fbpx

October 21, 2009

Israeli doctors disinvited from Egypt confab

An invitation for Israeli doctors to attend a breast cancer awareness conference in Egypt was rescinded.

Israeli doctors planning to attend this week’s conference sponsored by the breast cancer advocacy group Susan G. Komen for the Cure, which includes meetings with cancer researchers from the United States and several countries in the Middle East, were told at the last minute that they were no longer invited to the conference by order of Egypt’s health minister.

The Israeli doctors already had received security clearance from Egypt to attend, according to reports.

The Anti-Defamation League on Monday called on the advocacy group to ensure that Israeli breast cancer researchers be permitted to participate in the program in Egypt, which begins Wednesday.

“We find this last minute exclusion of Israeli experts shocking and contrary to the stated purpose of these programs—to promote regional cooperation to highlight breast cancer awareness, research and best treatment practices—and inimical to the ideals and goals of your organization,” Abraham Foxman, ADL’s national director, said in a letter to Hala Moddelmog, president and CEO of Susan G. Komen for the Cure.

According to a notice on the advocacy group’s Web site, representatives of 10 Middle East nations are scheduled to participate in the conference, which the group says is being undertaken with “unprecedented cooperation aimed at elevating awareness of breast cancer in the region and beyond.”

The conference is being held under the auspices of Egypt’s first lady, Suzanne Mubarak, and supported by the Suzanne Mubarak Women’s International Peace Movement, the Egyptian Ministry of Health and the United States Agency for International Development, with assistance from the Institute of International Education and the Johns Hopkins University Center for Communication Programs.

Israeli doctors disinvited from Egypt confab Read More »

We Are All Baha’is

Are we our brother’s and sister’s keepers? Last week I joined a group of distinguished community leaders in a resounding affirmative response to this timeless question. We gathered together at the University of Southern California in “Belief Behind Bars: A Call for Human Rights and Religious Freedom in Iran,” co-sponsored by the USC Office of Religious Life, the Levan Institute for Humanities and Ethics, and the Los Angeles Baha’i Center. We were a large assemblage of faith leaders and celebrities, musicians and dancers, human rights activists and university officials, faculty and students. 

Our honored guests in absentia were seven Baha’i leaders currently being held in a prison in Tehran, Iran. They are awaiting trial on trumped-up charges of “insulting religious sanctities,” “propaganda against the Islamic Republic,” “espionage for Israel” and “spreading corruption on earth.” In Iran, the last two charges are punishable by death.

The false imprisonment of these seven men and women is the latest and most egregious step in Iran’s sordid history of persecuting members of the Baha’i faith and seeking to destroy the Baha’i community. In the early years of the Islamic Revolution, some 200 Baha’is were murdered and more than 1,000 were thrown into prison because of their religious beliefs. It is ironic that Iran does not recognize the Baha’i faith as a minority religion, since Persia is the birthplace of this noble faith tradition. It is tragic that the 300,000 Iranian Baha’is suffer state-sanctioned discrimination and persecution. It is ominous that human rights observers have documented a dramatic increase in acts of persecution and hatred directed at Iran’s Baha’i community in recent years.

The program at USC featured an array of speeches, musical performances and video presentations highlighting the plight of the Baha’i community in Iran. Actor Rainn Wilson hosted the event and quickly moved beyond humor to set a serious tone for the evening. The cast of performers and presenters included jazz musicians Alfredo Rodriguez and Tierney Sutton, noted composers JB Eckl and K.C. Porter, “American Idol” star Kai Kalama and a video appearance by Oscar-nominee and Emmy-winning actress Shohreh Aghdashloo.

There were few dry eyes in Bovard Auditorium when seven talented young children dramatized the stories of the seven men and women in Tehran’s Evin prison. The prisoners include Jamaloddin Khanjani, 76, a factory owner who lost his business because of his religious beliefs; Behrouz Tavakkoli, 58, a psychologist and social worker who was jailed for four months without charge due to his faith; and Fariba Kamalabadi, 47, a developmental psychologist who has been arrested three times because of her volunteer work in the Baha’i community. They languish in jail cells in Tehran along with Afif Naemi, 48; Vahid Tizfahm, 36; Mahvash Sabet, 56; and Saeid Rezaie, 52. They are two women and five men — hard-working, highly educated Iranian citizens, loving husbands and wives, parents and grandparents, children and siblings — whose only “crime” is their steadfast devotion to the teachings and practices of the Baha’i faith.

Anyone who has studied the Baha’i religion understands its core teachings of world peace and perfect unity. Anyone who has met Baha’i followers appreciates their gentle demeanor and heartfelt commitment to harmony and reconciliation between individuals and nations. The Baha’i leaders I work with share my passion for interfaith discourse between people of diverse faiths and backgrounds. In a profound sense, we are all Baha’is.

When I took my turn at the podium, I expressed the Jewish community’s solidarity and support of the imprisoned Baha’i leaders. While we are here in Southern California, our hearts are 7,500 miles to the east in Tehran. Our words and actions strengthen and sustain these seven brave individuals during their lonely days and nights in prison.

As Jews, we bear witness to the tragic horrors of the Shoah and the vile anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial of Iran’s president. We of all peoples understand the grim implications of the Iranian government’s secret 1991 memorandum regarding “The Baha’i Question.” We recognize that an assault upon the Baha’i community is an assault upon all of us.

We are indeed our brother’s and sister’s keepers. When we light Shabbat and holiday candles, let’s remember the seven Baha’i leaders in our prayers. Let’s work together to bring these courageous freedom fighters from darkness to light.

Rabbi Mark S. Diamond is the executive vice president of The Board of Rabbis of Southern California.

For more information on the persecution of the Baha’i community in Iran, visit http://iran.bahai.us or www.iranpresswatch.org.

We Are All Baha’is Read More »

A National Conversation on the American Jewish Future

A new level of uneasiness now dominates our general society and, more directly, the Jewish community. We are living in one of the most transformative moments in history, resulting in the reshaping of the human condition, where the global enterprise is undergoing a major technology and communications revolution, the reconfiguration of political power, the creation of a world economic order, and a significant generational shift in cultural attitudes and social behaviors and norms.

Throughout Jewish history, at moments of great social upheaval and religious transitions, Jews would communicate with their co-religionists in order to redefine their status. Community leaders would come together to assess their political and religious concerns and define ways in which the communal enterprise ought to engage the larger civic society as well as address internal priorities. 

Such a national Jewish conversation is needed at this time. Major international challenges and domestic concerns set the framework for such consultation of Jewish leadership. At this time world Jewry must deal with the growth of international terrorism, the re-emergence of European anti-Semitism and a growing focus on anti-Israel activism across the globe, in addition to the military threats posed by Iran directed against Israel and Western interests. On the domestic side, a number of factors are contributing to the remaking of the American Jewry. As a result of the current economic climate, Jewish institutions are experiencing significant fiscal and operational challenges, leading in some cases to major restructuring of primary programs and services and in other settings, the actual closing of organizations. In addition, high rates of assimilation and intermarriage along with changing generational affiliation and identity patterns will result in a fundamentally different ethnic and social composite of Jews within society. This can best be reflected in the demographic issues facing Jewish Americans, as portrayed by lower participation and membership rates, a significantly aging population, and a growing cultural and religious disconnect between younger Jews and prior generations.

Critics of the American Jewish scene, while acknowledging the creativity and growth among some sectors of Jewish life, bemoan the failure of the centerpiece of the communal and religious world to demonstrate the same type of innovation and structural dynamism. To the contrary, as the creative Jewish edge pursues its particularistic interests, the core seems to be imploding as downsizing and institutional malaise reflect the storyline of some of our most potent organizational systems. Such a national conversation is long overdue among American Jewish leaders, as it would come at a time when the communal enterprise seems unclear with regard to its mandate as well as deeply divided along political and ideological lines.

The last time American Jewry came together for such a gathering occurred in 1943, when the American Jewish Conference mobilized the community to advocate for a Jewish state in Palestine. Earlier gatherings, for example, led to the creation of the Reform movement in the 1870s and fostered the mobilization of an American Jewish response following the end of World War I. As in the past, some institutional leaders elected not to participate in such discussions, fearing the loss of their identity and arguing against the notion that any one group or combination of organizational voices might speak for or represent American Jewry. Yet, regularly throughout the 20th century, significant numbers of American Jewish institutions did convene to tackle shared international concerns related to such matters as Israel and Soviet Jewry.

While no institutional body has the authority to legislate social or structural change, a thoughtful and essential summit of Jewish leadership would seem to be both appropriate and necessary. Participation and engagement must be seen as a responsibility that transcends institutional boundaries, ideological and religious positions, and political passions. The federation system and synagogue umbrella structures must join national agencies in convening such a Jewish dialogue.

Similar convocations should also take place within our local communities, allowing leaders to re-imagine ways in which institutions might work in collaboration, while identifying unmet needs, shared concerns and common action. Both on the national scene and within our local settings, such conversations can lead to the re-imagination of American Judaism and the Jewish communal system of governance, leadership, financial planning and collaboration.

Beyond this national dialogue, a global conference should be convened to address the threatening international challenges facing the Jewish people and, more directly, the Jewish state. With multiple voices expressing themselves on issues related to Diaspora-Israel matters, such a gathering would allow for the articulation of shared values, common principles of action and the implementation of specific action points.

Further, a consultation on the status of Jewish leadership ought to bring together key educational resources and operational players in order to examine how as a community we will recruit and train our professional leadership. Similarly, what steps are we willing to take as a community to also “invest” in building a new generation of lay leaders? The question of leadership represents a crucial and essential institutional challenge and may ultimately define the success and viability of 21st century Judaism.

Establishing a think tank on behalf of American Jewry would seem to be one of several possible outcomes — just as American business is currently examining consumer trends, so must our community invest in a major research and planning structure.

In the end, for such a national dialogue to be successful, institutional leaders must step away from historical organizational rivalries, personal ego trips and set operational assumptions. The focus for such discussions must be on finding common ground and a renewed sense of communal purpose.

While these prior convocations were directed toward specific outcomes, this national conversation must address myriad challenges now confronting American Judaism and its communal network of institutions and services. Such a dialogue can lead to the re-imagination of American Judaism and a serious conversation on the future of the Jewish communal system of governance, leadership and financial viability. There are few occasions in history when a community has the opportunity to shape and define its future; this may be one of those transformational moments for American Jewry.

Steven Windmueller is dean of the Los Angeles campus of Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion and the Rabbi Alfred Gottschalk Chair in Jewish Communal Service.

A National Conversation on the American Jewish Future Read More »

Holocaust Man

I’ve always had a weird feeling about the whole notion of Holocaust studies. I mean, 6 million Jews were murdered — how much more do I need to know? I can read 100 books on the subject — analyzing the who, what, where, why and how of this unspeakable atrocity — and still, I don’t think anything I read will come close to equaling these five words: Six million Jews were murdered.

I don’t need more knowledge to make me rise up and say, “Never again!” Or to understand that the best way I can honor the 6 million dead is to proudly live out my Judaism.

It’s true, of course, that academia works differently. It lives to question, dissect, dig, analyze and understand. But it’s also possible that a subject can be so emotionally overwhelming that it can get dehumanized and trivialized if it doesn’t receive special treatment — even in academia.

The Holocaust might be such a subject.

It’s with such thoughts swirling in my mind that I had lunch at Pat’s the other day with professor Michael Berenbaum of American Jewish University.

Berenbaum is one of the premier scholars of the Holocaust, having written or edited more than 15 books on the subject, produced or consulted on several award-winning films, overseen the design and building of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D. C., and served as head of the Survivors of the Shoah Visual History Foundation. As if that weren’t enough, he was also the driving force behind the latest edition of the Encyclopaedia Judaica.

Unless you want to feel guilty about leading an unproductive life, do not Google him.

Berenbaum, who’s in his early 60s and looks like he could have been a junior-weight boxer, is a tough nut to crack. One of his former students at Georgetown University, the entertainer Pearl Bailey, wrote of him: “He is young, aggressive, tough, wise as some sages of yore, and as brilliant as a diamond. When class ended, you felt filled, drained, and filled again.”

After a long lunch with him, I felt filled and drained, but also wanting. I tried several times to tease a personal anecdote out of him that might explain his relentless drive and passion, but failed. He gave me long, articulate answers, but nothing, I sensed, that he hadn’t said many times before.

Thankfully, we had a follow-up meeting at the Coffee Bean, where his tough-guy image cracked a little. Under a hot sun, he showed some raw emotion as he spoke about one of the major turning points of his life: his decision to skip his college graduation ceremony in June 1967, and, with a few friends, fly to Israel at the start of the Six-Day War.

“We are going to drive the Jews into the sea,” he remembers hearing from Israel’s enemies.

He didn’t get to fight in the war, but he volunteered and did whatever he could, including collecting garbage. He remembers that the war was “so close to everything” that a soldier, living at the same place in Jerusalem as Berenbaum, would come home for a quick shower and then go back to fight.

When he got back to America, Berenbaum’s academic interests changed. A graduate student of philosophy at the time, he became consumed by theological and historical questions around the idea of God and evil in history, as well as by the ability of a people to prevail against all odds.

But his ’67 experience had done more than redirect his intellectual passions. It gave him a primal rush, a sense that he was on the street, “living history.” Since that time, he has felt a constant pull between the life of letters and the world of action — between writing scholarly volumes and being an activist for causes like Soviet Jewry; between researching the Holocaust and building a memorial to it.

Berenbaum’s great challenge has been to marry these two sensibilities in his work. It’s clear when you talk to him that he feeds off both, that he needs and values both.

Maybe that’s why he wasn’t defensive when we spoke about the potential trivialization of the Holocaust. He believes the field of Holocaust studies will be a rich and evolving one for many years to come, but his motto, as he quotes a colleague, has always been: “Handle with care.”

One way he exhibits this care is by reconciling what may be the defining paradox of the Holocaust for Jewish people: Can we be victims and still be strong? For Berenbaum, the answer is subtle — and clear.

Yes, he says, Jews were tragic victims, and in many ways, we still are. But we are also strong. The two are not mutually exclusive. We can spend decades and millions of words to mourn and analyze the horror that fell upon us, but we can also move forward with the power and immediacy of a few words.

For this hard-nosed scholar who blew off his graduation to join a war, those few words go beyond “Never Again.”

They’re closer to, “We’ll Never Give Up.”

Holocaust Man Read More »

LETTERS: October 23-29, 2009

Kudos to Jon Voight

Three cheers to Jon Voight (Letters, Oct. 16) for his reflections on the demonizing of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin by Marty Kaplan (“I Want to Know What Happens Next,” Sep. 25). Voight has always been one of the most moral and decent people coming out of Hollywood. He has volunteered his time and efforts on behalf of causes beneficial to Jews and others for years, especially the time he graciously volunteers to Chabad. Kaplan should look into his own leftist nest to find people who actually despise Israel; it wouldn’t take him that long. You will find that many Republicans, such as Sarah Palin and former President Bush, are some of the best friends that Israel will ever have.

Richard Levine
via e-mail

Thank you, Jon Voight, for your great letter. We Jews should be embarrassed that it took a non-Jew to stand up for Israel. We should be ashamed that a fellow Jew, Marty Kaplan, had the audacity to put Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who calls for wiping Israel out and is building nukes to do this, together with Israel’s friend and supporter, Sarah Palin. Kaplan’s statement provides Ahmadinejad with legitimacy to proceed with our destruction. It blurs the difference between good and evil, and breeds reports like Richard Goldstone’s. The world sees that we Jews cannot distinguish terrorists from friends, Hamas from those who gave their lives protecting Israel, and destroyers from our allies and friends. They start wondering if there really is a difference.

The problem is not that one man was bad. The problem is that we Jews fail to rise against him. On behalf of many colleagues, we demand that Kaplan makes an immediate and complete apology to Palin, in a visible location in The Journal. Should he choose not to, his column must be eradicated from The Jewish Journal. We have no interest in continuing to receive an Israel-bashing Jewish Journal just like we have no interest in subscribing to Al Jazeera.

Thank you, Mr. Voight, for the wake-up call.

Henry Kister
Corona Del Mar

I want to thank The Jewish Journal for printing Jon Voight’s letter.

Isn’t it puzzling that some of Israel’s (and the Jewish people’s) most ardent and sincerest supporters are individuals like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, former President Bush, and many other conservatives. This is in contrast to many of your columnists and those ridiculous rabbis on the Westside who fasted (or whatever) for Gaza.

And thank you, Mr. Voight, from one who contributed to that Chasidic group because of you.

Mark Steinberg
Los Angeles

Right on, Jon Voight. You told it better than I or anyone else could have. How about The Journal replacing Marty Kaplan with Jon Voight? Finally we would get a columnist (a non-Jew) who writes positive things about Israel and condemns those who wish harm on her. And he would never ever compare a Democrat with Ahmadinejad.

John Gable
via e-mail

Marty Kaplan owes the community an explanation of his juxtaposition of Sarah Palin and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. I find his juxtaposition incomprehensible.

I think that Jon Voight’s letter missed the point. Sarah Palin should not be compared to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad regardless of whether or not she is a “beautiful human being.” I am a lifelong Democrat. But does that mean I should demonize Republicans?

Amiel Shulsinger
via e-mail

You wasted a good chunk of your Letters page on poor Jon Voight’s latest far-far-right “pro-Israel” Jeremiad about a few lines in Marty Kaplan’s perfectly reasonable article about Israel and the Days of Awe.

Voight’s disjointed rant would be hilarious if it weren’t so pathetic — especially the encomium about his adored Alaskan aerial wolf-cub hunter-cum-energy “expert.”

Sara Meric
via e-mail

Marty Kaplan Responds:

I wish I’d been clearer: Sarah Palin and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are both stories-in-progress. That’s the only sense in which I’m comparing them. Different people, different stories, but both unfinished narratives. It would be nuts to say the two of them should meet similar destinies. I may have written a regrettably ambiguous sentence, but I’m not daft.


Protest Obama

Why Do Jews of the World Diddle While Israel Stands Alone?

Neither Steven L. Spiegel nor President Barack Obama have come to grips with Israel’s survival (“Israel Has a Strong, Effective Ally in Obama,” Oct. 9). Lloyd Greif did (“Israel Stands Alone”), but the issue must be seen as almost entirely moral whether it’s a matter of priority, size of claim, right to exist, etc., except for what Israel must do to defend herself and what the United States can do to help. The Palestinian question is moot, irrelevant, a distraction and gets in the way. The moral and practical problem is up to the Jews of the United States, the world and their friends. But presently we act as if the matter was beyond our capacity to influence and we do nothing. Wrong! Unless we get active we may end up with two Holocausts on our conscience shortly, one in the 20th century and the other in the 21st century … unless we get active. So, let’s dump the lefty JNothings and start raising holy hell as Jews, of all political parties, with gigantic meetings in downtown New York, Washington, Chicago and Los Angeles every weekend from now on till the matter is settled to our satisfaction. We must stop all action in the city and speak loud enough for the world to hear, and maybe Obama, too. Target Iran and Obama. We can win if we get into our cars Saturday and Sunday and drive downtown. Youth must lead. Signs, loud speakers, etc. Music! Nothing moves. Obama and mayors can’t put us all in jail. The emphasis must be getting Obama to say: America backs Israel all the way, now and from now on. We the demonstrators are what’s important, not Obama.

Jerry Green
Los Angeles


Threats to U.S., Israel

During the past few months, I have come to the conclusion that the four organizations that pose the greatest threat to the security and well being of both the United States and of Israel are (in no particular order of degree of threat), Al Qaeda, the Taliban, the United Nations and the current administration-led Democratic Party.

We know all about Al Qaeda and the Taliban, and the United Nations is nothing more than a lackey and disguised spokesman for radical Islam and its hatred and jealousy towards Israel. As to the current administration, when are the majority of Americans going to realize that the emperor (president) wears no clothes?

Michael Gesas
Beverly Hills


Veal Equals Suffering

Last month you published in the food section how to eat veal (“Home for Rosh Hashanah With Chef Todd Aarons,” Sept. 18). Yes, your magazine published how to cook up a baby calf that was ripped from its mother, terrified and crying and then confined in a dark filthy factory farm in a crate so that it couldn’t even turn around. Then it was fed only a diet of watery substance so that it becomes anemic, and then it laid there in its own diarrhea for six months until it was dragged out from its prison cell, released from its neck chain and then violently slaughtered. Then you advertised how to cook it up in your magazine. Yum… Yum.

Question, Mr. Eshman: What did this baby do to deserve this horror and cruelty? Why do you advise to your readers to buy its sad little flesh and eat it with such relish?

The treatment of this baby calf reminds me of how the Jews were treated during the Holocaust. Remember that horror? I’m sure that you do and maybe you could apologize for doing another sentient and important being of God’s creation the exact same thing that was done to the Jews. How soon we forget and become hypocrites.

Carolyn Doswell
Studio City


CORRECTION
In the article “L.A. Jews Join Fast for Gaza” (Sept. 25), Rabbi Haim Beliak was erroneously connected with Beth Shalom of Whittier. He is the co-director of JewsOnFirst.org, an Internet site focused on the Jewish stake in protecting the First Amendment.


THE JEWISH JOURNAL welcomes letters from all readers. Letters should be no more than 200 words and must include a valid name, address and phone number. Letters sent via e-mail must not contain attachments. Pseudonyms and initials will not be used, but names will be withheld on request. We reserve the right to edit all letters. Mail: The Jewish Journal, Letters, 3580 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1510, Los Angeles, CA 90010; e-mail: {encode=”letters@jewishjournal.com” title=”letters@jewishjournal.com”}; or fax: (213) 368-1684.

LETTERS: October 23-29, 2009 Read More »

Neda Square

Everybody with a cause, everybody angry at a country eventually ends up in front of the Federal Building on Wilshire Boulevard at Veteran Avenue, waving a poster at passing cars, hoping for a honk. It may not be the most effective form of activism, but at least it tries to reach Angelenos where we live: in our cars.

Over the past nine months, groups supporting democracy in Iran have staged at least 30 protests in front of the Federal Building — and that is just the number of gatherings for which protesters sought official permission. There have been countless smaller, impromptu protests there, spurred by the Islamic Republic’s crackdown on protesters following the disputed results of the June 2009 Iranian presidential election.

The protests grew more fervent after June 20. That’s the day a young woman named Neda Agha-Soltan was driving her Peugeot 206 through Tehran, accompanied by her music teacher and another friend, all on their way to join a peaceful protest. The car grew hot, so the three decided to stop and walk the rest of the way. As Neda was standing near a demonstration, a member of the Iranian security forces took aim with a rifle and shot her in the chest. An amateur video captured the image of Neda slumping to the ground.

Watch the videos on YouTube, as millions of people have. Neda’s last words were, “I’m burning, I’m burning!” She died en route to Tehran’s Shariati hospital. She was 27.

There is a quiet movement underway here to name the intersection at Veteran Avenue and Wilshire Boulevard in Agha-Soltan’s honor — Neda Square.

“She’s the symbol of freedom,” activist Bijan Khalili told me. “Neda has become not only an Iranian name, but an international identity.”

Khalili, a publisher and bookstore owner, has broached the idea informally with the office of City Councilman Paul Koretz, whose Fifth District encompasses the intersection. Another Persian American businessman, Joe Shooshani, has met with Koretz.

“It’s something I’m open to,” Koretz told me by phone last week. He said so far there’s been no major opposition, or major support.

The international community is talking about sanctions to convince the Iranians to halt development of a nuclear bomb. Israel and the United States are pointedly refusing to rule out the possibility of military strikes. Here and around the country, local authorities are weighing divestment and other legal means to pressure the hard-line Iranian government. This past Tuesday, Assemblymen Mike Feuer (D-Los Angeles) and Bob Blumenfield (D-Van Nuys) announced they will introduce legislation prohibiting contracts between the state of California and companies with significant business in Iran’s energy sector. Compared to all these measures, a plaque at a busy intersection doesn’t seem like much.

But it could be an important symbol — and don’t underestimate the power of a good symbol.

“At the centerpiece of political, social and cultural discussions among Iranians,” Shahla Shafiq wrote in her 2002 book, “The New Islamist Man: The Political Prison in Iran,” “is the clash between tradition and modernity, East versus West, democracy and human rights, and equality of men and women.”

Neda Agha-Soltan — a young woman, a good daughter, a protestor, a musician who performed in Teheran’s underground music scene — personified that clash. Her very existence, let alone her protest, was a direct challenge to a soul-crushing regime. 

In a linked-in, digital age, far-away actions resonate. Iranians in the streets of Tehran suffer the blows and bullets, but they will know they are not alone, and the clerics and petty rulers who sanction such repression will know they are being watched.

Bijan Khalili and Joe Shooshani are Jewish, but they say Iran’s current hostility toward Israel and the threat its pursuit of nuclear weapons poses are not what drives them.

“Neda was not Jewish,” Khalili said. “She wasn’t killed by the Republican Guard because she was demonstrating against nuclear weapons, or for Israel, but because she was demonstrating against President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Muslims and Christians and Jews are standing on the corner at Wilshire and Veteran because the Islamic Republic is in violation of human rights — that’s the first thing.”

One aspect of the support for Neda Square that should move local politicians is the fact that the protests have brought together Angelenos of all religious and political stripes for a larger cause, one that crosses all religious and national boundaries, one that the soldiers buried in Los Angeles National Cemetery across from the Federal Building fought and died for, one that transcends politics and transcends time: liberty.

“There seems to be a lot of unity and cooperation in the community on this,” Koretz said.

Next week we will mark the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. Things change, walls crumble, regimes fall — but more often than not they need a push.

Bijan Khalili believes that dedicating a busy Los Angeles intersection to the memory of one young woman who died in the name of freedom will inspire others to take up the cause.

“It gives hope to all other communities struggling for human rights as well,” he said. “And it will make the Iranian regime unhappy.”

That’s a good enough reason for me — I’ll see you at Neda Square.

Voice your support, or opposition, by e-mailing {encode=”nedasquare@jewishjournal.com” title=”nedasquare@jewishjournal.com”}.

Neda Square Read More »

May I Too Pray Like a Woman?

One weekend. Two gatherings. Two conversations that, in retrospect, are profoundly linked.

Saturday night, a conversation with a man who is new to Jewish practice, but is firmly committed to observance for the long haul. His Hebrew reading has become pretty fluent, but davening – in particular weekday davening in the minyan – is still a spiritually fruitless experience for him. It’s just rapid-fire streams of words that he does not understand, into which even the linear translation cannot seem to breathe life. Too many words going by way too fast. It can’t help but feel like an obligation to be discharged, rather than a religious opportunity to be enjoyed. He’s going to take a crack at Prayerbook Hebrew the Easy Way, (http://www.ekspublishing.com ), and hopes this will help.

Sunday morning. A conversation with an ebullient grandmother who had recently read and lectured on Dr. Aliza Lavie’s Tefillat Nashim: Jewish Women’s Prayers Throughout the Ages. She gushes with excitement and wonder as she describes the religious creativity and spiritual authenticity of Jewish women’s prayer over the last four centuries. Prayers (“techinot”) that women have written for in the hope of finding a good match, before venturing into the marketplace to engage in commerce, or upon the occasion of their daughter’s first menstruation. How exciting it is, she concludes, that this religious art form has been chronicled, and that is has become revivified among Jewish women today.

Men are stuck. For better and for worse, it is our collective male obligation to follow and to preserve the “matbea”, the structure and formula of classical rabbinic prayer. All of the words, all the time. We do it for the greater goods of historical continuity and the unity of our far-flung people. And with God’s help and with years of effort we come to appreciate the spiritual genius that inheres in the “matbea”.

But we should probably also be looking over our shoulders at what our women have been doing with their less rigidly-structured obligation of daily prayer. Not to replace the “matbea”, but to supplement it. Not just to add even more words, but to add some life. We can even insert our male “techinot” right into the “amida”.

Here’s a quick sample that took me only about 10 minutes to compose: A techina upon coming home from work aggravated.

My God, whose name is Peace. I know that I am blessed to have a job, and I thank You for the gifts You have given me, and the insight which you renew within me daily. Since the days of Adam, our work is by the sweat of our brow, and too often I complete the day’s work feeling stressed or aggravated. Assist me, God, in remembering the words of the Ketubah, through which I promised not only to support and maintain, but also to cherish and honor the wife with whom You have blessed me. Remind me of the joy with which I beheld my children at the moment of their birth, and my commitment to their happiness. Furnish me the with the strength to close a door – even if only for a few hours – on the aggravations of the day, and with the wisdom to recognize who I am with, now that I have walked through the front door of my home.

 

May I Too Pray Like a Woman? Read More »

Langer’s – The best deli in the world?

Langer’s – The best deli in the world? Read More »

Family Farm Time

A couple of days ago, my son found out that strawberries and raspberries do not come from Trader Joe’s, but a farm, in fact.  Well, he knew that, but never really saw it in person until our visit to farmland.

I grabbed my family and we headed out west to the country…that’s right, Moorpark – to Underwood Family Farms (and no, they don’t grow families there).  With a less than one-hour drive outside of Los Angeles (six or seven hours in traffic), we got there.

For a $3 entrance fee per person (during the week), you are welcome to grab a wagon, throw your belongings and your child in it and haul it through the fields.  So we did.
The farm was beautiful and immaculate – and much cheaper and cleaner than the Tree House Social Club indoor playground I went to (see my earlier post).

We were overwhelmed with the amount of things to see and do (we don’t get out much).  Since we were there during their Harvest Festival, which continues until November 1st, there were a variety of pumpkins you could pick and every type of squash you could imagine.

There was also an animal area where you could feed chickens and a play area for kids with tunnels to run through and haystacks to climb.

After my son loaded the wagon with just about every squash and baby pumpkin around and I unloaded it (even though $1 each was a great price, what would I do with $50 worth of squash?), we headed to the strawberry fields.  Did the Beatles have this particular one in mind when they came up their lyrics?  Just wondering.

We had a great time picking the strawberries and loading our empty cartons.  According to Underwood Family Farm rules, we were allowed to sample the fruit as long as we “don’t make a lunch out of it,” but we decided to fill our cartons and pay on our way out.  Apparently the Joneses picking alongside us had a very different definition of what “lunch” actually meant, as they kept sampling and sampling and sampling and sampling, but oddly their carton was empty.

We moved on from strawberry picking to raspberries and filled our cartons.

We pulled our wagon to the exit and had our pickings weighed.  Fifteen dollars for cartons full of strawberries and raspberries, three pumpkins, dried Indian corn, a funky shaped squash that my son really wanted, and loads of fun.  We are definitely going back there soon.  It was a great time had by all and it got my son to eat more fruit…for a little while anyway.

Family Farm Time Read More »

Clippers Conquer Maccabi 108-96 at Staples

Chris Kaman scored 18 points to lead the Clippers in double figures as Los Angeles used its height advantage to defeat Maccabi Electra Tel Aviv 108-96 in an exhibition game Tuesday night at Staples Center.

Kaman, who at 7 feet is taller than any Maccabi player, made 8 of 13 field goals. He scored his team’s first six points in the second half to turn an already comfortable 53-42 halftime lead into a 17-point lead. The Clippers eventually built the lead to as many as 22.

Sebastian Telfair scored 15 points with seven assists for Los Angeles, rookie Blake Griffin scored 13 points and took 10 rebounds, Rasual Butler scored his 12 points in the first half, Eric Gordon scored eight of his 11 points in the first half, Craig Smith scored 11 points off the bench, and Baron Davis added 10 points.

Maccabi had much of the 13,753 in attendance decidedly on its side but had no answer for Kaman and company. Still, Doron Perkins scored a triple-double with 16 points, 12 rebounds and 10 assists, the final assist coming on a 3-pointer by USC graduate David Bluthenthal at the final buzzer.

Chuck Eidson led Maccabi with 18 points. Bluthenthal added 12 points and Andrew Wisniewski scored 11 points.

The game served as a fundraiser for Migdal Ohr, which bills itself as the largest orphanage in the world. Its founder, Rabbi Yitzhak Dovid Grossman, led the crowd in the “Shema” and “Am Yisrael Chai” at halftime.

A moment of silence was observed before the start of the game for Moni Fanan, the former Maccabi manager who was found dead Sunday night after an apparent suicide.

Clippers Conquer Maccabi 108-96 at Staples Read More »