and switch my cell phone provider over to theirs?  How come I can get their attention, but I am not worthy of the new fragrance spritz in the cosmetic section of a department store?  And why is it that I have to wait for almost twenty minutes at the Mac counter to pay for the eyeshadow that I chose myself and found boxed behind the register?  If I could just ring it up myself – i wouldnt need them at all in the first place. 

You would think I have other things to worry about.  Not that I truly do care in the first place…that much.  Why does it get me every time when I am ignored at the makeup counter? (Which is not often, since it is pretty rare that I go to one.)  I guess it could be worse – I could get stopped by the Proactive cart – acne care products endorsed by Jessica Simpson.

Usually when I hear someone speak of Mac, I think of the computers first and not a trendy makeup counter with sales personnel (both male and female) clad in all black with rainbow-hued eyelids.  When I think Mac, I think of rainbow colored iPods, not eyelids.  But i guess it does get to me now and again when I’m not worthy (or so they make me feel) of girly pleasures (not that Macs also known as Apple are un-girly, but I spend more time using my iPhone and MacBook, then the times I do shop for, put on and remove makeup altogether). 

The scary-looking-peacock-eyelid-goth salesgirl finally rang me up as if she were doing me a favor.  I didn’t need the eyeshadow thaaat bad.  I debated putting it back to spite her, but figured the other two I had at home were so old they probably wouldn’t look pretty under a microscope.

I can’t even remember the last time I bought makeup.  What I do remember, however, was that it was a traumatic experience.  I remember running over (not literally) to the mall for some tinted moisturizer.  You slap it on and go…literally (the perfect makeup regimen for me).  No need for all those layers that I read about in fashion and beauty magazines that tell me that for a natural look I need base, powder and all the stuff that goes on before it and after it.  Who has the time or patience?  Not I.  Anyway…back to the trauma of the tinted moisturizer….

I headed straight to the makeup counter with my son…once again helping myself, I headed directly to the boxed product on the shelf, grabbed one and waited at the register to pay.  The next thing I know, I was sitting on a stool by the makeup counter with an impatient son (for good reason), getting a tinted moisturizer color check.  (How she talked me into it, I will never know?  I thought that if I caved, maybe it would send a message to all other makeup counters everywhere to stop ignoring me.  (As you can see from the Mac eyeshadow purchase, it didn’t help.)  So, I sat on the stool and told her it was ok, and that I know that color works for me because I have used it for years.  (I’m not big on makeup…or change.)  Next thing I know she is using a cotton swab that reeks of lavender to remove the makeup I am already wearing, but I wasn’t wearing any.  To make matters worse, I am allergic to lavender.  I stopped her and jumped off the stool hoping that my cheek wouldn’t swell into the size of a bowling ball.  She still went down her list of recommendations for me.  I told her I just needed to pay and probably take a Benadryl or two.  She wasn’t happy, but my son was.  I would have been happier if my cheek didn’t start to swell.  (Two Benadryls later – I was fine.)

Then there was another time that I tried getting a “makeover” at the Mac counter to surprise my husband.  When he took one look at the “new me,” he laughed which was appropriate since I looked like a clown (clowns scare me, but they make him laugh).

I can’t seem to win.  I guess I am not lucky when it comes to makeup counters and it is probably even better that they won’t help me. 

So maybe it’s best that I avoid makeup counters all together in the near future, or at least until they have self-checkout lines like the ones in the grocery store…until then I will just be hanging out at the other Mac store.

Post-Traumatic Makeup Counter Disorder Read More »

Parent Power

“Raw power, an unabashed transfer of political power to parents.”

That’s how Ben Austin describes Parent Revolution, the organization he founded and heads up, which aims to shake up Los Angeles’ public schools. It aims to remove the administration and faculty from low performing schools, and, if the parents desire, convert them to charter schools, which are independently operated, without strong unions, and financed by LAUSD.

Austin is a parent whose daughter will enter the Los Angeles public school system after she graduates from Temple Israel of Hollywood’s preschool. He has served as a political aide in the Clinton White House and in Richard Riordan’s City Hall. Public education reform is one of Riordan’s big interests, and after Austin left city hall in 2001, he continued to work on his old boss’ issue, independently and with Riordan and others interested in education. In fact, Austin planned to run for the school board in the Westside district in 2008, but had to drop out after a campaign assistant fouled up gathering the signatures needed to get him on the ballot.

A few months later, with backing from the private nonprofit foundations of arts and education philanthropist Eli Broad and Casey Wasserman (a philanthropist and the grandson of entertainment scion Lew Wasserman) and others, Austin and a few other parents created Parent Revolution, for which he serves as executive director. He also is a part-time prosecutor in the city attorney’s office. Parent Revolution, which now has an annual budget of about $500,000, began by organizing parents of students at Garfield High School in East Los Angeles and Mark Twain Middle School in the Mar Vista-Venice area. It plans to move on to other schools.

“We represented half of the parents in the enrollment boundaries,” he said. “After that, more parents came to us.” Then they sought help from L.A. Mayor Villaraigosa and allies on the school board. Last spring, members of the group met downtown and went to the school district headquarters. The result of this activity was a plan, presented by the mayor in 2009, which called for 250 school campuses, including some new ones, to be turned into charter organizations or other nonprofit groups. The teachers union, United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA), opposes the idea. But in a surprising defeat for the usually powerful union, the school board adopted the plan. Last month the teachers union filed suit to block its implementation.

The mayor’s plan is loaded down with bureaucratic obstacles. It may take a long time to implement. And with final decision making on how to implement the plan left to Superintendent Ramon Cortines, parents may be pretty much cut out of working out final details.

Looking for something better, Parent Revolution and other reformers went to Sacramento. This was a gamble, since the legislature traditionally has been firmly under the heel of the California Teachers Association, which represents more than 340,000 teachers and other school personnel around the state. “We didn’t have lobbyists, we didn’t have a ton of money,” Austin said.

But the political situation has been changing. President Barack Obama’s Race to the Top program promised $4.3 billion in federal funds to states that would require teachers to be judged by student test results. The Obama administration also insisted that states make it easier to form charter schools.

In the financially strapped Capitol, the promise of federal funds turned out to have more influence than the California Teachers Association. After a struggle, with Parent Revolution taking part in the lobbying, the California legislature passed a bill forcing districts to make major changes when 50 percent of a school’s parents sign a petition. This would apply to a limited number of poor-performing schools in a district. Those schools could become charters. The principal and teaching staff could be replaced. Or the school could be closed.

Under the state law, parents wanting to transform their school would have to sign up 50 percent or more of the parents in an enrollment area. This would trigger the process of change. Parent Revolution is an organizing group, with no plans to actually run schools. Its important role would be to train parent volunteers in how to sign up people and talk to them about the issues. After that, the parents themselves would decide whether they wanted a charter or to simply replace the principals and teachers with a new crew.

The measure also permits parents in the state’s 1,000 worst-performing schools to transfer their children to other schools. Performance of children and teachers would be measured by tests.

The specifics of just how this would work are yet to be worked out. The State Board of Education will write the regulations that will implement the state legislation. These regulations would determine what kind of organization would actually run a school. Just how the state law will mesh with the plan adopted by the Los Angeles Board of Education last year is unclear. It could sweep aside the cumbersome LAUSD program.

“We think it is the most important reform in the country, and it came out of Parent Revolution,” Austin said.

Parent Revolution’s particular foe is UTLA and its contracts with the Los Angeles Unified School District. Critics of L.A.’s schools say such contracts make it all but impossible to remove or discipline poorly performing teachers. Austin believes the current contracts are “restrictive contracts that don’t have anything to do with kids, where there is no accountability.”

A.J. Duffy, the UTLA president, disagrees. “Far too often, UTLA’s stance against outside operators is painted in a negative light — that our members don’t want our schools taken over simply because we don’t want to lose union members or weaken our contract,” he wrote on the union’s Web site. “That conveniently ignores what we all know to be true: Day after day, teachers and health and human services professionals put students first. It’s in our DNA. It’s why we work long hours for low pay. It’s why we stay up until midnight working on a new lesson plan after a TV show sparked an idea for teaching fractions. It’s why we spend that Target gift card on school supplies instead of a needed microwave.”

The combative Duffy and his union are expected to resist as Parent Revolution circulates its petitions in schools around the city, promising parents, in Austin’s words, “if you organize half the parents in your school, we promise you a great school.”

Sounds like a schoolyard fight. Hopefully, the students won’t be the losers.

Bill Boyarsky is a columnist for The Jewish Journal, Truthdig and LA Observed, and the author of “Inventing L.A.: The Chandlers and Their Times” (Angel City Press).

Parent Power Read More »