fbpx

August 15, 2002

Serving Jewish Pride in L.A.

Jewish tennis players served up a strong presence at this summer’s Los Angeles-based pro tournaments, with Israelis Harel Levy, Noam Okun and Anna Smashnova participating in recent Southland competitions.

Levy, who lost to American Toby Ginepri in the first round, and Okun played in the 76th Annual Mercedes-Benz Cup held at UCLA’s Los Angeles Tennis Center held July 20-28. Levy, 24, ranked the No. 1 Israeli player in 2000 and 2001, smiles when he’s told that younger Jewish players look up to him. "It’s nice to hear that. I want to represent Israel and the Jewish people the best I can," said Levy, who served three years in the Israeli army. "I play for myself first. But then whatever my play can do for the Jewish community is great — just great."

Smashnova, who has ranked as high as 17th in the world, is less comfortable in the Jewish spotlight. "I am not [a] practicing [Jew]," said Smashnova, 22, who lost to American Alexandra Stevenson in the first round of the JPMorgan Chase Open in Manhattan Beach held Aug. 4-11. "I’d rather talk about something else."

Born in Minsk, Smashnova moved to Herzelia, Israel, in 1990 with her family. Although she attended high school outside Tel Aviv and served two years in the Israeli service, she now spends most of her time in Italy. "I play for Israel. But I don’t think much about what’s happening there, especially when I’m on the court," she said.

But for Levy, who lives in Ramat-Hasharon, Israel, its current political situation is never far from his mind. "I am always worried about my friends and family and girlfriend, who are all there," Levy said. "But I try to focus on and enjoy what I have to do on the court. Because one thing I’ve learned from all this is that you have to enjoy life when you can. You never know what’s going to happen." — Carin Davis, Contributing Writer

Serving Jewish Pride in L.A. Read More »

How the West Was Won

Last Aug. 26, on a soundstage off Sunset Boulevard, Chabad of the West Coast’s 21st annual telethon was about to begin.

The stage lights dimmed to blue, Camera One wheeled in, and a spotlight trained on a young boy wearing payes (sidecurls) and knickers — Anatevka, circa 1905. The boy raised a fiddle to his chin and began a klezmer tune. A second young man, also in stylized Chasidic garb, emerged from the wings and began a slow-motion dance. The music got louder, the pace quickened, the dancer’s pirouettes followed closer upon each other and then the stage exploded in a shower of lights and electric guitars as a dozen Lubavitch yeshiva students leapt forward, twisting, turning, doing handstands and cartwheels in a frenzied circle. Cymbals clashed and a booming voice rang out: "To Life! L’Chaim!"

The seven-hour, celebrity-studded, annual extravaganza is West Coast Chabad’s largest fundraiser of the year. In 2001, the telethon netted $5 million for Chabad’s National Drug Rehabilitation Center and other social service operations; this year, they’re hoping for more. It is a truly bizarre cultural phenomenon — a televised fundraiser for a Chasidic organization whose adherents don’t watch television. A charity event that draws Hollywood celebrities from Jon Voight to Anthony Hopkins to Whoopi Goldberg, Jews and non-Jews, all of whom take the stage to extol the virtues of "doing mitzvahs" and "helping to bring Moshiach," raising money for a Jewish group whose religious lifestyle has little in common with their own. It’s weird. But it brings in the dough.

At the center of the show, dancing the hora with wild abandon every time the big board flashes a new fundraising total, is 62-year-old Rabbi Boruch Shlomo Cunin, the charismatic and controversial director of Chabad of the West Coast. In 1965, Cunin was sent by the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, from New York to California with instructions, as Cunin tells it, to "take the West Coast." Los Angeles’ big, largely unaffiliated, wealthy Jewish community was laid out before the young rabbi like a glittering jewel, if he had the moxie to grab hold of it.

And he did. Today, Cunin is one of Chabad’s most successful fundraisers in the world — in 2001 he raised his own $10 million operating budget plus another $5 million for capital expenses — and he oversees more than 100 Chabad outreach centers and 28 other schools and institutions throughout California and Nevada.

In Chabad circles, they call it "Cunin’s Empire" — and they don’t always mean it kindly. Cunin’s six sons and three eldest daughters are all shlichim (Chabad emissaries), all of whom are working in California. When Cunin sent his eldest daughter, Channa, and her new husband to Brentwood in 1985 to establish Chabad operations there, some Chabadniks muttered about nepotism. They complained to the Rebbe, who — according to the story — reminded them that he, too, went to work for his father-in-law, the previous Rebbe. Today, all of Cunin’s children have linked their work to their father’s. They treat him with a kind of awe, almost a formal deference mixed with unabashed adoration, as if, although they’ve known him all their lives, they still can’t quite believe he exists.

Cunin is a huge whirlwind of a man; a brash, blustery guy who hugs men he’s just met, laughs loudly, speaks in a raspy half-shout and isn’t ashamed of tears. He loves to bring up his boyhood in the Bronx, where, he says, he learned to defend his Jewish identity with his fists. "I’m an American boy, and I can hit a baseball," he boasts. Son and grandson of Lubavitchers, he is proud of his street smarts. Like other Chabadniks, he hasn’t been to college — the Rebbe discouraged it — but unlike some, Cunin relishes his lack of formal education. "What’s a Ph.D. mean?" he asks rhetorically. "Papa Has Dough."

When it comes to soliciting potential donors, or confronting politicians, Cunin is fearless. He marches into their offices, states his needs and waits out the opposition. He’s weathered lawsuits, badgered recalcitrant city councils, and has been rumored to tear up checks in a donor’s face if he thinks the amount is too small. He expands Chabad’s West Coast operations at a startling rate. In June 2001, Cunin announced he was opening seven new Chabad centers in one week. Five had no office space. Two had no personnel. But that didn’t faze him.

"He’s unstoppable," remarks Los Angeles County Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky, who has known Cunin since the late ’60s. "If you’re in a war, you want him in your bunker."

You can love him, or you can not love him, but you can’t dismiss him.

"He’s had an enormous effect on Jewish life [in this city]," says Gerald Bubis, founding director of the School of Jewish Communal Services at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion, where he now serves as professor emeritus. "He’s one of the greatest fundraisers in the country."

Bubis first met Cunin in 1965 or 1966, when Bubis was serving as director of the JCC in Long Beach. Cunin walked into his office one day and asked whether he thought Long Beach could support a day school. "After I’d pontificated for about three minutes, I paused and said, ‘You’re not asking me. You’ve come to announce that you’re doing it, aren’t you?’"

Cunin said yes.

"I told him, if you do, and it’s successful, I’ ll eat my hat," Bubis says.

Cunin opened the day school, which flourished, and every time since then when the two men meet, the rabbi asks Bubis how his hat tastes.

"I have great admiration for what he’s accomplished, along with great concern as to whether there’s proper accountability and oversight," Bubis says. "There’s no board of directors. I’m very ambivalent."

>From the beginning, Cunin has had a checkered relationship with Los Angeles’ Jewish establishment. Soon after he arrived, he tried to organize Jewish classes for "religious release hour," a program that took children out of the public schools for one hour a week for religious instruction. Los Angeles’ municipal religious liaison committee told him he needed approval from The Jewish Federation, but when Cunin went to meet with the local machers, they shot down the idea. No mixing of religion and public school education, they told him.

Cunin, barely 25 at the time, stared them down. "I told them, ‘Let’s get the record straight. You may be big guys here, but on me, you got nothing. My boss is God. Moses, who tells me what to do, is the Rebbe. I’m a train coming down the track, and you can either get on board, step out of the way or be run over.’"

Over the years, Cunin has clashed repeatedly with Jewish and other organizations in his way. He has fought rabbis, federations and the American Civil Liberties Union over public menorah lightings throughout California. In virtually every case, he won. In 1989, he became embroiled in a messy lawsuit over ownership of The Bayit, a Jewish student cooperative at UCLA he was using for Chabad activities. A settlement was reached in 1995 and The Bayit returned to student hands, but rancor remained.

"I can’t go into the terms of the agreement, but Chabad came out nicely," says columnist Avi Davis, president of The Bayit’s board of directors.

Cunin’s latest battle erupted this January, when he fired Rabbi Shmulik Naperstak as director of Chabad of the Marina. Naperstak refuses to vacate the synagogue building for which he claims to have raised most of the funding; Cunin claims that the building belongs to Chabad of the West Coast, Naperstak’s titular employer. In the fluid, semicorporate world of Lubavitch, where straying followers are urged back into the fold rather than kicked out, and where an individual Chabad emissary who raises his own funding can take headquarters’ directives with a grain of salt, Cunin — like other emissaries — is usually left alone to run his own affairs.

This time, Naperstak’s donors raised a stink, Lubavitch headquarters in Brooklyn stepped in and both parties agreed to go to the central Lubavitch rabbinical court for adjudication. The case is still pending.

Cunin’s boundless energy and his refusal to take "no" for an answer are fueled by his overwhelming dedication to the late Lubavitcher Rebbe. Cunin repeats endlessly that he is a soldier in his Rebbe’s army, spurred on even today by Schneerson’s spirit and holiness. His love for Schneerson is palpable — when he talks about the Rebbe, his face shines and tears come to his eyes.

That love has motivated the many "firsts" Cunin has chalked up over the years: the first Chabad House (UCLA, in 1969); the first mitzvah tank (a refurbished mobile home he used to house an after-school Jewish children’s program); the first sukkah-mobile.

Now that’s a story, he says: "I saw a trailer going by on Fairfax Boulevard … advertising something, and I said, what a great idea! So I followed the trailer to a parking lot where I see a half-dozen of these dilapidated vehicles. I go inside and there’s a little yiddel [Jewish man] behind the counter. I say, ‘Are these trailers for rent?’ He said, ‘For a price, anything’s for rent.’ But he wouldn’t pay for the liability insurance, so I said, ‘OK, sell me the trailer.’ He said, ‘It’s not for sale.’ I said, ‘That’s good, because I have no money, so give it to me.’ And he gave me the trailer."

Cunin used the trailer that year as the first sukkah-on-wheels. After the holiday, he hooked it up to the back of his Chevy Nova, set up two large bullhorns in front, and drove the contraption to Federation headquarters where he drove around the parking lot, shouting, "Give your child a free Jewish education! Call Chabad!" through the bullhorns. "It was beautiful," he recalls.

Today Cunin controls more than $35 million in assets and broke ground in June on a $10 million girls’ school on Pico Boulevard. His latest project, Chabad Garden Preschool, a collaboration with Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, will service the education, emotional and health needs of low-income families and their children, and is presented as a model of integrated academic and medical programs.

But by the mid-1980s, his "act first and finance later" style of conducting business had landed him $18 million in debt and on the verge of collapse. At the 11th hour, he was saved by a fortuitous $21 million estate left to him by Hermine Weinberg, an elderly woman whom Cunin had listened to when no one else would. (Her family took Chabad to court to contest the will, and Cunin ended up with $21 million. It wasn’t her entire estate.)

Since that windfall, combined with two other $10 million donations, Cunin has never come close to collapse again. But on the inside of a door in his office are tacked up dozens of yellowing index cards, each one documenting what he owed to a particular bank, organization or individual in the 1980s. Whenever he’s feeling cocky, he takes a look at the cards.

Over the years, Cunin has also amassed quite a collection of Hollywood supporters. One of the biggest is film producer and philanthropist Jerry Weintraub, whose producing credits include "Ocean’s 11," "Diner" and the "Karate Kid" series. Weintraub first met Cunin 20 years ago, when he arrived at his office one morning to see a black-hatted rabbi sitting in his waiting room. Weintraub walked past Cunin into his inner office, buzzed his secretary, told her to hand the rabbi a check for $10,000 and get rid of him.

"That’s the sum I usually give," Weintraub says. "I’m involved with a lot of philanthropy, and rabbis are always coming to me for money." This rabbi was different. He refused the check and demanded to see Weintraub in person. Stunned by the audacity, Weintraub agreed; "A rabbi who turns down $10,000, I had to let him in."

Weintraub became a major feather in Cunin’s cap, helping him restructure his crippling debt and eventually becoming co-chair for the telethon. A fellow Bronx native, Weinberg says he likes Cunin’s style.

"Most of the Jews out here, the Beverly Hills crowd, they don’t like Chasidic Jews. They’re afraid of them, or embarrassed by them. I think they’re great."

It’s 8 a.m., the morning after last year’s telethon, and Cunin is already in his office. He should be exhausted, after dancing past midnight the previous evening, but he’s ready to rock ‘n’ roll. He has a lot of follow-up calls to make, to remind donors to send in their pledges. "This is our major presence for the year," he notes. "All our major gifts tie back to the telethon. You know that $21 million gift? She was a telethon watcher."

The phone rings. It’s a woman whose actor son has a drug problem. They were at the telethon last night and are now staying in a nearby hotel while she tries to convince her son to enter Chabad’s rehab center. "We need to get him into treatment as soon as possible," Cunin tells her. "I hate to be so frank, but we have to take a tough stance." Cunin says he’ll send over "a couple guys" to help move the mother into an apartment.

"Don’t worry, we’ll take care of the rent until you’re on your feet," he tells her. "Put the boy on the phone." Cunin listens to the young man for a while, then begins rolling his eyes and humming "Home on the Range."

"Listen, my friend, I wrote all the songs in the book," he says sternly. "You’re a successful actor, but if you’re not willing to make an appointment at the center and get off the range, I can’t do more for you. Here, talk to Meir." Cunin hands the phone to Meir Cohen, a gray-bearded Israeli rabbi who flies in once a month to do counseling at the rehab center. Cohen listens to the young man for a minute, then puts his hand over the receiver and whispers to Cunin, "He says he doesn’t want to go in. He sees his psychiatrist every day, and he says that’s enough."

"Bubbe meises [old wives’ tales], the psychiatrist," Cunin grumbles. "His mother says he won’t eat. Get him into the program or he’ll be deader than a doornail."

Hanging up, Cunin sighs and looks at the picture of Schneerson hanging on the wall behind his desk. "When the Rebbe left us, he gave us a phenomenal yearning that doesn’t let us stop for a second," he says. "Another building, another human being, another good deed. The Rebbe said, ‘Do what you can to bring Moshiach,’ so you do more and more. A girls’ school in the morning. A drug facility. Poor people. Do what you can to bring Moshiach. Not think what you can. Not verbiage of what you can. Do what you can."

Cunin then picks up the phone, and dials another number noting, "It’s just a question of jumping over the obstacles. Of seizing the moment."

Sue Fishkoff is a freelance writer living in Pacific Grove and the author of "The Rebbe’s Army: Inside the World of Chabad-Lubavitch," scheduled for publication by Schocken Books in March 2003.

How the West Was Won Read More »

Eulogies:Maurice R. Commanday

Maurice R. Commanday, an innovative engineer in the aircraft industry, a veteran of World War II and Israel’s War of Independence, and an active supporter of the Freedom of Religion movement in Israel, died July 23 at the age of 84.

After graduating from New York University, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Air Corps in 1941 and rose to the rank of major. In 1948, he went to Israel and was instrumental in developing the infrastructure for aircraft maintenance in the fledgling Israeli air force. He served at the Ramat David airbase as chief technical officer and there met his wife, Ruth Goldman, a nurse and fellow American volunteer.

After returning to the United States in 1950, he developed an innovative process for coating metal to high heat resistance, which was used on the Apollo moon landing module in 1969.

After his initial retirement from business life in 1983, Commanday concentrated on his leadership roles in the American Technion Society, in the movement for Freedom of Religion in Israel, and in numerous local community projects. In 1994, he started the Fatigue Management Company, introducing a novel technique for testing wear in critical jet engine parts.

He is survived by his wife, Ruth; daughters, Karen Jouannaud, Chana and Dr. Ramah; and son, Frank. A memorial service was held Aug. 2 with Rabbi Ron Schulman of Congregation Ner Tamid officiating. — Tom Tugend, Contributing Editor

Eulogies:Maurice R. Commanday Read More »

Eulogies:Rabbi Marvin L. Labinger

Rabbi Marvin L. Labinger executive director of the Pacific Southwest Region of United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism from 1990-2000, died July 25, 2002 at the age of 66.

Born in Brooklyn, N.Y., he was ordained at the Jewish Theological Seminary in 1960 and immediately began a 30-year career as Jewish chaplain in the Air Force, retiring with the rank of colonel. Serving all denominations, he also developed management and leadership programs for Catholic and Protestant chaplains. The first Jewish chaplain to be chosen for any military academy, he served at several air force bases around the country, as well as in England, Spain and Germany.

In additon to the the many leadership, adult education and Judaism programs he taught, he headed the religious program at the Cuban Refugee Center from 1978-1981; taught at Temple Beth Sholom in Las Vegas in the 1980s; and in the 1990s, conducted High Holy Day services at Congregation Beth Israel in Vancouver.

Labinger was actively involved with Catholic-Jewish Dialogue and the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles.

He was a recipient of the Dr. Sheitlis Award in medieval Hebrew literature, the B’nai Brith Four Chaplains Award for Interfaith Activities, the Air Force Meritorious Service Medal and the Humanitarian Service Medal for his work with Cuban refugees.

He is survived by his wife, Joette; daughter, Gila Freeberg; son, Zev; and four grandchildren.

To donate to the Rabbi Marvin L. Labinger Memorial Fund, contact Adat Ari El, (818) 766-9426; or United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, (818) 986-0907. — USCJ

Eulogies:Rabbi Marvin L. Labinger Read More »

Furor Over Der Fuhrer

“Attempts to find in the youngster ‘the warped person within the murderous dictator’ have proved unpersuasive. If we exclude our knowledge of what was to come, his family circumstances invoke, for the most part, sympathy for the child exposed to them.”
— Ian Kershaw,

“Hitler: l889-l936 Hubris.”

Historian Ian Kershaw clearly understands the inherent risks in telling the story of the greatest sociopath of the 20th century. In his definitive two-volume biography of Adolf Hitler, after describing Hitler’s difficult childhood with a stern authoritative father who beats him, he describes the biographer’s dilemma: “A feasible in-built danger in any biographical approach,” he writes, “is that it demands a level of empathy with the subject which can easily slide over into sympathy, perhaps even hidden or partial admiration.”

Amen. The first draft of G. Ross Parker’s script for CBS’ proposed four-hour miniseries based on the first volume of Kershaw’s work, secretly released to The Journal, does indeed at least in the beginning slide into sympathy, if not admiration.

If the printed page evokes sympathy, how much bigger is the problem when the young Hitler, a devoted son to his mother and a loyal friend, is shown playing cowboys and Indians with his pals in a sunny field in Linz, Austria, and sitting in a classroom where his teacher admires his intelligence and his dreams of one day getting out of Austria and becoming a great artist?

The script depicts the teenage Hitler on his first foray into big city life in Vienna, as a Goth-like poseur, dressed all in black carrying an ivory-topped cane — a kind of Andy Warhol meets a wannabe rock star, railing against the Philistine bourgeoisie who wouldn’t recognize talent if it hit them between the eyes, and pining for the beautiful rich blonde who doesn’t know he’s alive. Is this a character American teens can identify with — or what? Their parents, on the other hand, could well respond to Hitler’s virulent anti-communism, his bravery amid the slaughter of war and his military discipline maintained even as his fellow soldiers become a rabble.

“Hitler is a winner, a survivor,” says a former top network executive who has read the script. “They throw everything at him, they try to kill him, they put him in jail, he finds a way out, he gets rid of his opponents, he wins. By the end of the second night he’s the king — he’s the German Rocky.”

John Fishel, president of The Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles, who has also read the script, says it’s not really the screenwriter’s fault that Hitler emerges as a recognizable human being.

“This is an extraordinarily complex person who did atrocious, horrible things, but to bring some life to him in a TV series, I was struck by the fact that it’s an overly human portrayal of a guy who was the epitome of evil.”

By the second night of the series, however, there is little for anybody to admire in this absurdly Chaplinesque mediocrity, with appalling manners, and a Messiah complex: (“Did you know I was born on Easter day?”) He’s an opportunist who delights in the poverty of the Germans because he sees it his path to power; a leader, surrounded by deviants and sycophants, who runs to save himself leaving his followers to die in the street; a self worshipper consumed by his own vanity; and a sexual “weirdo” who might be having an incestuous relationship with his young niece that drives her to suicide.

But will audiences get that far? Once the script gets into the heavy-duty politics, the endless strategic bull sessions between Hitler and his cohorts, they’re likely to switch off in droves. To quote Oscar Wilde in another context, “It’s worse than immoral, it’s boring.”

It’s also, at times, faintly ridiculous. As a reliable historian, Kershaw refrains from putting words in Hitler’s mouth, whereas television scripts are all about dialogue. And some of it is laughably banal.

Goring: “God in heaven, Goebbels, you’re enough to turn me back to morphine.”

Hitler: “Introduce me to more of these wealthy old ladies. They adore me. So many of their boys died in the Great War. So now they want to adopt me.” (It sounds like a line straight out of “The Producers.”)

There is a tendency to insert things that may appeal to American audiences. Parker (who wrote: “Exodus l947” for ABC television, “Sesame Street,” cable TV’s “Deadline,” adapted from the Sam Fuller novel) invents a truly ludicrous scene between Hitler and his foreign press liaison, the half-American publisher Ernst Hanfstaengl. The Harvard-educated aristocrat Hanfstaengl plays “Hail Harvard” on the piano while Hitler marches up and down to the martial music. In the twinkling of an eye, the cheer “Hail Harvard” becomes “Heil Hitler.”

“This is just what we need for the movement,” an excited Adolf says. “On their feet, everyone shouting together.” Harvard should sue.

As the Fuhrer furor has grown, some Jewish leaders have questioned CBS’ timing in running a prime-time miniseries about a youthful Hitler with its inherent scenes of pageantry, marching bands and banners in the middle of one of the greatest crisis facing the Jews worldwide for 50 years.

Rabbi John Rosove of Temple Israel in Hollywood, who has also seen the script, says, “With the fear of terrorism everywhere and the economic recession, anti-Semites coming out of the woodwork all over Europe from the left and right, little sympathy anywhere for Israel, and a lot of latent anti-Semitism in America, the timing couldn’t be worse.”

Rosove worries about a subliminal message being conveyed by the story. “They had a lot of economic problems just like we do and Hitler brought them out of the depression. They might say, ‘He did a bad thing killing all those people but if he hadn’t done that he would have been a great leader,'” he says.

The former network executive goes further. “I think it’s going to get people killed. You’re going to see swastikas on synagogues, kids ‘heiling’ Hitler at high schools.”

But others are more moderate in their reaction.

“We live in a country where we all value freedom of expression,” Fishel says. “But they have to reflect on the potential consequences of their final script, and will it have an impact they haven’t thought of?”

Alhough the Federation has no official position on the film, Fishel said, “I am concerned that something as important as this project be done well. Let them think it through and not react in knee-jerk fashion.”

Peter Sussman, CEO of Alliance Atlantis Entertainment, the company making the film for CBS, defends the miniseries: “We are obviously aware of the sensitivities. I’m Jewish myself,” Sussman says.

“I have no intention of making a film that makes him out to be any kind of good guy, hero or misunderstood youth. He was a manipulative son of a bitch, not a guy who has been dealt a bad hand.”

But Sussman doesn’t think Hitler as a subject should be ignored: “That’s the big mistake. The worst kind of evil is that which is not visible. Guys in Germany who knew the Sept 11th terrorists said they were so nice and friendly and educated. Hitler didn’t come out of his mummy’s tummy evil. He didn’t have a sign on him saying ‘evil.’ By the time the German people realized how evil he was, it was too late.”

Despite the concern of community leaders, by the end of the four hours, this Hitler is anything but a great leader. Kershaw’s interest is in the societal influences on Hitler, the factors that turned him from just another narcissist who thought he had a future into a raving lunatic for whom the Jews were the anti-Christ.

The TV script, which is likely to have several rewrites before shooting begins, follows Kershaw’s evidence that Hitler couldn’t have cared less about the Jews, and if anything, he was at one time rather favorably disposed to them. He admires his mother’s Jewish physician, giving him one of his prized watercolors. He compares them favorably to the Germans for their ability to “stick together.” But in the screenplay, when he makes his first beer hall speech, the audience reacts viscerally to his mention of the Jews — more even than to Hitler’s real bugaboo, the communists — and he has found his easy rabble-rousing dogma.

It’s the typically facile “Aha!” moment beloved of television movies. Kershaw, on the other hand, resists easy answers, insisting, “In truth, we do not know for certain why or even when Hitler turned into a manic and obsessive anti-Semite.”

The British historian carefully paints a picture of the turn-of-the-century Vienna, “one of the most virulently anti-Jewish cities in Europe” that Hitler encounters at an impressionable age. He quotes a local politician saying the Jewish problem would be solved, and a service to the world achieved if all the Jews were placed on a large ship to be sunk on the high seas.

Karl Lueger, the lord mayor of Berlin who was greatly admired by Hitler, declared, “Wolves, leopards and tigers were more human than Jews — these beasts of prey in human form.”

When accused of stirring up anti-Semitism, Lueger said it wasn’t a problem, because anti-Semitism would die out, “when the last Jews perished.” And Kershaw discounts Hitler’s friends who said they didn’t recall him spouting anti-Semitic slogans, pointing out that such opinions would have been completely unremarkable in the Jew-hating Vienna of that period. The same would have been true of Munich, which was Hitler’s next port of call.

None of this finds its way into the first draft of the script, and the effect is to minimize the complicity in his crimes of the society in which Hitler lived. The script gives credence to the idea that the Fuhrer was a one-time only maniac who couldn’t happen again. It also once again lets Austria off the hook for Hitler.

In the penultimate scene of the movie in which Hanfstaengl, having fled Germany, is being debriefed by U.S. military intelligence, Parker finally addresses the question of collective responsibility. “Hitler didn’t steal anything,” Hanfstaengl says. “We gave it to him, all of us. The car, the keys, the gas. Then all of Germany jumped in the backseat to enjoy the ride. God knows where he’s going to take them.”

But it’s too little, too late.

Meanwhile, rumors are circulating that CBS is having trouble finding an actor willing to take on Hitler. Hard to believe. Anyone who has had even minimal contact with actors knows they would murder their mother to get a chewing-up-the-scenery role like this one. But despite the genuine concerns, the hand-wringing and the community efforts to change CBS’ collective mind, the movie will almost certainly go forward.

Daily Variety’s Army Archerd quotes CBS Chief Leslie Moonves, who, while pointing out that his Polish grandmother was the only one of 11 children to survive the Holocaust, insists: “I feel totally comfortable with it. I still believe we should deal with all historic subjects. Should we put our heads in the sand?”

A spokesman at CBS referred The Journal’s questions about the script changes to the film’s producers at Alliance Atlantic, the Canadian -headquartered production company.

But to allay our own fears, we prefer to rely on the opinion of a colleague who resists the alarmists.

“We needn’t worry,” he says. “Nobody under the age of 50 is going to watch the damn thing anyway.” And that may be CBS’ real punishment — lousy ratings.

Furor Over Der Fuhrer Read More »

L.A. Rabbis, Jackson Push for Peace

Rabbis Steven Jacobs and Leonard Beerman from Los Angeles, along with six other clergy members traveling with the Rev. Jesse Jackson, had just left a meeting with Yasser Arafat and were on the way to see Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, the head of Hamas, when they heard about the bombing at Hebrew University.

The bus continued on to the Erez crossing at Gaza, and it was there that the interfaith delegation decided to cancel the visit with the man whose group had orchestrated the attack. They headed instead to Jerusalem, where the delegation went to Hadassah Hospital to visit the wounded.

"We believe in principle that if you want to get people out of jail, you have to talk to the man who has the keys, and we felt that we had to talk to the man who is responsible for terror," said Beerman, rabbi emeritus of Leo Baeck Temple in West Los Angeles and a longtime peace activist. "But we couldn’t talk to him with our dead right before us."

The delegations’ U-turn at Gaza signifies the tortured polarity of the weeklong mission: The group went to preach a message of nonviolence, to facilitate dialogue and to see to humanitarian issues, and at the same time was confronted with a grisly reality, meeting with Israelis and Palestinians whose lives have been shattered by the violence.

But it is just that reality which made the message much more urgent, Beerman told The Journal upon returning to Los Angeles.

"There are people who still cling to the possibility that there can be a diplomatic solution to this issue, and that Israelis and Palestinians are not condemned forever to slaughter one another or defend themselves against slaughter," Beerman said.

Beerman and Jacobs, the rabbi at Kol Tikvah in Woodland Hills who has traveled before with Jackson, were the two Jewish representatives on the mission, which had the support of the both the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority. In addition to Arafat, the group met with Shimon Peres, Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, Chief Rabbi Yisrael Lau, Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat and the Palestinian Authority Cabinet, which, thanks to the group’s visit, had its first full meeting in months since travel is so restricted in the area.

"One of the highest challenges of religion is to meet with your enemy," Jacobs said. "We knew that we were meeting the declared enemies of the Jewish people, yet we felt that we could talk about nonviolence and help in this downward spiral of events. There is terror and anxiety which grips everyone everywhere, so they don’t know where to turn."

Jacobs said the conversation with Arafat was "very tough, but very candid."

According to The Jerusalem Post, the group first listened to a prepared statement in which Arafat listed his grievances with America and Israel. Jackson helped Arafat and Erekat draft a statement, which Arafat read in Arabic and English, saying that he is "committed to peace through ending the Israeli occupation and establishing a Palestinian state with Jerusalem as its capital, next to the state of Israel." Arafat also condemned "violence, suicide, terrorism, bloodshed and confusion," as "not serving Palestinian interests."

Jacobs said he urged Arafat to resolve the issue of Israel’s missing soldiers and civilians, including soldiers kidnapped in Lebanon and a businessman who was kidnapped while traveling in Europe.

Jackson took on the issues of malnourishment among Palestinian children, which was cited in a report while the delegation was there, and tried to get Israel to ease travel restrictions so students could take final exams.

"The only hope is the lingering possibility that each can bring themselves to see the humanity of the other," Beerman said.

Jacobs said that despite Israeli grief and Palestinian despair, he found reason to hope.

Intellectuals at Palestinian universities privately told him they were ready to live side by side with the Jewish state and that they were ready to see the violence end. Israelis spoke of a negotiated solution.

One of the most moving moments for Beerman came at the end of a meeting at the Ministry of Defense.

"We were meeting with this phalanx of officers in uniform, and at the end of the meeting, Jesse Jackson said, ‘Let us pray.’ And I winced, and I thought these are hardly dati’im [religious people], these generals and officers," Beerman said.

Then Jackson asked them all to hold hands.

"And there we stood, our delegation and generals and officers, and we held hands in this room in the ministry, and Jesse said, ‘Rabbi Beerman, will you lead us in prayer?’"

As Beerman spoke the words, "Sim Shalom, Tovah U’vracha," he could hear many of the military men quietly join in.

Then he continued in English: "Grant us peace, Thy most precious gift, O Thou eternal source of peace, and enable Israel to be a messenger of peace unto all the peoples of the earth."

L.A. Rabbis, Jackson Push for Peace Read More »

Mrs. Matriarch

Miriam Cunin walks past the wall of books and the plastic-covered sofas in her living room toward a narrow table packed with photographs. Across the middle, there is a row of picture frames, each containing a black-bearded male and a bewigged woman, along with various numbers of children.

“This is Larchmont, Malibu, Cheviot Hills, Beverlywood, Pacific Palisades, Brentwood,” she says, tapping each one as she goes down the row.

Cunin, wife of Rabbi Boruch Shlomo Cunin, the head of West Coast Chabad, is immensely proud of her children and the communities they lead. She can boast that all 13 not only stayed on the path of Chabad Chasidus, but that they themselves are already, or will become, leaders in Southern California communities.

It is a feat not many can boast, and to Cunin the formula is deceptively simple.

“We just shared our information about how wonderful it is, how fortunate we are to be connected to the Rebbe,” she says of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the Lubavitcher Rebbe, and his mystical approach to Torah and good deeds. Then, with the confident smile and accompanying shrug of one who has figured it out, she invokes a mantra that comes back several times in the conversation: “Once you know, you know.”

This kind of clarity and faith seems to underlie much of how Cunin approaches her role as an educator and role model in Chabad.

She is a young looking 55, elegantly put together and much calmer than one would expect from a mother of 13 and grandmother of, knayne hara, many grandchildren (don’t bother asking how many, she doesn’t count).

She speaks quickly and quietly, a slight hint of her Parisian birth and Yiddish-speaking upbringing accent her speech.

She is as understated and gentle as her husband is bear-like.

Rabbi Cunin says his wife’s equanimity, stemming from a reserve of deep faith, has balanced the family’s energy level. He says he always tried to keep business out of the home, which worked well with Miriam Cunin’s desire to maintain some privacy for her very public family.

“She is a calm bastion of strength and faith,” Rabbi Cunin says of his wife, whom he married when she was 17.

Still, as is the case with most Chabad couples sent as emissaries, Miriam Cunin has been an integral part of building West Coast Chabad, the mission the Lubavitcher Rebbe entrusted to the young couple.

“We felt so privileged that the Rebbe would give us such a mission,” she says.

The Cunins have built West Coast Chabad into an empire of myriad Chabad Houses, dozens of schools, camps and programs and the annual Chabad Telethon. Along the way, Rabbi Cunin has encountered his share of controversy.

“We believe in the same things, we have the same goals and ideals,” she says of her husband. “It is painful that it has to go through a period of controversy, but I know we are doing the right thing, and truth will prevail. We’ve always felt that way,” she says.

Her role in Chabad varies widely, but includes teaching classes on marriage and family, organizing monthly luncheons for Chabad women and occasionally the international convention for Chabad women, when it is in Los Angeles.

Her son, Rabbi Chaim Cunin, who publishes Fabrengen magazine for Chabad, always has his mother — a gifted wordsmith, poet and artist — read all the copy before the magazine goes to press.

She also ends up spending a lot of time on the phone, advising women who seek her help.

“I might make a call for a luncheon but all of sudden they need something, and it turns into a wonderful opportunity to help someone,” she says.

Her son points to his mother’s private accomplishments, as well. She spends every Friday afternoon going to old age homes, where she lights Shabbat candles with 70 or 80 patients who consider her a daughter (some patients with dementia actually think she is their daughter). She brings new mothers prayers and a care package.

And then, of course, there is the job of being a mother and bubbie to a family the size of a small company.

He says a day hardly goes by when his mother doesn’t run into a grandchild somewhere — and she always know what is going on in that child’s life. She has a list of birthdays and anniversaries for her entire family, and on each occasion she calls the whole family to remind them to call each other. No birthday passes without a cake and a present from Bubbie.

Every Rosh Chodesh, the beginning of the new Jewish month, the entire family comes for dinner to the Westwood duplex the Cunin’s have lived in since they moved from the Fairfax area, soon after they arrived in Los Angeles.

“We grew up as such a team, such a unit,” Rabbi Chaim Cunin says of his family: two girls, six boys and then five more girls, in that order.

Shira, 15, is the second to youngest and good friends with one of her oldest nieces — who is in Shira’s class.

“There’s always something new going on, always a new talent and there’s always an excitement to it, because of the love that is expressed, and because of the ways of Chasidus that give deeper meaning to everything,” Shira says. “There is an inner joy of life that plays out in every detail.”

She says her mother’s pure faith helped pull the family through a three-year period when her father was in Russia, working to secure the release of the Lubavitcher library the government continues to hold.

Miriam Cunin’s family goes back several generations in Chabad, hailing from the eponymous town of Lubavitch in Russia. Her grandfather was a rabbi in Communist Moscow, and she was born in Vienna, while her parents were en route from Russia to Paris after the Holocaust. When she was 7, they came to Crown Heights, N.Y., Chabad’s postwar headquarters.

“My family has so many experiences, and we know this is the right way. It’s wonderful when you can live in confidence that what you are doing is right.”

After all, “once you know,” she says with a smile and a shrug, “you know.”

Mrs. Matriarch Read More »

The Ethics of Revenge

My beloved son, Arik, my own flesh and blood, was murdered by Palestinians.

My tall, blue-eyed, golden-haired son who was always smiling with the innocence of a child and the understanding of an adult. My son. To hit his killers, innocent Palestinian children and other civilians would have to be killed. I would ask the security forces to wait for another opportunity. If the security forces were to kill innocent Palestinians as well, I would tell them they were no better than my son’s killers.

My beloved son, Arik, was murdered by a Palestinian. Should the security forces have information of this murderer’s whereabouts, and should it turn out that he was surrounded by innocent children and other Palestinian civilians, then — even if the security forces knew that the killer was planning another murderous attack that was to be launched within hours and they now had the choice of curbing a terror attack that would kill innocent Israeli civilians, but at the cost of hitting innocent Palestinians — I would tell the security forces not to seek revenge, but to try to avoid and prevent the death of innocent civilians, be they Israelis or Palestinians.

I would rather have the finger that pushes the trigger or the button that drops the bomb tremble before it kills my son’s murderer than for innocent civilians to be killed. I would say to the security forces: do not kill the killer. Rather, bring him before an Israeli court. You are not the judiciary. Your only motivation should not be vengeance, but the prevention of any injury to innocent civilians.

Ethics are not black and white — they are all white. Ethics have to be free of vengefulness and rashness. Every act must be carefully weighed before a decision is made to see whether it meets the strict ethical criteria. Ethics cannot be left to the discretion of anyone who is frivolous or trigger-happy. Our ethics are hanging by a thread, at the mercy of every soldier and politician. I am not at all sure that I am willing to delegate my ethics to them.

It is unethical to kill innocent Israeli or Palestinian women and children. It is also unethical to control another nation and to lead it to lose its humaneness. It is patently unethical to drop a bomb that kills innocent Palestinians. It is blatantly unethical to wreak vengeance upon innocent bystanders. It is, on the other hand, supremely ethical to prevent the death of any human being. But if such prevention causes the futile death of others, the ethical foundation for such prevention is lost.

A nation that cannot draw the line is doomed to eventually apply unethical measures against its own people. The worst in my mind is not what has already happened but what I am sure one day will. And it will — because ethics are now being twisted and the political and military leadership does not even have the most basic integrity to say: "We are sorry."

We lost sight of our ethics long before the suicide bombings. The breaking point was when we started to control another nation. My son, Arik, was born into a democracy with a chance for a decent, settled life. Arik’s killer was born into an appalling occupation, into an ethical chaos. Had my son been born in his stead, he may have ended up doing the same. Had I myself been born into the political and ethical chaos that is the Palestinians’ daily reality, I would certainly have tried to kill and hurt the occupier; had I not, I would have betrayed my essence as a free man. Let all the self-righteous who speak of ruthless Palestinian murderers take a hard look in the mirror and ask themselves what they would have done had they been the ones living under occupation. I can say for myself that I, Yitzhak Frankenthal, would have undoubtedly become a freedom fighter and would have killed as many on the other side as I possibly could. It is this depraved hypocrisy that pushes the Palestinians to fight us relentlessly — our double standard that allows us to boast the highest military ethics, while the same military slays innocent children. This lack of ethics is bound to corrupt us.

My son, Arik, was murdered when he was a soldier by Palestinian fighters who believed in the ethical basis of their struggle against the occupation. My son, Arik, was not murdered because he was Jewish, but because he is part of the nation that occupies the territory of another.

I know these are concepts that are unpalatable, but I must voice them loud and clear, because they come from my heart — the heart of a father whose son did not get to live because his people were blinded with power. As much as I would like to do so, I cannot say that the Palestinians are to blame for my son’s death. That would be the easy way out, but it is we, Israelis, who are to blame because of the occupation. Anyone who refuses to heed this awful truth will eventually lead to our destruction.

The Palestinians cannot drive us away — they have long acknowledged our existence. They have been ready to make peace with us; it is we who are unwilling to make peace with them. It is we who insist on maintaining our control over them; it is we who escalate the situation in the region and feed the cycle of bloodshed. I regret to say it, but the blame is entirely ours.

I do not mean to absolve the Palestinians and by no means justify attacks against Israeli civilians. No attack against civilians can be condoned. But as an occupation force, it is we who trample over human dignity, it is we who crush the liberty of Palestinians and it is we who push an entire nation to crazy acts of despair. Finally, I call on my brothers and sisters in the settlements — see what we have come to.

The Ethics of Revenge Read More »

Video Spawns a Radio Star

It takes Jay Sanderson about 10 minutes to put me to work. It’s 8:55 a.m. on a Sunday, five minutes till broadcast of KLAC talk radio’s "The Jay Sanderson Show" and he’s having trouble getting his scheduled guest, screenwriter/producer Lionel Chetwynd, on the phone. I’m barely settled onto my little bar stool, pad of paper and pen poised to take notes, before Sanderson hands me his cell phone, and asks: "Can you get Chetwynd on the line?" I hurriedly oblige, succeeding in my mission even as I miss Sanderson’s opening words to his listeners. Such is my introduction into the world of fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants broadcasting and to Sanderson.

Dressed in a T-shirt, denim shorts, Teva sandals and a backward baseball cap, Sanderson, 45, looks the part of your typical broadcaster, relaxed in the casual atmosphere of this new job. Even as he’s about to go on the air — sans featured guest — he is focused, not worried. When I return to the booth after my errand, Sanderson is sitting comfortably as he chats on the air with the Weather Yenta. The forecast for today? "That’s why the air condition [sic] was invented," she says. The two other featured personalities follow: Jordan "Sports Guy" Rush gives us this week’s stats on Jewish athletes like Shawn Green and Jeff Nathan, and the Food Maven answers the question, "What’s for breakfast?" It turns out to be matzah frittata.

"Our main topic today is, we’re gonna be looking at things from both sides, from the left and from the right," Sanderson tells whoever might be listening to his early Sunday morning time slot of 9-10 a.m. In the eighth installment of "The Jay Sanderson Show," Sanderson has liberal music executive Danny Goldberg and the conservative Chetwynd square off on various issues from politics to parenting. He plays moderator, occasionally piping in with his two cents, but mostly directing the questions and reeling in the two guests when it’s time for another commercial break. Sanderson encourages his listeners to call in to 1-866-570-KLAC, though no one does. It’s unclear if many people are listening — yet.

But that doesn’t bother Sanderson, who’s new to radio. By day, Sanderson is the CEO of the Jewish Television Network, a nonprofit organization that is the Jewish community’s only national television network. (His previous work experience was in commercial film writing and producing, and nonprofit management and fundraising with the Brandeis-Bardin Institute.)

Sanderson’s moonlighting gig as a Jewish radio personality began with a casual cocktail party conversation with Steve Wexler, an account executive at KLAC/KFI, four months ago, regarding the Jewish "void in the talk radio world." Sanderson suggested himself to fill that void, to create "a place where the wide landscape of Jewish interests and thought can reach a radio audience." He was on the air six weeks later.

In the beginning, the shows did not run smoothly. Sanderson struggled with numerous technical problems, but his quick wit helped compensate for his lack of technical savvy. "Today, we will call it the technically challenged show. Who could I disconnect next?" Sanderson asked on-air. "Well, I could disconnect you if you called in at 1-866-570-KLAC."

The neophyte also struggles with tone. On his first radio show, he focused on Israeli terror victims, and he inappropriately asked a documentarian discussing terror victims, "Are the Israeli drivers any better than the Los Angeles drivers?"

Yet for all his inexperience, Sanderson is taking on a substantial task in trying to cover a swath of subjects ranging from the best bagels in Los Angeles to terrorism. Sanderson has yet to find his voice in such a broad format of Jewish Los Angeles, and he admits he’s relieved that not many people are listening yet. He jokingly refers to his 13 listeners, and says, "I’m learning on the job, and some of it is knowing what buttons to push and knowing what to say and when to say it." As Sanderson puts it, "It’s a work in progress."

The future is still uncertain for the fledgling radio show. Sanderson credits the radio station with being committed to the idea that the show is still building an audience. Indeed, KLAC is still working on its own growth, with its May 2001 transformation from playing "singers and standards" to a talk radio format.

"The Jay Sanderson Show" is bookended by health infomercials, which serve to meet the radio station’s economic needs, as it continues to mature. All of this leaves Sanderson with virtually unlimited freedom to pursue his vision for the show. "I’ve been given carte blanche basically to do whatever I wanted to do. It’s great, but it’s a bigger responsibility, because if someone says, ‘Do these five things,’ it’s easier than having a wide world."

Sanderson seems to be navigating through that world pretty well thus far, getting more comfortable behind the mic with every show.

"I want you to have a great, great, great week," Sanderson tells listeners toward the end of his eighth show, as Warren Zevon music rises out of the background. "What we learned today is we should disagree, but we should do it and not be personal. Disagree with your neighbors as much as you can this week, but don’t get personal, and we’ll talk to you next week."

Video Spawns a Radio Star Read More »

L.A. Museums: Saved by the Jews

A small museum opened its doors in Pasadena last month and naturally enough made local headlines. The stories touched on the museum’s focus — California art, architecture and design from 1850 to the present day; and on the personal angle, namely that the $5 million Pasadena Museum of California Art is being underwritten by a couple of local art collectors, Robert and Arlene Oltman. They live on the top floor of a new three-story building, with the second-floor set aside for art galleries, a bookstore and a community room. It is in effect a private museum — they are a self-made couple who began collecting art 30 years ago — open to the public and underwritten by the Oltmans. They have agreed to pay the operating expenses of $500,000 a year for the next five years. What few reporters mentioned is that the Oltmans are Jewish. But then, why should they?

The art scene in Los Angeles, like its popular culture counterpart of film and television, is known by insiders as having a very significant Jewish presence. Drift through the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) and it is difficult to avoid noticing the prevalence of Jewish names. It is well-known that the city’s Museum of Contemporary Art, a smaller modern art museum that opened its doors in 1983, owes its existence largely to the efforts of the late Marcia Weisman — she had been the guiding force behind the idea, the fundraising, and the support of local artists — and its recent renovation to a $5 million contribution from David Geffen of Dreamworks.

When we add the Armand Hammer Museum, (opened in 1990 and now run by UCLA,) and the Norton Simon Museum (1974), and the Getty Center’s Jewish Presidents (past and present) we might conclude that without the involvement of L.A.’s Jewish population, art in the city would be greatly diminished if not invisible.

On one level, of course, none of this is new. Jews have historically been collectors, producers and consumers of art. Culture matters. But there is a fork in the road here. The cultural life of the city, not just its Jewish community, is being shaped by this new — Jewish — cultural elite. One result is that it blurs the line of living apart, of being an outsider in gentile America. After all, these are neither Jewish museums, nor Jewish art that are being championed.

Monetarily this means that Jewish philanthropy has expanded far beyond Jewish causes. Many of the museum benefactors, to be sure, are easily recognizable as major figures in the Jewish communal world, with generous contributions to organizations such as the American Jewish Committee or the Anti-Defamation League and/or The Jewish Federation. But, as several community fundraisers have noted, instead of all the disposable income, only part of it is now slotted for Jewish causes. And, of course, some of the art patrons have been more single-minded, ignoring Jewish institutions entirely. It is one of the prices of integration — of some Jews becoming part and parcel of American society, with only frayed or limited connections to Jewish communal life.

Obviously not all Jews share this view. Some point to the role culture plays in this multicultural city. LACMA’s curators apparently have adopted the idea of bringing L.A.’s diverse ethnic communities to the museum by organizing shows that attempt to link art with the city’s populace, A retrospective of Mexican artist Diego Rivera was one case in point as was a show concentrated on the Harlem Renaissance. Friday evenings, the museum draws a diverse crowd to its free open-air jazz concerts, followed on Sunday by free concerts of classical music.

It is a policy that the Getty — elitist to the core in the past — has also attempted to emulate since its new palatial Getty Center, designed by architect Richard Meier, opened its doors four and a half years ago.

This inclusive approach, reaching out to the city’s diverse population, has been echoed and made central to the life of L.A.’s two Jewish museums: Wiesenthal Center’s Museum of Tolerance and the Skirball Cultural Center. The Wiesenthal’s museum, at its core, carries an instructional mandate: Educate the public about the Holocaust in particular, and prejudice and discrimination in general. With that in mind, it plays host to school children nearly every day of the school year, and runs training programs for teachers and police. Its goal: to focus on the human cost of persecution. It is ironic, perhaps, that Rabbi Marvin Hier, the center’s director, is an Orthodox rabbi who relies on national contributions from Jews of all denominations as well as from non-Jews. Hier is fond of explaining that the museum would not exist if it depended on Orthodox Jewry for its funds. Not surprisingly 80 percent of the 350,000 visitors who pass through its doors are not Jewish.

The Skirball Cultural Center sees itself as an institution "rooted in American and Jewish values," according to Dr. Uri D. Herscher, its founding president and CEO. Herscher views his center as "a Jewish institution in an American context."

In effect, it introduces Jewish values and art to the entire city, while opening the world of America, and the immigrant component within American society to L.A.’s Jewish population. The Skirball brings poets and playwrights and artist to the center who are part of the American fabric, the makers of its culture. Some are Jewish; many are not. The Skirball’s just completed major show was the traveling "Faces of Ground Zero: A Photographic tribute to America’s heroes in the aftermath of Sept. 11" — a central, tragic moment in contemporary America.

This approach to art, high and low, is perhaps the next logical step in the narrative of America’s Jews. By playing a central role today in the shaping of our national culture, Jews have moved inside the society, and in the process, have helped America become partly Jewish. It is a dramatic step towards inclusion. One unintended consequence of that story (which is well underway) may be that only as some Jews become thoroughly American, can they find their way forward to a Jewish identity.

L.A. Museums: Saved by the Jews Read More »