fbpx

July 24, 2003

Davis Recall Fight Plays Jewish Card

With his political fortunes darkening and support for the recall growing, the beleaguered Gov. Gray Davis has turned to members of his disparate ethnic and religious coalition to save his job. In the past six weeks, prominent African American, Latino and gay and lesbian political and business leaders have held a series of high-profile events to condemn the recall as an illicit power grab by the radical right and a threat to California.

Now, Davis and his allies are playing the Jewish card.

On July 21, Community Leaders Against the Recall, an ad-hoc group of prominent Jews created by former Congressman Mel Levine, held a press conference at the Simon Wiesenthal Center in support of Davis. Levine, speaking in impassioned tones, said the governor has long been a friend to the Jewish community and a stalwart supporter of Israel.

Levine spoke alongside seven community leaders, including Norm Pattiz, City Councilman Jack Weiss and Howard Welinsky as two television cameras, a reporter from KFWB and The Jewish Journal looked on.

Pattiz, a Davis contributor and CEO of Westwood One radio network, said the recall has been driven by right-wing talk radio hosts. When the general-market media gets involved in the debate, Pattiz said support for the recall will shrink.

Weiss agreed. “Once people know the recall will plunge this state into a crisis,” he said, “they will no longer support it. Everyone has a stake in not seeing the clock turned back.”

Levine warned that a successful recall could open a “Pandora’s box” of political instability, a danger to Jews and other minorities. He also called it a waste of taxpayer money.

The press conference was merely the first salvo in what promises to be a growing anti-recall movement among Jews, said Levine.

But while some Jews may publicly bolster Davis, many say — privately — their staunch opposition to the recall shouldn’t be mistaken as an enthusiastic endorsement for Davis. Like other voters, some Jews criticize him for the ballooning state deficit, a lack of leadership and for degrading the political process through incessant fundraising and vicious campaigning.

“He combines the personality of Michael Dukakis with the ethics of Tony Soprano,” said Jack Pitney, professor of government at Claremont McKenna College, adding that Davis once asked UC Berkeley Democratic students to pay $100 for the privilege of speaking with him at the campus.

Davis’ gray personality and ethics notwithstanding, most Jews oppose the recall, because they largely share his political philosophy, have a longstanding relationship with the governor and worry about the possibility of someone worse replacing him. Jews also seem bothered by the uncertainty surrounding attempts to unseat a sitting governor with a seldom-used initiative. Even Jewish Republicans appear ambivalent.

As one of the nation’s most liberal communities, Jews have politically embraced the Democrat Davis. In last year’s re-election, 69 percent of the state’s Jewish voters cast ballots for him. Only African Americans, at 79 percent, were bigger supporters, according to a Los Angeles Times Poll.

Davis and the community have longstanding historical ties that date back more than two decades. In the mid-1980s, he represented the heavily Jewish district of West Hollywood in the Assembly.

As governor, Davis has visited Israel, signed legislation expanding the definition of hate crimes to include such acts as painting a swastika on a synagogue and, at his behest, the Simon Wiesenthal Center has received $31.4 million, the Zimmer Museum $2.4 million and the Skirball Museum $6.4 million over the past five years from the California Arts Council and the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, a Davis spokesman said.

“You’d be hard-pressed to find any governor who has focused with such intensity and compassion on issues that affect the Jewish community,” said Eric C. Bauman, deputy campaign manager of Davis-backed Taxpayers Against the Governor’s Recall.

Jews, for their part, have ponied up hefty campaign donations to Davis and his allies over the years. Recent large gifts include $100,000 from billionaire Haim Saban and $25,000 from Richard S. Ziman’s Arden Realty to the anti-recall Taxpayers group, campaign filings show.

If Jews don’t have the same emotional connection to the governor that they had with such charismatic politicians as Bill Clinton and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, they at least know that the governor will come through for them, albeit at a price, said Joel Kotkin, senior fellow at the Davenport Institute for Public Policy at Pepperdine University.

“I think there are a lot of Jews invested in Gray Davis, because they have invested in him,” he said.

Jews seem to have little, if anything, invested in Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Vista), a conservative Republican of Lebanese Christian heritage who recently met with Palestinian Authority President Yasser Arafat. Issa, the recall’s biggest financial backer and a declared candidate for governor, frightens many Jews with his law-and-order politics and right-wing social agenda, experts said. Actor Arnold Schwarzenegger also appears to elicit scant enthusiasm among Jewish voters.

“Often, politics is driven by a fear of the alternative rather than a love of what’s going on,” said political scientist Bruce Cain, director of the Institute of Governmental Studies at UC Berkeley. “I think that’s what’s going on here.”

However, Jewish support for Davis could erode if former Los Angeles Mayor Richard Riordan, a moderate Republican, enters the race, said Sherry Bebitch Jeffe, senior scholar at the School of Policy, Planning and Development at USC.

Surprisingly, Jewish Republicans seem tepid about the recall. The Republican Jewish Coalition (RJC), for instance, has taken no official position on the issue, preferring, instead to focus on the re-election of President Bush.

As much as they loathe Davis, some conservative Jews have concerns about upending the democratic process, even though the governor won re-election by running bitterly negative campaigns against Republican candidates Riordan and Bill Simon.

“I don’t know if this is the way we should go about our business,” said Joel Strom, president of the RJC’s L.A. chapter and a “reluctant” supporter of the recall.

For other Jewish Republicans, opposing the recall is a matter of politics. Sheldon Sloan, a longtime Republican activist, said an unsuccessful recall “could be spun into a victory and used by Davis as springboard to the White House.”

Recall organizers have submitted about 1.6 million petition signatures. To qualify, they need 897,158 valid ones. Depending on when they are verified, a special election could be held in October or November or consolidated with the March 4 presidential primary.

Pro-Davis forces want to delay the election until the spring, because they expect a heavy Democratic turnout during the presidential primary. Bush is expected to run unopposed.

Davis and his allies have already sharpened their knives to hold off the election, discredit potential opponents and energize supporters, including Jews.

Last week, lawyers for the anti-recall effort unsuccessfully went to court to seek a preliminary injunction against counting signatures, because of several alleged irregularities. Davis later called the recall bid an attempt to “hijack” government.

The governor’s allies have painted Issa as a dangerous extremist with a shady past. Stories about a decades-old misdemeanor conviction for possession of an unregistered weapon and an indictment on charges of stealing a Maserati from a car dealership (the case was later dismissed) have cropped up in the press and on anti-Issa Web sites.

Not leaving anything to chance, the Davis camp has recently made a concerted effort to burnish his image among Southern California Jews.

Davis supporters, for instance, originally tried to hold Levine’s Community Leaders’ press conference at The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, an important symbol in the local community. Insiders said a Davis staff member placed a call to Federation President John Fishel and lobbied him. Because of the charity’s status as a nonprofit and the potential appearance of a conflict of interest, Fishel turned down the request, sources said.

The Wiesenthal Center, which Davis visited in February to officially open a new exhibit called, “Finding Our Families, Finding Ourselves,” agreed to host the event, although the center charged a $1,000 rental fee and gave no endorsement, said Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean. No Wiesenthal personnel attended the press conference, he added.

That Davis and his allies are so willing to use the Jewish Federation and Wiesenthal Center for “crass partisan” purposes highlights their win-at-all-costs mentality, said Arnold Steinberg, a Republican political strategist.

“They see [Jewish institutions] just as something to be manipulated politically,” he said.

Whether true or not, Jews will likely unite in favor of Davis, a longtime, if not deeply loved, ally.

“He’s not a hugger or a back-slapper. That’s why it’ll take time for support to come,” said Welinsky, chairman of Democrats for Israel and a member of Levine’s ad hoc group. “But I’m confident it will come.”

Davis Recall Fight Plays Jewish Card Read More »

Settling the Land

My first trip to Israel was a six-week summer program for high school
students. I have very clear memories of my first Shabbat in
Jerusalem, especially the afternoon program conducted by our counselors. The
program was a mock talk show where the host would interview three different
individuals all leading Jewish lives. After the interviews, we were divided
into three groups, each having the dubious task of presenting one of the
three positions as being “the best and most useful way of life to the Jewish
people.”

The first interview was with a young Israeli named Koby. A son of Holocaust
survivors, Koby grew up on a secular kibbutz, where he learned the Zionist
values of working the soil of Israel. On his 18th birthday, Koby enlisted in
the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) elite paratrooper brigade, where he served
as a company commander. Asked how he understood Judaism, he responded, “My
parents are Holocaust survivors. They came from a place where nobody
defended them. My entire Jewish identity is wrapped up in my obligation to
defend the Jewish State.”

Asked if he or his family observe any elements of Jewish tradition, he
answered, “We live in Israel, we work the land and I now spend my life
defending our right to be Jewish. Is there any greater reflection of Jewish
tradition?”

The second interview was with a young lady named Rachel. Also a daughter of
Holocaust survivors, Rachel’s life took a very different direction than
Koby’s. Rachel, 24, was married at the age of 18 and settled in B’nei B’rak,
a city with a heavy concentration of ultra-Orthodox Jews. Rachel was the
mother of five children and looked forward to building an even larger
family. Her husband, Moshe, was a full-time Yeshiva student and, having
received an exemption from IDF service, studied Torah day and night.

Asked to explain her Jewish identity, Rachel responded, “Being the child of
Holocaust survivors, I know what happened to our people in Europe. We were
alienated from Jewish tradition, seeking secular European lifestyles instead
of maintaining Judaism. My husband and I fear this trend toward secularism
again here in Israel. That is why we have committed ourselves to living a
strictly observant lifestyle, building a large family and studying Torah.”
Asked how she felt about her husband’s exemption from military service,
Rachel said, “My husband defends the spiritual heritage of the Jewish State.
Without active Torah study, we have nothing to defend here.”

The third and final interview was with Abraham Schwartz. He was a successful
businessman who lived with his family in New York City. Active in his
synagogue, Abraham considered himself a “traditional Jew.” His financial
success in business afforded Abraham the opportunity to support many Jewish
causes. His most generous giving was toward Israel.

Asked how he felt about living in the Diaspora vs. Israel, Abraham
responded, “I feel very blessed to be able to support a variety of causes in
Israel. I believe that my philanthropy toward Israel, and my leadership
positions in many organizations that motivate others to support Israel, are
equally, if not more important, than my actually living in Israel.”

Asked if he intended to move to Israel, he said, “As long as I am in the
financial position to help Israel from abroad, I believe that it is my
obligation to stay here and continue my fundraising activities on behalf of
Israel.”

We were then asked to choose between three positions: physical survival,
spiritual continuity or financial realities.

Both parshot Mattot and Masei raise these dilemmas by focusing on the
mitzvah of “settling the Land of Israel.” This mitzvah, a unique commandment
that centers our physical existence and identity on one small geographic
locale, raises numerous halachic, philosophical and practical issues that
occupy thousands of pages of Jewish literature. The discussion has become
more intense in the past 55 years, because the mitzvah of living in Israel
is no longer a theoretical construct.

So who’s the “best Jew?” Realities teach us that building a Jewish State is
a complex project, one that requires military strength, spiritual vitality
and financial security. So rather than choosing among the three, I would
prefer to say thank you to Koby, Rachel, Abraham and the populations they
represent. Each one, in his or her own unique way, is contributing to the
mitzvah of settling Eretz Yisrael. The challenge of contemporary Israeli and
Diaspora Jewry is to recognize that the continuity of the mitzvah and
privilege of settling Eretz Yisrael is contingent upon the creation of an
atmosphere where Koby, Rachel and Abraham learn to respect each other’s
differences, and learn to recognize each other’s contributions toward
building Jewish life.


Daniel Bouskila is rabbi of Sephardic Temple Tifereth Israel.

Settling the Land Read More »

Jewish Wizard Takes Flight in New Potter Book

Are there Jews at Hogwarts? The world’s most famous School of Witchcraft and Wizardry might be muggle-free, but it is possible that it has an equal-opportunity policy for Jewish wizards.

In "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," the fifth of seven books in J.K. Rowling’s insanely popular children’s series, readers are introduced to one Anthony Goldstein.

The book doesn’t tell us much about Anthony, but we can ascertain certain things. He is in Ravenclaw, which means he is of "the sharpest mind" according to the "sorting hat." Because Anthony is a prefect, he is a considered to be a leader among his classmates. We know that he is one of the good guys, because he joins "Dumbledore’s Army," the defense against the dark arts class that Harry teaches after the unctuous professor Dolores Umbridge removes anything remotely practical from their defense lessons.

Representatives at Scholastic Books, the publisher of the Harry Potter series, said they had "no idea" if Anthony is Jewish or not, and Rowling was unavailable for comment. However, Dr. Raymond Jones, a professor of English at the University of Alberta, who teaches literature courses in "Harry Potter," said that is was highly probable that Anthony is Jewish.

"One of the things that is happening here is that Rowling is making the school contemporary," Jones said. "The school seems quite old-fashioned — they use quills and not computers — but, by populating her school with a variety of ethnic backgrounds, she is admitting to the reality of modern England and modern America."

But even if Anthony and others are Jewish, don’t expect them to start lighting the menorah too soon; according to Jones, religion plays no role of any kind in Harry Potter — where the only miracles are ones done by the wizarding community.

Jewish Wizard Takes Flight in New Potter Book Read More »

No Buddy Quite Like Him

The "Encyclopedia of Jewish Humor" includes 14 pages of jokes on death, so when Buddy Hackett passed away in Malibu at 78 on June 30, the chapel at Hillside Memorial Park was packed with every comedy icon that hadn’t booked an out-of-town Fourth of July gig.

Sid Caesar sat up front with Jan Murray; Don Rickles was there; Norm Crosby; Tom Poston; Dick Martin of "Laugh-In" fame. With Shecky Greene scheduled to deliver the eulogy, a Groucho Marx quote came to mind: "Reverence and irreverence are the same thing."

"This is a very holy moment in time," said Rabbi Solomon Rothstein, a Hackett family friend from Fort Lee, N.J., by way of Boynton Beach, Fla. "It is dedicated to memory."

Curtains parted, revealing a dozen different photos and portraits of Buddy, including a huge black-and-white head shot from the movie "It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad World," which Hackett starred in with 10 other Borscht Belters.

"We are here to celebrate Buddy’s life," the rabbi continued. "We shouldn’t be asking ‘How did he die?’ But ‘How did he live?’ And it was his wish that when I say the name ‘Buddy Hackett,’ you smile … that you laugh."

"Buddy would have wanted me to tell a joke," Rothstein said. "But I wouldn’t dare."

And then people got up to make the mourners laugh. Everyone who made them laugh got applause. Anybody too serious got bubkes.

Buddy’s son, Sandy Hackett, is in the family business. He drove in from Las Vegas, where he was performing stand-up. He poured himself a drink from the old man’s favorite liquor and delivered a eulogy that exemplified his father’s credo: "If it’s dirty, it’s not funny. If it’s funny, it’s not dirty."

Among the cleaner stories he told was an old one about a mezuzah that was mistaken for "a Jewish dog whistle."

One of the great clowns of Hollywood, Hackett was hilarious both standing up on stage or slapping around in movies like "The Music Man" and "The Love Bug."

"Everybody who tells a Buddy Hackett story does Buddy Hackett’s voice," Greene said in Buddy’s slurry, side-of-the-mouth slapshtick. "I worked with a man called Sinatra, and Buddy was like that. You hear his voice, you know it’s him."

Jeffrey Ross, a young shtickler known for hanging out with the alter-kackers at the Friars Club, was touching and funny.

"Buddy was like orange juice," Ross said. "He’d give you the ‘Hiya pal!’ and how could you not feel great?"

Buddy, Ross explained, taught him "how to peel the onion" in his act.

Buddy was mourned as a grandfather, a poet, an anti-depressant and "a great humanitarian." (Hackett created an animal rescue assistance center with his wife, Sherri.)

Back outside in the July afternoon heat, writer Larry Gelbart and witty entertainer Steve Lawrence circled close with Marx Brothers’ screenwriter Irving Brecher.

"Let’s get together again," Brecher told his old friends.

"Not here!" Lawrence fired back.

Then someone muttered that Hackett was one of America’s few remaining true clowns.

"We still have Bush and Rumsfeld," Brecher said.

The prophet Isaiah’s words extend from a wall at Hillside: "The Lord God maketh death to vanish in life eternal. And he wipeth away tears from off all faces."

So do the comedians.

No Buddy Quite Like Him Read More »

Ariel Avrech

Ariel Avrech died of complications from severe pulmonary fibrosis on July 1. He was 22.

“He was incredibly learned,” said Avrech’s father, Emmy-winning screenwriter Robert Avrech (“The Devil’s Arithmetic”). “I always learned from him. Our roles were reversed. He was also very funny and had a very dry, ironic sense of humor.”

A Pico-Robertson resident, Avrech was in dire need of a living lobar lung transplant. Unfortunately, a worldwide organ search, facilitated by Jewish Healthcare Foundation Avraham Moshe & Yehudis Bikur Cholim, was unsuccessful.

Avrech’s first brush with a life-threatening disease came at age 14, when he endured massive chemotherapy to eradicate a brain tumor. In early 2002, the Yeshiva Gedolah of Los Angeles graduate was walking up a hill at Baltimore’s Ner Yisroel campus, where he was continuing his studies, when he experienced difficulty breathing. By May 2002, doctors learned that the chemotherapy that conquered his cancer left him with severe pulmonary fibrosis.

Avrech’s condition worsened in the last year. In recent months, he could only breathe with the assistance of an oxygen tank. He also took steroids to stabilize his condition, which deteriorated drastically by April, when he was not emitting enough carbon dioxide. Avrech spent his last three months hospitalized on a respirator in intensive care.

“He was never confronted with the fact that there was no hope,” said Avrech’s mother, Karen Avrech. “He lapsed into unconsciousness.”

“He really suffered horribly in the last few months,” she continued, “but he never complained. He always maintained that he would make the best of what had happened to him. He was very hopeful and very grateful to his parents and to his doctors.”

Karen noted that her son had a passion for many subjects: physics, cosmology, cooking, history, literature and, especially, politics. Avrech enjoyed listening to KABC radio personality Larry Elder, who visited Avrech at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in May.

Most of all, Avrech was deeply committed to his faith and his community.

“One of the remarkable things about Ariel was that he was able to bridge the boundaries that normally separate the religious community,” Robert said. “Ariel was very close with the Orthodox, but also close with the modern Orthodox.”

In November, Avrech told The Journal that he maintained a positive mental state by studying Torah with a study partner.

“When I go for a day without it, I feel like I’m not living a real life,” he said.

Services for Avrech were held at Young Israel of Century City. Avrech is survived by his parents, Robert and Karen; and sisters, Leda and Aliza.

The Avrech family has formed the Ariel Avrech Foundation. Donations in his memory should be made out to “G’mach Fund Young Israel Century City.” For more information, contact (310) 273-6954. For information on organ donation, visit Halachic Organ Donor Society at www.hods.org .

Ariel Avrech Read More »

The Circuit

Research and Rescue

If you yell “action” for a living in Hollywood, you have no doubt visited the Beverly Hills Hotel. But if it’s “Women of Action” you want, then the Beverly Hills Hotel would once again be your destination. The home of the Polo Lounge welcomed Israel Cancer Research Fund’s (ICRF) Women of Action annual luncheon, featuring keynote speaker Arianna Huffington.

Spearheading the nooner gala was ICRF’s board chair Jacqueline Bell and co-vice president Norma Fink, who told the audience — which included Joanne Worley, Joanna Cassidy and Ruta Lee — that ICRF raised $28.3 million in grants this year to underwrite Israeli cancer research.

Acid-tongued fashion critic Mr. Blackwell, who introduced Bell, refrained from scrutinizing the summer wear in the room.

Singer Marilyn McCoo introduced her close friend and ICRF honoree Carol Connors, the woman who, among other singer-songwriting achievements, co-wrote the triumphant movie anthem, “Gonna Fly Now,” the theme from “Rocky.”

“Cancer has touched everyone in some way and Israel is always on the cutting edge of everything,” Connors said, before singling out her 85-year-old mother in the audience. The chanteuse sang a song she wrote in honor of her late friend, Frank Sinatra, titled, “Only the Music, Only My Song.”

“You’ll be pleased to know that I’m not going to sing,” said Dr. Carol Hughes Hurvitz, the night’s second honoree. Hurvitz shared how she went from her childhood dream of being a country doctor in the English provinces to become a clinical professor of pediatrics in UCLA’s School of Medicine. She was introduced by former Beverly Hills Mayor MeraLee Goldman, whose 2-year-old daughter was treated by Hurvitz.

Veteran TV producer George Schlatter (“Real People”) recalled how he first met honoree Suzanne de Passe of De Passe Entertainment, when she was a creative assistant working in Detroit for Motown mogul Berry Gordy.

“She was hip when everyone else wanted to be hep,” Schlatter said of the woman who brought The Jackson Five to Gordy’s attention. “She’s won everything but the Pillsbury Bake-Off.”

No doubt, if De Passe really put her mind to it, she could win that, too.

Diversity Loves Company

The Foundation for Ethnic Understanding held an award presentation at the Beverly Hills home of Steve and Nicole Rifkind. The organization’s founder, Rabbi Marc Schneier, presented humanitarian awards to manager and producer Bernie Brillstein, record executive Jeff Harleston and film director Brett Ratner. Def Jam Records co-founder Russell Simmons, the foundation’s secretary, was unable to attend.

Speeches by executive director Lawrence Kopp and Genia Wright, who directs the foundation’s Washington, D.C., office, discussed efforts to strengthen relations between the Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus, Asian Pacific Caucus and Jewish members of Congress. Guests included Jay Stern, Niles Rogers, John Herzfeld, Randy Jackson, Lalo Shifrin, Lisa Lovebrand, Andre Hurrell, David Feldman, Taye Diggs, Guy Oseary, Kenneth “Babyface” Edmonds and Sofia Vergara. The highlight of the evening: an unscheduled introduction by producer Robert Evans, who regaled the crowd with anecdotes about Walt Disney, Michael Eisner and Ratner. — Tom Teicholz, Contributing Writer

Captain Courageous

It wasn’t your ordinary dedication when an F-4U Corsair — one of America’s top fighter planes in World War II — was unveiled recently at the Proud Bird restaurant (which doubles as a flying museum), accompanied by a tribute to Lou Lenart.

Then-Capt. Lenart of the U.S. Marine Corps flew the powerful piston-engine plane in combat in the Pacific, and three years later helped form the nucleus of the fledgling Israeli air force in the War of Independence.

He led the first Israel air force combat mission in a patched-up plane against Egyptian forces within 15 miles of an undefended Tel Aviv.

Lenart and three accompanying planes dropped bombs on the Egyptians, curtailing an attack.

American and Israeli dignitaries attended the event, sponsored by philanthropist Jona Goldrich. The Hungarian-born Lenart, a very youthful 82, is working on the production of a feature movie chronicling the birth of the Israeli air force. — Tom Tugend, Contributing Editor

The Circuit Read More »

Your Letters

Scandal

As a Milken [Community High School] senior, I had several qualms with your article (“When Bad Things Happen to Good Institutions,” July 11).

This article was not newsworthy. It dealt with issues that passed, were dealt with properly and need to be put in the past.

These “scandals” dealt with minors who face the harsh repercussions of their actions. By rehashing these issues, you do not resolve the problem but create pain.

Your newspaper must deal with compelling communal issues, not issues that open wounds and make vague references to the “serious issues, such as snobbery, cliques and harmful pranks.”

The concept of teshuvah [repentance] may never be achieved if we continue to recount painful stories based on erred judgment. The Jewish community must encourage young adults to repent for what they have done, not recount the tragic details.

At Milken, we value students’ integrity above their entertainment value. We need to be reminded that in sensitive situations, students must be treated with dignity and be given the opportunity to change.

Miri Cypers, Encino

Myth of Uniformity

Your “culture of welcoming” column highlighted one of our more aggravated situations (“Myth of Uniformity,” July 11).

What persistently clouds the whole issue, and shouldn’t, is the concept of uniformity. We should strive for unity, yes. But unity is not uniformity.

A black Jew davens with me frequently in a Chabad shul on Shabbos morning. We know we don’t look alike, so what? We are blessing the same day with the same prayers. And those who choose Judaism from other backgrounds should be no less welcome.

Rabbi Baruch Cohon, Los Angeles

I very much appreciated your argument for recognition of diversity among contemporary Jews. To be sure, there are many Jews-by-choice among us, and they do come from a variety of different backgrounds.

Not so long ago, many Jews in America experienced the freedom of religion to mean that they could abandon their Judaism. Now we see that America’s religious freedom encourages many non-Jews to admire and even join the Jewish people. They are a precious complement to our people.

Introduction to Judaism programs are the major avenue through which non-Jews learn the basic essentials for conversion. Although the intro program of the Conservative movement is offered at the University of Judaism, it is the Pacific Southwest regional office of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations (UAHC) — not Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion — that offers the Reform movement’s intro program.

About 15 temples in Southern California and Arizona host the UAHC intro courses. Five-hundred students enroll in the courses every year. Hundreds go on to become Jews, although I do not know the exact number, because of Reform Judaism’s decentralized conversion process.

You can hear wonderful stories of Jewish spiritual discovery from the students of our intro courses. Their journeys are truly inspiring for Jews-by-birth.

Rabbi Jerrold Goldstein , Director UAHC Introduction to Judaism Pacific Southwest Council

The Davis Recall

In “Recall Tarnishes Golden State’s Shine” (July 11), former Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg would have us believe that the forthcoming recall of Gray Davis would yield disaster, and real solutions for California’s ills could be found in his ill-defined idea of “structural reforms.” Too bad Hertzberg doesn’t give us the whole story.

No one could doubt the governor’s absolute failure and betrayal of the public confidence and trust. But California cannot afford to wait three years until he is termed out to be rid of him. He is a poison, a cancer that must be cut out as soon as possible.

Enter the recall, a gift of progressive Gov. Hiram Johnson early in the last century. The recall is the tool, a very extension of democracy instead of an affront to it, with which the citizens of this state may expeditiously remove an elected official.

As for “structural reform,” Hertzberg was certainly referring to an effort by his allies to lower the legislative threshold for passing a state budget — and the tax hikes and spending sprees included therein — from two-thirds to 55 percent. This “reform” is cleverly hidden in a currently circulating initiative to withhold legislators’ pay until a budget is passed.

Alex Burrola , Montebello

I’m a Democrat who voted for Gray Davis. I have tremendous respect for Bob Hertzberg and share his belief that adherence to the results of the political process is an essential protection against tyranny. I also suspect the recall effort is fueled, at least in part, by wealthy Republicans intent on delivering California for George Bush, and it galls me.

But Hertzberg’s arguments against a recall are just wrong on so many points.

Here in California, recalls, initiatives and referenda are part of the total voting package. They are the heart of our democratic system. It’s worth noting that Article 2 of the California Constitution — the section that deals with recalls — begins with the words: “All political power is inherent in the people.”

Abe Rosenberg, Marina del Rey

After reading Bob Hertzberg’s denunciation of the Davis recall effort, I have to wonder: Why do people who oppose the recall think we should be tolerant of an incompetent governor? Why did we tolerate Pete Wilson’s incompetence? Why do we tolerate anything that’s improper? Do we live in a dictatorship?

The American people seem to have an obsession with acceptance, whether good or bad, whether a bad public official or a recurring headache. After all, it’s the norm. Too much trouble to deal with it.

Want things to get better? Then change.

Aric Z. Leavitt, Los Angeles

Weil and Bush

Leadership that leads in the wrong direction should not be applauded. I refer to the comments attributed to Rabbi Steven Weil, as part of his invocation for a fundraiser for President Bush (Weil Delivers Bush Invocation,” July 11).

Yes, it is true that our president has provided strong leadership regarding the war in Iraq and other international issues before and after Sept. 11, but I, like many others, believe he is leading us, this country and the world in ways that have not and will not bring justice or peace.

Ben Tenn , Northridge

Eternally Gay

Concerning “Eternally Gay” (June 27), the first paragraph reads: “In spite of numerous reports that secular Jews are leaving Jerusalem in droves, Israel’s capital held its second annual Gay Pride parade on June 20. I’m not sure why there is a connection being made between gay Israelis and secular Jews. I hope the implication is not that all gay Israelis are secular.

Contact the Jerusalem Open House (hagai@joh.gay.org.il) to get more information on gay Israelis who identify as Jewish and observant. There are more than you may think.

Jeff Bernhardt, Valley Glen

Piece of the Pie

I was amazed to read the letter in your July 4 edition from the man who said that the 6 percent that Jews give to charity is too much, as it may support the stereotype among gentiles that Jews are clannish (referring to “Why Aren’t Jews Giving to Jews?” June 27). I’m wondering if this man ever asked himself how much gentiles give to Jewish charities. I doubt that the figure would even register as a percentage point.

Ninety-nine point nine percent of the tzedakah I give goes to Jewish causes, and I intend to keep it that way. Rather than worrying how those with anti-Semitic tendencies are going to perceive us, he should instead ask himself how we can help our own, as this is what it comes down to in times of crises like these.

After all, in the words of Hillel, “If I am not for myself, who will be? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?”

Tzipporah Saunders, Encino

Shinui Weighs In

Tommy Lapid claimed that if Israel does not agree to release Palestinian prisoners, it would put an end to the peace process (“Shinui Weighs In on Releasing Prisoners,” July 11). How so?

The first sentence of Phase I of the “road map” requires that “the Palestinians immediately undertake an unconditional cessation of violence.” If terrorist groups unilaterally decide that an Israeli refusal to release Palestinian murderers from prison will void their temporary truce, it is they who have put an end to the peace process.

Deborah Koken, Costa Mesa

Race Rulings

I do not disagree with [David] Lehrer and [Joe] Hicks that we need to look deeper for the solution to minority achievement gaps that necessitate diversity programs in college admissions (“Court’s Race Rulings Raise Deeper Issues,” July 11). However, we will need to look beyond simplistic “solutions,” such as vouchers, and must be prepared to make the investments, both familial and governmental, to yield satisfactory results.

We will also have to examine the inherent biases in standardized testing that once benefited WASPS at Eastern colleges and are now excluding certain minority groups.

Access to higher education is also a question of class as well as caste. At the University of Michigan, consideration was given to children of alumni, students who lived in the Upper Peninsula, students who took more rigorous classes or who attended schools known for their academic programs.

According to Goodwin Liu, who wrote the “Causation Fallacy,” it was more likely that plaintiffs Gratz and Grutter were excluded because of these factors, not because of the race of the applicants.

Shirley J. Wilcher ,.President Wilcher Global, LLC Accokeek, Md.

Rise in Aliyot

Two of my daughters are committed to living in Israel. Sarah, who recently completed aliyah, moved there two years ago and lives in Jerusalem with her husband and their infant son. Leah has been a resident for four years, also in Jerusalem, and is currently engaged in the aliyah process.

Both girls have experienced numerous problems in dealing with the Israeli bureaucracy. It is a testament to their fortitude and resolution that they didn’t let Israel’s bureaucrats discourage them from seeing the process through to fruition. The scuttlebutt is that government workers there make it particularly difficult for Americans to immigrate.

When I spoke at Sarah’s wedding last year here in the states, I stated that “more than money, more than rhetoric, Israel needs Jews.” Those words were met with a round of applause, the loudest of which came from Israelis who flew in for the occasion.

The comments that Israeli minister of immigrant absorption, Tzipi Livni, makes about immigration, further support that statement (“Rise in Aliyah Rates From Frum,” July 4). She is quoted as saying “her ministry needs to finds ways to make the country more attractive to potential immigrants.”

A good place for her to start looking is within her own organization.

Leonard M. Solomon, Los Angeles

Your Letters Read More »

For the Kids


Promises Made, Promises Broken

Have you ever broken a promise? You promised to call your Mom when you got to your friend’s house, but you forgot. You promised your friend that you would give her some of your lunch, but you ended up eating it all at lunchtime. In Parshat Matot, we are told that one must keep the promise one has made.

But what if you make a promise that you can’t keep? Well, in this parsha there is also a section that says: if you take a vow (make a promise) that is too difficult to fulfill, you may go ask permission from the rabbis to break it. So take care to do the things you have promised to do. But be careful about making those big promises that you know you won’t be able to keep.


Jerusalem by Moonlight

Here is a beautiful description of a walk through the Jerusalem night, by Aaron Goss, 13. He lives in Farmington Hills, Mich.

It was 2 a.m., walking home with my large family after our seder. We walked along the narrow sidewalk in groups of twos and threes. We passed many apartment buildings, built of cream-colored Jerusalem stone. The older stones had orange-and-brown stains.

I tried to keep up with my 6-year-old cousin, Bene, who was riding a silver-and-blue Razor scooter. The streetlights made it sparkle. Every so often, I reached out and grabbed the foam handles of the scooter to give Bene a push. With each push he let out a hearty laugh.

The cool air brushed against me as I ran. The street lights created a road of light toward our home. We could see shadowy figures moving in every direction and the darkness kept everyone’s image a secret. We would not recognize each other if we met the next day. And yet, I felt a bond with them, knowing that they, like me, were returning from a late-night seder.

I knew we were almost at the hotel when I saw the bridge my uncle’s company had built. Finally, in my bed, I fell fast asleep as soon as my head hit the pillow. It was a great night and a great memory that I will carry with me always.

For the Kids Read More »

Prefer Your Teen to Smoke or to Cheat?

Decades of lecturing around America and of speaking with parents on my radio show have led me to an incredible conclusion: More American parents would be upset with their teenage children if they smoked a cigarette than if they cheated on a test.

How has this come about? This is, after all, an entirely new phenomenon. Almost no member of my generation (those who became teenagers in the 1960s), let alone a member of any previous generation, could ever have imagined that parents would be angrier with their teenage child for smoking than for cheating.

There has been a profound change in American values. In a nutshell, health has overtaken morality. Or, if you prefer, health has become our morality.

The war against tobacco is both a cause and a symptom of this moral confusion. It has saturated American society with the belief that smoking is wrong, even immoral, not simply unhealthy.

Anti-smoking zealots (the term is redundant) in the California Department of Health Services launched a statewide billboard campaign equating cigarettes with drugs. Parents call my show to tell me that when their children see someone smoking, they say, "Look, that person is using drugs!"

Judges in child custody disputes have imbibed the moral idiocy that smoking tells us something about a person’s character. An increasing number of judges take smoking into consideration when choosing which parent is more fit to raise a child. Millions of Americans agree with these judges that smoking is a moral flaw. That is one reason the government airbrushes cigarettes out of pictures of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt and other famous Americans. If a young American were to see Roosevelt smoking a cigarette or Sir Winston Churchill smoking a cigar, what might happen to that child’s wholehearted acceptance of the smoking-is-bad (not merely unhealthy) brainwash?

I smoke a pipe and cigar, and I am amazed at the certitude and chutzpah in the 5-year-olds who have visited my home who confidently walked over to me to tell me I shouldn’t smoke. Had they seen me drinking alcohol, as children regularly see adults do, it would never occur to them to say such a thing.

That we have a war against tobacco rather than alcohol well illustrates the moral confusion of our time. Eighty years ago, when American society warred against a vice, it was alcohol — because the society cared more about fighting evil than fighting potential dangers to health. Alcohol leads to more child and spousal abuse, as well as to murder and rape, than any other single factor. Was one child ever abused because a cigarette or pipe dulled an adult’s conscience? Have any drivers ever killed whole families because they smoked before they drove?

But in this Age of Moral Confusion we have chosen tobacco, not alcohol, as the villain. Because health and living long are our greatest values.

When I was a boy, I attended baseball games where most spectators smoked, but none cursed. Today, there is no smoking at ballparks, but obscene language is shouted out with impunity. We have traded in opposition to firsthand cursing for opposition to secondhand smoke.

So, ask your children if they think you would be more disappointed in their smoking or their cheating. If your child responds "smoking," you are morally failing your child. If you are pleased with that answer, the situation is even worse. If enough Americans prefer that their children cheat than smoke, we are a doomed society. Nor can the issue be avoided by claiming you don’t want your child to either smoke or cheat. That just means you can’t say that cheating is far worse than smoking. You are another American led to believe that healthy and decent are synonymous.

But if you do believe that, ponder these questions: Would you rather your business partner smoke or cheat? Your lawyer? Your friends? Would you feel better if your doctor cheated on medical exams or smoked?

The questions would have been considered absurd a generation ago. The war against tobacco is a symptom and cause of a shallower society. It has done far more harm to America than tobacco. Just ask your teenager.

Dennis Prager hosts his nationally syndicated radio talk show on KRLA-AM 870
in Los Angeles. He is the author of four books, including “Why the Jews? The
Reason for Anti-Semitism” with Rabbi Joseph Telushkin, which will be updated and
rereleased by Simon & Schuster in August. To find out more about Dennis
Prager, visit www.dennisprager.com. or
the Creators Syndicate Web site at www.creators.com.

Prefer Your Teen to Smoke or to Cheat? Read More »

Sharon, Abbas Court White House

As the fragile Israeli-Palestinian peace process inches forward, leaders of both sides are looking to upcoming audiences with President Bush to exert pressure on the other and give the "road map" peace plan some momentum.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his Palestinian Authority counterpart, Mahmoud Abbas, each will seek to persuade the American leader to lean on the other side to move faster — and Bush will be ready to lean on both, Israeli analysts believe.

With domestic criticism growing regarding America’s imbroglio in Iraq, Israeli analysts believe Bush wants progress on the Israeli-Palestinian front to help justify the strike against Saddam Hussein. If toppling the Iraqi dictator is seen to have paved the way for an Israeli-Palestinian accommodation — and, with it, a better chance of pacifying the Middle East as a whole — the administration can argue that the war was worthwhile, the argument goes.

Bush, therefore, will want to resolve as many of the disputed issues on the table as he can. For the Palestinians, most important are releasing prisoners, dismantling settlement outposts, freezing construction of Israeli settlements and Israel’s West Bank security fence and easing restrictions on Palestinian civilians.

Israel will ask Bush to demand that the Palestinians dismantle terrorist groups and decommission their weapons and not make do with the groups’ tenuous cease-fire.

Most analysts agree that little progress will be made without concerted American intervention.

More importantly, in their strategic thinking, both Abbas and Sharon put a premium on ties with America. Even before he took over as prime minister, Abbas advocated the use of American and international pressure on Israel, rather than terrorism, to achieve Palestinian goals.

Sharon, who is to meet with Bush on July 29, sees American support as the key to Israel’s position in the world. He believes that ties with the Bush administration must be carefully nurtured and that Israel should seek prior coordination with Washington whenever appropriate, especially in dealing with the Palestinians. In Sharon’s view, it is absolutely vital that the Palestinian issue not be allowed to erode Israel’s ties with Washington.

Of course, there will be tactical maneuvering by both prime ministers, but their meetings with President Bush should be understood in a wider strategic context.

Abbas reportedly will highlight two key issues in his White House meeting on Friday: getting more Palestinian prisoners released and stopping construction of the security fence. He will argue that if Israel is really serious about turning over a new leaf, it should release all Palestinian prisoners, even those with "blood on their hands," i.e., those involved in terror attacks.

On the security fence, the Palestinians have noted the recent sharp differences between Israel and the United States. Israeli officials believe Abbas hopes to use the issue to drive a wedge between Israel and the United States and get the Bush administration to pressure Israel to stop building it, on the grounds that it takes in large swaths of the West Bank and thus prejudges a final territorial accommodation.

Abbas also reportedly will urge Bush to pressure Sharon to put more West Bank cities under Palestinian security control. He argues that unless he has real achievements to show the Palestinian people, his shaky position as prime minister in P.A. President Yasser Arafat’s shadow will be further weakened. Indeed, Abbas hopes his high-profile meeting with Bush will itself give him more standing and credibility on the Palestinian street.

Abbas also apparently intends to use his American sojourn to win support in Congress, the media and the American Jewish community, and has scheduled meetings with key figures in all three groups.

According to aides, Sharon’s main goal will be to convince Bush that the Palestinians must be held to their commitments in the fight against terror. Sharon, they say, will suggest linking further prisoner releases to Palestinian dismantling of militia groups and the collection of illegal weapons.

Sharon will point out that two months have elapsed since the road map was launched at a summit in Aqaba, Jordan, in early June. During that time the Palestinians have not taken serious action against Hamas or Islamic Jihad, and Israeli intelligence sources say the terrorist groups continue to arm themselves under cover of the cease-fire. It is time for the Palestinians to act, Sharon will insist.

Sharon hopes to deflect American pressure on Israel by releasing a large group of prisoners and dismantling more illegal West Bank settlement outposts before his meeting with Bush.

As for the fence, Sharon will repeat what he told British Prime Minister Tony Blair last week: "I am a simple farmer, and I tell you plainly the fence is only a security obstacle to stop suicide bombers, and not in any way a political border."

Sharon has agreed to Palestinian demands to set up a joint Israeli-Palestinian team to agree on a list of prisoners to be released. Though the terrorist groups have made the prisoner release a condition of their cease-fire, it is not one of Israel’s obligations under the road map. However, Israeli officials believe that releasing prisoners may help Abbas’ public stature.

Out of sensitivity to the pressures on Abbas, Sharon has agreed to release some detainees who are members of Hamas and Islamic Jihad. In deference to Israeli public sentiment, however, he is refusing to release prisoners with blood on their hands.

Leslie Susser is the diplomatic correspondent for the Jerusalem Report.

Sharon, Abbas Court White House Read More »