fbpx

October 20, 2009

The Kraft of Movie Music

“If there’s music in a movie,” said Robert Kraft, president of Fox Music, “whether on screen, or underscore, or someone is playing guitar in a scene, I’m involved.”

That includes the decisions concerning music at every level.

“How it’s paid for, is it creatively appropriate to the film, is it legal, is it focused on selling more movie tickets if it can be … basically every musical aspect of a film at Fox is my responsibility,” he said.

Kraft is in his 15th year at the helm of Fox’s music division, longevity that belies his journey from songwriter and performing artist to executive. However, if Kraft has become assured in his professional role, he confided that only recently has he become comfortable in and proud of his Jewish identity.

Kraft grew up in Princeton, N.J. His mother, Eve Kraft, was executive director of the United States Tennis Association, and while he spent summers at the Chase Tennis Center, he stood out at camp for always “being on the piano.”

From fifth grade on, he was in bands. Although he attended prep school at Lawrenceville and college at Harvard, his goal upon graduation in 1976 was to move to Manhattan and become a songwriter.

“I had no idea what I was doing,” he said in retrospect.

Kraft, a fan of “jazzy bohemian pop” started his band, Robert Kraft and The Ivory Coast, in 1978 and was signed the following year by RSO Records, the label founded by Robert Stigwood and most famous for the Bee Gees and “Saturday Night Fever.” Kraft toured the Northeast, playing Radio City Music Hall, not once, but twice, opening for The Manhattan Transfer and America.

Despite those memorable moments, Kraft was learning “how rocky a career as an artist can be.” To wit: Although Kraft’s first record was a critical success, his second was never released because RSO collapsed. His third, on RCA Records, released in 1983, Kraft recalled, “tanked immediately.”

“Teetering on the edge of being out of work,” Kraft received a call from Ken Ehrlich, a TV producer in Los Angeles who wanted to use one of Kraft’s songs, “On the Westside,” in his show, “Fame.”

At the end of the week, Ehrlich (who today produces the Grammys) asked Kraft if he might write a song for the following week’s show. Kraft decided to move to Los Angeles with his wife.

Over the next few years, Kraft’s career evolved unpredictably from writing songs for TV shows (including the theme for “Who’s the Boss?”) to writing songs for and with performers (including 1984’s “Something in Your Heart Has Been Telling Me,” which Bette Midler released on her recent compilation album, “Jackpot,” 24 years later). Being asked to produce songs for Disney’s “The Little Mermaid” led to Kraft producing records and soundtracks.

His first million-selling record came as a result of his friendship with an actor from his bartending days at Café Central in New York, who crashed on Kraft’s couch after coming to Los Angeles to audition for the lead on a TV show. That friend: Bruce Willis; the show: “Moonlighting”; the album: “The Return of Bruno.” Kraft produced the album for Motown Records; it sold 1.2 million copies and featured two Top Ten singles, “Respect Yourself” and “Under the Boardwalk.”

“It sounds fun in retrospect, but with each [project] I went from the highest of highs to ‘I’ll never work again,'” he said.

Kraft continued to vary his music gigs. By his late 30s, he had worked for Quincy Jones, been a film composer (something he never felt comfortable doing), and wrote and composed “Beautiful Maria of My Soul,” the Oscar-nominated song from “The Mambo Kings,” with Arne Glimcher, and had started the Henson Recording Studios for The Jim Henson Company.

One day, out of the blue, Bill Mechanic, then chairman of 20th Century Fox Film division, invited Kraft to lunch and offered him the job of Fox’s music chief. Kraft hesitated. Would taking the job mean he was abandoning being an artist? Would he become, in the words of one of his friends, “a suit”?

Kraft’s mother suggested he try it for two years. Bruce Willis said, “You know all the other things … try this.”

“Who would have known that it would fit me like a glove?” Kraft asked.

Kraft, who has worked on some 300 movies, said, “It took me 10 years to feel reasonably confident.

“There’s no end to my appetite for hearing new music,” he said. Part of his success, he freely admits, is that he has a young, talented staff whose job is to keep him informed about new music and new composers.

On the other hand, the world of movie composers and musicians is small enough that by now there are few people Kraft hasn’t worked with or doesn’t have an opinion about. That, too, is part of the job.

“Quincy Jones once told me that the best producer is the one with the best Rolodex,” Kraft said.

That means knowing the right person to call in any given situation. As an example, Kraft cites calling T-Bone Burnett to ask whether Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon could carry the Johnny Cash biopic “Walk the Line” as singers. When Burnett, after spending a week recording the stars in his living room reported, “They are going to kill this,” Kraft was able to reassure Fox. “If they’d been horrible, it would have been my ass,” Kraft said.

At the same time, over the last few years, Kraft has been on a journey that has made him more at home with his Jewish identity.

Growing up, Kraft was very aware of “the mythic aspect of his forebears” and their reputation as erudite German Jews. His paternal grandmother was Pauline Seligman, part of the wealthy German Jews in New York known as “Our Crowd,” as were his mother’s family, who were Friedmans of Philadelphia. His parents were introduced through German Jewish relatives, and his father proposed the night they met.

His family celebrated Christmas with a well-decorated tree, and there were chocolate bunnies to be had at Easter. Kraft describes his father’s attitude toward Judaism as “very reluctant.” What his father valued, Kraft said, was “access,” which meant successful assimilation and acceptance in WASP society.

A few summers ago, Kraft’s oldest son saw a painting in an Austrian museum by a Jerome Krafft, from 1820, and wondered whether the artist might be a forebear (Krafft was the family name’s original spelling). Kraft was intrigued.

Knowing that his father had been born in Wheeling, W. Va., Kraft Googled “Jews in Wheeling, West Virginia.” He found a site devoted to a synagogue in Wheeling that featured a Kraft reading room. Kraft “had a complete moment of goose bumps” when he discovered the synagogue’s president at the turn of the 20th century was named Samuel Kraft.

The Web site listed a local genealogist, Julian Preisler, whom Kraft hired to research his family history. Over the next year, Preisler unearthed a wealth of information, tracing the family back to Eva Ahrens of Amsterdam, born in 1790, who came to the United States in 1838 as part of a group of Dutch Jews. Kraft also learned that ancestors from both his father’s and mother’s families, Krafts and Friedmans, may have lived at one time in the same city in Germany.

The Krafts came to Wheeling in the 1860s. Despite being foreigners and despite their desire to assimilate, what the Krafts did in Wheeling was found a synagogue. His great-grandfather, Samuel, raised the money and was a president of the congregation, as was his grandfather, Louis.

“Five generations ago,” his forebears, Kraft said, “were proudly and overtly Jewish.” This touched Kraft, who was struck by “the bravery of it.”

Today, Kraft wonders why his father abandoned this pride in their identity.

Last summer Kraft and his family traveled to Israel, a trip that further reinforced his feelings about being Jewish. “What the last few years have done in a subtle way,” Kraft said, is bring him to abandon the last vestiges of his father’s attitude of being “careful” about being Jewish.

Kraft now wonders what the next step might be: “Will I get bar mitzvahed?”

He doesn’t know. But one thing’s for sure – if it happens, there’s bound to be great music at the reception.



The Kraft of Movie Music Read More »

Jewish activists on Darfur laud new U.S. policy

Jewish activists concerned with Darfur are giving high marks to the new U.S. policy toward Sudan, but some are cautioning that the real test is how the strategy is implemented.

The policy announced Monday by the Obama administration includes incentives if the government of Sudan acts to improve the situation on the ground and advance peace, and increased pressure from the United States and the international community if Sudan does not.

“It’s a great first step forward,” said the president of the American Jewish World Service president, Ruth Messinger, whose organization has been a leading voice among Jewish groups in protesting the genocide in Darfur.

Messinger said, however, that the policy should not be “an end in itself.”

“We ought to see specific, concrete results” from the Sudanese government in the next few months, she said, or “we ought to see clear evidence of pressure or sanctions coming from every different place in the administration where they could come.”

The White House said its policy has three goals: an end to the conflict, human rights abuses and genocide in Darfur; the implementation of the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement between Sudan’s Muslim North and Christian South; and assurance that Sudan does not provide a safe haven for terrorists.

The new strategy comes after a debate in which the U.S. envoy to the region, J. Scott Gration, reportedly favored greater engagement with Sudanese leaders and others in the administration, especially the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, favored getting tougher on the Sudanese government. The policy appears to combine both approaches.

The balance between incentives and hard benchmarks is “exactly the right approach” to make clear to Sudanese leaders what they need to do, said the director of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, Rabbi David Saperstein. “It sends a very clear message of continued United States attention and engagement, and exactly what is expected of them to improve the situation.”

Saperstein added that the focus on the 2005 agreement, which ended a 20-year civil war between Muslims in northern Sudan and Christians in southern Sudan that left 2 million dead and 4 million homeless, was crucial, as it clarifies that the United States is fully behind the referendum vote on secession by the South. The referendum is supposed to take place by the end of 2010.

Many believe that the conflict between North and South paved the way for the six-year campaign of rape, expulsion and murder against the residents of Darfur by the government-backed Janjaweed militia. Hundreds of thousands have died and more than 2.5 million have fled their homes to live in refugee camps in the region or in the neighboring countries of Chad and the Central African Republic.

“I’m pleased they’re taking the comprehensive approach,” Rabbi Steve Gutow, president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, said of the Obama administration. The debate in the administration helped make clear that the administration can’t provide “too many carrots and not enough toughness” to the Sudanese, he said.

Other advocates, while glad to see the White House lay out a clear policy, were anxious to see a change in Darfur, where the genocide is believed to have declined in intensity but still continues.

“It’s great in theory,” said Sara Caine Kornfeld, department chair of tikkun olam at the Herzl/RMHA Upper School in Denver and founder of an international movement of high school students concerned with Darfur.

“We’re waiting to see how it’s implemented,” she said. “We need to see a lot more action.”

Tzivia Schwartz-Getzug, executive director of Jewish World Watch, a coalition of more than 60 California synagogues against genocide and other human rights abuses, expressed similar sentiment.

“We’ve heard policies, seen written statements, but at the end of the day,” she said, the key is “whether there’s actual change on the ground. We’re seeing a unified clear policy, but we need to be very cautious, and we need to hold the administration’s feet to the fire.”

Jewish activists on Darfur laud new U.S. policy Read More »

Picks and Clicks for October 24– 30, 2009

SAT | OCTOBER 24

(BOOK TALK)
Mitch Albom, best-selling author of “Tuesdays With Morrie” and “The Five People You Meet in Heaven,” discusses his new book, “Have a Little Faith,” with Rabbi David Wolpe of Sinai Temple. The dialogue, “What About God and Having a Little Faith?” will be followed by a book signing. Sat. 7 p.m. $20 (Sinai members), $25 (general). Tickets include a copy of Albom’s latest book. Sinai Temple, 10400 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles. (310) 481-3243. {encode=”dgreenbaum@sinaitemple.org” title=”dgreenbaum@sinaitemple.org”}.

(CONCERT)
Jewish musicians perform works by Brahms, Rachmaninoff, Tchaikovsky and others in a new series, “Music Together: A Classical Music Concert Series,” aiming to bring the Jewish community closer together through a shared musical experience. Sponsored by The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles and the JCC at Milken. Sat. 2 p.m. Next concert, Dec. 6. $15. JCC at Milken, 22622 Vanowen St., West Hills. (718) 902-3131. {encode=”hearmusictogether@yahoo.com” title=”hearmusictogether@yahoo.com”}.

(FILM FESTIVAL)
The 2009 Arpa International Film Festival hosts its Peace in the Middle East/Armin T. Wegner Program, featuring two films: “Voices From Inside — Israelis Speak,” a documentary highlighting the stories of 16 Israelis active in the peace movement, and “When the Voices Fade,” a 21-minute short exploring the Lebanese-Israeli conflict through the tale of a Lebanese dance instructor and an Israeli army pilot. Sat. 3:30 p.m. $11. Egyptian Theatre, 6712 Hollywood Blvd., Hollywood. ” title=”usc.edu/casdeninstitute”>usc.edu/casdeninstitute.

THU | OCTOBER 29

(BOOK FESTIVAL)
The Jewish Federation of the Greater San Gabriel and Pomona Valleys has assembled a diverse lineup of Jewish authors for its 11th annual Jewish Book Festival: comedian Carol Leifer, who wrote “When You Lie About Your Age, the Terrorists Win”; Peter Manseau, who just received the National Jewish Book Award for fiction with “Songs for the Butcher’s Daughter”; sports writer Ira Berkow; children’s author April Halprin Wayland; Noah Alper, founder of Noah’s Bagels and author of “Business Mensch”; and others. First event (Carol Leifer): Thu. 7:30 p.m. Free. Pasadena Jewish Temple & Center, Shaarei Torah Campus, 550 S. Second Ave., Arcadia. Festival runs through Dec. 5 at various venues. (626) 332-0700. ” title=”international.ucla.edu/israel”>international.ucla.edu/israel.

(MUSIC)
Local musical collective Fool’s Gold perform their blend of Western pop, African melodies and Hebrew lyrics as part of KCRW’s Sounds Around Town series of free concerts at Westfield Century City’s outdoor terrace. Thu. 7-9 p.m. Free. Westfield Century City, Dining Terrace, 10250 Santa Monica Blvd., Century City. kcrw.com/events/sounds-around-town. Picks and Clicks for October 24– 30, 2009 Read More »

Meditations on a Goat

I’ve never been a sit-still meditator.  I tried it once when I was 23 and living in San Francisco and trying things.  One week I read Ram Dass and that weekend I decided, as generations of my ancestors did before me, to try Buddhism.  I signed up for a meditation weekend at Tassajara in Green Gulch, just north of the city.

I hated everything about that weekend but the food.  I had the Tassajara cook book, full of brown rice and sea weed and stir fries and tempeh—things that are time consuming to shop for and prepare—so I appreciated that the kitchen staff would be making those recipes for me.  Buit in between meals I had to sit on the floor in a long airy conference room and meditate.  Stay still. Cross my legs until they inevitably cramped or fell asleep.

A monk walked back and forth like a colonel in Stalag 17 and used a single strong finger to poke the place on my back that he wanted me to straighten.  I spent every session trying to gauge by the sound of his barefoot steps how close he was to me and when the next finger poke would come.  I decided that except for the food, I’m a lousy Buddhist.

And I still can’t meditate, not like that anyway.

I’m envious that my wife incorporates meditation into her daily routine.  She holes up in her study, sits on the floor, and just…sits on the floor.  I peak in sometimes and watch her, which seems pretty romantic to me.  She wears sunglasses and a hoodie.  I call it Unabomber Meditation.  It clearly works for her.

My own meditation is this:  I watch the goat and chickens.

This past July I rescued a pygmy goat from the same Huntington Park butcher store cum pet shop I rescued our chickens from. It’s a longer story, which I’ll get to, but one thing I’ve found is that a goat can be…entrancing. 

Evidently I’m not alone.  There’s a whole book, “The Year of the Goat,” that chronicles the adventures of a couple who left their home and set out on a year-long journey to document goat-raising in America.  It is not sappy or farm-y or simply nostalgic: Margaret Hathaway and Karl Schatz are photo-journalists who clearly see a link between the health of “goat culture” in America and the health of the family farm, the environment and the food supply.  (Schatz himself is a Time magazine photog who also authored,  “A Culture Rekindled: Jewish Traditions Return To Russia.” In 1994 he traveled to Poland to document the creation of Warsaw’s first Jewish day school in 45 years.).  Even if you haven’t fallen under the goat spell, you’ll like this book.

Anyway, last evening I got home from work as the sun was setting, went to the backyard, and just stared at the goat.  This morning I took my cup of hot yerba mate out and sippd it while I, yes, stared at the goat.  She crunches dry brown ficus leaves and berries.  Nibbles the weeds. Tastes the bamboo.  And I just watch her, like Walt Whitman lost in his cows, “I think I could turn and live with Animals…”

When darkness fell, I returned the goat—her name is Goldie Horn- to her fenced in yard and walked back inside.  I was calm.  I was centered.  I had meditated.

Meditations on a Goat Read More »

Attacks on J Street as parley approaches

Days before the inaugural conference of the left-wing pro-Israel group J Street, critics’ attacks on the organization are having an effect.

At least 10 members of Congress in recent days have removed their names from the conference’s 160-person congressional host committee, many after inquiries from a writer at a prominent conservative magazine. J Street canceled a poetry session scheduled for the conference after controversial remarks made by one of the planned participants were publicized in that same magazine. And the Israeli Embassy announced that it would be sending only an observer, not Ambassador Michael Oren, to the parley.

Meanwhile, J Street announced that it had secured a high-ranking Obama administration official to keynote the Oct. 25-28 event in Washington: President Obama’s national security adviser, James Jones.

The criticism underscores the controversy J Street has stirred in the Jewish community, particularly given its warm reception from Obama administration officials.

Many pro-Israel critics say J Street’s advocacy—including opposition to tougher Iran sanctions at this time and support for U.S. pressure on Israel and the Palestinians in pursuit of a two-state solution—undermines the Israeli government and Israel’s welfare. The group also has drawn fire for criticizing Israel’s invasion of Gaza last winter and refusing to place the blame for the confrontation on Hamas.

J Street, which calls itself “pro-Israel, pro-peace,” says the policies it pursues are in Israel’s best interests.

StandWithUs, a pro-Israel group, was planning this week to place advertisements expressing concern with J Street in the Washington Post and Washington Jewish Week.

The trouble for J Street’s poetry session came last week, when the Web site of The Weekly Standard posted a video in which poet Josh Healey, a scheduled participant, talks about how for his friends “Anne Frank is Matthew Shepard” and “Guantanamo is Auschwitz.” In another poem the Standard reprinted, Healey wonders whether “the chosen people” have been “chosen to recreate our own history, merely reversing the roles with the script now reading that we’re the ones writing numbers on the wrists of babies born in the ghetto called Gaza?”

J Street canceled the session Monday.

The group’s executive director, Jeremy Ben-Ami, said that “as J Street is critical of the use and abuse of Holocaust imagery and metaphors by politicians and pundits on the right, it would be inappropriate for us to feature poets at our conference whose poetry has used such imagery in the past and might also be offensive to some conference participants.”

Another session, which is not officially part of the conference but to which J Street is giving hotel space during the event, will include writers who have harshly criticized Israel and questioned its right to exist as a Jewish state. It is sponsored by blogger Richard Silverstein; J Street officials said they have nothing to do with the program.

Members of Congress began taking themselves off the conference host committee last week. Most of the 10 who removed themselves blamed staffers who they said were not knowledgable about the positions J Street espouses before agreeing to put their boss on the committee. (J Street acknowledged that the presence on the list of U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat, was an error; Sen. Chuck Schumer, also a New York Democrat, originally agreed but pulled out before J Street released the committee list last month.)

In an e-mail to supporters, J Street blamed The Weekly Standard for the withdrawals, saying the magazine’s “thuggish smear tactics” were having an impact on Capitol Hill. The e-mail urged supporters to fight back by calling members of Congress to thank them for being a part of the conference host committee.

Michael Goldfarb, the editor for the Weekly Standard who wrote about J Street, said he takes J Street’s attack against him as a compliment.

“They say the ‘thuggish smears are having an impact,’ ” Goldfarb said. “They’re not having an impact because they’re smears. They’re having an impact because they’re true.”

On Tuesday, the Israeli Embassy in Washington released a statement saying it would send an observer to the conference and would “follow its proceedings with interest,” but Oren, whom J Street had invited, would not attend. The statement added that the embassy has been “privately communicating its concerns over certain policies of the organization that may impair the interests of Israel.”

J Street’s director of policy and strategy, Hadar Susskind, said he sees the attacks on the organization and its conference as “a sign that we are waking people up” and making a mark on the U.S.-Israel relationship.

He also noted that more than 1,200 people had signed up to attend the conference.

Attacks on J Street as parley approaches Read More »

Trust remains an issue in Obama-Bibi relationship

With the major knots that bedeviled U.S.-Israel ties this summer largely behind them, U.S., Israeli and American Jewish leaders say the relationship between the two countries is much improved.

But with some misapprehension and mistrust persisting, all sides appear to agree that things could bear further improvement.

Among the thorniest issues: a mutual perception between the Obama and Netanyahu administrations that each side is playing the other using leaks.

The differences are broad enough that Israeli and American Jewish organizational officials met last week at a retreat in Glen Cove, N.Y., for a private discussion of “The Israeli public’s low approval rating of Barack Obama” under the aegis of the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, a think tank affiliated with the Jewish Agency for Israel.

Dan Shapiro, who runs Israel issues at the White House’s National Security Council, addressed the group and listened to the concerns of an array of Jewish organizational leaders, Israeli diplomats and opinion shapers.

The consensus: Obama should reach out to Israel.

“President Obama should visit Israel and cultivate a relationship with the American Jewish community” was the headline of the institute’s news release summarizing the retreat.

Avinoam Bar-Yosef, the institute’s director, said the issue of trust was key to the discussion.

“The Obama administration is trying to promote a series of things, and they need a counterpart which is trusting them,” Bar-Yosef told JTA. “Trust was built and a serious dialogue has been started, but there is not yet a solution on everything. There is much more room for improvement.”

Obama administration officials attributed several problems of miscommunication in the early months to the fact that both Israel and Washington had new administrations getting their respective acts together, with each side too busy to maintain the necessary frequency of communication.

That led to harmful leaks, particularly related to the U.S. insistence that Israel freeze settlement construction in the West Bank. Following a barrage of leaks coming from Jerusalem on the subject, a reportedly furious U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton finally made the dispute public.

And prior to Israel’s announcement in early September that it would build 455 new units in Jewish settlements in the West Bank, U.S. officials told reporters that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu needed to understand how his relationship with Obama depended on whether the Israeli leader understood that he faced a “pivotal” moment in history.

Netanyahu’s advisers chafed at this as high handed and arrogant.

Insiders now insist that relations are smoother. Shapiro and Uzi Arad, Netanyahu’s top national security adviser, talk all the time. Yitzhak Molcho, another Netanyahu adviser, and Mike Herzog, Defense Minister Ehud Barak’s top adviser, visit Washington at least twice a month to meet with top officials at the Pentagon and the State Department.

Within the Obama administration is a sense that the disagreement in September over settlement construction exemplifies, if anything, how the relationship has improved: Netanyahu’s staff gave the White House a heads-up on the plan to give a green light to 455 new housing units, and the White House had time to prepare a tough response that helped it save face in the Arab world.

In some areas, U.S.-Israel ties have grown closer.

Speaking earlier this month at a conference at the conservative Hudson Institute on the subject of “Challenges to the Special Relationship,” Michael Oren, the Israeli envoy to Washington, noted the intensity of U.S.-Israeli coordination on combating the U.N. Human Rights Council’s Goldstone report, which accused Israel of war crimes during last winter’s war in Gaza with Hamas.

Oren said the sides also agree on the need to isolate Iran as long as it appears to be pursuing nuclear weapons, and on the pace of applying sanctions on the Islamic Republic. He also said defense cooperation was closer than ever and that the Obama administration was redressing a decline in recent years of Israel’s qualitative military edge in the Middle East.

The Obama and Netanyahu administrations even have arrived at an agreement on freezing settlements, according to Oren. The freeze would not include Jerusalem and would account for some “natural growth” in West Bank settlement blocs Israel plans to keep in a final-status agreement.

The real problem is with the Palestinians, Oren said, who continue to insist on a total settlement freeze, and not between the United States and Israel.

But many members of the pro-Israel community remain upset about at the Obama administration for its focus on Jewish settlements in the West Bank. They say this focus makes settlements appear to be the obstacle to peace while giving the Palestinians and Arab states a pass on making concessions.

The Palestinians have rejected U.S. pressure to accommodate a partial freeze, and Arab nations have yet to announce the symbolic gestures Obama was hoping to secure for Israel as a reward for a freeze.

According to U.S. administration insiders, a number of Arab nations were ready to announce concessions—such as allowing Israeli civilian aircraft overflight rights and expanding business ties with Israel—but withdrew them after the Netanyahu government announced the new construction in the West Bank in September.

Obama administration officials say they understand that settlements are not the sine qua non of advancing the peace process, but they wonder why Israel does not address settlement issues even while the Obama administration presses the Palestinians and the Arabs for concessions.

It hasn’t helped the Obama-Netanyahu relationship that the U.S. administration continues to lavish attention on J Street, a lobbying and political action committee that describes itself as “pro-peace, pro-Israel.” The group has upset many U.S. Jews with its positions on Israel; the Israeli government has kept it at arm’s length.

James Jones, Obama’s national security adviser, is speaking this month to J Street and the American Task Force on Palestine, a group that lobbies for U.S. action to promote the creation of a Palestinian state. (Jones also will address the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Israel’s stalwart advocate in Washington, at AIPAC’s annual national summit in San Diego.)

Additionally, last weekend’s annual Washington Institute for Near East Policy Weinberg retreat, usually a venue for high-minded exchanges between Israeli and U.S. officials, lacked any Obama administration officials. Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, withdrew at the last moment, apparently because of the burgeoning crisis in Afghanistan.

Mullen’s cancellation was too late to compensate with a commensurate speaker, and in the absence of an Obama administration official, speaker after speaker faulted the administration in its dealings with Israel, the Arabs and Iran.

In Israel, a consensus is emerging that Obama needs to pay more attention to Israel.

Ofir Pines Paz, a Labor Party Knesset member who otherwise opposes the Netanyahu government’s policies, this month told a pro-Obama group, the New American Foundation, that the president needed to reach out to Israel.

“It’s something that should be tackled,” he said. “Maybe not by a speech, but not by hesitation. He shouldn’t give up on Israeli public opinion.”

Oren said as much to the Hudson Institute, referring to Obama’s single-digit approval ratings in the Jewish state.

“We have to get this number up,” he said. Establishing trust in the U.S. administration among Israelis “is a sine qua non of the peace process.”

Trust remains an issue in Obama-Bibi relationship Read More »

Israel pulls history textbook from shelves

Israel’s Education Ministry is pulling a history textbook from school and stores.

The book, which had been approved by the ministry, presents the Palestinian claim that Israel practiced “ethnic cleansing” during the 1948 War of Independence.

Ha’aretz reported that ministry officials said they found “a great many mistakes, some of them serious,” in the book, which is meant for 11th and 12th grade.

The book was not scheduled to be introduced into classrooms until January. It will be corrected and reviewed again before being replaced on bookshelves in Israeli classrooms and stores.

Israel pulls history textbook from shelves Read More »

Top Jewish Non Profit

You have 11 days to enter your favorite Jewish charity to win a Jewish Choice Award 2009 from the web site GreatNonprofits.org. It’s a legit group with a great track record, and now it’s out to draw great Jewish non-profits, and the people who love and use them, to its site.  here’s the scoop:

N

onprofits with at least 10 positive reviews (4 or 5 stars) will receive exposure to potential donors via the GreatNonprofits list of Top-Rated Jewish Nonprofits and via Guidestar, the premier site for philanthropic research on the Web. Plus, nonprofits with the most positive reviews in their regions and budget sizes will receive badges, a free project posting on JGooders.com, and additional media promotion.

Nonprofits can take this opportunity to invite stakeholders – clients, volunteers, donors and partners – to write a review. They will gain powerful, authentic stories that they can use in internal and external communications. Community members will be sharing with the public their best experiences with nonprofits. Contest deadline: October 31st

Are you a nonprofit? Scroll down to see tips for gathering reviews!

“Reviews show the real human impact of a nonprofits and raise the visibility and credibility of those organizations,” says GreatNonprofits CEO Perla Ni. “This will help highly-rated nonprofits attract more support and volunteers.”

GreatNonprofits is a nonprofit Web site where people can post reviews of nonprofit organizations, similar to Yelp or TripAdvisor.

Nonprofits with the most positive reviews in their category will be announced as winners and receive promotion on GuideStar.org. Awards will be given out of 10 categories (6 geographic US regions, 1 international, and 3 budget size – small, medium and large). 

In addition, everyone who writes a review is eligible to win great prizes such as signed copies of “Business Mensch,” by Noah Alper, free Noahs’ Bagels, and a stay at Kimpton hotels.

The contest deadline is October 31.  Gentlemen and ladies, start your entries…..

Top Jewish Non Profit Read More »

Rush Limbaugh and the Use and Abuse of the Racism Charge

Now that Rush Limbaugh’s name has been dropped from a consortium bidding to buy the National Football League’s Saint Louis Rams, there’s a bit of summarizing that needs to be done.

A lot has been said over the last week about Rush’s involvement in the bid, and now that he’s been forced to drop out, based on claims that’s he’s a racist, many are gloating over what they see as a major victory over the hated conservative talk show host.

Rush is a big boy, with one of the nation’s largest megaphones in the form of a nationally-syndicated radio talk show – one that has the country’s largest listener ratings, so he’s more than capable of defending himself.

Seldom however, do the tactics of the nation’s race industry become so completely transparent.  And rarely does the leftward tilt of the nation’s mainstream media get displayed in such obvious ways.

As soon as it became public that Limbaugh had been invited to join with an investment group trying to buy the Rams, Reverend Al Sharpton sent a letter to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell arguing that the bid should be rejected because Limbaugh is a racist.

What is true is that Limbaugh is flamboyant, can be controversial, and pokes fun at his targets of the day – much in the way that comics and talk-show hosts do on late-night television.

We may need to be reminded that this is the same Al Sharpton who acted as the mouth-piece for Tawana Brawley, a black teen-age girl who claimed she’d been raped by a gang of white men.  As we were to discover, much like the recent Colorado balloon hoax, her story had been completely made-up without a shred of truth after tremendous media attention.  Part of the fall-out was that Sharpton lost a defamation court case.

This is the same Al Sharpton involved in the infamous 1995 “Freddy’s incident” at a Harlem store of the same name.  Sharpton called the Jewish store owner “a white interloper.”  His rabble rousing contributed to an environment that resulted in a shooting and fire-bombing at Freddy’s that left seven innocents dead.

He has never accepted his responsibility for these actions – apparently, being Al Sharpton, especially the 2009 version, means never having to say you’re sorry.

What had Limbaugh done to bring about such an overwhelming media reaction and virtual consensus that he is a racist? 

While briefly working as an NFL commentator for ESPN in 2003, Limbaugh offered the opinion that: “I think what we’ve had here is a little social concern in the NFL.  The media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well.” And “There is a little hope invested in McNabb, and he got a lot of credit for the performance of this team that he didn’t deserve.  The defense carried this team.”  Take issue with this if you like, but it was simply Limbaugh’s opinion.  Was it racist?  It is … only if you think criticizing a black quarterback is racist.

At the time I disagreed with Limbaugh, I think McNabb has been a tough, competent – if somewhat erratic– competitor; calling Limbaugh a racist for his opinion is at best overly sensitive.  Even the liberal Slate Magazine agreed with Rush’s assessment, saying “Limbaugh was right. Donovan McNabb isn’t a great quarterback, and the media do overrate him because he’s black.”  Is Slate racist as well?  It didn’t matter, the spine-less executives at ESPN summarily fired Limbaugh for his comments.

However, since the 2003 comments weren’t seen as convincing enough of Limbaugh’s racism, stories were concocted out of whole-cloth impugning Limbaugh’s racial attitudes.  Quotes were attributed to Limbaugh, and then were forwarded directly to CNN and MSNBC, which dutifully incorporated them into their reporting … uncritically.

According to the reports, Limbaugh had praised slavery and James Earl Ray, the assassin of Martin Luther King, on-air.  To his credit, only CNN’s Anderson Cooper took the time to investigate the inflammatory claims and judged them untrue.

The non-stop onslaught to derail Limbaugh’s NFL bid included dredging up a quote saying “The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Crips and the Bloods without any weapons.”  Racist you say? 

A 2008 article in the Los Angeles Times Rush Limbaugh and the Use and Abuse of the Racism Charge Read More »

Ariel Sharon’s Twilight Zone

Too healthy to die, too injured to rule, Israel’s legendary warrior and former prime minister lives in a comatose limbo—just like the Middle East peace process.

The old soldier’s eyes are open. Sometimes he’s propped up in front of a TV, where images of nature and animals, especially cows, flicker across the screen. His family tells him the day’s news, the goings on at his beloved farm. They read to him, alternating between two books at a time, just as he used to do for himself. They play classical music. When his white hair grows long, they trim it. And once in a while, when someone tells him to move a toe, he does.

Whether Ariel Sharon takes in any of this activity, no one knows for sure. Because Israel’s once-robust prime minister and legendary battlefield hero—the decorated warrior, the controversial hawk and finally, beginning in 2001, the centrist prime minister who transformed the political landscape—has been in a coma for nearly four years, felled by a massive stroke. While not brain-dead, the 81 year old exists in a persistent vegetative state. He generally breathes on his own, but must be fed by a tube. He cannot speak, walk, or think. Probably.

Read the full story at TheDailyBeast.com.

Ariel Sharon’s Twilight Zone Read More »