fbpx

April 3, 2008

Where the booklovers are

art_dutton-doug_040408.jpg


Dutton’s Brentwood Books, among the best-known and best-loved of Los Angeles’ independent bookstores, will close on April 30.

It is hard not to take this as a sign of the times.

Over the past few years many local independent bookstores have gone the
way of the local movie theater, the local hardware store and the local
stationery shop — disappearing — as much victims of a changed retail
and commercial real estate environment as a victim of our changing
consumer and lifestyle habits (more on that later).

All my favorite haunts of my post-grad years in New York have vanished:
Books & Co., the Madison Bookstore, Canterbury Books, Shakespeare
& Co. In Beverly Hills, no general bookstore remains, only
Taschen’s retail outlet. In Santa Monica, we have lost bookstores big
(Crown) and small (The Book Nook in the country mart).

However, to paraphrase Shakespeare, that best-selling author, we have come not to bury Dutton’s but to recall the good times.

First some history: Doug Dutton’s parents were booksellers and ran
Dutton’s in North Hollywood, which Doug’s brother, Davis Dutton, took
over after them (and then closed in early 2006). Doug Dutton opened the
Brentwood location in 1984.

Dutton’s extends across several different rooms on the ground floor of
a two-story building on San Vicente Boulevard, and at its heart is a
central courtyard that seems tailor-made for readings and book parties.
The site also provides ample parking behind the building (an important
draw in Los Angeles).

The two-story U-shaped building, with its stairways lining the central
courtyard, have always reminded me of those Bauhaus-style structures
that dot Tel Aviv and are meant to express a functionality in harmony
with the Mediterranean climate and an indoor/outdoor lifestyle. How
toddlers love those stairs! How parents eyed them nervously!

Duttton’s itself occupies almost 5,000 square feet. The main room, on
the west side of the building, is filled with literature, mysteries and
current non-fiction in both hardcover and paperback. To the north is
housed the non-fiction, as well as music offerings and audio books; to
the east are the children’s room, the travel books and cookbooks, and
the gift and stationery items and, a relatively recent addition, a cafe.

The whole place always had a ramshackle feel, with frayed carpets and
crowded shelves. Each area is its own empire, and one felt free to
wander among them, and trusted to take a book from one area to the
other without being accused of running off. The staff has always been
friendly, knowledgeable and, on occasion, eccentric (Dutton’s had a
staff poet in Scott Wannberg).

Oh the book signings and parties I’ve attended at Dutton’s! Lots of
white wine and cheese cubes under the bridge. Dutton’s was a place
where you went to support your friends, to buy copies of their books,
to hear them read. I recall attending events for friends such as
(alphabetically) Robert Cohen, Roger Director, Seth Greenland, Mona
Simpson and Deanne Stillman (and those are just ones I remember).
Dutton’s was a place you took your out-of-town friends to show them
what Los Angeles had to offer in book culture. It was where you took
your author friends to ask Dutton to let them sign copies of their
books. It was a place you went to get a peek at your writing idols when
they came to town.

I myself had one or two book events at Dutton’s, and the feeling of
sitting behind the counter and looking out at a room of friends and
readers crowded between the display tables was a heart-warming sight
for any author. It made a writer feel, for a long moment, part of a
community.

Dutton’s was old school: I had a house account there that allowed me to
sign for books for which I was billed monthly; my 10-year-old daughter
had signing privileges on my account. I had imagined the day would come
when she would have her own account, but that is not to be. (This
reminds of the time my father was approached about buying a “lifetime
membership to a health club,” and he replied, “My lifetime, or your
company’s?” He outlived that business by several decades.) So it goes.

No more stopping by on a Saturday afternoon to wander among the display
tables, to run into friends, to discuss new books, to recommend
favorites. No more going to get a signed first edition of a friend’s
new work (talk about an author’s heartbreak: Mark Sarvas was scheduled
to read from his new novel, “Harry, Revised,” at Dutton’s in early May;
Dutton’s closing on April 30 forecloses that, as well).

Which brings me to Dutton’s closing — who to blame and what to do about it?

Dutton's.jpg


One could blame a world in which handbags regularly sell for more than
$1,000, where coffee can cost more than $4 a cup and a tart frozen
yogurt is a $5 treat as explaining a retail environment that demands a
greater return than books can deliver. Or an inflated real-estate
market that calls on developers to achieve a greater return than the
current structure can deliver — but Doug Dutton himself will tell you
that the developer who owns the building, Charles Munger, who plans to
redevelop the property into something more high-rent, is not the
villain here. From Dutton’s announcement of his store’s closing:

“Given our
situation as it now stands, the pride we feel in our past achievements,
and the vagaries of the current book market, shuttering our doors seems
the only realistic solution. It is important to note that Charles
Munger has committed to a significant amount of financial support for
the difficult process of closing the store, and we appreciate his
generosity.”

In 2004,
Dutton’s opened a Beverly Hills branch with incentives from that city,
but when those conditions changed, the bookstore could not continue and
closed at the end of 2006. More than anything, it was the difficulty of
being a bookseller in the current marketplace.

I remember a conversation with the owner of the Book Nook before it
closed. He told me that people’s habits have changed. Today, the
majority of bestsellers are purchased for 40 percent off at Wal-Mart or
Costco. The small book that becomes a success because of independent
bookstores has become as rare as the independent movie that succeeds by
word-of-mouth — it happens, just not often enough to sustain a
business.

There continue to be, and there will be continue to be, great
independent bookstores in Los Angeles, from Skylight Books in Los Feliz
and Book Soup in West Hollywood to Village Books in the Palisades and
Equator Books in Venice.

However, this is the way we live now: If you want to see a busy
bookstore, go to an airport. The enemy, as Pogo said, is us. I need
only look to my own buying habits. If there’s a book that I know I
want, either a new title or an obscure one, I will often buy it from
Amazon.com or AbeBooks.com. I spend a certain amount of time browsing
at Borders or Barnes & Noble, but I can’t tell you the last time
that I bought a book there because of a bookseller’s recommendation (at
press time, Border’s has put itself up for sale). Times change, customs
and behavior changes and Dutton’s is just one sign.

I stopped by Dutton’s this week, and while I won’t go as far as to call
it a shiva visit, as I crossed the courtyard I spied two successful TV
writers bemoaning Dutton’s closing. Seeing Doug Dutton, one woman got
teary, talking about how she had grown up with Dutton’s and what the
loss of the bookstore and its community means to her.

Which brings me to another point. Dutton’s, like any good independent
bookstore, represented more than a retail enterprise, and its closing
affects our quality of life. The question then becomes one of whether
we could change the market reality of bookstores. Can we instead
protect, encourage, support and value those aspects of places like
Dutton’s that mean so much to us?

Where will we go to get that sense of community, that feeling of being
in a place where books are a valued part of our culture? Where can I
take my daughter to imbue her with that same sense?

In a world where the bookstore is less and less viable, where do we go
to find like-minded others of all ages who enjoy books and other
cultural delivery systems such as graphic novels, comic books, games,
videos and CDs? Where can we go to see and hold in our hands not only
current titles but also a long tail of widely diverse offerings —
where will we find knowledgeable guides to help us find what we are
looking for or make suggestions? Where can we go to see our literary
idols?

Perhaps Dutton’s closing is a sign of our times. I will miss it, and we
— our community, our city, our world — are the poorer for its loss.
Perhaps the bookstore is no longer commercially viable. But we need not
abandon the bookstore experience.

Again, I can only turn to my own experience. I will tell you where I go: To the public library.

Recently I stood at a display case in the Beverly Hills Public Library
reading original copies of letters written by Dashiell Hammett, James
M. Cain and F. Scott Fitzgerald. Last week, I was at the Central
Library to hear Richard Price talk about his new novel “Lush Life.”

Perhaps when Dutton’s closes we need not feel we’ve lost all we value.

Have you visited the Santa Monica Public Library’s new main branch? Not
only is it airy and comfortable with plenty of parking, not only is
there a great kids area that has books and computers with games, but
for those who got used to associating a bookstore with noshing, it also
houses a great and reasonably priced cafe.

Stephen Schwartzman of Blackstone Group recently announced a $100
million gift to the New York Public library — a rare but inspired
gift. More often the case these days is the library that is laying off
staff and is hard-up to buy new books. Those that thrive do so with
community support. It will take more donations and public support to
libraries and “friends of the library” groups to keep our cultural
communities strong. However, if the marketplace can’t support
bookstores, and we still believe that books bring people together, we
will all have to do our part to affirm the value in people coming
together in a place that values books.

Tom Teicholz is a film producer in Los Angeles. Everywhere else,
he’s an author and journalist who has written for The New York Times
Sunday Magazine, Interview and The Forward. His column appears every
other week.

Where the booklovers are Read More »

How Tinseltown shaped the world’s view of the Holocaust

Hollywood movies and television have shaped the way most of the world perceives the Final Solution, narrator Gene Hackman observes at the beginning of “Imaginary Witness: Hollywood and the Holocaust.”

It is a statement that may not sit too well with generations of historians and authors, but the evidence validates the conclusion.

When the NBC mini-series “Holocaust” aired in 1978, one of every two Americans watched. The effect was even stronger in Germany, where the film, with an assist from the Wiesenthal Center, persuaded the German government to cancel the time limit on the prosecution of Nazi war criminals.

Elie Wiesel might heatedly object that the TV series, and indeed all dramatic representations, “trivialized” the extermination of the Six Million, and that only those who actually survived the concentration camps had a right to speak.

He was answered, indirectly, by the sardonic German joke of the time that the television “Holocaust” had more of an impact on the German mind than had the original.

As a documentary, “Imaginary Witness” does a remarkable job of presenting the history and moral ambiguities in Hollywood’s treatment of the Holocaust, from the early Nazi days to “The Pianist,” and the chapter is far from closed.

The studios, headed mostly by Jewish immigrants conflicted about their identity, generally treated the new Nazi rulers of Germany with kid gloves. In this, they were driven as much by the bottom line (in the 1920s, Germany accounted for 10 percent of Hollywood’s foreign profits) as by the Hays Code. This self-censorship code protected audiences not only from excessive cleavage but also mandated that movies could not demean the people or rulers of a foreign country.

One exception to the general timidity was MGM’s “The Mortal Storm” (1940), about the persecution of a Jewish family. Though the word “Jew” was never uttered, with “non-Aryan” serving as a substitute, Goebbels banned all future MGM films from both Germany and occupied Europe.


‘Jewish’ excerpt, Charlie Chaplin’s ‘The Great Dictator’

“Jew” was first spoken on the screen later, in 1940, in “The Great Dictator,” which could be made only because Charlie Chaplin financed and produced the brilliant satire by himself.

Hollywood’s appeasement didn’t save it from retribution. The U.S. Senate’s Nye Committee investigated the “Jewish conspiracy” to slander Germany, and Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, warned the nervous Jewish moguls that they would be held responsible if America were drawn into war.

All that changed on Dec. 7, 1941 with the attack on Pearl Harbor, and Hollywood was harnessed to the war effort, with Warner Bros. leading the way with the Looney Tunes cartoon “The Ducktators.”

The first real inkling the American public had of the Holocaust was through newsreel footage of the liberation of the death camps, but the Cold War courtship of Germany and the heavy hand of the McCarthy era discouraged any follow-ups.

While “Crossfire” and “Gentleman’s Agreement” broke new ground in probing anti-Semitism in America, neither film alluded to the Holocaust.

Finally, in 1959, a sanitized version of “The Diary of Anne Frank” began to deal directly with the fate of European Jewry, followed in the same year by the Playhouse 90 TV production of “Judgment in Nuremberg” (in which this reviewer launched and closed out his acting career).

By the 1980s and early ’90s, movies reached a new level of realism and depth with “Sophie’s Choice” and ABC’s 30-hour “War and Remembrance,” crowned by “Schindler’s List.”

Director Daniel Anker of “Imaginary Witness,” the son of German Jewish refugees, augments clips from 20 films by introducing some astute analysts, foremost among them Holocaust scholar Michael Berenbaum and author Neal Gabler, and leading filmmakers, to discuss the moral complexities of dealing with Holocaust themes.

Both Sidney Lumet (“The Pawnbroker”) and Steven Spielberg (“Schindler’s List”) acknowledge their fear of seeming to exploit the immense tragedy.

Berenbaum notes that in many such films, the viewer is guided to identify neither with the Jewish victim nor the Nazi perpetrator, but rather with the good gentile who helps the Jews.

Despite Hollywood’s shortcomings, Berenbaum concludes, “in a relative world, these films have set for the world a standard of absolute evil.”

“Imaginary Witness” opens April 4 at Laemmle’s Town Center 5 in Encino and Grande 4-Plex in downtown Los Angeles. For more information, visit http://www.shadowdistribution.com and http://www.laemmle.com

How Tinseltown shaped the world’s view of the Holocaust Read More »

Theater: A generation’s history, one life at time

“Showing Our Age” is a play about stories, and the fact that everyone has one. It’s a project that I started more than 10 years ago, though not specifically as an idea for a play. I was a participant in a community outreach program in which we interviewed senior citizens, used their remarkable life stories to write monologues and then performed them for the seniors and their families. The simplicity of just the details of a life — without sets or costumes — created some of the most powerful theater I had ever been involved with. And I have been involved in theater for a very long time, as an actress, writer, director and teacher. I wanted more! I wanted to take this idea and expand it.

That was when About Productions, a Los Angeles-based theater company I had worked with before, became involved. They supported the idea ” target=”_blank”>http://www.aboutpd.org/

Theater: A generation’s history, one life at time Read More »

David’s the singer, he’s the rapper

Oded Turgeman, director of the new short film “Song of David,” doesn’t do things the easy way.

As a burgeoning film director, he applied to Jerusalem’s most prestigious film school, with a commander in a combat unit as his only prior life experience. Then he moved to America to attend the American Film Institute — the first Orthodox Jew ever to enroll there — and, because of his Sabbath observance, had to shoot and produce each of his four thesis films in two days, not the usual three.

And when the deadline for AFI’s short-film contest was two weeks away — this was the night before Passover 2006 — and most applicants had worked on their proposals for months, Turgeman was struck with inspiration for the film that would, nearly two years later, become “Song of David.”

“It was accepted by the committee,” Turgeman said, laughing. “It was an impossible thing, but they accepted it.”

He secured a shooting location in Yeshiva Ohr Elchonon near Hancock Park and a star in the rapper Niz (real name: Nosson Zand), who flew to Los Angeles to meet Turgeman. Despite his lack of experience (truly: Zand had never acted before), Turgeman was immediately convinced he was the right Chasid for the part. For Niz, a ba’al teshuvah who had been Orthodox for only a few years, landing the role of David was a coup.

“I tell people that David is a yeshiva bocher who wants to be a rapper, whereas I am a rapper who wants to be a yeshiva bocher,” he said.

As for the film itself, it would be tempting to describe “Song of David” as a straight-up Orthodox hip-hop movie, if such a thing existed. The truth is, it’s much more complicated. The film is a study of its titular character’s struggle: the struggle to be a good Jew and a good artist.

From the start, the movie dwells firmly in iconic imagery. The opening credits fade from black into the striking blue water of a ritual bath, with a man in his early 20s dunking himself beneath the water. From there, the film places Niz in terse, bleak scenes, light on words and heavy with intended meaning, of David being scorned by other yeshiva students, of him standing on the yeshiva rooftop and writing verses.

The paradigm of David’s character — a Chasidic Jew who can find solace only in hip-hop music — is hardly a unique occurrence in today’s real-life Chasidic world, where professional masters of ceremonies like Y-Love and Matisyahu use music as a way of both self-expression and proselytization, and bands that sound like MTV clones play to packed auditoriums of single-sex audiences.

But the clash of hip-hop and Chasidic cultures is still such a striking study in oppositions, especially to non-Orthodox audiences, that the film is almost forced to traffic in these stark, hard-hitting images in order to get through to the audience: the black-and-white clothes, the bearded face nodding in time to rhymes, the traditional wordless niggun hummed over vocal beatboxing. (The film’s soundtrack features Ta-Shma, a hip-hop duo based in Brooklyn’s Crown Heights who contribute both original songs and music from their 2006 album, “Come Listen.”)

To shoot the film, Turgeman had to wait nearly a full year, until Passover 2007 — the only time that the yeshiva was out of session.

“The catering alone was a nightmare,” Turgeman recalled. “Even though 95 percent of the crew was not Jewish, all the food had to be Kehila kosher. And it was a week before Passover. It was really tough. But we withstood it.”

In order to meet with the yeshiva’s demands, all the women on the set had to wear skirts, and married women, even non-Jewish ones, were asked to cover their hair. But those restrictions were easy compared with the ones imposed by the film’s star. After becoming Orthodox and going through the yeshiva system himself, Niz was wary of getting involved in any sort of film, especially one in which he’s first seen underwater and shirtless inside a ritual bath. To film that scene, all female crewmembers were asked to leave the room, including the cinematographer.

“The [bath] shot was one of the more questionable moments that I encountered,” Niz said, although “eventually, the scene gained the approval of a local rabbi whom I both trust and respect.”

With production completed, Turgeman is now taking the film on a festival tour. In March, “David” had its L.A. premiere, as well as a screening at the prestigious AFI Dallas International Film Festival, one of the preliminary screenings that leads to Oscar qualification. Turgeman and his screenwriter are working on a full-length adaptation.

In the meantime, though, Niz is back to his first love, hip-hop. “I don’t know if I’d act in another film,” he said. “I believe as a Jew that many things in this world can be used for both good and bad. I viewed this movie as an opportunity to spiritually elevate the film industry.”

This article originally appeared in The Forward (www.forward.com) and is reprinted with permission.

David’s the singer, he’s the rapper Read More »