I had an interesting conversation over Shabbat with a guest in my sukkah who wanted to talk politics. Immediately, I sensed trouble. I thought to myself: Are we really doing this again? Are we reminding ourselves how much we all agree with one another? And if we don’t agree, should we gear up for verbal combat during a holiday of rejoicing?
I managed to steer the conversation toward more philosophical questions, such as: Why does politics have such a hold on us? What price do we pay for allowing it to be so dominant? (I had to throw in: Will the Lakers finally beat the pesky Miami Heat?) It was a deeper conversation that took us to a more meaningful place than squabbling over candidates and political parties.
During this era of extreme partisanship, I’ve tried to look for meaningful places without taking sides. Yes, this is as hard as it sounds. It’d be much simpler to take a side, pile on, and tell readers who agree with me what they already know.
So why am I reluctant to do that? Because it’s too easy and too divisive. There is already more than enough commentary out there that reinforces what people already believe.
It’s more interesting, in my view, to look for broader ideas we all share or ought to share. Curiosity, for example. Instead of instant judgment, why not try to understand why people who disagree with us think the way they do? Stereotyping those on the other side is a time-saving device, but it doesn’t expand our own awareness and horizons.
I can’t tell you how often I hear people complain that they “just don’t understand” how anyone can vote for this or that party or candidate.
I like to reply: That’s correct, you don’t understand. But have you tried?
Putting ourselves in the shoes of the Other is one of life’s most difficult but worthy endeavors. Many of us have no problem doing that with victims of discrimination or other oppressed groups. Why not try it with those who sit on the opposite side of the political fence?
Well, for one thing, because we don’t see our political opposites as victims who deserve empathy. Because it’s too much effort. Because all we want to do is win.
But we can push for our side to win without denigrating the other side. We can understand other views without agreeing with them. We can open our minds without changing them.
Above all, even when we’re madly rooting for our team to win, we can look for things we share with the other side. As much as I enjoyed seeing my beloved Lakers bring home a championship Sunday night, I know that what I share with Miami fans is a deep love of basketball– win or lose.
Politics in the Sukkah, and Other Fine Subjects
David Suissa
I had an interesting conversation over Shabbat with a guest in my sukkah who wanted to talk politics. Immediately, I sensed trouble. I thought to myself: Are we really doing this again? Are we reminding ourselves how much we all agree with one another? And if we don’t agree, should we gear up for verbal combat during a holiday of rejoicing?
I managed to steer the conversation toward more philosophical questions, such as: Why does politics have such a hold on us? What price do we pay for allowing it to be so dominant? (I had to throw in: Will the Lakers finally beat the pesky Miami Heat?) It was a deeper conversation that took us to a more meaningful place than squabbling over candidates and political parties.
During this era of extreme partisanship, I’ve tried to look for meaningful places without taking sides. Yes, this is as hard as it sounds. It’d be much simpler to take a side, pile on, and tell readers who agree with me what they already know.
So why am I reluctant to do that? Because it’s too easy and too divisive. There is already more than enough commentary out there that reinforces what people already believe.
It’s more interesting, in my view, to look for broader ideas we all share or ought to share. Curiosity, for example. Instead of instant judgment, why not try to understand why people who disagree with us think the way they do? Stereotyping those on the other side is a time-saving device, but it doesn’t expand our own awareness and horizons.
I can’t tell you how often I hear people complain that they “just don’t understand” how anyone can vote for this or that party or candidate.
I like to reply: That’s correct, you don’t understand. But have you tried?
Putting ourselves in the shoes of the Other is one of life’s most difficult but worthy endeavors. Many of us have no problem doing that with victims of discrimination or other oppressed groups. Why not try it with those who sit on the opposite side of the political fence?
Well, for one thing, because we don’t see our political opposites as victims who deserve empathy. Because it’s too much effort. Because all we want to do is win.
But we can push for our side to win without denigrating the other side. We can understand other views without agreeing with them. We can open our minds without changing them.
Above all, even when we’re madly rooting for our team to win, we can look for things we share with the other side. As much as I enjoyed seeing my beloved Lakers bring home a championship Sunday night, I know that what I share with Miami fans is a deep love of basketball– win or lose.
Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
Editor's Picks
Israel and the Internet Wars – A Professional Social Media Review
The Invisible Student: A Tale of Homelessness at UCLA and USC
What Ever Happened to the LA Times?
Who Are the Jews On Joe Biden’s Cabinet?
You’re Not a Bad Jewish Mom If Your Kid Wants Santa Claus to Come to Your House
No Labels: The Group Fighting for the Political Center
Latest Articles
Race to Erase MS Gala 2024: Where Glamour Meets Giving Back!
Talmudic Grappling is Alive and Well at Milken Conference
Artist Chari Pere Creates Cartoonmentary on Miscarriage
100th Anniversary: The U.S. Immigration Law That Doomed Europe’s Jews
Chef Katie Chin: Heritage, Chinese Cooking and Chocolate-Raspberry Wontons
Yom HaShoah Ceremony Draws 600 Attendees to Pan Pacific Park
Culture
Chef Katie Chin: Heritage, Chinese Cooking and Chocolate-Raspberry Wontons
Taste Buds with Deb Celebrates One Year, A Triple Chai of Eps
Chico Menashe: Asif: Culinary Institute of Israel, Cooking with Chutzpah and The Open Kitchen Project
Welcome Back, Carbs!
Jews Are Becoming More, Not Less, Zionist
Zionists understand that Jews are a people not just a religion, with millennia-old ties to one particular homeland, and the right to build a state on that homeland.
Why 2024 Is Not 1968
While both crises feature a centrist president being targeted by an aggressive anti-war movement, the differences between Gaza and Vietnam are immense.
An Ode to Hillel
To Hillel International: I stand unequivocally with you, your resilient students and your devoted staff.
The Enemy is the Status Quo
The Jewish community must learn several important lessons from the civil rights movement if they want to end the occupation of US campuses by anti-Israel and antisemitic groups.
Supporting Children in Foster Care in the U.S. and Israel
There are nearly 370,000 children in the U.S. foster care system, and nearly 3,800 in Israel; 18 children were added their number on Oct. 7..
Hollywood
Spielberg Says Antisemitism Is “No Longer Lurking, But Standing Proud” Like 1930s Germany
Young Actress Juju Brener on Her “Hocus Pocus 2” Role
Behind the Scenes of “Jeopardy!” with Mayim Bialik
Podcasts
Chef Katie Chin: Heritage, Chinese Cooking and Chocolate-Raspberry Wontons
Chico Menashe: Asif: Culinary Institute of Israel, Cooking with Chutzpah and The Open Kitchen Project
More news and opinions than at a
Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.
More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.