fbpx

October 2, 2009

Gilad Shalit being treated “wonderfully”

SEE THE VIDEO BELOW
Read the full English transcript at HAARETZ.com.

Kidnapped IDF soldier Gilad Shalit appears to be healthy in a video aired on Israeli television stations Friday.

Shalit, captured by Hamas more than three years ago, is seen clean shaven and with a fresh haircut, wearing dark clothes and appearing relaxed in the two-minute video.

In the video, Shalit reads a statement that says he’s been treated well by the mujahadeen of the Kassam Brigades, expresses the hope that Benjamin Netanyahu’s government will secure his release soon and addresses his family directly. At one point walks up to the camera and then returns to his chair. He holds a Palestinian newspaper dated Sept. 14, 2009.

Netanyahu watched the tape and said in a statement that “he believes the importance of the tape is in putting the responsibility for Gilad’s health and well being squarely on Hamas’s shoulders.”

Israel received the video in exchange for the release of 20 female Palestinian prisoners.

Israel Radio reported that the video meets the criteria of a deal struck in recent weeks through a German mediator: It is 2.5 minutes long, more than twice the required length of one minute; Shalit appears to be in good health; and proof is included to show that it was shot recently.

Read the full English transcript at HAARETZ.com.

 

Gilad Shalit being treated “wonderfully” Read More »

Nuclear Iran

Uri’s Latest from The Miami Herald:

Posted on Fri, Oct. 02, 2009

A nuclear Iran: The world was warned

BY URI DROMI

Good morning, World, Iran is ready to go nuclear!

A uranium enrichment facility nobody knew of suddenly emerges in the sacred city of Qom, Iran launches missiles that can threaten not only U.S. targets in the Persian gulf, but also Israel and southern Europe, and now the world panics.

Surprised? Not if you’re an Israeli. For years we have been sounding the alarm, only to be told to stop crying wolf. Now we are asked to lie low and let the responsible leaders of the world take care of the situation.

In 1993, when I was the spokesman of the Israeli government, my boss, Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, made a dramatic turn in his hitherto coherent perception about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Contrary to his previous declarations, that the PLO was not a credible partner for peace, Rabin unexpectedly gave his blessing—albeit half-heartedly—to the Oslo process.

I was curious to find out what made him change his mind. He was not a man of elaborate explanations. Sometimes you just had to guess from his body language what made him tick. It was in the middle of an interview when a European journalist mentioned Iran in passing, that Rabin banged the table and said in a coarse voice: “Exactly!’’ The rest came out during a later interview: We have to mend fences with our closer neighbors (the Palestinians and Jordanians), Rabin said, so that we can brace ourselves to tackle the bigger challenge rising over the horizon: Iran.

Taking the cue from Rabin, I started to talk to the representatives of the world media based in Jerusalem about the Iranian nuclear threat. I told them that it was not an Israeli issue only, that a Shiite Iran with nukes would cause havoc in the Sunni Mideast, with serious repercussions for the rest of the world.

The response was usually shoulder shrugging, glazed eyes and insinuations that Israel was trying to lure the United States into attacking Iran for Israel’s interests. In short, the tail was trying to wag the dog.

I had to remind them that in 1981, when Israel attacked the Iraqi nuclear reactor, it had been condemned right and left, with the United Nations ruling that Israel should pay compensation to Iraq. Ten years later, in the wake of Desert Storm, then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney gave a photograph of the bombed reactor to Maj. Gen. David Ivry, who commanded the Israeli Air Force during the attack, on which he wrote, “With thanks and appreciation for the outstanding job [you] did on the Iraqi Nuclear Program in 1981 which made our job much easier in Desert Storm.’‘

It’s not that we Israelis are smarter than anybody else, or that we are blessed with a unique talent to foresee the future. It’s just that whenever there has been a threat to the free world we have been there first, on the frontline, on the receiving end. Not willing ever to surrender to the threat, we came up with our original responses.

When the first Israeli airliner was hijacked to Algiers in 1968, we made El Al the world’s safest airline. When Israelis were hijacked while flying Air France, we launched the Entebbe Raid to rescue them.

When Palestinian terrorists blew themselves up in the midst of our cities, we built a security fence that stopped them. Israel bashers condemned us for creating the barrier, which made life difficult for the Palestinians. Yet now, in hindsight, will they admit that life comes before quality of life?

And when our enemies started launching rockets at our cities, while hiding themselves among civilians, we were not intimidated: we went after them, trying to sort the villain from the innocent. We were heavily criticized for the way we did it, we still are: This is a very messy task indeed.

Yet Western soldiers and officers fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, and the people who have sent them to the battlefield, all know perfectly well that we have spearheaded a path for them; that we have shown a way where democracies can walk the thin line between keeping human rights and fighting terror effectively.

One day, when the weight of terror will become unbearable, the rest of the world will maybe understand as well.

Nuclear Iran Read More »

Toddler Classes

I can’t believe these classes offered for toddlers.  Gymnastics, guitar, piano, ice skating, sculpting, painting, knitting, typing, ballet and hip hop dancing.  Rock climbing and fencing, now that’s just too much.  Just another scheme to suck mommy into, and make a buck or two or $275 per session. What are these mom’s thinking?  What will be left for these kids to learn when they are four years old?

I don’t know what they are thinking. 
Bye for now…off take my three year old to his hip hop class…

Toddler Classes Read More »

How to build a sukkah [VIDEO]

How to build a sukkah [VIDEO] Read More »

Tarantino and “Basterds” Come to Israel

Quentin Tarantino winced as the young Israeli journalist took the microphone and asked what must rank as one of the heavier questions he’s ever encountered: “How do you relate to the Jewish tragedy of the Holocaust personally?”

“How do I answer that?” Tarantino replied, his eyes darting around the press conference at a seaside Tel Aviv hotel on the eve of the Israeli premiere of “Inglourious Bastereds”.  Referring briefly to his visit to the Yad Vashem Holocaust memorial the previous day, he answered tersely: “I think I respond to it as every human being should.”

In Israel, where Holocaust memory casts its longest shadow, the question was just one of many on the topic lobbed at Tarantino. The Holocaust-focused quizzing came in marked contrast to the absence of such questions at the press conference at Cannes Film Festival where he introduced the movie.

It is this ingrained Holocaust consciousness that colors Israelis’ alternating repulsion, delight, and fascination with the movie hailed abroad as “Kosher Porn,” a fantastical universe of Jewish revenge on the Nazis. It’s been playing to packed theatres and in some cities seats need to be ordered at least a day in advance.  The audiences heartily cheer, clap and laugh through their cinematic ride with a band of Nazi-scalping U.S. Jewish soldiers alongside the accompanying parallel plot of a beautiful, blond Jewess plotting her final revenge.

Critics offered up both praise and bitter words – Maariv newspaper’s Meir Schnitzer went as far as comparing Tarantino to David Irving, the infamous Holocaust denier. A divide was also seen among the regular movie-going masses.

“It’s all the talk at the water cooler, and the differences of opinion are incredible,” said Omri Marcus, a senior comedy writer at an Israeli television show describing the scene at his office. 

For Marcus himself and many others it was ultimately the real history of the Holocaust that made the movie so difficult to digest.

It was a pale, shaken-looking Erez Makovy, 31, who emerged from a darkened 500-seat theatre, filled to capacity. The crowd had gone silent watching the carnage climax in which the Nazi leadership is devoured by flames and automatic gunfire. But it broke into loud applause when Brad Pitt’s swash-buckling U.S. lieutenant character carved what became a trademark swastika into the forehead of the S.S. officer who serves as the film’s villain in chief.

“The movie left me with a bitter taste in my mouth,” said Makovy, a musician who was disturbed by the audiences’ cheers.

His friend, Itai Zangi, 27, a music producer, however, was among the laugh-out-loud, clapping masses. “It’s nice to be on the winning side, for once. I liked that he (Tarantino) turned things totally upside down.”

Nearby, also contemplating the experience, was Hila Schuman, a 32-year-old biologist. “It’s a bit too over-the-top.  For Israelis, it’s hard to take a story out of the context we know so well. So we’re left asking: Is this a parody? Is it serious? … Or is this just what revenge would look like on LSD.” 

Tarantino, in this, his first visit to Israel, said he had been anxious to see how an Israeli audience would react.

His most recent films – the “Kill Bill” series did poorly here ,with “Death Proof” vanishing just a week after hitting the screens.

On stage at the premiere at the Tel Aviv Cinematheque, the lanky Tarantino pumped up the audience waving his hands and shouting out, “So are you guys ready to kills some Nazis? Are you ready to f-ck up some Nazis? Let’s get this mother f—-cker started.” 

A Haaretz reporter who attended the premiere said that Tarantino got what he was looking for, with enthusiastic cheering and laughter throughout and a standing ovation to finish it off. She added, “the excitement level could be judged by the fact that there was very little complaining, shouting or seat-shifting — all standards of the Israeli movie-going experience.”  (http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1115023.html)

Leading the anti-cheering squad has been Schnitzer, the film critic for Maariv.

“It’s not that ‘Inglorious Basterds’ denies the Holocaust. It’s not that movies cannot make up history. It’s simply that Quentin Tarantino has created yet another slasher film devoid of any morality, and this time he does it while ignoring the Holocaust.’’

Schnitzer, himself the son of Polish Holocaust survivors (and named after a half-brother killed by the Nazis), writes that the amoral universe the film inhabits allows for “the creation of a reality where a Nazi is a cultural, polite, graceful and royal figure, and the Jews are barbarians, scalping men of the jungle. It’s a ruse that [David] Irving could be proud of.’’

In part for budgetary reasons almost all Israeli Holocaust-related films have focused on the stories of survivors after the war, not the real-time action and events of the war itself.

“Israelis have a very specific reaction to films dealing with the Holocaust … as in what is permissible and what isn’t,” said Shmulik Duvdevani, the film critic for the website Y-Net, noting the special sensitivities here surrounding the Holocaust and its portrayal.

“Jews are to be portrayed as victims and movies are to tell stories of extermination, not comic ones, but tragic ones and Tarantino does the opposite, taking everything to the most radical extreme,” said Duvdevani. 

Uri Klein, the movie critic for Haaretz wrote that he preferred Tarantino’s approach, absurd and fictionalized as it was, to what he views as the sentimentality of Spielberg’s “Schindler’s List.”

It’s a film Klein says he enjoyed for its vitality and even the problems it raises, explaining, “Tarantino is not Jewish, and I have a sense he does not know what it means to be a Jew. Maybe this is why it’s easier for me to accept what he does in the movie.”

Perhaps its also part of why the lines to see it are so long at Israeli movie theatres.

Tarantino and “Basterds” Come to Israel Read More »

Why Jews Would Make Great Zombies (Top 10 Reasons)

Zombieland,” a post-apocalyptic zombie comedy written by Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick and directed by Ruben Fleischer is out today, surprise cameo (which Variety spoiled) and all. Starring Woody Harrelson and Jesse Eisenberg (”Adventureland”), America’s answer to “Shaun of the Dead” has won over critics and it’s inspired GeekHeeb to consider the…

Top 10 Reasons Why Jews Would Make Great Zombies

10. Brains can’t be half as bad as beet-jellied gefilte fish.

9. Deathly moaning made more jaunty with a nigun.

8. Jewish community already rife with soulless animated creatures who have insatiable appetites—lawyers.

7. Torah walk + foot drag—the perfect zombie shlep.

6. Chraiiiiiiiiiiiiiin.

5. Attacking a Jewish zombie = hate crime. Thanks ADL!

4. Returning from the dead saves relatives days sitting shiva.

3. None of that rank embalming fluid smell.

2. Unlike a golem, you’re your own boss.

1. Lose a body part? Been there, done that. (guys only)

Why Jews Would Make Great Zombies (Top 10 Reasons) Read More »

Nahai resigns from DWP

H. David Nahai has resigned from his position as CEO and general manager of the L.A. Department of Water and Power (DWP) to pursue a senior advisor position with the Clinton Climate Initiative. The resignation is effective immediately.

Nahai has been with the utility agency since 2005, when he was appointed to the DWP Commission by L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, first as vice president and then as president of the commission. In 2007, the mayor appointed Nahai as the department’s chief executive. According to the Los Angeles Times, Nahai has been under fire from the start:

He drew strong criticism from the head of the powerful International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 18, which represents thousands of DWP workers, who accused Nahai of doing too little to secure the passage of Measure B, a solar power ballot proposal that narrowly fell short of passage in March.

Neighborhood councils also complained of a proposal to increase electric rates. Residents of the San Fernando Valley have been upset in recent weeks over the DWP’s water conservation measures, which limited sprinkler use to two days per week. And residents across the city were perplexed by a string of water main breaks, including one that resulted in a sinkhole that gobbled up a portion of a fire truck.

Nahai did have support from environmental circles, however. Last spring, a series of environmental leaders sent Villaraigosa a letter urging him to ignore the complaints and keep Nahai.

In a statement released by the mayor’s office this morning (LA Observed), Villaraigosa said:

I would like to thank David Nahai for his four years of service at the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power where he led the team responsible for increasing the City’s renewable energy portfolio, reducing water consumption to record levels, and putting us on the path to be coal free by 2020.

I wish him great success in his new endeavor as Senior Advisor to the Clinton Climate Initiative where he will use his experience and leadership skills to advance their core mission of finding and developing workable solutions to climate change.

In his resignation letter to the DWP Board, dated Oct. 1, Nahai wrote that he was “immensely proud of what I have been able to accomplish and will forever be grateful for the invaluable experience.”

Citing changes that have taken place at the agency, Nahai added that the mayor’s goal of 20 percent renewable energy by 2010 was within reach, that his administration had completed the largest municipally owned wind farm in the country and that water conservative efforts had resulted in unprecedented reductions, among other improvements.

As far as a replacement for Nahai, Rick Orlov of the Daily News is reporting that David Freeman will likely take over as interim head of the DWP:

It is expected that Deputy Mayor David Freeman, who headed the agency from 1997-2001, will be named interim head of the department, however will not apply for the permanent post.

Nahai resigns from DWP Read More »

The H1N1 (Swine) Flu Vaccine

Countless of you (well actually, several of you) have asked me in the last few weeks “What about the swine flu vaccine?”  “Should I get it?”  “When will it be available?”  “Is it safe?”  “Does it not herald the coming of the zombie apocalypse?”  Well, your long wait for answers is finally over.

So far the H1N1 infection has caused symptoms very similar to garden variety seasonal flu, except that diarrhea and vomiting have been more common and that most hospitalizations have been in people younger than 65.  Remember, this is overall not a worse disease than the regular flu, though some groups have been particularly vulnerable.

Physicians will begin receiving shipments of the H1N1 vaccine later in October.  The H1N1 vaccine is prepared the same way as the regular influenza vaccine, so it has the same side effects and is just as safe.  Fortunately (despite conflicting reports a few months ago) one dose of the vaccine is sufficient.

The vaccine is recommended for the following five groups.

  • Everyone 6 months through 24 years of age
  • People who live with or care for infants younger than 6 months of age
  • Pregnant women
  • Healthcare workers
  • People 25 years through 64 years of age with health conditions associated with high risk for medical complications from influenza

If you’re in one of the above groups, see your doctor later this months and get the vaccine.  If you’re not, don’t.  Our office expects to receive the vaccine in the next few weeks.

Learn more:

The H1N1 (Swine) Flu Vaccine Read More »