fbpx

June 1, 2006

Shoes Carry Life

I walk along the cold, unforgiving ground.
I try.
I try to think of life.
I see the bodies of life around me, but I can’t feel it.
I can’t help it,
I can only think of the bodies that lie where I stand.
Faces come towards me.
Unfamiliar faces of my sisters and brothers.
Red, cold faces.
Never have faces faced one another here.
Never have they looked both ways.
Life was one way.
Death was one way.
My shoes carry life, but feel death.
They walk, stiffly, boldly, ignorantly.
Their brothers and sisters lie here, never again to carry life.
They continue to walk.
Stop!
They walk.
Stop!
Look!
They continue, unable to see death.
Unable to feel death.
They walk only to carry life.

This poem played out in my head as I walked toward the mass graves in the Tykocin Forest in Poland, and as I reached one of the graves, I sat against a tree and wrote it down. I needed my feelings to escape. I needed to say how I felt, but I could not speak. Before we entered the forest, the staff from the Intergenerational March of the Living, sponsored by the Bureau of Jewish Education, had given us drawings of different shoes and asked us to imagine, as we walked through these forests, the people who walked here before us, but were unable to walk out. Walking out — that was surreal.

I have grown up listening to my grandparents’ stories, studying the history, reading the literature and seeing the pictures. I have become familiar with the atrocities and images of the Holocaust. But I cannot describe the way I felt seeing the infamous sign, “Arbeit Macht Frei” on the gate of Auschwitz in color and from inside the gate, instead of outside of it. As 8,000 Jewish teenagers, adults and Holocaust survivors marched under it and out of Auschwitz last month, I felt feelings of victory, of defiance, of triumph and of survival. I knew that millions of victims had walked through this gate, not knowing the fate that awaited them, but very few were able to walk back out. This time, however, the survivors of Auschwitz and the teens from our delegation walked hand-in-hand to Birkenau on a march of life, not death.

Before beginning the march, Ilan Graff, one of our amazing staff members, told us that while on the march we should respect its sanctity and meaning, and observe certain modes of behavior, such as no speaking and no photography. I completely agreed with them. After we walked out of Auschwitz, I walked alone, very disturbed by all of the talking, laughing and picture-taking that was going on around me. I wanted this march to be solemn; I wanted the teens around me to remember, as I was, and not to turn this march into a stroll. I continued to walk silently until a group from Panama marched up behind me singing “Am Yisrael Chai!” That’s when I realized that this march was supposed to be about remembrance, but it was not supposed to be a march of death. It was a march of the living, and for the living. We were here to remember those who perished, but more so, to celebrate our survival and our perseverance. Three generations walked hand-in-hand and side-by-side from Auschwitz to Birkenau, but this time, we were not being told to march; rather, it was our turn to tell the world that we will march and stand and live, always together, always forever. Am Israel Chai!

And then I took pictures. I tried to fight it; I tried to just experience it, but I knew that I was so lucky to have come on this trip, and that it was now my responsibility and my honor to tell the stories of my journey and of our survivors’ journeys. I knew that if I did not document what I was seeing — 8,000 Jewish people walking from Auschwitz to Birkenau, carrying flags from their respective countries and wearing Israeli flags with pride — I would never be able to describe the experience. I took pictures, I sang with other groups, I listened to the voices around me, and I walked with our survivors. We walked. We all walked together, 8,000 of us. We marched from Auschwitz to Birkenau in song, in remembrance, in pride, in hope.

Our shoes — now they truly carry life.

Arielle Feit participated in the 2006 Los Angeles Intergenerational March of the Living, sponsored by the Bureau of Jewish Education in collaboration with The Jewish Federation Tel Aviv-Los Angeles Partnership and Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles. For more information, please visit this story online at www.jewishjournal.com. l

Arielle Feit is a senior at Milken Community High School.

Shoes Carry Life Read More »

Marriage Conversion Rate Proves Low

Low conversion rates among intermarried Jewish families continue to plague those working to reverse the demographic downtrends in American Jewry.

Fewer than one-fifth of non-Jews who marry Jews convert to Judaism, according to a new study distributed by the American Jewish Committee.

The “Choosing Jewish” report, which interviewed 94 mixed-marriage couples and nine Jewish professionals in the Boston and Atlanta areas, also painted a bleak picture of Jewish involvement for those who do convert.

Many converted Jews — 40 percent — are described as “accommodating Jews-by-Choice.” They come to Judaism because they are asked to do so, and allow others to determine their level of Jewish observance, the report said. Jews in this category often have profiles of Jewish involvement similar to moderately affiliated born Jews.

Another 30 percent of converted Jews are identified as ambivalent Jews — they continue to express doubts about their conversion and feel guilty about beliefs or holidays left behind, according to the report. Their children mirror this ambivalence by thinking of themselves as half-Jews.

The report qualified only 30 percent of converted spouses as “activist Jews,” or those who identify deeply with the Jewish people and Israel. These Jews often are more committed to Jewish practice than are born Jews, and their children are virtually indistinguishable from children whose parents were born Jewish.

The findings, compiled by Brandeis University professor Sylvia Barack Fishman, have widespread implications for a community grappling with the reality of mixed marriages.

According to both the 2000-2001 National Jewish Population Survey and surveys by Gary Tobin, president of the San Francisco-based Institute for Jewish & Community Research, the U.S. Jewish intermarriage rate is between 40 percent and 50 percent.

The American Jewis Committee (AJCommittee) hopes the new data will create a road map for greater Jewish involvement among converts and intermarried families.

The breakdown of converted Jews by category shows that we should “not treat converts as an undifferentiated mass,” said Steven Bayme, the AJCommittee’s director of contemporary Jewish life.

Instead, he envisioned a sliding scale of Jewish involvement, ranging from those with a low level of affiliation to those who are highly involved.

“We should not see conversion as the end of the story,” he said. “What we’re really aiming for is converts who enrich the Jewish community through Jewish activism. We need to enlarge the pool of activist converts.”

But that requires a proactive approach.

First and foremost, Jews need to “wave the banner of inmarriage,” advocating Jewish partners whenever possible, he said. In cases of intermarriage, Bayme described conversion as “the single best outcome.”

“We need to be up front about our preference for conversion,” he said.

To that end, he talked about the role of rabbi as the “nurturer of would-be converts” and the need for Jewish family members to “be clear about values and objectives.”

In addition, Bayme advocated raising children in an exclusively Jewish household, because attempting to combine religions would be “a disaster Jewishly.”

Edmund Case, publisher of Interfaithfamily.com, which encourages Jewish connections in the interfaith community, took issue with several of these premises.

“I think there is a real danger in promoting conversion too aggressively,” he said. “If we stand at the door, a lot of people might not come in.”

Case said that accepting intermarried non-Jews who don’t convert — not just those who do — should be paramount.

“The way to have more Jewish children is for interfaith couples to get involved in Jewish life,” he said. “It’s important to see intermarriage as an opportunity and not as a negative or a loss.

“I think its important to communicate a message of welcome,” he continued. “The message we need to send to [intermarried] non-Jews is, ‘We’re grateful to you and happy to have you just as you are.'”

Case criticized the lack of money allocated to such interfaith outreach — less than $3 million a year between Jewish federations and family foundations, he said.

Bayme said “it’s a bit premature” for the AJCommittee to recommend any policy changes based on the report but that the group will discuss the findings at several upcoming meetings.

 

Marriage Conversion Rate Proves Low Read More »

Conservatives Focus on Intermarrieds

Stephen Lachter didn’t know what to expect when a friend dragged him to a men’s club meeting at his Conservative synagogue five years ago.

“My father was in a men’s club, and to me, it was guys sitting around playing pinochle and volunteer ushering,” he admitted.

Instead, Lachter was surprised to see “interesting people having serious discussions,” and he “fell into a session on kiruv,” or outreach, to intermarried families. “I said to myself, this is something shuls need to be talking about.”

Today, Lachter is a kiruv consultant, a lay leader trained to reach out to intermarried families in his Washington congregation. He’s part of a nationwide program run by the Conservative movement’s Federation of Jewish Men’s Clubs, which is aimed at making Conservative synagogues more welcoming to their non-Jewish members.

The initiative comes at a time when the Conservative movement is concerned about declining numbers. The Federation of Jewish Men’s Clubs has consistently been ahead of the Conservative movement in reaching out to the intermarried.

That groundwork is bearing fruit. Last December at its biennial convention, the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism announced its own kiruv initiative, advocating a more open attitude toward members’ non-Jewish spouses, while still holding conversion as the preferred goal.

The document, which has been distributed to Conservative congregations around the country, doesn’t go as far as the Men’s Club kiruv initiative, but it’s a big step in the right direction, said Rabbi Chuck Simon, executive director of the Federation of Jewish Men’s Clubs.

“Four years ago, we set our goal to put kiruv on the Conservative movement agenda within five years. We did it in three and a half,” he said.

In the past three years, the Men’s Club organization has held seven training seminars for lay leaders and now has close to 40 kiruv consultants working in Conservative congregations around the country. The consultants set up kiruv committees at their synagogues and organize discussion groups with intermarried couples, their parents and grandparents.

At Kiruv consultant Lachter’s congregation, “people have come out of the woodwork,” he said. “How do you talk to your child who is interdating? We don’t have that language. How do grandparents deal with their grandchildren, teaching them what Judaism is without treading on toes?”

The Federation of Jewish Men’s Clubs also has organized rabbinic seminars for interested Conservative rabbis on the assumption that kiruv consultants have to work closely with their rabbis to be effective. More than 120 rabbis have taken part in such seminars, including about 30 at a gathering held recently at Berkeley’s Congregation Netivot Shalom.

In its April 2006 edition, the federation’s Kiruv Initiative states its position as “in favor of conversion if possible,” while recognizing that many non-Jewish spouses “lead Jewish lives and raise Jewish families” even if they don’t convert themselves.

“The [federation] favors meeting these people where they are and assisting them in making Jewish choices,” the document concludes.

That’s a subtle distinction from the United Synagogue position. Rabbi Jerome Epstein, the United Synagogue’s executive vice president, spoke diplomatically about the federation approach.

“Anything one can do to encourage people to identify more clearly as Jews is good,” he said. “It’s not the approach we’re using, but it’s hard to be against an attempt to reach out to people.”

Rabbinic and lay training seminars are planned for Cincinnati and Anaheim in November, with more to follow next spring. This winter, the federation will begin an online evaluation of cultural change in the congregations taking part in the program.

At the Berkeley gathering, some of the rabbis, including Netivot Shalom’s Rabbi Stuart Kelman, were part of the Tiferet Project, a four-year effort that culminated with last year’s publication of “A Place in the Tent,” a booklet that urges the Conservative movement to adopt a more welcoming attitude toward intermarried families.

“For me, it’s not even a question,” Kelman said of the kiruv consultant idea. “One of the reasons there’s no bimah in my congregation is I’m trying to create a congregation that is accessible. I don’t think the rabbis can do it themselves; the best way to create cultural change is to empower lay people.”

Many of the rabbis have practical concerns: Their members are intermarrying, and they don’t want to lose them.

Rabbi Chai Levy of Marin County’s Congregation Kol Shofar in Tiburon noted that the most recent statistics in the county show that 90 percent of children ages 2-5 in families that identify as Jewish have a non-Jewish parent.

“The future of my congregation is, obviously, intermarried couples,” she said. “I have to think seriously about these people.”

 

Conservatives Focus on Intermarrieds Read More »

Trouble Mars Pope’s Trip to Auschwitz

Eleven years ago, at ceremonies marking the 50th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz-Birkenau, misunderstandings between Poles and Jews ran so deep that even a rabbi’s desire to say the Mourner’s Kaddish reportedly disturbed some Polish politicians.

In fact, there were so many debates over the tenor of the event that two separate ceremonies were held: one for Jews, the other arranged by the Polish government.

At last Sunday’s visit by Pope Benedict XVI, not only was Kaddish recited, but a whole new Catholic sensitivity to Jews was on display — even as Poland struggles to battle xenophobia and anti-Semitism, sometimes from Catholic sources.

When meeting former inmate Henrik Mandelbaum, who was forced to burn the bodies of his fellow Jews in the Birkenau crematoria, the normally reserved Benedict kissed him on both cheeks.

Poland’s chief rabbi, U.S.-born Michael Schudrich, said Kaddish in the presence of the pope and the country’s top elected leaders, and recalled those non-Jews who risked their lives to save Jews from the gas chambers.

Forced in his native Germany to join the Hitler Youth as a teen, Benedict said: “The rulers of the Third Reich wanted to crush the entire Jewish people, to cancel it from the register of the peoples of the earth.”

But Schudrich noted that the pope “stopped short of decrying anti-Semitism, and although his visit was a wonderful gesture to us all, not mentioning anti-Semitism was a glaring omission.”

The chief rabbi’s sentiments were echoed by a number of Jewish observers, including Auschwitz survivor Kalman Sultanik and Rabbi Andrew Baker, director of international affairs for the American Jewish Committee.

The pope’s visit came at a time when Polish-Jewish relations are soaring. The country has the largest number of and best-attended Jewish festivals in Europe, countless Catholic-Jewish initiatives and massive government financial support for the Museum of the History of Polish Jews, expected to open in Warsaw in 2009.

However, the specter of anti-Semitism has not been erased in the country that was home to one of the world’s largest Jewish communities before World War II.

Less than one month ago, an extreme-right Catholic party whose politicians have a long history of anti-Jewish and anti-gay positions joined the coalition government at the request of Prime Minister Kazimierz Marcinkiewicz.

The League of Polish Families is presided over by Roman Giertych, the country’s new minister of education. Giertych is formerly head of the All-Polish Youth, whose members have been photographed giving the Nazi salute, according to media reports. The league has its roots in the National Democratic movement, which advocated violence against Jews in the 1930s and was led by Giertych’s grandfather.

In dozens of interviews, Jews and non-Jews said they worry that Giertych’s rise had empowered the small segment of Polish society that is intolerant and xenophobic.

Several high-profile acts of anti-Semitism leading up to the pope’s visit upset Poland’s Jewish community, estimated at up to 10,000 in a country of 38 million.

Schudrich was, for the first time in his 15 years in the country, assaulted Saturday coming out of synagogue, when a man hit him in the face and attacked him with pepper spray, shouting, “Poland is for Poles.”

The previous Shabbat, some young men shouted anti-Semitic slogans at the rabbi and other worshippers.

Schudrich connected the ascension of Giertych and the league, which garnered 8 percent of the vote in the 2005 parliamentary elections, with these events and other recent incidents, including anti-Jewish threats sent by text message to Jewish student leaders and the stabbing of an anti-fascist by skinheads in Warsaw.

“There is a price to letting in extreme rightists into the government. It empowers xenophobic, homophobic and anti-Semitic members of society,” Schudrich said.

 

Trouble Mars Pope’s Trip to Auschwitz Read More »

Abbas’ Move Challenges Olmert

As Prime Minister Ehud Olmert presses ahead with plans for another unilateral withdrawal from the West Bank, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is determined not to be sidelined by Olmert’s go-it-alone approach.

In late May, as Olmert tried to convince President Bush of the need for unilateral action, Abbas urged the Hamas-led Palestinian government to accept a package that would enable the Palestinians to break out of diplomatic isolation and emerge as full-fledged negotiating partners with a say on Olmert’s pullback plans.

The vehicle Abbas hopes to use to regain international legitimacy is an agreement hammered out between Palestinian prisoners from Hamas, being held by Israel, and his own Fatah organization, calling for the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. The so-called “prisoners’ covenant” is based on the Saudi-initiated peace plan of 2002, which received widespread international support at the time.

As of May 26, Abbas gave Hamas 10 days to accept the package.

If not, he says he will go to the Palestinian people and ask them to approve the prisoners’ covenant in a referendum within six weeks. Should the Palestinians accept the covenant, analysts believe there could be strong international pressure on Israel to engage in peace talks on the basis of the Saudi plan. In this way, they say, Abbas hopes to re-establish the Palestinians as players and undercut Olmert’s unilateralism.

But it won’t be easy.

Hamas leaders have already rejected the plan and question Abbas’ constitutional right to call a referendum. Moreover, without Hamas’ compliance, Abbas may not have the power to stage and secure a nationwide ballot, even though most Palestinians seem to want one. Latest polls show that between 70 percent and 80 percent of Palestinians favor a referendum.

The Saudi plan is based on a “land for peace” formula. It stipulates that if Israel withdraws from all territory gained in the 1967 Six-Day War, all the Arab states will normalize their relations with Israel. Hamas, however, continues to reject anything that implies recognition of the Jewish state.

The radical movement’s leaders also reject other key elements of the “prisoners’ covenant.”

For example, they refuse to be bound by previous Israeli-Palestinian agreements and insist on the right of Palestinians to use force against Israel, not only in the disputed territories, but in Israel proper as well.

Abbas has evolved several strategies to overcome Hamas intransigence. One is the planned referendum. Another is the establishment of a national-unity Hamas-Fatah government in which he, as the senior Fatah representative, would be empowered to conduct negotiations with Israel, not only as the president, but in the name of the government as a whole.

Then there is the ultimate weapon: Abbas could dissolve the Hamas-dominated Parliament and call new elections.

If he manages to get the Palestinian people and polity to commit to the Saudi plan, Abbas will create a major dilemma for the international community.

On the one hand, senior American and European officials are highly skeptical about the Palestinian president’s ability to deliver. They note that in the three years since the formulation of the internationally approved “road map” peace plan, Abbas has done virtually nothing to implement it, and doubt whether things would be different with the Saudi plan.

On the other hand, both the Americans and Europeans would much prefer a negotiated settlement to unilateral moves by Israel, which they fear might spark more fighting rather than less.

Olmert is not only skeptical about Abbas. He also has deep reservations about the Saudi plan, which calls for withdrawal to the 1967 lines, without Israel retaining any of the large settlement blocs he wants to keep.

Moreover, the Saudi formula insists on eastern Jerusalem as the capital of the projected Palestinian state and it suggests that Israel would have to accept the Palestinian refugees’ right of return — positions Olmert rejects out of hand.

The prime minister, therefore, hopes to keep the Saudi plan off the international agenda. He plans visits to Egypt and Europe in the coming weeks to persuade key players that Abbas cannot be relied on to deliver, and that Israel’s unilateralism is the only game in town.

Olmert, however, may not have things all his own way. If Abbas is able to get the Palestinians to accept the Saudi initiative, Olmert could find himself under strong domestic and international pressure to make a serious negotiating effort, despite the skepticism about its efficacy.

After a recent meeting with Abbas, Ami Ayalon, a leading Labor Party legislator, declared that even though he rejected many of its stipulations, the Saudi plan “could be a basis for negotiation,” because it “supports the idea of a two-state solution.”

The key to whether the Saudi plan becomes a serious option — even if adopted by the Palestinians — lies in Washington. The American goal remains a negotiated two-state solution based on Bush’s “vision” that he outlined in June 2002.

U.S. leaders hope to further this aim by strengthening Abbas and using economic and political leverage to bring Hamas down or force it to moderate its positions. Backing the Saudi plan as a basis for negotiations could promote these ends.

But there is another possibility: that the Saudi plan be put on the table only after Israel completes its planned pullback or what Olmert is now calling “realignment.”

In his Washington meeting with Olmert last week, Bush made it clear that the United States was in no hurry to see unilateral Israeli moves, and wanted to give negotiations another chance. But Bush also assured Olmert that as soon as it became apparent that negotiations are going nowhere, Washington would back Olmert’s unilateral alternative, as long as it does not contradict Bush’s vision of a viable and contiguous Palestinian state.

Most importantly, Bush emphasized that the United States will not recognize the borders Israel pulls back to unilaterally as permanent. And he reiterated the American view that final borders must be agreed upon in negotiations between the parties.

It is here where some analysts believe the Saudi plan could come in: not as a means of pre-empting Israel’s “realignment,” but as a way of taking things further once it is achieved.

 

Abbas’ Move Challenges Olmert Read More »

Nation World Briefs

Ground Troops in Gaza

Israel sent troops into the Gaza Strip for the first time since it withdrew from the territory. Commandos entered northern Gaza on Monday night and attacked a Palestinian squad about to launch a rocket into Israel. Four suspected terrorists were killed and another five wounded. There were no Israeli casualties. Israel had previously relied on its air force and navy for operations in Gaza, partly out of concern that a ground operation could bolster Palestinian claims that the coastal strip continues to be occupied, despite the removal of all 21 settlements and army bases there last August.

Olmert, Mubarak to Meet

Israel’s Ehud Olmert will meet Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak at a June 4 summit in the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-Sheik, the site of May 21 talks between Olmert’s top two deputies and Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. Egyptian officials said they expected the meeting to pave the way for a summit between the P.A. president and the Israeli prime minister.

Jewish Groups Gather Aid for Indonesia

Several Jewish groups set up funds to aid victims of the recent earthquake in Indonesia. The American Jewish World Service (AJWS), the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee (JDC) and B’nai B’rith International are accepting donations for victims of Saturday’s earthquake, which killed an estimated 5,000 people and left tens of thousands injured. The AJWS is accepting donations through its Web site; www.ajws.org. The JDC is taking credit card donations by phone, (212) 687-6200; personal checks should be made out to JDC: Indonesia Earthquake Relief and mailed to JDC: Indonesia Earthquake Relief, Box 321, 847A Second Ave., New York, N.Y., 10017; and online contributions can be made at www.jdc.org. Those wishing to contribute through B’nai B’rith may send checks to its general disaster relief fund, at B’nai B’rith International, 2020 K St. NW, Seventh Floor, Washington, D.C., 20006.

Israel Boycott Recommendation Blasted

British Jewish leaders blasted a decision by a British teachers union to recommend a boycott of Israel. Monday’s vote by the National Association of Teachers in Further and Higher Education, which forces Israeli academics to “publicly declare their political views and subject them to the scrutiny of British academics, is especially pernicious,” the Board of Deputies of British Jews said in a statement. The boycott applies to Israeli lecturers and academic institutions that don’t publicly declare their opposition to Israel’s presence in the West Bank.

Canadian Union Backs Israel Boycott

A large public-sector union in Canada voted to back a boycott against Israel. Some 900 members of the Ontario branch of the Canadian Union of Public Employees voted unanimously at a conference last week to support the campaign until Israel “recognizes the Palestinian right to self-determination.” The president of the union, Sid Ryan, condemned Israel’s security barrier, calling it an “apartheid wall,” and urged that Israeli wines be removed from the shelves of provincial liquor stores. Steven Schulman, regional director of the Canadian Jewish Congress in Ontario, blasted the move.

Jerusalem Compensates Gays, Lesbians

The Jerusalem Municipality was ordered to pay out $70,000 to the city’s gay and lesbian center. Jerusalem District Court on Monday found in favor of a petition filed against City Hall by the Jerusalem Open House, which had been deprived of funding from the municipal cultural chest since 2003. The petitioners were also awarded $5,200 in court costs. Gay and lesbian activists have been at odds with the Jerusalem Municipality before, given Mayor Uri Lupolianski’s misgivings over the annual Gay Pride Parade in the city.

Cancer Patients Call Off Strike

A hunger strike by Israeli cancer patients was called off after the government agreed to boost state-funded treatment. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Monday ordered some $75 million added to the 2006 “health basket” of medications covered by the state. The funding meant a reprieve for Israeli colon-cancer sufferers who until now have had to pay thousands of shekels a month for some of their treatments. Several patients had set up camp outside the Knesset more than two weeks ago and went on a hunger strike in protest. But there was partisan rancor at the prospect that Olmert would provide the money by cutting the defense budget.

Defense Minister Amir Peretz, whose Labor Party is chief coalition partner in the Olmert government, voiced outrage at the decision, prompting speculation that the government could have trouble passing its budget.

Senate Delays P.A. Vote

The U.S. Senate delayed consideration of the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act. The Senate was due to have voted last Friday on the act, cutting off assistance to the Palestinian Authority, but a security scare stemming from an erroneous report of gunfire in the Rayburn Senate Office Building delayed business until after the Memorial Day holiday weekend. With 89 co-sponsors, the act is guaranteed passage. It would cut assistance to the Palestinian Authority, but differs from a version passed last week in the U.S. House of Representatives by allowing the president greater leeway in delivering emergency assistance to the Palestinians. It also narrows the bill’s scope, limiting its restrictions to governments led by the Hamas terrorist group.

Briefs courtesy Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

 

Nation World Briefs Read More »

Warren Buffett’s Jewish Connection

Warren Buffett is not a Jew; in fact, he describes himself as an agnostic.

Still, the billionaire investment guru, who made big news in May when his Berkshire Hathaway corporation bought an 80 percent share in the Israeli metalworks conglomerate, Iscar, for $4 billion, for years has been making his mark on the U.S. Jewish community back home — although sometimes in a roundabout way.

“Proportionally, if you look at the number of Jews in this country and in the world, I’m associated with a hugely disproportionate number,” said Buffett, the second-richest man in the world. His life, he added, “has been blessed by friendship with many Jews.”

The Israeli government stands to reap about $1 billion in taxes on Buffett’s purchase of Iscar. Shortly after announcing the deal, Buffett said he was surprised to learn that a Berkshire subsidiary, CTB International, was purchasing a controlling interest in another Israeli company, AgroLogic.

In Israel — which Buffett plans to visit in the fall — the hope is that the deals will have longer legs: Buffett himself has not ruled out future purchases there and, considering his status as a leading investor, observers say others also may take a look at Israeli companies now that Buffett has done so.

“You won’t find in the world a better-run operation than Iscar,” Buffett says. “I don’t think it’s an accident that it’s run by Israelis.”

Among the first companies Buffett acquired after launching Berkshire Hathaway, the Omaha-based investment and insurance giant, was The Sun Newspapers of Omaha, then owned by Stan Lipsey, one-time chairman of The Jewish Press, Omaha’s Jewish newspaper.

“At the time, the Omaha Club did not take Jewish members, and the Highland Country Club, a golf club, didn’t have any [non-Jewish] members,” Lipsey recalled. “Warren volunteered to join the Highland” — rather than the Omaha — “to set an example of nondiscrimination.”

Buffett happily recalls the fallout from his application.

“It created this big rhubarb,” he said. “All of the rabbis appeared on my behalf, the [Anti-Defamation League] guy appeared on my behalf. Finally they voted to let me in.”

But that wasn’t the end of the story, Buffett said. The Highland had a rule requiring members to donate a certain amount of money to their synagogues. Buffett, of course, wasn’t a synagogue member, so the club changed its policy: Members now would be expected to give to their synagogues, temples or churches.

But that still didn’t quite work, Buffett recalls with a laugh, because of his agnosticism.

In the end, the rule was amended to ask simply that members make some sort of charitable donation, and the path to Buffet’s membership was clear.

“He’s an incredible guy,” said Lipsey, today the publisher of the Buffalo News. In 1973, The Sun won a Pulitzer Prize in local investigative specialized reporting for an expose on financial impropriety at Boys Town, Neb.

“Warren came up with the key source for us knowing what was going on out there,” Lipsey said.

Buffett himself researched Boys Town’s stocks to bolster the story, Lipsey added.

In the 1960s, Omaha Rabbi Myer Kripke decided to invest in his friend Buffett’s new business venture. Their wives had become friendly, he said, and the foursome enjoyed playing the occasional game of bridge together.

“My wife had no card sense and I was certainly no competition to Warren, who is a very good bridge player and a lover of the game,” said Kripke, rabbi emeritus of Omaha’s Conservative Beth El Synagogue. “He’s very bright and very personable and very decent. He is a rich man who is as clean as can be.”

Kripke, father of the noted philosopher Saul Kripke, bought a few shares in Berkshire Hathaway and quickly sold them, doubling his money, he said.

Recognizing a good thing when he saw it, he bought a bunch more shares in his friend’s company, shares that by the 1990s had made Kripke — who says he never earned more than $30,000 a year as a rabbi — a millionaire.

Asked if he credits Buffett with his financial success, he didn’t hesitate.

“Entirely, yes,” he said. “I never had much of an income.”

The Sun newspaper group was not Buffett’s only early purchase of a Jewish-owned company. In 1983, sealing the deal with a handshake, Buffett bought 90 percent of the Nebraska Furniture Mart from Rose Blumkin, a Russian-born Jew who moved to the United States in 1917.

In 1989, he purchased a majority of the stock in Borsheim’s Fine Jewelry and Gifts, a phenomenally successful jewelry store, from the Friedman family.

“He has many friends in the Jewish community,” said Forrest Krutter, secretary of Berkshire Hathaway and a former president of the Jewish Federation of Omaha.

Buffett’s former son-in-law, Allen Greenberg, is a Jew, and now runs the Buffett Foundation, much of whose work has dealt with reproductive rights and family-planning issues. Buffett’s personal assistant is Ian Jacobs, who goes by his Hebrew name, Shami.

Buffett himself counts the late Nebraska businessman Howard “Micky” Newman and philanthropist Jack Skirball as among his “very closest friends.”

Further, Buffett said his “hero and the man who made me an investment success” was Ben Graham. Graham, along with Newman’s father, Jerry, ran a New York fund called Graham-Newman Corp.

“After besieging Ben for the three years after I received my degree from Columbia, Ben and Jerry finally hired me,” Buffett said. “I was the first gentile ever employed by the firm — including secretaries — in its 18 years of existence. My first son bears the middle name Graham after Ben.”

Buffett “is very much honored in the Jewish community,” Kripke said.

 

Warren Buffett’s Jewish Connection Read More »

Welcome to the Neighborhood

Like most L.A. residents, we’ve moved many times over the years. From Santa Monica to Culver City, Marina del Rey and then Westwood, it’s not easy to pick up and move 10 or 20 miles with everything you own. At least, that’s how we felt until a little over a year ago, when we made the 7,582-mile move to Jerusalem.

We rented an apartment, and after two months, we started looking for a place to buy. We were used to the traditional wooden ranch-style home with big yards, a garage and a fireplace, set in a sprawling L.A. suburban neighborhood. Of course, we knew we’d need to be flexible — Jerusalem is not, after all, Los Angeles. So we set out looking for a traditional stone ranch-style home with big yards, a garage and a fireplace, set in a sprawling Jerusalem suburb.

Our first clue that things might be just a bit different in Israel came when a realtor offered us a ride to the property he was showing. That is, he offered one of us a ride.

“Sorry,” he said, pointing across the street at his motorcycle. “I only have room for one.”

I’m not sure, but I think in California you have to prove ownership of an Infiniti or a Cadillac to secure a real estate agent’s license.

One of the other differences in Israel is that a real estate agent finds the buyer a property, but that’s about it. The next steps are to hire a lawyer, sit down with a banker and, finally — with your lawyer at your elbow — sign a contract. At first this seemed like excessive specialization. Then, on the first property we tried to buy, our lawyer discovered the city was planning to put in a new road — running right through the property we wanted to buy.

We began to get the idea.

You can find large homes in Israel, although ranch style is pretty much off the menu. Homes in Jerusalem are mostly condos, but in the suburbs there are larger properties — townhomes with private gardens and large single-family homes in communities like Efrat in Gush Etzion.

What you can find in Jerusalem depends very much on the neighborhood. In our case we wanted to be in Kiryat Moshe — a central neighborhood, and that meant getting used to a different approach to housing.

Jerusalem is small by L.A. standards, and space is at a premium. We began to figure this out when we looked at an apartment advertised as “spacious” that seemed to have only two bedrooms.

“No, there’s plenty of room,” the agent explained to my wife, Sarah, waving his hands around. “Just come through here. Wait till you see this!”

They went through a door and there, sure enough, were two more bedrooms, and what was probably the nicest kitchen (though small) she had seen yet.

“You can even rent this out as a separate unit,” the realtor explained, “if you don’t need the space.”

“But isn’t this the, uh, parking area?” Sarah asked.

The realtor smiled back. “Sure. What’s the problem? Zoning laws? If an inspector comes, just take out the beds and open it up. No big deal.”

As you would expect, each neighborhood has its own unique features. After touring a condo in the Old City with an amazing view of the Temple Mount, the agent mentioned, somewhat casually, “Of course, they’re still digging for antiquities in the basement.”

You get used to privacy in Los Angeles. Life is defined by home, work and the commute between, and meeting your neighbors takes a bit of effort and planning. Not so in Israel.

In Jerusalem, people get involved in each other’s lives. We noticed this when we first moved in, walking into our living room to find a fresh plate of cake and cookies waiting for us on a white tablecloth, set out by our landlady. Then, just a few weeks ago, our downstairs neighbor’s son had a bar mitzvah. She had a number of friends and relatives coming into town, and neighbors all through the neighborhood volunteered to host them for Shabbat.

Of course this cuts both ways, as we found when we went to take another look at the home we’re (finally) thinking of buying. We walked down the sidewalk and stopped, looking at the backyard. A boy, around 11 or 12, was sitting on the fence in the yard next door — Tom Sawyer in a kippah.

“Are you buying the house?” he asked, in tones that sounded somewhat suspicious.

“Maybe,” I answered. “We’re thinking about it.”

He kicked his feet a few times, then looked up and asked, “Do you have any children?”

“Yes, we do,” I told him. “Older than you. Why?”

He jumped off the wall and glanced at us, his expression showing impatience that anyone could miss something so obvious. “Boys to play with, of course,” he said, picking up a soccer ball and tossing it, over our heads, to a few of his friends down the block.

If we do end up buying it, I’ll tell my lawyer to be sure to check the contract carefully.

There may be a soccer clause in there somewhere.

Avi Schnurr has been a regular speaker and writer for policy institutes and other forums and received his master’s in physics from UCLA. He is married with four children, and lives, works and studies in Jerusalem.

 

Welcome to the Neighborhood Read More »

The Circuit

A Song for Ken

The annual dinner of the International Visitors Council of Los Angeles reached its touching climax when Israeli-born European singing sensation, Liel, called veteran music manager (and her own U.S. manager) Ken Kragen on stage to perform with her “We Are the World.” The performance was only fitting since Kragen received the Robert D. Kleist International Citizen Award in part for his co-production of the 1985 hit video, “We Are the World,” for which he used his connections in the music world to bring together some of the leading entertainers to fight starvation in Africa.

Harry Belafonte, who worked closely with Kragen on “We Are the World” and several other humanitarian projects, presented Kragen with the award at an event attended by council supporters, city officials and consuls general from Bangladesh, Brazil, Germany, Hungary, Romania and the Slovak Republic. The International Visitors Council of Los Angeles is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization whose mission is to increase international understanding and cooperation. Actress/comedian Suzanne Whang served as emcee and ventriloquist Ronn Lucas performed in honor of Kragen, who is also their manager. — Orit Arfa, Contributing Writer

The Cole Thing

Helping Hand of Los Angeles celebrated its 77th anniversary by honoring entertainer Natalie Cole at its annual Mother’s Day luncheon at the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel. The group, which is Cedars-Sinai Medical Center’s oldest active fundraising support group, supports the department of obstetrics and gynecology by funding endowments, research projects and capital expenditures. Its legacy is a commitment to women and children and it has contributed more than $17 million to the hospital during its tenure. The event featured an exciting fashion show and gifts for volunteers.

Just Make A Wish

Ever wish you could be at a charity event with a red carpet featuring a “Desperate Housewife”; an auction filled with beautiful art, jewels and collectibles; endless wines, liquors and yummy foods? Well your wish would’ve come true when Make-a-Wish Foundation held its Uncork-a-Wish Wine Tasting and auction to fulfill wishes for children in L.A. County with life-threatening medical conditions.

More than 2,000 guests filled the Pacific Design Center, making the evening, which raised, $290,000, the biggest in the event’s history.

Upon arrival, guests were greeted with a glass of Veuve Clicquot Rosé Champagne and walked among row after row of silent auction packages, including an autographed Kobe Bryant jersey and shoes that sold for $2,950, a guitar signed by the band Chicago that sold for $1,500 and a plasma television from Norcent Technology that brought in $1,950.

For those desperate to get her photo, “Desperate Housewives” and “Burnt Toast” author Teri Hatcher posed with guests who made a $100 donation to the foundation — in 30 minutes, she had raised more than $3,000!

Lots for Lane

Northridge resident Shirley Lane of Shirim ha Emek group, Hadassah Southern California, has been named a recipient of the 20th annual Hadassah National Leadership Award. The prestigious award pays tribute to members whose leadership accomplishments within Hadassah and civic, education and cultural organizations reflect Hadassah’s dedication to the principles of the volunteer ethic. Recipients, who are selected by their peers, represent a wide range of accomplishments.

“Shirley’s past achievements have led to this well-deserved honor, and we look forward to her continued good work for Shirim ha Emek and Hadassah,” said Marcia Gould, president of Shirim ha Emek.

 

The Circuit Read More »

Obituaries

VERONICA MARIA BABOS died May 15 at 75. She is survived by her children, Cathy and Peter (Constance); three grandchildren; and one great-grandchild. Hillside

Lena Benlifer died May 12 at 87. She is survived by her daughter, Arlene Mindus. Malinow and Silverman

Arthur Berkowitz died May 13 at 92. He is survived by his wife, Esther; daughters, Juliana (Scott) Lookholder and Miriam (Larry) Feldman; three grandchildren; two great-grandchildren; and brother, Martin. Mount Sinai

Harry Bronley died May 7 at 82. He is survived by his wife, Bertha; son, Bruce; daughters, Gail Kelman and Debbie Glynn; and 10 grandchildren. Groman

Minnie Brown died May 10 at 87. She is survived by her daughter, Ellen; and son, Scott. Malinow and Silverman

Cecile Brownstein died May 9 at 67. She is survived by her daughters, Susan Dehaaf, Melissa Griffin and Laura Beth; three grandchildren; cousin, Alan Reich. Mount Sinai

Phyllis Cayse died May 12 at 75. She is survived by her husband, Raymond; sons, David and Hal (Denise) Schectman; stepchildren, Julie (Brent) Kirkpatrick and Russell (Lisa); five stepgrandchildren; and “sister,” Arleen (Thomas Rogers) Winkler. Mount Sinai

Enid Lois Dunkleman died May 11 at 75. She is survived by her husband, Donald; daughters, Fern (Mike) Rajic and Robin (Larry) Kaplan; son, Scott (Leslie); brothers, Edward (Faye) and Alan (Charlotte) Ruby; and nine grandchildren. Malinow and Silverman

Adolph Feldman died May 10 at 92. He is survived by his wife, Selma; son, Mark; daughter, Hilary Brover; and four grandchildren. Groman

Martin Feldman died May 10 at 87. He is survived by his wife, Ethel; sons, Robert and Lawrence; nine grandchildren; two great-grandchildren; and brothers, Norman and Leonard. Groman

Karen Faith Fine died May 10 at 51. She is survived by her mother, Elaine Steinhardt; brother, Ken (Kinue) Steinhardt; and aunt, Shirley Loeb. Malinow and Silverman

Carl Fingerhood died May 9 at 89. He is survived by his son, Bruce; daughter, Nanci; and one grandchild. Groman

Sue Fisher died May 8 at 72. She is survived by her son, Stevan Fisher; daughter, Jody Schneider; two grandchildren; and brother, Eddie Chidakel. Groman

Seymour Goldblum died May 8 at 86. He is survived by his daughter, Diane Bloch; and three grandchildren. Groman

Albert Hoffman died May 14 at 77. He is survived by his wife, Barbara Hoffman; five children; 17 grandchildren; and one brother. Mount Sinai

CHESTER DANIEL KALLIS died May 12 at 60. He is survived by his mother, Sophia; and cousins; Marian (Bob) Price, Shirley Kraut and Jim (Beverly Ball). Hillside

Gerald Kanas died May 13 at 86. He is survived by his wife, Doris; daughters, Nancy Rothfeder and Susan Fein; and son, Michael. Malinow and Silverman

SYLVIA KAPLAN died May 13 at 98. She is survived by her son, David (Cyrila) and two grandchildren. Hillside

Elsie Kaufman died May 10 at 87. She is survived by her son, Ira; daughter, Marion Earl; two grandchildren; sister, Mildred Hoffman. Groman

Kenneth Kaufman died May 11 at 56. He is survived by his parents, Walter and Margye; and brothers, Richard (Gayle) and Robert (Brenda). Mount Sinai

Harold Klein died May 9 at 87. He is survived by his wife, Haydie; son, Steven; daughter, Mia; and sisters, Helen Zisovic and Eva Gros. Groman

Anna Klerer died May 12 at 95. She is survived by her husband, Sam; son, Dr. Joseph; one grandchild; one stepgreat-grandchild; and brother, Menachem Schwartz. Malinow and Silverman

Paul Kraemer died May 5 at 76. He is survived by his sons, David and Samuel; daughter, Beth Bubis; and seven grandchildren. Groman

ANNETTE LIBERTY LAZARE died May 9 at 87. She is survived by her children, Merridy (Len) Mishkin and Michael (Akiko); and grandchildren, Suzy and Seth Blonder. Hillside

Gertrude Leib died May 12 at 91. She is survived by her sons, Richard and Dr. Jack; nine grandchildren; and 12 great grandchildren. Groman

RITA VENTURA LOEB died March 6 at 86. She is survived by her brother, Jean; nieces, Alba and Alina Ventura; and great nephews. Inglewood Park Cemetary.

William Mandl died May 11 at 71. He is survived by his brothers, Theodore (Emilie) and Robert (Angie). Mount Sinai

Irene Neumann died May 11 at 86. She is survived by her son, Seth; and her sister, Gertrude Berger. Groman

Bernard Rosenberg died May 6 at 80. He is survived by his wife, Penelope; stepsons, Mitchell and David Stanton; six grandchildren; and niece, Sheila Plotkin. Groman

Rose Rosenthal died May 4 at 94. She is survived by her daughter, Barbara (Jim) Colitz. Malinow and Silverman

Irving Rudman died May 11 at 81. He is survived by his wife, Celia; son, Barry (Sherry); grandson, Jeffrey (Dove); great-grandson, Wyatt; and brother, Morris. Mount Sinai

Bertha Sachs died May 3 at 94. She is survived by her son, Theodore (Jill); nephews, Alan Cohn and Richard Abend; great-nephew, Randy Cohn; great-niece, Taryl Cohn; and caregiver, Nara Nosrati. Groman

Harriet Schulz died May 13 at 90. She is survived by her daughter, Barbara; and son, Steve (Janet) Fair. Malinow and Silverman

Dorothy Sherry died May 11 at 82. She is survived by her son, Doug (Cheryl) Leatherman; stepdaughter, Evy Selwyn; and three grandchildren; and two great-grandchildren. Mount Sinai

Esther Siegel died May 9 at 83. She is survived by her daughters, Karen (Mitchel) Daks and Wendy (Larry) Silver; son, Jeffrey (Laura); eight grandchildren; and sister, Lee Berkowitz. Mount Sinai

Devorah Siegman died May 4 at 96. She is survived by her daughter, Diane Siegman. Malinow and Silverman

Florence Sitzer died May 12 at 90. She is survived by her sister, Anna Helen Sitzer; nieces, Susan Revak and Lorraine Simasky; and nephew, Jeffrey. Groman

Joel Michael Solomon died May 8 at 53. He is survived by his brother, Donald Solomon. Malinow and Silverman

SELMA SORKIN died May 9 at 94. She is survived by her husband, Barney; daughters, Sandra (Charles) Diamond and Carol (Ian) Hunter; son, Donald Sorkin; nine grandchildren; and four great-grandchildren. Hillside

Esther Telerant died May 12 at 91. She is survived by her sons, Michael (Frima) and Charles; stepchildren, Nira (Arye) and Amir (Susie); grandchildren, Holly and Robin; stepgrandchildren, Danny and Yael; and stepgreat-grandchild, Adi.

Bessie Weinstein died May 12 at 95. She is survived by her daughter, Sheila Hutman. Malinow and Silverman

 

Obituaries Read More »