fbpx

November 5, 2009

LETTERS: November 6-12, 2009

Who Were the Historical Inhabitants of Israel?

I am troubled by Rabbi Isaac Jeret’s “” title=”Who Owns The ‘N’ Word?”>Who Owns The ‘N’ Word?” Oct. 30) correctly points out the dangers and trivialization of Holocaust analogies to current controversies such as health care, as well as criticism of President Obama, yet he omits a significant part of the history of the use of the N word: The use of the Nazi epithet to de-legitimize and stigmatize individuals as well as nations has been utilized for over thirty yeas by two disparate groups — the anti-religious American and European left use the term Nazi as a substitute for anti-Christ, something purely evil. Conservative figures such as George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have been tarred with the term Nazi or fascist regularly by the left.

The second group to use the Nazi epithet is the Arabs and Muslims at large. This ruse attempts to hit a raw nerve with Jews but it is a ruse — the Palestinian Grand Mufti was allied with Hitler and offered to aid Germany in the Final Solution.

Therefore what is ideological among the left is used cynically by the Muslim world as a propaganda tool. The use of the Nazi and Holocaust analogies has no place in American discourse and those who recklessly trivialize it, on both sides of the aisle, should be censured.

Richard Friedman
Los Angeles


A Favorite Deli Overlooked

As a former New Yorker who’s had her fill of deli, from brises to funerals, it’s unconscionable that David Sax never even mentioned Label’s Table on Pico Boulevard in his article, “” title=”Fans Embrace Maccabi Electra at Staples”>Fans Embrace Maccabi Electra at Staples” (Oct. 30), the Clippers’ Blake Edwards’ name was spelled incorrectly.


THE JEWISH JOURNAL welcomes letters from all readers. Letters should be no more than 200 words and must include a valid name, address and phone number. Letters sent via e-mail must not contain attachments. Pseudonyms and initials will not be used, but names will be withheld on request. We reserve the right to edit all letters. Mail: The Jewish Journal, Letters, 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1510, Los Angeles, CA 90010; e-mail: {encode=”letters@jewishjournal.com” title=”letters@jewishjournal.com”}; or fax: (213) 368-1684.

LETTERS: November 6-12, 2009 Read More »

Belzberg Projects Honored

Hagy Belzberg, the principal of Belzberg Architects, was honored recently with two awards.

Belzberg was presented with the Cultural Affairs Commission Award for his work on the new building for the Los Angeles Museum of the Holocaust, which is expected to open in spring 2010 in Pan Pacific Park, during The American Institute of Architecture’s annual award ceremony at the Egyptian Theatre in Hollywood on Oct. 22. 

And the Architectural Foundation of Los Angeles recognized Belzberg’s offices at Broadway Avenue and 20th Street in Santa Monica, which received LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) gold certification, with the Design Green Award for Exceptional Design from the U.S. Green Building Council. The award was giving during the Los Angeles chapter’s Oct. 29 gala event at downtown’s Millennium Biltmore Hotel.

Belzberg is best known for his recent work on the lobby bar at the Walt Disney Concert Hall and the design of the Conga Room at LA Live, which adjoins Staples Center.

Belzberg Projects Honored Read More »

Seeing That Which is Right Before Your Eyes

Avraham Aveinu, and the Akeida story have much to teach us about the important interplay between sight and self-examination.  In fact, the word “ירא” – to see – is repeated throughout the Akeida story.

In Bereishit chapter 22 verse 4, the Torah says
וַיִּשָּׂא אַבְרָהָם אֶת־עֵינָיו וַיַּרְא אֶת־הַמָּקוֹם מֵֽרָחֹֽק
Avraham raised his eyes and saw the place from afar”.

Avraham is described as a man who is able to see into the distance.  His level of perception was so keen, that Chazal explain that he was able to “see” God, as it were.  The word Hamakom in the above-cited verse, commonly translated as “the place,” is also one of God’s many names (typically invoked in the house a mourner), and therefore the verse would read that Avraham raised his eyes and saw God from afar. 

But Avraham’s level of perception is also lacking.  Although he can see great distances, he is short sighted in other respects – he was unable to see that which was right before his eyes.  The Talmud (Brachot 13a) describes Avraham as the father to the whole world.  Not the father of Isaac. Avraham is the embodiment of hachnasat orchim (welcoming guests) – he knows exactly how to see to the needs of others – and yet, he leaves family quarrels to his wife to rectify, not being able to perceive the problems in his very own household. 

It is, however, through the experience of the Akeidah that Avraham is able to correct his vision.  As Avraham and Yitzchak embark on their journey up the mountain, Yitzchak asks, Abba, where is the lamb for the offering? Avraham answers, אֱלֹקים יִרְאֶה־לּוֹ הַשֶּׂה לְעֹלָה בְּנִי God will seek out for Himself the lamb for the offering, my son.”
Avraham can no longer answer with the abilities of one who sees God.  Thus he states in effect: “God can see clearly, elokim yireh.  But for the first time, I cannot truly see God’s plan.”  Avraham is undergoing a change.  He is losing his abilities to see past great distances, but he is gaining the ability to see the detail that surrounds him.

Suddenly, the man who could see God, must learn to perceive that which is right before him.  Right after the Angel stays Avraham’s hand, the Torah tells us again: “וַיִּשָּׂא אַבְרָהָם אֶת־עֵינָיו וַיַּרְא Abraham raised his eyes and saw”—not into the distance, like before. But right in front of him, he suddenly saw a ram—וְהִנֵּה־אַיִל.  It is possible, that the ram was there all along.  But only after he was able to truly see his son, did the God allow him to see the korban. 

Avraham began to see that what was close to him, thereby introducing him to a new level of leadership, one where he is focused not only on others, but on the building of his own family. Therefore, the Akeida story must conclude with the genealogy that leads to birth of Rebecca, because it is through Rebecca and Isaac, Avrahams’ inner family that the story continues.  Now Avraham and Yitzchak can “walk together וַיֵּֽלְכוּ יַחְדָּו,” as a cohesive family unit, bound together forever by the experience that they shared.  Avraham, the father of the world, can now settle down and direct his servant to find a wife for his son.

The Akedia represented for Avraham a transformation from one who could only perceive lofty ideals, to one who finally understood that which was most important: the family that had surrounded him all along.  Yes, Avraham is the farther of monotheism; he had to be concerned with universal truths. But the message of the Akieda is that looking outward, in the distance is not enough.  It is imperative that we are able to see that which is right before our eyes. 

Avraham names the site of the Akeidah “Hashem Yireh—the place where God will be seen.” A place where people will be blessed with the ability to see, to perceive God’s love through seeing the blessing that are right before our eyes.

Seeing That Which is Right Before Your Eyes Read More »

Hezbollah denies connection to arms smuggling ship

Hezbollah has denied any connection to a large cache of arms found on a ship intercepted by Israel.

Soldiers on Tuesday night boarded the freighter ship, flying the flag of Antigua, and discovered some 300 tons of arms and ammunition, including 3,000 rockets, disguised as commercial freight, according to the Israel Defense Forces. The ship, named the Francop, was stopped by a special naval force about 100 miles off the coast of Israel.

“Hezbollah denies any link to the weapons that the Zionist enemy claims it removed from the vessel Francop,” the group said in a statement. “At the same time it condemns Israeli piracy in international waters.”

The German-owned ship operated by a Cypriot company was en route from Iran to Syria with a planned stop in Beirut, according to Israel’s Foreign Ministry. It carried arms including Katyusha rockets, assault rifles, grenades and mortar shells, as well as an advanced anti-aircraft platform, Israel Radio reported.

The Francop left Ashdod port on Thursday after the ship was unloaded. Thirty-two trucks were required to transfer the weapons seized from the ship to a warehouse in central Israel. The military determined that the crew did not know about the arms, hidden underneath regular cargo.

Israel’s Foreign Ministry on Thursday invited diplomats from around the world to the port to view the weapons.

“The seizure of the ship was carried out as part of the navy’s ongoing intensive fight against terrorism and the prevention of weapons smuggling,” an IDF statement said.

Syria and Iran also have denied Israel’s accusations, according to Reuters.

Hezbollah denies connection to arms smuggling ship Read More »

When good people do not believe in God

Among the more surprising things that I discovered in “Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe” by Greg M. Epstein (William Morrow: $25.99, 250 pps.) is the fact that Harvard University offers its students the services of a humanist chaplain, a job held by the author himself.  “Humanism,” which the author spells with a capital “h,” has been elevated into the equivalent of a religious affiliation at one of the world’s greatest universities.

On reflection, however, perhaps I should not have been so surprised. After all, the recent best-sellers by self-proclaimed atheists like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris make it clear that there is a constituency for a moral credo that owes nothing to a divine creator. Indeed, the subtitle of Epstein’s book puts the total number of non-believers of various kinds at one billion.

Although he frequently refers to “The God Delusion” by Richard Dawkins, Epstein does not really bother much with the question of whether or not God exists, a subject that has been recently taken up in such compelling books as Karen Armstrong’s “The Case for God” or Rabbi David Wolpe’s “Why Faith Matters.”  Rather, he offers a critique of the classic rationale for organized religion among believers of all kinds — the notion that a moral code imposed on us by a higher power is essential to good conduct.  And he declares the rationale to be wholly wrong.

“It is not easy to live a good life or be a good person – with or without a god,” writes Epstein. “Tolerant, fair-minded people of all religions or none do not dwell on the question of whether we can be good without God. The answer is yes.”

Epstein holds an M.A. in Judaic studies from the University of Michigan and another M.A. in theology from Harvard Divinity School.  He is a disciple of Rabbi Sherwin Wine, the Reform rabbi who founded the Society for Humanistic Judaism, and the ethical imprint of the author’s Jewish background can be clearly seen on the pages of his book.  But Epstein insists on calling himself a “Humanist,” and he defines the term in a way that would apply to a good many people of my personal acquaintance who think of themselves as Jewish.

“If you identify as an atheist, agnostic, freethinker, rationalist, skeptic, cynic, secular humanist, naturalist, or deist; as spiritual, apathetic, nonreligious, ‘nothing’; or any other irreligious descriptive, you could probably count yourself what I call a Humanist,” he writes. “Humanism is a bold, resolute response to the fact that being a human being is lonely and frightening.”

To his credit, Epstein is ultimately less interested in labels than in what people actually believe and what people actually do.  He points out, for example, that Hitler regarded himself as an instrument of “the Almighty Creator,” and the soldiers of Nazi Germany wore belt buckles inscribed with the credo: “God is with us,” but he does not blame religion for their crimes against humanity.  Indeed, he is willing to credit both believers and non-believers with good deeds without conceding that good conduct is the result of the belief in any deity or any religion.

For example, unlike many atheists who would otherwise feel a strong affinity with Epstein, he does not uphold science as the ultimate answer to our problems. “[S]cience,” he reminds us, “won’t come and visit us in the hospital.” But the touchstone of Epstein’s belief system is the utilitarian notion that what’s good is what works: “Our morality,” he writes, “is based on human needs and social contracts.”  The fact that the so-called “Golden Rule” was embraced by both Hillel and Jesus, he suggests, does not mean that it is necessarily linked to God as he is variously described in the Jewish and Christian scriptures.

“[T]he ‘golden rule’ is golden because it’s a simple, easy-to-understand reminder that there are many reasons to be good, beyond God – and, in fact, God may not even be the real motivating force behind the good behavior of many pious people,” writes Epstein. “After all, we are evolved creatures, and much of our goodness – along with our constant struggle to bring it out – comes from the way we evolved.”

He patiently constructs his argument out of bits and pieces of religious and philosophical speculation that he draws from the last several thousand years of human history, ranging from the anonymous author of the 3,500-year-old Sanskrit hymn called the “Rig Veda” to the writings of Thomas Jefferson, whom he dubs “the world’s first truly Humanist head of state,” and much besides. Confucius, Darwin, Sartre, Churchill, John Lennon and Bill Gates should all be called humanists, according to Epstein.  In that sense, “Good Without God” is a short course in the history of humanism with a lower-case “h,” a term that has been used to describe a great many different and unrelated people and phenomena since it was coined by historians in the 19th century.

Indeed, perhaps the single most controversial proposition in “Good Without God” is the author’s insistence that “no morality is timeless and eternal.”  That kind of ethical relativism has always been a hot-button issue among religious believers who insist that some things are always wrong, whether it is the Christian fundamentalist who rejects abortion under all circumstances or the Jewish fundamentalist who rejects giving up “a piece of territory for a piece of peace,” as Yitzhak Rabin famously (and fatally) put it.

But the only absolute that Epstein embraces is that there are no absolutes. “Indeed, we Humanists can take pride in our passionate belief in a morality based on unfettered inquiry, on compassionate questioning,” he writes. “Call us ‘the keepers of the question.’” In that passage of “Good Without God,” among many others, Epstein’s essential Jewishness shines through.  In the proverbial room with ten Jews, he is the one with the eleventh opinion.

Jonathan Kirsch, author of “God Against the Gods: A History of the War Between Monotheism and Polytheism,” is the book editor of The Jewish Journal.  His book blog appears at When good people do not believe in God Read More »

Women Paid Far Less Than Men in Jewish Organizations

Anyone celebrating how far women have come since the heyday of the Women’s Movement of the 1960s and ‘70s should take a look at the survey just released by ” title=”JTN chief Jay Sanderson”>JTN chief Jay Sanderson as its new president, it was widely known that all four finalists for the job were men: Sanderson, former City Councilman Jack Weiss, former William Morris COO Irv Weintraub and Joshua Fogelson, executive director of the Minneapolis Jewish Federation. Were there no qualified women, many were asking? Or did all the great women decline to be considered?

Given the contribution women make to the Jewish community, on every level, there ought to be both more head scratching and consciousness raising on this issue. Among us all, male and female alike.

 

Women Paid Far Less Than Men in Jewish Organizations Read More »

HEEL THE WORLD

As an actress, I am expected to be a chameleon, to camouflage my self for the good of the role. Sweet and innocent as I am—without warning—I may be required to play a victimized teenager or cut-throat lawyer, without batting a natural eyelash.

I can handle a wide range of roles without a problem; transform from femme fatale to the girl next door at the drop of a hat. I’m a professional actress. My job is building a character, and I’m good at it. But often, how good you act can’t even get you to first base unless you meet the pre-acting criteria – good (as in sexy, sensual, stunning) looks. 

Okay, I can accept that. To paraphrase that wise old king, “There’s a time for looking good, and a time for looking yourself.” 

For me, getting in touch with my feminine side means being comfortable. I am at my best, and most confident, dressed in corduroy pants, T-shirt and sneakers.

And therein lies the rub! I always assumed that who I am and the roles I play are two separate things. I am only an actress on set. But apparently, things aren’t as simple as that… well at least according to Jim.

Last night, I’m waiting in the rain, at our usual meeting spot when Jim’s Cherokee pulls over. I run to take cover inside his jeep, but as I pull on the handle, the door locks go down. I look inside at Jim, and tap the window. But still, the doors remain locked. Getting wetter by the second, I bang angrily on the window, yelling “Open up, I’m drowning out here, you idiot!”  Finally, the window rolls down and Jim stares angrily at me as though I had done a terrible thing.

“I’m not letting you into my car, and certainly not taking you to the party looking like that!” says my very metro-sexual (although he insists, straight) friend, dressed like a true Tel Avivi.  I grab the door handle from the inside and pull it up. As the door opens I rush inside.

“What’s your problem? I’m fine!” I wring my hair out, secretly enjoying Jim’s shocked expression as rivulets of rainwater soak his precious leather seats.

“Tiferet, didn’t I tell you this was an up-scale party?” he scolds me, disgusted by my nonchalant attitude. “And didn’t I tell you we’d be meeting big-shots there? Didn’t I also tell you that there would be media there? And to look your best?!

“Uh huh,” I nod, drying my face on his $400 cashmere scarf. “You did. That’s why I’m wearing my best water-soaked sweater, and best water-logged boots!” I raise a boot onto the dashboard for him to see. A little waterfall splashes onto his carpet.

Jim cringes. “I meant wear a little black dress! You need to show some skin! Show some class!”

“Are you crazy? It’s freezing outside! I’m not gonna’ be cold just for the sake of looking sheek! YOU come in a little black dress if it’s so important to you.” And match the tights and necklace to go with it, I mumble under my breath.

“What %@#&!” he curses, shoving my boot off the dash. “And you’re supposed to wear heels!”

“I don’t do heels.”

“What is that supposed to mean, every woman does heels!”

“Not me, they’re dangerous.”

“No they’re not. I never heard of a woman getting killed wearing heels.”

“It’s not me I’m worried about. It’s everyone around me. I have no balance in heels. I trip over or under anything in my way. Ask my date of last week. He called yesterday to say that ‘the doctors think they can save my toe’. Is that what you want?”

“Don’t be silly,” he answers, starting the engine and driving in the wrong direction. “But look at you, Tiferet,” he suddenly blurts out, almost in tears, “You may as well have come out in pajamas!”

“You’d like that wouldn’t you. Me coming to the party in baby-dolls or a silk – Hey, where are you going?”

“To the mall, I’m not taking you to the party looking like this. And look at your hair, it’s not done up at all. You’re an actress, you’re supposed to look Sheek, not Shuk!” (the Hebrew word for marketplace). Then he squints at me as though seeing me for the first time.

“Woman, have you just landed from Mars? You’re not even wearing any makeup! YOU need a makeover.”

Silence.

“Venus,” I point out.

“What?”

“Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. Shows what you know.”

Jim isn’t sure whether I’m kidding or not. Or maybe he’s never read the book. I can’t decide which.

“Look Tiferet,” he explains, parking the car in the mall, “as your best friend, and what some might consider a fashion guru, I can’t allow you to walk around Tel Aviv looking the way you do. It’s sacrilegious!”

I didn’t even know he believed in God.

So I had to ask myself the hard question: Is acting a full time job? Do I have to look my best all the time, even if it means I won’t necessarily be feeling my best?

To Jim, the answer is clear. An hour later I am “resplendent” (his word) in my new clothes and accessories. The only hang-up seems to be my feet. I’m petite in most ways but I’ve inherited my father’s feet. Who made up the rule that women’s feet have to be small? (Probably one of those Chinese geisha’s with their dainty tied-up feet during the Ming Dynasty.) But this saleswoman is determined to cut off my circulation. She’s trying to stuff my size 10 foot into a size 7 shoe – and succeeding. The 5 inch heels mean I am also in a ballet position hanging on to Jim for dear life. 

“Ouch! It’s pinching everywhere!” I whine.

“Don’t we women have to put up with a lot?” the saleswoman confides, handing me the empty shoebox.

“Tiferet!” Jim commands, steadying me, “Stop complaining and walk in them a little.”

“This can’t be safe, walking on these pointy sticks like this… I’m gonna’ break my ankle,” I pout, staggering along the store hallway.

“Occupational hazard,” Jim says dryly.

“They hurt!

“No pain no stardom,” he mumbles. “You’re walking like a drunk. Chin up, eyes straight ahead, shoulders back,” he orders.

“Stop giving me runway instructions!”

“Eyes forward!” He demands, following me in his comfortable loafers. “You’ll get used to them in no time, every woman wears them.”

I pause in front of a mirror, not recognizing the woman in the reflection. The tight fitting dress and high heels are bad enough, but Jim has me made up so that I barely recognize myself. I feel like I’m in character, and ready to role.

I pull down the dangerously short dress Jim has chosen for me.

“You look sexy!” Jim drools. It’s times like this I wish Jim was as gay as the impression he actually gives.

“Look at my face!” I implore, rubbing at the uncomfortable makeup. “I feel like I a four-year-old just magic-markered all over it! And this jacket feels like a girdle. I can barely breath. And these Cruella Devile shoes are for the toeless. I’m falling all over the place. If we ever get to the party our host better not have anything expensive lying around.

“And why do I feel like I have to rush forward all the time,” I complain, suddenly feeling sorry for my one year old niece just learning to walk. Why isn’t anyone “ooing” and “ahhhing” me as I take my first steps?

“You just have to practice” Jim advises, “Walk in them an hour a day.”

We buy the shoes – I could never have pried them off anyway.

At the party, all heads turn as I clickity click through the door and onto the Italian marble floor. I keep myself from shouting “Bolero!” but I get the distinct feeling some of the people are asking themselves “What the hell is she made up for?”

But Jim’s right. People notice me. And I get cards with those star-studded words, “Call me” scribbled on the back, with both home and cell numbers.  And there were some directors (2) and producers (1) at the party, and to be honest, one casting director seemed really interested in me (hopefully for my acting potential).

I left early, because of the pain. Crossing the street, my heel got stuck in a crack and I careened forward into the street, barely missing a car, and visa versa. The driver yelled a quick “Shikor!” (Drunk!) and kept driving. But the good thing was that it took me half the time to walk home because I was in perpetual forward motion.

As a victim of the beauty-on-demand era, I feel obligated to pose the question: Are we paying too high a price for what we’re after?

Obviously, in every profession there are sacrifices to be made to get where you want: doctors study seven years or more just to be able to practice; lawyers have to work 18 hour days; and psychologist – well, psychologists have to sacrifice their sanity so they can identify with the insane. 

But none of those professionals have to do it in heels!

In an industry where how you look means more than how you act, and the years of hard work you spent polishing your craft are second to the clothes you wear – how do you know where to draw the line?

It would be one thing if only the actors suffered, but millions of people gaze expectantly at celebrities, copying their every clothing move. We set styles, but do we set a good example?

And between our hair extensions, three-inch makeup, nips and tucks, girdles and high heels – how can any married man (or woman) know who they’re REALLY getting?

Think of the wasted hours spent by women (and more and more men) putting their faces, stomachs and buttocks together each morning. Think of the obsession young people have with being young because their idols never seem to age. Think of the divorce rates that continue to soar because the ratio of how a woman looks when she goes to bed compared to how she looks when she wakes up is 1 (year) to 20 (years)—after only 1 year of marriage!

Would Rodan’s “The Thinker” been have as thoughtful if he’d had Botox injected into him every day? 

I’m still trying to figure out where my red lines are – when I should sacrifice comfort for appearance.

Ah, well…It’s time for me to go practice my heel walking now. But from my pigeon-toed, fifth position, five inch altitude, I’ll be wondering:

When exactly, is the price for beauty too HIGH?

HEEL THE WORLD Read More »

JWW in Congo: It’s Not Academic Anymore

Posted by Naama Haviv

I knew I shouldn’t have gone into the room about children long before I stepped inside. It’s the last room of the Kigali Genocide Memorial Center here in Rwanda, and it’s not like the kind young man that greeted us at reception didn’t give me fair warning that it was coming. I was already in tears – the memorial is intensely powerful and personal – and I knew it would push me over the edge.

18 Diverse L.A. rabbis traveled to Israel to show solidarity

Click here for to read the

List of Los Angeles area rabbis on the Unity Mission:

  • Rabbi Daniel Bouskila, Sephardic Temple Tifereth Israel
  • Rabbi Sharon Brous, IKAR
  • Rabbi Kenneth Chasen, Leo Baeck Temple
  • Rabbi Mark Diamond, Board of Rabbis
  • Rabbi Denise Eger, Congregation Kol Ami
  • Rabbi Morley Feinstein, University Synagogue
  • Rabbi Laura Geller, Temple Emanuel
  • Rabbi Donald Goor, Temple Judea
  • Rabbi Eli Herscher, Stephen S. Wise Temple
  • Rabbi Marvin Hier, Simon Wiesenthal Center
  • Rabbi Isaac Jeret, Congregation Ner Tamid
  • Rabbi Yosef Kanefsky, B’nai David-Judea
  • Rabbi Adam Kligfeld, Temple Beth Am
  • Rabbi Elazar Muskin, Young Israel of Century City
  • Rabbi Kalman Topp, Temple Beth Jacob
  • Rabbi Stewart Vogel, Temple Aliyah
  • Rabbi Robert Wexler, American Jewish University
  • Rabbi David Wolpe, Sinai Temple

Rabbi Eli Herscher, senior rabbi of Stephen S. Wise Temple, echoed that sentiment. “We know that official recognition and dialogue among the movements are rather rare here in Israel, which is unfortunate. The idea of this trip is to show a model with rabbis from Los Angeles who can in fact sit down together and talk about anything, possibly disagree on issues of importance to them, and yet when it comes to a passion for Israel and the centrality of Israel to the Jewish people, can put aside those differences. It’s a trip about leading by example,” Herscher said.

Rabbi Elazar Muskin of the Modern Orthodox Young Israel of Century City pointed out the dramatic need for such unity right now, due to the delegitimization of Israel both inside and outside the Jewish community. To support his point he cited a recent study by professors Steven M. Cohen and Ari Y. Kelman, which reported that 50 percent of American Jews below the age of 35 believe would not be a tragedy in their life if Israel disappeared.

“The worst delegitimization of Israel is happening within our own community,” Muskin said. “We wanted to reignite the passion and reinstate a sense of unity. Let the citizens of Israel fight the politics. We have to back the state.” Muskin related Jews in the Diaspora to parents who should unconditionally love their children despite not always sanctioning their actions. “There is an unconditional love for the state of Israel that unites all of us.”

As the first Israeli consul general in Los Angeles to reach out in such a personal way to the rabbinate, Dayan served such an integral part of the mission that at the final meal together Rabbi Mark Diamond, executive vice president of the Board of Rabbis of Southern California, announced that a $1,000 scholarship will be given in his honor to the Ayalim project in the Negev. Called the New Zionist movement, the Ayalim initiative provides young students opportunities to settle in Israel’s peripheral areas, such as the Galilee and the Negev. In exchange for housing and academic scholarships, the youth volunteer with disadvantaged children from nearby communities and lead educational and social activities. Every year, over 5,000 youth apply for the 500 available positions.

For more than a year prior to the trip, Dayan worked on the packed itinerary designed to expose contemporary social problems regarding foreign workers and hunger as well as introducing the New Zionism and current advancements in technology. During the visit the delegation met well-known author and journalist Meir Shalev, professor Ruth Gavison of the Israel Democracy Institute, President Shimon Peres, Ben-Gurion University President Rivka Carmi, Yeruham Mayor Amram Mitzna, professor Eilon Adar of the Zuckerberg Institute for Water Research and a host of other top Israeli professors and intellectuals.

There were moments of tension, but they were brief, and many mentioned that their favorite moments came in the discussions on the bus, when they got a chance to know their colleagues better and hear other perspectives. Together they peeled potatoes and served warm meals side by side at the Hazon Yeshaya soup kitchen in Jerusalem, where thousands of needy Jewish and Arab citizens are fed every day. They toured the Ayalim project in the Negev to hear about the new pioneers. They were inspired by the sharp mind and inspiring advice of Peres, who at 86 is still looking forward and asking for patience.

Many noted the emotion evoked on their visit to Rabin Square where, over the noisy din of bus engines, whining mopeds and boisterous pedestrians on Ibn Gvirol Street, Dalia Rabin-Pelossof (Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin’s daughter) informed the group that on this very spot nearly 14 years ago to the day her father walked down the steps and was shot by a Jewish religious fanatic who disagreed with the Oslo accords. She explained that the pieces of cracked stones illuminated by a fiery orange light symbolize the earthquake that his assassination caused both for the Israeli people and for the peace process.

“And the earth is still shaking,” added one of the rabbis. Indeed, before coming to Rabin Square to lay a flower wreath, the delegation had already confronted one of the most contentious social problems making headlines in recent weeks — Interior Minister Eli Yishai’s demand for the deportation of illegal foreign workers’ children, many of whom were born in Israel, speak Hebrew fluently and have no connection to their homelands. At the Bialik-Rogozin School in south Tel Aviv, where some of the approximately 1,200 children study, a well-spoken but shy 10-year-old Filipino boy asked the rabbis to pray that he won’t be sent away.

For many of the rabbis, this was a chance to see firsthand some of the difficult issues concerning policymakers in Israel today.

All of the rabbis had previously visited Israel multiple times, and many of them have lived here for extended periods of time; nevertheless Dayan succeeded in showing them new perspectives on a land they already know well, they said.

“This is not Paul Newman emerging from the water,” said Rabbi Morley Feinstein of University Synagogue at the end of the trip, referring to the film “Exodus.” “This is the real place, where there are issues of hunger, poverty and pain.”

Rabbi Laura Geller of Temple Emanuel of Beverly Hills agreed. “This isn’t Disneyland, and it’s a mistake for us to pretend that it is,” she added. “American Jews need to understand that just as they wrestle with God, they can wrestle with the truth of this country and its challenges.”

Bouskila said he had been hesitant to come here as a tourist. But by the end of the journey, he appreciated the perspective others had gained. “I’m pleased that we got an insider view of the hard issues about immigration and that we heard from some intellectuals,” he said. “It gave a view beyond the Arab-Israeli conflict, AIPAC, Iran and settlements, and I think these American rabbis will leave with a new appreciation for this country.”

For Geller, who was the first woman to lead a major metropolitan-area synagogue and serves as a strong advocate for racial and cultural harmony, one of the more poignant moments occurred outside of the Yad Vashem museum in Jerusalem. A local Israeli observing the passing group commented in Hebrew that a woman is not allowed to wear a kippah. “One of the male rabbis, and it could have been any one of them, turned to the woman and replied, also in Hebrew, ‘Lamma lo? Why not?’” Geller recounted.

Another memorable moment occurred during the meeting with President Peres. As Peres greeted Eger, he was confused about her title. “What does one call a female rabbi? A rabbinson?” he asked politely. It led to a barrage of questions about how many female rabbis there are in Los Angeles and in the United States, and Eger was pleased and flattered by his curiosity and interest in the subject.

Much discussion of how to negotiate public prayer in a mixed-gender group preceded their arrival at the Kotel, where women are divided from men. Yet the moment was anti-climactic. For Geller, the Western Wall is a sacred place full of history and conflict, and yet it remains problematic as a symbol of the politicization of religion. In order to avoid conflict, the group decided that each individual should follow his or her own course. For the Orthodox rabbis, that meant heading down to the actual wall, but the majority of the group remained together. They stood high above the dividing partition facing the rugged wall and stayed together for a quiet and unassuming prayer. Like beacons of hope for peaceful co-existence, two mosques with neon green lights illuminated the space behind the hallowed wall.

Afterward, as they walked through the cobblestone streets of Jerusalem’s Old City to the Sephardic Education Center (Bouskila’s synagogue’s extension here), Dayan looked pleased. His first measure of success, to put the team together, had been accomplished at home. But his second measure, to receive local media coverage, had been highly uncertain. Two short television pieces were aired and articles appeared in the Jerusalem Post and Yediot Aharonot and on Internet news sites Ynet and Walla. The group gave eight live radio interviews during their visit, and their trip was later covered by the Los Angeles Times.

“For me, this means the message got across,” Dayan said. “Now we need to look forward to how we can harness this power and influence and build on it. My hope is that other cities will imitate this initiative.”

At the Sephardic Education Center, jovial dancers in a local wedding were just beginning to kick up their heels to the upbeat tunes of a live klezmer band. A banquet hall below had been prepared especially for the delegation, and glasses of red wine were raised in toasts to the rabbis and Dayan. During the meal, each rabbi shared thoughts on upcoming sermons stemming from the trip, including everything from new perspectives on the Zionist dream to the deep bonds that had been formed on this trip. For some, the emphasis would be on the centrality of Israel. For others, the importance of dialogue back home. Herscher reminded the group to leave feeling challenged rather than too certain of unity.

“We didn’t come to strengthen Israel. Israel strengthened us,” Hier said.

Added Vogel: “We came to give a message to Israel, and we are taking a different message home about the Zionist dream and the passion of the faculty.

“We are leaving with a renewed sense of optimism and hope, with a recommitment to Israel.”

For more information about the Rabbis Unity Mission and the Consulate’s other activities, visit: “>Find more photos like this on EveryJew.com

18 Diverse L.A. rabbis traveled to Israel to show solidarity Read More »