fbpx

May 29, 2008

Starbucks and the Holocaust

Photo

Fortunately, Starbucks hasn’t been around long enough for this to be one of those stories.

Speaking to MBA students at UCLA today, Starbucks Chairman and CEO Howard Schultz, I was told, related business ethics, and his brand’s success, to compassion during the Holocaust. Schultz is a dedicated Jew—his company was boycotted because of a fabricated letter that claimed buying a latte supported Zionism—and he pulled a lesson from what an Israeli rabbi had shared with him and a group of American men on a recent visit.

The rabbi explained that when Jews arrived at the concentration camps, blankets were only given to every sixth man (I’m not certain about the veracity of this statement, but that is irrelevant). Auschwitz wasn’t exactly in a tropical setting, and these blankets were in high demand. But despite needing the warmth, the men lucky enough to receive a blanket were prone to share with their fellow prisoners.

This, Schultz said, was the human condition. We desire social connection, and we want to help those we perceive as suffering. It’s a reason, he said, that employees and customers enjoy the Third Place environment that Starbucks created. And it’s a reminder—out-of-business Joe Coffee Shop owner may want to stop reading now—to look out for the little guy in your industry.

No doubt this is a healthy lesson for UCLA’s future business leaders. And the fact that Schultz was the one to share it only means it will stick. But is it true? Is the human condition really one of compassion?

Starbucks and the Holocaust Read More »

Why the Religious Right won’t forsake McCain

Photo

John McCain is a lucky man. He’s alienated what has become an important part of the Republican Party—conservative Christians—by shoving aside the Revs. John Hagee (Hitler remarks) and Rod Parsley (general nuttiness) and staying mum on California’s Supreme Court ruling in favor of gay marriage. And yet he appears at worse in a dead heat with Barack Obama, maybe better.

How can this be? Well, Ed Stoddard writes for Reuters that McCain has a trump card guaranteeing the Religious Right’s vote:

Why the Religious Right won’t forsake McCain Read More »

In defense of John Hagee

I mentioned in a post yesterday that leading Jewish organizations have been mum on the topic of the Rev. John Hagee and his now-infamous Hitler sermon, but that some Jews have rushed to his side.

Doris Wise Montrose, L.A. president of Children of Jewish Holocaust Survivors,  said her father and his friends rarely spoke of the Holocaust without mentioning God’s hand in it. (How do you talk about tragedy, especially on such an enormous scale, without wondering where God was?)

It seems now that Hagee must be the one asking: Why? Why did the public turn against him so hard when his words weren’t universally offensive, even if they were disagreeable?

“What was most breathtaking about the debate over Pastor Hagee’s statements on the Holocaust was the complete absence of one,” David Brog, Hagee’s right-hand who recently discussed theodicy with Haaretz, wrote in an op-ed titled, “The New Inquisition.”

This was not a case where thoughtful arbiters discussed his words in the context of a rich Judeo-Christian tradition of theodicy.  There was no respect given to a quite common worldview.  There was no trial.  We skipped right to the auto da fe.

Breathe in deeply and you can still smell the embers smoldering around Pastor Hagee’s public persona.

The latest pressure is being exerted upon Sen. Joe Lieberman, who agreed to speak during the annual meeting for Hagee’s Christians United for Israel and can be seen in the above video likening Hagee to Moses. A confidant of John McCain, who pushed Hagee aside, Lieberman has refused to cut ties.

“I believe that Pastor Hagee has made comments that are deeply unacceptable and hurtful,” Lieberman said in a statement. “I also believe that a person should be judged on the entire span of his or her life’s works. Pastor Hagee has devoted much of his life to fighting anti-Semitism and building bridges between Christians and Jews.”

So what’s really going on here? Were Hagee’s words hurtful, misrepresented or, on their face, uncontroversial? The always thoughtful Rick Richman of Jewish Current Issues writes that the case is awfully flimsy. He addresses five points, among them Montrose’s letter, the repeated media criticism of Hagee, the pastor’s talk in March at Stephen S. Wise Temple and a bit of theology:

In defense of John Hagee Read More »

Even atheists have feelings

The Kern County car dealership that ran a radio ad blasting the godless is itself under attack, with critics wondering just how stupid a country-bumpkin Christian could be to dismiss 14 percent of his customer base (actually atheists account for between 3 percent and 10 percent of the U.S. population). But, in fact, Kieffe and Sons employed a tried-and-true marketing approach in this ad:

“Did you know that there are people in this country who want prayer out of schools, “Under God” out of the Pledge, and “In God We Trust” to be taken off our money?

“But did you know that 86 percent of Americans say they believe in God? Now, since we all know that 86 out of every 100 of us are Christians who believe in God, we at Kieffe and Sons Ford wonder why we don’t just tell the other 14 percent to sit down and shut up.

“I guess maybe I just offended 14 percent of the people who are listening to this message. Well, if that is the case, then I say that’s tough; this is America, folks—it’s called free speech. And none of us at Kieffe and Sons Ford are afraid to speak up. Kieffe and Sons Ford on Sierra Highway in Mojave and Rosamond: if we don’t see you today, by the grace of God, we’ll be here tomorrow.”

Rick Kieffe is backpedaling now, which should be no surprise, saying that he can’t recall approving the ad. That’s inconsequential: Kieffe and Sons Ford has already garnered international attention and, no doubt, built some serious rapport with folks who want to support this perceptively righteous battle.

Just another strange story from Kern County.

Photo

My wife hails from Bakersfield, and before I visited I always assumed it was a backward place. Having read “Mean Justice” and the “Lords of Bakersfield” series, which discussed at length a district attorney, Ed Jagels, who built his career prosecuting child-molestation rings that imprisoned dozens but never actually existed, who would disagree?

In fact, it’s a pretty decent place, a blazing hot suburb of nowhere, surrounded by the hilariously named Pumpkin Center and Weed Patch. (Disclosure: My mother-in-law has long been involved with the Chamber of Commerce and I am the owner of a coffee mug that states, “Bakersfield—Life as it should be.”)

Even atheists have feelings Read More »

Judea Pearl gets Franklin Institute award; Beach services for Lag B’Omer

Beach Mixer on Lag B’Omer

A week after Israel’s birthday, attention shifted to itchy beards. The seven-week counting of the Omer, which marks the period from Pesach to Shavuot, represents the time between the promise of freedom (Exodus) and being given the means to live with dignity (Torah). Treated as a period of mourning, the Omer has its prohibitions — no weddings, no live music, no haircuts, no partying (never mind that we all broke this one to celebrate Yom HaAtzmaut) — but on the 33rd day, Lag B’Omer, which celebrates the spiritual gifts of Rabbi Akiva and the mystical secrets espoused by his student, Rabbi Shimon Bar-Yohai, the prohibitions are lifted.

Tradition brought L.A. Jews to Dockweiler Beach for celebratory revelry. The customary bonfires blazed in the afterglow of the West Coast sunset, and Chasidic, hippie, queer and tree-hugging Jews gathered for buffet barbecues, impromptu drumming and fire-roasted marshmallows. Spread across the cold, damp sand Nashuva, JConnectLA, Aish HaTorah, Bais Bezalel, Jqueer and COEJL all demonstrated that freedom is not limited to putative Jews practicing their customs in the open, public air, but that real dignity is felt when different kinds of Jews can celebrate their freedom side by side.

Israeli Choreographers Shine at UCLA

Much of it was dark, even morose. Many dances were heavy with violence, bitterness, resentment and anger. The movements were sharp and jarring. And then the mood lightened, and the dancers frolicked across the stage with a brighter palette of steps.

The performances featured in “Bridge: Choreographic Dialogues” at UCLA’s Glorya Kaufman Dance Theater on May 4 were choreographed by four of Israel’s most creative and innovative dance minds — Idan Cohen, Niv Sheinfeld, Ronit Ziv and Barak Marshall — and reflected the complex Israeli culture that inspires their work.

Aside from Marshall, who lives in Los Angeles, the choreographers were invited for a two-week residency at the UCLA department of world arts and cultures, part of a performing arts exchange program that sent three UCLA choreographers to Tel Aviv last summer.

Working with the dancers at UCLA, the four choreographers put on a remarkable display of Israeli talent, exploring themes of infidelity, sexual harassment, loneliness, tradition, community and celebration with music that varied from the Balkan Beat Box to traditional Romanian to a piece by Frederic Chopin.

Marshall’s lively works lifted the audience out of the pensive gloom inspired by the intensity of the earlier works. With his dark curls bouncing, Marshall led the dancers in merry ethnic dances, such as “Emma Goldman’s Wedding” and “Aunt Leah,” which featured dramatic monologues by the choreographer’s mother, Margalit Oved, dressed in traditional Yemenite garb. Oved was a star in Israel’s Inbal performance troupe and has taught dance at UCLA.

After the performance, the crowd spilled into the outdoor courtyard, where Israeli food and Israeli folk dancing by David Dassa awaited them. With the addition of fried eggplants, Prigat mango juice and a “Turkish Kiss” (a line dance Dassa taught), the afternoon was not just merely entertaining, it was chaval al ha’zman (Hebrew slang for awesome).

— Dikla Kadosh, Contributing Writer



Scene and Heard


Medical Mentor

Andres Turner is part of a new generation that values practicing socially responsible medicine. The University of Pittsburgh medical student and alumni of Milken Community High School was one of only 12 students awarded a $5,000 mentoring scholarship from Kaiser Permanente. The program, which includes a four- to six-week clinical training session, is devoted to caring for Southern California’s underserved communities, already a dedicated interest of Turner’s, who served as a student coordinator for Pittsburgh’s only Spanish-speaking free clinic.

University Receives Special-Needs Education Endowment

American Jewish University received a seminal endowment from Marilyn and Stan Ross to promote special-needs education and establish a scholarship fund to benefit special-needs students. Ross is chair of the USC Lusk Center for Real Estate, where he and his wife have devoted themselves to the development of minority urban neighborhoods nationwide.

Judea Pearl in Company of Einstein, Edison, Hawking

Judea Pearl gets Franklin Institute award; Beach services for Lag B’Omer Read More »

Calendar Girls picks and clicks for May 31-June 6

SAT | MAY 31

(THEATER)
Set somewhere between 2500 B.C.E. and 3000 C.E., Tony winner Mel Shapiro’s “Homer in Cyberspace” is a wildly innovative remake of the classic Odysseus ” target=”_blank”>http://www.tickets.ucla.edu.

(ART WALK)
Los Angeles gets knocked for being light on culture and heavy on driving. Defying both of these stereotypes is Artwalk Culver City, a free daylong walking tour of 45 local art galleries and exhibition spaces, sponsored by Sony Pictures Entertainment and 89.9 FM KCRW. The thriving enclave will fling open its doors and welcome Angelenos for a day of art, live jazz, special promotions from the neighborhood’s restaurants and cafes, and, of course, lots of healthy, brisk walking. Following the art walk, the MOCA Contemporaries will throw a bash at the elegant, historic Culver Hotel. Sat. Noon-8 p.m. (gallery tours), 6:30 p.m. (MOCA after-party). Free. Intersection of Washington and La Cienega boulevards. (310) 253-5716. ” target=”_blank”>http://kentwoodplayers.org.

SUN | JUNE 1

(DARFUR)
Jewish World Watch’s (JWW) promise to “not stand idly by” as genocide or other human rights violations take place around the world will be put to action this ” target=”_blank”>http://www.walkfordarfur.org.

(YIDDISHKAYT)
” border = 0 vspace = ‘8’ hspace = ‘8’ align = ‘left’>second year. Pulitzer Prize-winning foodie Jonathan Gold will be one of several celebrity judges taste-testing the hundreds of lokshn (noodle), bulbes (potato) and matze (matzah) versions expected to be entered in the carbalicious contest. Attendees get to nosh, enjoy live entertainment, record treasured food memories at an oral history video station and take part in the awards ceremony. Sun. 1 p.m. $10 (general admission includes three tastings). Additional tastings are $1 for two pieces. Participating kugel chefs receive free admission. Valley Cities Jewish Community Center, 13164 Burbank Blvd., Sherman Oaks. (213) 389-8880. ” target=”_blank”>http://www.yomtovart.com.

(BENEFIT GALA)
What better way to support Cedars-Sinai Medical Center’s Genetics Institute than to join your favorite athletes and entertainers during Cedars’ 23rd Annual Sports Spectacular. This year’s honorees include professional volleyball player Gabrielle Reece, L.A. Laker Derek Fisher and N.Y. Giant Michael Strahan. Snoop Dogg will light up the stage with other star-studded performances. Celebrity sightings aside, the event raised more than $17 million last year to further cutting-edge research into genetic disorders that affect children and adults, including mental retardation, dwarfism, deafness, malformation syndromes, as well as heart disease, hypertension and diabetes. Sun. 4-6:30 p.m. (silent auction and kids carnival), 6:30-9 p.m. (dinner and awards). $500. Hyatt Regency Century Plaza, 2025 Avenue of the Stars, Los Angeles. (310) 858-9217 or Calendar Girls picks and clicks for May 31-June 6 Read More »

Tales from the Crypt: Stonehenge an ancient cemetery

Photo

What’s a guy got to do to get a plot at Stonehenge?

At least part of the mystery of Stonehenge may have now been solved: it was from the beginning a monument to the dead.

New radiocarbon dates from human cremation burials in and around brooding stones on Salisbury Plain in England indicate that the site was used as a cemetery from 3000 B. C. well into its zenith around 2500 B.C., British archaeologists reported on Thursday.

What appeared to be the head of a stone mace, a symbol of authority, was found with one of the burials, the archaeologists said, indicating that this was probably a cemetery for the ruling dynasty responsible for erecting Stonehenge.

“It’s now clear that burials were a major component of Stonehenge in all its main stages,” said Mike Parker Pearson, an archaeologist at the University of Sheffield in England.

In a teleconference with reporters, arranged by the National Geographic Society, Dr. Parker Pearson described the three burials of burned bones and teeth that were dated in recent weeks. Researchers estimated that up to 240 people were buried there, all as cremation deposits. Other evidence from the British Isles shows that skeletal burials were rare at this time and that cremation was the custom for the elite.

Another Sheffield archaeologist, Andrew Chamberlain, noted one reason to think that Stonehenge burials were for generations of a single elite family. The clue, he said, is the small number of burials in the earliest period and the larger numbers in later centuries, as offspring would have multiplied.

Given the monumental surroundings, Dr. Parker Pearson said, “One has to assume anyone buried there had some good credentials.”

Tales from the Crypt: Stonehenge an ancient cemetery Read More »

Mother and daughter wave Israeli flag on trek to the top of Everest

The first mother-daughter team to reach the summit of Mount Everest waved an Israeli flag on their way to the top.

Cheryl Bart and her daughter Nikki of Sydney arrived atop the world’s highest mountain in the wee hours of May 24, Nepal time.

“I am at the top of the world,” Cheryl Bart radioed back to her colleagues at Everest Base Camp.

On Tuesday, a day after descending to the base camp, Cheryl Bart said by satellite phone, “It hasn’t really sunk in.”

She said the view from the summit — www.bigpondeverest.com — was awe-inspiring.

“Stepping up onto the roof of the world, my feeling was one of awe, silence and awe, that I was there,” Bart said. “It was a full moon, so when you lifted your head up you could see the reflection of the mountain. It was quite spectacular. The sun just started to rise over in Tibet, so the pink clouds and pink tops of these mighty mountains were awesome.”

Mother and daughter both are graduates of Moriah College, Australia’s largest Jewish school. Cheryl is a non-executive director of several companies in Australia as well as an ambassador of the Australian chapter of the Peres Center for Peace.

Nikki Bart, in her final year of medical school, is co-chair of the Medical Students’ Aid Project, which donates medical equipment and pharmaceuticals to Third World hospitals.

They are also the first mother-daughter duo to scale the peaks of the so-called seven summits — the highest mountains on each continent.

With a small flag of Israel in their backpack, the pair arrived in Nepal at the end of March, taking weeks to acclimate to the high altitude and bitter cold in preparation for temperatures that plunged to minus 30 degrees Celsius. They also had to overcome several setbacks during their ascent: the weather, nearby avalanches and high security when the Olympic torch was carried up the mountain.

On Tuesday, Cheryl Bart said she was looking forward to going home to Australia and new challenges beyond.

“We have to go home and we can’t wait to see family and friends, have more showers and eat ice cream,” she said. “But having reached the highest point on earth, we should probably go to the Dead Sea.”

Mother and daughter wave Israeli flag on trek to the top of Everest Read More »

After weeks of feuding over Mideast, candidates head to AIPAC conference

If there’s any doubt about AIPAC being the belle of Washington, check out next week’s ball.

The lobbying powerhouse’s conference, to be held June 2-4, is the only policy event since the presidential election campaign was launched that has attracted all three major candidates: U.S. Sens. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.).

The conference comes on the heels of a spate of Middle East-related dust-ups involving Obama and McCain.

They have engaged in a bruising battle over Iran policy. McCain favors increased isolation for Iran, Obama favors what he calls tough diplomacy and direct negotiations, and both are casting their arguments in terms of what’s better for Israel.

Those differences promise a lively conference. That’s fine, officials of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee said.

“They want to compete over who’s more pro-Israel?” one said. “Let them compete.”

Few holds have been barred in the fierce competition. McCain has supported President Bush’s contention before the Knesset earlier this month that directly dealing with Iran amounts to Nazi-era appeasement. Some administration aides described the remarks as a swipe at Obama’s position.

Democrats counter that what they call the “Bush-McCain” policy of not dealing with Iran has “made matters worse” for Israel, in the words of U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the speaker of the House of Representatives.

In addition, McCain and his surrogates have sought to score points by highlighting the fact that a Hamas official publicly praised Obama. The Democratic front-runner called such talk a “smear,” noting that he and McCain hold virtually identical positions on isolating the Palestinian terrorist group.

The candidates are unlikely to tamp things down in time for next week.

“Senator Obama will continue to describe his strong support for Israel’s security and the U.S.-Israel relationship, and his concern about how Israel’s security has not been enhanced by the current administration’s policies, and how his policies will advance U.S. national security interests and also Israel’s security,” said a senior aide to the candidate who asked not to be named.

Ann Lewis, a senior Clinton adviser, said, “This is like the Super Bowl for those of us who care about Israel and foreign policy. For Hillary it’s like having a conversation with old friends. There are so many people who will be at this meeting that she has known, that she has worked with, some of her best friends. She looks forward to it.”

Lewis did not have details of Clinton’s AIPAC speech, but said the candidate would likely emphasize her deep ties with the pro-Israel community.

“It will be very much about her commitment and her record, from Magen David Adom to the anti-Semitic language in the textbooks, to going to Israel and seeing the victims of terrorism in the hospitals,” she said.

Clinton was behind legislation that helped shepherd the Israeli first responder into the International Red Cross umbrella, and also backs tough scrutiny of Palestinian textbooks. Equally important, Lewis said, “would be the dangers posed by Iran.”

The McCain campaign did not respond in time for publication, but it seemed clear he also would not stint.

In a nuclear policy speech Tuesday in Denver, McCain subtly revived his contention that Obama is downplaying the Iran threat.

“We have seen Iran marching, marching with single-minded determination toward the same goal, authenticated again today by the IAEA,” the U.N. nuclear regulatory body, McCain said at the outset. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, he continued, “has threatened to wipe Israel off the face of the earth, and represents a threat to every country in the region — one we cannot ignore or minimize.”

For her part, Clinton counts the pro-Israel community as a redoubt of support in her increasingly unlikely bid to claim the Democratic nomination and has made clear she will not cede it. In the last debate with Obama, Clinton said she would “obliterate” the Iranian regime should it launch a nuclear strike against Israel.

The trio of candidates isn’t the only draw to what promises to be a crowded three days: Defending the Bush administration in its waning days will be Condoleezza Rice, the secretary of state. The leaders of both parties in both houses of Congress also plan to speak.

It marks a pleasant change for AIPAC, which has been dogged in recent years by critics who have accused the lobby of helping the Bush administration win support for the Iraq war, even though lawmakers have denied repeatedly that AIPAC played any role in rallying congressional backing for the war.

It is also the first policy conference since last summer, when AIPAC agreed in principle to continue to fund the defense of two former staffers facing trial for dealing in classified information, removing at least partially the opprobrium that the group had abandoned two loyal soldiers.

More substantially, AIPAC is scoring major lobbying successes in Congress. A bill under consideration that would create certification to show that Israel is maintaining a qualitative military edge in the region already has garnered major support.

And while the Democrat-controlled Congress and Bush are deadlocked over just about every major budget issue, lobbyists at AIPAC are confident that Congress will adopt the president’s plan this year to start increasing assistance to Israel from an average of $2.4 billion annually to $3 billion.

The policy forum’s highlight is its dinner June 3 at the cavernous Washington convention center, which organizers say is the largest seated meal in the nation’s capital. AIPAC leaders call out the roster of lawmakers in attendance and usually garner a bipartisan majority of both houses, underscoring the group’s main point: support for Israel crosses the aisle.

Partisanship can raise its head, and did so a year ago when Vice President Dick Cheney and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert both called for Jewish support for the Iraq war — and when Pelosi earned scattered boos for decrying the war.

An AIPAC spokesman said such manifestations are marginal.

After weeks of feuding over Mideast, candidates head to AIPAC conference Read More »