fbpx

Comments reveal true feelings about Israel’s leader

Sometimes an overheard comment sheds some light on the truth. That certainly was the case at the G-20 economic meeting in France recently when French President Sarkozy and President Obama discussed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
[additional-authors]
November 14, 2011

Special to the Los Angeles Jewish Journal

Sometimes an overheard comment sheds some light on the truth. That certainly was the case at the G-20 economic meeting in France recently when French President Sarkozy and President Obama discussed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“I cannot stand him. He is a liar,” Sarkozy said of Netanyahu. In apparent agreement, Obama replied, “You’re fed up with him, but I have to deal with him every day.”

While the French and American presidents have previously and repeatedly voiced their strong support and friendship for Israel while in public, their candid comments, which they thought were private, make you wonder about their own veracity, if not their hypocrisy.

The Sarkozy and Obama comments also make you wonder: If they don’t like working with Israel’s prime minister, which world leaders to they like? The Palestinian’s Abbas? Russia’s Putin?  Syria’s Assad? Or Iran’s Ahmadinejad? Do Sarkozy and Obama think these leaders are more honest than Benjamin Netanyahu, who won his office in a fair and open democratic election?

Israel is the only stable democracy in the Middle East and the only U.S. friend in that important region that is 100 percent in support of the United States.  Israel faces growing threats in every direction. Now more than ever, Israel needs the support of its friends. 

The “Arab spring” has destabilized Israel’s neighbors. Egypt’s former president, Mubarak, is on trial; Egypt’s adherence to the Camp David Accords is under attack; and the Muslim Brotherhood works to take control. Syria’s Assad is clinging to power through a brutal, ruthless crackdown that has killed thousands. Islamic militants also are trying to assert power in Yemen, Tunisia, and Libya.

In Jordan, King Abdullah’s reforms have not quieted dissent. Lebanon remains a flashpoint thanks to Iranian surrogate Hezbollah.  Hamas, another Iranian-backed group, continues its non-stop terror barrage on Israeli civilians from Gaza. 

Turkey’s Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, is increasingly hostile to Israel, cancelling defense cooperation with the Jewish state as he moves Turkey towards being an Islamic, secular nation.

And, in perhaps the biggest threat Israel and the U.S. face, the International Atomic Energy Agency has just reported new details about Iran’s attempts to build nuclear weapons.

Despite all these dangers to Israel, what does the Obama Administration criticize? The plan for Israel to build additional housing for its citizens within its capital city, Jerusalem.

Just two days after the Sarkozy-Obama comments about Israel’s Prime Minister became public, White House advisor Dennis Ross, one of Obama’s lead officials in handling the Middle East peace process and U.S. policy toward Iran, announced he is leaving the administration. Perhaps Obama’s comments about Netanyahu made Ross’ already tough job impossible.

The friction between Obama and Netanyahu has been clear for some time. It became very evident in May when the President raised the unacceptable prospect of a return to Israel’s indefensible pre-1967 borders as a means of advancing the peace process. Netanyahu rightly rejected the idea.

Negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians continue to be stalled, and Obama is frustrated with Israel. But which side is truly intransigent? As former Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban used to say, the Palestinians “never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.”

It is the Palestinians who repeatedly have rejected Israeli peace initiatives including very generous offers by former Israeli Prime Ministers Olmert and Barak.

It is the Palestinians who tried to circumvent direct talks with Israel to gain recognition at the United Nations.

It is the Palestinians who claim to support a two-state solution while privately saying that they consider the entirety of Israel – every inch—to be “occupied territory.”

The real problem in the Middle East is that the Palestinians really do not want to make peace with Israel. The truth is the Palestinians, like their Iranian supporters, want Israel to cease to exist.

President Obama has chosen to sharply criticize Israel’s leader in a time of increasing peril for that beleaguered nation. Our friends in Israel deserve better.

Republican Rep. Elton Gallegly represents Ventura and Santa Barbara counties in Congress and is Vice Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and Chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.

Editor's Picks

Latest Articles

The Essence of Prayer

While prayer and meditation seem similar, they are different. Prayer involves praying to a higher being. Meditation is more about focusing on yourself and your inner dialogue. Together, they can help you become more centered.

How We Got Here

Part history, part memoir, part farewell letter to her native land, “Stained Glass” tells its agonizing story with restrained anger, but more so, deep sadness.

Casting Our Votes

No endorsements. Just three possibilities to consider as we prepare to navigate an increasingly complicated political landscape before we cast our votes for these three critical offices.

Where Independence Begins: What Israel Understands About Freedom

Israel’s path to independence unfolded under conditions where the outcome remained uncertain until it was achieved. No external mechanism could deliver it cleanly or without cost. It took shape through sustained effort in an environment defined by risk.

Lies in the Air, Facts on the Ground

We sing no matter what. When the hostages were held in Gaza, we sang in their honor. When another week of bad news hits us, we sing. Our singing is our fact on the ground.

The Holy See Who Won’t See

People who should know better seem to know absolutely nothing when the stakes are at their highest. The Pope, who is the final arbiter on Catholic teachings, appears to be only vaguely familiar with both Christian and papal history.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.