fbpx

December 4, 2009

Philanthropist pleads guilty to bribes

Elliott Broidy, a leading investor in the Israeli economy and major donor and activist in the Los Angeles Jewish community, pleaded guilty Thursday to the felony charge of rewarding official misconduct.

According to New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Broidy admitted that he made nearly $1 million in payoffs to four senior New York state officials as he pursued an investment from the state public pension fund. He has agreed to forfeit $18 million in management fees and a judge may impose a sentence of up to four years in prison following Broidy’s guilty plea, the Wall Street Journal reported. The development is part of Cuomo’s wide-ranging pay-to-play probe on whether decisions about how to invest retirees’ money in the giant pension fund were wrongly influenced by money and politics.

Cuomo said that Broidy has acknwoledged paying at least $75,000 for high-price luxury trips to Italy and Israel for a top official in the New York State Comptroller and his relatives. Several media sources quoted unnamed sources identifying the official as the former comptroller Alan Hevesi; his lawyer reportedly declined to comment.

By raising $800 million, Broidy turned his Markstone Capital Group into the largest private equity fund in Israel, at a time when the intifada was at its height and most investors were shunning the Jewish state. In Los Angeles, Broidy has been a major donor to the United Jewish Fund and Friends of the Israel Defense Forces, a trustee of the University of Southern California and USC Hillel, and has served on the Hebrew Union College board of governors and as a trustee of Wilshire Boulevard Temple.

He is credited with revitalizing the dormant California-Israel Chamber of Commerce in the mid-1990s, together with Stanley Gold and Stanley Chais. Gold is president and CEO of Shamrock Holdings and outgoing president of the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles. Chais, a large contributor to Israeli and Jewish causes, faces three legal actions as an alleged middleman for Bernard Madoff.

Broidy has also been a GOP heavy hitter, serving as finance chairman of the Republican National Committee and a top fund raiser for the presidential campaigns of President George W. Bush in 2004 Sen. John McCain in 2008.

Gold said that he has known Broidy for some 20 years and worked with him on behalf of the local Jewish federation and Wilshire Boulevard Temple, as well as the California-Israel Chamber of Commerce. “Elliott has given freely of his time and energy to the community, of which he has been an outstanding member,” Gold said. “Our hearts go out to him and his family at this difficult time.”

Gold added, “Elliott is a decent and good man. It is not my style to desert a friend in his hour of need.”

Broidy’s New York attorney Christopher Clark issued a statement saying that his client “regrets the actions that brought about this course of events, but is pleased to have resolved this matter with the New York Attorney General and will be cooperating in the ongoing investigation.”

Clark also said that Broidy has “resigned from all operational, supervisory, and other roles at the firm of Markstone Partners in order to focus his attention on legal matters.”

Philanthropist pleads guilty to bribes Read More »

Obama Takes on Maxine Waters—Bravo!

This past week, Congresswoman Maxine Waters and nine other members of the Congressional Black Caucus (“CBC”) attacked the Obama administration, claiming the president and those around him have not been sensitive to the plight of blacks, who they claim have suffered disproportionately due to the nation’s struggling economy.

The ten CBC members threatened that unless the administration moved to offer some programmatic solutions, they would mobilize all forty three members of the Caucus to sandbag the president’s economic agenda in the House. Waters argued that Caucus members had to “educate” those around Obama to the particular economic woes that blacks faced.  This claim seems most directed at White House chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel – someone that Waters has previously clashed with directly.

The most pressing claim by Waters and the others is that Obama and his administration is ignoring urban unemployment.  Always the vocal, and often strident, racial advocate, Waters said “”We can no longer be in denial that certain sectors of our population, including the African-American community, are feeling the recession to a greater extent.”

This may well be the case.  And it is true that black unemployment has historically lagged behind that of the general population.  However, despite heated rhetoric and ongoing claims from predictable voices like Congresswoman Waters, over the past few generations it has become increasingly difficult to directly correlate black unemployment with racism, discrimination or governmental neglect. 

Further, claims by the ten CBC members that Obama should design racially-specific solutions to black suffering, is an insult.  The nation is in the midst of a nationally-felt economic recession – something that has caused pain and suffering in virtually every sector and region of our society. 

The arguments from Waters, and the other CBC members, indicate they may believe Obama’s charge is to carry their ideological water and fulfill an old-style black racial agenda.  However, the president’s job is not to be “the black president.” His task, among all the other domestic and international issues on his plate, is to steer this nation back to economic prosperity, something all Americans, no matter their skin color, would benefit from.

Stung by Waters criticism, Obama fired back, telling his CBC critics that “

the most important thing I can do for the African-American community is the same thing I can do for the American community, period, and that is get the economy going again and get people hiring again

.”

Even more directly to the Waters’ claims, the President warned, “

I think it is a mistake to start thinking in terms of particular ethnic segments of the United States rather than to think that we are all in this together and we are all going to get out of this together.

For this Obama deserves to be roundly applauded.  He cannot allow the Black Caucus to push him toward piece-meal solutions to our problems. The idea that our nation is some sort of loose confederation of competing racial groups may have served as the vision for old-style multiculturalism, but is nothing less than a formula for ethnic and racial Balkanization.

I’m encouraged by Obama’s stance on this.  It follows his key decision to give General McChrystal most of the troops he’d requested for the fight against Islamic fundamentalists in Afghanistan.  And make no mistake; this was a courageous move – albeit a delayed one. 

His decision has alienated and angered many in Obama’s base on the political left.  Everyone from MoveOn.org and the Daily Kos, the foul-mouthed Jon Stewart, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews, along with Keith Olberman (outside of Glenn Beck, two of the craziest men working in cable television) to the consistently left-oriented Congresswomen Barbara Lee and Maxine Waters have evidenced their “displeasure” over the impending troop deployments.

The right has contended that the Obama presidency has accomplished nothing of substance since the inauguration.  Now some liberals have joined that chorus.  Obama was recently skewered for his lack of accomplishments on a “Saturday Night Live” skit.  What’s notable is that this show’s never been known for its even-handed treatment of conservative political views. 

But now, the popular comedy show’s writers may have to go back to the drawing board.  Obama has made what may be the most critical decision a president can ever be faced with – sending young Americans into harm’s way.  Less critical, but not unimportant, is that he’s now taken on the racial complainers within the Congressional Black Caucus.  Things are looking up at the White House.

Obama Takes on Maxine Waters—Bravo! Read More »

Palestinian leader files $110 million lawsuit against Sacha Baron Cohen’s ‘Bruno’

The leader of the Palestinian nationalist militia al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades has filed a $110 million defamation lawsuit against the makers of “Bruno” (and incidentally, David Letterman) for portraying the group, classified as a terrorist organization by the United States, Israel, Canada and the European Union, according to Wikipedia, as—wait for it—terrorists.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, who first reported the story but mislabeled the group the “Al Aqsa Bartyrs Brigade,” Palestinian Fatah leader Ayman Abu Aita is filing a libel and slander lawsuit against Sacha Baron Cohen and NBC Universal over his portrayal in “Bruno.”  Abu Aita is claiming Cohen misrepresented himself as a German filmmaker making a film about the Palestinian cause, and is angry over the film’s alleged portrayal of him as a “terrorist group leader,” writes THR.

David Letterman is getting caught in the crossfire as CBS will be named a defendant in the suit, since Letterman’s “The Late Show” featured the disputed scene during an interview with Cohen last July.

But Abu Aita is wading in rocky waters. He wants to be seen solely as a Palestinian political leader while disavowing his ties to the terrorist arm that is as close to the Palestinian state militia as there is.

Cohen told Letterman that Abu Aita was the leader of a “nasty group, the al-Aqsa Martyr Brigades the kind of number one suicide bombers out there.” He also claimed that he met Abu Aita in a secret location near the Ain al-Hilweh refugee camp in South Lebanon and that both parties had bodyguards.

Accordingly to the far left Marxist blog BermudaRadical, the account furnished by Cohen is “a complete lie” and, at least according to the writers, “Ayman Abu Aita is a well-known, respected activist in the West Bank who works with a non-profit organization and is affiliated with the ruling party Fatah. He is easy to find, travels freely and…asserts that the interview was held in Bethlehem, in a hotel popular among tourists… that there were no bodyguards, just Cohen, himself, a Palestinian journalist and a small camera crew.”

However, even Abu Aita’s Web supporters allow that, “In Palestine, every major political party has a corresponding military wing. Because the nation has been forged under conditions of violent occupation, no political party can be relevant without participating in the anti-colonial resistance. Al-Aqsa is the military wing of Fatah and has long been a major force in the Palestinian liberation struggle.”

That’s not exactly denying Abu Aita’s leadership in the group. And by the way, a group whose stated mission is to end Israel’s presence in the West Bank and Gaza Strip through violent resistance. According the the Council on Foreign Relations, “[T]he group initially vowed to target only Israeli soldiers and settlers in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, [but] in early 2002 it joined Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad in a spree of terrorist attacks against civilians in Israeli cities.”

Abu Aita is filing this lawsuit in the federal court in the District of Columbia, perhaps aware of the fact that it would never stand up in a town full of Hollywood Jews. But I do wish him luck proving his case to a court that has already declared his territory’s government militia to be a terrorist organization.

Palestinian leader files $110 million lawsuit against Sacha Baron Cohen’s ‘Bruno’ Read More »

How to make Potato Latkes – A Chanukah Treat

How to make Potato Latkes – A Chanukah Treat Read More »

Lemierre Syndrome: Rethinking Pharyngitis in Young Adults

One of the first outpatient problems a primary care trainee learns to manage is sore throat.  The current algorithm is fairly simple.  Most sore throats are caused by viruses and will not improve with antibiotics.  Symptomatic medication for pain and fever is the best we can offer.  But a significant minority of sore throats is caused by a bacterium called group A β-hemolytic streptococcus.  These cases are more commonly known as “strep throat”.  In strep throat antibiotics shorten the duration of symptoms by a day or two, but more importantly antibiotics prevent acute rheumatic fever, a potentially dangerous complication of untreated strep throat.

So the algorithm for evaluating sore throats is: decide if it’s strep.  If it is (or has a reasonable likelihood of being) strep then treat with antibiotics; otherwise don’t.

An article in this issue of Annals of Internal Medicine suggests that this algorithm is inadequate in adolescents and young adults.  The reason is that about 10% of sore throats in patients between 15 and 24 years old is caused by a bacterium called Fusobacterium necrophorum.  (Please memorize that name and mention it at your next holiday party.)  F. necrophorum also causes Lemierre Syndrome, a bacterial infection of the internal jugular vein that results in the bacteria spreading elsewhere in the body.  Lemierre Syndrome frequently results in permanent harm and is sometimes fatal.  Though much remains unknown about F. necrophorum, it appears to cause sore throats as commonly as strep in adolescents and young adults, and Lemierre Syndrome in this age group appears to be more common than acute rheumatic fever.

Diagnosing F. necrophorum pharyngitis is problematic.  F. necrophorum doesn’t grow on a standard throat culture.  (It’s anaerobic, meaning it only grows in the absence of oxygen.)  And specific molecular tests for it are not commercially available.

So the author recommends that antibiotics be prescribed for 15 to 24 year olds with sore throats and at least 3 of the following 4 findings.

  • history of fever
  • pus on the tonsils
  • swollen tender lymph nodes in the neck
  • absence of cough

(Note for doctors: use penicillins or cephalosporins.  Macrolides are ineffective against F. necrophorum.)

In that age group worsening symptoms or neck swelling should be alarm signs that F. necrophorum is present.

Our simplest clinical problem just got more complicated.  That’s a good sign that we’re learning something.

Learn more:

Annals of Internal Medicine article:  Lemierre Syndrome: Rethinking Pharyngitis in Young Adults Read More »

Judge Richard Goldstone wins Swedish human rights award

Richard Goldstone won the Stockholm Human Rights Award.

The prize, according to media reports, is given by the International Legal Assistance Consortium, the Swedish Bar Association and the International Bar Association for “an outstanding contribution to promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.” The award cited the South African jurist’s “extraordinary career” in fighting for human rights.

The U.N. report Goldstone authored on the Gaza war called on both Israel and Hamas to investigate alleged war crimes and came under heavy criticism from Israel, which said the report negated Israel’s right to self-defense.

The U.N. General Assembly overwhelmingly endorsed the report last month, while the U.S. House of Representatives condemned it.

Judge Richard Goldstone wins Swedish human rights award Read More »

Jewish Life in Pagoda Land Burma

Jewish life in Burma today is quite different from what it was during colonial times, which lasted until World War II.  Before the war, it still was the case that “the sun never set” on the British Empire, including in Southeast Asia. Jewish merchants, who migrated originally to Burma in the late 1800s, served as a natural conduit between the British colonial rulers and the export–import community abroad. The Jewish community of approximately 2,500 people was a respected presence in business and a valued part of local society. During this “Golden Age,” Jewish influence within the government and society as a whole grew rapidly.

Jews were incorporated into the life of the country and played a prominent part in various fields. In tropical Rangoon, Jews owned ice factories and bottling plants. Some dealt in textiles and timber, while others were customs officials and traders. Jews held a designated seat on the Rangoon Municipal Committee. The Jewish community in Burma was so influential, in fact, that in the first years of the century, Rangoon and the smaller city of Bassein had Jewish mayors, and Judah Ezekiel Street in downtown Rangoon was named to honor a Jew. The Sofaer family donated the iron gates to the Rangoon Zoo, and another Jew, Mordechai Isaac Cohen, donated the beautiful cast-iron bandstand in Bandoola Square. Both are still standing tall today. 

In the center of downtown Rangoon (now Yangon) stood Musmeah Yeshua, the grand synagogue with its soaring ceiling and graceful columns. Musmeah Yeshua, one of 188 sites on the list of Yangon Heritage Buildings, was constructed in the 1890s. The Jewish cemetery, with more than 600 gravestones, and the synagogue with its 126 silver sifrei Torah (Torah scrolls) and Jewish school for over 200 students, proclaimed Jewish affluence and comfort in this lush land.

As Jewish wealth grew in those early days, Jewish philanthropy grew as well. The community donated large sums for local schools, libraries, hospitals, and helped local Burmese in many different ways. The Burmese were very appreciative of this aid and the country was a welcome and tolerant home for Jews for many years.

The golden days of Jewish life in Burma came to a close when the Japanese invaded in 1941. Japanese occupation forced most of the Jewish community, along with most of the British colonial population, to flee to other countries. Some Jews returned after the war, but they soon realized that the beautiful life they remembered was no more and their homes and wealth were gone. 

Even so, there were promising relations between postwar Burma and the new State of Israel. Burma and Israel both achieved their independence in 1948 and Burma recognized the State of Israel in 1949; it was the first Asian country to do so. Burmese Prime Minister U Nu was the first foreign head of state to visit the newly independent State of Israel, in 1955. In 1961, Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion spent two weeks in Burma. President Yitzhak Ben-Zvi, Golda Meir, Moshe Dayan, and Shimon Peres also visited Burma.  Despite these cordial relations, Jews found it difficult to regain their lives and re-establish their businesses in Burma after World War II. The Jews of Burma scattered—to Israel, Australia, England, and the United States. Since then, the Burmese Jewish community has continued to decrease in population. 

Today, only a handful of Jews live in Burma. For more than 35 years, my family has taken care of the synagogue, cemetery, and what remains of the community. Burma and the Jewish community is always our home and history since 1890s or even early when my great-grandparents left Baghdad to start a new life in the vibrant city of Rangoon. During World War II, my grandfather, Isaac Samuels, risked his life for the synagogue; today, we still revere the same building and its history, which encompasses Jewish life in Burma. 

Every day, my father sits in the quiet synagogue,  waiting to greet Jewish visitors and to share with them this rich and unique history of the Jewish community of Burma. Every Friday, my father and I would wait at the synagogue for Jewish visitors until we could gather the minyan (requisite ten people) to begin services. My father posted this sign on the front door of the synagogue: “A tree may be alone in the field; a man alone in the world, but a Jew is never alone on his Holy Days.” It is my father’s belief that no Jew should be alone during the holidays—and yet most of the time, only the two of us can be found in the synagogue. Even if only he and I present, I always feel the echoes of the many Shabbat services that took place in this beautiful synagogue and hear the melodies of the songs our ancestors sang when the community was at its peak.

We may not be able to return to the glorious days of Jewish life, but the community believes that, through tourism, we will be able to make a difference in keeping the Jewish spirit alive in Burma. In 2005, we started the travel agency Myanmar Shalom, with the goal of linking Jews around the world to our small community and enabling visitors to explore and experience this beautiful country about which Rudyard Kipling wrote “This is Burma and it will be quite unlike any land you know.” 

Through years of isolation, the country has managed to retain many of its cultural traditions and preserve much of its historical heritage—making it one of the few remaining places on earth that truly can bring a visitor back in time to experience the Asia of old. Whatever the politics of visiting Burma, the tourist will find a nation of gentle folk and smiling people, rich archaeological sites, glittering pagodas, colorful bazaars, and joyous festivals.

Among many other programs, Myanmar Shalom hosted its unique “Southeast Asia through Jewish Eyes” with Lotus Travels brought more than 30 participants led by Rabbi Marvin Tokayer, creator of “Journeys through Jewish Eyes,” and one of the world’s foremost authorities on the Asian Jewish experience.

For many years, the synagogue has not had a local minyan, so the group visit makes a difference to this small community—once again filling the Rangoon synagogue with joy and song.

I often think about the history of the Jewish community in Burma—from its “golden days” before World War II, when the synagogue was filled with more than 300 people for all congregational activities, the Jewish holy days, the weddings and bar/bat mitzvah ceremonies. No matter where the descendants of Jews from Burma now live, the synagogue Musmeah Yeshua always will remain an important landmark of Jewish history in Southeast Asia for all of us and a reminder of the very vibrant and lively community that once lived in Burma. 

Today, only a few of us are left in Burma, but our Jewish spirit is still alive and our prayer services still continue. I hope that through tourism the Jewish community may begin to revive and that our beautiful synagogue once again will be filled with joy and song as we continue our historic role in the life and welfare of the country.

More information about Jewish Community of Burma: Almost Englishmen: Baghdadi Jews in British Burma by Dr. Ruth Fredman Cernea

More information about Myanmar Shalom: www.myanmarshalom.com

Jewish Life in Pagoda Land Burma Read More »

Monday The Rabbi Saw “Basterds”

Rabbi Mark Diamond is Executive Vice President of the Southern California Board of Rabbis.

On Monday the rabbi went to the movies.  More accurately, a large group of rabbis and Jewish leaders attended a private screening of Inglourious Basterds sponsored by the Jewish Journal, the Israeli Consulate and the Board of Rabbis.  Following the film, Journal editor-in-chief Rob Eshman led a discussion with producer Lawrence Bender and actor Christoph Waltz (“Col. Hans Landa”).  They were joined from the audience by actor Eli Roth (“Sgt. Donny Donowitz,” a.k.a. “The Bear Jew”) and director and writer Quentin Tarantino (an unexpected bonus). 

This was not your typical rabbis’ gathering.  Then again, Inglourious Basterds is not your typical World War II movie.  The film is set in Nazi-occupied France and tells the fictional story of a squad of Jewish-American soldiers (“the Basterds”) who foment fear throughout the Third Reich by killing and scalping Nazis.  Inglourious Basterds is replete with graphic violence, inspired performances (especially Waltz and Mélanie Laurent, who portrays French-Jewish refugee “Shoshanna Dreyfuss”), a rollercoaster ride of comical and terror-filled scenes, and enough provocative dialogue and action to keep moviegoers talking for weeks.

That’s what I appreciated most about the film – it generates strong feelings in viewers.  My informal survey of colleagues who attended the screening reveals a wide range of reactions, from positive comments (e.g. “I loved the film”) to negative ones (e.g. “Revenge is not a valid Jewish response”).  During the question and answer period after the screening, Christoph Waltz discouraged the audience from worrying about what others might say or think about Inglorious Basterds.  Instead, he encouraged viewers to form their own opinions of the film. 

I agree, for this is what a work of art is supposed to do.  For me, Inglourious Basterds is a modern-day Midrash on the Purim story.  With apologies to my traditional friends, I see the Biblical Book of Esther as an ancient Jewish fable of justice and revenge.  To wit, what would happen if the tables were turned and we had power over our enemies?  With all the merrymaking and child-centered focus of the Purim holiday, we tend to forget that the Jews of Shushan kill 75,000 of their foes toward the end of the narrative (Esther 9:16).  Then they go out and have a big party to celebrate their success. 

Put in stark terms, was this too good to be true?  Or too bad to be true?  No one I respect would disagree with the premise that it would have been glorious had a band of Jewish soldiers killed Hitler and his top henchmen.  But what do we make of scalping the heads of enemy combatants?  Or of killing innocent people who happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time (a.k.a. “collateral damage”)?  Is violent revenge the victim’s only legitimate response to terror and brutality?

These are among the difficult questions that emerge from the film.  We hear echoes of a similar debate in this week’s parasha.  As the Torah portion opens, Jacob is frightened and alone.  He has not seen Esau in twenty years, and fears that his estranged brother intends to settle old scores.  Jacob’s anxiety is heightened by the messengers’ report that Esau is approaching with an escort of four hundred men. 

The Hebrew text of the Torah captures the true extent of Jacob’s fear.  Vayira Yaakov me’od vayeitzer lo.  Literally, “Jacob was very frightened and upset.” (Gen. 32:8).  According to Jewish tradition, no word in the Torah is redundant.  Why then does the text state that Jacob was both frightened and upset.  A Midrash answers that Jacob was doubly fearful.  He was afraid that Esau and his retinue might harm him and his family.  And Jacob was upset that he might lash out in acts of hatred and revenge against his brother.  He was fearful of what it would mean for the hunted to become the hunter.

Seeing and setting Inglourious Basterds in the context of this week’s Torah portion and the Book of Esther frame my understanding of this fascinating film.  They help me to appreciate why the movie evokes such strong feelings in viewers, especially an audience of rabbis and Jewish leaders. I encourage you to see the film if you have not already done so, and to probe the disturbing issues it raises for all of us.

           

 

Monday The Rabbi Saw “Basterds” Read More »

Iran says it will only minimally cooperate with IAEA

Iran says it will only do the minimum required to cooperate with the U.N.‘s nuclear watchdog agency.

Tehran officials will only inform the International Atomic Energy Agency of its progress in building its ten new nuclear enrichment sites 180 days before it injects gas into centrifuges, and not during the construction phase of the plants, as the IAEA had demanded, according to media reports.

“According to the safeguards, after installation of equipments and only 180 days ahead of injecting gas into centrifuges … we should inform the IAEA,” senior Iranian diplomat Abolfazl Zohrehvand told the official Iranian news agency IRNA. “And we will act within the framework of the safeguard.”

The IAEA last week censured Iran for its building of a second nuclear enrichment site in Qom.

Meanwhile, in an interview Thursday with Politico, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.) said he intended to pass the Iran Refined Petroleum Sanctions Act by the end of the year, and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) told Democrats that the bill would come to the floor in the next two weeks. That legislation would sanction companies that help Iran import or produce refined petroleum, which is seen as potentially having a large impact on Iran’s economy because the country imports 40 percent of its refined petroleum.

Iran says it will only minimally cooperate with IAEA Read More »

Obama signs embassy waiver delaying move to Jerusalem

President Obama has extended a waiver for an additional six months delaying the move of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem.

It is the second time Obama has extended the waiver during his term, and follows in the footsteps of predecessors Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, who also extended the waiver every six months since the law was adopted in 1995 calling for the move of the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

Presidents are permitted to delay the move on national security grounds.

Some Jewish groups have pushed for the United States to move the embassy, as a way to bolster Israeli claims to the city. Those favoring the use of the waiver say that such a step would anger the Arab world and put the United States in the position of taking sides on an issue that should be settled in peace talks.

Obama signs embassy waiver delaying move to Jerusalem Read More »